Both CVT and MT have their own advantages and disadvantages, and the specific choice depends on driving needs and usage scenarios. CVT (Continuously Variable Transmission) achieves continuous variation of the transmission ratio through a steel belt and variable-diameter pulleys, which can keep the engine operating within the optimal speed range, significantly improving fuel economy. For instance, the certified fuel consumption of the CVT version for the same vehicle model is typically around 0.4L/100km lower than that of the MT version. MT (Manual Transmission) directly transmits power through gear sets, achieving over 95% transmission efficiency, delivering more immediate power response and offering approximately 5% to 10% lower purchase costs-making it ideal for drivers seeking engagement or operating on a tight budget. Notably, CVT maintenance costs are generally higher, whereas MT's fuel efficiency is more significantly influenced by driver technique. For daily commuting with an emphasis on comfort, CVT proves superior; for those prioritizing driving involvement or frequenting winding roads, MT better suits the requirements.
