在马来西亚的SUV市场,很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Honda CR-V 和 Subaru Forester 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的,今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比,帮你省下做功课的时间。
Honda CR-V 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 178,200 - 195,900,一共有 4 个版本,包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS(RM 195,900)、2026 1.5T 4WD V(RM 181,900)、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E(RM 178,200) 等。
Subaru Forester 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 174,000 - 197,000,一共有 3 个版本,包括 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition(RM 189,538)、2024 2.0L S EyeSight(RM 177,538)、2024 2.0L L EyeSight(RM 167,538) 等。
从价钱来看,Subaru Forester 的起步价比 Honda CR-V 便宜了 RM 4,200。老实讲,在这个价位段,几千块的差距其实不算大,关键还是看整体的性价比和长期使用成本。

Honda CR-V 搭载 2.0L 4-cyl,马力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
Subaru Forester 搭载 2.0L 4-cyl,马力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
两款车用的是同一套动力系统,日常开起来的感受基本没有差别。油耗方面也差不多,不用太纠结这一点。

Honda CR-V 车身长 4500 mm,后备箱 450 L。
Subaru Forester 车身长 4400 mm,后备箱 400 L。
空间方面,Honda CR-V 的车身比 Subaru Forester 长了 100 mm,车内乘坐空间会稍微宽裕一些,尤其是后座腿部空间。如果你经常载家人或者需要放婴儿车,大一点的车身确实更实用。

Honda CR-V 保修 5年/无限制里程,保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
Subaru Forester 保修 3年/100,000km,保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。

总的来说,Honda CR-V 和 Subaru Forester 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆,关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课,多比较几间车行的报价,再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事,花点时间做功课绝对不会错。

在马来西亚的SUV市场,很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Honda CR-V 和 Hyundai Santa Fe 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的,今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比,帮你省下做功课的时间。
Honda CR-V 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 178,200 - 195,900,一共有 4 个版本,包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS(RM 195,900)、2026 1.5T 4WD V(RM 181,900)、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E(RM 178,200) 等。
Hyundai Santa Fe 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 225,000 - 270,000,一共有 3 个版本,包括 2025 2.5T DCT 4WD Calligraphy 6 Seats(RM 270,000)、2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige 7 Seats(RM 245,000)、2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prime 7 Seats(RM 225,000) 等。
从价钱来看,Honda CR-V 的起步价确实比 Hyundai Santa Fe 便宜了 RM 46,800。如果你预算有限,Honda 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意,便宜的那几千块,可能在配备上会有取舍,具体要看你的需求。

Honda CR-V 搭载 2.0L 4-cyl,马力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
Hyundai Santa Fe 搭载 2.0L 4-cyl,马力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
两款车用的是同一套动力系统,日常开起来的感受基本没有差别。油耗方面也差不多,不用太纠结这一点。

Honda CR-V 车身长 4500 mm,后备箱 450 L。
Hyundai Santa Fe 车身长 4400 mm,后备箱 400 L。
空间方面,Honda CR-V 的车身比 Hyundai Santa Fe 长了 100 mm,车内乘坐空间会稍微宽裕一些,尤其是后座腿部空间。如果你经常载家人或者需要放婴儿车,大一点的车身确实更实用。

Honda CR-V 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Hyundai Santa Fe 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
两款车的驱动方式一样,都是 FWD,日常驾驶感受不会有太大区别。

Honda CR-V 和 Hyundai Santa Fe 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择,适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价,可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款;如果你更在意性价比和配备,那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾,亲身体验才是最重要的。

总的来说,Honda CR-V 和 Hyundai Santa Fe 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆,关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课,多比较几间车行的报价,再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事,花点时间做功课绝对不会错。

在马来西亚的SUV市场,很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Honda CR-V 和 Mazda CX-9 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的,今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比,帮你省下做功课的时间。
Honda CR-V 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 178,200 - 195,900,一共有 4 个版本,包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS(RM 195,900)、2026 1.5T 4WD V(RM 181,900)、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E(RM 178,200) 等。
Mazda CX-9 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 328,810 - 345,810,一共有 2 个版本,包括 2023 2.5T 4WD(RM 345,810)、2023 2.5T 2WD(RM 328,810) 等。
从价钱来看,Honda CR-V 的起步价确实比 Mazda CX-9 便宜了 RM 150,610。如果你预算有限,Honda 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意,便宜的那几千块,可能在配备上会有取舍,具体要看你的需求。

Honda CR-V 搭载 2.0L 4-cyl,马力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
Mazda CX-9 搭载 2.0L Turbo,马力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
动力方面,Mazda CX-9 的 2.0L Turbo 比 Honda CR-V 的 2.0L 4-cyl 多了 50 匹马力。不过日常在市区开,两款车的动力都够用,不会觉得不够力。

Honda CR-V 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Mazda CX-9 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
两款车的驱动方式一样,都是 FWD,日常驾驶感受不会有太大区别。

Honda CR-V 保修 5年/无限制里程,保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
Mazda CX-9 保修 5年/150,000km,保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。

Honda CR-V 和 Mazda CX-9 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择,适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价,可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款;如果你更在意性价比和配备,那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾,亲身体验才是最重要的。

总的来说,Honda CR-V 和 Mazda CX-9 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆,关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课,多比较几间车行的报价,再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事,花点时间做功课绝对不会错。

在马来西亚的SUV市场,很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Honda HR-V 和 Subaru Forester 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的,今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比,帮你省下做功课的时间。
Honda HR-V 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 115,900 - 143,900,一共有 4 个版本,包括 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS(RM 143,900)、2026 1.5T V(RM 137,900)、2026 1.5T E(RM 130,900) 等。
Subaru Forester 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 174,000 - 197,000,一共有 3 个版本,包括 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition(RM 189,538)、2024 2.0L S EyeSight(RM 177,538)、2024 2.0L L EyeSight(RM 167,538) 等。
从价钱来看,Honda HR-V 的起步价确实比 Subaru Forester 便宜了 RM 58,100。如果你预算有限,Honda 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意,便宜的那几千块,可能在配备上会有取舍,具体要看你的需求。

Honda HR-V 的安全评级是 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主动安全系统包括 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。
Subaru Forester 的安全评级是 5★ (Euro NCAP),主动安全系统包括 EyeSight。
安全配备方面,两款车都拿到了不错的评级。不过 Honda HR-V 的 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM) 和 Subaru Forester 的 EyeSight 在功能上有些差异,如果你比较看重主动安全的话,可以仔细对比一下两者的功能列表。

Honda HR-V 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Subaru Forester 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
两款车的驱动方式一样,都是 FWD,日常驾驶感受不会有太大区别。

Honda HR-V 保修 5年/无限制里程,保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
Subaru Forester 保修 3年/100,000km,保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。

总的来说,Honda HR-V 和 Subaru Forester 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆,关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课,多比较几间车行的报价,再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事,花点时间做功课绝对不会错。

在马来西亚的SUV市场,很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Honda HR-V 和 Chery Tiggo 9 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的,今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比,帮你省下做功课的时间。
Honda HR-V 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 115,900 - 143,900,一共有 4 个版本,包括 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS(RM 143,900)、2026 1.5T V(RM 137,900)、2026 1.5T E(RM 130,900) 等。
Chery Tiggo 9 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 166,800 - 179,800,一共有 1 个版本,包括 2026 2.0T Standard(RM 179,750) 等。
从价钱来看,Honda HR-V 的起步价确实比 Chery Tiggo 9 便宜了 RM 50,900。如果你预算有限,Honda 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意,便宜的那几千块,可能在配备上会有取舍,具体要看你的需求。

Honda HR-V 车身长 4500 mm,后备箱 450 L。
Chery Tiggo 9 车身长 4400 mm,后备箱 400 L。
空间方面,Honda HR-V 的车身比 Chery Tiggo 9 长了 100 mm,车内乘坐空间会稍微宽裕一些,尤其是后座腿部空间。如果你经常载家人或者需要放婴儿车,大一点的车身确实更实用。

Honda HR-V 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Chery Tiggo 9 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
两款车的驱动方式一样,都是 FWD,日常驾驶感受不会有太大区别。

Honda HR-V 和 Chery Tiggo 9 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择,适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价,可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款;如果你更在意性价比和配备,那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾,亲身体验才是最重要的。

总的来说,Honda HR-V 和 Chery Tiggo 9 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆,关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课,多比较几间车行的报价,再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事,花点时间做功课绝对不会错。

在马来西亚的SUV市场,很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Proton X70 和 Mazda CX-60 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的,今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比,帮你省下做功课的时间。
Proton X70 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 106,800 - 122,300,一共有 3 个版本,包括 1.5L Standard 2WD(RM 106,800)、1.5L Executive 2WD(RM 115,800)、1.5L Premium 2WD(RM 122,300) 等。
Mazda CX-60 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 200,510 - 252,873,一共有 2 个版本,包括 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus(RM 252,873)、2025 2.5L 2WD High(RM 200,510) 等。
从价钱来看,Proton X70 的起步价确实比 Mazda CX-60 便宜了 RM 93,710。如果你预算有限,Proton 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意,便宜的那几千块,可能在配备上会有取舍,具体要看你的需求。

Proton X70 的安全评级是 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主动安全系统包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Mazda CX-60 的安全评级是 5★ (Euro NCAP),主动安全系统包括 i-Activsense Pro。
安全配备方面,两款车都拿到了不错的评级。不过 Proton X70 的 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 和 Mazda CX-60 的 i-Activsense Pro 在功能上有些差异,如果你比较看重主动安全的话,可以仔细对比一下两者的功能列表。

Proton X70 车身长 4400 mm,后备箱 400 L。
Mazda CX-60 车身长 4500 mm,后备箱 450 L。
空间方面,Mazda CX-60 的车身比 Proton X70 长了 100 mm,乘坐空间更有优势。不过 Proton X70 在城市里停车会灵活一点,各有取舍。

Proton X70 和 Mazda CX-60 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择,适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价,可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款;如果你更在意性价比和配备,那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾,亲身体验才是最重要的。
总的来说,Proton X70 和 Mazda CX-60 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆,关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课,多比较几间车行的报价,再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事,花点时间做功课绝对不会错。

在马来西亚的SUV市场,很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Proton X50 和 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的,今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比,帮你省下做功课的时间。
Proton X50 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 89,800 - 113,300,一共有 4 个版本,包括 1.5T Executive(RM 89,800)、1.5T Premium(RM 101,800)、1.5T Flagship(RM 113,300) 等。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 159,750 - 159,750,一共有 2 个版本,包括 1.6L Turbo Standard(RM 130,000)、1.6L Turbo Premium(RM 145,000) 等。
从价钱来看,Proton X50 的起步价确实比 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 便宜了 RM 69,950。如果你预算有限,Proton 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意,便宜的那几千块,可能在配备上会有取舍,具体要看你的需求。

Proton X50 的安全评级是 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主动安全系统包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 的安全评级是 TBD,主动安全系统包括 Basic。
安全配备方面,两款车都拿到了不错的评级。不过 Proton X50 的 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 和 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 的 Basic 在功能上有些差异,如果你比较看重主动安全的话,可以仔细对比一下两者的功能列表。

Proton X50 车身长 4400 mm,后备箱 400 L。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 车身长 4400 mm,后备箱 400 L。
两款车的尺寸几乎一样,车内空间差别不大。这个级别的车,日常使用完全够用。

Proton X50 和 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择,适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价,可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款;如果你更在意性价比和配备,那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾,亲身体验才是最重要的。
总的来说,Proton X50 和 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆,关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课,多比较几间车行的报价,再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事,花点时间做功课绝对不会错。

在马来西亚的SUV市场,很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Perodua Ativa 和 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的,今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比,帮你省下做功课的时间。
Perodua Ativa 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 62,500 - 73,400,一共有 3 个版本,包括 1.0L Turbo X(RM 62,500)、1.0L Turbo H(RM 67,300)、1.0L Turbo AV(RM 73,400) 等。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 123,750 - 123,750,一共有 2 个版本,包括 1.6L Turbo Standard(RM 125,000)、1.6L Turbo Premium(RM 140,000) 等。
从价钱来看,Perodua Ativa 的起步价确实比 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 便宜了 RM 61,250。如果你预算有限,Perodua 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意,便宜的那几千块,可能在配备上会有取舍,具体要看你的需求。

Perodua Ativa 搭载 1.5L 4-cyl,马力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 搭载 1.5L Turbo,马力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
动力方面,Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 的 1.5L Turbo 比 Perodua Ativa 的 1.5L 4-cyl 多了 35 匹马力。不过日常在市区开,两款车的动力都够用,不会觉得不够力。

Perodua Ativa 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
两款车的驱动方式一样,都是 FWD,日常驾驶感受不会有太大区别。

Perodua Ativa 保修 5年/150,000km,保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 保修 3年/100,000km,保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
Perodua Ativa 和 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择,适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价,可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款;如果你更在意性价比和配备,那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾,亲身体验才是最重要的。
总的来说,Perodua Ativa 和 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆,关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课,多比较几间车行的报价,再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事,花点时间做功课绝对不会错。

车型概览

Audi RS Q8 值不值得买,关键不是它看起来有多吸引,而是它能不能解决你的真实用车需求。这篇文章会把重点放在长期相处时会不会带来额外压力。
版本方面,Audi RS Q8 目前可围绕 2025 4.0T quattro 来比较。
购车价格指南
评估 Audi RS Q8 的购车预算时,建议先从版本定位和后续拥车成本下手。价格不是唯一重点,真正决定是否划算的是每天会不会用到那些配置。
如果你在几个版本之间犹豫,可以把 2025 4.0T quattro 放在同一张清单里比较。日常通勤买家优先看舒适与安全,常跑高速的买家则更应重视动力、辅助驾驶和座舱便利。
核心参数汇总

看 Audi RS Q8 的核心规格,最重要是把数字翻译成生活里的感受。
Twin-Turbocharged、8缸的动力底子,适合拿来判断市区跟车和高速巡航是否轻松。 600 Ps、800 N·m的输出,真正意义在于满载、上坡和超车时不会太吃力。 车长 5012 mm、车宽 1998 mm、车高 1694 mm、轴距 2998 mm,可以帮助你预判停车难度和后排乘坐空间。 自动变速箱 变速箱、四轮驱动布局 的设定,会影响起步顺滑度、湿地稳定感和长途巡航感。
优缺点分析
Audi RS Q8 的优点不必夸张,真正有价值的是它能不能让日常使用更省心:动力输出能支撑高速和超车需求、空间和车身尺寸便于家庭买家预判实用性。
需要留意的是,市区停车和狭窄路段仍要看个人驾驶习惯。这些不是扣分项,而是下订前应该先想清楚的生活细节。
购车常见问题解答
购买 Audi RS Q8 前,买家最常问的不是单一规格,而是它能不能融入自己的生活。
这辆车适合谁?适合把长期相处时会不会带来额外压力放在首位的买家。 家庭用户要看什么?优先看后排乘坐、儿童座椅、行李和日常上下车是否顺手。 每天开会不会麻烦?如果能源成本、停车便利和版本配置都符合你的生活节奏,它会比较容易相处。
竞品对比内容
把 Audi RS Q8 放进同级车名单时,不建议只看品牌或外形。真正有用的比较顺序是:再看动力是否足够应付高速和满载、最后看空间是否适合家人和行李。
这样筛选出来的结果更贴近日常生活。你会更清楚它是适合城市通勤、家庭代步、长途巡航,还是更适合作为一辆讲求个性的选择。
用车全周期指南
拥有 Audi RS Q8 的重点,是确认保险、路税、保养和轮胎成本都在可接受范围内。买车不是一次付款结束,而是每天都要相处。
如果你常跑南北大道,动力和座舱舒适度会比单纯低价更重要;如果主要在市区,停车灵活性、视野和低速顺滑度会更影响心情。

车型概览

Hyundai Stargazer 值不值得买,关键不是它看起来有多吸引,而是它能不能解决你的真实用车需求。这篇文章会把重点放在版本之间的取舍。
版本方面,Hyundai Stargazer 目前可围绕 2026 1.5L X 6 Seats、2026 1.5L Prime 7 Seats、2026 1.5L Style 7 Seats 来比较。
购车价格指南
评估 Hyundai Stargazer 的购车预算时,建议先从版本定位和后续拥车成本下手。价格不是唯一重点,真正决定是否划算的是每天会不会用到那些配置。
如果你在几个版本之间犹豫,可以把 2026 1.5L X 6 Seats、2026 1.5L Prime 7 Seats、2026 1.5L Style 7 Seats 放在同一张清单里比较。日常通勤买家优先看舒适与安全,常跑高速的买家则更应重视动力、辅助驾驶和座舱便利。
核心参数汇总

看 Hyundai Stargazer 的核心规格,最重要是把数字翻译成生活里的感受。
自然进气、4缸的动力底子,适合拿来判断市区跟车和高速巡航是否轻松。 156 Ps、143 N·m的输出,真正意义在于满载、上坡和超车时不会太吃力。 车长 4575 mm、车宽 1780 mm、车高 1695 mm、轴距 2780 mm,可以帮助你预判停车难度和后排乘坐空间。 CVT 变速箱 的设定,会影响起步顺滑度、湿地稳定感和长途巡航感。
优缺点分析
Hyundai Stargazer 的优点不必夸张,真正有价值的是它能不能让日常使用更省心:动力输出能支撑高速和超车需求、空间和车身尺寸便于家庭买家预判实用性。
需要留意的是,市区停车和狭窄路段仍要看个人驾驶习惯。这些不是扣分项,而是下订前应该先想清楚的生活细节。
购车常见问题解答
购买 Hyundai Stargazer 前,买家最常问的不是单一规格,而是它能不能融入自己的生活。
这辆车适合谁?适合把版本之间的取舍放在首位的买家。 家庭用户要看什么?优先看后排乘坐、儿童座椅、行李和日常上下车是否顺手。 每天开会不会麻烦?如果能源成本、停车便利和版本配置都符合你的生活节奏,它会比较容易相处。
竞品对比内容
把 Hyundai Stargazer 放进同级车名单时,不建议只看品牌或外形。真正有用的比较顺序是:再看动力是否足够应付高速和满载、最后看空间是否适合家人和行李。
这样筛选出来的结果更贴近日常生活。你会更清楚它是适合城市通勤、家庭代步、长途巡航,还是更适合作为一辆讲求个性的选择。
用车全周期指南
拥有 Hyundai Stargazer 的重点,是确认保险、路税、保养和轮胎成本都在可接受范围内。买车不是一次付款结束,而是每天都要相处。
如果你常跑南北大道,动力和座舱舒适度会比单纯低价更重要;如果主要在市区,停车灵活性、视野和低速顺滑度会更影响心情。

車型概覽

Neta V 值唔值買,關鍵唔係佢睇落嚟有多吸引,而係佢係咪能夠解決你嘅真實用車需求。呢篇文章會把重點放喺長途穩定感同乘客舒適度。
版本方面,Neta V 目前可圍繞 2025 380km Comfort 嚟比較。
購車價格指南
評估 Neta V 嘅購車預算時,建議先從版本定位同後續擁車成本落手。價格唔係唯一重點,真正決定係唔係划算嘅係每日係咪會用到嗰啲配置。
如果你喺幾個版本之間猶豫,可以把 2025 380km Comfort 放喺同一張清單入面比較。日常通勤買家優先睇舒適同安全,成日跑高速嘅買家則更應重視動力、輔助駕駛同車廂便利。
核心參數匯總

睇 Neta V 嘅核心規格,最重要係將數字轉化做生活裏嘅感受。
Neta V 嘅核心價值應回到日常場景判斷:你要佢負責通勤、家庭出行、長途,還是作為更有個性嘅選擇。
優缺點分析
Neta V 嘅優點唔使誇張,真正有價值嘅係佢係咪能夠令日常使用更省心:車型定位清晰,適合先作為同級比較對象。
需要留意嘅係,最終取舍會落喺版本配置、保險同長期保養成本。呢啲唔係扣分項,而係落訂前應該要先諗清楚嘅生活細節。
購車常見問題解答
購買 Neta V 前,買家最常問嘅唔係單一規格,而係佢係咪能夠融入你嘅生活。
呢輛車適合邊個?適合把長途穩定感同乘客舒適度放喺首位嘅買家。家庭用戶要睇啲咩?優先睇後排乘坐、兒童座椅、行李同日常上落車係咪順手。每日開會唔會麻煩?如果能源成本、停車便利同版本配置都符合你嘅生活節奏,佢會比較容易相處。
競爭對手對比內容
把 Neta V 放喺同級車名單時,唔建議只看品牌或外形。真正有用嘅比較順序係:由版本定位、品牌售後同日常用途開始比較。
咁樣篩選出嚟嘅結果更貼近日常生活。你會更加清楚佢係適合城市通勤、家庭代步、長途巡航,還是更加適合作為一輛講求個性嘅選擇。
用車全周期指南

擁有 Neta V 嘅重點,係確認保險、路稅、保養同輪胎成本都喺可接受範圍內。買車唔係一次付款就結束,而係每日都要相處。
如果你常跑南北大道,動力同座艙舒適度會比單純低價更重要;如果主要喺市區,停車靈活性、視野同低速順滑度會更加影響心情。

车型概览

XPeng G6 值不值得买,关键不是它看起来有多吸引,而是它能不能解决你的真实用车需求。这篇文章会把重点放在市区驾驶、停车和日常灵活性。 近期围绕这款车的讨论包括「KLIMS 2026: Xpeng G6 and the Smart EV's Calculated Mainstream Push」,说明它在本地买家视野里仍有关注度。
价格落在 RM 159,948 - 195,523,买家可以先用它判断预算压力和同级定位。
购车价格指南
XPeng G6 的购车预算可以先从 RM 159,948 - 195,523 开始衡量。这个数字真正影响的是月供、保险和现金流,而不只是展厅里的标价。
如果你在几个版本之间犹豫,可以把 2025 510km 4WD Black Edition(RM 195,523)、2025 510km 4WD Performance(RM 191,523)、2025 525km RWD Long Range(RM 180,013)、2025 480km RWD Standard Range(RM 159,948) 放在同一张清单里比较。日常通勤买家优先看舒适与安全,常跑高速的买家则更应重视动力、辅助驾驶和座舱便利。
核心参数汇总

看 XPeng G6 的核心规格,最重要是把数字翻译成生活里的感受。
80.8 kWh的电池容量,重点是能不能支撑一周通勤和周末出门。 18.4 kWh/100km的耗电表现,会影响你多久需要补一次电。 358 kW、660 N·m的输出,让高速并线和短距离超车更有底气。 车长 4758 mm、车宽 1920 mm、车高 1650 mm、轴距 2890 mm,可以帮助你预判停车难度和后排乘坐空间。
优缺点分析
XPeng G6 的优点不必夸张,真正有价值的是它能不能让日常使用更省心:预算位置清楚,方便和同级车直接比较、日常能源成本有明确参考、动力输出能支撑高速和超车需求。
需要留意的是,需要先确认家里、公司或常去商场的充电条件、市区停车和狭窄路段仍要看个人驾驶习惯。这些不是扣分项,而是下订前应该先想清楚的生活细节。
购车常见问题解答
购买 XPeng G6 前,买家最常问的不是单一规格,而是它能不能融入自己的生活。
这辆车适合谁?适合把市区驾驶、停车和日常灵活性放在首位的买家。 家庭用户要看什么?优先看后排乘坐、儿童座椅、行李和日常上下车是否顺手。 每天开会不会麻烦?只要充电条件稳定,电动车的通勤体验通常更安静,也更容易控制日常能源成本。
竞品对比内容
把 XPeng G6 放进同级车名单时,不建议只看品牌或外形。真正有用的比较顺序是:先用 RM 159,948 - 195,523 锁定预算圈、再看动力是否足够应付高速和满载、接着比较能源成本和补能便利、最后看空间是否适合家人和行李。
这样筛选出来的结果更贴近日常生活。你会更清楚它是适合城市通勤、家庭代步、长途巡航,还是更适合作为一辆讲求个性的选择。
用车全周期指南
![]()
拥有 XPeng G6 的关键,是先把充电安排想清楚。家充、公司充电或商场快充只要其中一项稳定,日常体验就会轻松很多。
如果你常跑南北大道,动力和座舱舒适度会比单纯低价更重要;如果主要在市区,停车灵活性、视野和低速顺滑度会更影响心情。

车型概览

Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 值不值得买,关键不是它看起来有多吸引,而是它能不能解决你的真实用车需求。这篇文章会把重点放在预算、贷款压力和同级价值。
价格落在 RM 398,888 - 485,888,买家可以先用它判断预算压力和同级定位。
购车价格指南
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 的购车预算可以先从 RM 398,888 - 485,888 开始衡量。这个数字真正影响的是月供、保险和现金流,而不只是展厅里的标价。
如果你在几个版本之间犹豫,可以把 2024 500 4MATIC SUV(RM 485,888)、2024 350+ SUV AMG Line(RM 448,888)、2024 350+ SUV Art Line(RM 398,888) 放在同一张清单里比较。日常通勤买家优先看舒适与安全,常跑高速的买家则更应重视动力、辅助驾驶和座舱便利。
核心参数汇总

看 Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 的核心规格,最重要是把数字翻译成生活里的感受。
300 kW的输出,让高速并线和短距离超车更有底气。 车长 4863 mm、车宽 2141 mm、车高 1685 mm,可以帮助你预判停车难度和后排乘坐空间。 固定齿比 变速箱、四轮驱动布局 的设定,会影响起步顺滑度、湿地稳定感和长途巡航感。
优缺点分析
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 的优点不必夸张,真正有价值的是它能不能让日常使用更省心:预算位置清楚,方便和同级车直接比较、动力输出能支撑高速和超车需求、空间和车身尺寸便于家庭买家预判实用性。
需要留意的是,需要先确认家里、公司或常去商场的充电条件、市区停车和狭窄路段仍要看个人驾驶习惯。这些不是扣分项,而是下订前应该先想清楚的生活细节。
购车常见问题解答
购买 Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 前,买家最常问的不是单一规格,而是它能不能融入自己的生活。
这辆车适合谁?适合把预算、贷款压力和同级价值放在首位的买家。 家庭用户要看什么?优先看后排乘坐、儿童座椅、行李和日常上下车是否顺手。 每天开会不会麻烦?只要充电条件稳定,电动车的通勤体验通常更安静,也更容易控制日常能源成本。
竞品对比内容
把 Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 放进同级车名单时,不建议只看品牌或外形。真正有用的比较顺序是:先用 RM 398,888 - 485,888 锁定预算圈、再看动力是否足够应付高速和满载、最后看空间是否适合家人和行李。
这样筛选出来的结果更贴近日常生活。你会更清楚它是适合城市通勤、家庭代步、长途巡航,还是更适合作为一辆讲求个性的选择。
用车全周期指南

拥有 Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 的关键,是先把充电安排想清楚。家充、公司充电或商场快充只要其中一项稳定,日常体验就会轻松很多。
如果你常跑南北大道,动力和座舱舒适度会比单纯低价更重要;如果主要在市区,停车灵活性、视野和低速顺滑度会更影响心情。

车型概览

Mercedes-Benz C-Class Electric 值不值得买,关键不是它看起来有多吸引,而是它能不能解决你的真实用车需求。这篇文章会把重点放在高速巡航、并线和超车信心。 近期围绕这款车的讨论包括「All-Electric Mercedes-Benz C-Class Makes Global Debut: The "Baby S-Class" Goes Electric with up to 762km Range」,说明它在本地买家视野里仍有关注度。
价格落在 RM 349,888,买家可以先用它判断预算压力和同级定位。
购车价格指南
Mercedes-Benz C-Class Electric 的购车预算可以先从 RM 349,888 开始衡量。这个数字真正影响的是月供、保险和现金流,而不只是展厅里的标价。
如果你在几个版本之间犹豫,可以把 2025 C 350 e AMG Line(RM 349,888) 放在同一张清单里比较。日常通勤买家优先看舒适与安全,常跑高速的买家则更应重视动力、辅助驾驶和座舱便利。
核心参数汇总

看 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Electric 的核心规格,最重要是把数字翻译成生活里的感受。
204 Ps的输出,让高速并线和短距离超车更有底气。 车长 4751 mm、车宽 1820 mm、车高 1442 mm,可以帮助你预判停车难度和后排乘坐空间。 自动变速箱 变速箱、后轮驱动布局 的设定,会影响起步顺滑度、湿地稳定感和长途巡航感。
优缺点分析
Mercedes-Benz C-Class Electric 的优点不必夸张,真正有价值的是它能不能让日常使用更省心:预算位置清楚,方便和同级车直接比较、日常能源成本有明确参考、动力输出能支撑高速和超车需求。
需要留意的是,需要先确认家里、公司或常去商场的充电条件、市区停车和狭窄路段仍要看个人驾驶习惯。这些不是扣分项,而是下订前应该先想清楚的生活细节。
购车常见问题解答
购买 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Electric 前,买家最常问的不是单一规格,而是它能不能融入自己的生活。
这辆车适合谁?适合把高速巡航、并线和超车信心放在首位的买家。 家庭用户要看什么?优先看后排乘坐、儿童座椅、行李和日常上下车是否顺手。 每天开会不会麻烦?7.7 L/100km 的油耗参考让通勤成本更容易预估。
竞品对比内容
把 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Electric 放进同级车名单时,不建议只看品牌或外形。真正有用的比较顺序是:先用 RM 349,888 锁定预算圈、再看动力是否足够应付高速和满载、接着比较能源成本和补能便利、最后看空间是否适合家人和行李。
这样筛选出来的结果更贴近日常生活。你会更清楚它是适合城市通勤、家庭代步、长途巡航,还是更适合作为一辆讲求个性的选择。
用车全周期指南

拥有 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Electric 的关键,是先把充电安排想清楚。家充、公司充电或商场快充只要其中一项稳定,日常体验就会轻松很多。
如果你常跑南北大道,动力和座舱舒适度会比单纯低价更重要;如果主要在市区,停车灵活性、视野和低速顺滑度会更影响心情。

车型概览

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque PHEV 值不值得买,关键不是它看起来有多吸引,而是它能不能解决你的真实用车需求。这篇文章会把重点放在版本之间的取舍。
版本方面,Land Rover Range Rover Evoque PHEV 目前可围绕 2025 Autobiography、2025 Dynamic SE 来比较。
购车价格指南
评估 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque PHEV 的购车预算时,建议先从版本定位和后续拥车成本下手。价格不是唯一重点,真正决定是否划算的是每天会不会用到那些配置。
如果你在几个版本之间犹豫,可以把 2025 Autobiography、2025 Dynamic SE 放在同一张清单里比较。日常通勤买家优先看舒适与安全,常跑高速的买家则更应重视动力、辅助驾驶和座舱便利。
核心参数汇总

看 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque PHEV 的核心规格,最重要是把数字翻译成生活里的感受。
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque PHEV 的核心价值应回到日常场景判断:你要它负责通勤、家庭出行、长途,还是作为更有个性的选择。
优缺点分析
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque PHEV 的优点不必夸张,真正有价值的是它能不能让日常使用更省心:车型定位清楚,适合先作为同级比较对象。
需要留意的是,最终取舍会落在版本配置、保险和长期保养成本。这些不是扣分项,而是下订前应该先想清楚的生活细节。
购车常见问题解答
购买 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque PHEV 前,买家最常问的不是单一规格,而是它能不能融入自己的生活。
这辆车适合谁?适合把版本之间的取舍放在首位的买家。 家庭用户要看什么?优先看后排乘坐、儿童座椅、行李和日常上下车是否顺手。 每天开会不会麻烦?如果能源成本、停车便利和版本配置都符合你的生活节奏,它会比较容易相处。
竞品对比内容
把 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque PHEV 放进同级车名单时,不建议只看品牌或外形。真正有用的比较顺序是:先从版本定位、品牌售后和日常用途开始比较。
这样筛选出来的结果更贴近日常生活。你会更清楚它是适合城市通勤、家庭代步、长途巡航,还是更适合作为一辆讲求个性的选择。
用车全周期指南
拥有 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque PHEV 的重点,是确认保险、路税、保养和轮胎成本都在可接受范围内。买车不是一次付款结束,而是每天都要相处。
如果你常跑南北大道,动力和座舱舒适度会比单纯低价更重要;如果主要在市区,停车灵活性、视野和低速顺滑度会更影响心情。

车型概览

Audi S3 值不值得买,关键不是它看起来有多吸引,而是它能不能解决你的真实用车需求。这篇文章会把重点放在它和同级车相比的生活适配度。
版本方面,Audi S3 目前可围绕 2025 Sedan quattro、2025 Sportback quattro 来比较。
购车价格指南
评估 Audi S3 的购车预算时,建议先从版本定位和后续拥车成本下手。价格不是唯一重点,真正决定是否划算的是每天会不会用到那些配置。
如果你在几个版本之间犹豫,可以把 2025 Sedan quattro、2025 Sportback quattro 放在同一张清单里比较。日常通勤买家优先看舒适与安全,常跑高速的买家则更应重视动力、辅助驾驶和座舱便利。
核心参数汇总

看 Audi S3 的核心规格,最重要是把数字翻译成生活里的感受。
Audi S3 的核心价值应回到日常场景判断:你要它负责通勤、家庭出行、长途,还是作为更有个性的选择。
优缺点分析
Audi S3 的优点不必夸张,真正有价值的是它能不能让日常使用更省心:车型定位清楚,适合先作为同级比较对象。
需要留意的是,最终取舍会落在版本配置、保险和长期保养成本。这些不是扣分项,而是下订前应该先想清楚的生活细节。
购车常见问题解答
购买 Audi S3 前,买家最常问的不是单一规格,而是它能不能融入自己的生活。
这辆车适合谁?适合把它和同级车相比的生活适配度放在首位的买家。 家庭用户要看什么?优先看后排乘坐、儿童座椅、行李和日常上下车是否顺手。 每天开会不会麻烦?如果能源成本、停车便利和版本配置都符合你的生活节奏,它会比较容易相处。
竞品对比内容
把 Audi S3 放进同级车名单时,不建议只看品牌或外形。真正有用的比较顺序是:先从版本定位、品牌售后和日常用途开始比较。
这样筛选出来的结果更贴近日常生活。你会更清楚它是适合城市通勤、家庭代步、长途巡航,还是更适合作为一辆讲求个性的选择。
用车全周期指南
拥有 Audi S3 的重点,是确认保险、路税、保养和轮胎成本都在可接受范围内。买车不是一次付款结束,而是每天都要相处。
如果你常跑南北大道,动力和座舱舒适度会比单纯低价更重要;如果主要在市区,停车灵活性、视野和低速顺滑度会更影响心情。

On May 27, the all-new MG 4X officially launched. Among them, the all-new MG 4X 510 Semi-Solid Intelligent Enjoyment Edition and the all-new MG 4X 610 Intelligent Enjoyment Edition are equipped with the Horizon Robotics Journey®6E intelligent driving chip. As the optimal computing solution for highway NOA, the Journey®6E brings cross-level advanced intelligent driving experience to mainstream family pure electric models. This cooperation marks another deep collaboration between Horizon Robotics and SAIC Motor Group after the Journey®6E was equipped in multiple popular models under SAIC Group in August 2025, further confirming the product strength and market recognition of the Journey®6E.

Journey®6E Hardcore Boost
Setting the Benchmark for Home Vehicle Intelligent Driving
As a quality driving fun pure electric SUV for family users, the all-new MG 4X is built on SAIC's Nebula Pure Electric Exclusive Architecture. The new car adopts a rear-motor rear-drive layout and five-link independent suspension, with a stable chassis and smooth handling, adapting to multi-scenario travel such as city commuting and family outings; The maximum CLTC range reaches 610 kilometers. The interior adopts an enveloping light luxury layout combined with a high-definition central control screen, balancing practicality, comfort, and safety, bringing a cross-level driving experience for family users.
In terms of intelligent assisted driving capabilities, the MG 4X is based on the Horizon Robotics Journey®6E intelligent driving chip, paired with a game theory large model that better understands Chinese road conditions. Highway NOA can accurately predict the intentions of traffic participants and actively avoid obstacles, significantly reducing driving fatigue; Intelligent parking supports DIY parking, dead-end road parking, low-speed real-time parking lot search and other all-scenario capabilities, making every parking maneuver convenient, efficient, calm, and worry-free.

As the core computing power base for whole-vehicle intelligence, the Journey®6E is equipped with Horizon Robotics' third-generation BPU Nash architecture, natively supports highway NOA functionality, and Transformer computing efficiency is 10 times higher than the previous generation, capable of efficiently supporting real-time large model computation. The chip adopts a high-integration automotive-grade design, supporting passive heat dissipation and low-power stable operation, perfectly adapting to 4D millimeter-wave radar and 8-megapixel sensor fusion solutions, providing reliable protection for assisted driving.
Nine-Year Deep Strategic Cooperation
Horizon Robotics Continuously Assists SAIC Motor Group in Intelligent Driving Upgrade
The cooperation between Horizon Robotics and SAIC Motor Group began in 2017 and has now formed a deeply bound strategic partnership. In 2019, SAIC Motor Group participated in Horizon Robotics' Series B financing; the following year, both parties jointly established the SAIC-Horizon Robotics Joint Laboratory, laying the foundation for long-term cooperative R&D.
In terms of mass production landing, from the Journey®2 and Journey®3 achieving mass production of L2 level assisted driving in 2022, to the Journey®6 series equipping SAIC mid-to-high-end intelligent driving platforms in 2025, both parties' cooperation continues to advance. This all-new MG 4X relies on the Horizon Robotics Journey®6E intelligent driving chip, bringing the highway NOA experience to a more mainstream family vehicle market, accelerating the popularization process of high-level intelligent driving.
In terms of global layout, the MG ES5 model cooperated by both parties is equipped with the Journey®3 intelligent driving chip and has been launched in many countries including the UK, Thailand, and Chile, achieving mass production of Horizon Robotics' intelligent driving solutions on export vehicles. In the future, Horizon Robotics will continue to empower SAIC's all-scenario NOA high-level solutions, bringing Chinese intelligent driving technology to a broader international market.
Further Expansion of Mass Production Map
Journey®6 Series Accelerates the Process of Intelligent Driving Popularization
The launch of the all-new MG 4X means the Horizon Robotics Journey®6 series mass production map has captured another city. Currently, the Journey®6 series has achieved full matrix, cross-brand, and comprehensive coverage domestically and internationally. Multiple chips in the full series have secured over 40 cooperative brands and over 400 vehicle model designations, serving over 6 million car owners, and are simultaneously equipped on multiple export vehicles, with landings fully rolled out both domestically and internationally.
As the only chip solution domestically that meets the mass production requirements of full-stage assisted driving, the Journey®6 series computing power covers 10TOPS-560TOPS and can flexibly adapt to the intelligent driving needs of vehicles at different price levels and classes. As of August 2025, the shipment volume of Horizon Robotics' Journey family chips has broken through 10 million sets. Technical maturity and product stability lead the industry, providing car companies with an efficient and reliable intelligent driving computing base.

Facing the future, Horizon Robotics will take the software and hardware integrated technical base and 10 million-level mass production strength as the cornerstone, join hands with SAIC Motor Group and more car companies, accelerate the popularization process of intelligent driving technology, and let Chinese intelligent driving solutions drive towards a broader world stage.

On the occasion of the brand's fifth anniversary, Avatr Technology is entering a new stage where development momentum is fully unleashed. Currently, its cumulative sales have exceeded 250,000 units, establishing a solid position in the high-end intelligent electric vehicle market. With the continuous improvement of the product matrix, the accelerated implementation of core technologies, and the in-depth promotion of overseas layout, Avatr not only achieved overall profitability but also demonstrated strong growth resilience and brand vitality. As the largest external shareholder of Huawei Invision, Avatr will continue to benefit from the synergy dividends of the intelligent ecosystem, driving the brand toward higher-order development.

In the five years since establishment, Avatr has successively launched multiple models such as Avatr 11, 12, 06/06T, 07, covering a price range of 200,000 to 700,000 RMB. In the second half of this year, Avatr will also launch Avatr 07L and a brand new large six-seater flagship SUV. The latter will be the industry's first to equip CATL condensation state batteries, further raising the product ceiling and expanding market coverage. According to the plan, by 2030, Avatr will complete the layout of 17 products, comprehensively covering SUVs, sedans, MPVs, and other sub-segments. Overseas expansion has also progressed rapidly. Since going global in 2024, Avatr has entered more than 40 countries and regions worldwide. Not only did it firmly hold the top spot in Thailand's high-end electric vehicle sales, but it also secured a 10% share of the high-end market in the UAE, and the global layout has taken initial shape. This year, Avatr will officially enter the European market, further accelerating the penetration of the global high-end market, planning to cover more than 110 countries and regions by 2030, with overseas sales accounting for 40%.


Behind the brand's rapid growth is the continuous intensification of Changan Automobile's strategic empowerment to Avatr. As the core carrier of Changan Automobile's high-end strategy, Avatr carries the mission of breaking through upwards and building a global high-end brand. In April this year, Changan Automobile announced that Avatr and Deepal Automobile would launch strategic synergy, following the principle of "Front-end independence, Mid-end and Back-end synergy, Brand independent operation", further enhancing Avatr's strategic weight, with group-wide resources possibly continuing to tilt towards it. As the "flagship and benchmark" of the brand group, while the three major systems of brand operation, channel operation, and user service remain unchanged for Avatr, the high-end positioning is becoming increasingly solid. After the synergy implementation, efficiency and system capabilities are further amplified, providing a solid backing for the brand's long-term development.


In addition, Avatr's unique advantages backed by the "Big Three" of Changan, Huawei, and CATL are still deepening, building a unique technical and resource barrier. Based on Changan's century-old manufacturing heritage, Avatr has independently researched two core technologies: Kunlun Intelligent Range Extender and Taihang Smart Control Chassis. The iterated Taihang Smart Control Chassis 2.0 achieves dual advancement in safety and handling with industry-leading distributed electric drive technology. At the same time, as a "technical shareholder" of Huawei and CATL, Avatr not only enjoys priority access to the latest technologies but also partners with them to define every new technology from the source. Avatr, as the largest external shareholder of Huawei Invision, has formed an interest community bonded by capital and continues to enjoy development dividends. CATL, as Avatr's second largest shareholder, has always prioritized mounting front-line battery technologies such as Shenxing, Xiaoyao, and Condensation State on Avatr models, ensuring product strength remains at the forefront of the industry.
Standing at a new milestone of the fifth anniversary, Avatr — this young "New Luxury" brand — is steadily walking the path of sustainable growth of "Original, Intelligent, New Luxury" with clearer product strategy, deeper technical cooperation, and more firm global layout. As a core strategic asset of Changan Automobile, Avatr is constantly consolidating its core competitiveness facing the future and releasing long-term value.

When Wang Xiaoqiu handed the unique "100 Millionth Vehicle" premium customized car model from SAIC Group to Momenta CEO Cao Xudong, there was no deliberate emotional countdown on site, nor a constantly jumping digital screen.

That was a collector's commemorative car model specially created for the "100 Millionth Vehicle", quietly displayed under the spotlight. The camera panned over the scene, some raised phones to take photos, some clapped, and others chatted in whispers. Compared to the usual "milestone moments" of many companies, this ceremony seemed even somewhat restrained.
But precisely this restraint made the event of the "100 Millionth Vehicle" itself appear exceptionally authentic.
Because everyone knows, this is not just SAIC's "100 Millionth Vehicle", in a sense, it is also the "100 Millionth Vehicle" of the Chinese automotive industry.
From producing the first Phoenix sedan by the Huangpu River to Chinese carmakers crossing the "100 Million" threshold for the first time today, the Chinese automotive industry took over 70 years. Rather than "how far we've gone", what outsiders care about more is actually another question: After reaching today, where will the Chinese automotive industry go next?
This is also the true meaning of this delivery ceremony. It seemingly looks back at history, but in reality, it always discusses the future.
Industrial Changes Within a Delivery Ceremony
If you look closely at this livestream, you will find an interesting detail: it did not unfold in the manner of a traditional car launch event. There were no long-term data displays, nor dense parameter explanations. Instead, the entire livestream was more like a "relay" constantly switching scenes.
Shanghai, Liuzhou, London, Jakarta, Singapore... different brands, different models, different users, connected into the same narrative.
And these users are not just car buyers in the traditional sense. Some are tech bloggers, some are public welfare creators, some are overseas young users, some are logistics enterprises, and others are founders of intelligent driving companies.
This arrangement itself actually sufficiently explains the changes in the automotive industry today. In the past, cars were more standardized industrial products, but today, they are beginning to become an entry point connecting lifestyles, technology ecosystems, and intelligent capabilities.
So, why is the 100 Millionth Vehicle the IM LS9 Hyper?
Because it is not a model that solely emphasizes sales significance, nor is it an old car symbolizing "historical collection", but a smart electric vehicle representing SAIC's most core direction today.
It integrates not only new energy powertrains, but also intelligent driving, software architecture, AI interaction, and ecosystem synergy capabilities. In other words, SAIC did not keep the "100 Millionth Vehicle" merely as a tribute to the past, but clearly pointed it towards the future.
The Automotive Industry Is No Longer Traditional Manufacturing
During the livestream, SAIC Group Vice President and Chief Engineer Zu Shijie reviewed SAIC's 70-year development process. He actually did not over-emphasize the keyword "100 Millionth Vehicle", but summarized the whole process into three stages: exploration in the beginning before Reform and Opening-up, joint venture cooperation after Reform and Opening-up, and the development of independent brands starting around 2000.
From Phoenix, to Santana, to Roewe, MG, IM, this actually corresponds to the tasks of different stages of the Chinese automotive industry. First, it was building an industrial foundation; later, it was learning the modern automotive industry system; and subsequently, it was forming its own R&D, brand, and technology capabilities.
And today, the Chinese automotive industry has clearly entered a new stage. In this stage, the question is no longer "whether we can make cars", but: Who should ultimately define the car of the future?
And the various SAIC cars delivered during the livestream may be the answer given by SAIC.
They represent SAIC's judgment, and even the Chinese automotive industry's judgment on the direction of competition in the next stage: Intelligent electric vehicles are becoming a new core competitive field for car companies.
Automotive industry expert Zhao Fuquan said a sentence worth pondering repeatedly: "The automotive industry is no longer traditional manufacturing."
He said that the current automotive industry has changed from the originally simple upstream and downstream relationships into an ecosystemized industry. It involves not only manufacturing but also communication, transportation, urban construction, AI, and the integration of more intelligent industries.
This sentence is the core of the entire industry's change today.
In the past, the most important capabilities of a car were the engine, transmission, and chassis; later, it was the battery, motor, and electronic control; but today, what more and more consumers truly perceive has become intelligent driving, cockpit interaction, software experience, AI capabilities, and continuous OTA iterations of the whole vehicle.
Cars are turning from "mechanical products" into "smart terminals", and this change is also reshaping the automotive enterprises themselves.
Joint Venture 2.0, Not Just "Cooperation"
In the livestream, Zu Shijie said that after entering the intelligent electric era, SAIC's cooperation with global brands has entered the "co-creation" stage. This is actually very important, because for many years in the past, when outsiders talked about the Chinese automotive industry, they always mentioned a sentence: "Market for Technology".
But today, this logic has begun to change. The Chinese market is no longer just a place for global car companies to sell products; it is beginning to become a place to define products.
The reason is actually simple: the world's most complete new energy industry chain is in China; the most fierce intelligent driving competition is in China; the largest smart electric vehicle consumption market is also in China. Therefore, whether it is Volkswagen, Audi, or General Motors, they must all re-understand the Chinese market.
This change is already very obvious in the models delivered that day. AUDI E7X, Buick Zhijing Family, Volkswagen ID. ERA 9X. These products are no longer simple "global model localization" as in the past; they are increasingly deeply integrated into China's intelligent ecosystem, Chinese user needs, and Chinese technical capabilities.
So, talking about "Joint Ventures" today is actually not one-way input, but both parties jointly defining the next generation of products. In a sense, this is also a reflection of the changing position of the Chinese automotive industry.
In the past, the Chinese automotive industry was mostly "learning"; today, Chinese enterprises began to participate in "defining"; and in the future, the Chinese automotive industry will further participate in shaping global intelligent mobility rules and technology directions.
From "Scale" to "Capability"
Interestingly, in the livestream, whether it was Zu Shijie or several experts, they all repeatedly mentioned one word: Ecosystem.
Zu Shijie mentioned that SAIC and Huawei actually started cooperating very early, with a lot of communication since the 5G communication era. Later, with the development of intelligent cars, the cooperation between the two sides naturally became deeper and deeper.
He said that car products have already undergone great changes now; communication technology, internet technology, and electronics technology will all be used in cars. "No single company can do it all." Therefore, we need to jointly make the Chinese new energy intelligent car ecosystem well.
This sentence is actually very realistic. Because in the intelligent car era, it is already very difficult to rely on a single enterprise to build all capabilities.
In the past, traditional car companies were more like a closed system, with the core of competition being manufacturing scale and supply chain efficiency; but today, the automotive industry is becoming more like an open platform. Chips, AI, algorithms, software, cloud, maps, communication... every link requires a new collaborative relationship.
This also means that the Chinese automotive industry is moving from "scale competition" to "capability competition".
In the past years, the Chinese automotive industry has already proved one thing: China can build an automotive industry of world-class scale. The "100 Millionth Vehicle" itself is a concentrated embodiment of this industrial capability.
But today's problem has already changed. Next, the contest is no longer just output, sales, and market share, but who can establish truly sustainable technical capabilities; who can form a global brand; who can master the discourse power of the next generation of intelligent cars; and who can truly integrate manufacturing, software, AI, and ecosystem.
Therefore, today's competition is becoming less and less like the past "company versus company" competition, and more like "ecosystem versus ecosystem" competition. Who can organize more capabilities, who can form more efficient synergy, who can truly establish long-term advantages.
This is also why, the 100 Millionth User choosing Cao Xudong appears symbolic. Because it actually expresses: One of the most important competitive strengths of the future automotive industry is ecosystem capability. And the reason SAIC chose IM LS9 Hyper as the 100 Millionth Vehicle to deliver is precisely because it is itself a product of this capability system.
It is not the result of a single manufacturing capability, but the result of smart driving, AI algorithms, software platforms, supply chain systems, and user data collaborating together.
In a sense, it is more like a "mobile smart terminal", not just a car in the traditional sense.
This is also why, although the entire delivery ceremony constantly reviewed history, it always carried a strong sense of "futurity". Because today's Chinese automotive industry has already reached a new node.
The future will not arrive automatically; it is shaped through repeated technology iterations, industry synergies, and user choices.
