HomeFord Mustang
Search History
Popular Searches
Dealer Login / Sign Up
Countless business histories prove that the moment everyone recognizes the landscape is unbreakable, the true breaker-out will grow in the cracks.
When a mature market truly undergoes qualitative change, it is often not because a new product appeared, but because the name of the number one changed. Tesla in the automotive industry, Apple in smartphones, DJI in drones, all are like this.
Against the backdrop of countless box-style products emerging and the light off-road track becoming increasingly crowded, such moments of symbolic significance are also arriving successively.
In June 2026, the BJ30 Traveller achieved a monthly sales volume of 8,609 units, topping the sales list of the 100,000-level light off-road box-style market under the same caliber statistics; in the same month, the 150,000th vehicle officially came off the line, becoming the model in China's light off-road SUV that reached 150,000 sales fastest.
The BJ30 Traveller accumulated 150,000 units of sales in less than two years, such a growth speed is not common even in the entire box-style track. But if understanding these merely as an overtake, it undoubtedly underestimates its significance.
Just as BJ40 firmly stays first in the hardcore off-road market, and BJ40 EREV also dominates the EREV box-style market similarly, on a track where competition continues to heat up, true overtaking has never been about chasing opponents, but redefining the endpoint of competition.
BJ40 precisely cracked the 'scenario fragmentation' pain point long existing in the hardcore off-road market, while BJ30 Traveller redefines, not the ceiling of a single parameter, but what kind of user a 100,000-level light off-road SUV should be for, what kind of problems to solve, and what kind of value to create. Along with this, it also redefines the relationship between off-roading and family—they have never been an either-or choice, but a lifestyle that can achieve each other and empower each other.
Therefore, the peak of the BJ30 Traveller is an even clearer signal that under the iteration of competition logic, the light off-road box-style market has entered a new competition cycle.
A New Interpretation of Energy Conservation in Light Off-roading
In the light off-road track of the past few years, it seems to adhere to an iron rule: the stronger the off-road parameters, the higher the product value.
But under the iteration of consumer groups, the track logic has welcomed a fundamental shift. For the vast majority of users, off-roading is just going wild occasionally, not climbing mountains every week. The value standard deciding light off-road is not simply how high the limit of off-road capability is, but whether it can achieve balance among various scenarios like off-roading, urban commuting, and family travel.
On June 12, at the BAIC Zhuzhou Super Factory, the BJ30 Traveller used an all-network public teardown to hand in a set of brand new problem-solving ideas.
Under the live streaming lens, the key component status of this car was laid bare before the audience one by one: engine turbo carbon deposits are extremely few, transmission casing has no oil leakage, internal gears have no wear pits, battery pack has no bulging, liquid leakage, or degradation, sub-frame and suspension arms have no rust or oil seepage.
What the teardown truly validates is not just the mechanical status after 150,000 kilometers, but the balance of a HEV light off-road model in long-term, multi-scenario usage.
Currently, the light off-road market has multiple technical routes. Pure electric power is quiet, smooth, and responds directly, but energy replenishment highly relies on charging facilities; for plug-in hybrid vehicles, after the battery runs out, fuel consumption performance and driving texture will both show obvious slumps.
In comparison, HEV is actually a more balanced choice. No charging piles needed, no range anxiety, fuel up and go; at low speed the motor startup is light and quick with direct response, during cruising the engine runs efficiently, balancing fuel economy.
This balance, in essence, is a response to users' real life scenarios. Not performing outstanding only in one scenario, but able to switch freely between daily life and distance—no awkwardness on workdays, no nervousness on holidays.
Of course, we must also avoid a 'concept trap'.
The 'Light' in 'Light Off-roading', many mistakenly think means reducing off-road performance. In fact, the 'Light' here lowers the experience threshold, not product capability. Although consumers may not challenge extreme road conditions every day, they still hope the vehicle has reliable passability in complex scenarios like muddy ground, gravel roads, wet slippery tracks.
Just as BJ30 chose 'Triple Power', instead of the more common 'Double Power' on the market, it also lies in the understanding of off-road capability.
Double power hybrid systems represented by Toyota THS, Honda i-MMD are already mature enough in urban commuting scenarios, but for a light off-road positioned SUV, the double power architecture with only front drive motors, when facing low adhesion road conditions like cross-axles, mud, gravel roads, still has certain limitations in power response and four-wheel drive distribution.
The Triple Power Four-Wheel Drive Six-Mode HEV Hybrid System equipped on BJ30 Traveller, the whole system consists of a hybrid dedicated engine with thermal efficiency reaching 41%, front drive motor and rear axle drive motor. The three power sources each have their own duties: engine responsible for high-speed cruising and continuous output, front motor bears daily driving like startup, acceleration, rear motor is when vehicle needs recovery, climbing, or driving on unpaved roads, provides stronger low-speed torque and rear-wheel drive power.
Matching the only 'Three Major Components for Travelling Off-roading' in the same class: Electric 4WD, Energy Center Lock, ATS All-Terrain Control System, equivalent to equipping the vehicle with a 'Smart Brain', can automatically identify slipping wheels and transfer power instantly to wheels with adhesion, achieving easy recovery, making the journey worry-free.
Off-roading is capability, Life is the Purpose
Regardless of which route, the power form is never the goal, but the means.
In the auto circle of these few years, it always gives people a feeling of 'over-hyped', more and more technologies, configurations and concepts are stacked endlessly, but may not truly solve users' actual needs. But humans are the measure of all things, truly top-tier technology never obsesses over so-called 'Disruption', but without needing users to bow down to accommodate, whether power form, space configuration, like electric power, they are quietly and deeply supporting, proactively holding up our lives.
Especially for family users, an excellent light off-road, besides answering which technical route is more balanced, also needs to answer three more realistic questions: whether it saves more when driving, whether it's more comfortable when sitting, whether it carries more.
Solving these is the most powerful annotation of 'Disruption'.
Previously, BJ30 Traveller conducted real-world fuel consumption tests in multiple countries overseas, participated by auto bloggers from five countries: South Africa, Indonesia, UAE, Poland, Mexico. Test scenarios included urban congestion, highway cruising, unpaved roads, long-distance self-driving and complex weather, far more close to light off-road users' daily life than standard conditions. Finally, BJ30 Traveller's measured 100km fuel consumption in every country was all below 5L.
Converting this measured data into usage costs, calculated based on driving 15,000 kilometers a year, BJ30 Traveller compared to same-level fuel SUV, can save about 4,000 yuan in fuel costs annually—even compared with many A0-class small cars, its usage cost is still more advantageous.
If low usage cost lowers the ownership threshold, then space determines whether a car can truly integrate into family life.
Family users' demand for space, is not 'big enough', but 'flexible enough'. This also redefines what truly valuable space means: not just dimensional advantages, more in letting families, when facing various 'planned' and 'unplanned', have stronger calm response ability.
The BJ30 Traveller's thinking style is very direct: rather than making space a book advantage, better to turn it into an experience advantage. 2820mm wheelbase, 3-row 7-seat layout and 66% usable space ratio, ensures that every family member can have reasonable seating space when fully loaded; 978mm rear legroom combined with more spacious third row, as much as eliminate the compromise feeling of traditional 7-seat SUV 'Third row is only for emergency'.
Scenarios most commonly encountered by family cars, often are sudden large item moving, temporarily increased travel numbers, or spontaneous short-term camping.
After BJ30 Traveller second row seats folded down, can form 1496L flat loading space. Whether large furniture, appliances during moving, or camping gear, skiing equipment, can easily accommodate; return trip parents stuffed local specialties, Sam's Club etc. warehouse store purchased large items also no need to worry about loading space. Whole car 38 storage spaces, let water cups, umbrellas, documents, computers etc. daily items each have their place.
The recently launched BJ30 Traveller Highlight Edition, is another extension of product value boundaries.
The Highlight Edition adds exclusive paint, fashion modification kit, Star ring hubcaps and orange interior, further emphasizing youthfulness and personalized expression; seat heating and ventilation, steering wheel heating, rain sensing auto window close, 64-color ambient lights, HiFi audio etc. comfort config additions, further improved daily usage quality feeling.
And when a car truly integrates into life scenarios, in every high-frequency usage moment making people feel 'chose right', recognition will naturally precipitate into word of mouth, word of mouth further converts into recommendation. Looking further out, it changes not only a product's market value, but also upgrading consumers' value cognition on light off-roading, a new life travel mode.
The Endgame of Products is Always User Value
Everyone says in this impetuous era, mindshare is the last battle. What is mindshare? Traffic recedes, noise dissipates, the precipitated value is probably mindshare.
Currently, total traffic peaks, per capita attention continues to be scarce, user perception of marketing information also becomes increasingly fatigued. Truly able to cross cycles, continuously growing brands, often are not brands most good at chasing traffic, but those able to continuously occupy user mindshare.
In the final analysis, it is standing with users.
Many people think a car's word of mouth starts after listing. But for BJ30 Traveller, its word of mouth, actually started brewing before the product was born.
Several years ago, box-style started becoming market hot spot, at that time each car enterprise almost put attention on larger sizes, stronger 4WD, higher passability on, industry competition constantly upgrading to 'Harder'.
However, in auto forums, social platform comment sections, users discussed another matter.
'If only box-style cars could save fuel like hybrid cars.' 'Why can't there be a box-style that doesn't need charging, has 4WD, and low fuel consumption?'
These voices seem scattered, but reflect a newly forming new demand: what consumers want is not a more extreme off-road vehicle, but a light off-road SUV that can truly integrate into daily life.
BJ30 Traveller choosing the HEV route, launching domestic first HEV hybrid box-style, is precisely a response to this demand—in other words, it is not defining demand, but discovering demand.
Beijing Off-road did not treat product launch as the end point, but regarded it as the beginning of continuous iteration.
There is user feedback, hope to further improve battery durability during long-term vehicle use. Less than a product cycle, this suggestion was reflected on BJ30 Traveller Highlight Edition—new car upgraded mounting long-life dedicated AGM battery, cycle life reaches 3 times of ordinary battery.
Such changes seem like just a component upgrade, behind which reflects the change of product development ideas: not enterprise defining what users need, but letting users participate in product growth.
This continuous 'listen to advice' ability, also gradually precipitated into BJ30 Traveller's word of mouth asset. According to data released by China Automobile Dealers Association, BJ30 Traveller with 69.5% retention rate ranks first among 100,000-150,000 yuan independent compact SUV retention rate.
BJ30 Traveller is also continuously extending user experience. At the purchasing link, Beijing Off-road launched '30,000 Super Trade-in Policy', trade-in users and new purchase users can both enjoy. BJ30 Traveller whole series super trade-in price as low as starting at 69,900 yuan, pulling hardcore box-style SUV entry threshold to 70,000-level price range.
Looking back, BJ30 Traveller's growth trajectory, actually formed a clear development logic: insight real demand, quickly respond demand, continuously iterate product, then through user word of mouth complete value precipitation. Sales, retention rate and user recognition, seem to be three independent results, essentially are answers after the same set of product logic constantly verified by market.
This path, might become the whole industry's reference template, therefore worth deconstructing, continue to focus.
After all, number one will eventually constantly replace, but truly able to change industry, has always been that set of new value standards behind the list. And this, might be BJ30 Traveller ascending 100,000-level light off-road box-style market, most weighty era significance.
Pada pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli ketika memilih kereta sering membandingkan Perodua Ativa dan Chery Tiggo 7 Pro.
Harga OTR Perodua Ativa di Malaysia ialah RM 62,500 - 73,400, terdapat keseluruhan 3 varian, termasuk 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Chery Tiggo 7 Pro di Malaysia ialah RM 123,750 - 123,750, terdapat keseluruhan 2 varian, termasuk 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 125,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 140,000) dan lain-lain.
Dilihat dari harga, harga permulaan Perodua Ativa memang lebih murah RM 61,250 daripada Chery Tiggo 7 Pro. Jika bajet anda terhad, versi masuk Perodua sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Tetapi hendaklah diingat, perbezaan harga beberapa ribu itu, mungkin ada pengorbanan pada kelengkapan, bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Perodua Ativa dilengkapi enjin 1.5L 4-silinder, kuasa 105 hp. Penggunaan bahan api rasmi 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro dilengkapi enjin 1.5L Turbo, kuasa 140 hp. Penggunaan bahan api rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Dari segi kuasa, enjin 1.5L Turbo Chery Tiggo 7 Pro mempunyai 35 kuasa kuda lebih daripada enjin 1.5L 4-silinder Perodua Ativa. Namun untuk penggunaan harian di bandar, kuasa kedua-dua kereta ini sudah memadai, tidak akan terasa kurang kuasa.
Penarafan keselamatan Perodua Ativa ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA.
Penarafan keselamatan Chery Tiggo 7 Pro ialah TBD, sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk Basic.
Dari segi kelengkapan keselamatan, kedua-dua kereta ini telah mendapat penarafan yang baik. Walau bagaimanapun, ada perbezaan fungsi antara ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA Perodua Ativa dan Basic Chery Tiggo 7 Pro, jika anda mengutamakan keselamatan aktif, boleh bandingkan senarai fungsi keduanya dengan teliti.
Panjang badan Perodua Ativa 4400 mm, ruang beg 400 L.
Panjang badan Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 4400 mm, ruang beg 400 L.
Saiz kedua-dua kereta ini hampir sama, ruang dalam kereta tidak banyak berbeza. Kereta dalam kelas ini sudah cukup untuk penggunaan harian.
Perodua Ativa dan Chery Tiggo 7 Pro sama-sama pilihan utama di pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga, perjalanan harian. Jika anda lebih mengutamakan reputasi jenama dan nilai jualan semula, boleh utamakan dahulu model yang mempunyai reputasi lebih baik; jika anda lebih mementingkan nilai harga dan kelengkapan, maka pilih yang mempunyai kelengkapan lebih banyak. Akhir sekali disarankan untuk mencuba kedua-dua model, pengalaman sendiri adalah yang paling penting.
Secara keseluruhannya, Perodua Ativa dan Chery Tiggo 7 Pro sama-sama model yang sangat bagus di pasaran Malaysia. Pemilihan mana satu, penting lihat keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Disarankan untuk membuat kajian, bandingkan beberapa tawaran dari agensi kereta, baru buat keputusan akhir setelah ujian memandu. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa untuk membuat kajian tidak akan salah.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Perodua Ativa 同 Mazda CX-30 嚟比較。呢兩部車喺價同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Ativa 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 62,500 - 73,400，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.0L Turbo X（RM 62,500）、1.0L Turbo H（RM 67,300）、1.0L Turbo AV（RM 73,400） 等。
Mazda CX-30 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 122,409 - 146,409，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L High+ Premium（RM 146,409）、2025 2.0L High+（RM 138,409）、2025 2.0L High（RM 130,409） 等。
從價錢睇落，Perodua Ativa 嘅起步價確實比 Mazda CX-30 便宜咗 RM 59,909。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，便宜嘅嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Perodua Ativa 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Mazda CX-30 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Mazda CX-30 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Perodua Ativa 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Perodua Ativa 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-30 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要看品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問問真實車主嘅經驗。
Perodua Ativa 同 Mazda CX-30 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終仲係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總嘅嚟講，Perodua Ativa 同 Mazda CX-30 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行之報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Ativa and Proton X70 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Ativa's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 62,500 - 73,400, with a total of 3 variants, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400), etc.
Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 variants, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Perodua Ativa is indeed RM 44,300 cheaper than Proton X70. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the savings of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.
Perodua Ativa's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA.
Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive in this segment. New cars nowadays generally have good safety, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Perodua Ativa body length is 4400 mm, trunk capacity 400 L.
Proton X70 body length is 4400 mm, trunk capacity 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. Cars in this segment are fully sufficient for daily use.
Perodua Ativa adopts FWD drive mode.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, so the daily driving experience will not differ significantly.
Overall, Perodua Ativa and Proton X70 are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several car dealerships, and test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will definitely not go wrong.
July 8, 2026, the global leading physical AI company Momenta officially listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, stock code 6880.HK, becoming the 'first physical AI stock'. Trading was hot at the first-day opening, stock price surged over 6% at open, total market cap broke through 70 billion HKD.
According to the placement results announced by Momenta earlier, the listing price is 295.6 HKD/share. Assuming the 'greenshoe' (oversubscription option) is fully exercised, the global offering is approximately 22.93 million shares, with total fundraising amounting to approximately 6.8 billion HKD. Market subscription response was enthusiastic: public offering part received 414 times oversubscription; international offering part received over 100 billion HKD in institutional orders, covering sovereign funds and long-term funds from 15 countries and regions. Total subscription oversubscription (excluding cornerstone, before greenshoe) reached approximately 44 times.
It is reported that Momenta's anchor subscription lineup this time is luxurious, including Singapore Government Investment Corporation (GIC), Fidelity International, BlackRock Group, Franklin Templeton Funds Group, Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA), Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB), Temasek, Wellington, Schroders, and other top global institutions; at the same time, the all-round optimism from domestic long-term capital further confirms Momenta's core status and strategic value in the domestic market: domestic top long-term private equity, public funds, and insurance capital gathered rarely, forming a solid local capital base. Only long-term fund subscription amount exceeded 15 times, showing confidence of global long-term investors in Momenta's long-term value. Additionally, it is learned that Momenta's IPO this time introduced 14 institutions to form an ultra-luxurious cornerstone investor lineup, with cornerstone subscription total approximately 3 billion HKD (approximately $376 million). The composition of the entire cornerstone investor lineup is rare in the Hong Kong stock market's initial public offerings in recent years: it includes international top long-term funds and sovereign funds focused on ultra-long cycle value growth, as well as industry 'top-spec' strategic investors, and also includes Chinese capital top long-term institutions, fully demonstrating Momenta's scarce status in the HK stock market, having become the 'common choice of global long-term investors'.
Just the day before, Momenta announced that the scale of its mass production business installations has broken through 1 million units.
At the listing ceremony, Momenta CEO Cao Xudong stated: 'Ten years ago, we founded Momenta, just to pursue a simple yet firm mission: Better AI, Better Life. Better AI stems from our curiosity. Obsession and curiosity about artificial intelligence make our lives 'vibrant'. Better Life carries our sense of mission. Believing the value of technology lies in making people's lives safer, freer, and better. So, we set three ten-year visions: ten years to save a million lives, ten years to liberate 100% of time, ten years to double logistics and travel efficiency. Today, we have brought a safer and more reassuring driving experience to over 1 million users.'
When talking about the company's future development direction, Cao Xudong started from the company's past technical accumulation, extending to the next stage of intelligent scenarios, 'In the past ten years, we let AI learn to drive, bringing dedicated drivers to every family; in the next ten years, we will bring service scenarios of robots such as dedicated nannies, doctors, teachers, etc. to every family, creating the 'GPT moment' of physical AI. Hope to write the Oriental Silicon Valley legend together with all Chinese AI companies, embrace the whole world, and also let the whole world embrace Chinese technology.'
Common Choice of Global Long-term Investors: Anchored Subscription by Dozens of Top Long-term Funds, Consistent OptimismCarefully reviewing Momenta's anchor subscription institutions and cornerstone investor list, one can find it has extremely high gold content; every single one is a leader in global finance, industry, and other sub-fields.
For example, sovereign funds focusing on long-cycle value investment gathered Singapore Government Investment Corporation, Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, Temasek, Oman Investment Authority, etc. Asset management institutions gathered 'All-Star' lineups including Fidelity International, BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, UBS, CIC, etc., fully demonstrating consistent recognition of Momenta's financial performance and long-term value in the physical AI field.
In the cornerstone list, Singapore Government Investment Corporation and Fidelity International strongly led the investment, both allocated 100 million USD; BlackRock Group invested 25 million USD, Oaktree Capital invested 20 million USD, Franklin Templeton Funds Group invested 10 million USD. Industry 'top-spec' strategic investors include leaders of international and Chinese car companies - Mercedes-Benz and BYD, investing 25 million USD and 15 million USD respectively; industry chain partner GigaDevice invested 6 million USD. Top Chinese capital long-term private equity, public funds, and insurance capital include China's top private equity funds Gao Yi and Boyu, China's top public funds Huaxia and GF, as well as the leader in long-term insurance capital Pacific Insurance, each investing 10 million USD.
The past investment history of the two leading investors can be described as impressive. Among them, the globally renowned sovereign fund Singapore Government Investment Corporation has invested in a series of globally known tech companies in recent years, including large model leader company Anthropic, TSMC, etc., previously investing in well-known industry leaders such as Alibaba, Meituan, Kuaishou, etc. And the global top asset management institution Fidelity International has made long-term investments in Tencent, Alibaba, BYD, CATL, etc., and in recent years has also invested in many AI field leaders such as Zhongji Xuchuang, Cambricon, etc. through its funds via its funds. Choosing to lead the investment in Momenta may mean they have regarded Momenta as one of the core targets in the AI track.
It is worth noting that Mercedes-Benz and BYD also appeared on Momenta's cornerstone list, and joined hands to support. As a benchmark of the global automotive industry and a leader in new energy vehicle companies, Mercedes-Benz and BYD are not only old shareholders of Momenta but also partners. This time, continuing to increase investment as cornerstone and accompanying all the way, fully demonstrating recognition of Momenta's physical AI technology leading advantage and commercial prospects, and further deepening the moat of their strategic cooperation.
Before the IPO, Momenta has already obtained multiple rounds of financing. The shareholder lineup gathered the world's most core industry and technology strategic investors, as well as global top financial investors. The ultra-luxurious and diversified shareholder lineup not only provided strategic and capital support for Momenta, but also helped Momenta achieve high-speed growth from aspects such as business synergy, user growth, and global layout.
Mass Production Breaks 1 Million Units: One Model 'Conquers the World', Accelerating Towards the 'General Physical AI' EraMomenta was founded in 2016 and is a globally leading physical AI company, committed to creating a better life through breakthrough AI technology. Momenta takes the world model as the foundation, based on 'data flywheel' technology insights, mass production business (Mass Production) and scalable unmanned business (Scalable Robo) 'two legs' running in parallel, bringing physical AI into real life.
In April this year, Momenta R7 World Model mass production debut, opening the 'chapter of physical AI'. Momenta is committed to building the physical AI foundation platform, supporting mass production of passenger cars, unmanned logistics vehicles (Robovan), autonomous driving trucks (Robotruck), and autonomous driving taxis (Robotaxi), and will also expand to fields such as robots. As the foundation model of physical AI, R7 World Model is expected to become the key breakthrough point to stimulate physical AI 'GPT moment', and lead the industry to accelerate towards the 'General Physical AI' era.
Relying on the first-mover advantage in physical AI, world models, and commercialization, Momenta's 'flywheel effect' has fully manifested: the first 100,000 units of mass production in 2022 took 24 months, while now the fastest can complete 100,000 unit delivery in less than 40 days. Currently, the scale of mass production vehicles equipped with Momenta system has broken through 1 million units, successfully delivered over 100 mass production models, cumulative fixed models exceed 210 models. Momenta's customers have covered all domestic mainstream passenger car enterprises, and among the top 10 global car companies, 9 have already carried out cooperation with it.
The prospectus shows that Momenta achieved leapfrog growth in revenue scale in the past three years: from 2023 to 2025, Momenta's operating revenue grew from 743 million yuan to 2.413 billion yuan, tripled in three years, with a compound annual growth rate of over 80%. Among them, the growth of licensing revenue was particularly bright, tripling 42 times in three years. At the same time, Momenta's gross margin continued to rise, from 17.5% in 2023 to 71.6% in 2025, quadrupling in three years. As of the end of 2025, the company's cash reserves exceeded 10 billion yuan, providing strong support for accelerating Robo market and global development.
In terms of global layout, Momenta's mass production solutions have been implemented in 10 countries and regions including Asia, Europe, Oceania, Latin America, and North Africa. Momenta Robotaxi has established cooperation with global travel platforms such as Uber, Grab, Lumo, Xiangdao Travel, etc., and car companies such as Mercedes-Benz. It has been implemented in Asia, Europe, and the Middle East regions, and plans to implement in many new cities and regions globally this year.
This IPO going to Hong Kong will not only inject strong momentum into Momenta's technology evolution and business expansion, but also set a new benchmark for the capitalization and scaling development of the physical AI industry, becoming an important milestone for global physical AI to shift from theoretical research to commercial implementation. At the same time, the IPO is also expected to further accelerate Momenta's global process, and promote the progress of the global physical AI industry with a 'China solution' in the wave of AI technology going overseas.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Mazda CX-60 同 Volvo XC60 PHEV 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近嘅，今日我哋就係多個方面做個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Mazda CX-60 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 200,510 - 252,873，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus（RM 252,873）、2025 2.5L 2WD High（RM 200,510） 等。
Volvo XC60 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 362,888 - 362,888，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 2.0T 89km Ultra（RM 362,888）、Volvo XC60 PHEV 邊啲安全配備有？（RM 296,610） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Mazda CX-60 嘅起價確實比 Volvo XC60 PHEV 平咗 RM 162,378。如果你預算有限，Mazda 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Mazda CX-60 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense Pro。
Volvo XC60 PHEV 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全了。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心這一點。
Mazda CX-60 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Volvo XC60 PHEV 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。
Mazda CX-60 同 Volvo XC60 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，Mazda CX-60 同 Volvo XC60 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家在揀車嘅時候都會拿 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 同 斯巴魯 Crosstrek 來做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省做功課嘅時間。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000） 等。
斯巴魯 Crosstrek 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 145,000 - 160,000，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2.0L e-Boxer（RM 150,000） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，斯巴魯 Crosstrek 嘅起步價比 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 平咗 RM 14,750。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千塊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 配備 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
斯巴魯 Crosstrek 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 斯巴魯 Crosstrek 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力，中段加速更有信心，尤其係跑高速公路超車嗰陣。不過 斯巴魯 Crosstrek 嘅油耗可能更抵，日常市區通勤分別唔會太大。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
斯巴魯 Crosstrek 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 EyeSight。
安全配備方面，兩款車都攞到唔錯嘅評級。不過 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 嘅 Basic 同 斯巴魯 Crosstrek 嘅 EyeSight 喺功能上有啲分別，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較一下兩者嘅功能列表。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
斯巴魯 Crosstrek 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 同 斯巴魯 Crosstrek 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總嘅嚟講，奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 同 斯巴魯 Crosstrek 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Chery Tiggo 9 同 BMW X1 來做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Chery Tiggo 9 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 166,800 - 179,800，總共有 1 個版本，包括 2026 2.0T Standard（RM 179,750）等。
BMW X1 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 252,800 - 252,800，總共有 2 個版本，包括 sDrive18i（RM 220,000）、sDrive20i（RM 250,000）等。
從價錢嚟睇，Chery Tiggo 9 嘅起價確實比 BMW X1 平咗 RM 86,000。如果你預算有限，Chery 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Chery Tiggo 9 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
BMW X1 搭載 2.0L Turbo，馬力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
動力方面，BMW X1 嘅 2.0L Turbo 比 Chery Tiggo 9 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 多咗 50 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區行，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Chery Tiggo 9 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
BMW X1 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Chery Tiggo 9 嘅 Basic 同 BMW X1 嘅 Premium ADAS 喺功能上有些分別，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
Chery Tiggo 9 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
BMW X1 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Chery Tiggo 9 同 BMW X1 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最尾都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，Chery Tiggo 9 同 BMW X1 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行之嘅報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多人買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 BMW X7 同 Audi Q5 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價格同定位上都幾接近，今日就由多個角度做一個詳細比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
BMW X7 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 635,800 - 694,800，合共 3 個型號，包括 1.5L 標準 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L 行政版 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L 頂級 2WD（RM 122,300）等等。
Audi Q5 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 354,174 - 423,174，合共 2 個型號，包括 40 TDI（RM 320,000）、45 TFSI（RM 350,000）等等。
由價錢睇落，Audi Q5 嘅起步價比 BMW X7 平咗 RM 281,626。講真，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
BMW X7 配備 3.0L 渦輪，馬力 350 匹。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
Audi Q5 配備 2.0L 渦輪，馬力 220 匹。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
動力方面，BMW X7 嘅 3.0L 渦輪比 Audi Q5 嘅 2.0L 渦輪多咗 130 匹馬力，中段加速更有信心，尤其係行高速超車嘅時候。不過 Audi Q5 嘅油耗可能更抵，日常市區通勤差別唔會太大。
BMW X7 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Audi Q5 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Pre Sense + ACC。
安全配備方面，兩部車都攞到唔錯嘅評級。不過 BMW X7 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Audi Q5 嘅 Pre Sense + ACC 功能上有些差異，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
BMW X7 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
Audi Q5 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
兩部車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
BMW X7 保養 5 年/無限里數，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或者 6 個月。
Audi Q5 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或者 6 個月。
總括嚟講，BMW X7 同 Audi Q5 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊部，關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好做功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅轎車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿本田思域 Type R 同保時捷 718 做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
本田思域 Type R 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 399,900 - 399,900，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2023 2.0T Standard（RM 399,900）、OTR NI（RM 399,900）、富豪 ES90（RM 339,888）等。
保時捷 718 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 545,000 - 1,700,000，一共有 6 個版本，包括 2025 AMG G 63（RM 1,948,888）、2025 Cayman 2.0T（RM 585,000）、2025 Boxster 2.0T（RM 545,000）等。
從價錢嚟睇，本田思域 Type R 嘅起步價確實比保時捷 718 平咗 RM 145,100。如果你預算有限，本田嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要記住，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
本田思域 Type R 車身長 4450 mm，後備箱 470 L。
保時捷 718 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
空間方面，本田思域 Type R 嘅車身比保時捷 718 長咗 50 mm，車內乘坐空間會稍微寬裕啲，尤其係後座腿部空間。如果你經常載家人或者需要放嬰兒車，大啲嘅車身確實更實用。
本田思域 Type R 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
保時捷 718 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
本田思域 Type R 同保時捷 718 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總嘅嚟講，本田思域 Type R 同保時捷 718 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊部車，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
當馬來西亞嘅轎車市場入面，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會揀 Volkswagen Golf R 同 BMW 3 Series 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Volkswagen Golf R 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 338,812 - 338,812，一共 有 2 個版本，包括 2026 2.0T Standard（RM 338,812）、DCT（RM 294,800） 等。
BMW 3 Series 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 267,800 - 392,800，一共 有 2 個版本，包括 320i Sport（RM 248,000）、330i M Sport（RM 298,000） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，BMW 3 Series 嘅起步價比 Volkswagen Golf R 平咗 RM 71,012。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Volkswagen Golf R 配備 2.0L Turbo，馬力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
BMW 3 Series 配備 2.0L Turbo，馬力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
呢兩款車用緊同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感覺基本上冇咩分別。油耗方面都幾接近，唔使太糾結呢一點。
Volkswagen Golf R 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
BMW 3 Series 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
呢兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車廂空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全够用。
Volkswagen Golf R 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
BMW 3 Series 保修 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總嘅嚟講，Volkswagen Golf R 同 BMW 3 Series 都係馬來西亞市場幾好嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅皮卡市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Mitsubishi Triton 同 Isuzu D-MAX 嚟做比較。這兩部車喺價位同定位上都蠻接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細嘅比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Mitsubishi Triton 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 101,930 - 169,930，合共 7 個版本，包括 2026 Double Cab 2.4T AT Athlete Championship（RM 169,930）、2026 Double Cab 2.4T AT Premium Championship（RM 155,930）、2025 Double Cab 2.4T AT Athlete（RM 159,930） 等。
Isuzu D-MAX 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 95,000 - 155,000，合共 9 個版本，包括 2026 3.0T AT 4WD X-Terrain 5 Seats（RM 162,888）、2026 3.0T AT 4WD Premium 5 Seats（RM 145,088）、2026 2.2T AT 4WD Premium 5 Seats（RM 141,771） 等。
從價錢睇，Isuzu D-MAX 嘅起步價比 Mitsubishi Triton 平咗 RM 6,930。實話講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Mitsubishi Triton 搭載 2.5L Diesel，馬力 187 hp。官方油耗 8.5 L/100km。
Isuzu D-MAX 搭載 2.5L Diesel，馬力 187 hp。官方油耗 8.5 L/100km。
兩部車用緊同一套動力系統，日常開落嚟嘅感受基本冇分別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太諗太多這一點。
Mitsubishi Triton 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
Isuzu D-MAX 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS。
安全配備方面，兩部車都拿到幾唔錯嘅評級。不過 Mitsubishi Triton 嘅 Basic 同 Isuzu D-MAX 嘅 ADAS 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
Mitsubishi Triton 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Isuzu D-MAX 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩部車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。
Mitsubishi Triton 同 Isuzu D-MAX 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩部都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，Mitsubishi Triton 同 Isuzu D-MAX 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
在马来西亚的MPV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Honda Odyssey 和 Kia Carnival 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Honda Odyssey 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 278,000 - 278,000，一共有 1 个版本，包括 2.0L eHEV（RM 278,000） 等。
Kia Carnival 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 189,849 - 249,849，一共有 6 个版本，包括 2025 2.2T Standard 7 Seats（RM 249,849）、2025 2.2T Standard 8 Seats（RM 239,849）、2025 2.2T Standard 11 Seats（RM 189,849） 等。
从价钱来看，Kia Carnival 的起步价比 Honda Odyssey 便宜了 RM 88,151。老实讲，在这个价位段，几千块的差距其实不算大，关键还是看整体的性价比和长期使用成本。
Honda Odyssey 的安全评级是 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Brand ADAS。
Kia Carnival 的安全评级是 TBD，主动安全系统包括 Basic。
安全配备方面，两款车都拿到了不错的评级。不过 Honda Odyssey 的 Brand ADAS 和 Kia Carnival 的 Basic 在功能上有些差异，如果你比较看重主动安全的话，可以仔细对比一下两者的功能列表。
Honda Odyssey 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Kia Carnival 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
两款车的驱动方式一样，都是 FWD，日常驾驶感受不会有太大区别。
Honda Odyssey 和 Kia Carnival 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择，适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价，可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款；如果你更在意性价比和配备，那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾，亲身体验才是最重要的。
总的来说，Honda Odyssey 和 Kia Carnival 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
在马来西亚的MPV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Honda Odyssey 和 Toyota Vellfire 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Honda Odyssey 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 278,000 - 278,000，一共有 1 个版本，包括 2.0L eHEV（RM 278,000） 等。
Toyota Vellfire 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 448,000 - 549,900，一共有 3 个版本，包括 2026 HEV 2.5L Executive Lounge（RM 549,900）、2025 2.5L Standard（RM 448,000）、E-CVT（RM 548,000） 等。
从价钱来看，Honda Odyssey 的起步价确实比 Toyota Vellfire 便宜了 RM 170,000。如果你预算有限，Honda 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意，便宜的那几千块，可能在配备上会有取舍，具体要看你的需求。
Honda Odyssey 的安全评级是 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Brand ADAS。
Toyota Vellfire 的安全评级是 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Brand ADAS。
两款车的安全评级一样，在这个级别里面安全配备都算给得很齐全了。现在的新车安全性都不差，不用太担心这一点。
Honda Odyssey 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
Toyota Vellfire 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
两款车的尺寸几乎一样，车内空间差别不大。这个级别的车，日常使用完全够用。
Honda Odyssey 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Toyota Vellfire 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
两款车的驱动方式一样，都是 FWD，日常驾驶感受不会有太大区别。
总的来说，Honda Odyssey 和 Toyota Vellfire 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
在马来西亚的MPV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Honda Odyssey 和 Toyota Innova Zenix 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Honda Odyssey 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 278,000 - 278,000，一共有 1 个版本，包括 2.0L eHEV（RM 278,000） 等。
Toyota Innova Zenix 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 165,000 - 202,000，一共有 2 个版本，包括 2023 HEV 2.0L Standard（RM 202,000）、2023 2.0L V（RM 165,000） 等。
从价钱来看，Toyota Innova Zenix 的起步价比 Honda Odyssey 便宜了 RM 113,000。老实讲，在这个价位段，几千块的差距其实不算大，关键还是看整体的性价比和长期使用成本。
Honda Odyssey 搭载 2.0L Turbo，马力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
Toyota Innova Zenix 搭载 Hybrid，马力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
动力方面，Honda Odyssey 的 2.0L Turbo 比 Toyota Innova Zenix 的 Hybrid 多了 50 匹马力，中段加速更有信心，尤其是跑高速公路超车的时候。不过 Toyota Innova Zenix 的油耗可能更友好，日常市区通勤差别不会太大。
Honda Odyssey 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Toyota Innova Zenix 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
两款车的驱动方式一样，都是 FWD，日常驾驶感受不会有太大区别。
Honda Odyssey 保修 5年/无限制里程，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
Toyota Innova Zenix 保修 5年/无限制里程，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
两款车的保修条件一样，这方面不用纠结。实际保养成本还要看品牌的服务网络和零件价格，建议去车友群问问真实车主的经验。
Honda Odyssey 和 Toyota Innova Zenix 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择，适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价，可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款；如果你更在意性价比和配备，那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾，亲身体验才是最重要的。
总的来说，Honda Odyssey 和 Toyota Innova Zenix 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
在马来西亚的MPV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Perodua Alza 和 Toyota Veloz 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Perodua Alza 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 62,500 - 75,500，一共有 3 个版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 62,500）、1.5L H（RM 68,000）、1.5L AV（RM 75,500） 等。
Toyota Veloz 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 95,000 - 95,000，一共有 1 个版本，包括 2025 1.5L Standard（RM 95,000） 等。
从价钱来看，Perodua Alza 的起步价确实比 Toyota Veloz 便宜了 RM 32,500。如果你预算有限，Perodua 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意，便宜的那几千块，可能在配备上会有取舍，具体要看你的需求。
Perodua Alza 的安全评级是 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 ASA 3.0。
Toyota Veloz 的安全评级是 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Brand ADAS。
两款车的安全评级一样，在这个级别里面安全配备都算给得很齐全了。现在的新车安全性都不差，不用太担心这一点。
Perodua Alza 车身长 4450 mm，后备箱 550 L。
Toyota Veloz 车身长 4450 mm，后备箱 550 L。
两款车的尺寸几乎一样，车内空间差别不大。这个级别的车，日常使用完全够用。
Perodua Alza 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Toyota Veloz 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
两款车的驱动方式一样，都是 FWD，日常驾驶感受不会有太大区别。
总的来说，Perodua Alza 和 Toyota Veloz 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
© 2024 Bitauto.com. All Rights Reserved.
Bitauto (www.yiche.com and www.bitauto.com) is one of the most visited automotive websites in China. We provide detailed info on Chinese car brands available in your area. Please note that the information provided on this website is based on publicly available data and is for reference only. It may not be fully updated or accurate at all times.
Help us improve our website
