HomeHats
Search History
Popular Searches
Dealer Login / Sign Up
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拎 Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-3 黎做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就會從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
Mazda CX-3 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 126,159 - 139,159，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2023 2.0L High（RM 139,159）、2023 2.0L Plus（RM 126,159） 等。
就價錢睇嚟，Proton X90 嘅起步價確實比 Mazda CX-3 平咗 RM 19,359。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，喺配備上面可能有取舍，具體就要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X90 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Mazda CX-3 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩款車用緊同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感受基本冇分別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太糾結呢一點。
Proton X90 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Mazda CX-3 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別裡面安全配備都算畀得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Proton X90 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-3 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問問真實車主嘅經驗。
Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-3 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就選配置更豐富嗰款。最後仲係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總體嚟講，Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-3 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵始終要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再嚟試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Hyundai Tucson when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300. There are 3 versions in total, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of Hyundai Tucson in Malaysia is RM 143,888 - 197,888. There are 5 versions in total, including 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige (RM 197,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige (RM 186,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime (RM 164,888), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 37,088 cheaper than Hyundai Tucson. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware that the few thousand cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
The safety rating of Proton X70 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP). Active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of Hyundai Tucson is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP). Active safety systems include SmartSense.
Both cars have the same safety rating. In this class, safety features are quite comprehensive. New cars nowadays generally have good safety, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X70 body length is 4400 mm, trunk capacity 400 L.
Hyundai Tucson body length is 4400 mm, trunk capacity 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, with little difference in interior space. For this class of cars, it is more than enough for daily use.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive mode.
Hyundai Tucson adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, so the driving feel will not be too different.
Overall, both Proton X70 and Hyundai Tucson are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major thing, spending time doing research will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Mazda CX-60 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of Mazda CX-60 in Malaysia is RM 200,510 - 252,873, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus (RM 252,873), 2025 2.5L 2WD High (RM 200,510), etc.
From the price perspective, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 93,710 cheaper than Mazda CX-60. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version is already sufficient to meet daily needs. But also note, the lower price might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
The safety rating of Proton X70 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of Mazda CX-60 is 5★ (Euro NCAP), with active safety systems including i-Activsense Pro.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, there are some differences in functionality between Proton X70's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Mazda CX-60's i-Activsense Pro. If you value active safety, you can compare their feature lists in detail.
Proton X70 warranty is 5 years / 150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-60 warranty is 5 years / 150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
The warranty conditions for both cars are the same, no need to worry about this aspect. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and parts prices. It is recommended to ask real owners in car owner groups for their experiences.
Proton X70 and Mazda CX-60 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both models; personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X70 and Mazda CX-60 are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends primarily on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big decision; spending time on research will definitely not be a mistake.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X70 定 Mazda CX-30 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
Mazda CX-30 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 122,409 - 146,409，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L High+ Premium（RM 146,409）、2025 2.0L High+（RM 138,409）、2025 2.0L High（RM 130,409） 等。
從價格嚟睇，Proton X70 嘅起步價確實比 Mazda CX-30 平咗 RM 15,609。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但要小心，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Mazda CX-30 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級數入面安全配備都算給得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mazda CX-30 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Proton X70 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-30 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保用條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要看品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問問真實車主嘅經驗。
總體嚟講，Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-30 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一台，關鍵始終係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X70 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 來做比較。这两款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個層面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
Toyota Corolla Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 133,800 - 148,800，共有 3 個版本，包括 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport（RM 148,800）、2026 HEV 1.8L Standard（RM 140,800）、2026 1.8L Standard（RM 133,800） 等。
由價錢睇嚟，Proton X70 嘅起步價確實比 Toyota Corolla Cross 平咗 RM 27,000。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有所取舍，具體就要睇你嘅需要。
Proton X70 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Toyota Corolla Cross 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩款車用嘅係同一套動力系統，日常開落嚟嘅感覺基本冇咩分別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太糾結這一點。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Toyota Corolla Cross 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 TSS (PCS, LDA, ACC, LTA)。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算係好齊全。而家新車嘅安全性都唔錯，唔使太擔心這一點。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，車廂 400 L。
Toyota Corolla Cross 車身長 4400 mm，車廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾近一樣，車廂空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X70 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用途、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，Proton X70 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 都係馬來西亞市場好好嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵始終係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
July 15, Changan Qiyuan held an event named "Global Design Showcase" in Shanghai, where its new model Q06 made its public debut. No price was announced, nor did pre-sales start; instead, it focused solely on one thing—design.
While most brands are busy piling up parameters at press conferences, Qiyuan chose to take an SUV that is not yet on the market to the design exhibition stage for a "solo walk," indicating that what Q06 wants to fight is a battle about aesthetics.And its confidence comes from a person's name: Klaus Zyciora.
Klaus Zyciora, former Head of Global Design at Volkswagen Group, core designer for Volkswagen and Porsche brands, a figure who once led the design of classic models such as Golf, Bugatti Veyron, and Volkswagen ID. Series. Since joining Changan Automobile as Vice President in October 2023, Q06 is his first mass-produced work targeting the mainstream market.
International Design Master "Enters China" Focused on Leading Changan Qiyuan
From a product level, Q06 indeed presented some design elements worth discussing.
With a length of 4837mm, a width of 1970mm, and a wheelbase of 2940mm, Q06 has already crossed the boundary of traditional compact SUVs in size, but the height of 1670mm is deliberately lowered, forming a visual proportion close to a Coupé SUV.
The 0.27Cd drag coefficient is excellent at the same level, indicating that the synergy between造型 design and engineering development is in place. In terms of proportion, the Klaus team is seriously working on a family SUV with a "sporty stance."
In addition, Qiyuan proposed a design language called "Flowing Light Aesthetics" for Q06.The beltline-less design kept the side of the car with a high level of purity, the full wheel arches shaped out the sense of power, and there were no extra decorative lines to interrupt the integrity of the body surfaces.
This "subtractive design" approach is common in luxury brands above 300,000 yuan, but in the price range of 150,000 yuan, it indeed belongs to a minority.
The interior part can better reflect the design team's intention.
All sharp edges are processed into rounded surfaces similar to pebbles, the 90.6% soft material coverage rate of the whole car, the 15.6-inch ceiling-mounted screen, and the独创 "Light Rail Piercing Building" electric sunshade are integrated on the same plane, indicating that in the two and a half years since Klaus joined, he has indeed made a fairly deep intervention in Changan's design specifications and supply chain coordination.
And in terms of underlying mechanical quality, Q06 synchronized the debut of Changan's self-developed Tianzhu Leading Ultra Intelligent Driving System, equipped with a front double wishbone aluminum suspension plus a rear five-link suspension and a dual-motor rear-wheel-drive layout that is rare in its class.
Changan Automobile Executive Vice President Yang Dayong described Q06 as a challenge to the "Impossible Triangle," meaning seeking a balance between造型, space, and handling.This is also the core value anchor Q06 is seeking for itself.
Iterating Looks into "Productivity"; Qiyuan Q06 Aims to Break the Situation
Returning to the brand level, the mission carried by Q06 has become much more complex.
From the data perspective, since Changan Qiyuan was launched in August 2023, less than three years have passed, with cumulative sales about to break 500,000 units. In the first half of 2026, deliveries exceeded 170,000 units, the AQ Series increased by 102.6% year-on-year, and the all-new Q05 has been the compact pure electric SUV sales champion for consecutive months.
However, on the other hand, its high-end product E07 sold only 802 units in the entire year of 2025, and cumulative deliveries in the first four months of 2026 were less than 200 units, almost negligible; the volume-selling Lumin Series contributed considerable figures, but prices were concentrated in the range of 30,000 to 60,000 yuan, which offers quite limited support for brand premium.
Against this background, Qiyuan chose to make Q06 focus on the design route, which is actually doing something risky but logically consistent:
In terms of price, they cannot compete with BYD; in terms of channel density, they cannot catch up with Geely Galaxy; in terms of brand volume, they cannot reach the top new forces for now. So establishing differentiated aesthetic cognition will become one of the few directions that can "move a thousand pounds with four taels".
Therefore, Klaus's joining, the design center synergy system spanning four places of China, Italy, Japan, and Germany, and the team scale covering over 900 designers in 39 countries, gave Qiyuan the capital to tell this story.
Whether these resources can be converted into end consumers' purchase decisions depends on the pricing and market performance after Q06 officially launches in September.
If it can gain a batch of loyal users in the red ocean market of compact SUVs based on design distinctiveness, then "good looks can help mainstream brands jump out of homogenized competition" will have a credible case.
Finally, there is one more point worth special attention. The all-new Q05 has already achieved a start of over 3,000 orders in three days since its launch in Thailand, while Q06 has been defined as a "global aesthetic flagship product" from the project start. Klaus's own international background and the configuration of the multicultural design team also point to this goal.
Looking at it from the background of going global, the distinctiveness and cultural penetration power of the design language might become a more effective competitive barrier than piling up parameters.After all, for overseas consumers, Chinese brands' 800V fast charging and LiDAR are not new, but a design language with distinctiveness is still a scarce item.
在马来西亚的汽车市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Land Rover Discovery Sport 和 Porsche Macan 来做比较。今天我们从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Land Rover Discovery Sport 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 499,800 - 499,800，一共有 1 个版本，包括 Standard（RM 499,800） 等。
Porsche Macan 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 469,000 - 469,000，一共有 4 个版本，包括 2025 55 quattro S line（RM 467,285）、2025 50 quattro Advanced（RM 361,135）、PMT 1874, Lorong IKS BukitTengah 14000 Bukit Mertajam（RM 296,610） 等。
从价钱来看，Porsche Macan 的起步价比 Land Rover Discovery Sport 便宜了 RM 30,800。老实讲，在这个价位段，几千块的差距其实不算大，关键还是看整体的性价比和长期使用成本。
Land Rover Discovery Sport 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
Porsche Macan 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
两款车的尺寸几乎一样，车内空间差别不大。这个级别的车，日常使用完全够用。
Land Rover Discovery Sport 采用 4WD 驱动方式。
Porsche Macan 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Land Rover Discovery Sport 的 4WD 和 Porsche Macan 的 FWD 在操控上会有不同感受，建议试驾对比。
Land Rover Discovery Sport 和 Porsche Macan 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择，适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价，可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款；如果你更在意性价比和配备，那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾，亲身体验才是最重要的。
总的来说，Land Rover Discovery Sport 和 Porsche Macan 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
在马来西亚的SUV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Ford Everest 和 Audi Q7 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Ford Everest 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 266,338 - 430,838，一共有 6 个版本，包括 2026 3.0T 4WD Platinum（RM 430,838）、2026 2.0T 4WD Platinum（RM 348,838）、2026 2.0T 4WD Sport（RM 316,838） 等。
Audi Q7 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 462,222 - 462,222，一共有 1 个版本，包括 Standard（RM 462,222） 等。
从价钱来看，Ford Everest 的起步价确实比 Audi Q7 便宜了 RM 195,884。如果你预算有限，Ford 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意，便宜的那几千块，可能在配备上会有取舍，具体要看你的需求。
Ford Everest 的安全评级是 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Co-Pilot360。
Audi Q7 的安全评级是 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Premium ADAS。
安全配备方面，两款车都拿到了不错的评级。不过 Ford Everest 的 Co-Pilot360 和 Audi Q7 的 Premium ADAS 在功能上有些差异，如果你比较看重主动安全的话，可以仔细对比一下两者的功能列表。
Ford Everest 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Audi Q7 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
两款车的驱动方式一样，都是 FWD，日常驾驶感受不会有太大区别。
Ford Everest 和 Audi Q7 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择，适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价，可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款；如果你更在意性价比和配备，那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾，亲身体验才是最重要的。
总的来说，Ford Everest 和 Audi Q7 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
在马来西亚的SUV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Mazda CX-8 和 MG MG HS 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Mazda CX-8 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 165,360 - 201,360，一共有 5 个版本，包括 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol（RM 201,360）、2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel（RM 193,123）、2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol（RM 186,360） 等。
MG MG HS 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 130,450 - 146,450，一共有 2 个版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 105,000）、1.5L Executive（RM 115,000） 等。
从价钱来看，MG MG HS 的起步价比 Mazda CX-8 便宜了 RM 34,910。老实讲，在这个价位段，几千块的差距其实不算大，关键还是看整体的性价比和长期使用成本。
Mazda CX-8 的安全评级是 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Brand ADAS。
MG MG HS 的安全评级是 TBD，主动安全系统包括 Basic。
安全配备方面，两款车都拿到了不错的评级。不过 Mazda CX-8 的 Brand ADAS 和 MG MG HS 的 Basic 在功能上有些差异，如果你比较看重主动安全的话，可以仔细对比一下两者的功能列表。
Mazda CX-8 车身长 4500 mm，后备箱 450 L。
MG MG HS 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
空间方面，Mazda CX-8 的车身比 MG MG HS 长了 100 mm，车内乘坐空间会稍微宽裕一些，尤其是后座腿部空间。如果你经常载家人或者需要放婴儿车，大一点的车身确实更实用。
Mazda CX-8 保修 5年/150,000km，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
MG MG HS 保修 7年/150,000km，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
Mazda CX-8 和 MG MG HS 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择，适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价，可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款；如果你更在意性价比和配备，那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾，亲身体验才是最重要的。
总的来说，Mazda CX-8 和 MG MG HS 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
在马来西亚的SUV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Mazda CX-3 和 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Mazda CX-3 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 126,159 - 139,159，一共有 2 个版本，包括 2023 2.0L High（RM 139,159）、2023 2.0L Plus（RM 126,159） 等。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 129,750 - 129,750，一共有 2 个版本，包括 2025 1.5T 90km CSH（RM 129,750）、What charging methods does the Tiggo 7 PHEV support? Can it be charged using a home power socket?（RM 117,478） 等。
从价钱来看，Mazda CX-3 的起步价确实比 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 便宜了 RM 3,591。如果你预算有限，Mazda 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意，便宜的那几千块，可能在配备上会有取舍，具体要看你的需求。
Mazda CX-3 搭载 1.5L Turbo，马力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 搭载 Hybrid，马力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
动力方面，Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 的 Hybrid 比 Mazda CX-3 的 1.5L Turbo 多了 30 匹马力。不过日常在市区开，两款车的动力都够用，不会觉得不够力。
Mazda CX-3 的安全评级是 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 i-Activsense。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 的安全评级是 TBD，主动安全系统包括 Basic。
安全配备方面，两款车都拿到了不错的评级。不过 Mazda CX-3 的 i-Activsense 和 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 的 Basic 在功能上有些差异，如果你比较看重主动安全的话，可以仔细对比一下两者的功能列表。
Mazda CX-3 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
两款车的驱动方式一样，都是 FWD，日常驾驶感受不会有太大区别。
Mazda CX-3 和 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择，适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价，可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款；如果你更在意性价比和配备，那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾，亲身体验才是最重要的。
总的来说，Mazda CX-3 和 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
© 2024 Bitauto.com. All Rights Reserved.
Bitauto (www.yiche.com and www.bitauto.com) is one of the most visited automotive websites in China. We provide detailed info on Chinese car brands available in your area. Please note that the information provided on this website is based on publicly available data and is for reference only. It may not be fully updated or accurate at all times.
Help us improve our website
