喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X70 同 Subaru Forester 嚟作比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。

價錢同版本

Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，合共 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。

Subaru Forester 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 174,000 - 197,000，合共 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition（RM 189,538）、2024 2.0L S EyeSight（RM 177,538）、2024 2.0L L EyeSight（RM 167,538） 等。

睇返價錢，Proton X70 嘅起價確實比 Subaru Forester 平咗 RM 67,200。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。不過亦要留意，平嗰啲幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有所取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。

安全配備

Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。

Subaru Forester 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 EyeSight。

安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到不錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Subaru Forester 嘅 EyeSight 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者的功能列表。

空間同舒適度

Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。

Subaru Forester 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。

兩款車嘅尺寸差唔多，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。

配備同科技

Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。

Subaru Forester 採用 FWD 驅動方式。

兩款車的驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。

總結

總體嚟講，Proton X70 同 Subaru Forester 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇返你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

The first half of 2026 is over; it is time to review the development of the new energy vehicle market in the first half of the year.

Overall, China's market position dominated by new energy vehicles has become relatively stable. In June, the retail penetration rate of new energy vehicles remained at a historic high of 62.8%.

On July 8, the CPCA released market data for passenger cars in June. The word most used by CPCA Secretary General Cui Dongshu was differentiation — “collapse of domestic fuel car sales, dominant strength of new energy vehicles, and strong growth in exports”. More specifically, passenger car trends were difficult, commercial vehicles were hot, and the performance of plug-in hybrids and extended-range vehicles was far weaker than pure electric models.

From the data perspective, from January to June 2026, new energy passenger car retail sales were 4.704 million units, a year-on-year decrease of 14.0%; wholesale sales were 6.788 million units, a year-on-year increase of 5.1%. The coexistence of negative growth in retail and positive growth in wholesale, reveals the core characteristic of the current market, which is domestic consumption contraction and explosive growth in overseas exports.

With the retreat of subsidies and the impact of high oil prices, new energy vehicles stabilized their basic market share through technology iteration and explosive export growth. Fuel vehicles, under the dual suppression of new energy vehicles and high oil prices, saw their market share shrink significantly.

01

Domestic Brands Lead, New Forces Gain Share, Joint Ventures Face 'Fuel vs. Electric' Contrasting Fortunes

In terms of enterprises, without exception, BYD still leads the pack with a monthly wholesale sales volume of 397,000 units. Domestic brands such as Geely, Chery, and Leapmotor made strong breakthroughs, while joint venture brands showed a dramatic differentiation of 'dismal fuel sales vs. rapid electric growth' — mainstream joint venture new energy retail sales grew by 45% year-on-year, but their fuel car base shrank by 39% concurrently.

Manufacturers with New Energy Passenger Car Wholesale Sales Exceeding 10,000 Units in June

 Source: CPCA

Enterprise Brands with Domestic New Energy Passenger Car Retail Sales Exceeding 20,000 Units in June

Source: CPCA

In terms of new forces, the retail share of new forces rose to 26.0% in June, an increase of 6.5 percentage points year-on-year, and it is particularly worth noting that the proportion of pure electric vehicle sales for new forces reached as high as 82.2%, and the sales proportion of 100,000-150,000 yuan level models increased significantly, indicating that they are penetrating the mass market.

In terms of second-generation creators, new energy brands incubated by traditional large groups such as Zeekr, Deepal, Arcfox, and Lantu performed brightly. The share of independent new energy brands from traditional domestic automakers reached 18.5%, an increase of 5.2 percentage points year-on-year.

In terms of joint venture brands, the penetration rate of mainstream joint venture new energy only rose to 11.9%, but joint venture new energy vehicle sales grew by 45% year-on-year, while fuel vehicle sales plummeted by 39%, forming a sharp contrast. The new energy penetration rate of luxury cars reached 39.6%, but overall retail still declined by 30%, significantly impacted by high oil prices and downgrading consumption.

02

New Energy Vehicle Penetration Rate 62.8%, Extended-Range Wholesale Plunged 25.2% Year-on-Year

From the wholesale perspective, pure electric and plug-in hybrid still maintain positive growth, while extended-range vehicles show a decline in both wholesale and retail; from the retail perspective, all three routes declined, with pure electric having the smallest decline at -6.6%; plug-in hybrid had the largest decline at -27.6%. The growth rate difference between retail and wholesale clearly reflects the degree of reliance on exports to drive each route.

Currently, the characteristic of the pure electric market is 'the more expensive, the easier to sell; the cheaper, the harder to sell'. Pure electric wholesale increased by 10.7% month-on-month in June, significantly higher than the retail month-on-month growth rate. Class B electric vehicles became the only sub-segment with high-speed growth, with wholesale volume of 295,000 units in June, a 37% year-on-year increase, accounting for 30% of pure electric share, an increase of 2 percentage points compared to the same period last year, with high-end models like Model Y and BYD Song continuing to sell well. While the entry-level market saw a cliff-like decline: Class A00 wholesale in June was only 77,000 units, a 50% year-on-year plunge, dropping from nearly 20% last year to 8% of pure electric share; Class A electric vehicles wholesale was 236,000 units, a decrease of 2.7 percentage points year-on-year. Although the combined share of Class A00 and A0 accounts for 40% of pure electric share, it mainly relies on exports for digestion, and the domestic market performance is weak.

Plug-in hybrid models are the sub-segment where domestic and foreign demand divergence is most severe among the three routes. Wholesale volume for the first half of the year was 1.997 million units, a year-on-year increase of 4.6%; retail volume was 1.155 million units, a year-on-year drop of 27.6%. The difference in growth rates between retail and wholesale was 32.2 percentage points,

Extended-range models are the only sub-segment among the three routes to show a decline in both wholesale and retail. Wholesale volume for the first half of the year was 504,000 units, a year-on-year decrease of 13.1%; retail volume was 439,000 units, a year-on-year decrease of 19.4%, and the decline showed an expanding trend — wholesale volume for June alone was 94,000 units, a year-on-year decrease of 25.2%, and a month-on-month decrease of 0.2%.

The share of extended-range vehicles in the new energy wholesale structure has been compressed from about 10% in 2025 to 6.4% (June alone).

The decline in plug-in hybrid and extended-range models is mainly affected by falling battery prices, flash charging technology, and the improvement of charging facilities.

Regarding the poor performance in the June retail sector, Cui Dongshu's explanation is that the Dragon Boat Festival mismatch created a high base effect, the '618' promotion failed to meet expectations, the World Cup kick-off diverted the time and budget of car buyers, the college entrance exam and farming busy season suppressed store traffic, compounded by hot and rainy weather, plus the rare frequency squeeze of high base factors.

In addition, the new national standards for new energy vehicle safety landed in July (mandatory requirements for battery 'thermal runaway without fire'), causing some consumers to possibly be in a state of delayed and waiting consumption.

However, the CPCA expressed concern about the weak growth of economic electric vehicles. They believe that from a long-term popularization trend perspective, economic electric vehicle growth has the most potential; only the popularization of entry-level electric vehicles can truly drive sustainable incremental growth in the car market. However, the reality is that the county and township markets, entry-level models declined too much, the marginal impact of subsidy retreat on low-price models far exceeds that of high-end models. If the situation of 'high-end volume, entry-level collapse' continues, it will seriously restrict the popularization process of new energy. Economic electric vehicle standards are urgently needed to guide the industry to fill the entry market blank.

03

Exports Become Core Engine, Overseas Share Jumps

New energy vehicle exports were the biggest highlight of the first half of the year.

First, explosive growth in exports. In June, new energy passenger car exports reached 499,000 units, a year-on-year increase of 152.7%, a month-on-month increase of 17.6%, accounting for 56.9% of total passenger car exports. Cumulative exports for the first half of the year were 2.231 million units, a year-on-year increase of 124.3%, among which fuel car exports also grew by 33% concurrently. In terms of going global, the situation of 'both fuel and electric increase' was formed.

Secondly, the export structure is also being optimized. Pure electric vehicles account for 58.7% of new energy exports, narrow plug-in hybrids account for 37.7%, up 4.3 percentage points from last year; extended-range accounts for 3.6%. In June, BYD (exports 171,000 units), Chery (74,000 units), and Geely (62,000 units) ranked in the top three for exports. The CKD (complete knock-down assembly) export model was promoted rapidly, with Great Wall and SAIC-GM-Wuling, etc., having CKD shares exceeding 30%, and international system capabilities significantly enhanced.

Additionally, the overseas market share is still jumping up. From January to May 2026, China's new energy passenger cars accounted for 62% of the world share, of which pure electric accounted for 58%, plug-in hybrid accounted for 71%. The sales share of autonomous new energy overseas markets jumped significantly from 15.8% in 2025 to 23.4%, with rapid growth in markets such as Brazil, Australia, Thailand, and the UK. Although the US market was significantly affected by subsidy cancellation fluctuations, European new energy grew by 29% year-on-year, and domestic brands are accelerating to fill the blank.

In terms of market forecasting, the CPCA estimates the year-on-year growth rate of domestic narrow passenger car retail sales in 2026 to be about -14%, but Cui Dongshu believes that from the third quarter onwards, the decline will gradually narrow, and market growth expectations may rise by a few percentage points.

在马来西亚的汽车市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Volkswagen Tiguan 和 Volvo XC60 PHEV 来做比较。今天我们从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。

价钱和版本

Volkswagen Tiguan 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 206,540 - 260,024，一共有 2 个版本，包括 2025 Allspace 2.0T R-Line（RM 260,024）、2025 Allspace 1.4T Elegance（RM 206,540） 等。

Volvo XC60 PHEV 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 362,888 - 362,888，一共有 2 个版本，包括 2025 2.0T 89km Ultra（RM 362,888）、What safety features does the Volvo XC60 PHEV have?（RM 296,610） 等。

从价钱来看，Volkswagen Tiguan 的起步价确实比 Volvo XC60 PHEV 便宜了 RM 156,348。如果你预算有限，Volkswagen 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意，便宜的那几千块，可能在配备上会有取舍，具体要看你的需求。

安全配备

Volkswagen Tiguan 的安全评级是 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 IQ.Drive。

Volvo XC60 PHEV 的安全评级是 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Premium ADAS。

两款车的安全评级一样，在这个级别里面安全配备都算给得很齐全了。现在的新车安全性都不差，不用太担心这一点。

空间和舒适度

Volkswagen Tiguan 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。

Volvo XC60 PHEV 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。

两款车的尺寸几乎一样，车内空间差别不大。这个级别的车，日常使用完全够用。

适合什么样的人

Volkswagen Tiguan 和 Volvo XC60 PHEV 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择，适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价，可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款；如果你更在意性价比和配备，那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾，亲身体验才是最重要的。

总结

总的来说，Volkswagen Tiguan 和 Volvo XC60 PHEV 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。

在马来西亚的MPV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Honda Odyssey 和 Nissan Serena 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。

价钱和版本

Honda Odyssey 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 278,000 - 278,000，一共有 1 个版本，包括 2.0L eHEV（RM 278,000） 等。

Nissan Serena 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 149,888 - 179,800，一共有 7 个版本，包括 2026 HEV 1.5L Shiro Premium Highway Star（RM 179,800）、2026 HEV 1.5L Premium Highway Star（RM 174,800）、2026 HEV 1.5L Highway Star（RM 169,800） 等。

从价钱来看，Nissan Serena 的起步价比 Honda Odyssey 便宜了 RM 128,112。老实讲，在这个价位段，几千块的差距其实不算大，关键还是看整体的性价比和长期使用成本。

动力和油耗

Honda Odyssey 搭载 2.0L Turbo，马力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。

Nissan Serena 搭载 1.5L Turbo，马力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。

动力方面，Honda Odyssey 的 2.0L Turbo 比 Nissan Serena 的 1.5L Turbo 多了 80 匹马力，中段加速更有信心，尤其是跑高速公路超车的时候。不过 Nissan Serena 的油耗可能更友好，日常市区通勤差别不会太大。

空间和舒适度

Honda Odyssey 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。

Nissan Serena 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。

两款车的尺寸几乎一样，车内空间差别不大。这个级别的车，日常使用完全够用。

配置和科技

Honda Odyssey 采用 FWD 驱动方式。

Nissan Serena 采用 FWD 驱动方式。

两款车的驱动方式一样，都是 FWD，日常驾驶感受不会有太大区别。

适合什么样的人

Honda Odyssey 和 Nissan Serena 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择，适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价，可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款；如果你更在意性价比和配备，那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾，亲身体验才是最重要的。

总结

总的来说，Honda Odyssey 和 Nissan Serena 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。

在马来西亚的SUV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Mazda CX-5 和 Chery Tiggo Cross 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。

价钱和版本

Mazda CX-5 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 135,469 - 166,760，一共有 3 个版本，包括 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary（RM 316,154）、2025 2.0L AT（RM 296,154）、2025 2.0L MT（RM 294,154） 等。

Chery Tiggo Cross 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 88,750 - 99,750，一共有 2 个版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH（RM 99,750）、2025 1.5T Standard（RM 88,750） 等。

从价钱来看，Chery Tiggo Cross 的起步价比 Mazda CX-5 便宜了 RM 46,719。老实讲，在这个价位段，几千块的差距其实不算大，关键还是看整体的性价比和长期使用成本。

安全配备

Mazda CX-5 的安全评级是 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 。

Chery Tiggo Cross 的安全评级是 TBD，主动安全系统包括 Basic。

配置和科技

Mazda CX-5 采用 FWD 驱动方式。

Chery Tiggo Cross 采用 FWD 驱动方式。

两款车的驱动方式一样，都是 FWD，日常驾驶感受不会有太大区别。

适合什么样的人

Mazda CX-5 和 Chery Tiggo Cross 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择，适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价，可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款；如果你更在意性价比和配备，那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾，亲身体验才是最重要的。

总结

总的来说，Mazda CX-5 和 Chery Tiggo Cross 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。

车型概览

Perodua Ativa 值不值得买，关键不是它看起来有多吸引，而是它能不能解决你的真实用车需求。这篇文章会把重点放在长途稳定感和乘客舒适度。 近期围绕这款车的讨论包括「Perodua Ativa Hybrid Confirmed for Local CKD Production – Malaysia's First Mass-Market Hybrid SUV Arrives Soon」，说明它在本地买家视野里仍有关注度。

价格落在 RM 62,500 - 73,400，买家可以先用它判断预算压力和同级定位。

购车价格指南

Perodua Ativa 的购车预算可以先从 RM 62,500 - 73,400 开始衡量。这个数字真正影响的是月供、保险和现金流，而不只是展厅里的标价。

如果你在几个版本之间犹豫，可以把 2025 1.0T AV 2-Tone Special Metallic Black Roof（RM 73,400）、2025 1.0T AV Special Metallic（RM 73,100）、2025 1.0T AV Metallic（RM 72,600）、2025 1.0T H Special Metallic（RM 67,800） 放在同一张清单里比较。日常通勤买家优先看舒适与安全，常跑高速的买家则更应重视动力、辅助驾驶和座舱便利。

核心参数汇总

看 Perodua Ativa 的核心规格，最重要是把数字翻译成生活里的感受。

涡轮增压、3缸的动力底子，适合拿来判断市区跟车和高速巡航是否轻松。 98 Ps、140 N·m的输出，真正意义在于满载、上坡和超车时不会太吃力。 5.29 L/100km的油耗，对每天通勤的人来说会直接影响加油频率。 车长 4065 mm、车宽 1710 mm、车高 1635 mm、轴距 2525 mm，可以帮助你预判停车难度和后排乘坐空间。

优缺点分析

Perodua Ativa 的优点不必夸张，真正有价值的是它能不能让日常使用更省心：预算位置清楚，方便和同级车直接比较、日常能源成本有明确参考、动力输出能支撑高速和超车需求。

需要留意的是，市区停车和狭窄路段仍要看个人驾驶习惯。这些不是扣分项，而是下订前应该先想清楚的生活细节。

购车常见问题解答

购买 Perodua Ativa 前，买家最常问的不是单一规格，而是它能不能融入自己的生活。

这辆车适合谁？适合把长途稳定感和乘客舒适度放在首位的买家。 家庭用户要看什么？优先看后排乘坐、儿童座椅、行李和日常上下车是否顺手。 每天开会不会麻烦？5.29 L/100km 的油耗参考让通勤成本更容易预估。

竞品对比内容

把 Perodua Ativa 放进同级车名单时，不建议只看品牌或外形。真正有用的比较顺序是：先用 RM 62,500 - 73,400 锁定预算圈、再看动力是否足够应付高速和满载、接着比较能源成本和补能便利、最后看空间是否适合家人和行李。

这样筛选出来的结果更贴近日常生活。你会更清楚它是适合城市通勤、家庭代步、长途巡航，还是更适合作为一辆讲求个性的选择。

用车全周期指南

拥有 Perodua Ativa 的日常成本，最直接会反映在燃油、保险、轮胎和定期保养上。5.29 L/100km 的油耗让通勤预算更容易掌握。

如果你常跑南北大道，动力和座舱舒适度会比单纯低价更重要；如果主要在市区，停车灵活性、视野和低速顺滑度会更影响心情。