Homebuah
Search History
Popular Searches
Dealer Login / Sign Up
在马来西亚的SUV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Volvo XC40 和 BMW X1 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Volvo XC40 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 278,888 - 278,888，一共有 1 个版本，包括 2025 2.0T Plus（RM 278,888） 等。
BMW X1 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 252,800 - 252,800，一共有 2 个版本，包括 sDrive18i（RM 220,000）、sDrive20i（RM 250,000） 等。
从价钱来看，BMW X1 的起步价比 Volvo XC40 便宜了 RM 26,088。老实讲，在这个价位段，几千块的差距其实不算大，关键还是看整体的性价比和长期使用成本。
Volvo XC40 搭载 2.0L Turbo，马力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
BMW X1 搭载 2.0L Turbo，马力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
两款车用的是同一套动力系统，日常开起来的感受基本没有差别。油耗方面也差不多，不用太纠结这一点。
Volvo XC40 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
BMW X1 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
两款车的尺寸几乎一样，车内空间差别不大。这个级别的车，日常使用完全够用。
Volvo XC40 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
BMW X1 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
两款车的驱动方式一样，都是 FWD，日常驾驶感受不会有太大区别。
Volvo XC40 保修 5年/无限里程，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
BMW X1 保修 5年/无限里程，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
两款车的保修条件一样，这方面不用纠结。实际保养成本还要看品牌的服务网络和零件价格，建议去车友群问问真实车主的经验。
总的来说，Volvo XC40 和 BMW X1 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
在马来西亚的SUV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Hyundai Santa Fe 和 Audi Q5 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Hyundai Santa Fe 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 225,000 - 270,000，一共有 3 个版本，包括 2025 2.5T DCT 4WD Calligraphy 6 Seats（RM 270,000）、2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige 7 Seats（RM 245,000）、2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prime 7 Seats（RM 225,000） 等。
Audi Q5 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 354,174 - 423,174，一共有 2 个版本，包括 40 TDI（RM 320,000）、45 TFSI（RM 350,000） 等。
从价钱来看，Hyundai Santa Fe 的起步价确实比 Audi Q5 便宜了 RM 129,174。如果你预算有限，Hyundai 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意，便宜的那几千块，可能在配备上会有取舍，具体要看你的需求。
Hyundai Santa Fe 的安全评级是 TBD，主动安全系统包括 Basic。
Audi Q5 的安全评级是 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Pre Sense + ACC。
安全配备方面，两款车都拿到了不错的评级。不过 Hyundai Santa Fe 的 Basic 和 Audi Q5 的 Pre Sense + ACC 在功能上有些差异，如果你比较看重主动安全的话，可以仔细对比一下两者的功能列表。
Hyundai Santa Fe 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
Audi Q5 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
两款车的尺寸几乎一样，车内空间差别不大。这个级别的车，日常使用完全够用。
Hyundai Santa Fe 和 Audi Q5 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择，适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价，可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款；如果你更在意性价比和配备，那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾，亲身体验才是最重要的。
总的来说，Hyundai Santa Fe 和 Audi Q5 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
在马来西亚的SUV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Mitsubishi Xforce 和 Volkswagen Tiguan 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Mitsubishi Xforce 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 109,930 - 119,930，一共有 2 个版本，包括 2026 1.5L Ultimate（RM 119,930）、2026 1.5L Urban（RM 109,930） 等。
Volkswagen Tiguan 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 206,540 - 260,024，一共有 2 个版本，包括 2025 Allspace 2.0T R-Line（RM 260,024）、2025 Allspace 1.4T Elegance（RM 206,540） 等。
从价钱来看，Mitsubishi Xforce 的起步价确实比 Volkswagen Tiguan 便宜了 RM 96,610。如果你预算有限，Mitsubishi 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意，便宜的那几千块，可能在配备上会有取舍，具体要看你的需求。
Mitsubishi Xforce 搭载 1.5L Turbo，马力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Volkswagen Tiguan 搭载 2.0L 4-cyl，马力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
动力方面，Volkswagen Tiguan 的 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Mitsubishi Xforce 的 1.5L Turbo 多了 30 匹马力。不过日常在市区开，两款车的动力都够用，不会觉得不够力。
Mitsubishi Xforce 的安全评级是 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 MI-PILOT。
Volkswagen Tiguan 的安全评级是 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 IQ.Drive。
安全配备方面，两款车都拿到了不错的评级。不过 Mitsubishi Xforce 的 MI-PILOT 和 Volkswagen Tiguan 的 IQ.Drive 在功能上有些差异，如果你比较看重主动安全的话，可以仔细对比一下两者的功能列表。
Mitsubishi Xforce 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Volkswagen Tiguan 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
两款车的驱动方式一样，都是 FWD，日常驾驶感受不会有太大区别。
Mitsubishi Xforce 和 Volkswagen Tiguan 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择，适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价，可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款；如果你更在意性价比和配备，那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾，亲身体验才是最重要的。
总的来说，Mitsubishi Xforce 和 Volkswagen Tiguan 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
在马来西亚的SUV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 和 Subaru Forester 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 159,750 - 159,750，一共有 2 个版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000） 等。
Subaru Forester 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 174,000 - 197,000，一共有 3 个版本，包括 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition（RM 189,538）、2024 2.0L S EyeSight（RM 177,538）、2024 2.0L L EyeSight（RM 167,538） 等。
从价钱来看，Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 的起步价确实比 Subaru Forester 便宜了 RM 14,250。如果你预算有限，Chery 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意，便宜的那几千块，可能在配备上会有取舍，具体要看你的需求。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 搭载 2.0L 4-cyl，马力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
Subaru Forester 搭载 2.0L 4-cyl，马力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
两款车用的是同一套动力系统，日常开起来的感受基本没有差别。油耗方面也差不多，不用太纠结这一点。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
Subaru Forester 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
两款车的尺寸几乎一样，车内空间差别不大。这个级别的车，日常使用完全够用。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Subaru Forester 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
两款车的驱动方式一样，都是 FWD，日常驾驶感受不会有太大区别。
总的来说，Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 和 Subaru Forester 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
在马来西亚的SUV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Mazda CX-80 和 Audi Q7 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Mazda CX-80 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 296,610 - 296,610，一共有 1 个版本，包括 2025 2.5L 65km High Plus（RM 296,610） 等。
Audi Q7 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 462,222 - 462,222，一共有 1 个版本，包括 Standard（RM 462,222） 等。
从价钱来看，Mazda CX-80 的起步价确实比 Audi Q7 便宜了 RM 165,612。如果你预算有限，Mazda 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意，便宜的那几千块，可能在配备上会有取舍，具体要看你的需求。
Mazda CX-80 的安全评级是 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Brand ADAS。
Audi Q7 的安全评级是 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Premium ADAS。
安全配备方面，两款车都拿到了不错的评级。不过 Mazda CX-80 的 Brand ADAS 和 Audi Q7 的 Premium ADAS 在功能上有些差异，如果你比较看重主动安全的话，可以仔细对比一下两者的功能列表。
Mazda CX-80 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Audi Q7 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
两款车的驱动方式一样，都是 FWD，日常驾驶感受不会有太大区别。
Mazda CX-80 和 Audi Q7 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择，适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价，可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款；如果你更在意性价比和配备，那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾，亲身体验才是最重要的。
总的来说，Mazda CX-80 和 Audi Q7 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
在马来西亚的SUV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Mazda CX-8 和 Volvo XC60 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Mazda CX-8 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 165,360 - 201,360，一共有 5 个版本，包括 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol（RM 201,360）、2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel（RM 193,123）、2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol（RM 186,360） 等。
Volvo XC60 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 328,888 - 328,888，一共有 1 个版本，包括 2025 2.0T Core（RM 328,888） 等。
从价钱来看，Mazda CX-8 的起步价确实比 Volvo XC60 便宜了 RM 163,528。如果你预算有限，Mazda 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意，便宜的那几千块，可能在配备上会有取舍，具体要看你的需求。
Mazda CX-8 搭载 2.0L 4-cyl，马力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
Volvo XC60 搭载 2.0L Turbo，马力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
动力方面，Volvo XC60 的 2.0L Turbo 比 Mazda CX-8 的 2.0L 4-cyl 多了 50 匹马力。不过日常在市区开，两款车的动力都够用，不会觉得不够力。
Mazda CX-8 车身长 4500 mm，后备箱 450 L。
Volvo XC60 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
空间方面，Mazda CX-8 的车身比 Volvo XC60 长了 100 mm，车内乘坐空间会稍微宽裕一些，尤其是后座腿部空间。如果你经常载家人或者需要放婴儿车，大一点的车身确实更实用。
Mazda CX-8 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Volvo XC60 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
两款车的驱动方式一样，都是 FWD，日常驾驶感受不会有太大区别。
Mazda CX-8 和 Volvo XC60 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择，适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价，可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款；如果你更在意性价比和配备，那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾，亲身体验才是最重要的。
总的来说，Mazda CX-8 和 Volvo XC60 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
在马来西亚的SUV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Toyota Harrier 和 Mercedes-Benz GLA 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Toyota Harrier 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 289,000 - 289,000，一共有 1 个版本，包括 2026 HEV 2.5L Standard（RM 289,000） 等。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 258,888 - 295,888，一共有 1 个版本，包括 Standard（RM 258,888） 等。
从价钱来看，Mercedes-Benz GLA 的起步价比 Toyota Harrier 便宜了 RM 30,112。老实讲，在这个价位段，几千块的差距其实不算大，关键还是看整体的性价比和长期使用成本。
Toyota Harrier 的安全评级是 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Brand ADAS。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 的安全评级是 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Premium ADAS。
安全配备方面，两款车都拿到了不错的评级。不过 Toyota Harrier 的 Brand ADAS 和 Mercedes-Benz GLA 的 Premium ADAS 在功能上有些差异，如果你比较看重主动安全的话，可以仔细对比一下两者的功能列表。
Toyota Harrier 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
两款车的尺寸几乎一样，车内空间差别不大。这个级别的车，日常使用完全够用。
Toyota Harrier 保修 5年/无限制里程，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 保修 3年/100,000km，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
Toyota Harrier 和 Mercedes-Benz GLA 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择，适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价，可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款；如果你更在意性价比和配备，那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾，亲身体验才是最重要的。
总的来说，Toyota Harrier 和 Mercedes-Benz GLA 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
在马来西亚的SUV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Honda CR-V 和 Toyota Fortuner 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Honda CR-V 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 178,200 - 195,900，一共有 4 个版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS（RM 195,900）、2026 1.5T 4WD V（RM 181,900）、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E（RM 178,200） 等。
Toyota Fortuner 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 195,880 - 241,880，一共有 3 个版本，包括 2024 2.8T VRZ Diesel（RM 241,880）、2024 2.7L SRZ Petrol（RM 202,880）、2024 2.4L Standard Diesel（RM 195,880） 等。
从价钱来看，Honda CR-V 的起步价确实比 Toyota Fortuner 便宜了 RM 17,680。如果你预算有限，Honda 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意，便宜的那几千块，可能在配备上会有取舍，具体要看你的需求。
Honda CR-V 搭载 2.0L 4-cyl，马力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
Toyota Fortuner 搭载 2.5L Diesel，马力 187 hp。官方油耗 8.5 L/100km。
动力方面，Toyota Fortuner 的 2.5L Diesel 比 Honda CR-V 的 2.0L 4-cyl 多了 17 匹马力。不过日常在市区开，两款车的动力都够用，不会觉得不够力。
Honda CR-V 的安全评级是 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。
Toyota Fortuner 的安全评级是 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 。
两款车的安全评级一样，在这个级别里面安全配备都算给得很齐全了。现在的新车安全性都不差，不用太担心这一点。
Honda CR-V 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Toyota Fortuner 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
两款车的驱动方式一样，都是 FWD，日常驾驶感受不会有太大区别。
Honda CR-V 和 Toyota Fortuner 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择，适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价，可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款；如果你更在意性价比和配备，那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾，亲身体验才是最重要的。
总的来说，Honda CR-V 和 Toyota Fortuner 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
在马来西亚的SUV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Honda HR-V 和 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Honda HR-V 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 115,900 - 143,900，一共有 4 个版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS（RM 143,900）、2026 1.5T V（RM 137,900）、2026 1.5T E（RM 130,900） 等。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 159,750 - 159,750，一共有 2 个版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000） 等。
从价钱来看，Honda HR-V 的起步价确实比 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 便宜了 RM 43,850。如果你预算有限，Honda 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意，便宜的那几千块，可能在配备上会有取舍，具体要看你的需求。
Honda HR-V 的安全评级是 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 的安全评级是 TBD，主动安全系统包括 Basic。
安全配备方面，两款车都拿到了不错的评级。不过 Honda HR-V 的 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM) 和 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 的 Basic 在功能上有些差异，如果你比较看重主动安全的话，可以仔细对比一下两者的功能列表。
Honda HR-V 车身长 4500 mm，后备箱 450 L。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
空间方面，Honda HR-V 的车身比 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 长了 100 mm，车内乘坐空间会稍微宽裕一些，尤其是后座腿部空间。如果你经常载家人或者需要放婴儿车，大一点的车身确实更实用。
Honda HR-V 保修 5年/无限制里程，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 保修 3年/100,000km，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
Honda HR-V 和 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择，适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价，可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款；如果你更在意性价比和配备，那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾，亲身体验才是最重要的。
总的来说，Honda HR-V 和 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
在马来西亚的SUV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Honda HR-V 和 Mazda CX-30 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Honda HR-V 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 115,900 - 143,900，一共有 4 个版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS（RM 143,900）、2026 1.5T V（RM 137,900）、2026 1.5T E（RM 130,900） 等。
Mazda CX-30 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 122,409 - 146,409，一共有 4 个版本，包括 2025 2.0L High+ Premium（RM 146,409）、2025 2.0L High+（RM 138,409）、2025 2.0L High（RM 130,409） 等。
从价钱来看，Honda HR-V 的起步价确实比 Mazda CX-30 便宜了 RM 6,509。如果你预算有限，Honda 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意，便宜的那几千块，可能在配备上会有取舍，具体要看你的需求。
Honda HR-V 搭载 1.5L Turbo，马力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Mazda CX-30 搭载 1.5L Turbo，马力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
两款车用的是同一套动力系统，日常开起来的感受基本没有差别。油耗方面也差不多，不用太纠结这一点。
Honda HR-V 的安全评级是 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。
Mazda CX-30 的安全评级是 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 i-Activsense。
两款车的安全评级一样，在这个级别里面安全配备都算给得很齐全了。现在的新车安全性都不差，不用太担心这一点。
Honda HR-V 车身长 4500 mm，后备箱 450 L。
Mazda CX-30 车身长 4500 mm，后备箱 450 L。
两款车的尺寸几乎一样，车内空间差别不大。这个级别的车，日常使用完全够用。
Honda HR-V 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Mazda CX-30 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
两款车的驱动方式一样，都是 FWD，日常驾驶感受不会有太大区别。
总的来说，Honda HR-V 和 Mazda CX-30 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
在马来西亚的SUV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Honda WR-V 和 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Honda WR-V 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 89,900 - 107,900，一共有 4 个版本，包括 2023 1.5L V（RM 99,900）、2023 1.5L E（RM 95,900）、2023 1.5L S（RM 89,900） 等。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 123,750 - 123,750，一共有 2 个版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 125,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 140,000） 等。
从价钱来看，Honda WR-V 的起步价确实比 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 便宜了 RM 33,850。如果你预算有限，Honda 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意，便宜的那几千块，可能在配备上会有取舍，具体要看你的需求。
Honda WR-V 的安全评级是 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Honda SENSING。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 的安全评级是 TBD，主动安全系统包括 Basic。
安全配备方面，两款车都拿到了不错的评级。不过 Honda WR-V 的 Honda SENSING 和 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 的 Basic 在功能上有些差异，如果你比较看重主动安全的话，可以仔细对比一下两者的功能列表。
Honda WR-V 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
两款车的尺寸几乎一样，车内空间差别不大。这个级别的车，日常使用完全够用。
Honda WR-V 保修 5年/无限制里程，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 保修 3年/100,000km，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
总的来说，Honda WR-V 和 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
车型概览
Volvo ES90 值不值得买，关键不是它看起来有多吸引，而是它能不能解决你的真实用车需求。这篇文章会把重点放在它和同级车相比的生活适配度。 近期围绕这款车的讨论包括「Volvo Car Malaysia’s Selamat Raya Sales Event: Up to RM60k Rebate」，说明它在本地买家视野里仍有关注度。
价格落在 RM 339,888，买家可以先用它判断预算压力和同级定位。
购车价格指南
Volvo ES90 的购车预算可以先从 RM 339,888 开始衡量。这个数字真正影响的是月供、保险和现金流，而不只是展厅里的标价。
如果你在几个版本之间犹豫，可以把 2026 651km Ultra（RM 339,888）、2025 651km Ultra（RM 339,888） 放在同一张清单里比较。日常通勤买家优先看舒适与安全，常跑高速的买家则更应重视动力、辅助驾驶和座舱便利。
核心参数汇总
看 Volvo ES90 的核心规格，最重要是把数字翻译成生活里的感受。
92 kWh的电池容量，重点是能不能支撑一周通勤和周末出门。 15.9 kWh/100km的耗电表现，会影响你多久需要补一次电。 245 kW、480 N·m的输出，让高速并线和短距离超车更有底气。 车长 5000 mm、车宽 1942 mm、车高 1546 mm、轴距 3102 mm，可以帮助你预判停车难度和后排乘坐空间。
优缺点分析
Volvo ES90 的优点不必夸张，真正有价值的是它能不能让日常使用更省心：预算位置清楚，方便和同级车直接比较、日常能源成本有明确参考、动力输出能支撑高速和超车需求。
需要留意的是，需要先确认家里、公司或常去商场的充电条件、市区停车和狭窄路段仍要看个人驾驶习惯。这些不是扣分项，而是下订前应该先想清楚的生活细节。
购车常见问题解答
购买 Volvo ES90 前，买家最常问的不是单一规格，而是它能不能融入自己的生活。
这辆车适合谁？适合把它和同级车相比的生活适配度放在首位的买家。 家庭用户要看什么？优先看后排乘坐、儿童座椅、行李和日常上下车是否顺手。 每天开会不会麻烦？只要充电条件稳定，电动车的通勤体验通常更安静，也更容易控制日常能源成本。
竞品对比内容
把 Volvo ES90 放进同级车名单时，不建议只看品牌或外形。真正有用的比较顺序是：先用 RM 339,888 锁定预算圈、再看动力是否足够应付高速和满载、接着比较能源成本和补能便利、最后看空间是否适合家人和行李。
这样筛选出来的结果更贴近日常生活。你会更清楚它是适合城市通勤、家庭代步、长途巡航，还是更适合作为一辆讲求个性的选择。
用车全周期指南
拥有 Volvo ES90 的关键，是先把充电安排想清楚。家充、公司充电或商场快充只要其中一项稳定，日常体验就会轻松很多。
如果你常跑南北大道，动力和座舱舒适度会比单纯低价更重要；如果主要在市区，停车灵活性、视野和低速顺滑度会更影响心情。
车型概览
Forthing T5L 值不值得买，关键不是它看起来有多吸引，而是它能不能解决你的真实用车需求。这篇文章会把重点放在长途稳定感和乘客舒适度。
版本方面，Forthing T5L 目前可围绕 2022 1.5T AT Standard、2022 1.8T MT Standard、2026 1.5T DCT Exclusive、2026 1.5T DCT Luxury 来比较。
购车价格指南
评估 Forthing T5L 的购车预算时，建议先从版本定位和后续拥车成本下手。价格不是唯一重点，真正决定是否划算的是每天会不会用到那些配置。
如果你在几个版本之间犹豫，可以把 2022 1.5T AT Standard、2022 1.8T MT Standard、2026 1.5T DCT Exclusive、2026 1.5T DCT Luxury 放在同一张清单里比较。日常通勤买家优先看舒适与安全，常跑高速的买家则更应重视动力、辅助驾驶和座舱便利。
核心参数汇总
看 Forthing T5L 的核心规格，最重要是把数字翻译成生活里的感受。
涡轮增压、4缸、1468 mL 排量的动力底子，适合拿来判断市区跟车和高速巡航是否轻松。 156 Ps、230 N·m的输出，真正意义在于满载、上坡和超车时不会太吃力。 车长 4780 mm、车宽 1872 mm、车高 1760 mm、轴距 2753 mm，可以帮助你预判停车难度和后排乘坐空间。 自动变速箱 变速箱、前轮驱动布局 的设定，会影响起步顺滑度、湿地稳定感和长途巡航感。
优缺点分析
Forthing T5L 的优点不必夸张，真正有价值的是它能不能让日常使用更省心：动力输出能支撑高速和超车需求、空间和车身尺寸便于家庭买家预判实用性。
需要留意的是，市区停车和狭窄路段仍要看个人驾驶习惯。这些不是扣分项，而是下订前应该先想清楚的生活细节。
购车常见问题解答
购买 Forthing T5L 前，买家最常问的不是单一规格，而是它能不能融入自己的生活。
这辆车适合谁？适合把长途稳定感和乘客舒适度放在首位的买家。 家庭用户要看什么？优先看后排乘坐、儿童座椅、行李和日常上下车是否顺手。 每天开会不会麻烦？如果能源成本、停车便利和版本配置都符合你的生活节奏，它会比较容易相处。
竞品对比内容
把 Forthing T5L 放进同级车名单时，不建议只看品牌或外形。真正有用的比较顺序是：再看动力是否足够应付高速和满载、最后看空间是否适合家人和行李。
这样筛选出来的结果更贴近日常生活。你会更清楚它是适合城市通勤、家庭代步、长途巡航，还是更适合作为一辆讲求个性的选择。
用车全周期指南
拥有 Forthing T5L 的重点，是确认保险、路税、保养和轮胎成本都在可接受范围内。买车不是一次付款结束，而是每天都要相处。
如果你常跑南北大道，动力和座舱舒适度会比单纯低价更重要；如果主要在市区，停车灵活性、视野和低速顺滑度会更影响心情。
On May 28, 2026, SAIC Group held the "First Global 100 Millionth User Delivery Ceremony" grandly at the Shanghai North Bund World Living Room. More than ten whole vehicle brands and 19 main models under SAIC, with the innovative form of "Global Relay Delivery", spanned continents and linked domestic and overseas markets, officially declaring SAIC Group as the first in China's automotive industry to break 100 million in cumulative production and sales, carving a historic milestone for the development of China's automotive industry.
From the first "Phoenix" sedan born in 1958, to today's global automotive group with a scale of 100 million vehicles; from local car making hammered by hand, to full industry chain synergy and intelligent manufacturing of Chinese globalization; from single product output to technology, brand, and service full value chain going global, SAIC has written the era's answer for Chinese cars to catch up, run alongside, and go from local to global with over 70 years of progress. 100 million vehicles is not only a quantum leap in production and sales scale, but also a heavy load of 100 million units of user trust, a testament to the strength of China's automotive industry's rise.
I. Over 70 Years of Progress: From "Zero Breakthrough" to "100 Million-Level Leap"
The development history of SAIC Group is a condensed history of China's automotive industry's progress.
In 1955, the Shanghai Internal Combustion Engine Parts Manufacturing Company was established, and Shanghai's automotive industry officially set sail. In 1958, the first generation of automotive workers manually assembled the first **"Phoenix" sedan**, achieving a "zero breakthrough" in Shanghai sedan manufacturing, opening the difficult exploration of China's independent car making. At that time, conditions were simple and technology was weak, but the seed of steadfastness for independence and pursuit of quality was planted.
After the Reform and Opening Up, SAIC seized the opportunity of the times and entered a new stage of joint cooperation and rapid growth. In 1983, the Santana officially came off the line, not only opening the tide of popularization of Chinese household sedans, but also driving the establishment of a modern automotive parts supporting system, promoting the systemization and standardization upgrade of China's automotive manufacturing system. In 1997, SAIC General Motors was established, achieving a "Shanghai Speed" with 23 months to go from "building factory to delivering vehicles", refreshing industry records, and simultaneously building the first joint venture exclusive automotive R&D and design center domestically, achieving a leap from manufacturing to R&D.
Entering the new century, SAIC firmly promoted independent innovation and brand upward movement. In 2006, the Roewe brand was born, sounding the horn for the comprehensive rise of independent passenger cars; in 2016, the world's first Internet car Roewe RX5 went on sale, opening a new era of automotive intelligence; in 2020, IM Motors appeared, targeting the global luxury market with a high-end intelligent electric track. From fuel vehicles to new energy, from traditional manufacturing to intelligent electric, from local layout to global operations, SAIC has always been at the forefront of industry transformation.
For over 70 years of wind and rain, SAIC has always adhered to the core concept of **"Know Cars, Know You Better"**. "Know Cars", is the ultimate pursuit of core technologies, is the continuous breakthrough of cutting-edge technologies such as full wire-controlled chassis, semi-solid state batteries, AI large models, intelligent driving; "Know You", is to convert hardcore technology into user-perceivable and enjoyalbe travel experiences, letting every innovation serve real car usage scenarios. From the first vehicle to the first 100 millionth vehicle, what changes is scale and technology, what remains unchanged is the original intention of sticking to quality and serving users. 100 million vehicles is the most powerful fulfillment of this original intention.
Full System Strength Support: Full Brand Matrix + Global Layout, Casting the Foundation of 100 Million Vehicles
Behind the 100 million vehicle scale is SAIC's full value chain closed-loop system covering six sectors: whole vehicles, parts, mobility, financial services, international operations, and innovative technology, and the strong comprehensive strength of synergy between independent and joint ventures, passenger and commercial vehicles, and domestic and overseas linkage.
Sales data corroborates hardcore strength: From January to April 2026, SAIC Group's cumulative sales reached 1.302 million vehicles, ranking first among Chinese automakers for four consecutive months; among them, independent brand sales were 910,000 vehicles, accounting for nearly 70%, becoming the core engine of growth; new energy vehicle sales were 412,000 vehicles, stably in the first echelon of the industry; overseas market sales were 459,000 vehicles, surging 50.2% year-on-year, continuing to lead Chinese brand exports.
This global relay delivery, SAIC's full brand matrix made a powerful appearance. Independent brands went all out: Shangjie Z7, Huajing S, Roewe M7, MG4 Semi-Solid State Battery Version, Wuling Starlight 560, Maxus eDeliver5, Hongyan Heavy Truck, Yuexing Dana T1, SUNWIN Electric Bus, Iveco Juzing EV and other models were delivered in batches, covering household commuting, family travel, business operations, logistics transportation, urban public transport all scenarios, meeting users' diversified needs.
Joint ventures entered the "Joint Venture 2.0" technology co-innovation stage, showing heavy results: Volkswagen ID. ERA 9X globally debuted with Momenta R7 Reinforced Learning World Model, delivered over 7,000 units in the first month of listing; AUDI E7X is planned to become Audi's first model globally landing L3-level autonomous driving; Buick Zhijing E7 is built on the "Xiaoyao" Super Fusion Architecture, sales broke 10,000 units in the first month of listing. From "Market for Technology" to "Technology Defines Products", SAIC achieved a complete role leap, leading the new direction of high-quality development of joint ventures.
Global layout is the key support for SAIC's 100 million leap. As a pioneer in Chinese automotive "Going Global", SAIC has already deployed over 100 parts bases and over 3000 dealer outlets overseas, built 3 Global R&D Centers in London, as well as 4 overseas manufacturing bases in Thailand, Indonesia, India, Pakistan; Anji Logistics formed 42 professional Ro-Ro ships, opened 8 international routes, building an efficient global logistics system.
Currently, SAIC's products and services have covered over 170 countries and regions worldwide, with cumulative overseas sales breaking 7 million vehicles. MG brand ranked first among Chinese brands in European sales for 11 consecutive years, European annual sales broke 300,000 in 2025, becoming the first Chinese automotive brand to break 1 million in cumulative sales in Europe and the UK. In March 2026, MG released Semi-Solid State Battery and Hybrid + Hybrid Technology in Germany, breaking 20,000 units in a single month overseas, winning global market recognition with hardcore technology. SAIC is moving from "Product Going Global" to "Value Chain Going Global", letting Chinese Intelligent Manufacturing shine on the global stage.
User-Centric: 100 Million Trusts, Originating from "Know Cars, Know You Better"
SAIC's 100 million leap is essentially the accumulation and precipitation of user trust. In this delivery gala, there was no grand technology presentation, but focused on every real user, letting ordinary people become the protagonists, vividly interpreting the deep connotation of "Know Cars, Know You Better".
GET App founder Luo Zhenyu served as the 001st Experience Officer for Huajing S, from praising Huawei Qiankun Smart Driving to deeply visiting the factory to witness the off-line, recognizing SAIC's dual strength of technology and quality; former national team player Yang Chen chose Volkswagen ID. ERA 9X, valuing its high-efficiency range extender system and consistency with long-termism values; charity blogger Liu Jia stuck to mountain area charity for five years, was moved by Buick Zhijing E7's "Full Score Cockpit"; London doctor Natalia inherited family MG sentiment, returning couple brought overseas car usage memories back to the motherland; there were also bulk users such as logistics enterprises, bus companies, tourism teams, letting SAIC become a reliable partner for fighters.
From tech bloggers to sports stars, from public welfare persons to entrepreneurs, from overseas users to local families, every user's choice is an endorsement of SAIC products and services. SAIC always insists that the ultimate value of technology is to serve people, the ultimate goal of car making is to guard every journey, warming every family. 100 million vehicles is the carrying of 100 million life stories, the guard of 100 million beautiful journeys, and more 100 million heavy trusts.
At the product level, SAIC oriented by user needs, built a product matrix covering all categories, all price points, all scenarios. Home cars pursue comfort and energy saving, high-end car owners focus on intelligent luxury, commercial vehicles focus on reliability and efficiency, new energy vehicles achieve range and safety balance. At the same time, continuously upgrading quality and experience, from infant-level healthy cockpit, full domain security protection, to intelligent interaction, comfortable chassis, every detail is polished around users' real car usage scenarios, letting high-end inclusion, letting technology approachable.
Start New Journey: Starting from 100 Million Level, Towards the New Era of Smart Electric
100 million vehicles is a milestone, but also a new starting point. Facing the wave of smart electrification, SAIC in the posture of "Second Entrepreneurship", full sprint for new heights of the global automotive market.
Technology innovation continues to lead: Deeply cultivating solid / semi-solid batteries, full wire-controlled chassis, AI large models, high-level intelligent driving and other cutting-edge technologies, promoting core technology autonomous and controllable; global R&D system synergy effort, quickly transforming laboratory technology into mass production configuration, letting users enjoy tech dividends first.
Brand upward movement is unswerving: Strengthen IM, Roewe, MG, Wuling and other independent matrices, upgrade Volkswagen, Audi, Buick and other joint venture brands, form a high-low matching, domestic and overseas coordinated brand system, meeting global users' differentiated needs.
Global strategy depth promotion: Deepen "Glocal" Global + Local strategy, expand overseas production capacity and channel layout, promote technology, standards, services synchronously going global, improving Chinese automotive brands' global voice.
User service comprehensive upgrade: Stick to "Know Cars, Know You Better" concept, with user full lifecycle experience as the core, building a more considerate, more convenient, more intelligent service system, letting every user feel SAIC's temperature and sincerity.
From 1955 to 2026, from the first vehicle to the first 100 millionth vehicle, SAIC witnessed and promoted China's automotive industry from nothing to something, from weak to strong. 100 million leap is a breakthrough of scale, a victory of technology, a result of globalization, and more a crystallization of user trust.
Standing at a brand new historical starting point, SAIC will continue to adhere to the original intention, stick to innovation, deep dive into users, lead globally, walk together with 100 million users and global partners, with the power of Chinese Intelligent Manufacturing, create a better travel future together, and continue to contribute to China moving from an automotive powerhouse to an automotive strong country!
June 15, 1405, the 3rd Year of Yongle of the Ming Dynasty.
Emperor Chengzu ordered Zheng He, a fourth-rank Director of the Palace Affairs, to lead a fleet of over 240 large ships with 27,400 crew members to set sail and visit more than 30 countries in the western Pacific and Indian Oceans.
Zheng He's fleet was loaded with export trade goods such as blue-and-white porcelain, silk, gold and silver ware, spices, and also ceremonial clothing, ritual vessels, and exquisite silk textiles bestowed by the Ming Emperor to governors of various countries.
This fleet commanded by Zheng Hethe largest fleet in the world at that timesailed to the Western Seas seven times, and its route was later called by historians the Maritime Silk Road.
Today, more than 600 years later, another much larger ship whistles and sets sail again.
But this time, there are no exquisite silks and ceramics on board,but rather, it is filled with automobiles, new energy vehicles.
The overseas journey of Chinese automakers began from here.
01. The Front Line Does Not Lie
A fact is, over the past 5 years, the strategy of many traditional brands globally has been two words,Retract.
The Mercedes-Benz passenger car factory in Brazil was shut down, Ford even no longer produces complete vehicles in Brazil, GM withdrew from Thailand manufacturing, Nissan closed the Barcelona factory in Spain... and there are many European factories where capacity utilization is even less than 10%.
Taking over areChinese automakers who have been expanding wildly overseas since 2023.
BYD is planning an industrial base in Bahia, Brazil; Chery is restarting the original Nissan Barcelona factory in Spain through Ebro; Great Wall has acquired the original Mercedes-Benz factory in Brazil and the original GM Rayong factory in Thailand; Leapmotor, Dongfeng and other brands are exploring localised production in Europe through Stellantis' existing system.
Some people call this phenomenonthe 2.0 era of going global:
Compared to the complete vehicle export of Era 1.0, Chinese automakers not only knocked open the doors of the world, but also began building new bases globally.
Looking globally, Thailand has become an important production base for brands such as BYD, Changan, GAC Aion, Great Wall, and is also the overseas bridgehead for Southeast Asia and Australia;
Brazil, thanks to cooperative projects with BYD, Great Wall, GAC, Geely/Renault, radiates to the South American auto market;
Turkey still plays the role of the Eurasian land bridge, helping Chinese automakers pry open the doors of the European market and the West Asian region...
In 2025,China's new energy vehicle exports reached 3.43 million units, a 70% surge year-on-year;pure electric vehicle exports reached 2.6 million units, with a market value of about $70 billion, a year-on-year increase of 43%.
Among them, imports from 66 countries exceeded $100 million, and the top three Belgium, UK, and UAE import values were $6.6 billion, $5.9 billion, $3.5 billion respectively—
In the shopping cart of imported goods,for every $3 million gathered, one Chinese electric vehicle must be paired.
Such crazy export growth obviously threatens the cheese of too many people.
The EU's anti-subsidy investigation and additional tariffs are lessons from the past.
Therefore,local factory building has become the only solution for Chinese automakers to go global.It can both avoid tariff risks, reduce logistics costs, further approach terminal users, and meet local policy requirements for employment and taxes,killing three birds with one stone.
According to incomplete statistics, this table of Chinese automaker acquisitions and new factory constructions is really long.
From the data perspective, in the 3-year period from 2022 to 2024, China's enterprises' overseas direct investment in the new energy vehicle value chain averaged $30.4 billion annually,surpassing domestic investment for the first time.
Battle reports may lie, but the front line will not. Agile capital will surely invest money into places with higher profits.
But as the saying goes,The gifts fate gives have long had a price marked in the dark.
02. Is Foreign Money Easy to Earn?
According to data from the China Passenger Car Association, in Q1 2026,the overall profit margin of the auto industry dropped to 3.2%,far below the downstream industry level of 6%, and cut in half compared to previous years.
Automakers exhausted by competition, either actively or passively,have turned their gaze to the overseas market where competition is not saturated.
But for Chinese automakers, building factories overseas, acquiring old factories, taking over idle capacity is not simply copying mature domestic models overseas, but entering a system with completely different laws, unions, supply chains, policies, and brand public opinion.
Among these, hidden dangers also exist.
Some time ago, the International Energy Agency IEA released the report "Global EV Outlook 2026". Among them, one data point is especially thought-provoking:
As of 2025, Chinese automakers' overseas annual capacity reached 1.7 million units, of which Thailand accounted for more than 30%, Indonesia more than 20%, the focus of layout is still in Southeast Asia.
But the question is, the capacity utilization in these two regionsis only 20% and 15%!
This means that Chinese automakers' overseas capacity expansion,faces the first risk: if sales cannot be supported, it will be overcapacity.Either factories idle, or price cuts for promotion.
The second risk point is that old factories bought at low prices may not be bargains, but historical baggage.
Many factories were unscrupulously abandoned by automakers, not necessarily because of weak sales, but possibly due to low production efficiency, old equipment, unsuitable vehicle platform, high production costs, etc.
Taking Russia as an example, after Nissan and Volkswagen withdrew, their old factories were managed by the Russian local enterprise Vaz (which is the Volga we know).
The Lada cars produced by the factory have old technology, and evenlack the high-voltage operating environment required for producing new energy vehicles.Even the employees are technical workers who have been working on fuel cars for their whole lives, completely unable to understand new energy vehicle platforms and fast-paced production.
If rebuilding the three-electric systems, software calibration, electronic electrical architecture, thermal management, and high-voltage safety systems required for producing new energy vehicles,the renovation cost is no different from building a brand new factory,production lines, quality systems, supply chains, personnel training... all need to be readjusted.
The third is union and compliance risks, which are seriously underestimated by many companies.
The high-intensity, high-response speed, and centralized management we are used to domestically,cannot be simply replicated overseas.Accustomed dormitory bunk beds will even attract investigations into labor contracts, accommodation, and working conditions.
Since the power of unions in many countries is extremely great, once they organize strikes,the impact on production will be incomparable,and may even affect future factory approvals, government subsidies, public opinion, investor relations, and brand image.
The fourth risk comes from the supply chain: complete vehicle localization is easy, core component localization is difficult.
The competitiveness of a new energy vehicle core is not in the final assembly factory, but in the whole set ofcost control capabilitiesfrom three-electric to thermal management, from electronic electrical architecture to software, from tires to windows.
Chinese automakers can quickly establish final assembly factories overseas.
But if key components are still imported from China,the problem arises—
Long logistics cycles, high inventory costs; exchange rate fluctuations affect costs; tariff ratios may be adjusted at any time; local after-sales spare parts supply pressure is high; if policy is very tight, key components such as batteries and chips will also undergo review.
Yes, just like European automakers encountered the "strangled by Chinese batteries" situation during electrification transformation.
The last risk is the risk of capacity utilization and market orientation.
As mentioned before, Southeast Asian market scale is small, purchasing power is poor. When can the cheap factory construction plan locally run full capacity?
And Europe with purchasing power has already urgently withdrawn the "2035 ban on fuel vehicle sales" bill,European automakers are about to return to fuel vehicles,even large displacement fuel vehicle production.
At that time, in the European market returning to traditional fuel vehicles, is there still a place for Chinese automakers?
These are all what Chinese automakers preparing to go global must consider.
03. All the Past is a Prologue
For any global enterprise, going overseas must surely bechallenges and opportunities coexisting.
Volkswagen that entered China 40 years ago, Tesla that entered China 10 years ago, BYD, GEELY, GWM... that have beenexpanding their operations globallyin recent years...
Fortunately, putting aside technical advantages, cost control capabilities, and complete component supply chains, Chinese automakers also have the most unique advantage:Users.
In the just passed April, BYD sold 12,754 pure electric vehicles in the UK, surpassing Teslato win the pure sales champion;Chery, thanks to its three-brand strategy, became the number two in sales across all categories without qualifiers,second only to Volkswagen.
In countries and regions where there are no tariff restrictions and automakers can compete fairly,Chinese cars with good quality and low price,are the best choice for users to "live a down-to-earth life".
More than 600 years ago, Zheng He led the fleet to sail to the Western Seas seven times, connecting the ocean, trade, and distance with the attitude of Eastern civilization;
More than 600 years later, today, Chinese automakers have officially launched their own"Age of Discovery".
From Europe to Southeast Asia, from South America to the Middle East, from complete vehicle export to overseas factory building, from acquiring old factories to restarting idle capacity, Chinese automobiles are sailing towards the depths of the new globalindustry system.
This long voyage marks the historical turn of China's automotive industry from a chaser to a participant, from a participant to a shaper.
Admittedly, Chinese automakers need to face more complex global markets, laws and regulations, labor relations, supply chain systems, and also need to build brand trust from scratch above the product.
But belonging to Chinese automakers' one piece,is just setting sail:
Those overseas factories that were re-lit, those production lines that roared again, those cross-border investments and cooperations, are both a proof of China's manufacturing strength and a milestone for Chinese automakersintegrating into the world, taking responsibility, and building industrial ecology together.
In the future, whether able to truly become an important builder of the global automotive industry depends on whether Chinese automakers can take root in different cultural backgrounds, win trust in different markets, and establish cooperation between continents.
All the past is merely a prologue.
New routes have opened up, true long voyage has just begun.
© 2024 Bitauto.com. All Rights Reserved.
Bitauto (www.yiche.com and www.bitauto.com) is one of the most visited automotive websites in China. We provide detailed info on Chinese car brands available in your area. Please note that the information provided on this website is based on publicly available data and is for reference only. It may not be fully updated or accurate at all times.
