In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X90 and Honda WR-V when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X90's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 variants, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
Honda WR-V's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 variants, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
From a price perspective, Honda WR-V's starting price is RM 16,900 cheaper than Proton X90. Honestly, in this price range, a difference of a few thousand is not really significant; the key is to look at overall cost-performance and long-term usage costs.

Proton X90 comes with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
Honda WR-V comes with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.
Regarding power, Proton X90's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Honda WR-V's 1.5L 4-cyl, offering more confidence in mid-range acceleration, especially when overtaking on highways. However, Honda WR-V's fuel consumption might be more friendly, with little difference in daily city commuting.

Proton X90's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Honda WR-V's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety equipment is quite comprehensive for this class. New car safety is generally not bad nowadays, so there's no need to worry too much about this point.

Proton X90 uses FWD drive mode.
Honda WR-V uses FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both FWD, so there won't be much difference in daily driving feel.

Overall, Proton X90 and Honda WR-V are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple car dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter; spending time on research will definitely not be wrong.

Dalam pasaran SUV Malaysia, banyak pembeli membandingkan Proton X70 dan Kia Sportage semasa memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kereta ini memiliki harga dan kedudukan pasaran yang hampir sama, hari ini kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa penyelidikan.
Harga OTR Proton X70 di Malaysia ialah RM 106,800 - 122,300, terdapat 3 varian, termasuk 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300) dan sebagainya.
Harga OTR Kia Sportage di Malaysia ialah RM 129,639 - 179,320, terdapat 4 varian, termasuk 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High (RM 179,320), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High (RM 159,320), 2025 2.0L AT 2WD High (RM 139,639) dan sebagainya.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X70 memang RM 22,839 lebih murah daripada Kia Sportage. Jika bajet anda terhad, versi pengenalan Proton sudah cukup memenuhi keperluan harian. Namun, perlu diingat, perbezaan harga beberapa ribu ringgit ini mungkin melibatkan kompromi dari segi kelengkapan, ia bergantung pada keperluan anda.

Proton X70 menggunakan enjin 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Kecekapan bahan api rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Kia Sportage menggunakan enjin 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Kecekapan bahan api rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Kedua-dua kereta menggunakan sistem kuasa yang sama, perasaan memandu sehari-hari pada dasarnya tiada perbezaan. Dari segi kecekapan bahan api juga hampir sama, tidak perlu terlalu bimbang mengenai hal ini.

Penarafan keselamatan Proton X70 ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Penarafan keselamatan Kia Sportage ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk Drive Wise.
Penarafan keselamatan kedua-dua kereta adalah sama, dalam kelas ini kelengkapan keselamatan dianggap cukup lengkap. Keselamatan kereta baru semasa ini tidak buruk, tidak perlu terlalu bimbang mengenai hal ini.

Proton X70 menggunakan sistem FWD.
Kia Sportage menggunakan sistem FWD.
Sistem pemanduan kedua-dua kereta adalah sama, iaitu FWD, perasaan memandu sehari-hari tidak akan berbeza dengan ketara.
Secara keseluruhannya, Proton X70 dan Kia Sportage adalah model kereta yang sangat bagus di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana, kunci utamanya bergantung pada keperluan peribadi dan bajet anda. Kami cadangkan anda membuat penyelidikan terlebih dahulu, bandingkan sebut harga dari beberapa kedai kereta, kemudian buat uji pemanduan untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa untuk penyelidikan tidak akan salah.

Dalam pasaran SUV Malaysia, ramai pembeli sering membandingkan Proton X70 dan Hyundai Tucson apabila memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kereta ini agak hampir dari segi harga dan sasaran. Hari ini, kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek, membantu anda menjimatkan masa untuk melakukan riset.
Harga OTR Proton X70 di Malaysia ialah RM 106,800 - 122,300, terdapat 3 varian, termasuk 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Hyundai Tucson di Malaysia ialah RM 143,888 - 197,888, terdapat 5 varian, termasuk 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige (RM 197,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige (RM 186,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime (RM 164,888) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, Proton X70 sememangnya lebih murah RM 37,088 daripada Hyundai Tucson dari segi harga asas. Jika bajet anda terhad, varian permulaan Proton sudah boleh memenuhkan keperluan harian. Tetapi, anda perlu ambil perhatian, perbezaan harga beberapa ribu ringgit itu mungkin mempunyai kompromi dari segi kelengkapan, bergantung sepenuhnya kepada keperluan anda.

Gred keselamatan Proton X70 ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Gred keselamatan Hyundai Tucson ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk SmartSense.
Gred keselamatan kedua-dua kereta adalah sama, dalam kategori ini, kelengkapan keselamatan dianggap sangat lengkap. Keamanan kereta baharu semasa tidak buruk, anda tidak perlu risau mengenai perkara ini.

Proton X70 jaminan 5 tahun/150,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Hyundai Tucson jaminan 5 tahun/300,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.

Proton X70 dan Hyundai Tucson adalah pilihan utama pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga dan komuter harian. Jika anda lebih mengutamakan reputasi jenama dan harga kereta terpakai, boleh memilih yang mempunyai reputasi lebih baik terlebih dahulu. Jika anda lebih memberi tumpuan kepada nilai dan kelengkapan, maka pilih yang lebih lengkap peralatannya. Akhir sekali, adalah disyorkan untuk menguji kedua-dua model, pengalaman sendiri adalah yang paling penting.
Secara keseluruhan, Proton X70 dan Hyundai Tucson adalah model kereta yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana, kunci utamanya bergantung kepada keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Kami sarankan untuk membuat riset dengan baik, membandingkan beberapa kutipan harga daripada beberapa dealer kereta, kemudian membuat keputusan akhir selepas ujian memandu. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, menghabiskan sedikit masa untuk riset pasti tidak akan rugi.

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Perodua Ativa 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 做比較。呢兩款車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近,今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細對比,幫你省做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Ativa 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 62,500 - 73,400,一總有 3 個版本,包括 1.0L Turbo X(RM 62,500)、1.0L Turbo H(RM 67,300)、1.0L Turbo AV(RM 73,400)等。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 123,750 - 123,750,一總有 2 個版本,包括 1.6L Turbo Standard(RM 125,000)、1.6L Turbo Premium(RM 140,000)等。
從價錢嚟睇,Perodua Ativa 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 平咗 RM 61,250。如果你預算有限,Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意,平嗰啲幾千蚊,可能喺配備上有取舍,具體要看你嘅需要。

Perodua Ativa 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl,馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 搭載 1.5L Turbo,馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面,Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Perodua Ativa 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開,兩款車嘅動力都夠用,唔會覺得唔夠力。

Perodua Ativa 車身長 4400 mm,尾箱 400 L。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 車身長 4400 mm,尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣,車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車,日常使用完全夠用。

Perodua Ativa 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣,都係 FWD,日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Perodua Ativa 保養 5 年/150,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 保養 3 年/100,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總括嚟講,Perodua Ativa 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車款。揀邊架車,關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。我哋建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Perodua Aruz and Proton X90 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
The Proton X90 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
In terms of price, the Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 33,900 cheaper than the Proton X90. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version is sufficient for daily needs. However, keep in mind that the difference of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.

The Perodua Aruz comes with a 1.5L 4-cyl engine, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.
The Proton X90 comes with a 1.5L Turbo engine, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Proton X90's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than the Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily driving in the city, the power of both cars is sufficient, and you won't feel underpowered.

The Perodua Aruz body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The Proton X90 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. For a car at this level, it is fully sufficient for daily use.

Both the Perodua Aruz and Proton X90 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, consider the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.

Overall, both the Perodua Aruz and Proton X90 are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, compare quotes from several car dealers, and then go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, taking some time to research is never wrong.

Di pasaran SUV Malaysia, ramai pembeli membandingkan Proton X70 dan Chery Tiggo Cross apabila memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kereta ini mempunyai harga dan positioning yang hampir sama, hari ini kita akan buat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek, membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Proton X70 mempunyai harga OTR di Malaysia sebanyak RM 106,800 - 122,300, dengan 3 varian termasuk 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300) dan lain-lain.
Chery Tiggo Cross mempunyai harga OTR di Malaysia sebanyak RM 88,750 - 99,750, dengan 2 varian termasuk 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH (RM 99,750), 2025 1.5T Standard (RM 88,750) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Chery Tiggo Cross lebih murah RM 18,050 berbanding Proton X70. Sejujurnya, dalam julat harga ini, perbezaan ribuan tidak terlalu besar, yang utama adalah nilai kesesuaian dan kos penggunaan jangka panjang.

Proton X70 dilengkapi dengan 1.5L Turbo, kuasa 140 hp. Penggunaan bahan api rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo Cross dilengkapi dengan 1.5L 4-cyl, kuasa 105 hp. Penggunaan bahan api rasmi 6.0 L/100km.
Dari segi kuasa, 1.5L Turbo Proton X70 mempunyai 35 hp lebih daripada 1.5L 4-cyl Chery Tiggo Cross, memberikan keyakinan lebih dalam pemecutan pertengahan, terutamanya ketika memotong di lebuh raya. Namun, penggunaan bahan api Chery Tiggo Cross mungkin lebih efisien, perbezaan untuk perjalanan harian dalam bandar tidak terlalu ketara.

Proton X70 menggunakan cara pemacu FWD.
Chery Tiggo Cross menggunakan cara pemacu FWD.
Kedua-dua kereta ini mempunyai cara pemacu yang sama, iaitu FWD, dan tidak akan ada perbezaan besar dalam perasaan memandu harian.

Proton X70 mempunyai jaminan 5 tahun/150,000km, selang servis setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Chery Tiggo Cross mempunyai jaminan 3 tahun/100,000km, selang servis setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Proton X70 dan Chery Tiggo Cross adalah pilihan utama di pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga dan perjalanan harian. Jika anda mengutamakan kredit jenama dan harga jualan semula, anda boleh mempertimbangkan yang lebih berkredit; jika anda mengutamakan nilai harga-kelengkapan dan kelengkapan, pilih yang mempunyai kelengkapan lebih lengkap. Akhir sekali, kami mencadangkan anda uji memandu kedua-duanya kerana pengalaman sendiri adalah yang paling penting.
Secara keseluruhan, Proton X70 dan Chery Tiggo Cross adalah model kereta yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana, yang utama adalah bergantung pada keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Kami cadangkan anda membuat kajian, membandingkan sebutan harga dari beberapa agensi, kemudian uji memandu untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, menghabiskan masa untuk membuat kajian pasti tidak akan salah.

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近嘅,今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較,幫你慳返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300,一共有 4 個版本,包括 1.5T Executive(RM 89,800)、1.5T Premium(RM 101,800)、1.5T Flagship(RM 113,300) 等。
Toyota Yaris Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 99,900 - 109,900,一共有 2 個版本,包括 2026 1.5L Standard(RM 99,900)、2026 HEV 1.5L Standard(RM 109,900) 等。
從價錢嚟睇,Proton X50 嘅入手價確實比 Toyota Yaris Cross 平咗 RM 10,100。如果你預算有限,Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意,平嗰幾千蚊,可能喺配備上會有取舍,具體要睇你嘅需要。

Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 TSS。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣,喺呢個級別裡面安全配備都算配得好齊。而家嘅新車安全性都幾唔錯,唔使太擔心呢一點。

Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm,行李廂 400 L。
Toyota Yaris Cross 車身長 4400 mm,行李廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣,車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車,日常使用完全夠用。

Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Toyota Yaris Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Toyota 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受,建議試駕比較。

總體嚟講,Proton X50 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛,關鍵係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事情,花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
The OTR price of Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of Chery Tiggo 8 in Malaysia is RM 129,750 - 129,750, with a total of 1 version, including 2026 1.6T Standard (RM 129,750), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 39,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 8. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, you should also note that the difference of a few thousand might involve compromises in features, depending on your specific needs.

Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cylinder, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 8 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of performance, Chery Tiggo 8's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cylinder. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power, you won't feel underpowered.

Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 8 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of the two cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. For this class of cars, it is fully sufficient for daily use.

Proton X50 adopts 4WD drive mode.
Chery Tiggo 8 adopts FWD drive mode.
Proton's 4WD and Chery's FWD will feel different in handling, test drive comparison is recommended.

Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 8 warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.

Overall, Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will definitely not be wrong.

在马来西亚的SUV市场,很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Mercedes-Benz Maybach GLS 和 Land Rover Range Rover 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的,今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比,帮你省下做功课的时间。
Mercedes-Benz Maybach GLS 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 1,918,888 - 1,918,888,一共有 1 个版本,包括 Standard(RM 1,918,888) 等。
Land Rover Range Rover 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 2,488,000 - 2,798,000,一共有 1 个版本,包括 Standard(RM 2,488,000) 等。
从价钱来看,Mercedes-Benz Maybach GLS 的起步价确实比 Land Rover Range Rover 便宜了 RM 569,112。如果你预算有限,Mercedes-Benz 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意,便宜的那几千块,可能在配备上会有取舍,具体要看你的需求。

Mercedes-Benz Maybach GLS 搭载 3.0L Turbo,马力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
Land Rover Range Rover 搭载 3.0L Turbo,马力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
两款车用的是同一套动力系统,日常开起来的感受基本没有差别。油耗方面也差不多,不用太纠结这一点。

Mercedes-Benz Maybach GLS 车身长 4400 mm,后备箱 400 L。
Land Rover Range Rover 车身长 4400 mm,后备箱 400 L。
两款车的尺寸几乎一样,车内空间差别不大。这个级别的车,日常使用完全够用。

Mercedes-Benz Maybach GLS 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Land Rover Range Rover 采用 4WD 驱动方式。
Mercedes-Benz 的 FWD 和 Land Rover 的 4WD 在操控上会有不同感受,建议试驾对比。

Mercedes-Benz Maybach GLS 保修 3年/100,000km,保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
Land Rover Range Rover 保修 3年/100,000km,保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
两款车的保修条件一样,这方面不用纠结。实际保养成本还要看品牌的服务网络和零件价格,建议去车友群问问真实车主的经验。

总的来说,Mercedes-Benz Maybach GLS 和 Land Rover Range Rover 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆,关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课,多比较几间车行的报价,再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事,花点时间做功课绝对不会错。

Di pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli akan membandingkan Proton X50 dan Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV semasa memilih kereta. Kedua-dua model ini hampir sama dari segi harga dan kedudukan, hari ini kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Harga OTR Proton X50 di Malaysia ialah RM 89,800 - 113,300, terdapat 4 varian termasuk 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV di Malaysia ialah RM 159,750 - 159,750, terdapat 2 varian termasuk 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 130,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 145,000) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X50 memang lebih murah RM 69,950 berbanding Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV. Jika bajet anda terhad, varian permulaan Proton sudah cukup memenuhi keperluan harian. Tetapi perlu diingatkan juga, perbezaan harga beberapa ribu ringgit itu mungkin ada pengorbanan dari segi kelengkapan, ia bergantung pada keperluan anda.

Penilaian keselamatan Proton X50 ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Penilaian keselamatan Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV ialah TBD, sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk Basic.
Dari segi kelengkapan keselamatan, kedua-dua kereta mendapat penilaian yang baik. Namun ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) Proton X50 dan Basic Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV mempunyai perbezaan fungsi. Jika anda lebih mementingkan keselamatan aktif, anda boleh membandingkan senarai fungsi kedua-duanya dengan teliti.

Proton X50 panjang badan 4400 mm, bagasi 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV panjang badan 4400 mm, bagasi 400 L.
Saiz kedua-dua kereta hampir sama, perbezaan ruang dalaman tidak banyak. Untuk kereta kelas ini, penggunaan harian sudah memadai.

Proton X50 menggunakan sistem penggerak 4WD.
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV menggunakan sistem penggerak FWD.
4WD Proton dan FWD Chery akan memberikan pengalaman pengawalan yang berbeza, disarankan untuk membandingkan semasa ujian memandu.
Secara keseluruhannya, Proton X50 dan Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV adalah model kereta yang bagus di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih mana satu, ia bergantung pada keperluan peribadi dan bajet anda. Kami mencadangkan anda membuat kajian, membandingkan tawaran dari lebih banyak dealer, kemudian buat ujian memandu untuk keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa membuat kajian tidak akan salah.

On July 16, GAC Group held a grand event at its Trumpchi factory in Guangzhou — celebrating the rollout of the 30 millionth vehicle.
What does 30 million represent? In the history of the Chinese automotive industry, no more than one hand of automakers have reached this number. It took GAC 29 years from the rollout of the first Accord in 1997 to now.
But the interesting part of this event was not the number itself, but the state GAC presented.
The star rolling off the line was not a traditional fuel car, but a right-hand drive Trumpchi M8 PHEV. The recipient was not a domestic dealer representative, but a Thai car owner.
The identity and destination of this vehicle speak louder than the number 30 million.

Selling to Thailand
A detail at the venue was worth noting: Vehicles numbered 29,999,995 to 29,999,999 rolled off the line in sequence. They were GAC Honda P7, GAC Toyota bZ7, GAC Qijing GT7, GAC Aion N60, and GAC Hyper S600, all New Energy Vehicles.

This was not just a rollout ceremony; it was clearly GAC flexing its muscles. The joint venture sector, the independent sector, pure electric, plug-in hybrid, and right-hand drive vehicles, the entire New Energy vehicle matrix appeared collectively. GAC wants to say one thing: Regarding electrification, I am serious.

In the first half of this year, GAC Group sales reached 773,100 vehicles, a 2.35% year-on-year increase, with New Energy Vehicle sales growing by 68.8%. Overseas exports exceeded 120,000 vehicles, a significant 132% increase year-on-year.
The growth rate is impressive, but the base is still relatively small. In the current era of deep industry reshuffling, GAC needs to run faster.
Quality is the Bottom Line, What Cannot Be Lost
GAC Chairman Feng Xingya said a sentence at the event: “Quality is the bottom line GAC will never cede.” Listening to this sentence today, it is actually quite weighty.
In the past few years, the Chinese automotive industry engaged in fierce involution, competing on price, specs, and computing power. But some things are hard to compete on, such as the quality control system.

GAC's quality management system has its uniqueness: integrating Honda's Total Quality Management (TQM), Toyota's Production System (TPS), plus the pragmatic DNA in Lingnan culture. This system ensures that GAC's joint venture and independent brands have long been at the forefront of the industry in product reliability.
Data also supports this: The Star Spirit Safety Guard System covers nearly 2 million users, avoiding 6.28 million potential travel risks; the Magazine Battery has cumulatively equipped 1.5 million vehicles, with safe driving mileage exceeding 160 billion kilometers.
In today's era where the industry madly piles on specs and configurations, "no breakdowns" has become a scarce value.
After 30 Million, Where to Go?
Feng Xingya announced a policy at the event: Launching the "30 Million Vehicle Rollout · Renewal and Gratitude Season". GAC's six major brands — Honda, Toyota, Trumpchi, Aion, Hyper, Qijing — will launch their respective policies around new purchase, trade-in, and extra purchase.
This is an action on the service level. More worthy of attention is GAC's next technology roadmap.

In the powertrain field, GAC's "Star Source Power" will cover three technology roadmaps: extended-range, plug-in hybrid, and Super Twin Engine. The pilot production line for all-solid-state batteries has been completed, and the Quark Electric Drive motor has exceeded 99% maximum efficiency.
In the intelligent networking field, the Star Spirit architecture is connecting six systems: intelligent driving, cockpit, powertrain, chassis, body, and vehicle connectivity. The goal is "one brain for unified command". The partner list is also long — Huawei, CATL, Didi, Tencent, Alibaba.
As of now, GAC has cumulatively invested over 62 billion yuan in R&D, with a global R&D team exceeding 6,800 people.
This level of investment is considered quite substantial among traditional automakers.
In Conclusion
30 million units is a milestone, but for GAC it is more of a watershed.
In the past 29 years, GAC relied on joint ventures for foundation, quality for reputation, and supply chain advantages and manufacturing capabilities to walk to today step by step. But for the next 30 million units, relying on these alone is not enough.
New energy transformation cannot be slow, intelligentization cannot lag behind, and the overseas market must be conquered. This is the same test faced by all traditional automakers.
GAC's choice is: Quality cannot be lost, but technology cannot be slow, rhythm cannot be chaotic, and the global market cannot be abandoned.
It looks like an attack on all fronts, but the logic is actually simple — to catch up on necessary courses as soon as possible while holding the bottom line.
After 30 million, the real test has just begun.

7月16日,广汽集团3000万用户感恩盛典在广汽传祺工厂盛大启幕。伴随右舵版传祺M8PHEV缓缓驶下生产线,广汽正式达成累计整车产销3000万辆里程碑。这场汇聚政府领导、行业专家、海内外车主与研发工匠的盛会,不仅是广汽29年发展的重要节点,更是中国汽车产业高质量、全球化进阶的鲜活注脚。

跨越29年跑出“广汽速度”
1997年广汽在行业质疑声中起步,走出“小规模起步、滚动发展”特色路径,交出亮眼成长答卷:从0到1000万辆耗时20年,而第二个2000万辆仅用9年完成,独有的发展节奏被业内称作“广汽速度”。本次下线仪式打破单一车型下线惯例,全球多工厂实时连线,广汽本田P7、丰田铂智7、埃安N60、昊铂S600、启境GT7五款新能源车型依次完成第29999995至29999999台整车下线,最终右舵传祺M8PHEV作为第3000万辆重磅登场,面向海外市场的产品选择,直观彰显广汽全球化布局成果。

活动现场,广汽集团董事长冯兴亚将3000万辆纪念车钥匙交付泰国车主TonyJaa,这份跨越国界的交付,是全球3000万用户与品牌双向奔赴的温情缩影。数据印证市场认可:2026上半年广汽累计销量77.31万辆,同比增长2.35%;自主品牌销量34.60万辆,增幅35.69%;海外出口12.15万辆,同比暴涨132%,海外市场已然成为全新增长曲线。
以极致品质筑牢根基
“品质是广汽永不退让的底线”,冯兴亚在致辞中强调。29年来广汽融合本田TQM、丰田精益管理模式,搭建覆盖研发、试验、智造、售后全链路品质体系,用严苛标准承接3000万份用户托付。

整车验证层面,所有新车必须完成“两冬一夏”完整周期测试,历经吐鲁番高温、呼伦贝尔极寒、高海拔、沙尘盐雾等“五高一山一尘”极限环境考核,累计等效测试里程超1300万公里;全球领先整车风洞、国内首个低空综合试验场,全方位打磨能耗、静谧与智能驾驶性能。制造端,埃安全球首座新能源灯塔工厂以600余台工业机器人、AI视觉检测实现毫米级品控,数千个车身紧固点数据终身可追溯。

安全技术构筑坚实屏障:星灵安全守护体系八大系统双冗余设计,累计规避628万次潜在事故;弹匣电池装车150万辆,安全行驶超1600亿公里无大规模安全隐患。行业首创“三担责”服务承诺,针对三电自燃、电池衰减、智能泊车事故三大用户痛点全额兜底,把品质保障延伸至用车全生命周期。依托过硬实力,广汽先后斩获中国质量奖提名,多款车型常年领跑细分保值率榜单。
全域服务打通出行全场景
依托“番禺行动”深度变革,广汽完成从工程师思维向用户思维的彻底迭代,把用户需求放在产品开发、服务升级的核心位置。常态化举办“用户全开麦”线下沟通会,研发、产品负责人直面车主痛点,建立诉求闭环处理机制;同步搭建用户共创体系,邀请车主参与车型规划、测试迭代,让产品真正贴合大众需求。
服务网络持续下沉补位:截至6月全国认定600家县域综合服务中心,年内计划扩容至1000家;能源端打造“9纵10横”全国补能网络,覆盖213座城市、自营充电桩超2.7万根,核心城区直线一公里即可找到充电站;线上24小时“超级管家”5秒响应、2小时办结诉求,彻底解决用户售后、补能、维保各类焦虑。
三重购车礼遇回馈千万信赖
为致谢全球车主长久陪伴,7月16日至8月31日,广汽六大乘用车品牌同步启动“3000万辆焕新感恩季”,三重重磅福利全覆盖新购、置换、增购人群:

第一重新购狂欢,全系主力车型推出5000元至5万元不等购车补贴,多款车型享3年8万0息金融方案,燃油、混动、纯电、增程全部覆盖;
第二重置换加码,广汽老车主置换传祺、昊铂、启境车型可叠加专属亲情补贴;
第三重增购专属福利,家庭第二台车选购启境GT7可享定制权益,降低全家出行升级门槛。
锚定2030全球百万销量新目标
3000万产销里程碑,亦是广汽全球化发展的全新起点。依托“OneGAC2.0”战略,广汽实现从产品出口到研产供销服全价值链出海转型,业务覆盖亚太、中东、欧美五大板块110个国家,建成7座海外工厂、746家销售网点。泰国市场6月销量环比大涨207%,欧洲本地化产销体系稳步落地,多款全球车型适配44种语言、满足欧七严苛标准。
面向长远,广汽定下2030全球化蓝图:业务拓展至120个国家,海外网点突破2000家,年海外销量100万辆。技术研发持续加码,累计自主投入超620亿元,专利申请超2.49万件,星源动力、星灵4.0架构、华为联合打造启境智驾等核心技术持续落地,以自主创新支撑全球化征程。

坚守长期主义,让用户永不将就
从合资起步到自主崛起,从国内深耕到全球布局,广汽历经四次跨越式发展,3000万用户数字背后,是千万普通人与品牌共同成长的温暖故事:七旬飞度车主自驾万里、M8车友奔赴灾区救援、海外车主跨越山海选择广汽……无数真实用车瞬间,让冰冷产销数字沉淀为有温度的品牌资产。

站上新起点,广汽表示将继续坚守长期主义,以品质为根、以用户为本、以创新为翼,持续打磨全域产品与服务,深耕国内市场、加速全球布局,奔赴下一个3000万的全新征程,为全球用户提供更安心、智能、多元的出行解决方案。

7 月 16 日,廣汽集團 3000 萬用戶感恩盛典於廣汽傳祺工廠盛大啟幕。廣東省、廣州市、番禺區相關領導,中國汽車工業協會常務副會長兼秘書長付炳鋒,廣汽集團董事長馮興亞、總經理閤先慶等一眾領導班子成員,攜手行業合作伙伴、供應商、經銷商代表,以及來自海內外的車主代表、員工代表與媒體代表齊聚一堂,共同見證廣汽集團邁入第 3000 萬位用戶這一具有里程碑意義的重要時刻。

【與會嘉賓見證廣汽迎來 3000 萬用戶里程碑時刻】
自首台整車正式下線,至第 3000 萬輛順利交付,廣汽走過了 29 載砥礪征程。3000 萬這一沉甸甸的數字,承載著千萬用戶的信賴與託付,彰顯著廣汽始終如一堅守品質與安全的執著信念,凝聚著邁向電動化、智能化轉型的堅定魄力,更成為中國汽車工業由規模增長邁向價值攀升、從體量壯大邁向實力躍升的生動註腳。
全球同步 智能新能源矩陣彰顯轉型進程
在活動現場,廣汽分佈於全球的多座生產基地實現同步聯動,廣汽本田 P7、廣汽豐田鉑智 7、啟境 GT7、廣汽埃安 N60、廣汽昊鉑 S600,依序作為廣汽第 29999995 至第 29999999 輛車,逐一完成下線流程。最終,右舵版廣汽傳祺 M8 PHEV 以第 3000 萬輛整車的身份,在舞臺之上燦爛亮相。全線新能源下線車型矩陣的集中呈現,生動詮釋了廣汽正全力加速電動化與智能化的轉型步伐。

【廣汽第 3000 萬輛整車——右舵版廣汽傳祺 M8 PHEV 駛下生產線】

【廣汽智能新能源矩陣閃亮登場】
緊接著,馮興亞鄭重地把第 3000 萬輛汽車的鑰匙,遞至泰國車主 Tony Jaa 先生掌心。這一瞬間所銘刻的,遠非單純的數字意義,而是廣汽與全球用戶彼此攜手、雙向奔赴的暖心印記。

【馮興亞(左)為泰國車主 Tony Jaa(右)交付新車鑰匙】

【閤先慶(左一)為廣汽集團全品牌榮譽車主頒獎】
這份跨越山海、沉甸甸的信任,無疑成為廣汽於行業風雲變幻中破局前行的堅實底氣。今年上半年,廣汽集團交出亮眼答卷,整體銷量達 77.31 萬輛,較去年同期實現 2.35% 的穩健增長,新能源汽車板塊更是勢頭迅猛,銷量同比勁增 68.8%;與此同時,海外出口成績斐然,一舉突破 12 萬輛大關,同比增幅高達 132%,在行業深度重構的關鍵階段,穩穩踏準發展步伐。
品質為基 築牢千萬用戶出行底氣
“品質,是廣汽堅守不移、絕不妥協的核心底線。”馮興亞於總結致辭中鄭重強調。在廣汽的成長進程中,規模擴張始終以品質為根基。經歷多年沉澱,廣汽集團始終將“質量至上”奉為圭臬,深度整合本田全面質量管理(TQM)、豐田精益生產方式(TPS)與嶺南文化精髓,匠心打造了以“融合創新”為核心的質量管控體系。所有努力的終極指向,皆在於打造令用戶駕駛安心、使用便捷、乘坐愜意的優質座駕。

【廣汽發展歷程重要節點見證者講述廣汽與品質同行的故事】

【“國家卓越工程師團隊”廣汽動力總成自主研發團隊講述研發創新歷程】

【廣汽造型設計團隊講述設計創新歷程】

【廣汽埃安智能生態工廠】
在研發與製造的全流程佈局中,廣汽精心構建起一套覆蓋全鏈條、標準嚴苛的品質管控體系:每一款新車在正式推向市場前,都要經歷高寒、高溫、高原、高濕、高腐、山區、沙塵等“五高一山一塵”的嚴苛極端環境考驗,並圓滿完成“兩冬一夏”的實地路試任務;依托試驗場與實驗室,對整車開展涵蓋 12 個大項、1500 餘項驗證子項的全面檢測,達成體系化的品質校驗目標;廣汽埃安智能生態工廠榮膺“全球首個新能源汽車燈塔工廠”,憑藉數字化智能製造體系,為量產品質的穩定築牢堅實根基。

【廣汽星靈安全守護體系】
於核心安全技術範疇,星靈安全守護體系搭建起四大防護壁壘,八大核心系統均運用雙冗餘架構,迄今已為近 200 萬用戶築牢安全屏障,成功化解 628 萬次潛在出行隱患;彈匣電池的裝車規模已突破 150 萬輛,安全行駛總里程跨越 1600 億公里大關;在服務保障層面,廣汽勇立行業潮頭,率先推出自主品牌“三擔責”舉措,針對用戶關切的電池及智能駕駛輔助難題主動擔責兜底,徹底消除用戶用車的後顧之憂。正是這層層築牢的安全屏障與樁樁踐行的服務承諾,鑄就了廣汽 3000 萬銷量背後堅不可摧的品牌自信。
用戶導向 構建全週期暖心服務體系
用戶所關注的,我們銘記於心;用戶所期許的,我們傾力踐行。”馮興亞指出,這種以用戶為核心的價值追求,已然鐫刻進廣汽集團的發展脈絡。長久以來,廣汽集團始終堅守“以人為本、信為道、創為先”的經營哲學,而“以人為本”的精髓,正是將用戶置於首位。

【廣汽“用戶全開麥”活動現場】
一方面,為精準聚焦問題、深度聆聽用戶訴求,廣汽持續推進用戶全開麥活動,誠摯邀請用戶走進企業,開展零距離的面對面溝通。與此同時,搭建起覆蓋全流程的閉環管理體系,保障每一條用戶建議均能高效落實,針對共性問題,迅速完成面向全體用戶的優化升級。
與此同時,廣汽專門組建了用戶洞察專屬部門,全力推動問題從精準發現到高效解決的全鏈條革新,憑藉科學的組織機制,切實確保每一項用戶訴求都能得到及時回應,每一件事情都能落地落實。
與此同時,服務網絡的滲透步伐也在全面提速。聚焦渠道佈局,加速服務網絡向縣域深度拓展,年內規劃新增 1000 家縣域授權門店;著眼服務響應,重磅推出“超級管家”服務,達成 5 秒極速響應、2 小時高效辦結訴求的目標,確保用戶訴求得以快速直達、妥善解決。立足補能體系,全力構建"9 縱 10 橫”補能網絡,現已覆蓋全國 31 個省份、213 座城市,核心城區達成“直線 1 公里必有站點”的佈局,自營充電樁規模超 2.7 萬根,其中超充樁數量突破 2 萬根,為新能源車主打造便捷無憂的補能體驗。

【廣汽能源"9 縱 10 橫”補能網絡】
此次感恩活動的核心要義,在於對 3000 萬用戶長久以來的鼎力支持,表達最深切的回饋與感恩之情。活動進行中,馮興亞鄭重宣告,自此刻起,廣汽全面開啟“廣汽集團 3000 萬輛下線·煥新感恩季”活動。廣汽本田、廣汽豐田、廣汽傳祺、廣汽埃安、廣汽昊鉑以及啟境汽車這六大乘用車品牌,將針對新購、置換、增購等多元購車場景,分別量身定製特色政策,以切實行動回饋每一份不離不棄的陪伴與支持。

【廣汽集團 3000 萬輛下線·煥新感恩季正式啟動】
科技向心 讓前沿技術賦能真實出行
立足 3000 萬這一全新座標,廣汽將秉持創新引領的理念,全力奔赴電動化與智能化的嶄新賽道,推動前沿科技切實落地,為用戶呈上觸手可及的安心體驗與便捷享受。
於動力技術前沿,“國家卓越工程師團隊”傾力打造的星源動力,精準涵蓋星源增程、星源插混及星源超級雙擎三大核心技術,即將賦能更多車型實現量產落地。每項產品均歷經 10 萬小時台架與整車嚴苛測試,等效行駛里程突破 1000 萬公里大關,保障在各類場景、全域地域環境中,性能表現始終堅如磐石。

【廣汽星源動力讓用戶選擇“不再就計”】
聚焦“三電”核心賽道,廣汽始終錨定電池超快充、低溫續航等關鍵難題全力突破,成功搭建全固態電池中試生產線,落地極致能耗創新成果,其量產的夸克電驅電機,最高效率強勢躍升至 99%,穩居行業頂尖水準。
在智能網聯的前沿陣地,超級大腦星靈架構正不斷迭代升級,成功串聯起智能駕駛輔助、智能座艙、動力、底盤、車身以及車聯網這六大核心系統,達成“單一大腦統籌全局”的高效運作,整體性能躍升 40%;星河智艙達成端雲深度融合,賦予車輛真正“善思考、通人性”的特質,化身貼心出行夥伴。廣汽亦將攜手華為、寧德時代、滴滴、騰訊、阿里等一眾行業翹楚,合力構築更為強勁的 AI 智能生態體系。
截至當下,廣汽集團在研發領域的投入累計已突破 620 億元,匯聚的全球研發精英規模超 6800 人。源源不斷的技術深耕,正助力廣汽旗下產品實現質的飛躍,從基礎代步工具,逐步升級為智能出行的貼心夥伴、移動的智慧生活空間,以及綠色能源的生態典範。
著眼未來征程,廣汽將始終緊扣用戶需求這一關鍵導向,築牢品質根基,憑藉科技創新凝聚核心動能,依托全球化佈局鋪就前行之路,全力推動向生態型科技廣汽的跨越升級,攜手廣大用戶並肩奮進、相互賦能,一同邁向更為智能、更具綠色特質、更為遼闊的嶄新未來。

Dalam pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli semasa memilih kereta akan membandingkan Perodua Aruz dan GWM Haval H6. Kedua-dua kereta ini memiliki harga dan posisi pasaran yang agak hampir, hari ini kita akan membandingkan dengan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek, membolehkan anda menjimatkan masa untuk persediaan.
Perodua Aruz mempunyai harga OTR di Malaysia sebanyak RM 72,900 - 77,900, terdapat 2 versi, termasuk 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900) dan lain-lain.
GWM Haval H6 mempunyai harga OTR di Malaysia sebanyak RM 139,750 - 139,750, terdapat 2 versi, termasuk 1.5L Turbo Standard (RM 140,000), 1.5L Turbo Premium (RM 155,000) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Perodua Aruz memang lebih murah RM 66,850 berbanding GWM Haval H6. Jika bajet anda terhad, model入门 Perodua sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Tetapi mesti berhati-hati, beberapa ribu ringgit yang murah itu, mungkin ada kompromi dari segi kelengkapan, bergantung pada keperluan anda.

Penilaian keselamatan Perodua Aruz ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk.
Penilaian keselamatan GWM Haval H6 ialah TBD, sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk Basic.

Perodua Aruz panjang kenderaan 4400 mm, kapasiti bagasi 400 L.
GWM Haval H6 panjang kenderaan 4400 mm, kapasiti bagasi 400 L.
Saiz kedua-dua kereta hampir sama, perbezaan ruang dalaman tidak ketara. Kereta pada tahap ini, sepenuhnya mencukupi untuk kegunaan harian.

Perodua Aruz dan GWM Haval H6 sama-sama merupakan pilihan utama pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga, perjalanan harian. Jika anda lebih mengutamakan nama baik jenama dan harga jualan semula, boleh utamakan yang mempunyai nama baik lebih baik; jika anda lebih mengutamakan nilai terhadap harga dan kelengkapan, maka pilih yang mempunyai spesifikasi lebih lengkap. Pada akhirnya disarankan untuk kedua-duanya uji jalan, pengalaman sendiri adalah yang paling penting.
Secara keseluruhannya, Perodua Aruz dan GWM Haval H6 sama-sama model kereta yang sangat bagus di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih kereta mana, kuncinya bergantung pada keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Disarankan kepada para pembeli membuat penyelidikan dengan teliti, bandingkan tawaran harga daripada beberapa dealer kereta, kemudian uji jalan untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, menghabiskan masa untuk penyelidikan tidak akan salah.


上海2026年7月8日 /美通社/ -- 由励展博览集团主办的上海国际铜工业展览会在上海新国际博览中心正式拉开帷幕。本届展会与第二十一届中国国际铝工业展、亚洲汽车轻量化展、上海国际镁工业展、上海国际再生金属展同期同地举办,五大专业展会形成产业协同矩阵,全面覆盖有色金属材料研发、加工制造、终端应用、循环再生全产业链条。开展首日,展会共吸引海内外专业观众20,248人到场,产业集聚与平台辐射效应持续释放。海外观众成绩单依旧亮眼,开展首日共有来自100+个国家和地区海外观众注册展会,主要国家包含:泰国、印度、马来西亚、土耳其等国家的专业观众莅临。
全产业链企业集中亮相 产业平台能级持续跃升
本届上海国际铜工业展览会同期五大展会合计吸引逾680+家优质参展企业入驻,总展览面积达60000平方米,产业覆盖广度与专业纵深同步拓展。展会首日,铜工业上下游各环节核心企业悉数登场,展示先进铜基材料,全面覆盖新能源汽车、电力电子、通信、储能等铜材主流应用领域,同时紧扣产业融合发展趋势,重点布局低空经济、人形机器人等新兴应用赛道,集中呈现铜材料在电气传导、结构轻量化及高效热管理场景中的核心技术价值与市场增长潜力。
其中,核心材料板块集结全行业中坚力量,中国铜业、海亮股份、金田铜业、江西铜业、铜陵有色、北铜新材料、楚江新材、力博实业、众源新材料、宁波兴业、金川集团、凯安新材料、晋西春雷铜业、五星铜业、亨通集团、华东电力、江西新越、江西嘉润、富威科技等头部企业悉数参展,展品涵盖全系列基础铜材及适配高端制造场景的高性能铜基材料,形成覆盖通用供给与定制需求的完整产品体系。
智能加工装备板块聚焦生产全流程升级,中国重型机械研究院股份公司、常州艾柯轧辊有限公司、大连康丰科技股份有限公司、江苏兴荣高新科技股份有限公司、无锡市锡山变压器电炉厂、赛克(苏州)工业炉制造有限公司、菲尔斯集团、英国博腾电子产品有限公司、浙江金默智能科技有限公司、江苏嘉轩智能工业科技股份有限公司等专业装备企业同台展出,带来覆盖铜冶炼、轧制、拉拔、精密加工、表面处理、质量检测等核心工序的智能化、数字化、绿色化装备解决方案,全方位匹配铜加工企业技术改造、产能扩容与能效提升的实际需求。配套耗材与服务板块则补齐产业生态链条,浙江驰马电力科技、佛山华高研磨、北京霍兰德贸易等企业携铜铝复合材料、研磨耗材、环保烟气处理设备及配套技术方案参展,为铜加工企业提供全周期配套支撑,助力企业优化运营成本,稳步推进绿色低碳转型。
铜基新材料高端应用论坛启幕 多维研判行业发展趋势
伴随产业升级与技术融合进程的加快,获取前瞻信息、链接创新资源已成为把握发展主动权的关键。作为本届展会的核心行业趋势洞察活动,2026 铜基新材料高端应用论坛于开幕当日同步举办。论坛紧扣行业热点与产业需求,聚焦铜加工新产品、新技术、新工艺与新应用方向,邀请行业协会、科研院所、龙头企业的专家代表开展主题分享,为参会企业解读政策动态、研判市场趋势、拆解技术路径。
本次论坛设五大核心议题,覆盖产业发展核心赛道:国际铜业协会北京代表处首席代表梁栋以 "双碳驱动:电动机绕组铜材料发展趋势" 为题,分析能效提升要求下电机绕组铜材料的技术演进方向与应用场景变化;保定天威线材制造有限公司党委书记、董事、总经理焦隽,分享"超薄绝缘高性能电磁线的研制";中国化学与物理电源行业协会监事会监事、动力电池应用分会秘书处、电池中国网 CEO 张雨作 "锂电产业发展及其对铜箔需求趋势研析" 主题分享,结合动力电池产业发展现状,梳理铜箔市场的需求规模、产品标准与技术升级路径;艾伯纳工业炉(太仓)有限公司高级销售经理陈林分享 "铜和铜合金的热处理解决方案",从加工工艺维度介绍铜材热处理的技术优化方案与实践经验;长三角先进材料研究院业务总监李华清围绕 "铜基材料三大增长极:AI 算力・新能源・半导体" 展开解读,剖析三大新兴产业赛道为铜基材料带来的市场空间与技术攻关重点;国际铜业协会数据中心方向项目经理雷杰欣以 "数据中心用铜产品及相关技术发展趋势" 为主题,探讨算力基础设施建设中铜材料的应用价值与技术发展方向。
精准商务配对落地 推动产业链供需高效协同
作为展会对接功能的核心落地环节,精准商务配对服务依托本届展会全产业链行业资源,聚焦铜产业供需对接的实际痛点,搭建高效的合作桥梁。该服务前置开展供需信息征集与梳理工作,精准锚定铜行业的明确采购需求,定向邀请多家符合采购标准的供应商提前锁定对接意向,为现场高效沟通做好前置筹备。
展会现场,组织采购方技术、质量、采购等相关代表与供应商开展面对面的洽谈,有效降低企业观展的沟通成本、提升对接效率,同时助力供需双方围绕具体诉求展开深度磋商,实现精准匹配。五展同步开展首日商务配对环节成绩亮眼,当日共开展598场次精准商务洽谈,实现供需双方高效对接,为产业链持续深化合作铺就坚实通路。
本届展会将持续至7月10日,后续还有多场产业交流与精准对接活动陆续上线,更多精彩,值得期待。

How many connectors a car needs is not the most important issue in the connection industry.
Electrical architecture centralization, wire harness lightweighting, and wireless communication will reduce some traditional connections. However, electrification, intelligent driving, and high-voltage platforms are raising requirements for power, bandwidth, and reliability. The number of connectors is changing, but for connector companies, more attention is paid to the connection location, materials, and implementation methods.
During the 2026 Munich Shanghai Electronic Show, TE Connectivity (TE) set the press conference theme as "Expanding Boundaries Together, Co-creating Value". Zheng Rong, Senior Sales and Marketing Director of TE Automotive Division in China, stated that TE is extending capabilities from connectors to conductors, wire harnesses, and system connections, and migrating automotive business experience to commercial vehicles, two-wheeled vehicles, and humanoid robots.

The key of this strategy is to allow TE to enter customers' product definition and system design links earlier. Determining earlier how materials are selected, how wire harnesses are manufactured, whether connection loops can be simplified, and how products are delivered overseas. This also means systematic solutions are entering the capability scope of a connector enterprise.
01.
Comprehensive "Aluminum Replacing Copper", Behind It is a System Engineering
One of the key points released by TE this time is to sign strategic cooperation agreements with Boway Advanced Alloy, Jiaocheng Ultrasonic, and Komax, to promote comprehensive "Aluminum Replacing Copper" in automobiles. The four parties cover materials, ultrasonic welding, production equipment, and connection solutions, hoping to connect the mass production chain from conductors to whole vehicle applications.

Sun Xiaoguang, Vice President and General Manager of TE Automotive Division and Industrial & Commercial Transportation Division in China, believes that aluminum replacing copper first has the significance of copper resource supply security, followed by cost and lightweighting value.
Automotive wire harnesses consume large amounts of copper materials. Electrification and intelligence continue to increase high-voltage circuits, sensors, and actuators, while AI data centers and grid construction are also competing for copper resources. Aluminum conductors possess density and price advantages, can reduce wire harness weight, and reduce the impact of copper price fluctuations on vehicle costs.
Sun Xiaoguang emphasized that copper and aluminum costs cannot be directly compared by price per ton of material. A more reasonable calculation method is to compare how much material each of the two solutions requires when transmitting the same current over the same distance, as well as the corresponding processing, connection, and verification costs.

This step pulls "Aluminum Replacing Copper" back from a purely cost issue to a practical engineering problem. Aluminum's electrical conductivity is lower than copper's, and equivalent current-carrying capacity may require a larger cross-sectional area. However, whether the whole vehicle can reduce weight and cost must be considered together with materials, wire diameter, terminals, and manufacturing processes. In other words, the true value of "Aluminum Replacing Copper" is reflected at the system level, rather than a simple material comparison.
But this does not mean aluminum wires can be directly installed on vehicles.
Sun Xiaoguang listed the main risks facing aluminum conductors, including creep, insufficient mechanical strength, crimping fracture, and electrochemical corrosion.
More importantly, the probability of some defects occurring is low, and it is also difficult to detect them in time on the production line. Once connection problems are scattered to multiple locations on the whole vehicle wire harness, after-sales maintenance will be very difficult.
Automotive wire harnesses are not easily replaceable standard modules. Wires run through the body and multiple electronic systems; local failures may manifest as intermittent open circuits, signal drift, or abnormal temperature rise. Troubleshooting costs are often higher than the parts themselves.
TE therefore emphasizes "High-end Aluminum Alloy Conductors" and requires redesigning terminals, crimping, sealing, and testing specifications. Material companies need to solve conductor performance, equipment companies need to solve welding and automation, connector companies are responsible for terminals and interfaces, wire harness plants and vehicle manufacturers complete manufacturing and verification.
A single enterprise cannot independently complete this technical route. After material performance improves, wire harness plants may still refuse to adopt due to excessively high equipment investment; after equipment costs decrease, lack of testing standards will increase quality risks. Whether "Aluminum Replacing Copper" can be mass-produced depends on whether the entire link is established simultaneously.
This well explains why the speed of "Aluminum Replacing Copper" entering vehicles looks not very fast.
Sun Xiaoguang worries that if insufficiently verified aluminum wires enter the market quickly, once mass quality problems appear, consumers may equate "Aluminum Replacing Copper" directly with cutting corners.
This risk has exceeded single enterprises. Low-quality products may squeeze standardized solutions with short-term cost advantages, ultimately damaging the reputation of the entire technical route.
TE hopes to establish a closed loop of materials, processes, equipment, and testing through four-party cooperation, and then promote vehicle mounting.
Sun Xiaoguang summarized this approach as "Slow Down", first clarifying technical boundaries and quality standards.
It can be seen that for the automotive industry, the value of "Aluminum Replacing Copper" does not lie in replacing copper with cheaper materials, but in establishing a new connection system that can be continuously mass-produced, used for a long time, and bear safety responsibilities.
02.
"Lighthouse Plan", Let Customers Enter the Front End of Product Definition
TE also released the "Lighthouse Plan".
Sun Xiaoguang clarified that TE does not view itself as the lighthouse. Customers provide requirements, pain points, and directions; TE is responsible for organizing technical and industrial resources to jointly overcome industry problems.
This mechanism changes the traditional supply relationship. In the past, vehicle manufacturers complete system definition, then specify requirements to component suppliers. The Lighthouse Plan advances cooperation to the problem identification and solution incubation stages, allowing customers to participate in material, structure, and process selection.
Current "Lighthouse Plan" disclosed founding projects include 0.19 hybrid composite wire, next-generation low-voltage aluminum alloy wire, flat wire, and new high-voltage contactors.

0.19 composite wire originates from customer demand for wire harness weight reduction and cost reduction.
But after the wire diameter shrinks, traditional assembly methods are difficult to guarantee efficiency and reliability; TE needs to consider conductors, terminals, and automated assembly synchronously.
This type of project reflects the coupling characteristics of connection technology. Wire thinning affects mechanical strength and crimping window; terminal shrinking changes machining precision; finally, it must adapt to the wire harness plant's manufacturing rhythm.
And flat wire targets wire harness automation, freeing up human labor.
Traditional automotive wire harnesses still contain a large amount of manual assembly, and changes in vehicle configurations lead to complex wire harness varieties, invisibly increasing labor burden. And flat wires can improve automation rate, reducing manufacturing fluctuations and quality risks while reducing labor costs.
Additionally, high-voltage contactors re-enter the Chinese market.
TE once introduced high-voltage contactors from the industrial and aviation fields into the Chinese automotive market, but did not fully adapt to domestic customers' requirements for price and rapid volume growth.
This time releasing an open high-voltage contactor solution, cancelling the traditional ceramic sealing structure, hoping to reduce costs and production energy consumption, while meeting high-voltage system requirements.
This is also an example of TE expanding capability boundaries. The company is no longer limited to passive connection components, but enters the high-voltage circuit control and protection links.
TE has established a joint innovation laboratory with Geely, and signed a strategic cooperation agreement with Li Auto. Zheng Rong stated that more customers also wish to participate in the Lighthouse Plan.
Whether the Lighthouse Plan can form a barrier depends on whether joint development results can transcend single projects and transform into platform products with scale effects. Customer lists and cooperation agreements can only prove willingness; mass production and reuse determine value.
03.
Auto Plus, Migrate Automotive Capabilities to New Markets
TE summarizes commercial vehicles, two-wheeled vehicles, and embodied intelligence as "Auto Plus".
The scale, cycle, and technical requirements of the three markets vary greatly. TE chooses to enter these fields, relying on the scale manufacturing, reliability verification, and supply chain capabilities accumulated in automotive business.
Commercial vehicles are not a simple copy of passenger cars.
Sun Xiaoguang believes that commercial vehicle connector projects have a longer investment recovery cycle, but product lifecycles can reach 20 to 30 years. Passenger car projects have faster returns, and replacement cycles are shorter.
Commercial vehicle usage intensity is significantly higher than passenger cars. Some vehicles may charge 6 to 10 times a day, posing different requirements for the lifespan, weather resistance, and reliability of charging connectors.
TE is developing 0.3 hybrid wire suitable for commercial vehicles, and exploring commercial vehicle aluminum replacing copper solutions. Commercial vehicle wire diameters are usually larger, and copper material usage per unit circuit is also higher.
Passenger car solutions can provide a technical basis, but cannot be directly copied. Commercial vehicles need to be redesigned for waterproofing, vibration resistance, charging frequency, and long-term supply.
The difference of two-wheeled vehicles lies in different cost structures.
TE focuses on two-wheeled vehicle ABS, cameras, electrification, and assisted driving connection requirements. Mid-to-high-end two-wheeled vehicles are adding safety and intelligent functions.
Zheng Rong stated that TE recently made progress in the two-wheeled vehicle market, with some customers actively seeking cooperation.
Two-wheeled vehicle connection requirements are similar to cars, but product prices, sizes, and environmental requirements differ. TE needs to compress automotive-grade reliability into lower cost and smaller size solutions.

Humanoid robots need to wait for commercialization to arrive.
TE believes that humanoid robots and cars both require perception, control, power, battery, and connection systems. Cameras, LiDAR, millimeter-wave radars, controllers, and high-frequency connection technologies have migration space.
Robot joints also require long-term bending wire-to-wire connections, and power systems involve batteries, charging, and battery swapping.
Sun Xiaoguang also admitted that humanoid robots have not yet entered the large-scale explosion stage; TE "still has no market voice" in segmented fields such as dexterous hands and joints.

The significance of Auto Plus lies in TE's attempt to expand the application radius of automotive capabilities and find new growth points outside of automobiles.
04.
How Chinese Innovation Connects Global Markets
Sun Xiaoguang divides localization into several levels: production, supply chain, R&D, talent, and decision-making authorization.
TE stated that over the past three consecutive years, more than 60% of the company's global invention patents come from the Chinese team. The Chinese management team also obtained local authorization for new factories, R&D projects, and market decisions.
This reflects TE's new positioning; China has shifted from a manufacturing base to a global R&D and decision node.
The synergy of TE China + Global also provides more assistance for Chinese customers going overseas.
TE can not only meet the product requirements of Chinese customers, but its manufacturing capabilities in regions such as Europe, Morocco, Brazil, and Thailand can also provide localization support for Chinese vehicle manufacturers and Tier 1s in local production, supply chain, regulations, and employment environments.
For TE, the Chinese market provides rapid iteration, complete supply chain, and large-scale applications; overseas networks provide local manufacturing, customer coverage, and compliance capabilities. Only after combining both can Chinese R&D results have the opportunity to become global products.
Conclusion
Comprehensive "Aluminum Replacing Copper" provides a technical sample, the Lighthouse Plan establishes a joint development mechanism, Auto Plus expands the application scope of automotive capabilities, and Chinese R&D with global manufacturing networks are responsible for pushing solutions to more markets. These four main lines jointly point to TE's upgrade, from supplying connectors to participating in material, process, system, and supply chain design.
This path is not easy. Aluminum replacing copper requires long-term verification, Lighthouse projects need to form scale mass production, two-wheeled vehicles and robotics businesses still need to establish product boundaries, and Chinese innovation also needs to be adopted by global customers.
Connectors are still TE's basic foundation, but capabilities beyond connectors are enabling TE to inject greater value into the automotive industry.

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺選車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近,今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比,幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300,一共有 4 個版本,包括 1.5T Executive(RM 89,800)、1.5T Premium(RM 101,800)、1.5T Flagship(RM 113,300) 等。
Chery Tiggo Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 88,750 - 99,750,一共有 2 個版本,包括 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH(RM 99,750)、2025 1.5T Standard(RM 88,750) 等。
由價錢睇,Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅起步價比 Proton X50 平咗 RM 1,050。老實講,喺呢個價位段,幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大,關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。

Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl,馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo Cross 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl,馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
兩款車用緊同一套動力系統,日常開起嚟嘅感受基本無咩分別。油耗方面都差唔多,唔使太糾結呢一點。

Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm,後備箱 400 L。
Chery Tiggo Cross 車身長 4400 mm,後備箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣,車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車,日常使用完全夠用。

Proton X50 保修 5 年/150,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo Cross 保修 3 年/100,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

總體嚟講,Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 都係馬來西亞市場好好嘅車型。揀邊架車,關鍵仲係睇你個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅轎車市場,好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿福斯 Golf 同 凌志 ES 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近,今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較,幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
福斯 Golf 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 186,530 - 186,530,一共有 1 個版本,包括 2026 1.5T R-Line(RM 186,530) 等。
凌志 ES 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 320,888 - 371,888,一共有 4 個版本,包括 2025 250 F Sport(RM 371,888)、2025 250 Luxury(RM 356,888)、2025 250 Premium(RM 320,888) 等。
由價錢睇落嚟,福斯 Golf 嘅入門價確實比 凌志 ES 平咗 RM 134,358。如果你預算有限,福斯嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意,平嗰幾千蚊,可能喺配備上會有取舍,具體要睇你嘅需求。

福斯 Golf 配備 2.0L 4-cyl,馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
凌志 ES 配備 2.0L Turbo,馬力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
動力方面,凌志 ES 嘅 2.0L Turbo 比 福斯 Golf 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 多咗 50 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開,兩款車嘅動力都夠用,唔會覺得唔夠力。

福斯 Golf 車身長 4400 mm,行李廂 400 L。
凌志 ES 車身長 4400 mm,行李廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣,車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車,日常使用完全夠用。

福斯 Golf 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
凌志 ES 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣,都係 FWD,日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。

福斯 Golf 保用 3 年/100,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
凌志 ES 保用 3 年/100,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保用條件一樣,呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格,建議去車友群問下真正車主嘅經驗。

總體嚟講,福斯 Golf 同 凌志 ES 都係馬來西亞市場好好嘅車型。揀邊輛,關鍵始終要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再去做試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

在马来西亚的汽车市场,很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Subaru Forester 和 BMW X3 来做比较。今天我们从多个方面做一个详细的对比,帮你省下做功课的时间。


Subaru Forester 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 174,000 - 197,000,一共有 3 个版本,包括 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition(RM 189,538)、2024 2.0L S EyeSight(RM 177,538)、2024 2.0L L EyeSight(RM 167,538) 等。
BMW X3 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 325,800 - 358,800,一共有 2 个版本,包括 xDrive20i(RM 320,000)、xDrive30e(RM 360,000) 等。
从价钱来看,Subaru Forester 的起步价确实比 BMW X3 便宜了 RM 151,800。如果你预算有限,Subaru 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意,便宜的那几千块,可能在配备上会有取舍,具体要看你的需求。

Subaru Forester 的安全评级是 5★ (Euro NCAP),主动安全系统包括 EyeSight。
BMW X3 的安全评级是 5★ (Euro NCAP),主动安全系统包括 Premium ADAS。
两款车的安全评级一样,在这个级别里面安全配备都算给得很齐全了。现在的新车安全性都不差,不用太担心这一点。

Subaru Forester 车身长 4400 mm,后备箱 400 L。
BMW X3 车身长 4400 mm,后备箱 400 L。
两款车的尺寸几乎一样,车内空间差别不大。这个级别的车,日常使用完全够用。

Subaru Forester 和 BMW X3 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择,适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价,可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款;如果你更在意性价比和配备,那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾,亲身体验才是最重要的。

总的来说,Subaru Forester 和 BMW X3 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆,关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课,多比较几间车行的报价,再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事,花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
