HomeGardenMY
Search History
Popular Searches
Dealer Login / Sign Up
Di pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli membandingkan Proton X70 dan Mitsubishi Xforce semasa memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kereta ini agak hampir dari segi harga dan posisi, hari ini kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Proton X70 di Malaysia mempunyai harga OTR sebanyak RM 106,800 - 122,300, terdapat 3 varian, termasuk 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300) dan lain-lain.
Mitsubishi Xforce di Malaysia mempunyai harga OTR sebanyak RM 109,930 - 119,930, terdapat 2 varian, termasuk 2026 1.5L Ultimate (RM 119,930), 2026 1.5L Urban (RM 109,930) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X70 memang RM 3,130 lebih murah berbanding Mitsubishi Xforce. Jika anda mempunyai bajet terhad, varian pengenalan Proton sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Tetapi perlu diingat, beribu-ribu ringgit yang lebih murah itu mungkin ada kompromi dari segi kelengkapan, bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Penarafan keselamatan Proton X70 ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Penarafan keselamatan Mitsubishi Xforce ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk MI-PILOT.
Penarafan keselamatan kedua-dua kereta adalah sama, dalam kelas ini kelengkapan keselamatan dianggap cukup lengkap. Keselamatan kereta baru sekarang tidak kurang, tidak perlu terlalu risau tentang perkara ini.
Proton X70 menggunakan cara pemanduan FWD.
Mitsubishi Xforce menggunakan cara pemanduan FWD.
Cara pemanduan kedua-dua kereta adalah sama, semuanya FWD, perasaan memandu harian tidak akan banyak berbeza.
Proton X70 jaminan 5 tahun/150,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Mitsubishi Xforce jaminan 3 tahun/100,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Secara keseluruhannya, Proton X70 dan Mitsubishi Xforce adalah model yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana satu, penting utamanya bergantung pada keperluan peribadi dan bajet anda. Kami cadangkan anda membuat kajian, bandingkan beberapa kedai kereta, kemudian buat ujian pandu untuk keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa membuat kajian tidak akan salah.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Ativa and Mitsubishi Xforce when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, let's make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Ativa's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 62,500 - 73,400, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400), etc.
Mitsubishi Xforce's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 109,930 - 119,930, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Ultimate (RM 119,930), 2026 1.5L Urban (RM 109,930), etc.
Looking at the price, Perodua Ativa's starting price is indeed RM 47,430 cheaper than Mitsubishi Xforce. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note, the difference of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Ativa's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA.
Mitsubishi Xforce's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes MI-PILOT.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive for this class. New cars nowadays have good safety, so no need to worry too much about this.
Perodua Ativa body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mitsubishi Xforce body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, and interior space differences are not significant. For this class of cars, it is more than enough for daily use.
Perodua Ativa warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mitsubishi Xforce warranty 3 years/100,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Perodua Ativa and Mitsubishi Xforce are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is most important.
Overall, Perodua Ativa and Mitsubishi Xforce are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several dealers, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會揾 Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嚟做比較。佢哋兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，而家我哋就從多個方面嚟做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 123,750 - 123,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 125,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 140,000） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 平咗 RM 33,950。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體就要睇你嘅需要。
Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠勁。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Chery 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同嘅感覺，建議試駕比較。
Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要睇你個人嘅需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
Written by Han Zihan Edited | Qingzhu
A Prime Minister, plus three cabinet ministers, standing behind an investment by a Chinese automaker. Amid the EU adding layer upon layer of measures to Chinese electric vehicles, it itself conveys a signal.
On July 23, at the Geely Valencia factory, in the presence of Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Geely Automobile and Ford signed a joint venture agreement to create new energy vehicles for Geely and Ford brands for the European market through capacity sharing.
Not buying a factory, but a joint venture; not defeating others, but win-win cooperation.
Whether bringing in or going out, Geely's internationalization has always implemented Chairman Li Shufu's words: "Business is beautiful, doing business and making friends at the same time".
Time rewind to 16 years ago. On March 28, 2010, Geely Holding Group signed the final 100% equity acquisition agreement for Volvo Cars Group with Ford Motor Company. Geely became the first multinational corporation in the Chinese automotive industry. Ford witnessed and supported this cooperation case with global automotive industry influence, forging commercial friendship with Geely.
Today, 16 years later, Geely and Ford shake hands again. For the current explosive growth of Chinese cars going overseas, this has strong implications.
2026, the overseas expansion of China's automotive industry is undergoing a key leap from quantitative change to qualitative change.
In the first half of the year, China's vehicle export volume reached 5.096 million, up 65.3% year-on-year. June's single-month exports broke the 1 million vehicle threshold for the first time. For every 10 vehicles produced domestically, nearly 4 head to overseas docks.
Consulting firm AlixPartners predicts that China's annual vehicle export volume is expected to reach 10 million, becoming the first country globally to break this number.
Behind the numbers, deeper changes are occurring.
In June, the market share of major Chinese brands in Europe was 13%, surpassing Japanese brands for two consecutive months. When we occupy a larger share of the EU market, we cannot just sell cars simply, we must achieve harmonious win-win with the local industrial ecosystem, laws and regulations, and social well-being.
The joint venture between Geely Automobile and Ford to establish a company in Spain happens to stand at this node of qualitative change. It is also another practice of Li Shufu from "going out" to "integrating in".
A Prime Minister's Endorsement, and Two Handshakes Spanning 16 Years
On July 23, the day of the signing ceremony. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez appeared at the Almussafes factory in Valencia, followed by three ministers from the Ministry of Labor and Economy, Ministry of Industry and Tourism, and Ministry of Science, as well as the President of the Valencian Community.
The Almussafes factory was built in 1976, and was once Ford's largest production base outside the United States, with cumulative production of over 11 million vehicles to date. For nearly 50 years, this factory has been the livelihood for tens of thousands of families in the Valencia region of Spain.
But the industrial era never stops for sentiment. Starting from 2024, with the promotion of EU industry and electrification, Ford gradually ceased production of multiple fuel models such as Mondeo, S-MAX, Galaxy, leaving only one production line producing the Kuga in the huge factory.
Last year, the factory with an annual capacity of 500,000 vehicles actually produced less than 100,000 vehicles, with utilization rate less than one-quarter. The factory that once fed thousands of Spanish families is facing a crossroads of fate.
Geely's arrival could not have been more timely. Through capacity sharing, it not only brings jobs, capacity, and tax revenue to the locality, but also allows Ford to activate remaining assets in a more efficient way, continuing to generate value.
According to the plan, the joint venture company will officially commence operations in the first half of 2027.
In the new factory, Geely will launch two new energy vehicle models, and Ford will also produce three multi-energy vehicle models, including continuing to produce the Kuga, and launching an all-new rugged compact SUV of the Bronco family in 2028.
The five models will share capacity and coordinate production scheduling. Both sides stated in the announcement that the joint venture will "promote more model choices and value enhancement", and through "integrating output to reduce per-vehicle costs". For the local economy, jobs are preserved, and an industrial lifeline of a region is reactivated, which can be called a win-win on multiple fronts.
Currently, Spain is becoming a strategic pivot for Chinese automakers landing in Europe. Labor costs are about one-third of Germany's, energy costs are lower than Germany and France, possessing world-class port clusters, and Barcelona is the core gateway for Chinese cars entering Europe.
In Q1 2026, Chinese brands sold approximately 38,700 vehicles in Spain, up 67% year-on-year.
Jian Jiayue, CEO of Geely Automobile Group, said a passage: Automakers going overseas will face many issues, from the overseas perspective, Chinese brands are there to "conquer" other people's markets, so the "going out" of Chinese automotive brands is actually to "walk in". Walking into the local market. Building factories in joint venture locally, mobilizing local resources, is a path of multi-win.
For Geely, although it seems like taking a small loss, cannot enjoy profits exclusively. But it actually avoided many hidden costs and efficiency frictions.
The EU has always been a high threshold market, with high compliance costs, high environmental protection requirements, long approval processes, influence of local voter opinions and political factions, which will make business behavior complicated. Specific cases can refer to the drama-like twists and turns of Tesla's German factory.
Actually, now there are already domestic automakers who suffered the same loss. Fighting alone, one-sidedly emphasizing ambition and sales targets, instead resulted in much hostility and obstruction, even becoming a chip in local political party games.
But the other path Geely took, preserving jobs in overseas markets, activating assets for old car companies, taking root for Chinese brands locally, letting technology flow become a constructive force, by "win-win cooperation, beauty shared" making oneself a welcomed partner.
Seeking Strategic Depth, Prioritizing Synergy
Citi estimates that if Geely obtains the 150,000 vehicle annual production quota in the Valencia factory, the cost is only equivalent to 10%-20% of building a new greenfield factory.
Beyond cost advantage, the more critical value lies in time. From signing to production, the joint venture model requires only 18 months, while self-built factories usually take three to five years. In the rapidly changing European electric vehicle market, an 18-month time difference is enough to determine whether a brand can lock in position.
Geely has already validated this strategy in many markets globally.
In Malaysia, in 2017, Geely acquired 49.9% stake in Proton and fully dominated operations. Let Proton walk out of the quagmire of losses, achieving brand revitalization.
In January 2026, Proton's exclusive EV factory at Tanjung Malim Automotive High-Tech Valley officially started production, and the first pure electric model eMas7 started CKD local assembly. The eMas7 is built on the Geely Galaxy E5 platform, ranking champion in Malaysia EV sales for consecutive months.
Until today, from Malaysia's political circles to the public, they still regard Proton as "their own brand". What Geely does is not replacing, but making it better.
In Korea, Geely cooperated with Renault to launch intelligent hybrid models. In Brazil, Geely acquired 26.4% stake in Renault Brazil, sharing factory capacity and market network.
In Europe, Volvo Cars is fully responsible for Lynk & Co's commercial and brand operations in the European region, assisting Lynk & Co brand's regional expansion in Europe.
This is exactly Geely's unique logic of global layout — not advancing alone, but weaving an ecological synergy network. Every cooperation node is both a strategic pivot to enter local markets, and proof of long-term trust from partners. Making globalization a value network of multi-win cooperation and continuous deepening.
So, although "from product exports to system exports" has become industry consensus, what exactly is the system? Moving your own system forcefully there, or building a system from scratch, or integrating into the local system? These operational details reflect a company's business values and development outlook.
Geely's Spain joint venture and the logic behind this system provide a good sample and idea for the Chinese automotive industry, and reflect as substantial growth data.
In the first half of 2026, Geely's overseas sales reached 474,000, up 158% year-on-year, already exceeding the total export volume of the full year 2025. Based on the first half performance, Geely has upped the full year export target to 900,000 vehicles.
Conclusion: From "Student" to "Partner", the Metamorphosis and Responsibility of Chinese Automakers
In early 2010, Geely and Ford signed an agreement in Gothenburg, Sweden, to acquire the globally renowned Swedish luxury brand Volvo for 1.8 billion US dollars, and the media used "snake swallowing an elephant" to describe this transaction.
Geely fulfilled all commitments with action, did not intervene in Volvo's independent operations, protected and respected its existing development systems, letting Volvo achieve brand revitalization in the following decade plus.
More importantly, Geely also learned Volvo's systematic R&D capabilities, safety-first manufacturing standards and quality control. This transaction allowed Geely to complete an "advanced study", laying the capability foundation for active performance on the global stage later.
Traditional automakers hold existing capacity, channels, and sales teams, while Chinese automakers hold the advantages and cost efficiency of the fastest growing new energy system, both sides found what both parties need in this stage.
As Ford Europe President Jim Baumback said: "Geely's world-class electrification capabilities, speed, and massive global scale, combined with Ford, are unparalleled competitive advantages."
From the humble "student" in 2010 to the equal "partner" in 2026, Geely exchanged pragmatism for trust, won respect with capability, and integrated into global industry development in the best way.
Geely's globalization has never been a simple capital game, but constantly exploring open and win-win global industry cooperation models under the premise of legality and compliance, it is respect for brands and technology, layout and deep construction of synergy systems.
From Volvo to Proton, Lotus, then Mercedes-Benz, Renault, and Ford, Geely's built global system synergy not only activated new momentum for Geely's global development, but also formed a solid guarantee to help brand going overseas. This also confirms what Li Shufu said, "Business is the most equal and beautiful manifestation of human civilization."
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿梅賽德斯 - 奔馳 GLS 同路虎 Range Rover Sport 來做比較。今日我哋從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
梅賽德斯 - 奔馳 GLS 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 1,020,888 - 1,020,888，一共有 1 個版本，包括 Standard（RM 1,020,888） 等。
路虎 Range Rover Sport 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 1,698,000 - 2,500,000，一共有 1 個版本，包括 Standard（RM 1,698,000） 等。
從價錢睇來，梅賽德斯 - 奔馳 GLS 嘅起頭價確實比路虎 Range Rover Sport 平咗 RM 677,112。如果你預算有限，梅賽德斯 - 奔馳嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需要。
梅賽德斯 - 奔馳 GLS 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
路虎 Range Rover Sport 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過梅賽德斯 - 奔馳 GLS 嘅 Premium ADAS 同路虎 Range Rover Sport 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有少少分別，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
梅賽德斯 - 奔馳 GLS 保養 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
路虎 Range Rover Sport 保養 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保養條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問下真實車主嘅經驗。
梅賽德斯 - 奔馳 GLS 同路虎 Range Rover Sport 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更加重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更加在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總括嚟講，梅賽德斯 - 奔馳 GLS 同路虎 Range Rover Sport 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
在马来西亚的汽车市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Mazda CX-80 和 Chery Tiggo 9 来做比较。今天我们从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Mazda CX-80 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 296,610 - 296,610，一共有 1 个版本，包括 2025 2.5L 65km High Plus（RM 296,610） 等。
Chery Tiggo 9 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 166,800 - 179,800，一共有 1 个版本，包括 2026 2.0T Standard（RM 179,750） 等。
从价钱来看，Chery Tiggo 9 的起步价比 Mazda CX-80 便宜了 RM 129,810。老实讲，在这个价位段，几千块的差距其实不算大，关键还是看整体的性价比和长期使用成本。
Mazda CX-80 车身长 4500 mm，后备箱 450 L。
Chery Tiggo 9 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
空间方面，Mazda CX-80 的车身比 Chery Tiggo 9 长了 100 mm，车内乘坐空间会稍微宽裕一些，尤其是后座腿部空间。如果你经常载家人或者需要放婴儿车，大一点的车身确实更实用。
Mazda CX-80 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Chery Tiggo 9 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
两款车的驱动方式一样，都是 FWD，日常驾驶感受不会有太大区别。
Mazda CX-80 和 Chery Tiggo 9 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择，适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价，可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款；如果你更在意性价比和配备，那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾，亲身体验才是最重要的。
总的来说，Mazda CX-80 和 Chery Tiggo 9 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
在马来西亚的SUV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Toyota Harrier 和 Volkswagen Tiguan 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Toyota Harrier 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 289,000 - 289,000，一共有 1 个版本，包括 2026 HEV 2.5L Standard（RM 289,000） 等。
Volkswagen Tiguan 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 206,540 - 260,024，一共有 2 个版本，包括 2025 Allspace 2.0T R-Line（RM 260,024）、2025 Allspace 1.4T Elegance（RM 206,540） 等。
从价钱来看，Volkswagen Tiguan 的起步价比 Toyota Harrier 便宜了 RM 82,460。老实讲，在这个价位段，几千块的差距其实不算大，关键还是看整体的性价比和长期使用成本。
Toyota Harrier 的安全评级是 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Brand ADAS。
Volkswagen Tiguan 的安全评级是 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 IQ.Drive。
安全配备方面，两款车都拿到了不错的评级。不过 Toyota Harrier 的 Brand ADAS 和 Volkswagen Tiguan 的 IQ.Drive 在功能上有些差异，如果你比较看重主动安全的话，可以仔细对比一下两者的功能列表。
Toyota Harrier 保修 5年/无限制里程，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
Volkswagen Tiguan 保修 3年/100,000km，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
Toyota Harrier 和 Volkswagen Tiguan 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择，适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价，可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款；如果你更在意性价比和配备，那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾，亲身体验才是最重要的。
总的来说，Toyota Harrier 和 Volkswagen Tiguan 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
© 2024 Bitauto.com. All Rights Reserved.
Bitauto (www.yiche.com and www.bitauto.com) is one of the most visited automotive websites in China. We provide detailed info on Chinese car brands available in your area. Please note that the information provided on this website is based on publicly available data and is for reference only. It may not be fully updated or accurate at all times.
Help us improve our website
