喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿寶騰 X90 同馬自達 CX-30 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近,今日我哋就從多個方面嚟做一個詳細嘅比較,幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800,一共有 4 個版本,包括 2026 1.5T Prime X(RM 122,800)、2026 1.5T Prime(RM 116,800)、2026 1.5T Lite(RM 106,800) 等。
馬自達 CX-30 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 122,409 - 146,409,一共有 4 個版本,包括 2025 2.0L High+ Premium(RM 146,409)、2025 2.0L High+(RM 138,409)、2025 2.0L High(RM 130,409) 等。
由價錢睇開,寶騰 X90 嘅起步價確實比馬自達 CX-30 平咗 RM 15,609。如果你預算有限,寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意,平嗰幾千蚊,可能喺配備上有取舍,具體要睇你嘅需求。

寶騰 X90 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
馬自達 CX-30 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣,都係 FWD,日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。

寶騰 X90 保修 5 年/150,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
馬自達 CX-30 保修 5 年/150,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣,呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格,建議去車友群問下真實車主嘅經驗。

寶騰 X90 同馬自達 CX-30 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇,適合家庭用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價,可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款;如果你更在意性價比同配備,就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後始終建議兩款都去試駕,親身體驗先至係最重要。

總嘅嚟講,寶騰 X90 同馬自達 CX-30 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛,關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

Dalam pasaran SUV Malaysia, ramai pembeli membandingkan Proton X70 dan GWM Haval H6 apabila memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kereta ini agak hampir dari segi harga dan kedudukan, hari ini kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek, membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Harga OTR Proton X70 di Malaysia ialah RM 106,800 - 122,300, terdapat 3 versi, termasuk 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR GWM Haval H6 di Malaysia ialah RM 139,750 - 139,750, terdapat 2 versi, termasuk 1.5L Turbo Standard (RM 140,000), 1.5L Turbo Premium (RM 155,000) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X70 memang lebih murah RM 32,950 berbanding GWM Haval H6. Jika bajet anda terbatas, versi permulaan Proton sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Tetapi perlu diingat, perbezaan beberapa ribu yang lebih murah ini mungkin ada pertukaran dari segi kelengkapan, bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Penilaian keselamatan Proton X70 adalah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Penilaian keselamatan GWM Haval H6 adalah TBD, sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk Basic.
Dari segi kelengkapan keselamatan, kedua-dua kereta telah mendapat penilaian yang baik. Namun, ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) pada Proton X70 dan Basic pada GWM Haval H6 mempunyai beberapa perbezaan dari segi fungsi, jika anda lebih mementingkan keselamatan aktif, anda boleh membandingkan senarai fungsi kedua-duanya dengan teliti.
Proton X70 panjang 4400 mm, kapasiti bagasi 400 L.
GWM Haval H6 panjang 4400 mm, kapasiti bagasi 400 L.
Ukuran kedua-dua kereta itu hampir sama, ruang dalam kenderaan tiada banyak beza. Kereta tahap ini, untuk penggunaan harian adalah cukup sepenuhnya.
Proton X70 jaminan 5 tahun/150,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
GWM Haval H6 jaminan 7 tahun/150,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Proton X70 dan GWM Haval H6 adalah pilihan utama pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga, perjalanan harian. Jika anda lebih mementingkan reputasi jenama dan harga jualan semula, pertimbangkan yang mempunyai reputasi lebih baik dahulu; jika anda lebih prihatin dengan nilai dan kelengkapan, maka pilihlah yang mempunyai konfigurasi lebih lengkap. Pada akhirnya, disarankan untuk memandu ujian kedua-dua model, pengalaman sendiri adalah yang paling penting.
Secara keseluruhan, Proton X70 dan GWM Haval H6 adalah model kereta yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana, kuncinya bergantung pada keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Disarankan membuat kajian terlebih dahulu, membandingkan beberapa penawaran daripada agensi kereta yang berbeza, kemudian uji jalan untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, mengambil masa untuk membuat kajian tidak akan salah.
Dalam pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli membandingkan Proton X70 dan Chery Tiggo 9 semasa memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kereta ini mempunyai harga dan kedudukan pasaran yang hampir sama, hari ini kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa melakukan penyelidikan.
Proton X70 dijual di Malaysia dengan harga OTR RM 106,800 - 122,300, terdapat 3 varian, termasuk 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300) dan lain-lain.
Chery Tiggo 9 dijual di Malaysia dengan harga OTR RM 166,800 - 179,800, terdapat 1 varian, termasuk 2026 2.0T Standard (RM 179,750) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X70 memang lebih murah RM 60,000 daripada Chery Tiggo 9. Jika bajet anda terhad, varian permulaan Proton sudah memadai untuk keperluan harian. Namun, perlu diingat bahawa jumlah yang lebih murah itu mungkin melibatkan kompromi dalam kelengkapan, bergantung pada keperluan anda.

Penarafan keselamatan Proton X70 ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Penarafan keselamatan Chery Tiggo 9 ialah TBD, sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk Basic.
Dari segi kelengkapan keselamatan, kedua-dua kereta mendapat penarafan yang baik. Namun, ADAS Proton X70 (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) dan Basic Chery Tiggo 9 mempunyai perbezaan dari segi fungsi. Jika anda mengutamakan keselamatan aktif, anda boleh membandingkan senarai fungsi kedua-duanya dengan teliti.

Panjang badan Proton X70 4400 mm, ruang beg barang 400 L.
Panjang badan Chery Tiggo 9 4400 mm, ruang beg barang 400 L.
Saiz kedua-dua kereta hampir sama, ruang dalam kabin tidak banyak berbeza. Untuk kereta kelas ini, ia sudah cukup untuk penggunaan harian.

Proton X70 menggunakan cara pemacu FWD.
Chery Tiggo 9 menggunakan cara pemacu FWD.
Cara pemacu kedua-dua kereta sama, iaitu FWD, tidak akan ada perbezaan besar dalam pengalaman memandu harian.
Secara keseluruhan, Proton X70 dan Chery Tiggo 9 adalah model kereta yang sangat bagus di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih mana satu, ia bergantung pada keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Disyorkan agar anda melakukan penyelidikan terlebih dahulu, bandingkan kutipan harga beberapa kedai kereta, dan lakukan ujian memandu untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa untuk membuat penyelidikan tidak akan salah.

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拎 Perodua Aruz 同 Mazda CX-3 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近,今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比,幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900,一共有 2 個版本,包括 1.5L X(RM 72,900)、1.5L AV(RM 77,900) 等。
Mazda CX-3 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 126,159 - 139,159,一共有 2 個版本,包括 2023 2.0L High(RM 139,159)、2023 2.0L Plus(RM 126,159) 等。
從價錢來看,Perodua Aruz 嘅起價確實比 Mazda CX-3 平咗 RM 53,259。如果你預算有限,Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意,平少少嘅幾千蚊,可能喺配備上會有取舍,具體要看你嘅需求。

Perodua Aruz 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 。
Mazda CX-3 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣,喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算俾得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差,唔使太擔心這一點。

Perodua Aruz 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mazda CX-3 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣,都係 FWD,日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。

Perodua Aruz 保養 5 年/150,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-3 保養 5 年/150,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保養條件一樣,呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要看品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格,建議去車友群問問真實車主嘅經驗。

總體嚟講,Perodua Aruz 同 Mazda CX-3 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛,關鍵仲要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

According to Gasgoo Automotive Research Institute data, from Jan-May 2026, exports of Chinese passenger cars and new energy passenger cars continued to show high growth, but regional differentiation intensified further. Regarding passenger car exports, Brazil continued to hold the top spot, with Russia following closely, the two countries accounting for more than 40% of the total in the top ten; the European market performed steadily, achieving high growth; while the Latin America and Middle East markets entered a period of deep adjustment.
New energy passenger car exports performed even more strongly. Brazil led by a large margin, Belgium jumped to second place, highlighting its status as a European transit hub; the European market occupied five seats in the top ten. Among them, Italy and Germany achieved explosive breakthroughs with growth rates of 365.3% and 211.2% respectively, showing that Chinese new energy vehicles have successfully penetrated the heartland of traditional automotive powerhouse countries; additionally, Australia ranked fourth on the list and South Korea eighth, fully demonstrating the core competitiveness and diversified layout capabilities of Chinese new energy vehicles in both traditional automotive powerhouse countries and emerging markets.
TOP 10 Export Destination Countries for Chinese Passenger Cars (Jan-May 2026)
No. 1 Brazil, Jan-May 2026, exported 372,199 passenger cars to Brazil, cumulative year-on-year growth of 178.7%.
No. 2 Russia, Jan-May 2026, exported 350,641 passenger cars to Russia, cumulative year-on-year growth of 139.8%.
No. 3 United Kingdom, Jan-May 2026, exported 188,935 passenger cars to the UK, cumulative year-on-year growth of 82.0%.
No. 4 Australia, Jan-May 2026, exported 158,230 passenger cars to Australia, cumulative year-on-year growth of 59.2%.
No. 5 Belgium, Jan-May 2026, exported 156,364 passenger cars to Belgium, cumulative year-on-year growth of 26.6%.
No. 6 Italy, Jan-May 2026, exported 123,214 passenger cars to Italy, cumulative year-on-year growth of 140.7%.
No. 7 United Arab Emirates, Jan-May 2026, exported 119,179 passenger cars to UAE, cumulative year-on-year decline of 32.6%.
No. 8 Mexico, Jan-May 2026, exported 113,642 passenger cars to Mexico, cumulative year-on-year decline of 40.0%.
No. 9 Spain, Jan-May 2026, exported 94,452 passenger cars to Spain, cumulative year-on-year growth of 56.0%.
No. 10 Malaysia, Jan-May 2026, exported 78,599 passenger cars to Malaysia, cumulative year-on-year growth of 26.9%.

From Jan-May 2026, the landscape of Chinese passenger car export destinations continued to evolve. Brazil maintained the top spot with 372,199 units and a 178.7% year-on-year growth, further consolidating its status as the No. 1 export market. Russia ranked second with 350,641 units and a 139.8% year-on-year growth, showing strong demand for Chinese vehicles.
In terms of regional distribution, the European market showed overall growth. The United Kingdom firmly ranked third with 188,935 units and 82.0% year-on-year growth. Belgium (156,364 units), Italy (123,214 units), and Spain (94,452 units) all achieved year-on-year growth, with Italy's growth reaching as high as 140.7%, reflecting the continuous breakthroughs of Chinese brands in new energy product import and channel construction in Europe. If Russia is included in the European regional consideration, the proportion of the European market in Chinese passenger car exports exceeds half, becoming the absolute core. However, the European market still faces uncertainties in policy environment, trade barriers, and local competition; future growth leans more towards structural opportunities.
The Latin American market showed obvious polarization. Brazil ranked at the top with over 370,000 units and 178.7% year-on-year growth, benefiting from early volume increase before tariff hikes in July. In contrast, Mexican exports declined by 40.0% year-on-year, related to tariff increases effective from Jan 2026, compounded by tightening North American trade policies and adjustments in market expectations, leading to significant demand contraction. This differentiation indicates that the performance of Chinese car companies in the Latin American region is influenced by tariff, trade policy cycles, and local market environments of each country, making operating fluctuations caused by country differences very prominent.
The Middle East market entered an adjustment phase. UAE (119,179 units) declined by 32.6% year-on-year, leaving behind the previous high-speed growth. Regarding the Asia-Pacific market, Australia (158,230 units) grew by 59.2% year-on-year, ranking fourth; Malaysia (78,599 units) grew by 26.9% year-on-year, ranking tenth, showing that the potential of Southeast Asian and Oceania markets is continuously being released. Overall, Chinese passenger car exports are transitioning from relying on a few hotspot markets to a new stage where multiple regions bear pressure together and the structure is becoming increasingly diverse; growth drivers are shifting from quantity expansion to a deeper contest of product strength and brand recognition.
TOP 10 Export Destination Countries for Chinese "New Energy" Passenger Cars (Jan-May 2026)
No. 1 Brazil, Jan-May 2026, exported 283,182 new energy passenger cars to Brazil, cumulative year-on-year growth of 175.6%.
No. 2 Belgium, Jan-May 2026, exported 150,110 new energy passenger cars to Belgium, cumulative year-on-year growth of 25.8%.
No. 3 United Kingdom, Jan-May 2026, exported 129,807 new energy passenger cars to the UK, cumulative year-on-year growth of 81.4%.
No. 4 Australia, Jan-May 2026, exported 111,406 new energy passenger cars to Australia, cumulative year-on-year growth of 168.2%.
No. 5 Italy, Jan-May 2026, exported 67,043 new energy passenger cars to Italy, cumulative year-on-year growth of 365.3%.
No. 6 Germany, Jan-May 2026, exported 65,235 new energy passenger cars to Germany, cumulative year-on-year growth of 211.2%.
No. 7 Thailand, Jan-May 2026, exported 62,316 new energy passenger cars to Thailand, cumulative year-on-year growth of 62.8%.
No. 8 South Korea, Jan-May 2026, exported 60,488 new energy passenger cars to South Korea, cumulative year-on-year growth of 170.3%.
No. 9 Spain, Jan-May 2026, exported 56,953 new energy passenger cars to Spain, cumulative year-on-year growth of 74.9%.
No. 10 United Arab Emirates, Jan-May 2026, exported 53,135 new energy passenger cars to UAE, cumulative year-on-year growth of 45.7%.

From Jan-May 2026, the landscape of Chinese new energy passenger car export destinations changed significantly. Brazil maintained the top spot with 283,182 units and a 175.6% year-on-year growth, further expanding its lead, with new energy becoming the absolute main force for Chinese car exports to Brazil. Belgium leaped to second place with 150,110 units and 25.8% year-on-year growth, highlighting its strategic value as a European new energy transit hub. The United Kingdom ranked third with 129,807 units and 81.4% year-on-year growth, followed closely by Australia with 111,406 units and a 168.2% surge year-on-year, showing that electrification demand in the Oceania market is accelerating.
In terms of regional distribution, the European market showed an overall explosive trend. Including Belgium and the UK, Italy (67,043 units) grew by 365.3% year-on-year, Germany (65,235 units) grew by 211.2% year-on-year, and Spain (56,953 units) grew by 74.9% year-on-year, with growth rates far exceeding the average. Among them, the amazing increases in Italy and Germany show that Chinese new energy vehicles have successfully penetrated the heartland of traditional automotive powerhouse countries, with product strength and brand recognition achieving substantial breakthroughs. However, the European market still faces policy uncertainties such as carbon tariffs and anti-subsidy investigations; future growth relies more on deep integration into local supply chains.
The Asian market is blossoming in multiple points. Thailand (62,316 units) grew by 62.8% year-on-year. As a stronghold of Southeast Asian EV industry, Chinese brands continue to deepen their efforts through localized production layouts. South Korea (60,488 units) grew by 170.3% year-on-year, entering the top ten for the first time, reflecting significantly improved competitiveness of Chinese new energy vehicles in East Asian neighboring countries. Regarding the Middle East market, UAE (53,135 units) grew by 45.7% year-on-year, with new energy becoming a new growth point in this region.
Overall, Chinese new energy passenger car exports have entered a new stage, with market coverage extending from emerging economies to traditional automotive powerhouse countries. Growth dynamics have shifted from price advantages to a deeper contest of technical strength and brand premium. In the future, how to maintain sustainable growth under the intensification of trade barriers and requirements for local production will be a common challenge facing Chinese new energy vehicle companies.

在马来西亚的轿车市场,很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Volkswagen Golf 和 Mercedes-Benz C-Class 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的,今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比,帮你省下做功课的时间。
Volkswagen Golf 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 186,530 - 186,530,一共有 1 个版本,包括 2026 1.5T R-Line(RM 186,530) 等。
Mercedes-Benz C-Class 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 292,888 - 296,888,一共有 2 个版本,包括 C 200 Avantgarde(RM 260,000)、C 300 AMG Line(RM 310,000) 等。
从价钱来看,Volkswagen Golf 的起步价确实比 Mercedes-Benz C-Class 便宜了 RM 106,358。如果你预算有限,Volkswagen 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意,便宜的那几千块,可能在配备上会有取舍,具体要看你的需求。

Volkswagen Golf 车身长 4400 mm,后备箱 400 L。
Mercedes-Benz C-Class 车身长 4400 mm,后备箱 400 L。
两款车的尺寸几乎一样,车内空间差别不大。这个级别的车,日常使用完全够用。

Volkswagen Golf 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Mercedes-Benz C-Class 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
两款车的驱动方式一样,都是 FWD,日常驾驶感受不会有太大区别。

Volkswagen Golf 和 Mercedes-Benz C-Class 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择,适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价,可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款;如果你更在意性价比和配备,那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾,亲身体验才是最重要的。

总的来说,Volkswagen Golf 和 Mercedes-Benz C-Class 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆,关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课,多比较几间车行的报价,再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事,花点时间做功课绝对不会错。

在马来西亚的SUV市场,很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 BMW X7 和 Land Rover Defender 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的,今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比,帮你省下做功课的时间。
BMW X7 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 635,800 - 694,800,一共有 3 个版本,包括 1.5L Standard 2WD(RM 106,800)、1.5L Executive 2WD(RM 115,800)、1.5L Premium 2WD(RM 122,300) 等。
Land Rover Defender 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 688,000 - 688,000,一共有 1 个版本,包括 Standard(RM 688,000) 等。
从价钱来看,BMW X7 的起步价确实比 Land Rover Defender 便宜了 RM 52,200。如果你预算有限,BMW 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意,便宜的那几千块,可能在配备上会有取舍,具体要看你的需求。

BMW X7 的安全评级是 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主动安全系统包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Land Rover Defender 的安全评级是 TBD,主动安全系统包括 Basic。
安全配备方面,两款车都拿到了不错的评级。不过 BMW X7 的 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 和 Land Rover Defender 的 Basic 在功能上有些差异,如果你比较看重主动安全的话,可以仔细对比一下两者的功能列表。

BMW X7 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Land Rover Defender 采用 4WD 驱动方式。
BMW 的 FWD 和 Land Rover 的 4WD 在操控上会有不同感受,建议试驾对比。

BMW X7 保修 5年/无限里程,保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
Land Rover Defender 保修 3年/100,000km,保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。

总的来说,BMW X7 和 Land Rover Defender 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆,关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课,多比较几间车行的报价,再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事,花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
