Homeblend
Search History
Popular Searches
Dealer Login / Sign Up
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會將 Proton X70 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,750 - 129,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 1.5T 90km CSH（RM 129,750）、Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 支援咩充電方法？可唔可以用家用電源插座充電？（RM 117,478） 等。
由價錢嚟睇，Proton X70 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 便宜咗 RM 22,950。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，便宜嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。
Proton X70 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，Proton X70 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Toyota Fortuner when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300) etc.
The OTR price of Toyota Fortuner in Malaysia is RM 195,880 - 241,880, with a total of 3 versions, including 2024 2.8T VRZ Diesel (RM 241,880), 2024 2.7L SRZ Petrol (RM 202,880), 2024 2.4L Standard Diesel (RM 195,880) etc.
From a price perspective, the entry price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 89,080 cheaper than Toyota Fortuner. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry version can already meet daily needs. But note, the few thousand Ringgit saved might involve trade-offs in equipment, which depends on your specific needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Toyota Fortuner is equipped with 2.5L Diesel, horsepower 187 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.5 L/100km.
In terms of power, Toyota Fortuner's 2.5L Diesel has 47 more horsepower than Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel underpowered.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Toyota Fortuner body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, with little difference in interior space. Cars of this level are more than enough for daily use.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive mode.
Toyota Fortuner adopts FWD drive mode.
The drive modes of both cars are the same, both FWD, there won't be much difference in daily driving experience.
Proton X70 and Toyota Fortuner are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and equipment, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X70 and Toyota Fortuner are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do research, compare quotes from several car dealerships, then go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will absolutely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家揀車嘅時候都會攞 Mazda CX-9 同 Volvo XC60 黎比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近嘅，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Mazda CX-9 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 328,810 - 345,810，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2023 2.5T 4WD（RM 345,810）、2023 2.5T 2WD（RM 328,810）等。
Volvo XC60 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 328,888 - 328,888，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2025 2.0T Core（RM 328,888）等。
由價錢睇落嚟，Mazda CX-9 嘅起步價真係比 Volvo XC60 平咗 RM 78。如果你預算有限，Mazda 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能會喺配備上有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Mazda CX-9 搭載 2.0L Turbo，馬力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
Volvo XC60 搭載 2.0L Turbo，馬力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
兩部車用緊同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感受基本冇咩分別。油耗方面都差不多，唔使太糾結呢一點。
Mazda CX-9 車身長 4500 mm，行李廂 450 L。
Volvo XC60 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-9 嘅車身比 Volvo XC60 長咗 100 mm，車內坐位空間會稍為寬鬆少少，尤其係後座腳位空間。如果你經常載家人或者需要放嬰兒車，大少少嘅車身真係更實用。
Mazda CX-9 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Volvo XC60 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩部車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有大分別。
總體嚟講，Mazda CX-9 同 Volvo XC60 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較間車行嘅報價，先去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
在马来西亚的皮卡市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Nissan Navara 和 Isuzu D-MAX 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Nissan Navara 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 98,600 - 154,800，一共有 5 个版本，包括 2025 Single Cab 2.5T MT（RM 98,600）、2025 Double Cab 2.5T AT Pro-4X（RM 154,800）、2025 Double Cab 2.5T AT VL（RM 146,900） 等。
Isuzu D-MAX 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 95,000 - 155,000，一共有 9 个版本，包括 2026 3.0T AT 4WD X-Terrain 5 Seats（RM 162,888）、2026 3.0T AT 4WD Premium 5 Seats（RM 145,088）、2026 2.2T AT 4WD Premium 5 Seats（RM 141,771） 等。
从价钱来看，Isuzu D-MAX 的起步价比 Nissan Navara 便宜了 RM 3,600。老实讲，在这个价位段，几千块的差距其实不算大，关键还是看整体的性价比和长期使用成本。
Nissan Navara 搭载 2.5L Diesel，马力 187 hp。官方油耗 8.5 L/100km。
Isuzu D-MAX 搭载 2.5L Diesel，马力 187 hp。官方油耗 8.5 L/100km。
两款车用的是同一套动力系统，日常开起来的感受基本没有差别。油耗方面也差不多，不用太纠结这一点。
Nissan Navara 的安全评级是 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Brand ADAS。
Isuzu D-MAX 的安全评级是 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 ADAS。
两款车的安全评级一样，在这个级别里面安全配备都算给得很齐全了。现在的新车安全性都不差，不用太担心这一点。
Nissan Navara 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
Isuzu D-MAX 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
两款车的尺寸几乎一样，车内空间差别不大。这个级别的车，日常使用完全够用。
Nissan Navara 保修 5年/150,000km，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
Isuzu D-MAX 保修 3年/100,000km，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
总的来说，Nissan Navara 和 Isuzu D-MAX 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
在马来西亚的轿车市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 BMW M4 和 Porsche 718 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
BMW M4 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 887,800 - 887,800，一共有 1 个版本，包括 Standard（RM 887,800） 等。
Porsche 718 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 545,000 - 1,700,000，一共有 6 个版本，包括 2025 AMG G 63（RM 1,948,888）、2025 Cayman 2.0T（RM 585,000）、2025 Boxster 2.0T（RM 545,000） 等。
从价钱来看，Porsche 718 的起步价比 BMW M4 便宜了 RM 342,800。老实讲，在这个价位段，几千块的差距其实不算大，关键还是看整体的性价比和长期使用成本。
BMW M4 的安全评级是 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Premium ADAS。
Porsche 718 的安全评级是 TBD，主动安全系统包括 Basic。
安全配备方面，两款车都拿到了不错的评级。不过 BMW M4 的 Premium ADAS 和 Porsche 718 的 Basic 在功能上有些差异，如果你比较看重主动安全的话，可以仔细对比一下两者的功能列表。
BMW M4 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Porsche 718 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
两款车的驱动方式一样，都是 FWD，日常驾驶感受不会有太大区别。
BMW M4 保修 5年/无限里程，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
Porsche 718 保修 3年/100,000km，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
总的来说，BMW M4 和 Porsche 718 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
在马来西亚的SUV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Toyota Harrier 和 Mercedes-Benz GLB 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Toyota Harrier 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 289,000 - 289,000，一共有 1 个版本，包括 2026 HEV 2.5L Standard（RM 289,000） 等。
Mercedes-Benz GLB 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 299,888 - 352,888，一共有 1 个版本，包括 Standard（RM 299,888） 等。
从价钱来看，Toyota Harrier 的起步价确实比 Mercedes-Benz GLB 便宜了 RM 10,888。如果你预算有限，Toyota 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意，便宜的那几千块，可能在配备上会有取舍，具体要看你的需求。
Toyota Harrier 的安全评级是 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Brand ADAS。
Mercedes-Benz GLB 的安全评级是 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Premium ADAS。
安全配备方面，两款车都拿到了不错的评级。不过 Toyota Harrier 的 Brand ADAS 和 Mercedes-Benz GLB 的 Premium ADAS 在功能上有些差异，如果你比较看重主动安全的话，可以仔细对比一下两者的功能列表。
Toyota Harrier 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
Mercedes-Benz GLB 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
两款车的尺寸几乎一样，车内空间差别不大。这个级别的车，日常使用完全够用。
Toyota Harrier 保修 5年/无限制里程，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
Mercedes-Benz GLB 保修 3年/100,000km，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
总的来说，Toyota Harrier 和 Mercedes-Benz GLB 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
On June 23, 2026, Wanli Tire Co., Ltd.'s IPO application for the Shenzhen Stock Exchange Main Board was officially accepted, with CITIC Haitong Securities as the sponsor. This largest radial tire enterprise in South China has officially entered the A-share review process, planning to raise 2 billion yuan, focusing on overseas base construction and intelligent capacity upgrade.
Steady Performance, Three-Year Revenue Exceeds 18.6 Billion
The prospectus shows that Wanli Tire has maintained steady growth in performance over the past three years. From 2023 to 2025, the company's operating revenue reached 5.588 billion yuan, 6.022 billion yuan, and 7.028 billion yuan respectively, with a compound annual growth rate of 12.14%; net profit attributable to owners was 398 million yuan, 417 million yuan, and 419 million yuan respectively, with profitability continuously strengthening.
As an enterprise actually controlled by the Guangzhou Municipal SASAC, Wanli Tire currently owns three major production bases in Conghua, Guangzhou; Hefei, Anhui; and Cambodia, producing 39.2 million radial tires annually. Among them, the Conghua base has built the largest single-plant semi-steel radial tire factory in the country. According to the 2025 Global Tire Top 75 list, Wanli Tire ranks 41st globally and 17th among Chinese mainland enterprises.
Focusing on the New Energy Track, Equipping 15 OEMs
In the new energy vehicle tire niche track, Wanli Tire possesses a first-mover advantage. According to certification by the China Rubber Industry Association, the company's new energy vehicle dedicated tire sales rank in the top three among domestic tire enterprises. Currently, the company has successfully equipped 15 OEMs including BYD, GAC, Dongfeng, Chery, and others, with cumulative sales exceeding 3 million units. For the GAC Aion N60 launched in April 2026, Wanli Tire was the only invited tire enterprise for exclusive equipping.
Raising 2 Billion for Factory Construction, Building a High-Resilience Global Supply Chain
For this IPO, Wanli Tire plans to raise 2 billion yuan, investing in five major projects, including the highly anticipated new Cambodia factory project, the Malaysia high-performance green rubber tire production base construction project, as well as the Conghua base Phase III expansion and R&D center upgrade project.
In recent years, the proportion of Wanli Tire's export revenue has consistently exceeded 50%. Through the implementation of this fundraising investment project, the company can not only expand and upgrade production equipment to achieve a leap in production capacity and R&D capabilities; on the other hand, it will accelerate the layout of overseas bases such as Cambodia and Malaysia, respond more efficiently to overseas customer needs, reduce logistics costs, and build a risk-resistant and high-resilience global supply chain system.
Starting from introducing US Firestone technology in 1988, to knocking on the door of the Shenzhen Stock Exchange today, Wanli Tire has completed a leapfrog from following technology to industry leadership in 38 years. This time, accelerating going global and new energy layout with the help of capital power will inject strong momentum into its journey towards the "10-billion tire" strategic goal.
© 2024 Bitauto.com. All Rights Reserved.
Bitauto (www.yiche.com and www.bitauto.com) is one of the most visited automotive websites in China. We provide detailed info on Chinese car brands available in your area. Please note that the information provided on this website is based on publicly available data and is for reference only. It may not be fully updated or accurate at all times.
Help us improve our website
