Homemethods
Search History
Popular Searches
Dealer Login / Sign Up
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Ativa and Chery Tiggo Cross when choosing a car. The price range and positioning of these two cars are quite close, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
The OTR price of Perodua Ativa in Malaysia is RM 62,500 - 73,400, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400), etc.
The OTR price of Chery Tiggo Cross in Malaysia is RM 88,750 - 99,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH (RM 99,750), 2025 1.5T Standard (RM 88,750), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Perodua Ativa is indeed RM 26,250 cheaper than Chery Tiggo Cross. If your budget is limited, the entry-level Perodua can already meet daily needs. However, be aware that the few thousand difference in price might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.
Perodua Ativa is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo Cross is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, and the driving feel in daily use is basically the same. Fuel consumption is also similar, so there is no need to worry too much about this point.
Perodua Ativa body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo Cross body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. For cars in this class, it is completely sufficient for daily use.
Perodua Ativa adopts FWD drive mode.
Chery Tiggo Cross adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, and there will not be much difference in daily driving feel.
Perodua Ativa and Chery Tiggo Cross are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is suggested to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Ativa and Chery Tiggo Cross are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several car dealerships, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Mazda CX-3 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Mazda CX-3 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 126,159 - 139,159, with a total of 2 versions, including 2023 2.0L High (RM 139,159), 2023 2.0L Plus (RM 126,159), etc.
From a price perspective, Perodua Aruz starting price is indeed RM 53,259 cheaper than Mazda CX-3. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand saved might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.
Mazda CX-3 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include i-Activsense.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive within this class. New car safety is generally not bad nowadays, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mazda CX-3 body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
Regarding space, Mazda CX-3 body is 100 mm longer than Perodua Aruz, offering better passenger space. However, Perodua Aruz is slightly more flexible for parking in the city, each has its trade-offs.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-3 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, no need to worry about this. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and parts prices, suggest asking real owners in car owner groups for experience.
Perodua Aruz and Mazda CX-3 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, we suggest test driving both, as hands-on experience is most important.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Mazda CX-3 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your homework, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Hyundai Tucson when choosing a car. These two vehicles are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The Hyundai Tucson OTR price in Malaysia is RM 143,888 - 197,888, with a total of 5 versions, including 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige (RM 197,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige (RM 186,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime (RM 164,888), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of the Proton X50 is indeed RM 54,088 cheaper than the Hyundai Tucson. If your budget is limited, the entry-level Proton can already meet daily needs. However, also note that the few thousand cheaper might mean compromises in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Hyundai Tucson safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include SmartSense.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New cars nowadays are not lacking in safety, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, boot 400 L.
Hyundai Tucson body length 4400 mm, boot 400 L.
Both cars are almost the same size, cabin space is not much different. Cars in this class are more than enough for daily use.
Proton X50 and Hyundai Tucson are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one that is better equipped. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and Hyundai Tucson are both quite good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time researching will never be wrong.
[CNMO Tech News] On July 9, Avatr Technology announced that Professor Konstantin Novoselov, 2010 Nobel Prize in Physics laureate and co-discoverer of graphene materials, officially became the 100,000th owner of Avatr 07 at the Avatr Singapore Showroom. Avatr Technology President Chen Zhuo attended the delivery ceremony and personally handed the new car keys to Professor Konstantin.
Avatr 07
According to CNMO Tech, Professor Konstantin Novoselov is an international top scholar in the field of condensed matter physics. In 2004, he and his mentor Professor Andre Geim successfully separated graphene composed of single-layer carbon atoms from graphite through the "Scotch tape method". This groundbreaking research laid the foundation for the field of two-dimensional materials. Both were awarded the 2010 Nobel Prize in Physics for this, with Novoselov being only 36 years old at the time. As one of the thinnest, strongest, and best conducting and heat-conducting materials currently known, graphene is considered a core basic material for future technology. Avatr Technology President Chen Zhuo stated at the delivery site that Professor Konstantin's choice is a high recognition of Avatr's full-link strength from technology to product, and also confirms that the attraction of Chinese intelligent electric vehicles in the global high-end market is continuously enhancing.
Avatr 07 is the main model of the Avatr brand and also the world's first mass-produced vehicle fully equipped with Huawei Qiankun Intelligent Driving ADS 4. In terms of core intelligent driving, Avatr 07 is equipped with the WEWA architecture (World Engine + World Behavior Model) of Huawei Qiankun Intelligent Driving ADS 4, generating high-density difficult example scenarios through AI diffusion models. Data density is 1000 times that of real-world acquisition, end-to-end latency is reduced by 50%, and traffic efficiency is improved by 20%. On the hardware level, Avatr 07 is equipped with a 192-line LiDAR, 3 4D mmWave radars, and 27 high-precision sensors, supporting full-scenario pilot assistance and spot-to-spot 2.0 parking functions.
在马来西亚的汽车市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Hyundai Palisade 和 Volkswagen Tiguan 来做比较。今天我们从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Hyundai Palisade 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 368,838 - 399,838，一共有 4 个版本，包括 2023 3.8L 2WD Luxe 7 Seats Petrol（RM 399,838）、2023 2.2T 4WD Executive 7 Seats Diesel（RM 389,838）、2023 3.8L 2WD Luxe 8 Seats Petrol（RM 378,838） 等。
Volkswagen Tiguan 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 206,540 - 260,024，一共有 2 个版本，包括 2025 Allspace 2.0T R-Line（RM 260,024）、2025 Allspace 1.4T Elegance（RM 206,540） 等。
从价钱来看，Volkswagen Tiguan 的起步价比 Hyundai Palisade 便宜了 RM 162,298。老实讲，在这个价位段，几千块的差距其实不算大，关键还是看整体的性价比和长期使用成本。
Hyundai Palisade 搭载 2.0L Turbo，马力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
Volkswagen Tiguan 搭载 2.0L 4-cyl，马力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
动力方面，Hyundai Palisade 的 2.0L Turbo 比 Volkswagen Tiguan 的 2.0L 4-cyl 多了 50 匹马力，中段加速会更有信心，尤其是跑高速公路超车的时候。但 Volkswagen Tiguan 的油耗表现可能更好，日常市区通勤的话差别不会太明显。
Hyundai Palisade 的安全评级是 TBD，主动安全系统包括 Basic。
Volkswagen Tiguan 的安全评级是 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 IQ.Drive。
安全配备方面，两款车都拿到了不错的评级。不过 Hyundai Palisade 的 Basic 和 Volkswagen Tiguan 的 IQ.Drive 在功能上有些差异，如果你比较看重主动安全的话，可以仔细对比一下两者的功能列表。
Hyundai Palisade 保修 5年/300,000km，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
Volkswagen Tiguan 保修 3年/100,000km，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
总的来说，Hyundai Palisade 和 Volkswagen Tiguan 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
在马来西亚的SUV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Mercedes-Benz GLC 和 Audi Q5 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Mercedes-Benz GLC 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 336,888 - 336,888，一共有 2 个版本，包括 GLC 200（RM 290,000）、GLC 300（RM 340,000） 等。
Audi Q5 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 354,174 - 423,174，一共有 2 个版本，包括 40 TDI（RM 320,000）、45 TFSI（RM 350,000） 等。
从价钱来看，Mercedes-Benz GLC 的起步价确实比 Audi Q5 便宜了 RM 17,286。如果你预算有限，Mercedes-Benz 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意，便宜的那几千块，可能在配备上会有取舍，具体要看你的需求。
Mercedes-Benz GLC 搭载 2.0L Turbo，马力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
Audi Q5 搭载 2.0L Turbo，马力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
两款车用的是同一套动力系统，日常开起来的感受基本没有差别。油耗方面也差不多，不用太纠结这一点。
Mercedes-Benz GLC 的安全评级是 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Premium ADAS。
Audi Q5 的安全评级是 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Pre Sense + ACC。
两款车的安全评级一样，在这个级别里面安全配备都算给得很齐全了。现在的新车安全性都不差，不用太担心这一点。
Mercedes-Benz GLC 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Audi Q5 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
两款车的驱动方式一样，都是 FWD，日常驾驶感受不会有太大区别。
总的来说，Mercedes-Benz GLC 和 Audi Q5 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
在马来西亚的SUV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Perodua Aruz 和 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Perodua Aruz 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一共有 2 个版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 129,750 - 129,750，一共有 2 个版本，包括 2025 1.5T 90km CSH（RM 129,750）、What charging methods does the Tiggo 7 PHEV support? Can it be charged using a home power socket?（RM 117,478） 等。
从价钱来看，Perodua Aruz 的起步价确实比 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 便宜了 RM 56,850。如果你预算有限，Perodua 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意，便宜的那几千块，可能在配备上会有取舍，具体要看你的需求。
Perodua Aruz 搭载 1.5L 4-cyl，马力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 搭载 Hybrid，马力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
动力方面，Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 的 Hybrid 比 Perodua Aruz 的 1.5L 4-cyl 多了 65 匹马力。不过日常在市区开，两款车的动力都够用，不会觉得不够力。
Perodua Aruz 保修 5年/150,000km，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 保修 3年/100,000km，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
Perodua Aruz 和 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择，适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价，可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款；如果你更在意性价比和配备，那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾，亲身体验才是最重要的。
总的来说，Perodua Aruz 和 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
Bagi Avatr pada tahun 2026, perniagaan berjalan tidak terlalu lancar. Prospektus Bursa Saham Hong Kong yang luput secara automatik selepas 6 bulan baru sahaja menimbulkan banyak spekulasi, fakta bahawa jualan suku pertama kurang cemerlang serta kejatuhan mendadak dalam tempoh bulan April berbanding tahun lalu, makin ramai yang berpendapat sama ada jenama yang disokong oleh tiga raksasa Changan, Huawei dan CATL ini sudah tidak berfungsi. Jadi, adakah jenama premium yang pernah dianggap berpotensi tanpa henti ini masih boleh "berbalik keadaan"?
Jualan turun seperti tebing, di mana masalahnya?
Avatr yang pada tahun 2025 masih dianggap akan berkembang pesat, sejak memasuki 2026 terus sahaja "tersandung". Mengikut data Persatuan Industri Kenderaan, pada suku pertama 2026 Avatr mengumpulkan penghantaran sebanyak 11,392 unit, menurun secara mendadak 53.5% berbanding tahun lalu, penurunan hampir dua kali ganda purata industri, jualan bulanan tunggal kurang daripada 40% daripada puncak tahun lalu. Jika dibandingkan dengan jenama seperti Li Auto, Leapmotor, Xiaomi pada tempoh yang sama, jurangnya lebih jelas kelihatan.
Dikatakan bersandar pada syarikat besar lebih selesa, sebagai jenama premium yang disokong oleh tiga raksasa Changan, Huawei dan CATL, mengapa Avatr boleh "tertinggal" begitu cepat? Sebenarnya, melihat prestasi Avatr sekarang, tidak sukar mengesan masalah. Pada mulanya Avatr disokong oleh "tiga raksasa", tiga tawaran utama "kekuatan Changan + pemacu pintar Huawei + bateri CATL" dikeluarkan, masih boleh menarik ramai pembeli.
Tetapi kini, teknologi Huawei hampir menjadi "sumber daya awam" seluruh industri, bateri CATL bukan milik eksklusif Avatr, Changan juga ada jenama lain perlu dijaga, keunikan "segitiga besi" asalnya perlahan-lahan pudar, Avatr secara semulajadi tidak boleh mendapat sokongan pengguna dengan mudah.
Sudah tentu, Avatr boleh menarik pelanggan dengan rangkaian produk yang lengkap dan perkhidmatan cemerlang. Malangnya, Avatr seolah-nya belum mempunyai kemampuan ini buat sementara. Satu sisi, Avatr terperangkap dalam julat harga yang sangat kompetitif, jenama seperti Tesla, BYD, Xiaomi, Zeekr mempunyai kawasan masing-masing, Avatr yang belum mempunyai label jelas ingin masuk terlalu sukar.
"Penggantian model pantas yang mengecewakan" di hujung produk membuatkan pengguna kecewa. "Insiden pengkhianatan" tahun lalu dipercayai ramai masih ingat, Avatr 12 edisi 4 laser baru dikeluarkan, jenama mengeluarkan model baharu dengan 896 line dual optical path LiDAR, prestasi pemanduan pintar meningkat besar, kenderaan pemilik lama nilainya jatuh serta-merta, kadar diskaun kereta terpakai sehingga 35% hingga 40%, menyebabkan bantahan pengguna besar-besaran dan reputasi runtuh. Ditambah pula produk baharu Avatr 2026 tidak keluar juga, irama produk "terputus", minat pengguna rendah, jualan suku pertama sukar diteruskan.
Menukar tiga pengerusi dalam empat tahun, bagaimana nak bergelut?
Penurunan jualan hanya masalah permukaan, goncangan berterusan pengurusan mungkin "bom" yang ditanam sejak lama. Tidak tahu sama ada anda perhatikan, dari 2021 hingga sekarang, Avatr sudah menukar tiga pengerusi. Pertama Tan Benhong, kemudian akhir 2023 Zhu Huarong sendiri mengambil alih, pada September 2025, "generasi 80-an" Wang Hui mengambil alih, sama dengan tiga menukar pemimpin dalam empat tahun.
Zaman Tan Benhong, Avatr mengambil luan premium elektrik sepenuhnya, hasilnya tahun 2023 hanya jual 27,600 unit. Jualan tidak berapa baik, Avatr tidak beri terlalu banyak peluang, terus menukar Zhu Huarong mengambil alih. Fikiran Zhu Huarong berbeza dengan yang lepas, selepas mengambil alih terus bertukar, semua model pasang EREV, dan harga turun ke paras 200,000, jualan memang naik, tapi dikritik sebagai "penurunan tahap". Bila Wang Hui, mula bercakap "anti-persaingan tidak wajar" "lompatan nilai", memacu "Strategi 2.0".
Mungkin maksud asal menukar pemimpin ialah untuk jenama semakin baik, tapi falsafah pengurusan, keputusan pentadbir tinggi berbeza-beza, menukar pentadbir tinggi sekerap ini, kesan pada jenama jelas. Perbezaan ini juga mencerminkan masalah "pengurusan segi tiga" Avatr, semua tahu Avatr disokong tiga tokoh, tapi sedikit orang fikirkan, sama ada tiga "tokoh" dengan tujuan berbeza akan menjejaskan "lajur" normal Avatr kerana fokus berbeza.
Di sebalik setiap pengerusi ada logik pemegang saham berbeza, Avatr kadang di atas 300,000 "angkat tinggi", kadang推 Avatr 07 harga 219,900 turun ke pasaran, selepas beberapa masa model baharu mungkin naikkan harga lagi. Adakah goncangan berulang ini dipengaruhi pengambil keputusan berbeza, kami tidak tahu. Tapi jenama yang tidak mantap sendiri, nak "berperang" di pasaran premium, nampaknya tidak beri keyakinan.
Uang diluar negara, tapi belum pasti "selamatkan nyawa"
Walaupun keadaan domestik tidak menentu, prestasi luar negara Avatr agak baik. Sejak memulakan globalisasi September 2024, Avatr sudah masuk lebih 40 negara dan kawasan, dan di beberapa pasaran sudah capai untung stabil. Di Thailand, Avatr 11 harga mula 447,000 RMB, kekal No 1 dalam carta jualan EV premium; Di UAE, ambil 10% pasaran EV premium tempatan; Di Singapura, Avatr 11 dijual 1.56 juta RMB, jualan masih naik. Dari pencapaian luar negara, taktik Avatr boleh dikata berjaya.
Tapi masalahnya, jumlah luar negara ini, boleh putar semula situasi Avatr nanti tidak? Melihat sekarang, mungkin tidak begitu optimis. Target luar negara Avatr 2026 55,000 unit, harap 2030 asing 40%, idea kedengaran baik, tapi nak keluar lembah kerugian, jualan bulan mesti 20,000+ baru ada skala. Skala luar negara ini, dalam piring besar, berat tidak cukup.
Lihat lagi keupayaan penjanaan keuntungan, Avatr rugi 4.018 bilion 2024, separuh pertama 2025 rugi 1.585 bilion, tiga tahun setengah kumulatif rugi lebih 11.3 bilion. Walaupun luar negara untung beberapa ratus juta setahun, hadapi rugi juta bulan dalam negara, keuntungan luar negara, mungkin tidak cukup tutup rugi domestik.
Ini bukan bermaksud Avatr keluar tidak bernilai, posisi premium, premium brand, rantaian berbeza, semua betul. Tapi untuk jenama Suku 1 2026 jualan potong dua, IPO tangguh, rugi 10 bilian pusing, luar negara sekarang hanya tambah mata, sukar jadi jerami penyelamat. Kata lain, perang sebenar balik, mesti dalam negara. Tahun ini sudah lalui beberapa bulan, Avatr nak "balik", mungkin tidak mudah.
Penutup
Asas Avatr tidak lemah, disokong tiga raksasa industri, pasaran luar negara terus berkembang, rizab teknologi pun tidak kurang, asas masih sangat baik. Cuma, persaingan pasaran sangat sengit, ruang masa Avatr semakin sempit. Balik soalan awal: Adakah Avatr boleh balik? Jawapan soalan ini sekarang belum pasti. Tapi boleh jangka, suku 1 jualan potong dua, rugi 10 bilian ada, IPO tangguh, pasaran satu hari satu hari lebih sengit, jika tidak keluar produk panas H2, "pemboleh ubah" ini akan menindas jenama sehingga tidak bernafas.
© 2024 Bitauto.com. All Rights Reserved.
Bitauto (www.yiche.com and www.bitauto.com) is one of the most visited automotive websites in China. We provide detailed info on Chinese car brands available in your area. Please note that the information provided on this website is based on publicly available data and is for reference only. It may not be fully updated or accurate at all times.
Help us improve our website
