Hometravelers
Search History
Popular Searches
Dealer Login / Sign Up
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X90 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫手幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，合共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800）等。
Chery Tiggo Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 88,750 - 99,750，合共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH（RM 99,750）、2025 1.5T Standard（RM 88,750）等。
由價錢睇，Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅起跳價比 Proton X90 平咗 RM 18,050。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵始終係睇整體嘅性價比同長遠使用成本。
Proton X90 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo Cross 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Proton X90 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力，中段加速更有信心，尤其係行高速公路超車嘅時候。不過 Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅油耗可能更友善，日常市區通勤差別唔會太大。
Proton X90 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都攞到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X90 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有少少差異，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X90 車身長 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。
Chery Tiggo Cross 車身長 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X90 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你比較看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你比較在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終始終建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總括嚟講，Proton X90 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊部，關鍵始終係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先再試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
2026, separuh jalan jadual telah dilalui, pasaran automotif Cina menyelesaikan separuh pertama dalam perang harga dan permintaan yang lemah. Apabila kebanyakan pemain masih mengira bagaimana untuk keluar dari "menukar harga dengan kuantiti", Kereta Changan meletakkan laporan separuh tahun, menunjukkan ketegasan strategik dan kelenturan taktikal syarikat kerajaan baharu.
Bangkit sebenar Kutub Ketiga
Menonton prestasi separuh tahun pertama Changan, yang paling mengujakan tentu saja "menonjol sendiri" di pasaran luar negara.
Jumlah penghantaran luar negara sebanyak 402,000 unit, pertumbuhan setanding tahun sebelumnya 35.1%, nisbah jualan keseluruhan melonjak ke 33.6%. Berbanding sasaran luar negara 750,000 unit untuk keseluruhan tahun, kadar pencapaian 53.6% menjadikan laporan ini bernilai tinggi. Dalam pasaran sedia ada yang persaingan sengit, segmen luar negara dengan pertumbuhan tinggi membuktikan kepragmatikan strategik antarabangsa Changan, menjadi enjin yang paling kuat untuk menarikkan pasaran.
Inilah bukan sekadar eksport produk, tetapi perubahan kualitatif dari 1.0 ke 2.0 dalam Rancangan Menampung Seribu Sungai. Kilang Anapolis Brazil siap pada Mac dan mula beroperasi, kapasiti pengeluaran awal 90,000 unit setahun; Kilang Rayong Thailand mula beroperasi, versi stereng kanan Deep Blue S05 telah keluar dari laluan pengeluaran — Changan sedang mengubah版图 luar negara dari "eksport perdagangan" ke "eksport industri".
Paling penting ialah logik keuntungan. Apabila pasaran automotif domestik tenggelam dalam perang harga, struktur keuntungan pasaran luar negara cukup untuk memikat mana-mana pelabur yang rasional. Nilai sebenar operasi luar negara bukan sahaja kelihatan dari nombor jualan, tetapi lebih dari peningkatan sebenar nilai jenama global Changan. Di tapak strategik seperti Asia Tenggara dan Amerika Selatan, Changan sedang mempercepatkan蜕变 dari jenama tempatan ke jenama global dengan pengeluaran tempatan + kombinasi produk yang disesuaikan mengikut rantau.
Penyesuaian struktur tenaga baharu, bersedia dengan tenaga penuh
Hantaran tenaga baharu 173,800 unit, pertumbuhan setanding tahun sebelumnya 5.2%. Kelajuan pertumbuhan ini, dalam latar belakang penyusutan pasaran keseluruhan, kelihatan sangat padu.
Dalam matriks jenama sub, kejayaan menembus keluar Changan Qiyuan dan kestabilan Deep Blue sama-sama mengagumkan. Qiyuan mencapai jumlah penghantaran terkumpul 173,800 unit untuk separuh tahun pertama, siri AQ tumbuh 102.6%, Q05 mendominasi carta pasaran SUV kompak. Di atas laporan prestasi Deep Blue 164,200 unit, luar negara 35,800 unit tumbuh setanding tahun sebelumnya 141%, kelajuan eksport yang memukau industri, adalah bukti terbaik kekuatan jenama Deep Blue.
Akui tahun pertama Avatr menunjukkan prestasi yang biasa-biasa sahaja, tetapi tarikan sebenar ada pada separuh tahun kedua. Avatr 07L akan memuatkan Huawei Qiankun ADS 5 untuk pertama kali, butik utama baharu akan meliputi lebih dari 20 bandar dalam tahun ini — kad untuk pendirian tahap tinggi, Changan memainkannya dengan sabar dan berhemah.
Kadar pencapaian sasaran keseluruhan tenaga baharu Changan separuh tahun pertama adalah 32.5%, nampaknya masih mempunyai ruang, tetapi sebenarnya menyediakan asas untuk ledakan teknologi separuh tahun kedua. Teknologi hibrid Bluestone Ultra telah mencapai 2.98L konsumsi per 100km di bandar, kecekapan haba hampir 45%; sistem bantuan pemanduan "Tianchu" yang direka sendiri akan dilancarkan rasmi di Pameran Automotif Chongqing. Penyaluran teknologi dari penghujungan penyelidikan ke penghujungan produk akan dilepaskan secara terkumpul di separuh tahun kedua.
Penyelidikan sendiri adalah kad terbaik
Jika diurai separuh tahun pertama Changan, terobosan teknologi adalah warna asas yang paling patut dititikberatkan.
Pameran Automotif Beijing Mac, jenama "Tianchu" dilancarkan rasmi, sistem bantuan pemanduan "Tianchu" memukau pada persembahan sulung. Ini bukan sekadar tindanan fungsi biasa, tetapi perwujudan strategi "kontrol keseluruhan stack" Changan di trek teras kecerdasan. Industri memimpin seperti stabiliti walaupun tayar meletup, membuktikan keupayaan keseimbangan pasukan teknologi di antara algoritma asas dan pelaksanaan kejuruteraan.
Pengeluaran besar-besaran hibrid Bluestone Ultra, pula adalah kad lain di trek elektrifikasi. Pelancaran Ezid Generasi Keempat dan CS75PLUS, menandakan Changan telah mencapai lonjakan dari mengikut ke memimpin dalam teknologi hibrid. Dalam masa kini di mana sistem hibrid mencolok baru sahaja bermula, keseimbangan sistem ini di antara kecekapan tenaga dan prestasi, akan membentuk daya saing berterusan di pasaran akhir.
Separuh tahun kedua, orang lain menanggung kesusahan, Changan menunggu angin datang
Penambahbaikan struktur separuh tahun pertama, telah membina papan lompat untuk fokus strategik separuh tahun kedua.
Serangan produk sudah jelas. Changan Qiyuan Q06 akan memuatkan sistem "Tianchu" untuk pertama kali dalam pengeluaran besar-besaran — ini akan menjadi peristiwa penting bagi teknologi pemanduan diri Changan yang direka sendiri menuju pasaran secara besar-besaran. Penempatan padat lebih dari 10 model baharu dan model penambahbaikan, akan membentuk liputan penuh pada selang harga utama dari segi produk.
Serangan luar negara berterusan ditambah. Kilang Thailand, Brazil meningkatkan kapasiti, penempatan tempatan strategi Rancangan Menampung Seribu Sungai 2.0 akan masuk ke fasa operasi sebenar daripada perancangan. Dari "keluar" ke "masuk", pembedahan dalam pasaran luar negara Changan sedang memasuki tempoh hasil.
Serangan teknologi bersedia untuk melancarkan. Bonus teknologi kecerdasan dan elektrifikasi, akan dilepaskan dengan lebih memuaskan pada model baharu separuh tahun kedua. Enjin ganda "Tianchu" dan "Bluestone", Changan sedang melengkapkan penukaran dari rizab teknologi ke tenaga pasaran.
Ulasan Web Auto : Ada yang meragui kadar pencapaian sasaran keseluruhan, tetapi mengabaikan penurunan 23.8% pasaran industri keseluruhan; Ada yang membesarkan perlambatan pertumbuhan tenaga baharu, tetapi tidak melihat halangan teknologi di sebalik hibrid Bluestone dan pemanduan diri "Tianchu".
Sasaran 5 juta unit dan TOP10 global yang ditetapkan oleh Pengerusi Kereta Changan Zhu Huarong untuk 2030, pasti adalah sebuah marathon. Penyesuaian irama, penambahbaikan struktur, penembusan luar negara, pengumpulan teknologi separuh pertama — semua kerja yang nampak tidak begitu "menarik" ini, tepatlah sedang mengumpul tenaga untuk pacuan separuh kedua.
Pasaran automotif Cina 2026, perlawanan penyingkiran sudah diketengahkan. Bagi syarikat kerajaan baharu yang telah melengkapkan perubahan identiti seperti Changan, nilai separuh pertama tidak pernah pada berapa banyak pacuan, tetapi pada mencari arah yang betul dalam perubahan besar, dan memperkukuh kemahiran dalaman. Pistol permulaan separuh kedua sudah berbunyi, tenaga potensi tiga iaitu teknologi, produk dan globalisasi sedang berubah menjadi tenaga tindakan pasaran yang nyata.
Pemimpin yang tulen, mahir dalam menyesuaikan postur dalam angin berlawanan, mencari larian terbaik dalam perubahan. Dari susun atur separuh pertama, separuh kedua Changan 2026, lebih diharap.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X70 同 Hyundai Tucson 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你慳做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
Hyundai Tucson 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 143,888 - 197,888，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige（RM 197,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige（RM 186,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime（RM 164,888） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X70 嘅起步價確實比 Hyundai Tucson 平咗 RM 37,088。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嘅嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需要。
Proton X70 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Hyundai Tucson 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩款車用到同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感受基本冇差別。油耗方面都差不多，唔使太糾結這一點。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Hyundai Tucson 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 SmartSense。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算畀得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心這一點。
Proton X70 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Hyundai Tucson 保修 5 年/300,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Proton X70 同 Hyundai Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場好好嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysia SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Ativa and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Ativa's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 62,500 - 73,400, with a total of 3 variants, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400), etc.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 123,750 - 123,750, with a total of 2 variants, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 125,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 140,000), etc.
From a price perspective, Perodua Ativa's starting price is indeed RM 61,250 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 7 Pro. If you have a limited budget, Perodua's entry-level model can already meet daily needs. However, keep in mind that the few thousand ringgit savings might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Ativa's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro's safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
In terms of safety features, both cars received good ratings. However, there are some functional differences between Perodua Ativa's ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro's Basic. If you value active safety, you can carefully compare the feature lists of both.
Perodua Ativa uses FWD drive mode.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro uses FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, FWD, so there will not be much difference in daily driving feel.
Perodua Ativa warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Perodua Ativa and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are mainstream choices in the Malaysia market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Perodua Ativa and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are quite good models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a major matter; spending time on research will definitely not be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Proton X50 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with 2 versions in total, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with 4 versions in total, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
From a price perspective, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 16,900 cheaper than Proton X50. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note, the few thousand cheaper price might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz features 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp power. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Proton X50 features 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp power. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, and the driving feel is basically the same for daily use. Fuel consumption is also similar, so no need to worry too much about this point.
Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Both cars have almost identical dimensions, and the interior space difference is not significant. Cars of this level are fully sufficient for daily use.
Perodua Aruz uses FWD drive system.
Proton X50 uses 4WD drive system.
Perodua's FWD and Proton's 4WD will have different handling sensations, recommended to test drive and compare.
Perodua Aruz and Proton X50 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the model with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Proton X50 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from multiple car dealers, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家在揀車嘅時候都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面嚟作一個詳細比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等。
Mitsubishi Xforce 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 109,930 - 119,930，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Ultimate（RM 119,930）、2026 1.5L Urban（RM 109,930） 等。
由價錢嚟睇，Perodua Aruz 嘅起售價確實比 Mitsubishi Xforce 平咗 RM 37,030。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Perodua Aruz 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括。
Mitsubishi Xforce 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 MI-PILOT。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Perodua Aruz 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mitsubishi Xforce 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Perodua Aruz 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最緊要嘅。
總括嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Subaru Crosstrek when selecting a car. These two models have quite similar pricing and positioning. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Perodua Aruz in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
The OTR price of Subaru Crosstrek in Malaysia is RM 145,000 - 160,000, with a total of 1 version, including 2.0L e-Boxer (RM 150,000), etc.
In terms of price, the Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 72,100 cheaper than the Subaru Crosstrek. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. However, also note that the savings of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in equipment, depending specifically on your needs.
The safety rating of Perodua Aruz is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.
The safety rating of Subaru Crosstrek is 5★ (Euro NCAP), active safety systems include EyeSight.
Perodua Aruz body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Subaru Crosstrek body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. Cars in this class are fully sufficient for daily use.
Perodua Aruz and Subaru Crosstrek are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use, daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and equipment, then choose the model with richer configuration. Ultimately it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Subaru Crosstrek are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest everyone do their homework, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major decision, spending time on research will definitely not be a mistake.
2026 年嘅中國智能汽車產業，正經歷從功能堆砌向體驗定義嘅深層轉型，衡量其成功與否嘅關鍵標尺，喺人同車之間能否建立超越指令輸入、更富情感溫度嘅互動關係。而無論係座艙內嘅人機互動，定係座艙外嘅環境溝通，體驗嘅落地最終都指向同一個物理載體：光。
當智能汽車試圖喺人同機器之間建立更自然、更高效嘅溝通時，光電系統便從傳統嘅輔助性部件，升級為決定體驗上限嘅核心要件。
呢一轉變嘅直接投射，體現喺人同車之間雙向溝通嘅兩個關鍵點上，一個係車向人傳遞資訊嘅顯示界面，另一個係車向外界表達意圖嘅光影投影界面。前者，AR-HUD 已經從技術驗證走向規模量產；後者，智能車燈已經完成從單純照明向資訊投影、安全互動嘅延伸。
當然，而家嘅行業背景下，兩個應用場景都面臨住相同嘅底層挑戰：光學系統嘅集成度、小型化同車規可靠性。呢其實亦意味著，車載光學嘅競爭邏輯已經發生根本性改變——從單一器件嘅參數比拼，升級為系統級光學解決方案嘅整合能力較量。
正喺呢一產業邏輯轉換嘅關口上，沂普光電近期嘅戰略布局，率先畀出咗系統級嘅發力方案。呢家以自由曲面光學起家嘅企業，喺短短數月內，唔僅完成咗總部嘅遷移，仲接連將蘇州龍馬璞芯、江西德凱納入自己嘅版圖，有意識地構建一條覆蓋光學設計、核心芯片、光機集成、整車光影互動嘅完整價值鏈，以系統整合者嘅姿態，卡位新一輪產業週期。
總部南遷：錨定車載光電嘅產業新坐標
2025 年 12 月，沂普光電完成咗總部遷址，新總部位福建晉江南翼高新區，之後嘅數月內，沂普光電嘅研發中心及核心生產中心陸續投產，並於 7 月 28 日，正式舉辦咗總部開幕典禮。
圖片來源：沂普光電
對於一家成立於 2018 年（核心技術積累可以追溯至 2005 年嘅天津大學微納製造實驗室）、已喺天津深耕多年嘅國家級高新技術企業而言，今次嘅總部南遷，被沂普光電 (福建) 有限公司董事長郭躍武定義為"新嘅戰略升級"。
而家，沂普光電喺自由曲面光學系統設計、超精密光學元器件製造及檢測、光學性能測量系統集成等關鍵領域，已實現完整嘅技術積累，將呢樣技術底蘊從天津遷到福建晉江，佢嘅戰略意圖遠超地理層面嘅空間位移，而係一次將二十年技術積累重新錨定喺產業高地嘅戰略抉擇。
圖片來源：沂普光電
晉江嘅區位價值喺多重優勢嘅疊加。
晉江唔但有完善嘅電子信息及光電顯示產業集群，更有務實高效嘅政府服務同"敢拼會贏"嘅創業精神，郭躍武表示，南翼芯創港作為區域科技創新嘅重要載體，為沂普光電提供咗理想嘅發展平台。
總部位落晉江後，將承擔起核心研發同運營管理職能，同佈局喺深圳、阜陽、天津、廬江、武漢、無錫、萍鄉以及日本、馬來西亞等地嘅海、內外生產基地同研發、研銷中心形成協同發展嘅產業矩陣，加速沂普光電嘅集團化進程。此外值得一提嘅係，作為著名僑鄉同對外開放嘅前沿陣地，福建喺出海方面擁有天然嘅政策同區位優勢，呢亦同沂普光電正在推進嘅全球化戰略，形成咗高度嘅戰略契合。
圖片來源：蓋世汽車
更深層嘅考量喺市場供給嘅便利性。福建緊鄰中國南部汽車產業集群，係多家頭部新能源車企嘅供應鏈腹地，將總部同核心加工能力遷移至此，沂普光電實際上完成咗一次"離市場更近、離創新更近"嘅戰略升級。
喺車載光學產品從研發到量產週期不斷壓縮嘅產業大環境下，呢種地理上嘅嵌入，意味著更快嘅客戶響應速度、更緊密嘅協同研發節奏同更低嘅物流同溝通成本，企業整體嘅創新節奏，亦將會同產業嘅迭代週期更加同頻共振。
戰略整合：連點成鏈嘅系統能力躍升
如果話總部南遷解決嘅係"喺邊度競爭"嘅問題，咁近期對龍馬璞芯同德凱嘅收購，則係更好地回答咗"靠乜嘢競爭"嘅核心命題。
2026 年 5 月，沂普光電宣佈正式啟動對蘇州龍馬璞芯科技有限公司嘅戰略收購。龍馬璞芯由中科院同國際光學團隊發起，專注於 MEMS 顯示控制芯片、無源合束芯片、HUD 光機同微振鏡等領域嘅研發，喺車載投影芯片、光機集成同 MEMS 驅動控制等領域，都有成熟嘅技術同產品佈局。
圖片來源：沂普光電
龍馬璞芯自主研發嘅 LBS（Laser Beam Scanning）MEMS 激光掃描核心技術已完成車規級可靠性同功能安全驗證，標誌住國產 MEMS 光學掃描方案，已經邁入車載規模化量產嘅新階段。
呢一收購嘅戰略意圖好清晰：向上掌控核心芯片。LBS MEMS 技術以 MEMS 微振鏡為核心執行單元，結合激光光源同高速調製算法，實現小體積、低功耗、無聚焦、高色域嘅激光掃描成像。同傳統 DLP、LCoS 方案相比，LBS MEMS 喺車載嚴苛環境下具備更優嘅抗震性、溫度適應性同空間利用率。對沂普光電而言，龍馬璞芯帶來嘅 MEMS 芯片同微振鏡能力，令佢喺光電顯示領域實現咗從光學器件到核心芯片嘅能力延伸。
如果話收購龍馬璞芯係"向上掌控"，咁收購江西德凱則係"向下拓展"。
日前，沂普光電正式宣佈完成咗對江西德凱車燈有限公司嘅戰略收購。德凱已經深耕汽車智能照明十餘年，具備整車全套車燈總成獨立研發、模具開發、自動化量產交付嘅能力，現有客戶覆蓋咗國內十餘家主流汽車品牌。
沂普光電此前喺車載顯示方面已有 HUD、車內投影、車外投影大燈等產品佈局，德凱嘅加入，助力沂普光電喺整車車燈領域實現咗從座艙內顯示到車外照明嘅完整覆蓋，系統性競爭力得到咗質嘅提升。正如郭躍武所講，今次併購後，沂普光電成為咗而家國內唯一具備從顯示芯片到顯示模組再到顯示整機全鏈路能力嘅科技企業。
收購完成後嘅協同效應值得深入剖析，沂普光電 (福建) 有限公司 CEO 許張飛向蓋世汽車介紹咗呢一模式喺客戶端嘅實際價值：過去客戶需要面對多家供應商分別溝通，溝通成本同管理負擔都相當沉重，而家，沂普光電一家就可以完成從芯片到總成嘅全鏈條協同，內部一個溝通會即可協調整個產品嘅定位同開發。呢一能力並非簡單嘅產能疊加，而係直接回應咗合作夥伴對交付效率同成本控制嘅雙重訴求。
兩次收購嘅節奏緊湊、邏輯清晰——龍馬璞芯解決嘅係"看得清"嘅核心芯片同掃描技術，德凱解決嘅係"照得亮"嘅車外光影同量產製造，再疊加沂普光電原有嘅自由曲面光學設計同精密製造能力，一家覆蓋芯片、光學、光機、整車嘅全棧車載光學能力體系已然成形。
沂普光電 (福建) 有限公司市場戰略總裁盧睿，喺接受蓋世汽車採訪時，從競爭差異化嘅角度進一步闡釋咗呢套體系嘅獨特價值，併購重組之後，從上游芯片到中間光學系統，再到製造同整體解決方案，沂普光電形成咗完整嘅差異化佈局，行業內唔少企業而家既冇涉及芯片層，又冇下沉到底層光學製造，兩端缺失嘅情況下即便能夠提供單一解決方案，都難以喺技術、加工同成本三個維度上真正形成綜合性嘅競爭優勢，而呢啲能力嘅疊加，正係沂普光電喺未來產業格局中佔據主動嘅關鍵所在。
喺過去嘅供應鏈體系中，芯片、光學器件、光機系統、整車應用分屬唔同層級嘅供應商，彼此之間存在住技術銜接嘅縫隙同商業利益嘅博弈。當一家企業能夠從上游嘅顯示芯片一直貫通到下游嘅整車光影互動，佢就獲得咗喺現有供應體系中極為稀缺嘅能力——用系統級嘅視角來定義產品、優化成本同加速迭代。呢種能力，喺體驗定義汽車嘅新時代，正喺成為決定企業上限嘅關鍵變量。
圖片來源：沂普光電
重新定義人車互動嘅光學"語言"
持續完善技術能力嘅同時，沂普光電對車載光學嘅理解亦喺持續深化。呢種深化唔僅體現在產品線嘅拓展上，更體現在對行業共性難題嘅系統性攻關同對未來互動形態嘅前瞻性佈局上。
從行業趨勢來看，車載光學正處於從可選配置向核心系統躍遷嘅關鍵節點上。
隨著 L3 級自動駕駛嘅加速到來，AR-HUD 將提供更多智能互動、安全可靠同便捷娛樂嘅場景應用，未來嘅市場潛力，有望持續釋放。智能車燈領域，百萬像素等智能車燈技術，喺唔少國內高端新能源車型上，都已經成為主打嘅產品亮點，未來，隨著呢一配置嘅市場下探，亦勢必將引領車載互動類、娛樂類功能向個性化、可自定義等方向加速發展。而車載投影則憑藉大畫幅、多場景、可玩性等優勢，亦喺逐步成為中高端車型後排屏嘅重要選項。
呢啲趨勢共同指向一個核心命題：光正喺成為汽車同人之間核心嘅互動媒介，車載光，有望成為汽車產業潛在嘅新增長曲線。
但趨勢嘅明朗並唔意味著路徑嘅平坦。而家行業面臨嘅共性難題依然突出：安全同法規嘅兼容、技術壁壘嘅突破、成本同性能嘅平衡等，都係制約車載光學大規模普及嘅現實障礙。以 AR-HUD 為例，更大畫幅、更小體積、更高像質係未來嘅發展方向，但點樣喺有限嘅車內空間中實現呢些目標，同時滿足車規級嘅可靠性要求，考驗住每一家參與者嘅系統能力。
當然，正喺呢啲行業難題面前，沂普光電嘅全棧能力，價值尤為凸顯。郭躍武明確指出，做精密光學嘅人，冇捷徑，只有不斷創新。"車正喺由原本嘅行駛工具，變成一個移動嘅家"，郭躍武表示，喺成為移動嘅家之後，車就需要為客人提供更多嘅情緒價值，作為光電顯示供應商，就需要從顯示、聲音、體感等各個方面，持續提供創新產品。
沂普光電正喺推進一系列嘅創新方向。比如喺車上，沂普光電創新提出咗超短焦嘅間隔投影，滿足用戶體驗嘅同時，仲能減小體積，方便安裝。許張飛喺產品展廳演示咗呢一技術嘅底層邏輯——將激光電視嘅超短焦顯示技術引入車內，唔僅實現咗更高嘅色域、亮度同解析度，更重要嘅係一體機設計徹底解決咗傳統投影方案中人員走動遮擋光路嘅痛點。沂普光電仲喺探索另一項前瞻性嘅應用創新——將激光雷達同數字化智能大燈融合。傳統激光雷達安裝喺車頂，唔僅造型突兀，仲面臨無法自清潔嘅安全隱患，而大燈本身具備成熟嘅自清潔功能，將激光雷達嵌入大燈總成後，既能保障傳感器全天候可靠性，亦能顯著優化整車外觀嘅流暢度。
圖片來源：沂普光電
用最新嘅技術，最高嘅性能，滿足終端用戶對車內外顯示嘅更優體驗，正如郭躍武所講："只有不斷嘅創新才能打動消費者，為呢個充分競爭嘅行業注入新嘅活力。"
盧睿從技術路線嘅角度，補充咗沂普光電嘅差異化思考。過去沂普光電聚焦於光學元件製造、鏡頭解決方案及光機系統交付等，更多扮演嘅係加工方案輸出者嘅角色，而隨著 LBS MEMS 芯片等能力嘅補全，沂普光電喺消費類領域已經具備輸出微投、超短焦、高亮直投等完整解決方案嘅實力，完成咗從加工方案輸出者到完整解決方案提供商嘅定位躍升。
呢一轉變嘅背後係企業價值定位嘅再升級，進入到價值更高嘅系統集成環節，擁有咗定義產品形態同互動體驗嘅能力。
圖片來源：沂普光電
小結：
從自由曲面光學技術起步，到具備覆蓋 HUD、光芯片、車燈等嘅全鏈路能力，沂普光電走嘅係一條從單點技術突破到系統能力構建嘅演進路徑，其背後折射出嘅唔僅係企業對光學技術代際更替嘅敏銳把握，更係對智能汽車產業走向體驗定義呢一底層趨勢嘅深刻理解。
總部南遷，解決嘅唔係簡單嘅空間位移，而係將研發決策、客戶響應同供應鏈協同嵌入產業腹地，令企業嘅創新節奏同產業嘅迭代週期更加同頻共振。對龍馬璞芯同德凱嘅戰略整合，完成嘅則係一次完整嘅光學生態"拼圖"，獲得咗喺現有車載光學供應體系中極為稀缺嘅能力組合：從光芯片到光器件，從光機系統到整車光影互動，全部融為一體，實現核心技術自主可控，構建獨一無二嘅產業生態優勢。
而家嘅汽車行業有一個共識，智能汽車競爭嘅上半場圍繞"三電"展開，拼嘅係續航同加速；下半場嘅角逐則錨定體驗同互動，而所有體驗——無論係 HUD 投射嘅導航指引，定係車燈鋪陳嘅安全光毯，亦或係座艙內流動嘅氛圍光影等，終須透過光嚟傳達。
誰能夠喺光嘅鏈路中實現從源頭到終端嘅全棧掌控，誰就擁有咗定義下一代人車互動嘅能力底座。沂普光電所構建嘅"芯片 - 光學 - 光機 - 車燈"全鏈體系，恰恰正喺為呢個正喺到來嘅光電定義體驗嘅新時代，修築底層基座。
當光嘅鏈路從元器件延伸至場景、從艙內貫通至艙外，一家企業所能定義嘅就唔僅係產品參數，更係一種全新嘅行業趨勢。
[Lead: The latest Q2 2026 financial report released by General Motors proves a fact: although multinational automakers face challenges in the new energy vehicle era, they still show tenacious vitality.]
Author: Zhang Dachuan
How is the life of multinational auto giants so far this year? Recently, General Motors presented a passable mid-term exam result.
The Q2 2026 financial report of General Motors shows that the company achieved revenue of $48 billion this quarter, up 1.9% year-on-year, higher than the market's prior expectation of $46.67 billion; Adjusted EBIT reached $3.9 billion, with the profit margin rising to 8.2%. Thanks to the positive expectations for annual operating performance and market prospects, the company raised its full-year performance guidance for the second time this year, increasing the Adjusted EBIT target range to $14 billion to $16 billion.
△ General Motors' Q2 financial report performance data was good
However, there is a drag factor in the report. Affected by about $2.3 billion in strategic restructuring expenses for the electric vehicle business, General Motors' net income attributable to shareholders for this quarter was $1.3 billion, a year-on-year decline of 31.1%. However, if this non-recurring factor is excluded, the company's core operating profitability has actually improved significantly compared to the same period last year, and overall performance remains robust.
△ Electric vehicle business strategic restructuring brought about a $2.3 billion expense impact
GM North America business profitability remains strong
The North American market remains the most important profit source for General Motors and the core foundation supporting its overall performance. In Q2 2026, GM's North American business achieved Adjusted EBIT of $3.446 billion, contributing the vast majority of the company's operating profit; the Adjusted EBIT margin further increased to 8.6%, up 2.5 percentage points year-on-year, with profitability continuing to strengthen.
This is mainly due to the continued strong sales of high-profit models under brands such as Chevrolet and GMC in the North American market. General Motors has held the title of best-selling full-size SUV in the US for 52 consecutive years and has ranked first in full-size pickup sales for 7 consecutive years, holding about a 43% market share in this high-profit segment. Even facing strong competitors such as Ford's F-Series and RAM under Stellantis, General Motors maintains its leading position through the synergy of multiple brands such as Chevrolet and GMC. The new generation Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra 1500 scheduled to launch in Q4 this year are expected to further consolidate its competitive advantage in North America's most profitable segment.
△ General Motors holds about a 43% market share in the North American full-size pickup segment
Compared to the electric vehicle business which is still in an adjustment phase, General Motors' intelligent connected business is gradually growing into a new profit growth engine, with the profitability of software subscriptions and digital services continuing to be released. The report shows that by the end of Q2, OnStar deferred revenue reached $6.3 billion, up nearly 50% year-on-year, providing a solid foundation for continued recognition of future software service revenue; Super Cruise confirmed revenue grew by about 70% year-on-year, maintaining a high-speed growth trend. Compared to traditional vehicle business, software and digital services have higher gross margins and stronger sustainable profitability. As related business scales continue to expand, General Motors will not only be able to generate more recurring income throughout the vehicle lifecycle but also optimize the revenue structure and improve overall profit quality and financial performance.
△ General Motors' intelligent connected business is gradually growing into a new profit growth engine
SAIC-GM's strategic status rises
In General Motors' Q2 2026 financial report, the China business remains under close attention. Although General Motors has continued to scale back investments in China in recent years, the equity earnings from the China business still grew by 16.9% year-on-year and have been profitable for seven consecutive quarters, showing strong operational resilience.
As the most important joint venture for General Motors in China, SAIC-GM's performance was also commendable. According to the June production and sales quick report released by SAIC Motor, in the first half of 2026, SAIC-GM's cumulative wholesale sales reached 231,200 units, a year-on-year decline of 5.68%, significantly better than the overall domestic passenger car market decline of 20.2%, and it is one of the mainstream joint venture automakers with the smallest sales decline. This is mainly due to the stable performance of main models such as Buick GL8, Envision family, and new LaCrosse. At the same time, SAIC-GM's new energy business grew rapidly, with sales close to 50,000 units in the first half of the year, up 81.1% year-on-year. Among them, Buick Zhijing E7 launched in April contributed more than 60% of the new energy sales and is becoming a new growth engine.
△ SAIC-GM outperformed the domestic overall car market in the first half of the year
It is worth noting that SAIC-GM may play a more important strategic role in the future. Relying on China's leading advantages in new energy and intelligence, SAIC-GM is gradually transforming from a market and profit contributor in the past to an important output platform for General Motors' global technological innovation. Taking the "Xiao Yao" super integrated architecture equipped with Zhijing E7 as an example, General Motors has already upgraded its battery wireless management system and thermal runaway protection standards to global safety standards for mid-level models. In early 2026, Buick and Chevrolet new energy models built on this architecture have entered the Mexican, Thai, and Brazilian markets in CKD form, with core three-electric systems and intelligent control modules supplied by Chinese factories. In the future, General Motors also plans to apply the "Xiao Yao" architecture's smart cockpit and intelligent driving underlying technology to mid-size pure electric SUVs in the North American market by 2027.
△ SAIC-GM is gradually transforming into an important output platform for General Motors' global technological innovation
Foreign automakers have not lost competitiveness
General Motors' financial report shows that in the new energy vehicle era, although multinational automakers face huge challenges, they have not truly lost competitiveness, and their operating concepts and system capabilities are still worth reference for Chinese automakers.
First, shifting from scale competition to profit competition. Compared to many domestic automakers that still view sales and market share as the primary goal, General Motors focuses more on profitability and shareholder returns. Relying on high-profit pickups, large SUVs, and Cadillac products, General Motors has built a mature product structure and brand premium system. Even though sales are no longer at the top globally, it can still maintain high per-car profits and ample cash flow. This also shows that for automotive enterprises, true competition is not just about selling more cars, but selling more valuable and more profitable cars.
△ Even though sales are no longer at the top globally, General Motors can still maintain high per-car profits and ample cash flow
Second, building long-term competitiveness, rather than pursuing short-term explosions. General Motors' century-long development history shows that an enterprise's core competitiveness comes not only from the products themselves but also from brand accumulation, global operation systems, and continuous operating capabilities. From R&D, procurement, and manufacturing to quality management and compliance governance, mature system capabilities allow enterprises to have resilience across industry cycles. As Chinese automakers accelerate their global layout, these "soft powers" will also become an important foundation for building world-class automotive groups.
△ Chinese automakers need to compete with multinational automaker giants like General Motors in the long term
Finally, multinational automakers still have certain competitive advantages. Currently, Chinese automakers have established a leading advantage with new energy and intelligence, but the global automotive industry's competitive landscape is far from settled. General Motors, Toyota, Volkswagen, and other multinational automakers still possess strong financial strength, global brand influence, mature manufacturing systems, and stable profitability; once they make breakthroughs in key technologies such as electrification and intelligent driving and form synergy with their own global operation capabilities, they still have the potential to reshape competitive advantages. In the future, competition in the global automotive industry is more likely to be a long-term game between Chinese automakers' innovation advantages and multinational automakers' system advantages, rather than a simple "who replaces who".
Commentary
In the new energy vehicle era, competition is already not just about sales, but a comprehensive test of profitability, system capability, and globalization capability. Chinese automakers are redefining technological innovation, while multinational automakers still possess deep brand accumulation, operating experience, and financial strength. In the future, competition in the global automotive industry will not be a simple "new forces replacing old giants," but more likely a long-term race between innovation advantages and operational advantages.
(This article is original to Heyan Yueche, unauthorized reprinting is prohibited)
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Honda CR-V when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The Honda CR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 178,200 - 195,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200), etc.
From a price perspective, the Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 88,400 cheaper than the Honda CR-V. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the savings of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Honda CR-V is equipped with a 2.0L 4-cyl, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Honda CR-V's 2.0L 4-cyl has 65 more horsepower than the Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power and won't feel underpowered.
Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Honda CR-V safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New cars nowadays generally have good safety, so no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Honda CR-V body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, the Honda CR-V body is 100 mm longer than the Proton X50, giving it an advantage in passenger space. However, the Proton X50 is more flexible for parking in the city, each has its trade-offs.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda CR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, both Proton X50 and Honda CR-V are quite good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and going for a test drive before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Mazda CX-8 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300. There are 4 versions in total, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of Mazda CX-8 in Malaysia is RM 165,360 - 201,360. There are 5 versions in total, including 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol (RM 201,360), 2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel (RM 193,123), 2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol (RM 186,360), etc.
In terms of price, Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 75,560 cheaper than Mazda CX-8. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the few thousand dollars cheaper might involve trade-offs in equipment, which depends on your specific needs.
Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cylinder engine, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-8 is equipped with a 2.0L 4-cylinder engine, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption is 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Mazda CX-8's 2.0L 4-cyl has 65 more horsepower than the Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power and won't feel underpowered.
Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-8 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Brand ADAS.
Both cars have the same safety rating; safety features are quite comprehensive for this class. New cars nowadays generally have good safety, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X50 adopts 4WD drive configuration.
Mazda CX-8 adopts FWD drive configuration.
Proton's 4WD and Mazda's FWD will feel different in handling; a test drive comparison is recommended.
Proton X50 and Mazda CX-8 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about price-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both; experiencing it personally is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and Mazda CX-8 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter; spending time on research will never go wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會用 Proton X70 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾相近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300）等。
Toyota Yaris Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 99,900 - 109,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Standard（RM 99,900）、2026 HEV 1.5L Standard（RM 109,900）等。
從價錢嚟睇，Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅起步價比 Proton X70 平咗 RM 6,900。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵始終係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Proton X70 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Toyota Yaris Cross 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Proton X70 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力，中段加速更有信心，尤其係行高速超車嗰陣。不過 Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅油耗可能更抵，日常市區通勤分別唔會太大。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 TSS。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別裡面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔錯，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Toyota Yaris Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會太大分別。
Proton X70 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更介意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終始終建議兩款都去試駕，親自體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，Proton X70 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵始終都要睇你個人嘅需求同預算。建議大家做功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係一件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
Dalam pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli membandingkan Proton X50 dan Subaru Forester semasa memilih kereta. Kedua-dua model ini mempunyai harga dan pasaran sasaran yang agak hampir. Hari ini kita akan melakukan perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa melakukan kajian.
Harga OTR Proton X50 di Malaysia adalah RM 89,800 - 113,300, terdapat 4 varian, termasuk 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Subaru Forester di Malaysia adalah RM 174,000 - 197,000, terdapat 3 varian, termasuk 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition (RM 189,538), 2024 2.0L S EyeSight (RM 177,538), 2024 2.0L L EyeSight (RM 167,538) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X50 memang lebih murah RM 84,200 berbanding Subaru Forester. Jika bajet anda terhad, varian masuk Proton sudah boleh memenuh keperluan harian. Namun perlu diingat, berapapun perbezaan harga yang kecil mungkin melibatkan kompromi pada kelengkapan, lihat keperluan anda sendiri.
Penarafan keselamatan Proton X50 adalah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Penarafan keselamatan Subaru Forester adalah 5★ (Euro NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk EyeSight.
Dari segi kelengkapan keselamatan, kedua-dua kereta mendapat penarafan yang baik. Namun ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) Proton X50 dan EyeSight Subaru Forester mempunyai perbezaan fungsi. Jika anda lebih mengutamakan keselamatan aktif, bandingkan senarai fungsi kedua-duanya secara teliti.
Proton X50 panjang kenderaan 4400 mm, kapasiti bagasi 400 L.
Subaru Forester panjang kenderaan 4400 mm, kapasiti bagasi 400 L.
Saiz kedua-dua kereta hampir sama, ruang dalaman tidak banyak berbeza. Untuk kereta kelas ini, cukup untuk kegunaan harian.
Proton X50 dan Subaru Forester kedua-duanya pilihan utama pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga dan perjalanan harian. Jika anda lebih mengutamakan reputasi jenama dan harga jualan semula, utamakan yang memiliki reputasi lebih baik; jika anda lebih menekankan nilai dan kelengkapan, pilih yang mempunyai konfigurasi lebih kaya. Akhir sekali, disyorkan untuk kedua-duanya dicuba diuji, pengalaman peribadi adalah yang paling penting.
Secara keseluruhannya, Proton X50 dan Subaru Forester kedua-duanya model kereta yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih mana satu, kunci utama bergantung pada keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Disarankan untuk membuat kajian, membandingkan beberapa pengedar kereta, kemudian buat ujian memandu untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah urusan penting, meluangkan masa membuat kajian tidak akan salah.
在马来西亚的汽车市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Mercedes-Benz GLE 和 Land Rover Discovery Sport 来做比较。今天我们从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Mercedes-Benz GLE 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 544,888 - 544,888，一共有 1 个版本，包括 Standard（RM 544,888） 等。
Land Rover Discovery Sport 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 499,800 - 499,800，一共有 1 个版本，包括 Standard（RM 499,800） 等。
从价钱来看，Land Rover Discovery Sport 的起步价比 Mercedes-Benz GLE 便宜了 RM 45,088。老实讲，在这个价位段，几千块的差距其实不算大，关键还是看整体的性价比和长期使用成本。
Mercedes-Benz GLE 的安全评级是 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Premium ADAS。
Land Rover Discovery Sport 的安全评级是 TBD，主动安全系统包括 Basic。
安全配备方面，两款车都拿到了不错的评级。不过 Mercedes-Benz GLE 的 Premium ADAS 和 Land Rover Discovery Sport 的 Basic 在功能上有些差异，如果你比较看重主动安全的话，可以仔细对比一下两者的功能列表。
Mercedes-Benz GLE 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Land Rover Discovery Sport 采用 4WD 驱动方式。
Mercedes-Benz GLE 的 FWD 和 Land Rover Discovery Sport 的 4WD 在操控上会有不同感受，建议试驾对比。
Mercedes-Benz GLE 保修 3年/100,000km，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
Land Rover Discovery Sport 保修 3年/100,000km，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
两款车的保修条件一样，这方面不用纠结。实际保养成本还要看品牌的服务网络和零件价格，建议去车友群问问真实车主的经验。
总的来说，Mercedes-Benz GLE 和 Land Rover Discovery Sport 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
在马来西亚的SUV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Mercedes-Benz GLC 和 Land Rover Discovery Sport 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Mercedes-Benz GLC 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 336,888 - 336,888，一共有 2 个版本，包括 GLC 200（RM 290,000）、GLC 300（RM 340,000） 等。
Land Rover Discovery Sport 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 499,800 - 499,800，一共有 1 个版本，包括 Standard（RM 499,800） 等。
从价钱来看，Mercedes-Benz GLC 的起步价确实比 Land Rover Discovery Sport 便宜了 RM 162,912。如果你预算有限，Mercedes-Benz 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意，便宜的那几千块，可能在配备上会有取舍，具体要看你的需求。
Mercedes-Benz GLC 搭载 2.0L Turbo，马力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
Land Rover Discovery Sport 搭载 3.0L Turbo，马力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
动力方面，Land Rover Discovery Sport 的 3.0L Turbo 比 Mercedes-Benz GLC 的 2.0L Turbo 多了 130 匹马力。不过日常在市区开，两款车的动力都够用，不会觉得不够力。
Mercedes-Benz GLC 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
Land Rover Discovery Sport 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
两款车的尺寸几乎一样，车内空间差别不大。这个级别的车，日常使用完全够用。
Mercedes-Benz GLC 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Land Rover Discovery Sport 采用 4WD 驱动方式。
Mercedes-Benz 的 FWD 和 Land Rover 的 4WD 在操控上会有不同感受，建议试驾对比。
总的来说，Mercedes-Benz GLC 和 Land Rover Discovery Sport 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
Dalam pasaran SUV Malaysia, ramai pembeli membandingkan Proton X50 dan Chery Tiggo 8 ketika memilih kereta. Kedua-dua model ini mempunyai julat harga dan posisi pasaran yang agak hampir. Hari ini, kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Harga OTR Proton X50 di Malaysia adalah RM 89,800 hingga 113,300. Terdapat 4 varian, termasuk 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Chery Tiggo 8 di Malaysia adalah RM 129,750 hingga 129,750. Terdapat 1 varian, termasuk 2026 1.6T Standard (RM 129,750) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X50 memang lebih murah RM 39,950 berbanding Chery Tiggo 8. Jika bajet anda terhad, varian pengenalan Proton sudah cukup memenuhi keperluan harian. Namun, perlu diingat, perbezaan harga beberapa ribu itu mungkin mempunyai kompromi pada kelengkapan, bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Penilaian keselamatan Proton X50 ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Penilaian keselamatan Chery Tiggo 8 ialah TBD, sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk Basic.
Dari segi kelengkapan keselamatan, kedua-dua kereta mendapat penilaian yang baik. Namun, ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) pada Proton X50 dan Basic pada Chery Tiggo 8 mempunyai perbezaan pada fungsinya. Jika anda lebih mementingkan keselamatan aktif, bolehlah bandingkan senarai fungsi kedua-duanya.
Proton X50 menggunakan sistem penggerak 4WD.
Chery Tiggo 8 menggunakan sistem penggerak FWD.
Pengalaman pengendalian 4WD Proton dan FWD Chery akan berbeza. Disarankan untuk membandingkan melalui sesi ujian pemanduan.
Proton X50 mempunyai waranti 5 tahun/150,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Chery Tiggo 8 mempunyai waranti 3 tahun/100,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Proton X50 dan Chery Tiggo 8 merupakan pilihan utama dalam pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga dan perjalanan harian. Jika anda lebih mementingkan reputasi jenama dan nilai jualan semula, boleh mempertimbangkan model yang mempunyai reputasi lebih baik. Jika anda lebih mementingkan nilai untuk wang dan kelengkapan, pilihlah model dengan konfigurasi lebih lengkap. Akhir sekali, disarankan untuk menguji kedua-dua model, pengalaman sendiri adalah yang paling penting.
Secara keseluruhannya, Proton X50 dan Chery Tiggo 8 adalah model yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih mana satu, kuncinya bergantung pada keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Kami menyarankan anda membuat kajian, membandingkan beberapa tawaran harga daripada kedai kereta, kemudian buat ujian pemanduan untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa membuat kajian adalah langkah yang tepat.
7 月 16 日，廣汽集團 3000 萬用戶感恩盛典喺廣汽傳祺工廠舉辦，政企領導、行業夥伴、海內外車主同媒體共同見證集團第 3000 萬輛整車下線呢一個關鍵里程碑。經歷 29 年發展，3000 萬整車交付，既係千萬用戶信任嘅見證，亦係中國汽車產業由規模擴張轉向高質量發展嘅縮影。
活動現場全球基地連線，廣汽本田、豐田、埃安、昊鉑、啟境多款新能源車款依次完成第 29999995 至 29999999 台下線，壓軸第 3000 萬輛為右舵版傳祺 M8 PHEV，新車鑰匙現場交付泰國車主，直觀展現廣汽新能源轉型與全球化出海雙線成果。
市場數據印證轉型成效，今年上半年廣汽累計銷售 77.31 萬輛，同比增長 2.35%；新能源銷量大漲 68.8%，海外出口 12 萬輛，增幅 132%，喺行業調整週期保持穩健增長。
品質係廣汽發展核心底線。集團融合日系成熟管理體系打造專屬質量管理模式，新車統一通過“五高一山一塵”極端環境同兩冬一夏長週期測試，依托埃安全球新能源燈塔工廠實現數位化品控。安全層面，星靈守護體系、彈匣電池落地應用，累計規避數百萬次行車風險；行業首創“三擔責”政策，為電池、智駕相關問題主動兜底，打消用戶用車顧慮。
據介紹，廣汽常態化開展用戶面對面溝通，堅持用戶中心導向，搭建全閉環訴求處理機制。渠道持續下沉，年內新增千家縣域門店，上線 5 秒響應極速管家服務。建成覆蓋全國嘅“9 縱 10 橫”補能網絡，自營超過兩萬根超充樁，完善新能源用車配套。現場同步開啟全品牌煥新感恩季，六大乘用車品牌推出購車、置換多重回饋政策。
以 3000 萬為全新起點，廣汽持續加碼自研創新，累計研發投入超過 620 億元，研發團隊 6800 餘人。星源動力系列動力方案、夸克高效電驅、全固態電池中試線、進化版星靈電子電氣架構陸續落地，聯合華為、寧德時代等企業共建 AI 智能生態，持續攻克快充、低溫續航等行業痛點。
未來廣汽將堅守品質、用戶、技術、全球化四大主線，加速向生態型科技企業轉型，持續輸出綠色智能產品，開拓全球市場。
小編總結：整車產銷突破 3000 萬，係廣汽近三十年製造、渠道、技術積累嘅集中體現。同時企業並未只側重產品迭代，從極端工況測試、電池安全兜底，到縣域渠道、全國補能網絡、極速用戶服務，形成完整用戶保障體系。值得其他車企學習借鑒。
Di pasaran SUV Malaysia, ramai pembeli membandingkan Perodua Aruz dan Proton X90 apabila memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kereta ini mempunyai harga dan kedudukan yang agak hampir. Hari ini kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Perodua Aruz dijual pada harga OTR di Malaysia antara RM 72,900 - 77,900. Terdapat 2 varian, termasuk 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900) dan lain-lain.
Proton X90 dijual pada harga OTR di Malaysia antara RM 106,800 - 122,800. Terdapat 4 varian, termasuk 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Perodua Aruz memang RM 33,900 lebih murah berbanding Proton X90. Jika bajet anda terhad, versi permulaan Perodua sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Namun, perlu diingat, perbezaan harga beberapa ribu itu mungkin melibatkan pengorbanan dalam peralatan, bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Penilaian keselamatan Perodua Aruz ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk.
Penilaian keselamatan Proton X90 ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Kedua-dua kereta mempunyai penilaian keselamatan yang sama. Pada tahap ini, peralatan keselamatan sudah dianggap cukup lengkap. Keselamatan kereta baru masa kini tidak kurang baik, tiada perlu terlalu risau mengenai hal ini.
Perodua Aruz menggunakan cara pemanduan FWD.
Proton X90 menggunakan cara pemanduan FWD.
Cara pemanduan kedua-dua kereta sama, iaitu FWD. Pengalaman memandu harian tidak akan banyak berbeza.
Perodua Aruz mempunyai jaminan 5 tahun/150,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Proton X90 mempunyai jaminan 5 tahun/150,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Syarat jaminan kedua-dua kereta sama, tiada perlu berbimbang mengenai hal ini. Kos penyelenggaraan sebenar bergantung pada rangkaian perkhidmatan jenama dan harga komponen. Disarankan bertanya pengalaman pemilik sebenar dalam komuniti pemilik kereta.
Secara keseluruhan, Perodua Aruz dan Proton X90 adalah model kereta yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana, kunci utamanya adalah melihat keperluan dan bajet anda sendiri. Disarankan membuat kajian yang rapi, membandingkan sebut harga dari beberapa dealer kereta, kemudian uji pandu untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara penting, meluangkan masa membuat kajian tidak akan salah.
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare the Perodua Ativa and Proton X50 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Perodua Ativa in Malaysia is RM 62,500 - 73,400, with a total of 3 variants, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400), etc.
The OTR price of the Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 variants, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
From a pricing perspective, the starting price of the Perodua Ativa is indeed RM 27,300 cheaper than the Proton X50. If your budget is limited, the Perodua entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware that the savings of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.
The safety rating of the Perodua Ativa is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA.
The safety rating of the Proton X50 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New cars nowadays are not lacking in safety, no need to worry too much about this.
The Perodua Ativa adopts FWD drive system.
The Proton X50 adopts 4WD drive system.
Perodua's FWD and Proton's 4WD will have different handling experiences, test drive comparison is recommended.
Both the Perodua Ativa and Proton X50 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both models, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, the Perodua Ativa and Proton X50 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, comparing quotes from several car dealers, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will never be wrong.
Dalam pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli ketika memilih kereta akan membandingkan Perodua Ativa dan Proton X70. Kedua-dua kereta ini mempunyai tahap harga dan kedudukan yang hampir sama, hari ini kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek, membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Perodua Ativa di Malaysia harga OTR adalah RM 62,500 - 73,400, terdapat 3 varian, termasuk 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400) dan lain-lain.
Proton X70 di Malaysia harga OTR adalah RM 106,800 - 122,300, terdapat 3 varian, termasuk 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Perodua Ativa memang lebih murah RM 44,300 berbanding Proton X70. Jika bajet anda terhad, model asas Perodua sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Namun perlu diingat, beberapa ribu ringgit yang lebih murah itu mungkin ada kompromi pada kelengkapan, bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Perodua Ativa dilengkapi dengan 1.5L 4-cyl, kuasa 105 hp. Konsumsi minyak rasmi 6.0 L/100km.
Proton X70 dilengkapi dengan 1.5L Turbo, kuasa 140 hp. Konsumsi minyak rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Dari segi kuasa, 1.5L Turbo Proton X70 mempunyai 35 hp lebih daripada 1.5L 4-cyl Perodua Ativa. Namun, untuk pemanduan harian di dalam bandar, kedua-dua kereta ini mempunyai kuasa yang mencukupi, tidak akan berasa kurang tenaga.
Penarafan keselamatan Perodua Ativa ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA.
Penarafan keselamatan Proton X70 ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Kedua-dua kereta mempunyai penarafan keselamatan yang sama, kelengkapan keselamatan dalam tahap ini dianggap sangat lengkap. Keselamatan kereta baharu sekarang tidak buruk, tidak perlu terlalu risau mengenai hal ini.
Perodua Ativa panjang kenderaan 4400 mm, kapasiti bagasi 400 L.
Proton X70 panjang kenderaan 4400 mm, kapasiti bagasi 400 L.
Dimensi kedua-dua kereta hampir sama, ruang dalam kenderaan tidak banyak beza. Kereta dalam tahap ini, penggunaan harian sudah memadai sepenuhnya.
Perodua Ativa dan Proton X70 adalah pilihan utama pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga dan perjalanan kerja harian. Jika anda lebih menitikberatkan reputasi jenama dan harga jual semula, anda boleh memilih terlebih dahulu yang mempunyai reputasi lebih baik; jika anda lebih menitikberatkan nilai harga dan kelengkapan, pilihlah yang mempunyai kelengkapan lebih banyak. Pada akhirnya, disarankan untuk mencuba kedua-dua kereta tersebut, pengalaman sendiri adalah yang paling penting.
Secara keseluruhan, Perodua Ativa dan Proton X70 adalah model yang sangat bagus di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih mana satu, terasnya bergantung pada keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Kami mengesyorkan anda melakukan penyelidikan, membandingkan tawaran harga dari beberapa dealer kereta, kemudian mencuba untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa untuk penyelidikan pasti tidak akan salah.
© 2024 Bitauto.com. All Rights Reserved.
Bitauto (www.yiche.com and www.bitauto.com) is one of the most visited automotive websites in China. We provide detailed info on Chinese car brands available in your area. Please note that the information provided on this website is based on publicly available data and is for reference only. It may not be fully updated or accurate at all times.
Help us improve our website
