HomeHonda CRX
Search History
Popular Searches
Dealer Login / Sign Up
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Honda CR-V 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Honda CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 178,200 - 195,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS（RM 195,900）、2026 1.5T 4WD V（RM 181,900）、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E（RM 178,200）等。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,750 - 129,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 1.5T 90km CSH（RM 129,750）、Tiggo 7 PHEV 支援邊種充電方法？可唔可以喺家用電源插座充電？（RM 117,478）等。
由價錢睇，Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅起步價比 Honda CR-V 平咗 RM 48,450。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同埋長期使用成本。
Honda CR-V 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 搭載 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
動力方面，Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅 Hybrid 比 Honda CR-V 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 多咗 0 匹馬力。唔過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Honda CR-V 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Honda CR-V 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Honda CR-V 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同埋二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總嘅嚟講，Honda CR-V 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
近日，上汽通用五菱完成了一次引人关注的高层人事调整。原党委副书记、副总经理韩德鸿正式接替姚佐平出任公司党委书记，同时继续担任副总经理职务。这位年仅44岁的“80后”高管，由此完成了从“副书记”到“正书记”的关键跨越。
此次调整的另一面是姚佐平的退居二线。姚佐平1964年5月出生，已满62周岁，超过法定退休年龄。调整后，他转任上汽通用五菱总经理顾问、智能岛制造体系技术委员会主任，不再具体负责经营事务，逐步向退休过渡。
值得注意的是，韩德鸿已经为上汽通用五菱效力超过二十年，是一位拥有丰富“出海”经验的老将。根据履历显示，韩德鸿2005年入上汽通用五菱，2010年左右被派往印度，担任印度合资公司总经理助理，参与开拓印度市场。当时的直接领导正是姚佐平。
回国后，韩德鸿先后担任上汽通用五菱行政与公共关系总监、销售公司副总经理等职务。2016年6月，34岁的他升任销售公司副总经理，2019年新宝骏品牌发布后转任新宝骏销售公司副总经理、品牌传播总监，在品牌建设方面积累了丰富经验。
2021年，韩德鸿再次赴海外任职，担任上汽通用五菱印尼分公司总经理助理，后升任印尼汽车有限公司副总经理。这段经历进一步夯实了他在海外市场的管理能力。回到总部后，他先后担任党委副书记、总经理助理，并于2024年9月开始以副总经理身份公开露面。
韩德鸿的履历放在当前中国汽车产业的大背景下，这次人事布局的深意不言自明。当国内市场陷入极度内卷、各大车企纷纷将出海视为“第二增长曲线”之际，一位拥有丰富海外市场经验的年轻领导者走上核心岗位，无疑是上汽通用五菱为下一阶段战略转型投下的关键一子。
中国汽车产业正经历一场前所未有的出海浪潮。据中汽协数据显示，2026年8月我国汽车出口达101万辆，同比增长65.3%，这已是中国汽车出口量连续三个月超过100万辆。乘联分会负责人崔东树预测，2026年全年汽车出口有望达到1150万至1200万辆。
更值得关注的是，新能源汽车已成为出口的绝对主力，出口占比连续三个月超过50%。这意味着中国汽车产业的全球化，不再是以往“低价走量”的初级模式，而是以技术、品牌、智能化能力为核心的高质量出海。
然而，出海之路并非坦途。商务部、工信部、市场监管总局近日联合发布的《汽车行业境外竞争行为与合规建设指引》明确指出，部分中国车企在海外市场存在竞争失序风险，把国内价格竞争的逻辑简单复制到海外，不仅损害自身品牌价值，还会拉低全球市场对中国汽车的整体认知。这提示我们：真正的全球化能力，远比出口规模的增长更为复杂和艰巨。
在这一波出海浪潮中，上汽通用五菱表现抢眼。截至2026年8月，企业海外市场累计销量已正式突破160万辆大关，产品销往全球110余个国家和地区。今年1至8月，五菱出口连续5个月单月超3万辆，海外业务已成为品牌增长的重要引擎。
当前中国汽车出海正从“产品出海”向“品牌出海”升级，从简单的贸易出口向本地化运营转变。上汽通用五菱的海外战略同样在经历这一转型，依托“印马泰”一体化战略及三大品牌渠道布局，企业正加速从“产品出海”向“品牌出海”升级。
在这一关键节点，韩德鸿兼具销售、品牌、海外市场等多重经验，且有着从基层成长起来的实干背景，无疑是推动这一战略转型的合适人选。他对海外市场的深刻理解，将帮助企业在全球化进程中更好地应对关税、合规、本地化、供应链安全等复杂挑战。
从更宏观的视角看，上汽通用五菱此次人事调整也体现了企业对年轻化管理人才的重视和培养。韩德鸿从基层员工成长为党委书记，既是个人能力的体现，也反映出企业在人才梯队建设上的战略布局。
出海是一场马拉松，而非短跑。韩德鸿和他的团队面临的挑战才刚刚开始。但至少从人事布局来看，上汽通用五菱已经为这场长跑做好了准备。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-30 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, let's make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Honda CR-V in Malaysia is RM 178,200 - 195,900, with a total of 4 variants, including 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200), etc.
The OTR price of Mazda CX-30 in Malaysia is RM 122,409 - 146,409, with a total of 4 variants, including 2025 2.0L High+ Premium (RM 146,409), 2025 2.0L High+ (RM 138,409), 2025 2.0L High (RM 130,409), etc.
Looking at the price, the Mazda CX-30's starting price is RM 55,791 cheaper than the Honda CR-V. To be honest, in this price segment, a difference of a few thousand isn't significant; the key lies in overall value for money and long-term usage costs.
Honda CR-V's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Mazda CX-30's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include i-Activsense.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive for this class. New cars nowadays have good safety standards, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Honda CR-V body length is 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
Mazda CX-30 body length is 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
Both cars have almost the same dimensions, and interior space difference is not significant. For this class of cars, it is fully sufficient for daily use.
Honda CR-V uses FWD drive mode.
Mazda CX-30 uses FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, so there won't be much difference in daily driving experience.
In general, both Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-30 are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, and test drive before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter; spending some time on research will definitely not be wrong.
9月9日下午，国际原油价格再度爆发，布伦特原油突破每桶100美元关口。与此同时，天然橡胶直逼2万元大关，炭黑逼近“万元时代”。原材料全线上涨之下，中策、佳通、万力、浦林成山等约30家轮胎企业接连发布涨价函，行业年内第三轮涨价潮汹涌而来。
油价破百，供应缺口扩大
截至发稿，布伦特和纽约原油双双上涨，布伦特年内累计涨幅超60%。中东局势持续升级是直接推手：美军摧毁5艘载有原油的伊朗油轮，沙特多处能源设施遭胡塞武装袭击。Rystad Energy数据显示，霍尔木兹海峡每日原油运输量已从战事重燃前的800万—900万桶骤降至200万桶以下；IEA预计今年全球石油供应每日减少430万桶，降幅约4%。
高盛、美国银行、汇丰等机构纷纷上调油价预测，高盛警告若局势进一步升级，油价或涨至120美元/桶。9月11日24时国内油价将迎来调价窗口，据金联创测算，汽柴油零售价应上调260元/吨。
橡胶、炭黑双线冲高
橡胶市场同步飙升。9月9日收盘，上期所天然橡胶主连报19770元/吨，距2万元大关仅一步之遥；此前一天，20号胶主力刷新上市以来纪录，合成橡胶单日涨4.59%，橡胶系“三兄弟”集体冲高。
炭黑涨势更为凶猛。其上游煤焦油拍卖成交价较上周同期涨近1500元，逼近历史高点；N220市场价约9628元/吨，同比涨近36%，N330单日涨幅曾达550元，市场关于炭黑“万元时代”的讨论迅速升温。煤焦油占炭黑成本约70%-80%，炭黑又占轮胎成本约15%，涨价正沿产业链逐级传导。
卓创资讯数据显示，与一个月前相比，混合胶、丁苯橡胶、顺丁橡胶、炭黑N330分别上涨8.75%、16.67%、20.65%、16.89%——四大核心原料全线暴涨。国泰君安期货分析师指出，油价推升丁二烯、供应收缩、泰国割胶受阻叠加厄尔尼诺减产预期、产业链涨价氛围强化，构成三重驱动。
30企集体宣涨，年内第三轮涨价潮
成本重压之下，涨价函密集落地：
中策橡胶自9月15日起全钢工程胎上浮3%-5%，10月1日起其余非公路产品上浮3%；佳通自9月27日起，替换市场所有品牌产品整体上调2%-4%；万力自9月23日起，国内半钢胎部分产品上调3%-5%，不排除后续继续调价；浦林成山自9月26日起，替换市场全钢胎、斜交胎整体上调3%。方兴橡胶、威海橡胶、建新橡胶等也相继跟进。
据不完全统计，8月下旬以来，风神、三角、正新、玛吉斯等超20家企业已发布调价通知，本轮调价企业总数达30家左右，主流涨幅2%-5%。
In the Malaysia SUV market, many buyers compare Honda HR-V and Hyundai Tucson when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price for Honda HR-V in Malaysia is RM 115,900 - 143,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.
The OTR price for Hyundai Tucson in Malaysia is RM 143,888 - 197,888, with a total of 5 versions, including 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige (RM 197,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige (RM 186,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime (RM 164,888), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Honda HR-V is indeed RM 27,988 cheaper than Hyundai Tucson. If your budget is limited, Honda's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note, the cheaper few thousand might have compromises on equipment, depends on your needs.
Honda HR-V is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Hyundai Tucson is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, the driving feel is basically the same in daily use. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this.
Honda HR-V safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Hyundai Tucson safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include SmartSense.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite complete in this class. New car safety now is not bad, no need to worry too much about this.
Honda HR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.
Hyundai Tucson warranty 5 years/300,000 km, maintenance interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.
Honda HR-V and Hyundai Tucson are both mainstream choices in the Malaysia market, suitable for family use, daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and equipment, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Honda HR-V and Hyundai Tucson are both very good car models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do research, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big thing, spending time doing research is never wrong.
Autonomous driving that has been burning cash for over a decade is showing an uncommon signal.
A company that still allocates over 70% of its revenue to R&D is approaching operational break-even.
Momenta's first semi-annual report after listing shows that in the first half of this year, the company's revenue was 1.601 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 76%; the adjusted net loss was only 14.097 million yuan, narrowing by 96.6% year-on-year.
More notably, this was not achieved by cutting R&D.
Momenta's R&D investment reached 1.163 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 18.7%, with revenue growth being four times the R&D growth rate.
Profitability for Robotaxi still needs to be waited for in years, but Momenta seems to be sprinting. At the performance meeting, Momenta Executive Director and Chief of Staff An Ren broke the **myth that 'Autonomous driving is naturally a continuous money burner'**.
If continuous burning of cash is not the fate of autonomous driving, then what is this new path Momenta found?
01. Autonomous Driving Begins to Become a Scalable Business for the First Time
When everyone is pursuing full autonomy in autonomous driving, Momenta is actually solving another more fundamental problem: how can autonomous driving first become a scalable software business.
In 2016, L4 autonomous driving was in the peak of its success, Robotaxi was the hottest story in the capital market, but Momenta simultaneously chose the less sexy L2 mass production route.
And this less sexy path of L2 mass production laid the foundation for three key chips: **an entry point into more vehicle models, real-world data, and engineering skills polished through continuous adaptation**.
Autonomous driving is not pure software. It must enter cars, experience different vehicle models, sensors, computing platforms, and body control, and also face regulations, road conditions, and safety verification standards in different markets.
Every layer of adaptation involves real engineering investment.
The true difficulty lies here: the scaling of autonomous driving requires 'repeated adaptation'. How to turn a technology that relies heavily on engineering adaptation into a product that can be continuously replicated.
At the end of the competition in autonomous driving, it is no longer about the intensity of algorithms, but about **who can replicate the technology to enough cars**.
And Momenta recognized early on that **both mass production auxiliary driving and unmanned driving walk on two legs**:
Engineering standardization allows technical capabilities to be replicated across different vehicle models.
From securing Mercedes-Benz investment in 2017 to the mass production of the first project by the end of 2025, the mass production scale and engineering system buried for ten years begin to change the growth formula of autonomous driving today.
Resources needed to deliver one vehicle project were compressed from 400 people working for two years in the early stage to dozens of people in three months.
Building a set of replicable engineering capabilities lays the foundation for a scaled business.
The strategy of 'Blanket Coverage' is not a tactic of 'signing more clients', revealing Momenta's operational logic: not betting on a few blockbusters, but covering enough vehicle models.
The underlying logic is the law of large numbers: fluctuations in the sales of a single vehicle model will be diluted by the certainty of the overall scale.
OEMs themselves cannot accurately predict the sales of a single vehicle model. Momenta does not gamble on luck; it spreads the fluctuations by coverage.
In the first half of 2026, Momenta added 49 new designations, meaning an average of more than 8 models per month, cumulative 219. New installations reached 321,000 units, cumulatively breaking through 1 million units.
The first 100,000 units took 24 months, while the latest 100,000 units delivery took only 36 days.
'Blanket Coverage' truly hedges not only the uncertainty of sales of a single vehicle model, but also the uncertainty of autonomous driving commercialization.
For traditional Tier 1 suppliers, selling one more component is one more unit of income.
But for autonomous driving, mass production vehicles are not only a source of income, but also the largest real-world data entry point. Mass production scale brings the breadth, density, and continuity of data to another level.
With enough models, single-vehicle fluctuations are flattened by scale. And the larger the scale, the better the data, income, and R&D efficiency will improve simultaneously.
The essence of 'Blanket Coverage' is **actively turning business scale into technical scale**.
The more models are deployed, the more real data there is, the faster model iteration, and the thicker the technical barrier. Momenta's mass production business has rolled into a self-accelerating flywheel.
Scale is the entry ticket to the autonomous driving table. Standing firm in the scale competition, there is a chance to take the initiative in the 'data-model-commerce' closed loop of autonomous driving.
02. True Profit Comes from 'Replication', Not 'Selling More'
Once scale is built up, profits do not automatically follow.
In the 2026 Chinese automotive market, the price war has reached a white-hot state. From complete vehicles to components, from hardware to software, almost all links are being rolled into the vortex of price cuts.
'Blanket Coverage' sounds like a price war approach, but on the contrary, Momenta did not fall into this pit, but rather increased its own technical value.
Entering a new project, re-adapting different sensors, chips, and body control, was once a headache for intelligent driving suppliers. If adaptation costs cannot be reduced, income cannot roll up.
What truly determines whether an intelligent driving supplier can make money is not how many sets are sold, but how much cost is needed to add a set of new systems. Behind this is the fundamental difference between two business models:
The true threshold of scaling lies in engineering standardization, turning 'start every time' into 'accumulate once'.
After technology becomes platformized, the marginal cost brought by each additional customer continues to decrease, and profits will naturally emerge.
Momenta's revenue is divided into two layers:
Digging wells is getting faster, drinking water is getting more, the structure naturally improves.
In the past three years, the proportion of licensing income has continued to increase, pushing gross margins upward.
After vehicle models are mass-produced, for every car sold, Momenta charges a one-time software licensing fee without needing to invest a large amount of engineering manpower.
Compared to the same period in 2025, although the proportion of software licensing income decreased from 39.8% to 37.9%, the income itself still grew by 67.5%.
The decline in proportion is not a stall in the licensing business, but technical development services grew faster, increasing the proportion by 1.9 percentage points. This means **Momenta's expansion efficiency is improving, locking more vehicle model entry points with lighter investment**.
Supporting efficiency improvement is the R7 World Model. Compared to the previous generation R6, R7 achieved performance improvements of 3 to 5 times in multiple scenarios.
More noteworthy is: it does not require customers to switch hardware. Sensor and chip configurations continue R6, upgrades mainly rely on software and algorithms.
SAIC Volkswagen Flagship SUV ID. ERA 9X, Global Premiere Equipped with Momenta R7 World Model
For an intelligent driving supplier, the most important significance of software upgrades is on the one hand **improving user experience**. Customers who have already used R6 do not need to spend extra hardware money, one OTA exchange can replace several times the experience upgrade.
On the other hand, it is **allowing past R&D investment to continuously generate income and value**. R7 allows hardware to continue releasing value through OTA, and R&D investment is called repeatedly.
R&D results continue to release, users continue to stay on the platform, **the lifetime value of a single set of technology is thus improved, which is the true technical moat**.
Domestic mass production verification tests scaling capabilities, overseas verification tests the generalization capability of technology.
Daily operations can form efficiency advantages through long-term cooperation, supply chain, regulations, and road environments.
But overseas, different countries' roads, regulations, driving habits, and vehicle platforms all change. Whether original technology can be migrated at low cost is the real test.
Overseas business expansion has become Momenta's core growth main line. Vehicle models equipped with Momenta solutions have entered more than 10 countries and regions, including Norway, UK, UAE, Singapore, Australia, New Zealand, Thailand.
Robotaxi business is testing or operating in 3 countries and 6 cities.
Momenta approaching operational break-even is not because it won in a price war.
Under higher intensity R&D investment, delivery efficiency is up, platform reuse is running, revenue growth 76%, R&D growth 18.7%, making every penny of R&D investment leverage more income.
The self-generation logic of autonomous driving is **maximizing the efficiency of R&D investment and making revenue growth continuously outpace investment growth**.
03. When the Scale Flywheel Spins, Autonomous Driving is Not Just Autonomous Driving
If Momenta just wanted to become a more profitable intelligent driving supplier, stopping here is actually enough.
What is truly worth noting is why Momenta continues to put a lot of funds into the world model, Robotaxi, Robovan, and even robots.
The answer may be hidden in the three words 'Scale'.
When mass production vehicles accumulate data, computing power, models, and engineering capabilities to a certain scale, the value of this capability no longer belongs only to cars.
Cao Xudong drew an analogy: realizing autonomous driving is like landing on the moon. Some choose to climb Mount Everest which is closest to the moon, Momenta chooses to build a rocket.
Mass production business is the process of building the rocket; R7 World Model is the engine of this rocket.
The operation of the R7 World Model is based on the closed loop of 'four Scaling':
First layer: **Data Scaling**, more data, model understands the world better.
As of June 2026, over 1 million mass production vehicles are equipped with Momenta solutions, over 13 billion kilometers of real driving mileage, over 100 million segments of 'Golden Data', helping the model understand the operational laws of the physical world more accurately.
Second layer: **Compute Scaling**, more computing power, higher training efficiency.
Momenta's daily over 10 million kilometers of simulation, computing power scale is increasing year by year, models can repeatedly deduce, make mistakes, and optimize in the virtual environment.
Third layer: **Model Scaling**, stronger models, better product experience.
With the growth of data and computing power, the parameter size of the R7 World Model is expanding rapidly, stronger scenario understanding capabilities, more human-like driving behavior, and safer decision-making performance are converted into user-perceivable product experiences.
Fourth layer: **Business Scaling**, more cars, more data.
Data flows to training computing power, computing power feeds models, models get stronger, experience gets better, more vehicle models are willing to place orders, commercial income comes in.
And these new orders of cars on the road become the source of the next round of data. R7 is not an ordinary model, it is a machine that accelerates itself by scale.
If only mass production business is done, R&D investment is expenses, every penny spent, profits get thinner.
But in this model, R&D investment is the fuel of the flywheel, exchanging for the ability to continue rotating and self-accelerating.
Passenger cars, Robotaxi, Robovan, Robotruck, and even future robots can share the same world model foundation.
In the past, R&D investment in autonomous driving was like project costs one by one.
At this stage, **the world model is more like an infrastructure that can be reused across vehicle models and scenarios**, it should not be limited by 'auxiliary driving'.
The break-even path, the core lies in the technical foundation being called repeatedly, the vehicle mounting volume is just a natural result on this road.
Momenta Robovan for scenarios such as express delivery and night delivery
Momenta bets 70% of revenue into R&D, looking not just at immediate profits, but also the larger value space beyond mass production business, promoting from 'ADAS' to a broader physical world.
Robovan is already in trial operation in Suzhou, targeting urban last-mile logistics. Momenta's timeline is also very clear:
Momenta approaching operational break-even is not because it suddenly found the secret to cost reduction and efficiency improvement.
Precisely speaking, **autonomous driving has changed from an expensive technology to an industrial system capable of self-generation and continuous expansion**, the profit inflection point is just a signal that this system starts to turn.
Automotive software may just be the starting point for Momenta to enter physical AI.
If the world model eventually becomes a universal foundation for understanding the physical world, then cars may just be one of its scenarios that are scaled first.
Once real-world data, model capabilities, and mass production scale are ready, the boundaries of business are no longer auxiliary driving, but entering any field that requires understanding the physical world.
In the first half of 2026, the domestic tire industry showed a very obvious stark contrast.
From the latest semi-annual report, it is clearly visible: Leading enterprises that built factories overseas in advance saw their performance rise to new records year after year; small and medium manufacturers that stubbornly stuck to domestic capacity for export were basically passively under pressure and losing market share.
Those Who Go Global Early Enjoy the Dividends
The 2026 semi-annual report data plainly exposed the industry gap: Whether an enterprise can make money and stabilize its overseas market depends on whether its overseas capacity layout is fast and large enough.
Sailun Tyre is a solid benchmark for industry globalization, presenting its best ever half-year performance: Semi-annual revenue broke through 20 billion yuan for the first time, up 13.88% year-on-year; net profit was 2.16 billion yuan, up 17.97% year-on-year. More than 60% of the company's assets are laid out overseas (62.88%), the Vietnam and Cambodia bases continue to produce and earn steadily, forming the core profit backbone. Relying on the linkage of multiple bases in Southeast Asia, the Americas, and Africa, Sailun perfectly avoided trade barriers in Europe and the US, European orders are perpetually in high demand. Even with multiple price adjustments, customer demand remains firm. Over the next three years, there will be a concentrated release of overseas capacity, with strong confidence in growth.
Zhongce Rubber's overseas capacity expansion dividends have also been fully realized. In the first half of 2026, semi-steel tire production at the Thailand base increased by 38% year-on-year, while full-steel tire production at the Indonesia base surged by 249%. After the EU anti-dumping measures took effect, exports for many domestic enterprises were blocked, but Zhongce, relying on normal supply from its overseas bases, not only steadily held the European market but also took over a large volume of spillover orders. Meanwhile, relying on Indonesia capacity to take US orders, it successfully dodged tariff shocks. Currently, the company's new Vietnam base with a 1.04 billion yuan investment is progressing steadily, and the global capacity map is still expanding.
General Shares is a typical representative of benefiting from this round of going global, with performance taking a dramatic turnaround. In the first half of the year, net profit surged 114.84% year-on-year, gross profit margin increased by 3.31 percentage points, and profit quality improved significantly. The company's Thailand and Cambodia dual bases had booming production and sales. Seizing the EU trade policy window, semi-steel tire orders were perpetually in high demand. Overseas non-US market revenue rose steadily, successfully opening up a brand new growth space.
In addition, Zhengdao Tyres stated recently that the Cambodia base went into smooth production, tens of millions level of scaled capacity landed, completely reconstructing its overseas supply chain, and firmly standing in the international market under high barrier pressure.
Comprehensive Encirclement, Traditional Export No Longer Works
The eye-catching performance of leading enterprises is, simply put, the result of early risk avoidance and early planning. Nowadays, trade restrictions in the tire industry are no longer just about single tariffs, but comprehensive suppression including tariffs, dual anti-dumping, origin verification, and green compliance, which completely locks down domestic export paths.
The United States not only maintains high tariffs on Chinese tires but also ferociously investigates the origin in Southeast Asia, completely plugging loopholes for tax avoidance via transshipment; The EU is implementing semi-steel tire anti-dumping and pushing for anti-subsidy investigations, while stacking the EUDR zero-deforestation new regulations, raising entry barriers from tax, environmental, and compliance aspects.
Not only Europe and the US, Brazil, the Eurasian Economic Union, and many other economies are also increasing trade protection, with trade friction sweeping the globe.
On August 31, Canada officially joined the game, launching anti-dumping investigations on Chinese truck and bus tires. At this point, the three major mainstream markets of the US, EU, and Canada have comprehensively encircled, continuously squeezing the space for domestic tire exports, directly ramping up the urgency for enterprises to go global.
Why Must We Go Global Immediately?
Combining the latest financial reports and the global trade situation, there is no longer a need to hesitate about going global. It is necessary to go global as soon as possible and land capacity as soon as possible. This is the only way out for the industry to break through.
First, avoid trade barriers and protect core overseas markets. Now all major global markets are tightening policies. Without local overseas capacity, it is equivalent to directly losing export qualifications. Only by building factories overseas and local production can enterprises avoid anti-dumping tariffs, origin verification, and green compliance restrictions, safeguarding global sales channels.
Second, seize the huge market dividends left vacant by the industry. A large number of small and medium tire enterprises are being forced to exit overseas markets due to export restrictions, causing a significant global supply contraction. Meanwhile, leaders with overseas capacity like Sailun and Zhongce, taking advantage of industry supply gaps, continue to take over spillover orders and increase market share. The barriers instead become expansion opportunities for leaders.
Third, reduce costs and increase efficiency, improving profit advantages. Southeast Asian bases can purchase natural rubber locally, greatly compressing raw material and logistics costs; meanwhile, Vietnam and Thailand belong to CPTPP member countries, bringing tariff advantages. Exporting to Europe, the US, and Southeast Asia offers maximum cost-performance ratio, with profit space much higher than domestic exports.
Finally, widen the industry competition gap. The current industry reshuffle has already reached a fever pitch: Enterprises with overseas capacity continue to make money and expand share; those without overseas capacity can only stick to the domestic market and continue to shrink. In the future competition of the tire industry, the race is no longer about price, but about global capacity layout and supply chain risk resistance.
Overseas Capacity Has Become the Industry's Ultimate Moat
2026 is the decisive year for the globalization of China's tire industry.
Under the global trade pattern of encirclement by multiple countries, the old model of "Domestic Production, Global Export" has officially concluded, and localized production with regional supply has become the only path to break through.
The semi-annual report data has solidly proven: Enterprises that laid out globally in advance are continuously enjoying policy dividends, market dividends, and cost dividends.
In the next phase, industry concentration will continue to rise. Leading enterprises with a perfect global capacity network will continue to reap global market share. The era of globalization for China's tire industry has already fully arrived.
Di pasaran SUV Malaysia, ramai pembeli ketika memilih kereta akan membandingkan Honda HR-V dan Mazda CX-5. Kedua-dua kereta ini hampir sama dari segi harga dan kedudukan, hari ini kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek, membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Honda HR-V di Malaysia berharga OTR RM 115,900 - 143,900, terdapat 4 varien, termasuk 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900) dan lain-lain.
Mazda CX-5 di Malaysia berharga OTR RM 135,469 - 166,760, terdapat 3 varien, termasuk 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary (RM 316,154), 2025 2.0L AT (RM 296,154), 2025 2.0L MT (RM 294,154) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Honda HR-V memang lebih murah RM 19,569 berbanding Mazda CX-5. Jika bajet anda terhad, versi asas Honda sudah cukup untuk keperluan harian. Tetapi perlu diingat, ribuan ringgit yang lebih murah itu, mungkin ada kompromi dari segi kelengkapan, ia bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Honda HR-V dilengkapkan dengan 1.5L Turbo, kuasa 140 hp. Penggunaan minyak rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-5 dilengkapkan dengan 1.5L Turbo, kuasa 140 hp. Penggunaan minyak rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Kedua-dua kereta menggunakan sistem pemacu yang sama, pengalaman memandu harian adalah pada dasarnya sama. Dari segi penggunaan minyak juga hampir sama, tidak perlu terlalu risau mengenai perkara ini.
Gred keselamatan Honda HR-V adalah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Gred keselamatan Mazda CX-5 adalah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk .
Gred keselamatan kedua-dua kereta adalah sama, dalam kelas ini kelengkapan keselamatan dianggap cukup lengkap. Keselamatan kereta baharu sekarang tidak buruk, tidak perlu terlalu bimbang mengenai hal ini.
Panjang badan Honda HR-V adalah 4500 mm, ruang bagasi 450 L.
Panjang badan Mazda CX-5 adalah 4500 mm, ruang bagasi 450 L.
Saiz kedua-dua kereta hampir sama, ruang dalaman hampir tidak ada perbezaan. Kereta dalam kelas ini, untuk penggunaan harian sudah cukup.
Honda HR-V dan Mazda CX-5 kedua-duanya adalah pilihan utama dalam pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga dan perjalanan harian. Jika anda lebih mementingkan reputasi jenama dan harga jualan semula, boleh utamakan model yang mempunyai reputasi lebih baik; jika anda lebih mementingkan nisbah harga-kualiti dan kelengkapan, maka pilih model yang lebih kaya dengan peranti. Pada akhirnya, disarankan untuk menguji memandu kedua-dua model, pengalaman peribadi adalah yang paling penting.
Secara keseluruhan, Honda HR-V dan Mazda CX-5 adalah model yang sangat bagus dalam pasaran Malaysia. Memilih mana satu, kuncinya tetap bergantung pada keperluan peribadi dan bajet anda. Disarankan anda membuat kajian, bandingkan beberapa sebut harga daripada agen kereta yang berbeza, kemudian buat keputusan akhir melalui ujian memandu. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa untuk penyelidikan tidak akan salah.
Di pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli semasa memilih kereta akan membandingkan Honda HR-V dan Mazda CX-5. Kedua-dua kereta ini sangat hampir dari segi harga dan kedudukan, hari ini kita akan buat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek, membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Harga OTR Honda HR-V di Malaysia adalah RM 115,900 - 143,900, terdapat 4 varian, termasuk 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Mazda CX-5 di Malaysia adalah RM 135,469 - 166,760, terdapat 3 varian, termasuk 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary (RM 316,154), 2025 2.0L AT (RM 296,154), 2025 2.0L MT (RM 294,154) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Honda HR-V memang lebih murah RM 19,569 berbanding Mazda CX-5. Jika bajet anda terhad, varian masuk Honda sudah cukup memenuhi keperluan harian. Tetapi perlu diingat, beratus ringgit yang murah itu, mungkin ada kompromi dari segi peralatan, bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Honda HR-V dilengkapi enjin 1.5L Turbo, kuasa 140 hp. Kecekapan bahan api rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-5 dilengkapi enjin 1.5L Turbo, kuasa 140 hp. Kecekapan bahan api rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Kedua-dua kereta menggunakan sistem tenaga yang sama, rasa memandu harian hampir tiada bezanya. Dari segi kecekapan bahan api juga hampir sama, tidak perlu terlalu bimbang tentang perkara ini.
Honda HR-V memiliki waranti 5 tahun/jarak tidak terhad, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Mazda CX-5 memiliki waranti 5 tahun/150,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Honda HR-V dan Mazda CX-5 adalah pilihan utama pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga dan perjalanan harian. Jika anda lebih mengutamakan reputasi jenama dan harga jualan semula, boleh mempertimbangkan yang lebih baik reputasinya; jika anda lebih mementingkan nilai dan peralatan, maka pilih yang lebih lengkap peralatannya. Akhir sekali disarankan kedua-dua unit untuk dicuba test drive, pengalaman langsung adalah yang paling penting.
Secara keseluruhan, Honda HR-V dan Mazda CX-5 adalah model kereta yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih mana satu, kuncinya bergantung pada keperluan peribadi dan bajet anda. Disarankan untuk membuat kajian terlebih dahulu, bandingkan beberapa harga antara dewan jualan kereta, kemudian buat test drive untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa membuat kajian tidak akan salah.
Pasaran SUV tenaga baharu kelas 100,000 masa kini sudah menjadi lautan merah, setiap syarikat automotif besar telah melancarkan 'kenderaan utama' mereka dalam bidang ini, untuk merebut peluang pertama, tidak kurang syarikat automotif telah mempercepatkan kelajuan pelancaran, tetapi isu kualiti yang timbul juga telah menarik perhatian pengguna.
26 Ogos, Chery Fengyun T7 yang digelar 'kereta global' secara rasmi dilancarkan, terdapat tiga model, harga pertukaran lebih awal 94,900 - 115,900, harga ini diletakkan dalam persekitaran pasaran masa kini, impaknya jelas.
Selain harga yang sangat ikhlas, Chery rasmi juga memberikan hak 'dua perlindungan', kegagalan terma bateri terus tebus kereta baru, perlindungan pemanduan pintar tebus sehingga 5 juta, ditambah jaminan seumur hidup keseluruhan kenderaan, perbelanjaan penyelenggaraan asas 666 seumur hidup, secara tidak langsung membuktikan kepercayaan Chery terhadap Fengyun T7.
Sebagai kereta global, Fengyun T7 berbeza dengan kebanyakan model 'dibangun dalam negara kemudian ke luar negara', jalannya adalah 'luar negara dahulu kemudian dalam negara', ia sebelum ini telah dilancarkan di Thailand, Afrika Selatan, seterusnya akan masuk ke Eropah, Australia dan New Zealand.
Sebenarnya sejak awal penyelidikan, Fengyun T7 telah menetapkan piawaian akses pasaran global sebagai asas pembangunan,历经 2 tahun perancangan, 3 tahun pembangunan, melabur 81 unit kenderaan tahan lasak ujian serentak, akhirnya secara kumulatif lengkapkan 1.45 juta kilometer ujian jarak tahan lasak, ini dalam tahap besar elakkan kenderaan kemudian muncul bunyi pelik, penuaan, rangka longgar, tiga sistem elektrik menurun kebarangkalian masalah.
Piawaian global yang ketat, tidak hanya berlegar pada angka jarak ujian. Fengyun T7 menandingi standard keselamatan bintang lima versi 2026 E-NCAP untuk pembangunan arkitektur keseluruhan kenderaan, sembilan melintang lima memanjang rumah kurungan badan, padam tinggi peratusan keluli kuat dan keluli berbentuk panas, dari asas badan yang telah kukuh asas keselamatan. Bateri Litium Besi Fosfat Renjau memiliki perlindungan IP68, menggabungkan risiko pelbagai seperti remuk, tusukan, merosak air, tepat berdasarkan kekuatan perkakasan ini, Chery berani mengeluarkan hak dasar tebus kereta baru kerana gangguan terma bateri berani.
Dilaksanakan pada keseluruhan kenderaan, Fengyun T7 penempatan SUV elektrik kompak, 2700mm gandar membolehkan ruang dalaman yang lapang, ditambah 9 lapisan kerusi rasa awan, pemanasan kerusi, pengudaraan, semakin memastikan keselesaan menaiki keseluruhan kenderaan.
Selain ruang, Fengyun T7 dalam pencapaian kecerdasan sama sekali tidak berkurang, sistem kereta dipasang cip 4nm integrasi kabin dan pemanduan, ditambah 15.6 inci 2.5K skrin kawalan tengah, Lingxi Smart Cockpit 2.0 serta tenaga model besar DouBao, pencapaian kecerdasan keseluruhan kenderaan juga berada pada paras utama.
Sistem pemanduan bantuan menggunakan rancangan Falcon 500, dipadankan dengan 22 sensor, keseluruhan kenderaan sokong NOA pemanduan panduan jalan tinggi, parkir memori serta parkir automatik tiga ratus lebih senario, berhadapan dengan gudang kompleks, ruang parkir sempit dapat siapkan parkir masuk keluar automatik, ini dalam tahap besar kurangkan beban penggunaan kenderaan untuk pemanduan jarak jauh dan parkir harian.
Dari segi tenaga, Fengyun T7 semua model dilengkapi motor kuasa 178 kilowatt, tork puncak 275 Newton-meter, kelajuan tertinggi 180km/h, prestasi tenaga ini diletakkan di kelas 100,000 SUV elektrika telah mencapai paras atas.
Selain tenaga, dari segi jarak keseluruhan kenderaan, Fengyun T7 juga tidak membezakan tinggi rendah, semua model semua dilengkapi kapasiti 65.05kWh kumpulan bateri Litium Besi Fosfat, jarak suci 600km, 30%-80% cepat cas hanya 20 minit, Fengyun T7 benar-benar lakukan kesamaan jarak, memecah kesilapan industri model tahap yang 'rendah spesifikasi menyusut, tinggi spesifikasi sahaja ada jarak jauh', malah pengguna peringkat masuk, juga dapat menikmati kekuatan jarak penuh.
Sertanya, bergantung pada sisa menjimatkan tenaga merentas kawasan, Fengyun T7 semua model standard dilengkapi AGS gril pintar, dua sumber udara panas suhu luas + PTC tekanan tinggi, boleh berjalan stabil di -30°—55° suhu luas luar biasa, walaupun di -10° persekitaran jarak masih boleh meningkat 15%-20%, sama ada musim sejuk utara, atau panas selatan, Fengyun T7 dapat secara berkesan memperbaiki masalah lompatan jarak suhu rendah, kenaikan tenaga suhu tinggi.
Memandangkan keseluruhan pasaran SUV tenaga baharu kelas 100,000, kebanyakan model bergantung pada penurunan spesifikasi penurunan harga, memampatkan masa penyelidikan untuk mendapatkan jualan jangka pendek, sukar membuat keselamatan, jarak, tenaga, kecerdasan, keselesaan lengkap seimbang.
Sedang Chery Fengyun T7 dengan piawaian penyelidikan global, spesifikasi penuh tiada perbezaan semua model, hak perlindungan berat, secara sepenuhnya memecah prasangka sedia ada 'tenaga rendah spesifikasi kelemahan' kereta harga rendah. Dari 1.45 juta kilometer ujian ketat tahan lasak, E-NCAP arkitektur keselamatan bintang lima, ke semua model 600km jarak jauh, tahap tinggi kecerdasan pemanduan, suhu luas stabil tiga sistem kuasa, Fengyun T7 menggunakan kekuatan produk yang kukuh membuktikan: SUV keluarga elektris harga tinggi, tidak perlu mengorbankan kualiti untuk mendapatkan harga lebih rendah.
Dengan harga 94,900 yang mesra, memberikan kekuatan keseluruhan tahap yang lebih tinggi dan jaminan penggunaan seumur hidup, SUV elektris kualiti global ini, adalah barisan baharu keras yang paling worth it untuk dimasukkan di kelas 100,000 pasaran rumah masa kini.
August 26, Chery Fengyun's global quality pure electric SUV Fengyun T7 officially launched, the new car offers 600km Enjoyment Edition, 600km Comfort Edition, 600km Smart Edition 3 versions, launch guide price 97,900 Yuan —118,900 Yuan, priority trade-in price 94,900 Yuan —115,900 Yuan.
Fengyun T7 is built on global quality, leveraging four core values: "Super Performance, Global Aesthetics, Safer, Great Intelligence", and six product strength redundancies: crash safety, battery safety, range equity, full-domain energy saving, handling performance, and vehicle verification. It offers a reliable and reassuring pure electric travel choice for global users, safeguarding every bit of "Steady Happiness".
Native Global Car, Slow Craft Makes Good Cars
In the industry's "speed-destroys-all" competition, Fengyun T7 chose a long-termism path — building good cars with patience. Slow in R&D: 3-year cycle, refined via global "1+7+N" R&D system; Slow in Design: 5,000+ user co-creation, 100+ designers collaborating; Slow in Standards: Developed per 2026 E-NCAP 5-star safety standard, entering high-regulation European markets soon; Slow in Verification: 1.45 million km durability test, enduring extreme environments like high/low temp, humidity, salinity, covering diverse global roads.
Fengyun T7 boasts solid global quality. Chery has led Chinese brand passenger car exports for 23 consecutive years, with over 20 million global users and products in 130+ markets; Lepas L6, the sibling global car of Fengyun T7, has already landed in South Africa and Thailand, with Indonesia in August, EU in September, and subsequent launches in Aus-NZ, UK, Israel, and Malaysia in October. Adapting to global regulations and driving conditions from the source, verifying overseas markets first before returning home, Fengyun T7 is a truly trustworthy native global car.
Four Values + Six Redundancies, Hardcore Strength Reshapes 100,000-Level Value Benchmark
• Super Performance: All models come standard with a 65.05kWh large-capacity battery, CLTC range 600km, tested range 681.6km realizing "reverse fake marking"; 30%–80% fast charging takes only 20 minutes; 178kW high-power motor, top speed 180km/h, 12-in-1 Kunpeng electric drive efficiency reaches 90.8%.
• Global Aesthetics: Created by 10 global design centers and 100+ designers, with 5,000+ users co-creating; 6 Eastern elegance paint colors, exclusive fiery orange Tri-coat three-layer luxury craft in its class; Cloud Wing hugging cabin is transparent and premium, two interior color schemes each beautiful in their own way.
• Safer: 80% high-strength steel, exclusive shotgun structure for its class, first dual-frame subframe + Pack crash beam for its class, up to 9 airbags in its class; 6D Armor 31-layer battery protection, IP68 waterproof rating 96 times national standard, side anti-compression 2 times national standard.
• Great Intelligence: Industry-first 4nm 8775 Cockpit-Driver Integrated Chip, 72 TOPS computing power, system response as low as 80ms; Lingxi Smart Cockpit 2.0 x Doubao LLM, full-scenario fuzzy voice interaction; 22 high-precision sensors, supporting 300+ full-scenario auto parking and highway pilot assist.
Meanwhile, Fengyun T7 breaks industry conventions with its six redundancies: crash safety, battery safety, range equity, full-domain energy saving, handling performance, and vehicle verification — rejecting range discrimination with equal range across all models; rejecting safety compromise with bunker-level structural redundancy; delivering high-end configurations directly to 100,000-level users, setting the value benchmark for 100,000-level pure electric SUVs with "Global Car price of 100,000 level, Real value of 200,000".
Wu Kequn appears at launch event, "Happiness Co-creation Plan" launched simultaneously
At the launch event, renowned musician Wu Kequn appeared as a surprise, taking the role of Fengyun T7 "Happiness Experience Officer". He chatted with Chery Auto Executive Vice President Li Xueyong about the topic "Steady Happiness" and car usage experiences, sharing feelings on exterior colors, cabin space, 600km standard range, multi-level intelligent parking, rock-solid body, and intelligent assist driving. Both parties agreed on the "Slow Craft Makes Good Cars" philosophy and jointly launched the Fengyun T7 "Happiness Co-creation Plan" on-site, calling on everyone to discover happy moments in life. A handover ceremony was held on-site during the launch, truly realizing "Delivery upon Launch". A group of foreign users who have lived in China for a long time became the first batch of Fengyun T7 owners.
8 Benefit Packages Launch Policy, Full Sincerity Included
Place an order by September 30 to enjoy 8 benefit packages: 6,000 Yuan personalized paint color (Fiery Orange, Mountain Smoke Purple) free for limited time; 2 years 60,000 interest-free or 5 years 100,000 3 years interest-free financial gift; 3,000 Yuan trade-in subsidy per vehicle regardless of brand; "2 Bottom Guarantees": Power battery safety coverage and up to 5 million Yuan intelligent driving coverage; "2 Lifetime Rights": Whole vehicle lifetime warranty (including battery, motor, ECU) and 666 Yuan purchase of 3,999 Yuan lifetime maintenance package; Lifetime free basic data flow, 3 years 5G / month free entertainment flow (limited to first owner). Additionally, the pre-sale 1,000 Yuan deposit offsetting 2,000 Yuan purchase price inflation gift is extended until August 31, 24:00.
From global standards, global verification, global adaptation to launch and delivery, Fengyun T7 unleashes the momentum of a "Global Quality Pure Electric SUV" with sincere pricing and global strength, unlocking a "Super Beautiful Better" automotive life for global users. Steady Happiness arrives as scheduled.
33 天，一萬多公裏。從西安大唐西市出發，橫跨中國六省，穿越泰國、馬來西亞，最終抵達新加坡——這唔係古絲路路上嘅駝隊故事，而係剛結束嘅「2026 絲路萬里行·啟迪之路」嘅真實行程。
8 月 25 日，呢支由新能源車輛組成嘅隊伍喺新加坡正式結束咗呢場跨國遠征。
千年絲路，換咗種行法
兩千幾十年前，駝隊運住絲綢、茶葉、瓷器同香藥，沿住河西走廊向西，走出嗰條連接東西方嘅文明通道。今日，車隊同樣由西安出發，但行嘅係一條向南嘅路線——經亳州、景德鎮、杭州、武夷山，集齊香藥、瓷器、絲綢、茶葉四大絲路文明信物，然後跨海進入東南亞。
有意思係，車隊喺國內段循住古絲路貿易嘅四大符號一路落去，而呢啲信物亦喺新加坡結束儀式上首次海外集中亮相。由西安到新加坡，由陸上絲路起點到海上絲路樞紐，呢條路線嘅選擇本身就係一種呼應——陸海聯動，絲路唔絕。
有網民評論話：「以前嘅絲路靠駱駝，一走就係大半年；而家車輪滾滾，一個月就係可以跨越國境。」呢啲就係呢場遠征最直觀嘅時代註腳。
技術係最好嘅通行證
萬裏行程，考驗嘅唔係情懷，係硬實力。
車隊由王朝、海洋、騰勢、方程豹、仰望五個系列組成，經歷咗高速公路、山區道路同城市擠塞等多種路況。最受關注嘅係兩項核心技術嘅「實景考試」：
閃充技術——「5 分鐘充好、9 分鐘充飽」，依托全國近萬座閃充站嘅網絡佈局，基本上化解咗長途補能焦慮。呢個意味住喺服務區飲杯咖啡嘅時間，車輛就充滿電出發。
輔助駕駛系統——日均超 2.2 億公里嘅真實行駛數據持續迭代，令長距離行車壓力大為減輕。
由古絲路嘅驛站補給到今日嘅閃充網絡，補能呢件事，本質上冇變——變嘅只係速度。當年駱駝需要歇腳飲水，而家嘅車只需要「飲電」幾分鐘。
獅城，既係終點亦係證明
揀新加坡作為結束地，並唔係偶然。
截至 2026 年 7 月，比亞迪已連續 19 個月高踞新加坡乘用車全品牌銷量第一位，2026 年前 7 個月市場份額達 24.7%，純電市場份額更係高達 40.3%。
要知道，新加坡係全球汽車擁有成本最高嘅市場之一。買車需要競標「車牌證」，價格动辄幾萬到十幾萬新幣，門檻極高。喺呢種市場裏面賣得好，而且售價唔低，靠嘅只係實打實嘅產品力同品牌認知。
而家，比亞迪喺新加坡已佈局 16 處零售觸點，部分門市進駐核心購物中心。當地經銷商亦喺持續加大終端投入，門市規模、區位選擇、空間設計都保持咗較高規格。一個品牌點樣喺海外立足，經銷商嘅態度係最誠實嘅指標。
唔止係車嘅遠征
從更宏觀嘅視角睇，呢場絲路萬里行唔止係一家車企嘅跨國路測，亦係一次中國品牌參與共建「一帶一路」綠色交通發展嘅實地呈現。
2026 年係中國—東盟建立全面戰略夥伴關係五週年，活動以「科技向新·文明向心」為主題，將文化交融、科技對話、經貿互通融為一體。中國駐新加坡大使館文化參贊、新加坡陝西會會長等各界嘉賓出席咗結束儀式。
數據顯示，2026 年 1 至 7 月，比亞迪海外累計銷量超 97 萬輛，同比增長約 76%；7 月單月海外銷量 17.98 萬輛，同比增長 124.3%。截至而家，其新能源汽車已進入全球超 120 個國家同地區。
由景德鎮嘅瓷器到而家嘅電池，由絲綢到智能座艙，絲路上流通嘅貨物喺變，但核心邏輯冇變——輸出始終係領先於時代嘅產品力。
寫落去最後
33 天，上萬裏，由西安到新加坡。呢條路上曾經行過駱駝、商隊、傳教士同探險家，而家駛過嘅係搭載閃充同輔助駕駛技術嘅新能源車隊。
技術嘅迭代從來都唔係為了炫技，而係解決真實嘅問題：點樣令長途出行唔咁焦慮，點樣令駕駛唔咁疲累，點樣令綠色出行真正變成可行嘅選擇。呢場萬裏遠征畀出嘅回答係：技術已經準備好咗，基礎設施正喺度鋪開，市場同消費者正喺度畀出回應。
古絲路嘅駝鈴聲已經走遠，取而代之嘅，係電流嘅聲響，絲路遠行綠能相伴，比亞迪令綠色出行為絲路賦能！
撰文 | 刘 颖
编辑 | 黄大路
设计 | 甄尤美
2026年8月24日，特朗普在社交媒体发文宣布，因不满巨额贸易逆差，美国自2027年起对加拿大汽车及钢铁重磅加征50%关税（在美生产免税）。他直言：加拿大需要美国，而非美国需要加拿大。
接着，加拿大政府25日宣布，对价值约200亿美元的美国商品加征反制关税，同时推出总额约54亿美元的企业和工人援助计划。该反制关税将于9月8日起生效。
可就在上个星期，美国原本准备把加拿大汽车进入美国的最高关税从25%降到15%，钢铝关税也有望减半，双方甚至已经谈到一辆汽车里的美国、加拿大和墨西哥价值究竟该怎么计算。
2026年8月14日，加拿大安大略省布兰普顿的2200多名汽车工人停产了两年，等来的不是复产日期，而是Stellantis正考虑关闭并出售工厂的消息。
这座工厂原本准备投入约13.2亿加元，生产下一代Jeep Compass。按照计划，生产线将逐步恢复三班倒，重新成为加拿大汽车工业的重要一环。
但改造在2025年初停了下来。几个月后，Stellantis宣布未来四年向美国投资130亿美元，Compass的生产计划也从加拿大转向美国。
美国伊利诺伊州贝尔维德尔工厂同样闲置多年，命运却恰好相反。
它的复产时间虽然从2027年推迟到2028年，Stellantis仍把改造预算从约6亿美元提高到8亿美元，并为它安排了新的Jeep车型。
关税还在谈判桌上拉锯，车企已经开始重新分配下一代车型。
过去，决定一款车在哪里生产的主要是人工、物流、汇率、供应商和工厂效率。现在又多了一项越来越重的变量：这辆车跨过美国边境时，要交多少税？
六年前搬去墨西哥，现在又搬回来
2020年，丰田把Tacoma皮卡从得州圣安东尼奥转去墨西哥时，商业逻辑十分清晰。
墨西哥人工成本更低，又处在北美自由贸易体系之内。只要满足原产地规则，零部件和整车就可以在美国、加拿大和墨西哥之间低成本流动。下加利福尼亚和瓜纳华托两座工厂由此接过了Tacoma的生产任务。
六年后，这辆皮卡又开始往回走。
2026年7月6日，丰田宣布向圣安东尼奥现有生产基地投资36亿美元，扩建第二条整车装配线，计划2030年投产，新增约2000个岗位。
按照计划，下加利福尼亚工厂承担的部分Tacoma产能将随之转回得州，瓜纳华托工厂继续运转。
丰田没有退出墨西哥，只是重新分配车型和产能，让更多准备卖给美国人的皮卡在美国生产。
本田和通用也在调整生产计划。
据路透社报道，本田原计划从2027年11月起在墨西哥生产下一代思域（Civic）混动车。特朗普提出对墨西哥和加拿大汽车加征25%关税后，项目转向了印第安纳州，预计2028年投产，年产量约21万辆。
一辆思域从墨西哥搬到美国，人工成本并没有下降。人工成本没变，过境后的成本变了。原本足以让墨西哥胜出的成本差距，被一笔可能高达两位数的进口税重新填平。
通用的转产范围更大。
公司计划从2028年起，把长期从中国进口美国的别克昂科威（Envision）交给堪萨斯城地区工厂。同一座工厂还将接手目前在墨西哥生产的雪佛兰探界者（Equinox），墨西哥生产的开拓者（Blazer）则准备转到田纳西州。
通用透露，海外车型转回美国以及增加软件投入，已经带来10亿至15亿美元额外费用。
日产美洲董事长穆尼耶（Christian Meunier）也承认，关税正在加快日产的生产本地化，“关税对日产反而有一点好处，因为它逼着我们加快了生产本地化。”
美国制造没有因此变得便宜，跨境生产却变贵了。
这场迁徙还没有全部发生在流水线上，但已经发生在车企的资本预算和下一代车型规划表里。今天重新分配的车型，决定的是2028年甚至2030年的产业版图。
三条通往美国的生产路线，开始改道
过去三十多年，墨西哥逐渐成为美国汽车工业的第二生产腹地。
2024年，墨西哥生产约400万辆轻型汽车，其中约280万辆销往美国。25%的名义汽车关税落地后，墨西哥作为对美整车出口基地的优势开始削弱。
过去三十多年，墨西哥逐渐成为美国汽车工业的第二生产腹地。
2024年，墨西哥生产约400万辆轻型汽车，其中约280万辆销往美国。25%的名义汽车关税落地后，墨西哥作为对美整车出口基地的优势开始削弱。
2025年，墨西哥汽车对美出口在连续多年增长后首次下降近3%。同期，行业就业也出现收缩。
变化不仅来自美国提高了对墨西哥和加拿大汽车的关税，也来自美国与其他汽车出口国重新谈出的税率。
日本、韩国和欧盟生产的汽车进入美国，税率已经降至约15%，英国多数车型约为10%。相比之下，墨西哥和加拿大生产的汽车虽然可以按照其中的美国制造价值获得扣减，却仍面对更高的名义税率和更复杂的原产地认证。
墨西哥阿瓜斯卡连特斯的COMPAS工厂，成了这种变化的一个缩影。这座由日产和梅赛德斯－奔驰共同运营的工厂已于今年5月底停止生产，买家至今尚未确定。奔驰把GLB的后续生产转往匈牙利，日产则结束了Infiniti QX50和QX55的生产。
比亚迪、吉利和越南VinFast曾进入COMPAS工厂竞购的最后阶段，奇瑞和长城此前也表达过兴趣。对这些企业而言，这座工厂眼下更现实的价值是墨西哥及拉丁美洲市场。要借此进入美国，还需要跨过原产地规则和联网汽车限制两道门槛。
加拿大面对的是另一种压力。
西安大略大学旗下先进制造网络数据显示，福特、通用、本田、Stellantis和丰田2016年在加拿大合计生产约230万辆汽车，到2025年降至约120万辆。
关税没有开启加拿大汽车工业的收缩，却进一步改变了车型分配。过去，一款依靠美国市场获得规模的车型可以放在加拿大生产；现在，同一款车跨过边境时需要重新计算关税，美国境内的闲置工厂由此获得更大优势。
整车可以重新分配，产业链却早已交织在一起。
福特位于加拿大温莎的发动机工厂，长期为肯塔基、密歇根、密苏里和俄亥俄的美国整车厂供货。加拿大生产的汽车平均约50%的价值来自美国，墨西哥组装汽车中的美国价值平均约为35%。
美国制造价值虽然可以从征税部分中扣除，加拿大组装汽车的整体成本仍会上升。一旦这些车型减产，为其供应发动机、电子件和其他零部件的美国工厂同样会失去订单。
正如加拿大汽车业人士反复警告的那样，伤害加拿大的汽车生产，也会沿着供应链伤到底特律。
加拿大也开始用市场准入换取生产承诺。在加拿大维持生产和投资的车企，可以在一定额度内免反制关税进口其在美国生产的汽车；一旦企业削减加拿大生产，相关优惠也会被收回。
Stellantis把Compass生产计划转向美国后，加拿大将其相关免税进口额度削减了50%，并启动程序追究其未履行投资承诺的责任。车型迁移由此不再只是企业内部的产能调配，也成为两个国家争夺投资和就业的手段。
中国通往美国的直接出口路线则在继续收窄。
2026年8月，福特确认，将从2030年起把部分面向美国市场的林肯车型由中国转到美国生产。其中最受关注的是Nautilus，这款SUV目前承担的综合关税达到52.5%。
美国联网汽车规则还限制部分中国软硬件用于在美销售的汽车。关税与技术监管叠加后，“中国生产、美国销售”越来越困难。
这不意味着跨国车企正在撤出中国。真正收窄的，是从中国、墨西哥和加拿大生产，再向美国出口的几条路线。这些路线上的下一代车型和新增总装产能，正在更多地落到美国境内。
一辆车，被拆成75%、82%和50%
美国总统特朗普和加拿大总理马克·卡尼（右） | 图源：路透社
到了谈判桌上，一辆车不再只是思域、Tacoma或者Campass，而是三个数字：75%、82%和50%。
现行《美国—墨西哥—加拿大协定》（USMCA）要求，享受优惠待遇的汽车通常需要约75%的价值来自北美。
美国在2026年讨论的新方案，准备把这一比例提高至约82%，并要求至少50%的整车价值直接形成于美国。发动机、主要电子元器件和软件等关键环节，也面临更高的原产地比例要求。
于是，一辆已经在美国工厂下线的汽车，还要继续回答：发动机来自哪里，线束在哪里生产，电池、软件和座椅分别算在哪个国家名下？
新的规则试图让企业不仅把总装放到美国，还把更多零部件、技术和采购带入美国。
发动机、电池、软件和座椅各自算多少，直接决定了一辆车跨境时能够获得多少关税扣减。
如果新原产地要求全部落地，路透社援引两家车企的内部测算称，底特律每家大型车企每年可能增加至少20亿美元费用。
通用预计2026年关税相关支出可能达到25亿至35亿美元，福特预计净影响约10亿美元。
这些成本不会停留在车企的报表里。
高利润皮卡和大型SUV或许可以通过提价消化，售价两三万美元的入门车型却没有同样空间。企业可能发现，无论继续承担关税，还是转到成本更高的美国工厂，都难以维持原有利润。
最后的选择未必是回流，也可能是减少进口、取消车型，或者让美国新车市场进一步向高价产品集中。
新的规则也在改变车企之间的关系。
关税落地之初，福特、通用和Stellantis曾联合呼吁维持USMCA。随着更严格的美国本土标准被讨论，车企之间开始出现分歧。
福特强调，其在美国销售的汽车约80%产自美国工厂，并以制造规模和就业岗位证明自己的本土贡献。
通用每年从韩国向美国进口约40万辆汽车，包括雪佛兰Trax、Trailblazer和别克Envista等入门级SUV。这些车型利润率有限，韩国制造的成本优势又让通用难以割舍。
通用则把注意力转向福特的供应链。
福特的F-150皮卡大量使用铝材，一直希望降低进口铝关税；福特在密歇根州的电池项目又采用了宁德时代技术。对通用而言，这些都可以用来质疑福特所强调的“美国制造”成色。
两家公司争夺的已不只是市场份额，还包括谁更符合华盛顿对“美国制造”的定义。
不过，当讨论转向是否维持USMCA时，它们仍然站到了一起，因为两家公司都无法在短期内脱离墨西哥和加拿大供应链。
总装线先走，供应商慢半拍
一件汽车零部件，可能先在加拿大完成第一道加工，送到美国，再进入墨西哥，最后返回美国装车。
麦格纳国际在美国拥有59座设施、加拿大50座、墨西哥33座。这张横跨三国的工厂网络，是北美汽车工业三十多年分工的结果。
关税落地后，零部件每跨一次边境，都要重新申报来源、价值和最终去向。麦格纳管理层担心，原本连续运转的生产流程，会在每一道边境线上多出一次核验和一笔成本。
“汽车业需要确定性、稳定的节奏和连续性。”
华盛顿想要的也不只是总装线。美国还在要求车企提高发动机、变速箱、电池、电子元器件和软件等环节的本土生产比例。
法国零部件供应商法雷奥透露，其在墨西哥生产并出口美国的产品中，约90%符合USMCA要求。与此同时，公司正在把部分模具等生产从中国转向墨西哥或者美国，以降低关税风险。
“搬离中国”“进入北美”和“搬到美国”，是三件不同的事。
高附加值、自动化程度较高或政策敏感的产品，更可能进入美国；一部分劳动密集型生产可能先转到成本较低的墨西哥；已经嵌入墨西哥和加拿大生产网络的零部件，则很难在短期内整体迁移。
整车厂可以通过一次决策分配新车型，数百家供应商却需要购置设备、调整模具、更换原材料，并重新通过漫长的质量认证。
关税能够制造在美国生产的动力，却不能凭空创造工人、供应商和低成本产能。
目前的美国汽车制造“回流”，因此更多表现为闲置工厂重新获得车型、现有工厂提高利用率，而不是突然出现大批全新的整车厂和供应商园区。
贝尔维德尔、通用堪萨斯工厂和田纳西工厂，都属于这一类。
新工厂也在出现。丰田计划在圣安东尼奥投资36亿美元；梅赛德斯－奔驰宣布向阿拉巴马工厂再投入40亿美元；现代汽车集团则计划到2028年在美国投资260亿美元，把美国年产量从约80万辆提高至120万辆。
但让现有工厂消化新车型，仍然是更快的选择。
另一个变化出现在零部件进口中。
2026年上半年，墨西哥向美国出口汽车零部件415.2亿美元，同比增长1.96%。同期，美国从全球进口汽车零部件的总额下降0.89%。
墨西哥在美国进口汽车零部件中的份额，由2025年的43.74%升至44.73%，创下新高。
这个比例指的是墨西哥在美国进口零部件中的份额，而不是在美国全部汽车零部件消费中的占比。它说明美国剩余的零部件进口正在向墨西哥集中，但不能单独证明美国本土零部件生产正在下降。
墨西哥拥有三十多年积累起来的工厂、熟练工人、物流网络和质量认证体系。对车企而言，从亚洲供应商转向墨西哥供应商，要比在美国从头培养一家新供应商更快，也更便宜。
在美国供应能力补齐之前，新增总装产能仍需要墨西哥供应商交货。
三个国家，仍是一座工厂
比亚迪在泰国罗勇府已经拥有年产15万辆的工厂，这座工厂于2024年7月投产，生产纯电动车和插电式混合动力车，同时面向泰国及其他东盟市场。印度尼西亚工厂规划投资10亿美元，设计年产能同样达到15万辆，长期目标也包括出口。
美国提高本土零部件比例，最终会推动一部分供应商向美国移动。
电池、芯片、核心软件、高端电子系统，以及自动化程度较高的结构件，更有条件靠近美国总装厂布局。劳动成本占比较高、利润率较低的线束、座椅和通用机械件，则更可能继续留在墨西哥。
加拿大拥有优势的发动机、整车和部分关键零部件，也不会立即消失。
美国正在获得更多总装和高价值环节，墨西哥继续承担大量通用件生产，加拿大则努力守住发动机和整车工厂。
8月18日的三天暂停没有换来协议。8月21日，美加谈判破裂，美国随后对部分加拿大商品实施新一轮50%关税，汽车也被列入其中。短暂的暂停没有消除不确定性，反而让车企更难继续等待。
工厂建设耗时数年，车企无法等待规则完全确定，只能在关税、成本与政治风险之间提前下注。
截至8月中旬，布兰普顿工厂仍在寻找买家，贝尔维德尔的复产则要等到2028年。这场迁徙已经写进车企的资本预算和车型规划，却还没有完全出现在流水线上。
《汽车商业评论》认为，下一批面向美国市场的汽车，会有更多在美国完成总装；但发动机、线束、座椅和电子元器件，仍将继续穿梭于美、墨、加三国之间。
也就是说，北美汽车工业还没有被拆开，其中的总装、投资和话语权正在进一步向美国倾斜。
主要参考资料：
1.“Trump says US and Canada strike deal, temporarily pauses tariffs”，Reuters，2026年8月18日。
2.“US automakers try to avoid Mexico-Canada trade pothole”，Reuters，2026年8月18日。
3.“Ford to move production of some Lincoln models from China to US”，Reuters，Nora Eckert，2026年8月12日。
4.“Detroit automakers fear North American trade deal revamp could cost them billions”，Reuters，2026年8月13日。
5.“Automakers plan billions in US investments but seek clear trade rules”，Reuters，David Shepardson、Kalea Hall，2026年4月1日。
6.“Toyota to build $3.6 billion Texas plant, shift some truck production from Mexico”，Reuters，2026年7月6日。
6.“Honda to produce next Civic in Indiana, not Mexico, due to US tariffs, sources say”，Reuters，Maki Shiraki，2025年3月3日。
8.“GM to move production of Buick SUV from China to US”，Reuters，Kalea Hall、David Shepardson，2026年1月22日。
9.“Seeking Mexico foothold, China's BYD and Geely bid to buy car plant”，Reuters，Emily Green，2026年2月12日。
10.“Stellantis considering sale of Canada plant, autoworker union says”，Reuters，2026年8月14日。
11.“Stellantis to invest $13 billion in the United States”，Reuters，2025年10月14日。
12.“The Road Behind Is Not the Road Ahead”，Trillium Network for Advanced Manufacturing，2026年。
13.“How one of the largest auto suppliers in the world is preparing for Trump's tariffs”，Reuters，Nora Eckert，2025年4月2日。
14.“Auto groups urge Trump to extend trade deal with Mexico, Canada”，Reuters，David Shepardson，2026年5月7日。
15.“German automaker Mercedes-Benz to invest $4 billion in Alabama SUV plant”，Reuters，David Shepardson，2026年3月31日。
Dalam pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli yang membandingkan Honda WR-V dan Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV ketika memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kereta ini mempunyai harga dan posisi pasaran yang agak hampir, hari ini kita akan buat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk bantu anda menjimatkan masa buat kajian.
Harga OTR Honda WR-V di Malaysia ialah RM 89,900 - 107,900, terdapat 4 varian, termasuk 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV di Malaysia ialah RM 129,750 - 129,750, terdapat 2 varian, termasuk 2025 1.5T 90km CSH (RM 129,750), Apakah kaedah pengecasan yang disokong oleh Tiggo 7 PHEV? Bolehkah ia dicas menggunakan soket kuasa rumah? (RM 117,478) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Honda WR-V memang lebih murah RM 39,850 berbanding Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV. Jika bajet anda terhad, versi entry Honda sudah mencukupi untuk keperluan harian. Tetapi perhatikan, perbezaan harga ribuan ringgit itu mungkin melibatkan kompromi pada peralatan, bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Honda WR-V dikuasakan enjin 1.5L 4-silinder, kuasa 105 hp. Penggunaan bahan api rasmi 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV dikuasakan Hybrid, kuasa 170 hp. Penggunaan bahan api rasmi 4.5 L/100km.
Dari segi kuasa, Hybrid pada Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV mempunyai 65 hp lebih berbanding enjin 1.5L 4-silinder Honda WR-V. Namun untuk penggunaan harian di bandar, kedua-dua kereta ini mempunyai kuasa yang mencukupi, tidak terasa kurang tenaga.
Penarafan keselamatan Honda WR-V ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk Honda SENSING.
Penarafan keselamatan Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV ialah TBD, sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk Sistem Asas.
Dari segi peralatan keselamatan, kedua-dua kereta ini mendapat penarafan yang baik. Walau bagaimanapun, terdapat perbezaan fungsional antara Honda SENSING pada Honda WR-V dan Sistem Asas pada Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV. Jika anda mengambil berat keselamatan aktif, sila bandingkan senarai fungsi keduanya dengan teliti.
Panjang badan Honda WR-V 4400 mm, beg bagasi 400 L.
Panjang badan Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 4400 mm, beg bagasi 400 L.
Saiz kedua-dua kereta hampir sama, ruang dalaman tiada perbezaan ketara. Kereta dalam kategori ini sudah mencukupi untuk kegunaan harian.
Honda WR-V menggunakan gaya pemanduan FWD.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV menggunakan gaya pemanduan FWD.
Gaya pemanduan kedua-dua kereta sama, iaitu FWD, pengalaman memandu harian tidak akan berbeza banyak.
Secara keseluruhan, Honda WR-V dan Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV adalah model kereta yang sangat bagus di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana, utama bergantung pada keperluan peribadi dan bajet anda. Disyorkan membuat kajian, bandingkan beberapa sebut harga dari kedai kereta yang berbeza, kemudian uji untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, mengambil masa untuk membuat kajian pasti tidak salah.
8月21日，2026成都国际车展盛大启幕，深蓝汽车携全系明星车型重磅亮相，并正式发布全新深蓝G318。新车提供华为乾崑与天枢领航两套智能辅助驾驶系统，共推出四驱舒享天枢版、四驱舒享乾崑版、四驱空悬乾崑版三款配置车型。限时优惠价19.68万元-23.68万元，下订即享至高价值44159元的八大超值礼包。与此同时，"公路磁悬浮"深蓝L06全新特别版也迎来首秀，以赛道化竞速套件进一步满足消费者对驾控体验的极致需求。
20万级唯一搭载华为乾崑双智方盒子 “科技平权”打造全能出行最优解
全新深蓝G318锚定家庭用户“9成城市从容代步，1成户外随心撒野”的真实出行需求，不仅以"9城1野"重新定义方盒子新标准，更围绕"SUV的终极形态之一是方盒子"的判断，将方盒子从单一越野工具推向家庭全能出行最优解。
作为20万级唯一搭载华为乾崑双智的方盒子，全新深蓝G318践行科技平权品牌使命，首次将华为乾崑ADS 5 Pro和鸿蒙座舱HarmonySpace 5带入该价位段方盒子市场，让 "每天好开，全家好坐，偶尔去野" 成为城市家庭触手可及的日常。
全新深蓝G318搭载华为乾崑ADS 5 Pro，可实现城区领航辅助NCA、高速领航辅助NCA及全域智能泊车辅助，让智能真正服务于日常出行。这背后是27个传感器融合感知系统，与快速迭代、越变越强的全新WEWA 2.0架构的协同支撑。尤其面对城市通勤中最棘手的环岛通行、无保护左转、窄道防剐蹭、拥堵防加塞，系统均能自主应对，让每一程都从容不迫。
安全方面，其采用的舱内激光Limera反应更迅速，无惧雨天、隧道、暗光、逆光等恶劣环境，可提前116m识别30cm x 30cm小障碍物，同时安装于舱内，无风阻、不遮挡、无惧脏污，使用更省心。行业首创的全维防碰撞系统CAS，将24项主动安全能力内嵌于每一次规划与决策，其中4大核心安全场景实现同级跨代领先，让车辆能以远超人驾的反应速度提前化解风险，守护行车安全。
座舱方面，全新深蓝G318以鸿蒙座舱HarmonySpace 5打造最懂中国人的家庭智能空间。手车互联无需任何按键操作，登录同一华为账号后，鸿蒙系统手机靠近车机屏幕即可自动无缝连接，跨端内容无缝接力，出行生活连贯不中断。15.6英寸华为智慧屏，拥有影院级超清画质，3D实时控车，所见即所控，地图缩放、应用菜单翻找等操作极致丝滑不卡顿。语音交互上，搭载行业第一梯队的MoLA大模型架构，支持十个指令混说无障碍，四川话、粤语等十大方言随心说；导航Agent更能听懂"机场旁边那家咖啡店"这类模糊表达，自动纠偏口误并规划最优路线，让智慧出行真正惠及家庭的每一位成员。
底盘与空间方面，全新深蓝G318搭载备受好评的同级唯一"空悬+CDC+魔毯"舒适三件套，配合双叉臂+多连杆独立悬架，以毫秒级阻尼调节主动适应不同路况：城市路况保持柔顺静谧，近郊多变路况则更平顺。超5m方正车身与长轴距带来宽适空间，后排纯平放倒还可秒变1.8m大床，装人载物都留有余量。动力方面，新车最大马力450匹、峰值扭矩552N·m、零百加速5秒级，配合双电机真四驱、两把差速锁、ET全地形系统，非铺装路面亦可从容通行。
深蓝L06全新特别版首秀，赛道化竞速套件拉满运动驾趣
深蓝L06凭借300万法拉利同款磁流变悬架与全场景新手友好型智能辅助驾驶，不仅让年轻用户轻松享受驾控乐趣，更在15万级市场形成逆势上扬的销量势能，7月销量达7,267辆，连续5个月销量突破5000辆，连续多个月位居20万内新能源中型车销冠，被称为年轻人的第一台运动轿跑。
为进一步满足年轻用户对运动驾趣的进阶需求，深蓝L06全新特别版也于成都车展正式首秀。该版本搭载赛道化竞速套件，涵盖车头立体风刃与一体式前铲、侧裙风刃造型装饰件，以及碳纤维材质固定大尾翼。
车头立体风刃搭配一体式前铲，有效削弱高速行驶产生的升力；车身两侧侧裙风刃梳理车侧乱流，增强车身稳定性；更有碳纤维材质固定大尾翼，提升抓地力。整车最高下压力达1000N，车辆稳稳贴合地面，过弯更爽、高速更稳，充分满足年轻用户“既要日常舒适、又要赛道气场”的出行需求。
全系明星车型集结，全维矩阵覆盖多元出行需求
深蓝汽车旗下全系车型也同步亮相展台。“全球时尚激光智能SUV”全新深蓝S05于8月6日焕新上市后，上市即上量，目前已全面到店。新车将激光雷达、一段式端到端算法、3nm车规级座舱芯片与FSD+HRS高阶可变自适应悬架等越级配置一次性带入主流家用市场，配合11.59万元起的限时优惠价及至高价值38360元的八大超值礼包，打造出极具质价比的15万级紧凑型SUV价值标杆。值得一提的是，作为深蓝汽车全球化战略的核心载体，深蓝S05已进入全球73个国家和地区，不仅收获25万+用户信赖，更荣获德国iF设计大奖、泰国年度汽车大奖等多项国际权威荣誉，名副其实的全球爆款。
全新深蓝S07已实现了“纯电+增程”两大动力形式的激光智能辅助驾驶全覆盖，突破性地将30万级激光智能辅助驾驶带入15万级主流市场。尤其在智能安全层面，华为乾崑方案实现城区领航全覆盖与高速场景全维守护，配合同级唯一标配的FSD+HRS可变自适应底盘，既筑牢出行安全防线，也为用户提供了超值智慧之选。
此外，"智慧旗舰大六座SUV"深蓝S09，兼顾家庭与商务出行；“科技智享中型轿车”深蓝L07则聚焦中型轿车市场，专注科技配置与日常舒适性的平衡。
销量势能稳步攀升，全球化版图持续拓展
强劲的产品攻势，正转化为稳健的市场表现。2026年1-7月，深蓝汽车全球累计销量193,369辆，同比增长13.48%；其中海外累计销量44,508辆，同比增长87.48%。截至7月，深蓝汽车全球累计销量已突破91万辆，伴随全新深蓝S05、全新深蓝G318的焕新登场，预计年内将稳步迈向百万用户里程碑。作为长安汽车"海纳百川"计划的先行者，深蓝汽车已布局五大区域，覆盖全球超100个国家和地区，全球版图持续有序拓展。
核心技术集中亮相，"科技深蓝"底色持续夯实
自品牌创立以来，深蓝汽车持续深耕智能化与电动化赛道，致力于将前沿技术转化为用户可感知的出行价值，稳步推动科技平权。
智能化领域，深蓝汽车依托“天枢领航”与“华为乾崑”双重技术方案，以丰富智能产品矩阵满足多元用户需求，推动激光雷达与智能座舱惠及更广泛用户群体。本次车展，曾于去年12月拿下国内首批L3级自动驾驶正式专用号牌的车型也同步展出，为深蓝汽车高阶智能辅助驾驶能力提供了坚实注脚。
电动化领域，深蓝汽车自主研发的原力超集电驱历经多代技术迭代，累计45个月超百万台下线，系统总成工况效率94.13%，位居全球第一。金钟罩电池两获国家科学技术进步二等奖，以行驶60万公里衰减无感知、守护超210万用户的卓越表现，为全系产品提供坚实保障。微核高频脉冲加热技术摘得中国专利金奖，有效缓解低温环境下的性能衰减。下半年深蓝汽车纯电车型将陆续搭载800V高压平台，支持6C超充，以10分钟补能30%-80%的极致效率，持续拓宽电动出行的体验边界。
展台互动与沟通双管齐下，诠释品牌年轻化底色
本次车展，《喜剧之王单口季2》冠军翟佳宁首次携手汽车品牌，担任全新深蓝G318智能体验官，用脱口秀的方式把产品亮点变成有梗的段子，轻松有趣地触达年轻用户。同时展台将L3自动驾驶问答、王者荣耀争霸赛、用户共创手作区、盲盒抽奖与弹幕互动等玩法贯穿全场，让硬核技术可看、可感、可玩。
全新深蓝G318的上市，不只是一次产品焕新，更是深蓝汽车对“家庭出行”这一命题的重新作答。新车不仅让方盒子从户外穿越回归家庭日常，也让智能进阶真正落到用户最真实的生活半径里。以此为起点，深蓝汽车将持续把更成熟的智能体验与更领先的技术，带进全球更多家庭。
8月21日-30日，深蓝汽车欢迎广大用户携家人前往中国西部国际博览城11号馆深蓝汽车展台，近距离品鉴深蓝全系车型的智能魅力。
Di pasaran SUV Malaysia, ramai pembeli semasa memilih kereta sering membandingkan Proton X90 dan Subaru Forester. Kedua-dua kenderaan ini hampir sama dari segi harga dan pengelasan, hari ini kita akan buat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Harga OTR Proton X90 di Malaysia adalah RM 106,800 - 122,800, terdapat 4 varian, termasuk 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Subaru Forester di Malaysia adalah RM 174,000 - 197,000, terdapat 3 varian, termasuk 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition (RM 189,538), 2024 2.0L S EyeSight (RM 177,538), 2024 2.0L L EyeSight (RM 167,538) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X90 memang RM 67,200 lebih murah daripada Subaru Forester. Jika bajet anda terhad, varian permulaan Proton sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Tetapi perlu diingat, perbezaan ribuan ringgit itu mungkin mempunyai kompromi dari segi kelengkapan, bergantung kepada keperluan anda.
Proton X90 menggunakan 1.5L Turbo, kuasa 140 hp. Kecekapan minyak rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Subaru Forester menggunakan 2.0L 4-cyl, kuasa 170 hp. Kecekapan minyak rasmi 8.0 L/100km.
Dari segi kuasa, 2.0L 4-cyl Subaru Forester mempunyai 30 kuasa kuda lebih daripada 1.5L Turbo Proton X90. Namun untuk penggunaan harian di bandar, kuasa kedua-dua kenderaan sudah mencukupi, tidak rasa kekurangan tenaga.
Penarafan keselamatan Proton X90 ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Penarafan keselamatan Subaru Forester ialah 5★ (Euro NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk EyeSight.
Dari segi kelengkapan keselamatan, kedua-dua kenderaan mendapat penarafan yang baik. Namun ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) Proton X90 dan EyeSight Subaru Forester mempunyai perbezaan dari segi fungsi. Jika anda lebih mengutamakan keselamatan aktif, boleh bandingkan senarai fungsi kedua-duanya dengan teliti.
Panjang badan Proton X90 4400 mm, muatan bagasi 400 L.
Panjang badan Subaru Forester 4400 mm, muatan bagasi 400 L.
Saiz kedua-dua kenderaan hampir sama, perbezaan ruang dalaman tidak banyak. Untuk kereta kelas ini, keperluan harian sudah mencukupi.
Proton X90 waranti 5 tahun/150,000km, interval servis setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Subaru Forester waranti 3 tahun/100,000km, interval servis setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Secara keseluruhannya, Proton X90 dan Subaru Forester kedua-duanya model kereta yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih mana satu, penting bergantung kepada keperluan peribadi dan bajet anda. Kami sarankan anda membuat kajian terlebih dahulu, bandingkan beberapa tawaran kedai kereta, dan uji jalan untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa membuat kajian tidak akan salah.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Honda WR-V 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾相近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細比較，幫你省回做功課嘅時間。
Honda WR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,900 - 107,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2023 1.5L V（RM 99,900）、2023 1.5L E（RM 95,900）、2023 1.5L S（RM 89,900）等。
Toyota Corolla Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 133,800 - 148,800，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport（RM 148,800）、2026 HEV 1.8L Standard（RM 140,800）、2026 1.8L Standard（RM 133,800）等。
睇返價錢，Honda WR-V 嘅起價確實比 Toyota Corolla Cross 平咗 RM 43,900。如果你預算有限，Honda 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體睇你嘅需求。
Honda WR-V 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Toyota Corolla Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。
Honda WR-V 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Toyota Corolla Cross 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問下真實車主嘅經驗。
Honda WR-V 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先最重要。
總體嚟講，Honda WR-V 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係睇返你嘅個人需要同預算。建议大家做好做功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最後決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
Dalam pasaran SUV Malaysia, ramai pembeli semasa memilih kereta akan membandingkan Proton X90 dan Mitsubishi Xforce. Kedua-dua kereta ini mempunyai harga dan kedudukan yang agak dekat, hari ini kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek, membantu anda menjimatkan masa menyiapkan kajian.
Harga OTR Proton X90 di Malaysia ialah RM 106,800 - 122,800, terdapat keseluruhan 4 varian, termasuk 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Mitsubishi Xforce di Malaysia ialah RM 109,930 - 119,930, terdapat keseluruhan 2 varian, termasuk 2026 1.5L Ultimate (RM 119,930), 2026 1.5L Urban (RM 109,930) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X90 memang lebih murah RM 3,130 berbanding Mitsubishi Xforce. Jika anda mempunyai bajet terhad, versi permulaan Proton sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Tetapi perlu diingat, ribuan ringgit yang lebih murah itu, mungkin ada pertimbangan dalam peralatan, bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Panjang badan Proton X90 4400 mm, ruang bagasi 400 L.
Panjang badan Mitsubishi Xforce 4400 mm, ruang bagasi 400 L.
Saiz kedua-dua kereta hampir sama, ruang dalaman tidak banyak berbeza. Kereta dari julat harga ini, untuk penggunaan harian adalah cukup.
Proton X90 menggunakan sistem pemacu hadapan (FWD).
Mitsubishi Xforce menggunakan sistem pemacu hadapan (FWD).
Sistem pemacu kedua-dua kereta sama, kedua-duanya FWD, pengalaman memandu harian tidak akan banyak berbeza.
Proton X90 dan Mitsubishi Xforce adalah pilihan utama di pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga, perjalanan harian. Jika anda lebih mementingkan reputasi jenama dan harga kedua, pertimbangkan yang lebih baik reputasinya; jika anda lebih mementingkan nilai dan peralatan, pilih yang lebih lengkap. Pada akhirnya, disarankan untuk melakukan uji jalan pada kedua-duanya, pengalaman langsung adalah yang paling penting.
Secara keseluruhan, Proton X90 dan Mitsubishi Xforce adalah model kereta yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana, bergantung kepada keperluan peribadi dan bajet anda. Disarankan untuk membuat kajian, bandingkan sebut harga dari beberapa kedai kereta, kemudian uji jalan untuk keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara penting, meluangkan masa untuk membuat kajian tidak akan salah.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X90 同 Hyundai Tucson 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一次詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
Hyundai Tucson 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 143,888 - 197,888，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige（RM 197,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige（RM 186,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime（RM 164,888） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X90 嘅起步價確實比 Hyundai Tucson 平咗 RM 37,088。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
Proton X90 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Hyundai Tucson 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 SmartSense。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全嘅。而家嘅新車安全性都唔錯，唔使太擔心這一點。
Proton X90 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Hyundai Tucson 保修 5 年/300,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X90 同 Hyundai Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就選配置更豐富嗰款。最後都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總括嚟講，Proton X90 同 Hyundai Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場幾好嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要看你個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
Imports of electric vehicles priced within 200,000 Ringgit (approximately 75.15 million Korean Won) and with a maximum power output below 241 horsepower are prohibited. The policy aims to guide automakers to build factories locally for production!
Malaysian authorities are tightening import controls on Chinese electric vehicle companies led by BYD.
Malaysia's new car sales in 2025 reached 820,752 units, setting a new historical record. Previously, Indonesia had always held the top spot for Southeast Asian car sales; before the pandemic, Indonesia's annual new car sales consistently exceeded 1 million units.
However, affected by the domestic economic environment, Indonesia's 2025 car sales dropped 7.2% from 856,000 units in 2024 to 803,000 units. In contrast, Malaysia's sales rose slightly by 0.5% year-on-year, topping Southeast Asia's car market sales rankings.
Malaysian authorities have introduced two entry thresholds for imported electric vehicles: First, the vehicle's maximum power output must exceed 241 horsepower; Second, the selling price must exceed 200,000 Ringgit. Simply put, non-luxury electric vehicles are universally prohibited from being imported and sold.
Brands like BYD, which focuses on affordable small electric vehicles to grab market share, and Zeekr, whose main models are mid-size cars (Zeekr), will be directly impacted.
BYD currently has 7 models positioned in Malaysia, ranging from the entry-level Dolphin and Yuan PLUS (Atto 3) to the high-end Sea Lion 7 (Sealion 7), with all series starting prices below 200,000 Ringgit. Zeekr's main model, the Zeekr 7X, also has a starting price of less than 200,000 Ringgit and fails to meet import sales standards.
Zeekr 7X
Malaysia's restriction on importing Chinese electric vehicles aims to protect local automakers on one hand, and on the other, to force Chinese electric vehicle enterprises to invest and build factories locally. According to Malaysia's Ministry of Transport statistics, Chinese electric vehicles already occupy about 60% of the country's electric vehicle market share.
Malaysia also introduced restriction clauses for locally produced electric vehicles, providing dual protection for the local market: the minimum price for locally produced electric vehicles is 100,000 Ringgit, domestic sales share must not exceed 20%, at least 80% of production must be used for export, otherwise production is not allowed. Additionally, the policy mandates that the three core processes of welding, painting, and final assembly must be completed within Malaysia, thereby curbing the influx of large quantities of Chinese electric vehicles into the local market.
Following the European market, the Southeast Asian economic powerhouse Malaysia has also erected trade barriers against Chinese automakers, forcing Chinese electric vehicle enterprises to adjust their overseas sales strategies. It is reported that Malaysia's restrictive policies are beginning to show results, with some Chinese automakers such as Xpeng, MG, and Wuling planning to cooperate with local enterprises to implement complete vehicle production projects in Malaysia.
© 2024 Bitauto.com. All Rights Reserved.
Bitauto (www.yiche.com and www.bitauto.com) is one of the most visited automotive websites in China. We provide detailed info on Chinese car brands available in your area. Please note that the information provided on this website is based on publicly available data and is for reference only. It may not be fully updated or accurate at all times.
Help us improve our website
