喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家揀車嗰陣都會拎 Proton X70 同 Toyota Fortuner 嚟比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都好接近,今日我哋就由多個方面嚟做詳細對比,幫你慳晒做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300,合共 3 個版本,包括 1.5L Standard 2WD(RM 106,800)、1.5L Executive 2WD(RM 115,800)、1.5L Premium 2WD(RM 122,300) 等。
Toyota Fortuner 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 195,880 - 241,880,合共 3 個版本,包括 2024 2.8T VRZ Diesel(RM 241,880)、2024 2.7L SRZ Petrol(RM 202,880)、2024 2.4L Standard Diesel(RM 195,880) 等。
睇過價錢之後,Proton X70 嘅起步價確實比 Toyota Fortuner 平咗 RM 89,080。如果你預算有限,Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意,平嗰幾千塊,喺配備上或有取捨,具體要看你嘅需要。

Proton X70 配備 1.5L Turbo,馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Toyota Fortuner 配備 2.5L Diesel,馬力 187 hp。官方油耗 8.5 L/100km。
動力方面,Toyota Fortuner 嘅 2.5L Diesel 比 Proton X70 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 47 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區行,兩部車嘅動力都夠用,唔會覺得唔夠力。

Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm,行李箱 400 L。
Toyota Fortuner 車身長 4400 mm,行李箱 400 L。
兩部車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣,車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車,日常使用完全夠用。

Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Toyota Fortuner 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩部車嘅驅動方式一樣,都係 FWD,日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
總體嚟講,Proton X70 同 Toyota Fortuner 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部,關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time doing homework.
The OTR selling price of Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR selling price of Chery Tiggo 7 Pro in Malaysia is RM 123,750 - 123,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 125,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 140,000), etc.
From the price perspective, Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 33,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 7 Pro. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand cheaper, there might be trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.

Proton X50's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro's safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
In terms of safety features, both cars received good ratings. However, Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro's Basic have some differences in functions. If you value active safety, you can compare the function lists of both in detail.

Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. For this class of cars, daily use is completely sufficient.

Proton X50 uses 4WD drive mode.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro uses FWD drive mode.
Proton's 4WD and Chery's FWD will have different handling experiences, test driving comparison is recommended.
Overall, Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do homework, compare quotes from several car dealers, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing homework will never be wrong.

[Maklumat CNMO Tech] Saat ini, jumlah penghantaran pasaran luar negara Kereta XPeng telah mencapai 105,245 unit, telah rasmi menembusi 100,000 unit. Pada 29 Julai, CNMO Tech memperhatikan, blogger @KeretaElektrikKeluarNegeri telah menyenaraikan taburan wilayah eksport Kereta XPeng.
Dari segi taburan wilayah, peta pasaran luar negara Kereta XPeng telah meliputi Eropah, Timur Tengah, Asia Tenggara dan Oceania serta pasaran lain, antara Israel, Norway dan Denmark tiga negara menyumbang jumlah jualan terbanyak.
Secara khusus, Israel merupakan pasaran luar negara tunggal terbesar Kereta XPeng, jumlah kumulatif penjualan mencapai 14,189 unit, mewakili 13% daripada jumlah jualan luar negara. Norway menduduki tempat kedua dengan jualan 11,124 unit, bahagian pasaran 11%. Sebagai salah satu negara dengan kadar penembusan Kereta Elektrik Baharu tertinggi di Eropah, Norway telah lama menjadi destinasi penting bagi banyak jenama Kereta Elektrik China yang dieksport. Denmark menduduki tempat ketiga dengan 9,169 unit jualan, bahagian pasaran 9%. Ketiga-tiga negara ini bersama-sama menyumbang lebih 34,400 unit jualan, mewakili hampir satu pertiga daripada jumlah jualan luar negara Kereta XPeng, membentuk asas perniagaan luar negara Kereta XPeng.
Di pasaran lain Eropah, jumlah kumulatif jualan Kereta XPeng di Perancis ialah 7,112 unit, bahagian pasaran 7%; Jerman 6,741 unit, bahagian pasaran 6%; Belanda menduduki tempat ke-7 dengan 3,584 unit; Belgium menduduki tempat ke-9 dengan 2,540 unit; Sweden menduduki tempat ke-10 dengan 2,493 unit. Tambahan pula, pasaran Sepanyol, Portugal, United Kingdom, Itali, Ireland, Austria, Switzerland, Iceland, Finland juga menyumbang jualan pada tahap yang berbeza.
Di pasaran Asia Tenggara, Thailand menduduki tempat ke-6 dengan 5,297 unit, bahagian pasaran 5%, merupakan pasaran terbaik Kereta XPeng di Asia Tenggara. Malaysia menduduki tempat ke-8 dengan 2,687 unit, Indonesia menduduki tempat ke-12 dengan 2,234 unit, Singapura menduduki tempat ke-14 dengan 1,767 unit.
Di pasaran Oceania, Australia menduduki tempat ke-11 dengan 2,324 unit, New Zealand menduduki tempat ke-24 dengan 114 unit. Di pasaran Timur Tengah, Mesir menduduki tempat ke-16 dengan 1,082 unit, Israel sebagai pasaran penting di kawasan Timur Tengah, data penjualan 14,189 unit berada di hadapan dalam kawasan Timur Tengah dan Afrika Utara.

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會揀 寶騰 X70 同 豐田 Corolla Cross 黎做比較。呢兩款車喺價碼同定位上都幾接近嘅,而家我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比,幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300,合共 3 個版本,包括 1.5L Standard 2WD(RM 106,800)、1.5L Executive 2WD(RM 115,800)、1.5L Premium 2WD(RM 122,300)等等。
豐田 Corolla Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 133,800 - 148,800,合共 3 個版本,包括 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport(RM 148,800)、2026 HEV 1.8L Standard(RM 140,800)、2026 1.8L Standard(RM 133,800)等等。
由價錢嚟睇,寶騰 X70 嘅起步價的確比 豐田 Corolla Cross 平咗 RM 27,000。如果你預算有限,寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都需要注意,平嗰啲幾千蚊,可能喺配備上會有取捨,具體就要睇你嘅需要。

寶騰 X70 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
豐田 Corolla Cross 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 TSS (PCS, LDA, ACC, LTA)。
兩款車嘅安全评分一樣,喺呢個級數裡面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差,唔使太擔心呢一點。

寶騰 X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
豐田 Corolla Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣,都係 FWD,日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。

寶騰 X70 保修 5 年/150,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
豐田 Corolla Cross 保修 5 年/無限制里程,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講,寶騰 X70 同 豐田 Corolla Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛,關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再去做試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事,花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The Chery Tiggo 8 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 129,750 - 129,750, with a total of 1 version, including 2026 1.6T Standard (RM 129,750), etc.
From the price perspective, the starting price of the Proton X50 is indeed RM 39,950 cheaper than the Chery Tiggo 8. If your budget is limited, the Proton entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, also note that the few thousand difference might involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific requirements.

The Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The Chery Tiggo 8 safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars received good ratings. However, there are some differences in functionality between the Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and the Chery Tiggo 8's Basic. If you value active safety, you can compare the feature lists of both carefully.

Proton X50 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 8 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. For cars in this class, it is fully sufficient for daily use.

Both the Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with the better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configurations. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.

Overall, both the Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 are excellent models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, comparing quotes from several car dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not be wrong.

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺選車嗰陣都會拿 寶騰 X70 同 本田 CR-V 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾近,今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較,幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300,一共有 3 個版本,包括 1.5L Standard 2WD(RM 106,800)、1.5L Executive 2WD(RM 115,800)、1.5L Premium 2WD(RM 122,300) 等。
本田 CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 178,200 - 195,900,一共有 4 個版本,包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS(RM 195,900)、2026 1.5T 4WD V(RM 181,900)、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E(RM 178,200) 等。
從價錢嚟睇,寶騰 X70 嘅起步價確實比 本田 CR-V 平咗 RM 71,400。如果你預算有限,寶騰 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都係要注意,平嗰幾千蚊,可能喺配備上會有取舍,具體要看你嘅需求。

寶騰 X70 車身長 4400 mm,後備箱 400 L。
本田 CR-V 車身長 4500 mm,後備箱 450 L。
空間方面,本田 CR-V 嘅車身比 寶騰 X70 長咗 100 mm,乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 寶騰 X70 喺城市入面停車會靈活啲,各有取舍。

寶騰 X70 保修 5 年/150,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
本田 CR-V 保修 5 年/無限制里程,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

寶騰 X70 同 本田 CR-V 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇,適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價,可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款;如果你更在意性價比同配備,就選配置更豐富嗰款。最尾都係建議兩款都去試駕,親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總得嚟講,寶騰 X70 同 本田 CR-V 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。邊輛選,關鍵仲係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿寶騰 X70 同本田 CR-V 來做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近,今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較,幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300,一共有 3 個版本,包括 1.5L Standard 2WD(RM 106,800)、1.5L Executive 2WD(RM 115,800)、1.5L Premium 2WD(RM 122,300) 等。
本田 CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 178,200 - 195,900,一共有 4 個版本,包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS(RM 195,900)、2026 1.5T 4WD V(RM 181,900)、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E(RM 178,200) 等。
從價錢睇落,寶騰 X70 嘅起步價確實比本田 CR-V 平咗 RM 71,400。如果你預算有限,寶騰嘅入門版已經可以满足日常需求。但都要注意,平嗰幾千蚊,可能喺配備上面會有取舍,具體要睇你嘅需求。

寶騰 X70 嘅安全評級係 5 星 (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
本田 CR-V 嘅安全評級係 5 星 (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括本田 SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣,喺呢個級別裡面安全配備都算給得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都不差,唔使太擔心呢一點。

寶騰 X70 車身長 4400 mm,車尾箱 400 L。
本田 CR-V 車身長 4500 mm,車尾箱 450 L。
空間方面,本田 CR-V 嘅車身比寶騰 X70 長咗 100 mm,乘坐空間更有優勢。不過寶騰 X70 喺城市入面泊車會靈活啲,各有取舍。

寶騰 X70 保養 5 年/150,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
本田 CR-V 保養 5 年/無限制里程,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講,寶騰 X70 同本田 CR-V 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊部車,關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課,多睇幾間車行嘅報價,再去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事,花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Chery Tiggo 8 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 129,750 - 129,750, with a total of 1 version, including 2026 1.6T Standard (RM 129,750), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 39,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 8. If your budget is limited, the entry-level Proton can already meet daily needs. But keep in mind, the few thousand dollars cheaper might mean compromises in features, it depends on your specific needs.

Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 8 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Regarding power, Chery Tiggo 8's 1.5L Turbo has 35 hp more than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power, you won't feel underpowered.

Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 8 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Both cars' dimensions are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. Cars in this class are completely adequate for daily use.

Proton X50 uses 4WD drive system.
Chery Tiggo 8 uses FWD drive system.
Proton's 4WD and Chery's FWD will feel different in handling, test drive comparison is recommended.

Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, consider the one with better reputation first; if you care more about cost-performance and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.

Overall, Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, compare quotes from several car dealers, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will never be wrong.

In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300) etc.
Chery Tiggo 8 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 129,750 - 129,750, with a total of 1 version, including 2026 1.6T Standard (RM 129,750) etc.
In terms of price, Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 39,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 8. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand dollars saved might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.

Proton X50 is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 8 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Chery Tiggo 8's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power and won't feel underpowered.

Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Chery Tiggo 8 safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 8's Basic differ in functionality. If you value active safety more, you can compare the feature lists of both closely.

Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 8 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, interior space difference is small. For a car in this class, daily use is more than sufficient.

Both Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.

In general, Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 are both excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research is never wrong.

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 嚟作比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近,今日我哋就從多個方面作一個詳細嘅對比,幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300,合共有 4 個版本,包括 1.5T Executive(RM 89,800)、1.5T Premium(RM 101,800)、1.5T Flagship(RM 113,300) 等。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750,合共有 2 個版本,包括 1.6L Turbo Standard(RM 130,000)、1.6L Turbo Premium(RM 145,000) 等。
睇過價錢之後,Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 平咗 RM 69,950。如果你預算有限,Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意,平嗰幾千蚊,可能喺配備上會有取舍,具體要看你嘅需要。

Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 嘅安全評級係 TBD,主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面,兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲分別,如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話,可以仔細對比一吓兩者嘅功能列表。

Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm,行李廂 400 L。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 車身長 4400 mm,行李廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸差唔多一樣,車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車,日常使用完全夠用。

Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Chery 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔咁同嘅感覺,建議試駕對比。
總括嚟講,Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛,關鍵始終都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再去做最後決定。買車係件大事,花啲時間做功課絕對無錯。

In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers tend to compare the Proton X70 and Honda HR-V when selecting a car. The price and positioning of these two cars are quite similar, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), and so on.
The Honda HR-V's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 115,900 - 143,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), and so on.
From a pricing perspective, the Proton X70 is indeed RM 9,100 cheaper than the Honda HR-V in terms of entry price. If your budget is limited, the entry-level version of the Proton should be enough for daily needs. However, keep in mind that the few thousand ringgit saved might involve trade-offs in features, which depends on your specific requirements.

The Proton X70 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo engine, producing 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
The Honda HR-V is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo engine, producing 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, so the driving feel in daily use is basically no different. Fuel economy is also similar, so there is no need to overthink this point.

The Proton X70 has a body length of 4400 mm and a trunk capacity of 400 L.
The Honda HR-V has a body length of 4500 mm and a trunk capacity of 450 L.
In terms of space, the Honda HR-V is 100 mm longer than the Proton X70, giving it an advantage in passenger space. However, the Proton X70 is a bit more flexible when parking in the city, each has its trade-offs.

Both the Proton X70 and Honda HR-V are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, you might prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both models, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both the Proton X70 and Honda HR-V are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major decision, and taking some time to do research will never go wrong.

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 9 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近,今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比,幫你節省做足功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300,一總共有 4 個版本,包括 1.5T Executive(RM 89,800)、1.5T Premium(RM 101,800)、1.5T Flagship(RM 113,300) 等。
Chery Tiggo 9 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 166,800 - 179,800,一總共有 1 個版本,包括 2026 2.0T Standard(RM 179,750) 等。
由價錢嚟睇,Proton X50 嘅起價確實比 Chery Tiggo 9 平咗 RM 77,000。如果你預算有限,Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但亦都要注意,平嗰幾千蚊,可能喺配備上有取捨,具體就要睇你嘅需要。

Proton X50 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Chery Tiggo 9 嘅安全评分係 TBD,主動安全系統包括 Basic。
喺安全配備方面,兩部車都拿到唔錯嘅評分。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Chery Tiggo 9 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異,如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話,可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。

Proton X50 保修 5 年/150,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 9 保修 3 年/100,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 9 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇,適合家庭用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價,可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款;如果你更在意性價比同配備,那就揀配置更加豐富嗰款。最後都建議兩款都去試駕,親身體驗先係最重要。

總體嚟講,Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 9 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊部,關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議各位做足功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事情,花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Kia Sportage when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Kia Sportage OTR price in Malaysia is RM 129,639 - 179,320, with a total of 4 versions, including 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High (RM 179,320), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High (RM 159,320), 2025 2.0L AT 2WD High (RM 139,639), etc.
Looking at the price, Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 39,839 cheaper than Kia Sportage. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, be aware that the few thousand Ringgit savings may involve compromises on features, depending on your specific requirements.

Proton X50 comes with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Kia Sportage comes with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Kia Sportage's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power and won't feel sluggish.

Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Kia Sportage body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, with little difference in interior space. For cars in this class, it is more than enough for daily use.

Proton X50 adopts 4WD drive system.
Kia Sportage adopts FWD drive system.
Proton's 4WD and Kia's FWD will have different handling experiences, test drive comparison is recommended.

Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Kia Sportage warranty 5 years/300,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.

Overall, Proton X50 and Kia Sportage are both very good car models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then go for a test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research is never wrong.

In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Kia Sportage when selecting a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time doing research.
Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, there are 4 variants in total, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Kia Sportage OTR price in Malaysia is RM 129,639 - 179,320, there are 4 variants in total, including 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High (RM 179,320), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High (RM 159,320), 2025 2.0L AT 2WD High (RM 139,639), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 39,839 cheaper than Kia Sportage. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand dollars saved might mean compromises on features, it depends on your specific needs.

Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Kia Sportage safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Drive Wise.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive for this class. New car safety is not bad nowadays, no need to worry too much about this.

Proton X50 uses 4WD drive system.
Kia Sportage uses FWD drive system.
Proton's 4WD and Kia's FWD will have different driving experiences, a test drive comparison is recommended.

Proton X50 Warranty 5 years/150,000km, Maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Kia Sportage Warranty 5 years/300,000km, Maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.

Both Proton X50 and Kia Sportage are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-effectiveness and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both models, as personal experience is the most important.

Overall, Proton X50 and Kia Sportage are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a major decision, spending some time on research will never go wrong.

In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save the time of doing research.
Proton X50 has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 159,750 - 159,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 130,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 145,000), etc.
From a price perspective, Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 69,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware, the few thousand cheaper price may involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.

Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV is equipped with Hybrid, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 4.5 L/100km.
In terms of power, Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV's Hybrid has 65 more horsepower than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power and you won't feel underpowered.

Proton X50's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV's safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, there are some differences in function between Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV's Basic. If you value active safety, you can compare their feature lists carefully.

Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV are both mainstream choices in the Malaysia market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
In general, Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV are both very good models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose, the key still depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest everyone do their research, compare quotes from several car dealerships, then go test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will definitely not be wrong.

Dalam pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli yang membandingkan Proton X70 dan Honda WR-V ketika memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kereta ini mempunyai harga dan kedudukan yang agak hampir, hari ini kita akan melakukan perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek, membantu anda menjimatkan masa untuk membuat kajian.
Proton X70 mempunyai harga OTR di Malaysia sebanyak RM 106,800 - 122,300, keseluruhan ada 3 varian, termasuk 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), dan lain-lain.
Honda WR-V mempunyai harga OTR di Malaysia sebanyak RM 89,900 - 107,900, keseluruhan ada 4 varian, termasuk 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Honda WR-V RM 16,900 lebih murah daripada Proton X70. Sejujurnya, dalam segmen harga ini, perbezaan beberapa ribu sebenarnya tidak terlalu besar, yang penting adalah nilai keseluruhan dan kos jangka panjang.

Proton X70 dilengkapi enjin 1.5L Turbo, kuasa 140 hp. Penggunaan minyak rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Honda WR-V dilengkapi enjin 1.5L 4-silinder, kuasa 105 hp. Penggunaan minyak rasmi 6.0 L/100km.
Dari segi kuasa, 1.5L Turbo Proton X70 mempunyai 35 kuasa kuda lebih berbanding 1.5L 4-silinder Honda WR-V, pecutan pertengahan lebih yakin, terutamanya semasa memulahan dan menyalip pada lebuhraya. Namun penggunaan minyak Honda WR-V mungkin lebih baik, perbezaan untuk komuter harian di bandar tidak akan terlalu besar.

Penarafan keselamatan Proton X70 ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Penarafan keselamatan Honda WR-V ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk Honda SENSING.
Penarafan keselamatan kedua-dua kereta adalah sama, dalam kategori ini kelengkapan keselamatan dianggap cukup lengkap. Keselamatan kereta baru sekarang tidak buruk, tidak perlu terlalu bimbang tentang hal ini.

Proton X70 panjang kenderaan 4400 mm, ruang bagasi 400 L.
Honda WR-V panjang kenderaan 4400 mm, ruang bagasi 400 L.
Saiz kedua-dua kereta hampir sama, ruang dalam kenderaan perbezaan tidak besar. Kereta dalam kategori ini, untuk penggunaan harian sudah cukup.
Proton X70 menggunakan cara pemacu FWD.
Honda WR-V menggunakan cara pemacu FWD.
Kaedah pemacu kedua-dua kereta sama, semua FWD, perbezaan perasa memandu harian tidak akan terlalu besar.
Keseluruhannya, Proton X70 dan Honda WR-V kedua-duanya adalah model kereta yang sangat bagus di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih mana satu, yang penting bergantung kepada keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Cadangan kami, sila buat kajian, bandingkan beberapa tawaran daripada penjual kereta, kemudian buat ujian jalan untuk keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah hal besar, meluangkan masa untuk membuat kajian pasti tidak salah.


More shocking than CATL's performance is the provision of 76.1 billion "return" to shareholders -- dividend of 36.1 billion + buyback of 40 billion and cancellation.
On July 24, CATL released another outstanding half-year performance report.In the first half of 2026, CATL achieved operating revenue of 276.9 billion CNY,year-on-year increase of 54.8%; net profit attributable to shareholders of the parent company 43.28 billion CNY, year-on-year increase of 42.0%; basic earnings per share 9.51 yuan, year-on-year increase of 37.4%. This performance basically reached the upper limit of market expectations.

What shocked the market even more is,the company simultaneously launched a huge A-share buyback cancellation plan of 20 billion to 40 billion yuan.For comparison, according to Wind data, approximately 700 listed companies in the A-share market implemented share buybacks in the first half of 2026, with a cumulative buyback amount of approximately 65 billion yuan. The scale of CATL's buyback is evident from this.
However, interestingly, on one hand, CATL is doing a large buyback in the A-share market; on the other hand, it is also conducting equity financing as high as 39.1 billion HKD in the HK market, and issuing low-cost green tech innovation bonds with a limit of 40 billion yuan.
The reason is also simple,conducting A-share shareholder returns with domestic cash to solidify domestic market reputation; obtaining overseas financing through the HK market and issuing low-interest bonds for domestic and overseas expansion. The two sums of money have two uses, perfectly balancing expansion and shareholder returns. In addition, A-share buybacks can also hedge the equity dilution brought by H-share placement.
01
Energy Storage Business Booms, Second Growth Pole Maturing
Looking at the income statement, what is most worth paying attention to at CATL is not the steady growth of power batteries, but the continuous boom of energy storage business.
In the first half, power battery system revenue was 192.1 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 46%, gross margin 20.63%, a slight decline year-on-year but still healthy. But the real focus is on energy storage battery systems -- revenue reached 53.26 billion yuan, a year-on-year surge of 87.54%, the growth rate being almost twice that of power business. Energy storage revenue accounts for 19.2% of total revenue.

At the investor meeting, CATL disclosed more granular data:The combined sales volume of power and energy storage batteries in the first half increased by about 60% year-on-year, of which the proportion of energy storage battery sales has reached about 1/4, and the proportion of energy storage systems (not just cells) is close to 70%.
On the product level, 587Ah large capacity dedicated energy storage cells have achieved large-scale delivery, and the supporting 6.25MWh Tianheng energy storage systems and the world's first nearly 9MWh TENER Stack super-large capacity systems continue to mass-produce. The company also signed a 3-year, total scale of 60GWh sodium-ion battery energy storage strategic cooperation agreement with Hopewind.
02
Global Market Share Rises Against the Trend, Overseas Footprint Accelerates Expansion
Against the backdrop of trade tensions and complexifying geopolitics, CATL's global market share has risen instead of falling, which is truly rare.
According to SNE Research data, from January to May 2026, CATL's global power battery market share reached 40.2%, up 2.2 percentage points year-on-year, ranking first globally for nine consecutive years. In overseas markets (excluding China), the company's market share was 33.7%, up 3.7 percentage points year-on-year.

European market is an important incremental source.In the first half of 2026, new energy passenger car sales in Europe reached 2.351 million vehicles, a year-on-year increase of 31.7%, and penetration rate rose to 32.5%. CATL deeply supplies top overseas automakers such as Volkswagen, Stellantis, BMW, Volvo, Toyota, etc., and the Hungary factory and Spanish joint venture factory are steadily advancing, and localization delivery capabilities continue to enhance.
CATL also won bids for multiple energy storage system integration projects in countries such as Germany, Spain, Chile, Malaysia, and Australia, and overseas energy storage business is replicating the success path of power batteries.
Performance data shows,CATL's overseas revenue reached 87.1 billion yuan, accounting for 31.46% of revenue, a year-on-year increase of 42.35%.
03
High Potential Areas: AIDC and Sodium Batteries
If power and energy storage are CATL's "present", then AI Data Centers (AIDC) and sodium batteries are the "future".
Currently, global AI computing power demand is surging, and AIDC power guarantee and energy efficiency management have become a rigid demand. CATL has laid out AIDC full-scenario energy solutions, covering power generation side, medium voltage distribution side to inside the data center, which can address challenges such as compute-intensive and large load fluctuations.
It should be noted that AIDC demand is tied to global AI computing power investment, and currently this field is in an explosive phase. Company investor relations records also clearly state: "The rapid development of AI globally has driven requirements for AI-related infrastructure, such as AIDC, with huge future potential."CATL has entered a new trillion-level AI infrastructure track by selling batteries.
In addition, CATL's deeply deployed sodium batteries have already borne fruit. However, the market still focuses on the cost competitiveness of sodium batteries compared to lithium batteries. The company responded that after scaled production, sodium batteries have certain advantages in material costs compared to lithium iron phosphate batteries under current lithium carbonate prices, and possess differentiated characteristics such as wide temperature range adaptation, excellent low-temperature performance, and long life.Currently, the production line can achieve flexible lithium-sodium switching, and customers have sequentially signed contracts.
04
CATL Buyback History: From 2 Billion to 40 Billion
Another noteworthy point is CATL's 40 billion buyback cancellation this time. To understand this buyback, we need to first look at the market environment it is situated in.
Firstly, it needs to be stated that CATL's buyback at this point in time is not an isolated case.
According to Wind data statistics, in the first half of 2026, approximately 700 listed companies in the A-share market implemented share buybacks, with a cumulative buyback share quantity of approximately 5.06 billion shares, and a cumulative buyback amount of approximately 65 billion yuan. "Cancellation-style buyback" has also evolved from scattered cases into an increasingly common choice.
This is because, since 2026, the A-share market overall has presented a volatile pattern. In the first half of the year, the Shanghai Composite Index repeatedly pulled between 3,000 and 3,300 points, market sentiment was biased towards caution, and investor attention on listed company profitability quality and shareholder returns rose to unprecedented levelsThe regulatory layer is also continuously guiding listed companies to enhance investment value through dividends, buybacks, etc., conveying long-term bullish signals, further solidifying market bottom confidence.
Back to the lithium battery sector, the situation is more complex. From an industry fundamentals perspective, new energy vehicle penetration and energy storage demand remain strong, but capital market expectations often run ahead.In the peak period of 2021, the lithium battery sector index PE ratio once exceeded 100 times. However, with the emergence of capacity surplus worries, lithium carbonate prices dropped sharply from historical highs, and US and Europe trade barriers continued to increase, sector valuation experienced a long digestion process over the past few years.
Later, in late 2025, with the correction of lithium carbonate prices, lithium battery sector companies regained vitality.
On May 7, 2026, CATL A-share stock price surged again to a near-year high of 468.75 yuan, and was subsequently affected by factors such as concentrated institutional rebalancing (capital flowing to AI computing power tracks) and continuous foreign capital reduction, the stock price continued to fall. The company itself admitted in investor exchanges:"There has been certain volatility in the capital market recently, and the company's stock price has also fallen"—this directly explains the trigger for this round of buybacks.
This upper limit 40 billion yuan A-share largest scale cancellation-style buyback directly conveys a "stock price is undervalued" signal to the market, effectively hedging the selling pressure brought by previous concentrated institutional reductions, and driving market cap to repair quickly.
Looking back at CATL's buyback history, we can clearly see an "evolution" trajectory:
First time: October 2023, CATL launched the first round of buyback plan,proposed using 2 billion to 3 billion yuan to buyback shares, buyback purpose is to implement equity incentive plan or employee stock ownership plan.This round of buyback was completed in 2024 implementation,actual funds used were approximately 2.7 billion yuan. This was CATL's first attempt at buyback in the capital market.

Source: CATL New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. announcement on share buyback results
Second time: April 2025 to April 2026,the company announced it proposed using not less than 4 billion yuan and not more than 8 billion yuan to buyback A-shares.This round of buyback concluded successfully in April 2026, cumulative buyback shares 15,990,782 shares,total transaction amount 4.386 billion yuan, highest transaction price 317.63 yuan/share, lowest transaction price 231.50 yuan/share. But the purpose is still for equity incentive or employee stock ownership plan, no cancellation.

Source: CATL New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. announcement on A-share buyback results and share changes
Third time: July 2026,CATL announced it proposed using not less than 20 billion yuan and not more than 40 billion yuan to buyback shares, and clearly stated it will cancel the bought-back shares to reduce registered capital.

This is the company's first large-scale buyback for the purpose of cancellation in its history, the amount is 5-10 times the second round, nearly 20 times the first round.
Incentive-style buyback distributes value to employees, cancellation-style buyback returns value to all shareholders. The former is a management tool, the latter is a capital commitment.From 2 billion to 40 billion, from incentive to cancellation, CATL conveyed a clear signal to the market: the company is willing to convert profits into tangible returns for all shareholders.

Of course, the confidence for this large dividend comes from massive cash reserves. CATL market company cash on books as high as 372 billion yuan, in the first half of 2026 only interim dividend reached 6.493 billion yuan, annual dividend (including special dividend) total reached 36.1 billion yuan, free cash flow is sufficient. In addition to H-share placement completion, overseas financing channels are further broadened, providing sufficient ammunition for large-scale buyback.

Di pasaran SUV Malaysia, ramai pembeli akan membandingkan Proton X50 dan Subaru Forester ketika memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kereta ini memiliki harga dan kedudukan pasaran yang cukup hampir, hari ini kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek, membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Harga OTR Proton X50 di Malaysia adalah RM 89,800 - 113,300, terdapat 4 varian, termasuk 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Subaru Forester di Malaysia adalah RM 174,000 - 197,000, terdapat 3 varian, termasuk 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition (RM 189,538), 2024 2.0L S EyeSight (RM 177,538), 2024 2.0L L EyeSight (RM 167,538) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X50 memang lebih murah RM 84,200 berbanding Subaru Forester. Jika bajet anda terhad, varian permulaan Proton sudah cukup memenuhi keperluan harian. Namun, perlu diingat, beberapa ribu ringgit yang lebih murah itu, mungkin ada kompromi dalam peralatan, bergantung pada keperluan anda.

Proton X50 dilengkapkan enjin 1.5L 4-silinder, kuasa 105 hp. Penggunaan minyak rasmi 6.0 L/100km.
Subaru Forester dilengkapkan enjin 2.0L 4-silinder, kuasa 170 hp. Penggunaan minyak rasmi 8.0 L/100km.
Dari segi kuasa, enjin 2.0L 4-silinder Subaru Forester mempunyai 65 hp lebih banyak berbanding enjin 1.5L 4-silinder Proton X50. Namun, untuk penggunaan harian di bandar, kuasa kedua-dua kereta sudah mencukupi dan tidak akan terasa kurang tenaga.

Penilaian keselamatan Proton X50 ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Penilaian keselamatan Subaru Forester ialah 5★ (Euro NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk EyeSight.
Dari segi peralatan keselamatan, kedua-dua kereta telah mendapat penilaian yang baik. Namun, ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) pada Proton X50 dan EyeSight pada Subaru Forester mempunyai perbezaan dari segi fungsi, jika anda lebih mengutamakan keselamatan aktif, anda boleh membandingkan senarai fungsi kedua-dua sistem dengan teliti.

Proton X50 menggunakan sistem penggerak 4WD.
Subaru Forester menggunakan sistem penggerak FWD.
Sistem penggerak 4WD pada Proton dan FWD pada Subaru akan memberikan rasa pengendalian yang berbeza, disyorkan untuk membandingkan dengan memandu uji.

Proton X50 dan Subaru Forester adalah pilihan utama di pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga dan perjalanan harian. Jika anda lebih mengutamakan reputasi jenama dan harga kedua, pertimbangkan yang mempunyai reputasi lebih baik; jika anda lebih memberi tumpuan kepada nisbah harga dan peralatan, pilih yang lebih kaya dengan spesifikasi. Akhir sekali, disyorkan untuk memandu uji kedua-duanya, pengalaman sendiri adalah yang paling penting.

Secara keseluruhannya, Proton X50 dan Subaru Forester adalah model kereta yang sangat bagus di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana satu, semuanya bergantung pada keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Disyorkan agar anda membuat kajian, bandingkan banyak kutipan harga dari beberapa kedai kereta, kemudian buat keputusan akhir selepas memandu uji. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa untuk kajian pasti tidak akan salah.

In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Hyundai Tucson when choosing a car. These two cars are quite similar in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X50's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Hyundai Tucson's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 143,888 - 197,888, with a total of 5 versions, including 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige (RM 197,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige (RM 186,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime (RM 164,888), etc.
In terms of price, Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 54,088 cheaper than Hyundai Tucson. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.

Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl engine, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.
Hyundai Tucson is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo engine, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Hyundai Tucson's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power and won't feel weak.

Proton X50 body length is 4400 mm, trunk capacity is 400 L.
Hyundai Tucson body length is 4400 mm, trunk capacity is 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, and the interior space difference is not significant. For this class of cars, it is fully sufficient for daily use.

Proton X50 adopts a 4WD drive mode.
Hyundai Tucson adopts an FWD drive mode.
Proton's 4WD and Hyundai's FWD will have different handling experiences. A test drive comparison is recommended.

Proton X50 and Hyundai Tucson are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation. If you value value for money and features more, choose the one with richer configuration. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.

Overall, Proton X50 and Hyundai Tucson are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. Everyone is advised to do research, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research is never wrong.

由於中東嗰邊眾所周知嘅原因,2026 年 F1 原訂嘅 24 場比賽計劃中巴林同沙地站已經確定取消,最後兩站卡塔爾同阿布扎比嘅辦賽希望亦變得更加渺茫。

有傳言指 F1 同部分合作夥伴嘅合約入面有一項 2026 年最少舉辦 21 場比賽嘅「保底條款」,一旦中東四站全部取消嘅話那就係個大麻煩,所以一直都有消息話 F1 方面喺搵合適嘅賽道加賽一場。而喺上上個週末 F1 匈牙利站期間,佢哋終於宣佈將於 10 月 2 日至 10 月 4 日期間,喺馬來西亞雪邦賽道加賽一場,但係呢場大獎賽嘅名稱好特別:F1 巴林大獎賽馬來西亞站。

馬來西亞雪邦賽道喺好久之前列 F1 嘅正式分站之一,上一次承辦 F1 比賽係 2017 年。相隔 9 年點解雪邦會「限時復出」,點解馬來西亞嘅比賽會同巴林扯上關係,入面真係有唔少說頭。
時間、空間都合適嘅「超級替補」
講下點解會揀選馬來西亞雪邦賽道。F1 今次揀加賽場地嘅核心原則就係:唔影響既定分站計劃,有快速組織辦賽能力。喺之前嘅傳言中共有三種方案:喺葡萄牙、西班牙等歐洲賽道補賽;年底拉斯維加斯雙連賽收官;馬來西亞雪邦補賽。

按照原訂賽歷,F1 經過 7 至 8 月嘅夏休期之後,8 月底同 9 月初喺荷蘭、意大利同西班牙再比三站就會離開歐洲大陸前往亞洲同美洲,如此短嘅時間內喺歐洲組織一场比赛難度實在太高。至於 9 月之後讓 11 支車隊喺亞歐美三大洲之間來回奔波亦唔現實,所以歐洲補賽呢條路線基本可以 PASS 晒。

而年底拉斯維加斯雙連賽呢套方案唔講人家願唔願意出兩份承辦費,單就時間都唔知幾遲,要到 11 月底。中間再發生啲咩變故件事就會更加複雜,所以拉斯維加斯雙連賽嘅方案只能講係下策。

而雪邦恰恰就係時間同空間都合適嘅選擇。10 月 2 日至 10 月 4 日嘅辦賽時間距離而家仲有兩個幾月,足夠完成辦賽組織。空間上,馬來西亞緊鄰住下一站舉辦地新加坡,物流上面都好調度。

關鍵係雪邦賽道呢幾年雖然唔承辦 F1,但係諸如 MOTO GP 等頂級賽事依舊喺承辦,賽道仍然保留 FIA 一級賽道資格,比起嗰啲多年唔辦賽,需要翻新嘅歐洲老賽道方便好過好多。
巴林出錢,馬來西亞辦事
至於馬來西亞嘅比賽點解係巴林冠名?簡單嚟講就係巴林出錢,馬來西亞辦事。而家就要講返當年馬來西亞退出 F1 賽歷嘅原因:錢。

當年馬來西亞退出 F1 嘅原因簡單嚟講就係佢哋覺得入不敷出。高額嘅承辦費同由比賽帶嚟嘅門票、旅遊等附加收入比較唔成正比。之後馬來西亞方面也多次表示唔排斥 F1,但係前提係承辦費得有人出錢,件事就僵持喺呢度啦。

而今次馬來西亞等到嗰個唔使愁錢嘅金主:巴林。對於呢個中東產油大國嚟講,錢從來唔係問題,問題係佢哋想維持 F1 嘅曝光。既然自己屋企暫時辦唔到,嗰出錢換個地方冠名比賽都唔係唔得。
對於馬來西亞嚟講,承辦費有人出錢,由此衍生嘅旅遊等收入那就係白賺。所以 F1 方面一撮合,前無古人後亦未必有來者嘅「F1 巴林大獎賽馬來西亞站」就咁搞掂啦。
中國車迷嘅「天降巨富」:唔使請假仲免簽
馬來西亞回歸 F1,最高興嘅莫過於中國車迷。今次馬來西亞站嘅時機真係好得不得了。

對於想現場睇波嘅車迷,馬來西亞站比賽卡喺十一期間,唔使額外請假。而且馬來西亞對我哋免簽,距離亦唔遠機票價格相對平宜,現場睇波無論係時間成本定係經濟成本都相當友好。

就算唔去現場喺屋企睇直播,馬來西亞站都相當友好。馬來西亞同中國喺時區上面同屬東八區,冇時差問題,而且馬來西亞亦唔似新加坡咁搞夜賽。這就代表你喺屋企瞓個自然醒,下午舒舒服服睇完比賽,晚上再同朋友出去食飯乜都唔耽誤。而且馬來西亞多雨,每逢落雨比賽總能夠出到啲精彩場面,喺屋企舒舒服服睇完比賽,晚上再同朋友食飯傾下比賽精彩場面,多好。
不過,雪邦今次嘅「限時回歸」係一個天時地利人和齊齊湊埋嘅巧合,之後仲有冇真係難講,所以真係想去現場嘅朋友準備好搶票啦,過咗今年呢個村,明年真係唔知有無呢間店啦。
