Homenatural
Search History
Popular Searches
Dealer Login / Sign Up
昨日，廣汽集團喺廣汽傳祺工廠舉行 3000 萬用戶感恩活動，正式迎嚟第 3000 萬位用戶嘅里程碑時刻。從首輛整車下線到呢個歷史性節點，廣汽經歷咗 29 年嘅風雨兼程。呢 3000 萬嘅數字，唔單只代表住千萬用戶嘅選擇同信任，更係廣汽長期堅守品質安全、堅定向電動化同智能化轉型嘅縮影。活動現場，廣東省同廣州市有關領導、行業協會代表、合作夥伴同海內外車主共同見證，定格咗中國汽車工業從規模擴張邁向價值躍升嘅高光時刻。
活動現場連線全球多座生產基地，廣汽本田 P7、廣汽豐田铂智 7、廣汽埃安 N60 等多款新能源車型依次下線，構成全線新能源矩陣。最終，一輛右舵版廣汽傳祺 M8 PHEV 作為第 3000 萬輛整車駛下生產線，並交付畀泰國車主 Tony Jaa，生動演繹咗廣汽同全球用戶嘅“雙向奔赴”。今年上半年，廣汽海外出口突破 12 萬輛，同比大增 132%，新能源汽車銷量同比增長 68.8%。喺全球汽車行業深度重塑期，廣汽以穩健嘅節奏同亮眼嘅轉型成果，展現咗突圍變局嘅底氣。
“品質係廣汽永遠唔會讓渡嘅底線。”廣汽集團董事長馮興亞喺致辭中強調。多年來，廣汽融合本田全面質量管理、豐田精益生產方式同嶺南文化，構建咗以“融合創新”為中心嘅質量管理模式。每款新車上市前均需經歷高寒、高溫、高原等極端環境測試同嚴苛嘅路試驗證。廣汽埃安智能生態工廠作為“全球首個新能源汽車燈塔工廠”，以數字化保障咗量產品質嘅穩定。同時，星靈安全守護體系同彈匣電池等核心技術嘅應用，配合行業首創嘅“三擔責”政策，為用戶撐起咗堅實嘅安全防線。
廣汽始終將“人為本”嘅理念融入發展基因。為傾聽用戶心聲，廣汽常態化舉辦“用戶全開麥”活動，建立全流程閉環管理機制，確保用戶訴求件件有回應。喺渠道端，廣汽加速服務網絡下沉縣域，計劃年內新增 1000 家授權門店；喺服務端，上線“超級管家”實現 5 秒響應、2 小時辦結。此外，廣汽建設“9 縱 10 橫”補能網絡，自營充電樁超 2.7 萬根，核心城區實現“直線 1 公里必有站”，用實際行動消除咗用戶嘅用車焦慮。
站喺新起點，廣汽累計超 620 億元嘅研發投入正轉化為用戶可感知嘅價值。動力領域嘅星源動力覆蓋三大技術路線，確保全場景性能穩定；“三電”領域，全固態電池中試產線已建成，夸克電驅電機效率突破行業最高水平。智能聯網方面，星靈架構同星河智艙持續進化，實現“一個大腦統一指揮”。廣汽仲攜手華為、寧德時代等頂尖夥伴共建 AI 智能生態，正推動產品從代步工具向智能出行夥伴加速進化。
為感謝 3000 萬用戶嘅長期支持，廣汽正式啟動“3000 萬輛下線·煥新感恩季”，旗下六大乘用車品牌將推出特色政策回饋市場。面向未來，廣汽將以用戶需求為錨點，以品質為根基，以科技創新為核心驅動，加速向生態型科技企業進階。廣汽將同更多用戶並肩同行，喺智能、綠色、廣闊嘅未來道路上彼此成就，共同書寫中國汽車工業從大到強嘅嶄新篇章。
7月16日，广汽集团3000万用户感恩活动在广汽传祺工厂举行。广东省、广州市、番禺区有关领导，中国汽车工业协会常务副会长兼秘书长付炳锋，广汽集团董事长冯兴亚、总经理閤先庆等领导班子成员，行业合作伙伴、供应商和经销商代表以及海内外车主代表、员工代表、媒体代表等共同出席，一起见证广汽迎来第3000万位用户的里程碑时刻。
活动现场，广汽全球多座生产基地同步连线，广汽本田P7、广汽丰田铂智7、启境GT7、广汽埃安N60、广汽昊铂S600分别作为广汽第29999995到第29999999辆车依次下线。最后，右舵版广汽传祺M8 PHEV作为第3000万辆整车在现场舞台闪亮登场。全线新能源下线车型矩阵的集体亮相，成为广汽全速推进电动化、智能化转型的直观印证。
随后，冯兴亚将第3000万辆车的车钥匙交到泰国车主Tony Jaa先生的手中，这一刻定格的不只是一个数字，更是广汽与全球用户“双向奔赴”的温情见证。
这份跨越山海的信任，正是广汽在行业变局中突围的底气。今年上半年，广汽集团销量77.31万辆，同比增长2.35%，其中新能源汽车销量同比增长68.8%；海外出口突破12万辆，同比大增132%，在行业深度重塑期跑出了稳健的节奏。
“品质是广汽永远不会让渡的底线。”冯兴亚在总结致辞中表示。在广汽的发展中，规模增长始终以品质为底色。从研发端到制造端，广汽建立了全链条严苛的品质管控体系：每款新车上市前均需经过高寒、高温、高原、高湿、高腐、山区、沙尘等“五高一山一尘”极端环境测试，完成“两冬一夏”实地路试；借助试验场、实验室覆盖整车12个大项、1500余项验证子项，实现体系化品质校验；广汽埃安智能生态工厂作为“全球首个新能源汽车灯塔工厂”，以数字化智能制造体系保障量产品质稳定。
在核心安全技术层面，星灵安全守护体系构建四大防护维度，八大关键系统采用双冗余设计，已守护近200万用户，规避628万次潜在出行风险；弹匣电池累计装车150万辆，安全行驶里程超1600亿公里；服务端同步加码保障，广汽在行业内率先推出自主品牌“三担责”政策，针对用户关注的电池与智能驾驶辅助问题主动兜底，打消用户用车顾虑。正是这一道道安全防线与一项项服务承诺，撑起了广汽3000万销量背后的品牌底气。
“用户在意的，我们放在心上；用户期盼的，我们全力以赴。”冯兴亚表示，这份以用户为中心的理念，早已深深融入广汽集团的发展基因。多年来，广汽集团始终秉持“人为本、信为道、创为先”的企业理念，其中“人为本”的核心要义，正是以用户为本。
一方面，为直面问题、倾听用户心声，广汽常态化举办用户全开麦活动，把用户请到“家里”，面对面交流。同时，成立专属用户洞察部门、推进问题从发现到解决的全流程变革，从组织机制上保障用户诉求件件有回应、事事有着落。
另一方面，服务网络同步加速渗透。在渠道端，推进服务网络下沉县域，年内计划新增建设1000家县域授权门店；在响应端，上线“超级管家”服务，实现5秒响应、2小时诉求办结，保障用户诉求直达快办。在补能端，建设“9纵10横”补能网络，已覆盖全国31个省份213座城市，核心城区实现“直线1公里必有站”，自营充电桩数量超2.7万根，其中超充桩突破2万根，为新能源车主提供便捷的补能服务。
本次感恩活动的核心主旨正是向3000万用户的长期支持致以诚挚回馈与感谢。活动现场，冯兴亚宣布，即日起，广汽正式启动“广汽集团3000万辆下线·焕新感恩季”，广汽本田、广汽丰田、广汽传祺、广汽埃安、广汽昊铂和启境汽车六大乘用车品牌，将围绕新购、置换到增购等分别推出特色政策，回馈每一份的陪伴与支持。
Momenta's listing is not only a critical moment for itself, but also a public defense for the entire autonomous driving and Physical AI industry.
Author | Intelligent Driving Network Ling Jiang Yu Lai
Editor | Langlang Mountain and Zhiming Mountain
After He Xiaopeng declared GX the first Physical AI car, and Li Xiang called the new L9 an Embodied AI flagship, Volkswagen suddenly realized that smart cars and autonomous driving are no longer the hot celebrities that make people excited and flocking in the capital market.
Yesterday was a sweetie, today is an old wife.
Momenta instantly abandoned the outdated concept of autonomous driving and, as the first Physical AI stock, encountered a surge in subscription in the capital market.
On July 8, Momenta officially listed on the HKEX, opening at 301 HKD, higher than the offer price of 295.6 HKD/share. The intraday high touched 314.80 HKD, with market cap breaking 70 billion HKD at one point, and fell back to around 299 HKD at the end of trading.
Due to the public offering of Momenta receiving 414 times excess subscription, its Green Shoe option will likely be fully exercised. This means it will issue about 22.93 million shares, with total raised funds reaching about 6.8 billion HKD, exceeding its initial estimate of 5.89 billion HKD by nearly 1 billion HKD.
One point the Momenta team is proud of is that it has received high favor from international capital. The international offering part received institutional orders exceeding 100 billion HKD, covering sovereign funds and long-term funds from 15 countries and regions.
Including Singapore Government Investment Corporation (GIC), Fidelity International, BlackRock Group, Franklin Templeton, Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA), Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB), Temasek, Wellington, Schroders, and other global top institutions.
Before listing, the 14 cornerstone investors introduced by Momenta had a lineup that can be called luxurious, with subscription amounting to about 3 billion HKD, exceeding half of its total fundraising.
Such craziness, is this the craze triggered by the first Physical AI stock?
Obviously, it is not that simple.
01.
Cooling Intelligent Driving and Heating 'Physical AI'
A particularly dramatic aspect is that on July 8, five companies rang the bell at HKEX simultaneously, one of which was an autonomous driving company Yikong Smart Driving with a positioning close to Momenta, both are enterprises invested by NIO Capital.
The two enterprises played different scripts during the IPO stage and the first day of listing.
Yikong Smart Driving faces mining area autonomous driving. Compared to Momenta, the scale is very small. Compared to Momenta's fixed price model, its offering interval was set at 81.16 to 87.92 HKD, but it ultimately also realized pricing at the upper limit.
Compared to Momenta's huge popularity, in the pre-market trading the night before listing, its average transaction price was 87.07 HKD. Not only was it lower than the offer price, but intraday it once fell nearly 20%, and the closing gain was only 4%, with volatility close to 25%, showing clear divergence between bulls and bears.
But after officially listing on July 8, compared to Momenta opening high but falling in the afternoon, where it once fell below the offer price, Yikong Smart Driving ultimately recorded a 9.99% increase over the offer price, with total market cap reaching 14.299 billion HKD.
Without the support of the Physical AI concept, both Yikong Smart Driving and Momenta failed to achieve profitability. Both are still deeply trapped in losses, with no clear profitability schedule yet. The capital market's enthusiasm and bearishness for the two companies both focus on the future.
Is the concept of autonomous driving really outdated?
In terms of financing amount, Momenta, holding the most mass production clients, did not exceed Pony.ai's 7.7 billion HKD financing when it IPOed on HKEX last year, but it was higher than Horizon Robotics which is布局ing both chips and algorithms.
But under the flood of AI, the stock prices of these listed intelligent driving companies have mostly halved compared to the offer price.
The decline in the heat of the intelligent driving concept in the capital market is also a fact.
But undeniably, what makes Momenta's future more tangible, and what has more imagination space is still its position established in the passenger vehicle market.
02.
The Terrifying 70% Gross Margin
The 71.6% gross margin announced in the prospectus released by Momenta before listing once triggered a dispute between car companies and Momenta.
In the automotive industry, it is generally believed that Huawei Qiankun is too expensive, so they turn to embrace Intelligent Driving companies known for cost-effectiveness like Zhuoyu and Momenta. They didn't expect their gross margins to actually exceed 50%!
In comparison, the most successful traditional car company now, BYD with Dilyan protection, has a gross margin of only 18.81%, Xiaomi Auto is 20.1%, the most successful in Harmony Intelligent Mobility is Seres with a gross margin of 26.24%. The gross margins of Chinese automotive companies are generally below 15%, some even hovering in single digits. In the industry chain end, CATL, once considered a thorn in the eye, also saw its gross margin at just 24.82% in the first quarter this year.
The logic behind this is actually not complex. Comparing the gross margins of manufacturing with software companies is comparing apples and oranges.
Horizon Robotics, in the same track as Momenta, had a 64.5% gross margin in 2025 (comprehensive gross margin of chips + intelligent driving solutions), WeRide's gross margin is also close to 30%, and Pony.ai is only 15.7%, which is related to its high production operations for Robotaxi and R&D investment.
And Momenta's ultra-high gross margin lies in its about to cross the break-even point.
Momenta's revenue increased from 743 million yuan in 2023 to 2.413 billion yuan in 2025. Gross margin was also gradually improved from 17.5% to 71.6%. R&D investment in 2025 was 1.87 billion yuan, accounting for 77.5% of revenue.
Financial Indicators (Thousand RMB)
2023
2024
2025
Operating Revenue
742,745
1,324,688
2,412,523
Gross Margin
17.5%
49.0%
71.6%
R&D Expenses
(1,281,138)
(1,508,270)
(1,868,906)
Net Loss on Books
(2,570,342)
(3,205,730)
(3,457,912)
Change in Fair Value of Preferred Shares
(1,190,108)
(1,967,501)
(2,842,919)
Adjusted Net Loss (Non-IFRS)
(1,093,037)
(959,204)
(302,804)
Although net losses are still expanding, from 570 million, 3.21 billion to 3.46 billion, but if share-based payments and other factors are excluded, the adjusted loss has narrowed from 1.09 billion yuan in 2023 to 300 million yuan in 2025. By the end of 2025, the company's cash reserves exceeded 10 billion yuan.
The signals transmitted by these numbers are very clear:
Momenta has not yet profited, but it is no longer a pure R&D company living solely on financing. It is a company with fast revenue growth, fast improvement in gross margin, and a business model that has been understood by the market.
On the eve of listing, Momenta announced that its mass production delivery scale broke through 1 million units, successfully delivered more than 100 models, with cumulative designated models exceeding 210 models. Among the top 10 global car companies, 9 have cooperated with it.
In the intelligent driving market, especially high-end intelligent driving, the only enterprise truly comparable to Momenta in scale is Huawei Qiankun.
Regarding high gross margin, Momenta's own explanation is that its revenue composition is roughly divided into two parts:
Technical development services, which means customizing intelligent driving solutions adapted to car manufacturers;
Software licensing, which means collecting intelligent driving system usage fees based on sales volume after model mass production.
The former is related to the number of cooperation models with Momenta, while the latter is linked to model sales volume.
In 2025, Momenta's technical development service revenue was 1.45 billion yuan, and software licensing revenue was 970 million yuan. In 2023, its technical service development revenue share exceeded 90%. Just two years later, its software licensing revenue share has already reached 40.1%.
Software licensing revenue is a business model where marginal cost approaches zero, requiring not too much labor cost, akin to 'lying down to collect money', which significantly raises Momenta's gross margin.
Momenta's gross margin has quadrupled in the past three years. The 71.6% gross margin in 2025 has reached the level of software company SaaS companies. This is exactly the technical compound interest that intelligent driving companies dream of: after a system matures, it can be rapidly replicated in the market.
Momenta CEO Cao Xudong stated: 'Autonomous driving has very strong scale effects and first-mover advantages. Its effect is stronger than the chip industry. Autonomous driving is software, and marginal cost is zero, so its scale effect is stronger.'
However, this model is not unique to Momenta. Inthe increasingly competitive intelligent driving supplier market today, many intelligent driving companies have combined technical development models and software licensing models to provide or develop their intelligent driving solutions for OEMs at zero cost.
Providing solutions to OEMs at below their own cost has been going on for years.
In comparison, Momenta has to some extent established its own moat. This moat is the dual connection of capital and technology established with many car manufacturers.
In the cooperation between Momenta and 24 global vehicle manufacturers, it covers nine of the top 10 global vehicle groups (such as Mercedes-Benz, Toyota, BMW China, etc.) and all of China's top 10 vehicle manufacturers.
Among these users, 7 car manufacturers with global influence, including SAIC, GM, Mercedes-Benz, Toyota, BYD, Hyundai, Chery, etc., are all investors of Momenta.
Mercedes-Benz and BYD even became cornerstone investors in Momenta's IPO.
In the industry chain end, it covers Bosch, Desay SV, Luxshare. Mobility platforms include Uber, Grab, Stone Venture, etc. Tech giants include Tencent, Alibaba Cloud, Ant Group, JD, etc.
IM Motors has achieved two-way shareholding with Momenta. SAIC Motor is Momenta's largest institutional shareholder, and Momenta also holds shares in IM Motors.
A case often cited by Momenta is that from Mercedes-Benz investing in Momenta in 2017 to mass production at the end of 2025, it took exactly 8 years. But once breakthrough is achieved, it is almost one step to the goal: Momenta obtained all of Mercedes-Benz's electric car and oil car business in 2024.
Momenta is replicating CATL and car companies achieving two-way deep binding in various ways in the intelligent driving field, letting car manufacturers participate in its profit growth.
However, OEMs have always been powerful. BYD not only invested in Momenta but also deeply invested in Zhuoyu. Moreover, at the sensitive moment of Momenta's IPO, Wang Chuanfu and Horizon Robotics founder Yu Kai being classmates triggered speculation from the outside world.
Car manufacturers represented by BYD and Chery, on one hand, have cooperated with almost all intelligent driving suppliers. On the other hand, they are still investing huge funds in self-research.
70% gross margin is indeed an irresistible temptation. After the technical route converges, all teams seem to see that the endgame of intelligent driving is not far away.
'Horizon, Zhuoyu, Huawei, and Baidu' are not only dividing spheres of influence around global OEMs, but also turning around to guard against OEM self-research substitution.
This scene has already played out once in the intelligent driving chip field. This year, self-developed chips from NIO, Xpeng, and Li Auto have been mass-produced and installed on vehicles. As a local star company in this market, Horizon Robotics' stock experienced a halving-style plunge.
'Physical AI' is such a new narrative told to both OEMs and the capital market.
From 'Autonomous Driving Solution Supplier' to 'Physical AI Foundation Model Constructor', this is not a choice of Momenta alone, but a common choice of almost all intelligent driving suppliers.
03.
'Physical AI' Hides the Ambition of a Platform Company
Essentially, autonomous driving is physical AI, and physical AI is the intelligent driving of all things. There is no difference between the two.
It is just that Physical AI opens up the imagination space for capital. It accurately describes a clear vision for an intelligent driving company to move from a one-dimensional supplier relying on OEMs to a higher-dimensional AI platform company.
Physical AI, a concept popularized by Jensen Huang, is relative to Digital AI. In the red sea competition of Digital AI, intelligent driving companies become the pioneers of Physical AI. For some top players, they also have data and scale advantages.
Momenta is undoubtedly an outstanding player in both fields. Momenta stated that it has run through data and business scaling through 1 million mass-produced vehicles.
And the time for Momenta to confidently build the world foundation model has matured. It is NVIDIA's launched world model that is evolving from a simulation tool for intelligent driving companies to a main model that generates data for training or testing, becoming a foundation model that can be applied to 'End-to-End Foundation Model Pre-training' to understand physical laws of the world. By compressing the laws of the physical world into the model, World Model acquires common sense of the physical world.
Momenta's launched R7 World Model claims to achieve a 10 to 100-fold generational leap in the overall system performance and upper limits.
World Models can empower four major business forms of passenger cars, Robotaxi, Robovan, and Robotruck with the same underlying system architecture, and are expected to extend to fields such as Embodied AI.
Momenta's vision for Physical AI is All-in-One Platform, achieving technology cross-scenario implementation, becoming an AI platform company.
This minimalist architecture will thoroughly end the past pattern of isolated development in various scenarios. The cross-scenario reuse of core underlying technologies greatly amortizes R&D costs for parallel multiple business lines and improves the overall iteration efficiency of the system.
Momenta describes it as: 'One Model, Multi-dimensional Coexistence', which can greatly dilute R&D costs, and expand with business boundary expansion, exponentially amplifying first-mover advantages, forming an 'Winner Takes All' industry endgame.
Its gross margin will even exceed 70%.
Cao Xudong believes: 'Any artificial intelligence application, once approaching human levels, will far exceed human levels in a very short period of time.'
This means that it may take ten or twenty years to climb ahead, but surpassing humans may happen within one or two years. Currently, almost all intelligent driving companies have announced transformation towards Physical AI, and its urgency lies in this.
Currently, whether adhering to the World Model route or the similarly hot VLA model intelligent driving companies have basically打通ed L2 to L4.
Momenta adheres to the years-long 'One Flywheel, Two Legs' strategy. Based on unified algorithms and sensor architectures, it has achieved the connection between L2++ data flow and L4 technology flow. Its technology can be reused in passenger cars and Robotaxi.
However, today, this increasingly approaching 'Android' intelligent driving platform's biggest market is still in the passenger vehicle market.
In the CIC Consulting data cited by Momenta itself:
By 2030, the global Robo market scale (Robotaxi, Robovan, Robotruck) will reach 199.8 billion USD, among which Robotaxi global and China market scale will grow to about 81.8 billion USD and 38.1 billion USD respectively. China Robotaxi penetration rate is expected to reach 11.9%, higher than the global 5.7%. Robovan global and China market scale will reach about 85 billion USD and 53.5 billion USD respectively, market penetration rate will reach 6.9% and 14.0%. Robotruck global and China market scale will reach about 33 billion USD and 16.5 billion USD respectively, market penetration rate will reach 0.6% and 1.2%.
But the mass production assisted driving market scale by 2030, global market scale will reach 305.9 billion USD, still far exceeding the Robo market:
In 2025, global and China L2-level - Highway NOA / L2-level - City NOA assisted driving and higher-level intelligent driving market scale reached about 20.4 billion USD and 13 billion USD respectively. It is expected to expand to 305.9 billion USD and 166.6 billion USD by 2030, with compound annual growth rates of 71.9% and 66.5% respectively.
And the Robotaxi market faces huge uncertainty due to city access policies, different regulatory regulations in various places, and operating costs.
Momenta's IPO fundraising this time will invest about 20% in Robotaxi commercialization and scaling. On one hand, L4 has huge imagination space, but it is also the most uncertain part. When Robotaxi will truly contribute clear revenue still has no clear schedule.
Meanwhile, in the passenger vehicle market, although Momenta has obvious advantages, it has not killed the game.
In the traditional so-called Horizon, Huawei Qiankun Intelligent Driving, Zhuoyu, there are still WeRide, Pony.ai. Also preparing for IPO are Qingzhou Smart Driving, DeepRoute.ai.
Skyway Technology, Baidu Apollo, etc. have also established certain advantages in the L4 market.
04.
Intelligent Driving Market Has Not Formed Winner Takes All
An intelligent driving platform similar to Android will eventually appear, but ultimately who wins remains, and no company has established an absolute advantage.
This makes the sustainability of Momenta's high gross margins also uncertain.
First, the continuous decline of single car software licensing unit price has become an industry trend. With more players entering the track and acceleration of penetration in low-end models, city NOA software licensing fees have dropped from several thousand yuan in the early days to the level of thousands, with some lightweight solutions having even lower unit prices.
To seize the mid-to-low-end model market, Momenta actively sinks pricing. While expanding on a large scale, it will inevitably face the pressure of shrinkage in single model profit.
Second, customer concentration is extremely high, bargaining power is fragile. In the past three years, the top five customers contributed 62.6% to 86.7% of revenue. In 2025, the revenue share of the largest customer (presumably BYD) reached 21.6%. If a core customer has sales lower than expected or turns to self-research/competitors, licensing fee revenue will suddenly stop. BYD as Momenta's largest customer, annual installation is about 300,000 vehicles. Its strategic choice will directly affect Momenta's revenue stability.
Third, the rebellion of self-research by car manufacturers is accelerating. Practices by top car manufacturers such as Geely, BYD, and NIO show that only by breaking external binding with independent technology can pricing rights be reclaimed.
Geely insists on self-research of Three Electric Systems, Intelligent Driving, Cockpit. Zeekr 9X is equipped with self-developed Qianli Haohan G-ASD Intelligent Driving System, gross margin stabilized above 20%. NIO announced full fleet replacement with self-developed Shenji NX9031 chip, single car cost directly reduced by 10,000 yuan.
It can be said that for Momenta, 71.6% gross margin is both a moat and a gunpowder keg.
Cao Xudong predicts 'Long-term third-party supply will be the market mainstream', but ultimately forming a 2-3 'Winner Takes All' industry endgame is obviously not what OEMs hope to see.
Momenta has the opportunity to be the one among Chinese intelligent driving companies that is first regarded by the market as a platform-type AI enterprise. But if it fails to achieve monopoly advantage in time, it may also be quickly pulled back to the traditional autonomous driving valuation framework of 'High R&D, Heavy Investment, Unprofitable'.
From this angle, Momenta's listing is not only a critical moment for itself, but also a public defense for the entire autonomous driving and Physical AI industry.
Written at the end
After Embodied AI, Physical AI concepts enter public discourse, autonomous driving seems to have lost its charm. An intuitive manifestation is the influx of a large number of autonomous driving talents into Embodied AI startups. Musk dismantling Model S/X production lines to produce robots is a crude and jaw-dropping move.
So, can putting a Physical AI crown on autonomous driving attract the capital frenzy triggered by Digital AI?
Anthropic, founded only five years ago, realized a 965 billion USD stunning valuation of course did not repeat on Momenta.
What can be explained is that the Physical AI concept has a certain deception. It is not completely isolated and relative to Digital AI. For OpenAI, Gemini these digital large models, they can also enter any business track focused by Physical AI.
On May 16 this year, Zhuoyu Technology CEO Shen Shaojie issued a warning to his peers:
'I am very worried about those doing large models entering intelligent driving, which would be a dimensional strike against us. What I am really afraid of is that digital AI large model companies reverse and wipe us out.'
'Except for Tesla, no intelligent driving company has truly implemented Scaling Law (model quality changes as computing power / data / parameters expand); but OpenAI, ByteDance have already run through Scaling Law.'
And large model companies represented by OpenAI follow 'Multimodal + World Model + Autoregressive Reasoning', which naturally suits 'Visual Prediction + Physical Reasoning + Long-horizon Decision Making', which is exactly the technical core of intelligent driving systems.
Large Modelsdon't need to learn to drive from scratch, just fine-tuning, to quickly reach even exceed L2+/L4 capabilities.
In other words, although the company positioning most similar to Momenta is Huawei Infront and Horizon, the long-term competitors for these intelligent driving companies are neither each other nor OEM self-research, but may come from barbarians outside.
Dalam pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli akan membandingkan Perodua Aruz dan Mazda CX-5 apabila memilih kereta.
Perodua Aruz dijual di Malaysia dengan harga OTR RM 72,900 - 77,900, terdapat keseluruhan 2 varian, termasuk 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900) dan lain-lain.
Mazda CX-5 dijual di Malaysia dengan harga OTR RM 135,469 - 166,760, terdapat keseluruhan 3 varian, termasuk 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary (RM 316,154), 2025 2.0L AT (RM 296,154), 2025 2.0L MT (RM 294,154) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, Perodua Aruz benar-benar lebih murah RM 62,569 berbanding Mazda CX-5 pada harga permulaan. Jika bajet anda terhad, verian permulaan Perodua sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Namun perlu diingat, beberapa ribu yang lebih murah itu mungkin ada kompromi pada kelengkapan, bergantung sepenuhnya pada keperluan anda.
Perodua Aruz dilengkapi dengan 1.5L 4-cyl, kuasa kuda 105 hp. Konsumsi rasmi 6.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-5 dilengkapi dengan 1.5L Turbo, kuasa kuda 140 hp. Konsumsi rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Dari segi kuasa, Turbo 1.5L Mazda CX-5 mempunyai 35 kuasa kuda lebih berbanding 1.5L 4-cyl Perodua Aruz. Walau bagaimanapun, untuk penggunaan harian di bandar, kuasa kedua-dua kereta sudah mencukupi, tiada rasa kurang kuasa.
Penarafan keselamatan Perodua Aruz ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk.
Penarafan keselamatan Mazda CX-5 ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk.
Penarafan keselamatan kedua-dua kereta sama, pada tahap ini kelengkapan keselamatan dianggap cukup lengkap. Keselamatan kereta baru sekarang tidak buruk, tidak perlu bimbang tentang hal ini.
Perodua Aruz menggunakan cara pemanduan FWD.
Mazda CX-5 menggunakan cara pemanduan FWD.
Cara pemanduan kedua-dua kereta sama, kedua-duanya FWD, pengalaman memandu harian tidak akan berbeza jauh.
Perodua Aruz dan Mazda CX-5 adalah pilihan utama pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga, perjalanan harian. Jika anda lebih mengutamakan reputasi jenama dan harga jualan semula, boleh pertimbangkan yang mempunyai reputasi lebih baik terlebih dahulu; jika anda lebih mementingkan nisbah harga dan kelengkapan, pilih yang mempunyai konfigurasi lebih kaya. Pada akhirnya disarankan kedua-dua model untuk dicuba uji, pengalaman peribadi adalah yang paling penting.
Secara keseluruhan, Perodua Aruz dan Mazda CX-5 adalah model yang sangat bagus di pasaran Malaysia. Pilih yang mana, kuncinya adalah bergantung pada keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Disarankan kepada anda membuat penyelidikan, bandingkan beberapa sebut harga dari pengedar kereta, kemudian buat ujian memandu untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa untuk penyelidikan tidak akan salah.
Dalam pasaran SUV Malaysia, ramai pembeli semasa memilih kereta akan membandingkan Perodua Aruz dan Mazda CX-30. Kedua-dua kereta ini mempunyai harga dan kedudukan pasaran yang hampir sama. Hari ini, kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Perodua Aruz dijual dengan harga OTR di Malaysia sebanyak RM 72,900 - 77,900, terdapat 2 varian, termasuk 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), dan lain-lain.
Mazda CX-30 dijual dengan harga OTR di Malaysia sebanyak RM 122,409 - 146,409, terdapat 4 varian, termasuk 2025 2.0L High+ Premium (RM 146,409), 2025 2.0L High+ (RM 138,409), 2025 2.0L High (RM 130,409), dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, permulaan harga Perodua Aruz memang lebih murah RM 49,509 berbanding Mazda CX-30. Jika bajet anda terhad, varian asas Perodua sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Tetapi perlu diingat, perbezaan harga ribuan ringgit tersebut mungkin melibatkan kompromi pada kelengkapan, bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Penilaian keselamatan Perodua Aruz ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk.
Penilaian keselamatan Mazda CX-30 ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk i-Activsense.
Kedua-dua kereta mempunyai penilaian keselamatan yang sama, kelengkapan keselamatan pada tahap ini dianggap lengkap. Keselamatan kereta baharu semasa adalah baik, tiada perlu terlalu bimbang mengenai hal ini.
Panjang badan Perodua Aruz 4400 mm, ruang bagasi 400 L.
Panjang badan Mazda CX-30 4500 mm, ruang bagasi 450 L.
Dari segi ruang, badan Mazda CX-30 lebih panjang 100 mm berbanding Perodua Aruz, ruang duduk lebih unggul. Namun, Perodua Aruz lebih fleksibel untuk parkir di bandar, masing-masing ada komprominya.
Perodua Aruz waranti 5 tahun/150,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Mazda CX-30 waranti 5 tahun/150,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Syarat waranti kedua-dua kereta sama, tidak perlu bimbang mengenai hal ini. Kos penyelenggaraan sebenar bergantung pada rangkaian perkhidmatan jenama dan harga komponen, disyorkan bertanya kepada pemilik sebenar dalam kumpulan kereta.
Perodua Aruz dan Mazda CX-30 kedua-duanya pilihan utama di pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga dan perjalanan harian. Jika anda lebih mengutamakan reputasi jenama dan harga jualan semula, pertimbangkan yang mempunyai reputasi lebih baik. Jika anda lebih mementingkan nilai harga dan kelengkapan, pilih yang mempunyai konfigurasi lebih banyak. Akhir sekali, disyorkan untuk memandu ujian kedua-duanya, pengalaman sendiri adalah yang paling penting.
Secara keseluruhan, Perodua Aruz dan Mazda CX-30 kedua-duanya model kereta yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana satu, kuncinya bergantung pada keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Kami cadangkan anda melakukan riset terlebih dahulu, bandingkan sebut harga dari beberapa kedai kereta, kemudian buat ujian pemanduan untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah urusan besar, meluangkan masa membuat riset tidak akan salah.
Di pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli ketika memilih kereta akan membandingkan Perodua Aruz dengan Mazda CX-30. Kedua-dua kereta ini hampir sama dari segi harga dan posisinya, hari ini kita akan buat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Perodua Aruz di Malaysia dijual dengan harga OTR RM 72,900 - 77,900, secara keseluruhan ada 2 varian, termasuk 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900) dan lain-lain.
Mazda CX-30 di Malaysia dijual dengan harga OTR RM 122,409 - 146,409, secara keseluruhan ada 4 varian, termasuk 2025 2.0L High+ Premium (RM 146,409), 2025 2.0L High+ (RM 138,409), 2025 2.0L High (RM 130,409) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Perodua Aruz memang lebih murah RM 49,509 berbanding Mazda CX-30. Jika anda bajet terhad, varian asas Perodua sudah mencukupi untuk memenuhi keperluan harian. Tetapi perlu diingat, beribu-ribu ringgit yang lebih murah itu mungkin ada kompromi pada kelengkapan, bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Perodua Aruz dilengkapi enjin 1.5L 4-silinder, kuasa 105 hp. Konsumsi bahan api rasmi 6.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-30 dilengkapi enjin 1.5L Turbo, kuasa 140 hp. Konsumsi bahan api rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Dari segi kuasa, 1.5L Turbo Mazda CX-30 mempunyai 35 hp lebih banyak berbanding 1.5L 4-silinder Perodua Aruz. Namun untuk penggunaan harian di bandar, kuasa kedua-dua kereta sudah mencukupi, tidak akan rasa kurang tenaga.
Perodua Aruz panjang kenderaan 4400 mm, kapasiti bagasi 400 L.
Mazda CX-30 panjang kenderaan 4500 mm, kapasiti bagasi 450 L.
Dari segi ruang, panjang Mazda CX-30 lebih 100 mm berbanding Perodua Aruz, ruang duduk lebih baik. Namun Perodua Aruz lebih fleksibel untuk memarkir di bandar, masing-masing ada kompromi.
Perodua Aruz menggunakan cara penggerak roda depan (FWD).
Mazda CX-30 menggunakan cara penggerak roda depan (FWD).
Kedua-dua kereta menggunakan cara penggerak yang sama, iaitu FWD, pengalaman memandu harian tidak akan berbeza jauh.
Secara keseluruhan, Perodua Aruz dan Mazda CX-30 kedua-duanya adalah model kereta yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana, kuncinya bergantung pada keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Kami sarankan anda melakukan kajian, bandingkan lebih banyak sebut harga dari dealer kereta, baru buat ujian memandu untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara penting, meluangkan masa membuat kajian tidak akan salah.
Di pasaran SUV Malaysia, ramai pembeli semasa memilih kereta akan membandingkan Perodua Aruz dan Honda WR-V. Kedua-dua kereta ini mempunyai harga dan kedudukan yang agak hampir, hari ini kita akan melakukan perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Perodua Aruz dijual di Malaysia dengan harga OTR RM 72,900 - 77,900, terdapat 2 versi, termasuk 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900) dan lain-lain.
Honda WR-V dijual di Malaysia dengan harga OTR RM 89,900 - 107,900, terdapat 4 versi, termasuk 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Perodua Aruz memang lebih murah RM 17,000 berbanding Honda WR-V. Jika bajet anda terhad, versi permulaan Perodua sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Tetapi perlu berhati-hati, beberapa ribu ringgit yang murah itu mungkin memerlukan pengorbanan dari segi kelengkapan, bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Perodua Aruz dilengkapi enjin 1.5L 4-silinder, kuasa 105 hp. Penggunaan minyak rasmi 6.0 L/100km.
Honda WR-V dilengkapi enjin 1.5L 4-silinder, kuasa 105 hp. Penggunaan minyak rasmi 6.0 L/100km.
Kedua-dua kereta menggunakan sistem kuasa yang sama, rasa memandu untuk keseharian pada asasnya tiada perbezaan. Dari segi penggunaan minyak juga hampir sama, tidak perlu terlalu bimbang tentang perkara ini.
Perodua Aruz panjang badan 4400 mm, ruang bagasi 400 L.
Honda WR-V panjang badan 4400 mm, ruang bagasi 400 L.
Saiz kedua-dua kereta hampir sama, ruang dalam kenderaan tidak banyak berbeza. Untuk kereta dalam kelas ini, cukup untuk penggunaan harian.
Perodua Aruz menggunakan sistem pemacu FWD.
Honda WR-V menggunakan sistem pemacu FWD.
Sistem pemacu kedua-dua kereta sama, semuanya FWD, rasa memandu untuk keseharian tidak akan berbeza banyak.
Perodua Aruz waranti 5 tahun/150,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Honda WR-V waranti 5 tahun/kilometer tidak terhad, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Secara keseluruhannya, Perodua Aruz dan Honda WR-V adalah model kereta yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana satu, kunci utamanya masih bergantung pada keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Kami menasihatkan anda buat kajian yang baik, membandingkan sebut harga di beberapa dealer kereta, kemudian buat ujian pemandu untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa membuat kajian tidak akan salah.
Dalam pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli semasa memilih kereta akan membandingkan Perodua Aruz dan Proton X50. Kedua-dua kereta ini mempunyai harga dan kedudukan pasaran yang sangat hampir, hari ini kami akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat persediaan.
Harga OTR Perodua Aruz di Malaysia adalah RM 72,900 - 77,900, terdapat keseluruhan 2 varian, termasuk 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Proton X50 di Malaysia adalah RM 89,800 - 113,300, terdapat keseluruhan 4 varian, termasuk 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Perodua Aruz memang lebih murah RM 16,900 berbanding Proton X50. Jika bajet anda terhad, varian permulaan Perodua sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Namun perlu diingat, jumlah perbezaan harga tersebut mungkin melibatkan kompromi dari segi kelengkapan, bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Perodua Aruz menggunakan enjin 1.5L 4-silinder, kuasa kuda 105 hp. Penggunaan minyak rasmi 6.0 L/100km.
Proton X50 menggunakan enjin 1.5L 4-silinder, kuasa kuda 105 hp. Penggunaan minyak rasmi 6.0 L/100km.
Kedua-dua kereta menggunakan sistem kuasa yang sama, rasa semasa memandu harian pada dasarnya tiada perbezaan. Dari segi penggunaan minyak juga sama, tidak perlu terlalu memikirkan hal ini.
Penilaian keselamatan Perodua Aruz ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk.
Penilaian keselamatan Proton X50 ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Penilaian keselamatan kedua-dua kereta sama, pada tahap ini kelengkapan keselamatan dianggap cukup lengkap. Keselamatan kereta baharu sekarang tidak buruk, tidak perlu terlalu bimbang tentang hal ini.
Perodua Aruz menggunakan sistem pemacu FWD.
Proton X50 menggunakan sistem pemacu 4WD.
Perodua dengan FWD dan Proton dengan 4WD mempunyai rasa berbeza dari segi pengendalian, disarankan untuk memandu uji dan membandingkan.
Secara keseluruhan, Perodua Aruz dan Proton X50 adalah model kereta yang sangat bagus di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana satu, kunci utamanya adalah melihat keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Kami sarankan anda mencari maklumat terlebih dahulu, bandingkan tawaran harga dari pelbagai kedai kereta, kemudian pergi memandu uji untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa untuk mencari maklumat tidak akan salah.
Di pasaran SUV Malaysia, ramai pembeli membandingkan Perodua Ativa dan Chery Tiggo Cross ketika memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kereta ini agak hampir dari segi harga dan kedudukan pasaran, hari ini kita akan buat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk menjimatkan masa anda membuat kajian.
Perodua Ativa dijual pada harga OTR RM 62,500 - 73,400 di Malaysia, dengan 3 varian termasuk 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400) dan lain-lain.
Chery Tiggo Cross dijual pada harga OTR RM 88,750 - 99,750 di Malaysia, dengan 2 varian termasuk 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH (RM 99,750), 2025 1.5T Standard (RM 88,750) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Perodua Ativa memang RM 26,250 lebih murah daripada Chery Tiggo Cross. Jika bajet anda terhad, varian permulaan Perodua sudah memadai untuk keperluan harian. Namun, ambil perhatian, beratus atau beribu ringgit lebih murah mungkin melibatkan kompromi pada kelengkapan, bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Perodua Ativa dilengkapi enjin 1.5L 4 silinder, kuasa 105 hp. Konsumsi bahan api rasmi 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo Cross dilengkapi enjin 1.5L 4 silinder, kuasa 105 hp. Konsumsi bahan api rasmi 6.0 L/100km.
Kedua-dua kereta menggunakan sistem tenaga yang sama, pengalaman memandu sehari-hari hampir tiada perbezaan. Konsumsi bahan api juga hampir sama, tidak perlu terlalu bimbang tentang perkara ini.
Penarafan keselamatan Perodua Ativa ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA.
Penarafan keselamatan Chery Tiggo Cross ialah TBD, sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk Asas.
Dari segi kelengkapan keselamatan, kedua-dua kereta mendapat penarafan yang baik. Namun, ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA pada Perodua Ativa dan Asas pada Chery Tiggo Cross mempunyai perbezaan fungsi. Jika anda lebih mengutamakan keselamatan aktif, anda boleh membandingkan senarai fungsi kedua-duanya dengan teliti.
Perodua Ativa menjamin 5 tahun/150,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Chery Tiggo Cross menjamin 3 tahun/100,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Secara keseluruhannya, Perodua Ativa dan Chery Tiggo Cross adalah model yang sangat bagus di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih mana satu, perkara utamanya bergantung pada keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Kami cadangkan untuk membuat kajian, membandingkan beberapa sebut harga daripada pelbagai dealer, kemudian uji kereta untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa untuk membuat kajian pasti tidak salah.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Ativa and Proton X70 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Perodua Ativa in Malaysia is RM 62,500 - 73,400, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400), etc.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
From the price perspective, Perodua Ativa's starting price is indeed RM 44,300 cheaper than Proton X70. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, that few thousand difference in price might involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Perodua Ativa's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA.
Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive for this class. New cars nowadays generally have good safety, no need to worry too much about this.
Perodua Ativa uses FWD drive configuration.
Proton X70 uses FWD drive configuration.
Both cars have the same drive configuration, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not differ much.
Perodua Ativa warranty is 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X70 warranty is 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, no need to worry about this aspect. Actual maintenance costs also depend on the brand's service network and parts prices, suggest asking real owners in car groups for experience.
Perodua Ativa and Proton X70 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Ativa and Proton X70 are both quite good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big thing, spending some time researching is never wrong.
Dalam pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli membandingkan Perodua Ativa dan Proton X50 ketika memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kereta ini mempunyai harga dan kedudukan pasaran yang agak hampir, hari ini kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek, membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Harga OTR Perodua Ativa di Malaysia adalah RM 62,500 - 73,400, terdapat 3 varian, termasuk 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Proton X50 di Malaysia adalah RM 89,800 - 113,300, terdapat 4 varian, termasuk 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Perodua Ativa memang lebih murah RM 27,300 berbanding Proton X50. Jika bajet anda terhad, versi permulaan Perodua sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Tetapi perlu diingat, ribuan ringgit yang lebih murah itu mungkin ada kompromi pada kelengkapan, bergantung kepada keperluan anda.
Perodua Ativa dilengkapi enjin 1.5L 4-silinder, kuasa 105 hp. Kecekapan bahan api rasmi 6.0 L/100km.
Proton X50 dilengkapi enjin 1.5L 4-silinder, kuasa 105 hp. Kecekapan bahan api rasmi 6.0 L/100km.
Kedua-dua kereta menggunakan sistem pemacu yang sama, rasa memandu sehari-hari pada dasarnya tiada bezanya. Dari segi kecekapan bahan api juga hampir sama, tidak perlu terlalu berfikir tentang perkara ini.
Perodua Ativa panjang badan 4400 mm, bagasi 400 L.
Proton X50 panjang badan 4400 mm, bagasi 400 L.
Saiz kedua-dua kereta hampir sama, ruang dalaman tidak banyak berbeza. Kereta kelas ini, untuk kegunaan harian sudah sangat mencukupi.
Perodua Ativa menggunakan sistem pemacu FWD.
Proton X50 menggunakan sistem pemacu 4WD.
Perodua dengan FWD dan Proton dengan 4WD akan memberikan rasa pengendalian yang berbeza, disyorkan untuk ujian jalan berbanding.
Perodua Ativa jaminan 5 tahun/150,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Proton X50 jaminan 5 tahun/150,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Syarat jaminan kedua-dua kereta sama, tidak perlu berfikir tentang ini. Kos penyelenggaraan sebenar juga bergantung pada rangkaian perkhidmatan jenama dan harga komponen, disyorkan bertanya pemandu sebenar dalam kumpulan kereta.
Secara keseluruhan, Perodua Ativa dan Proton X50 adalah model kereta yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana satu, yang penting adalah keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Kami cadangkan anda membuat kajian dengan baik, bandingkan beberapa sebut harga dari pengedar, kemudian buat ujian jalan untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, mengambil masa untuk membuat kajian tidak akan salah.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-30 做比較。这两款车喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一次詳細嘅對比，幫您省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
Mazda CX-30 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 122,409 - 146,409，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L High+ Premium（RM 146,409）、2025 2.0L High+（RM 138,409）、2025 2.0L High（RM 130,409） 等。
從價錢來看，Proton X90 嘅起步價確實比 Mazda CX-30 便宜咗 RM 15,609。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但亦要留意，便宜嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Proton X90 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Mazda CX-30 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩款車用嘅係同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感受基本冇分別。油耗方面都係差不多，唔使太糾結這一點。
Proton X90 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Mazda CX-30 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別里面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心這一點。
Proton X90 車身長 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
Mazda CX-30 車身長 4500 mm，后备箱 450 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-30 嘅車身比 Proton X90 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Proton X90 喺城市入面停車會靈活啲，各有取舍。
Proton X90 保修 5年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-30 保修 5年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要看品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問問真實車主嘅經驗。
總嘅來說，Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-30 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲是要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會用 Toyota Harrier 同 Audi Q7 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾相近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你慳返做功課嘅時間。
Toyota Harrier 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 289,000 - 289,000，合共有 1 個版本，包括 2026 HEV 2.5L Standard（RM 289,000） 等。
Audi Q7 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 462,222 - 462,222，合共有 1 個版本，包括 Standard（RM 462,222） 等。
由價錢嚟睇，Toyota Harrier 嘅起步價真係比 Audi Q7 平咗 RM 173,222。如果你預算有限，Toyota 嘅入門版已經足夠滿足日常需要。不過都係要留意，嗰幾千蚊，喺配備上會有所取捨，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Toyota Harrier 配備 2.0L Turbo，馬力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
Audi Q7 配備 3.0L Turbo，馬力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Audi Q7 嘅 3.0L Turbo 比 Toyota Harrier 嘅 2.0L Turbo 多咗 130 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Toyota Harrier 保養 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Audi Q7 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Toyota Harrier 同 Audi Q7 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更加重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更加重視性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。始終建議兩款都去試駕，親身感受先係最重要。
總體嚟講，Toyota Harrier 同 Audi Q7 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
在馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿馬自達 CX-8 同奇瑞 Tiggo 9 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細對比，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
馬自達 CX-8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 165,360 - 201,360，合共 5 個版本，包括 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol（RM 201,360）、2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel（RM 193,123）、2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol（RM 186,360） 等。
奇瑞 Tiggo 9 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 166,800 - 179,800，合共 1 個版本，包括 2026 2.0T Standard（RM 179,750） 等。
由價錢睇，馬自達 CX-8 嘅入門價確實比奇瑞 Tiggo 9 平咗 RM 1,440。如果你預算有限，馬自達嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需要。
馬自達 CX-8 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
奇瑞 Tiggo 9 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩部車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
馬自達 CX-8 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
奇瑞 Tiggo 9 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
馬自達 CX-8 同奇瑞 Tiggo 9 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更重視性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩部都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總括嚟講，馬自達 CX-8 同奇瑞 Tiggo 9 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Hyundai Tucson 同 Subaru Forester 做比較。兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個角度做一個詳細嘅對比，幫大家慳返做功課嘅時間。
Hyundai Tucson 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 143,888 - 197,888，合共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige（RM 197,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige（RM 186,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime（RM 164,888）等。
Subaru Forester 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 174,000 - 197,000，合共有 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition（RM 189,538）、2024 2.0L S EyeSight（RM 177,538）、2024 2.0L L EyeSight（RM 167,538）等。
睇返價錢，Hyundai Tucson 嘅起步行價確實比 Subaru Forester 平咗 RM 30,112。如果你預算有限，Hyundai 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但亦要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取舍，具體睇返你嘅需要。
Hyundai Tucson 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Subaru Forester 配備 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Subaru Forester 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Hyundai Tucson 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區行，兩部車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Hyundai Tucson 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Subaru Forester 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸差唔多，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Hyundai Tucson 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Subaru Forester 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Hyundai Tucson 同 Subaru Forester 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總括嚟講，Hyundai Tucson 同 Subaru Forester 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇返你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係一件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Volvo XC90 同 BMW X5 嚟比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，而家我哋就係從多個方面做一次詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Volvo XC90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 418,888 - 418,888，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2025 2.0T Ultra（RM 418,888）等。
BMW X5 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 470,800 - 470,800，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 86,300）、1.5L Executive（RM 95,300）、1.5L Premium（RM 103,300）等。
由價錢睇落嚟，Volvo XC90 嘅起步價真係比 BMW X5 平咗 RM 51,912。如果你預算有限，Volvo 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都係要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能在配備上會有取捨，具體就要睇你嘅需求。
Volvo XC90 搭載 3.0L Turbo，馬力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
BMW X5 搭載 3.0L Turbo，馬力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
兩部車用嘅係同一套動力系統，日常行車嘅感受基本無差別。油耗方面都差不多，唔使太糾結呢一點。
Volvo XC90 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
BMW X5 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
安全配備方面，兩部車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Volvo XC90 嘅 Premium ADAS 同 BMW X5 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 喺功能上有些分別，如果你比較著重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較吓兩邊嘅功能清單。
Volvo XC90 保用 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
BMW X5 保用 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩部車嘅保用條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問吓真實車主嘅經驗。
總體嚟講，Volvo XC90 同 BMW X5 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 富豪 XC90 同 賓士 GLB 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近嘅，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
富豪 XC90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 418,888 - 418,888，一共 1 個版本，包括 2025 2.0T Ultra（RM 418,888） 等。
賓士 GLB 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 299,888 - 352,888，一共 1 個版本，包括 Standard（RM 299,888） 等。
由價錢嚟睇，賓士 GLB 嘅起步價比 富豪 XC90 平咗 RM 119,000。講實話，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵都係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
富豪 XC90 配備 3.0L Turbo，馬力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
賓士 GLB 配備 2.0L Turbo，馬力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
動力方面，富豪 XC90 嘅 3.0L Turbo 比 賓士 GLB 嘅 2.0L Turbo 多咗 130 匹馬力，中後段加速更有把握，尤其係行高速超車嘅時候。不過 賓士 GLB 嘅油耗可能更抵，日常市區通勤分別唔會太大。
富豪 XC90 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
賓士 GLB 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。
富豪 XC90 保養保修 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
賓士 GLB 保養保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
富豪 XC90 同 賓士 GLB 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以首選口碑更好嗰款；如果你更重視性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩部都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總括嚟講，富豪 XC90 同 賓士 GLB 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊部，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係一件大事，花點時間做功課絕對無錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿寶騰 X70 同奇瑞 Tiggo 9 嚟做比較。今日我哋從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
奇瑞 Tiggo 9 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 166,800 - 179,800，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2026 2.0T Standard（RM 179,750） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，寶騰 X70 嘅起步價確實比奇瑞 Tiggo 9 平咗 RM 60,000。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
寶騰 X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
奇瑞 Tiggo 9 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過寶騰 X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同奇瑞 Tiggo 9 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
寶騰 X70 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
奇瑞 Tiggo 9 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
寶騰 X70 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
奇瑞 Tiggo 9 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，寶騰 X70 同奇瑞 Tiggo 9 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵始終係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會用馬自達 CX-30 同 長城 哈弗 H6 嚟做比較。今日我哋由多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
馬自達 CX-30 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 122,409 - 146,409，合共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L High+ Premium（RM 146,409）、2025 2.0L High+（RM 138,409）、2025 2.0L High（RM 130,409） 等等。
長城 哈弗 H6 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 139,750 - 139,750，合共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Turbo Standard（RM 140,000）、1.5L Turbo Premium（RM 155,000） 等等。
由價錢睇，馬自達 CX-30 嘅起步價確實比 長城 哈弗 H6 平咗 RM 17,341。如果你預算有限，馬自達嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嘅嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
馬自達 CX-30 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
長城 哈弗 H6 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
馬自達 CX-30 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
長城 哈弗 H6 保修 7 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
馬自達 CX-30 同 長城 哈弗 H6 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總括嚟講，馬自達 CX-30 同 長城 哈弗 H6 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
在马来西亚的汽车市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Toyota Hilux 和 Isuzu D-MAX 来做比较。今天我们从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Toyota Hilux 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 104,880 - 173,280，一共有 6 个版本，包括 2025 2.8T AT Double Cab GR Sport（RM 173,280）、2025 2.8T AT Double Cab Rogue（RM 163,080）、2025 2.4T AT Double Cab V（RM 149,580） 等。
Isuzu D-MAX 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 95,000 - 155,000，一共有 9 个版本，包括 2026 3.0T AT 4WD X-Terrain 5 Seats（RM 162,888）、2026 3.0T AT 4WD Premium 5 Seats（RM 145,088）、2026 2.2T AT 4WD Premium 5 Seats（RM 141,771） 等。
从价钱来看，Isuzu D-MAX 的起步价比 Toyota Hilux 便宜了 RM 9,880。老实讲，在这个价位段，几千块的差距其实不算大，关键还是看整体的性价比和长期使用成本。
Toyota Hilux 的安全评级是 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Brand ADAS。
Isuzu D-MAX 的安全评级是 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 ADAS。
两款车的安全评级一样，在这个级别里面安全配备都算给得很齐全了。现在的新车安全性都不差，不用太担心这一点。
Toyota Hilux 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Isuzu D-MAX 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
两款车的驱动方式一样，都是 FWD，日常驾驶感受不会有太大区别。
Toyota Hilux 保修 5年/无限制里程，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
Isuzu D-MAX 保修 3年/100,000km，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
总的来说，Toyota Hilux 和 Isuzu D-MAX 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
© 2024 Bitauto.com. All Rights Reserved.
Bitauto (www.yiche.com and www.bitauto.com) is one of the most visited automotive websites in China. We provide detailed info on Chinese car brands available in your area. Please note that the information provided on this website is based on publicly available data and is for reference only. It may not be fully updated or accurate at all times.
Help us improve our website
