Homesports
Search History
Popular Searches
Dealer Login / Sign Up
Di pasaran SUV Malaysia, banyak pembeli apabila memilih kereta akan membandingkan Proton X90 dan Mazda CX-5. Kedua-dua kereta ini memiliki harga dan kedudukan yang agak hampir, hari ini kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek, membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Harga OTR Proton X90 di Malaysia adalah RM 106,800 - 122,800, terdapat 4 versi, termasuk 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Mazda CX-5 di Malaysia adalah RM 135,469 - 166,760, terdapat 3 versi, termasuk 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary (RM 316,154), 2025 2.0L AT (RM 296,154), 2025 2.0L MT (RM 294,154) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X90 memang lebih murah RM 28,669 daripada Mazda CX-5. Jika bajet anda terhad, versi permulaan Proton sudah cukup memenuhi keperluan harian. Tetapi perlu diingat, perbezaan harga beberapa ribu ini mungkin mempunyai kompromi pada kelengkapan, bergantung kepada keperluan anda.
Taraf keselamatan Proton X90 adalah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Taraf keselamatan Mazda CX-5 adalah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk.
Taraf keselamatan kedua-dua kereta adalah sama, peralatan keselamatan di kelas ini dianggap cukup lengkap. Keselamatan kereta baharu masa ini semuanya baik, tiada perlu terlalu risau mengenai hal ini.
Waranti Proton X90 5 tahun/150,000km, jarak servis setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Waranti Mazda CX-5 5 tahun/150,000km, jarak servis setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Kemudahan waranti kedua-dua kereta adalah sama, tiada perlu bimbang mengenai hal ini. Kos servis sebenar bergantung pada rangkaian servis jenama dan harga komponen, cadangkan bertanya pengalaman pemilik sebenar dalam komuniti pemilik kereta.
Proton X90 dan Mazda CX-5 kedua-duanya adalah pilihan utama di pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga dan perjalanan harian. Jika anda lebih mengutamakan reputasi jenama dan nilai jual semula, pilihlah yang mempunyai reputasi lebih baik; jika anda lebih mengambil kira nilai dan kelengkapan, pilihlah model dengan kelengkapan lebih lengkap. Pada akhirnya, adalah disyorkan untuk menguji memandu kedua-dua model, pengalaman langsung adalah yang paling penting.
Secara keseluruhannya, Proton X90 dan Mazda CX-5 kedua-duanya adalah model yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih mana satu, kuncinya bergantung pada keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Disyorkan kepada pengguna untuk melakukan kajian terlebih dahulu, membandingkan beberapa tawaran dari kedai kereta, kemudian buat ujian memandu untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan sedikit masa untuk kajian tidak akan salah.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家揀車時都會拿 Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-8 來比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，而家我就從多個方面做個詳細比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一總共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
Mazda CX-8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 165,360 - 201,360，一總共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol（RM 201,360）、2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel（RM 193,123）、2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol（RM 186,360） 等。
從價錢睇，Proton X90 嘅起步價確實比 Mazda CX-8 平咗 RM 58,560。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體就要睇你嘅需要。
Proton X90 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Mazda CX-8 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Mazda CX-8 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Proton X90 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X90 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
Mazda CX-8 車身長 4500 mm，後備箱 450 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-8 嘅車身比 Proton X90 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Proton X90 喺城入面停車會靈活啲，各有取捨。
Proton X90 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mazda CX-8 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
總括嚟講，Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-8 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要睇你個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拎 Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-8 嚟做比較。这两款车喺價位同定位上都幾近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你慳做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，合共 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800）等。
Mazda CX-8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 165,360 - 201,360，合共 5 個版本，包括 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol（RM 201,360）、2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel（RM 193,123）、2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol（RM 186,360）等。
由價錢睇，Proton X90 嘅起價的確比 Mazda CX-8 平咗 RM 58,560。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上要有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Proton X90 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Mazda CX-8 配備 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Mazda CX-8 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Proton X90 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都足夠，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X90 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-8 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保養條款一樣，呢方面唔使煩惱。實際保養成本仲要看品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問下真實車主嘅經驗。
Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-8 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先最重要。
總括嚟講，Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-8 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要看你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X90 and Toyota Corolla Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X90's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
Toyota Corolla Cross's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 133,800 - 148,800, with a total of 3 versions, including 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport (RM 148,800), 2026 HEV 1.8L Standard (RM 140,800), 2026 1.8L Standard (RM 133,800), etc.
From the price perspective, the Proton X90's starting price is indeed RM 27,000 cheaper than the Toyota Corolla Cross. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But keep in mind, that savings of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X90 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Toyota Corolla Cross body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, and the difference in interior space is not significant. For this class of cars, it is more than sufficient for daily use.
Proton X90 uses FWD drive mode.
Toyota Corolla Cross uses FWD drive mode.
Both cars share the same drive mode, both are FWD, so there shouldn't be a huge difference in the daily driving experience.
Proton X90 and Toyota Corolla Cross are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with a better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, then choose the model with richer configuration. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X90 and Toyota Corolla Cross are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your homework, comparing quotes from several dealers, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending time on research will definitely not be a mistake.
Dalam pasaran SUV Malaysia, ramai pembeli ketika memilih kereta selalu membandingkan Proton X90 dengan Toyota Fortuner. Kedua-dua kereta ini hampir sama dari segi harga dan kedudukan, hari ini kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek, untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Harga OTR Proton X90 di Malaysia adalah RM 106,800 - 122,800, secara keseluruhannya ada 4 varian, termasuk 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Toyota Fortuner di Malaysia adalah RM 195,880 - 241,880, secara keseluruhannya ada 3 varian, termasuk 2024 2.8T VRZ Diesel (RM 241,880), 2024 2.7L SRZ Petrol (RM 202,880), 2024 2.4L Standard Diesel (RM 195,880) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X90 benar-benar lebih murah RM 89,080 berbanding Toyota Fortuner. Jika bajet anda terbatas, varian asas Proton sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Namun perlu berhati-hati, perbezaan harga beberapa ribu itu, mungkin ada pertukaran dari segi kelengkapan, bergantung sepenuhnya pada keperluan anda.
Penilaian keselamatan Proton X90 adalah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Penilaian keselamatan Toyota Fortuner adalah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk.
Penilaian keselamatan kedua-dua kereta adalah sama, pada tahap ini peralatan keselamatan dianggap lengkap. Keselamatan kereta baharu sekarang tidak buruk, anda tidak perlu risau terlalu banyak tentang hal ini.
Proton X90 panjang kenderaan 4400 mm, ruang muatan 400 L.
Toyota Fortuner panjang kenderaan 4400 mm, ruang muatan 400 L.
Saiz kedua-dua kereta hampir sama, ruang dalaman perbezaannya tidak besar. Kereta pada tahap ini cukup untuk penggunaan harian.
Proton X90 waranti 5 tahun/150,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Toyota Fortuner waranti 5 tahun/jarak tanpa had, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Proton X90 dan Toyota Fortuner sama-sama pilihan utama dalam pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga, perjalanan harian. Jika anda lebih mementingkan reputasi jenama dan harga kenderaan terpakai, boleh memprioritaskan model dengan reputasi yang lebih baik; jika anda lebih mengutamakan nisbah harga dan kelengkapan, maka pilih model dengan konfigurasi lebih lengkap. Pada akhirnya, disarankan untuk ujian memandu kedua-dua model, pengalaman peribadi adalah yang paling penting.
Secara keseluruhan, Proton X90 dan Toyota Fortuner sama-sama model yang agak baik dalam pasaran Malaysia. Memilih mana satu, kunci utamanya bergantung pada keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Disarankan untuk membuat kajian terlebih dahulu, bandingkan beberapa tawaran dari dealer kereta, kemudian buat ujian memandu untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan sedikit masa untuk kajian tidak akan salah.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X90 同 Toyota Fortuner 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
Toyota Fortuner 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 195,880 - 241,880，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.8T VRZ Diesel（RM 241,880）、2024 2.7L SRZ Petrol（RM 202,880）、2024 2.4L Standard Diesel（RM 195,880） 等。
從價錢睇落，Proton X90 嘅起步價確實比 Toyota Fortuner 平咗 RM 89,080。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都係要注意，平嗰啲幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X90 嘅安全評分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Toyota Fortuner 嘅安全評分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
兩款車嘅安全評分一樣，喺呢個級別裡面安全配備都算俾得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔錯，唔使太擔心這一點。
Proton X90 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Toyota Fortuner 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大區別。
Proton X90 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Toyota Fortuner 保養 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X90 同 Toyota Fortuner 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總體嚟講，Proton X90 同 Toyota Fortuner 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較間幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X90 and Honda CR-V when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X90 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
The OTR price of Honda CR-V in Malaysia is RM 178,200 - 195,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Proton X90 is indeed RM 71,400 cheaper than Honda CR-V. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand ringgit cheaper, there might be trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X90 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Honda CR-V safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite complete within this class. New car safety is generally good now, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X90 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Honda CR-V body length is 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, Honda CR-V's body is 100 mm longer than Proton X90, offering more passenger space advantage. However, Proton X90 is more flexible for parking in the city, both have trade-offs.
Proton X90 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda CR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Proton X90 and Honda CR-V are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose, mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers tend to compare Proton X90 and Honda WR-V when choosing a car. Both vehicles are quite close in terms of price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X90's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
Honda WR-V's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Honda WR-V is RM 16,900 cheaper than Proton X90. To be honest, in this price range, the difference of a few thousand is not actually significant; the key lies in overall value for money and long-term running costs.
Proton X90's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Honda WR-V's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive within this class. New cars nowadays are generally safe, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X90 adopts FWD drive configuration.
Honda WR-V adopts FWD drive configuration.
Both cars have the same drive configuration, both are FWD, so there will not be much difference in daily driving experience.
Proton X90 and Honda WR-V are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both models, personal experience is the most important.
In general, Proton X90 and Honda WR-V are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will never go wrong.
Dalam pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli semasa memilih kereta akan membandingkan Proton X90 dan Honda CR-V. Kedua-dua kereta ini pada harga dan pelokasian agak hampir, hari ini kita akan melakukan perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek, membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Harga OTR Proton X90 di Malaysia adalah RM 106,800 - 122,800, mempunyai 4 versi, termasuk 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Honda CR-V di Malaysia adalah RM 178,200 - 195,900, mempunyai 4 versi, termasuk 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200) dan lain-lain.
Jika dilihat dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X90 memang lebih murah RM 71,400 berbanding Honda CR-V. Jika bajet anda terhad, versi asas Proton sudah dapat memenuhi keperluan harian. Tetapi jangan lupa, perbezaan harga itu mungkin melibatkan pengurangan pada kelengkapan, ia bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Rating keselamatan Proton X90 adalah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Rating keselamatan Honda CR-V adalah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Rating keselamatan kedua-dua kereta adalah sama, dalam kelas ini kelengkapan keselamatan dianggap sangat lengkap. Keselamatan kereta baru sekarang tidak kurang baik, jangan terlalu risau hal ini.
Proton X90 menggunakan cara pemacu FWD.
Honda CR-V menggunakan cara pemacu FWD.
Cara pemacu kedua-dua kereta adalah sama, semuanya FWD, pengalaman memandu harian tidak akan ada perbezaan besar.
Proton X90 jamin 5 tahun/150,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Honda CR-V jamin 5 tahun/jarak tidak terhad, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Secara keseluruhan, Proton X90 dan Honda CR-V adalah model kereta yang sangat bagus di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana, utamanya bergantung pada keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Kami cadangkan anda buat kajian, bandingkan tawaran harga beberapa pengedar, kemudian buat uji jalan untuk keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara penting, meluangkan masa membuat kajian pasti tidak akan salah.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X90 同 Honda CR-V 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一个詳細嘅比較，幫手節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一共 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
Honda CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 178,200 - 195,900，一共 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS（RM 195,900）、2026 1.5T 4WD V（RM 181,900）、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E（RM 178,200） 等。
由價錢睇落，Proton X90 嘅起價的確比 Honda CR-V 平咗 RM 71,400。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以满足日常需求。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X90 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
Honda CR-V 車身長 4500 mm，行李廂 450 L。
空間方面，Honda CR-V 嘅車身比 Proton X90 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Proton X90 喺城市入面泊車會靈活啲，各有取捨。
Proton X90 採用 FWD 驅動形式。
Honda CR-V 採用 FWD 驅動形式。
兩款車嘅驅動形式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會大有分別。
Proton X90 同 Honda CR-V 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更加看重品牌聲譽同二手價，可以優先考慮聲譽更好嗰款；如果你更加在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後都係建議兩部都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總嚟講，Proton X90 同 Honda CR-V 都係馬來西亞市場幾好嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家在選車嘅時候都會拿 寶騰 X90 同 本田 HR-V 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
本田 HR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 115,900 - 143,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS（RM 143,900）、2026 1.5T V（RM 137,900）、2026 1.5T E（RM 130,900） 等。
由價錢睇，寶騰 X90 嘅入門價確實比 本田 HR-V 平咗 RM 9,100。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上要有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需要。
寶騰 X90 裝載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。廠方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
本田 HR-V 裝載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。廠方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩款車用同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感覺基本冇分別。油耗方面都相約，唔使太糾結這一點。
寶騰 X90 保修 5年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6個月。
本田 HR-V 保修 5年/里程無限，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6個月。
寶騰 X90 同 本田 HR-V 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親自體驗先係最緊要。
總括嚟講，寶騰 X90 同 本田 HR-V 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵始終要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
In the Malaysia SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Subaru Forester when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of Subaru Forester in Malaysia is RM 174,000 - 197,000, with a total of 3 versions, including 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition (RM 189,538), 2024 2.0L S EyeSight (RM 177,538), 2024 2.0L L EyeSight (RM 167,538), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 67,200 cheaper than Subaru Forester. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But do note that the few thousand cheaper, there might be trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Subaru Forester is equipped with 2.0L 4-cyl, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Subaru Forester's 2.0L 4-cyl has 30 more horsepower than Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel lacking in power.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Subaru Forester body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. For cars in this class, daily use is completely sufficient.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive system.
Subaru Forester adopts FWD drive system.
The drive system is the same for both cars, both are FWD, there won't be much difference in daily driving feel.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Subaru Forester warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Proton X70 and Subaru Forester are both quite good models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing thorough research, compare quotes from several dealers, then go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Subaru Forester when choosing a car. These two vehicles are quite close in terms of price and positioning. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of the Subaru Forester in Malaysia is RM 174,000 - 197,000, with a total of 3 versions, including 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition (RM 189,538), 2024 2.0L S EyeSight (RM 177,538), 2024 2.0L L EyeSight (RM 167,538), etc.
From a pricing perspective, the starting price of the Proton X70 is indeed RM 67,200 cheaper than the Subaru Forester. If your budget is limited, the Proton entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the few thousand difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, boot 400 L.
Subaru Forester body length 4400 mm, boot 400 L.
The dimensions of the two vehicles are almost identical, with little difference in interior space. Cars in this class are more than sufficient for daily use.
Proton X70 uses FWD drive method.
Subaru Forester uses FWD drive method.
The drive methods of the two vehicles are the same, both FWD, so there should not be much difference in daily driving experience.
Both the Proton X70 and Subaru Forester are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both models, as hands-on experience is the most important.
Overall, both the Proton X70 and Subaru Forester are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time researching will definitely not be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Kia Sportage when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X70 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Kia Sportage OTR price in Malaysia is RM 129,639 - 179,320, with a total of 4 versions, including 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High (RM 179,320), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High (RM 159,320), 2025 2.0L AT 2WD High (RM 139,639), etc.
From the price perspective, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 22,839 cheaper than Kia Sportage. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the cheaper few thousand might have trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Proton X70 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Kia Sportage safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes Drive Wise.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive within this segment. New cars nowadays don't have poor safety, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Kia Sportage body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. Cars of this level are fully sufficient for daily use.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Kia Sportage warranty 5 years/300,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X70 and Kia Sportage are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is suggested to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X70 and Kia Sportage are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, spending some time doing research will never be wrong.
GM's world still exists, but there aren't enough new cars.
Author｜Liu Xinyi Editor｜Mao Shiyang
Auto Pixel (ID:autopix)Original
SAIC-GM's farewell and rebirth arrived in almost the same month.
On August 5, SAIC and GM extended SAIC-GM's joint venture term by 20 years, until 2047.
Four words stood on site: Together to a New Realm. Along with the renewal, the new task for this joint venture was also confirmed.
Three weeks later, on August 28, the Buick Envision 2026 model will be discontinued in the US.
The two events are independent but coincided in the same month.
The Envision story goes back eleven years. At the end of 2015, the first batch of Envisions destined for North America departed from Yantai Port, entering Buick dealerships in the US, Canada, and Mexico the following year. Over the next ten years, cumulative exports reached 420,000 units. After 2017, it became GM's only model imported from China to the US.
Starting in 2018, the Envision bore a 25% tariff, and GM's application for exemption was unsuccessful. On January 22, 2026, GM announced stopping production of Envisions for the US market in China; the next generation will move to the Fairfax, Kansas factory in 2028.
By May this year, the inventory cycle for this model in the US had exceeded 300 days.
▍Old photo of Buick Envision at Yantai Port
One door is closing, while another is opening. According to the arrangement after the renewal, the Buick Zhijing series independently developed by SAIC-GM will be exported overseas starting from October this year, with target markets including the Middle East, Africa, South America, Mexico, and Asia-Pacific.
Tariffs shut out the US car market, and GM hands the world outside to Shanghai.
01
Outside the US, GM is Short of Cars
This renewal did not change the 50:50 equity ratio, nor disclose new investment amounts. What changed is the division of labor.
At the signing ceremony, GM Global Senior Vice President and China President Luo Xu said, SAIC-GM has established local capabilities in engineering, manufacturing, and quality, "We can bring these advantages to the international markets of the Middle East, Africa, South America, Mexico, and the Asia-Pacific region", relying on GM's existing sales and service layouts in these regions.
In organizational language, what he revealed is that SAIC-GM and Pan Asia define the products, while GM provides global channels outside the US market.
The specific implementation method is quite light. SAIC-GM will not build its own sales network overseas, but will fully reuse GM's existing system.
The first exported car is the Buick Zhijing E7, with the first stop in South Korea. GM Korea is responsible for pricing, marketing, and after-sales, while SAIC-GM is only responsible for production, supply, and technical support. Later in other markets, a similar model is expected to be used.
The flow of products and resources has changed. In the past, GM brought global products to China; next, SAIC-GM will send products developed in China back to the world.
This is not common in "Joint Venture 2.0". When most foreign parties allow Chinese joint ventures to go global, they first demarcate their core markets. GM did not give SAIC-GM just an edge market to test the waters; it opened the Middle East, Africa, South America, Mexico, and Asia-Pacific all at once, almost including everything GM owns outside the US. And it allows Chinese products to directly connect to its sales and service system built over many years.
Why now, why these markets, the answers are written on GM's two reports respectively.
▍Group photo when GM Brazil was founded in 1925
The first is North America. In Q2 2026, GM North America's adjusted EBIT margin reached 8.6%, full-size pickup share 43%, No. 1 for the seventh consecutive year. The company raised its performance guidance for the second time this year, raising the adjusted EBIT expectation to $14-16 billion.
This is a self-sustaining machine, expensive, large, high-spec, with brand premium, plus the cash flow of subscription services. It does not need external funding and less external products.
The second report is outside the US.
In 2025, the US market contributed nearly 70% of GM's global sales. Following the US were China, Uzbekistan, Brazil, Kazakhstan, Colombia, Chile, Ecuador, Peru, Kuwait. Apart from the US and China, the rest are all emerging markets.
The cars these markets want have almost no overlap with the cars produced by that machine in North America.
And GM's position in these places is very uneven.
Mexico remains GM's stronghold, market share long second only to Nissan. South America slowed down in defense: In 2025, GM's share in Brazil dropped from 12.0% to 10.3%, Volkswagen rose to 17.1%, BYD rose to 4.4%.
The absence in the Middle East is even more obvious. In Saudi Arabia, GM has fallen out of the top mainstream brands, while SAIC MG has entered the top sales list. Africa has left a damaged network; Egypt still has manufacturing and operational systems, but GM has long exited the major business of South Africa and East Africa.
For Mexico and South America, SAIC-GM is defending the ring; for the Middle East, it's supplementing products; for Africa, there is a hint of returning to old markets.
02
Ultium Failed to Stitch GM Together
In 2014, Mary Barra became GM's first female CEO.
The GM she took over had just emerged from bankruptcy restructuring, still retaining a huge global business map. Opel and Vauxhall in Europe, Chevrolet laying networks in India, South Africa, and Southeast Asia, Holden stayed in Australia, Korea Daewoo system responsible for small cars, Brazil responsible for South American products.
These businesses allowed GM to maintain the image of a global automaker, but also kept it burdened with the costs of a global automaker for a long time.
Mary Barra adopted a clear financial standard. If a business cannot generate sufficient returns, it is no longer retained due to scale, history, or global status.
From 2015 to 2020, GM began to intensively take action against markets that could not generate sufficient shareholder returns, withdrawing from Europe, Russia, India, Southeast Asia, and Australia, selling Opel, Vauxhall, and the Thailand factory.
Profit discipline achieved results, capital gradually flowed to large cars North America was best at; the cost was that GM simultaneously dismantled the product system serving global needs.
Opel once provided front-wheel-drive sedans and European engineering capabilities, Holden mastered rear-wheel-drive platforms, Korea was responsible for low-cost small cars. After exiting these markets, GM also lost most of the capabilities to serve global needs.
By 2020, GM had basically completed global contraction. North America kept pickups, large SUVs, and high-profit fuel cars; China still had a huge joint venture system; markets like South America, Korea, Middle East were compressed into regional businesses maintaining their own profitability.
They were like isolated islands scattered on the world map. With the competitive landscape unchanged, they could continue to exist relying on inertia, contributing limited but stable profits.
But now, competition has intensified.
In 2025, the Brazilian car market continued to grow, but GM's share dropped from 12.0% to 10.3%; Volkswagen rose to 17.1%, BYD rose to 4.4%. In the Mexican market, GM's sales dropped 3.4%, while Nissan, Toyota, Kia, and Mazda all grew.
The results are written on GM's International Operations (GMI) report outside North America. In 2025, GMI wholesale sales dropped 8.1%, revenue dropped 3.3%; excluding Chinese joint venture business, adjusted EBIT dropped 32.8%, leaving only $426 million.
What these regional businesses lacked was not brand and channels, but a set of new products that could be continuously delivered to dealerships.
GM certainly knew the side effects of contraction. Once contraction was basically completed, Mary Barra had to find a new technical base, without re-establishing those regional R&D centers, to reconnect North America, China, and the remaining international markets.
Electric vehicles seemed to provide this opportunity exactly.
By 2019, Tesla had completed the difficult climb of Model 3, delivering 367,500 units for the year; the Shanghai factory from groundbreaking to delivery took less than a year, proving that a highly centralized model, battery, and software system can be quickly replicated between the US and China.
The signal from the capital market was more direct. In January 2020, Tesla's market value surpassed GM and Ford combined for the first time, and exceeded Toyota six months later. For GM which had just completed global contraction, electrification not only represents the future of the auto industry but also provides a shortcut to cover the global again without rebuilding the old system.
Starting in 2018, GM turned the funds saved after cutting losses to electrification and autonomous driving; by March 2020, GM officially released Ultium and promised to invest over $20 billion before 2025. China subsequently held the corresponding technology release.
Ultium's engineering ambition is huge. GM hopes it will simultaneously cover compact crossover vehicles, SUVs, Hummers, and large pickups, and allow North America and China to share scale, supply chain, and R&D costs.
But the product that first proved Ultium was the Hummer EV equipped with about 205 kWh batteries. This number is double the common battery capacity of China's mainstream large pure electric vehicles. From the beginning, Ultium was pulled towards American-style large cars by the goals of ultra-long range, thousand-horsepower power, and large pickups; it can continuously add modules to cover upwards, but it is difficult to use the same system to build down cheap models.
More fatally, GM bet on the wrong direction of market convergence. Ultium bet on highly modular battery cells, modules, and e-drive to拼出 as many models as possible; the place where markets truly form barriers has shifted to software, electrical/electronic architecture, and continuous iteration capabilities, while model diversity is actually converging.
In April 2026, GM notified suppliers to indefinitely postpone the development of the next generation Silverado EV and Sierra EV models; major platform updates are not expected until after 2030.
China, however, quickly shifted to lower-cost lithium iron phosphate, faster charging speeds, plug-in hybrids and range extender, and smart cockpits and assisted driving driven by local suppliers.
The base originally used to unify China and the US ultimately failed to connect either end.
Ultium did not stitch GM back together after it was dismantled. It left behind battery, e-drive, manufacturing, and safety verification capabilities, and made an inescapable conclusion: North America, China, and outside the US can no longer be defined by the same base.
03
SAIC-GM, Established Twice
At the end of 2024, SAIC-GM was not facing how to go global, but whether this company was worth continuing to exist.
That year, SAIC-GM sales dropped to 435,000 units, down 56.54% year-on-year, the largest decline among SAIC Motor's whole vehicle enterprises. In December, GM accrued 2.6 to 2.9 billion USD in impairment for its Chinese joint venture business, and confirmed about 2.7 billion USD in restructuring costs, totaling over 5 billion USD.
This money was both a settlement for the past and drew the survival line for SAIC-GM.
Ultium did not bring the expected transformation to the China business, and Detroit had no other mature global plan to send over. SAIC-GM must reduce scale, restore profitability, and rely on the China team to re-answer the most basic question: How exactly should the next generation of products be built.
In April 2025, the Xiaoyao Architecture and Buick's high-end new energy sequence Zhijing were released together.
Xiaoyao retained Ultium's e-drive, manufacturing, and safety accumulation, but the technical route has shifted to China: batteries switched to 6C Lithium Iron Phosphate, power covers pure electric, plug-in hybrid and range extender, electronic/electrical architecture also shifted to central computing.
More important than parameter changes is that product definition rights remain in China.
In the past, Pan Asia mainly adapted Detroit platforms for China. With Xiaoyao and Zhijing, technical routes, product forms, prices, and supply chains started to be defined by the China team.
The results came faster than expected.
Zhijing L7 first stabilized in the mid-to-large new energy sedan market; on April 22, 2026, Zhijing E7 went on sale, with the lowest trade-in equity price of 154,900 yuan, breaking 10,000 major orders within 90 minutes of launch, exceeding 10,000 deliveries in the first month, becoming the first joint venture new energy model to achieve this.
The reversal at the operational level started earlier. In 2025, SAIC-GM sales rebounded to 535,000 units, up 22.99% year-on-year; GM's business in China achieved profitability for consecutive quarters.
It first proved it no longer needed continuous blood transfusion from headquarters, and then proved that new energy vehicles defined by the China team can obtain the market.
Thus, the direction of renewal discussion changed. From whether SAIC-GM needed to continue existing to how to maximize its value.
This capability did not appear suddenly. In 1997, Pan Asia and SAIC-GM were established on the same day, going from localization, model modification all the way to whole vehicle forward development. In 2010, the new S-Orio developed throughout Pan Asia went on sale and went overseas; in over twenty years, it developed over 30 series and over 150 models for Buick, Chevrolet, and Cadillac.
In the past, this capability was mainly used to change GM's global products into what China needs. In the Zhijing era, the direction reversed; products defined by the China team began to fill the gaps in GM's global product line.
Chinese joint ventures outputting products in reverse is no longer an isolated case. Volkswagen, Nissan, Mazda, and Kia are all sending models developed and produced in China overseas.
The real difference is the scale of openness; the more important overseas profits and capacity are, the clearer the boundaries drawn by the foreign side are; the more the overseas system needs replenishment, the larger the space gained by the China team.
GM's speciality lies in that its most protected North American profit core has almost no conflict with products SAIC-GM can provide. What GM needs most to protect is large pickups and SUVs in North America, which happen to fill the product gaps in GM's overseas network.
South America, Korea, Middle East, and Africa still have GM's brands, factories, and channels, but new product supply has become thin. Incorporating Chinese models is faster and cheaper than rebuilding R&D systems for each region.
Eleven years ago, the Envision sailed from Yantai to the US, China's role in GM's global system was still a manufacturing base. Eleven years later, SAIC-GM went global again with products it defined itself.
What GM handed over was not a world still growing, but a network where channels are still valuable but products are increasingly cut off. What SAIC-GM obtained was not a ready-made market, but the power to repair it.
This 20-year contract is not just a continuation of the previous joint venture relationship. It is more like SAIC-GM's second establishment.
This article is original content by Auto Pixel (autopix)
Unauthorized, do not reproduce
8月，国内轮胎行业延续"需求弱、开工降、库存高位"的运行特征。从订单结构看，半钢胎受雪地胎排产支撑，内销出现边际改善，但欧盟贸易摩擦拖累出口，叠加国内替换需求增量不足，整体订单延续弱势。
全钢胎则随着北方高温缓解、南方汛期收尾，替换需求温和回暖，但运力过剩限制反弹空间，行业供应面或持续控产检修现状。
半钢胎：雪地胎托底内销，出口仍被拖累
从半钢胎样本企业订单情况来看，整体订单延续弱势运行，出口端压力尤为突出。
行业调研显示，42%的企业出口订单量较上月呈现不同程度的下跌，58%左右企业出口订单较上月持平。订单弱化的核心原因是欧盟反倾销制约。
为应对欧洲市场直供订单流失，企业一方面积极开拓其他海外市场以求整体订单稳定性，另一方面依托海外基地承接转移订单。
越南、泰国等东南亚中资基地2026年前四月对欧轮胎出口同比分别增长165%和147%，但东南亚整体产能已接近满负荷，短期难以完全补位。部分具备海外产能的企业海外基地订单饱满，但整体订单表现仍不及预期。
内销端出现边际改善信号。进入雪地胎排产期，各企业加大排产力度，对国内订单增量形成一定支撑。
然而，国内替换需求受消费降级、新能源车保有量提升带来换胎周期拉长等因素影响，整体增量受限，订单表现弱化。渠道前期储备库存高位，叠加市场看空预期不减，经销商备货谨慎，生产企业排产保守。
从产能利用率数据看，7月30日半钢胎样本企业产能利用率为63.98%，环比修复1.21个百分点，但同比仍下降6.00个百分点。
7月全月半钢胎产量约5077万条，环比下滑12.66%，同比下滑10.88%。产能利用率的环比回升，更多反映检修后的供给恢复，而非需求端的强劲扩张。
全钢胎：需求温和恢复，反弹空间受限
从全钢胎样本企业订单情况来看，整体稳中偏弱运行。出口订单方面，63%的全钢胎样本企业出口订单较上月稳定，33%的样本企业出口订单较上月减少，少量存增量预期。
非洲、中东、东南亚等地区订单仍相对较好，对整体形成支撑，但海外贸易摩擦仍存，限制整体增量。
内销端出现温和修复迹象。随着北方高温缓解、南方汛期逐步收尾，部分运输出车率回升，替换需求将温和修复。7月30日全钢胎样本企业产能利用率为63.80%；7月全月全钢胎产量1301万条，环比下滑1.66%，但同比增长2.04%。
然而，反弹空间受到明显制约。"车多货少"的现状依然存在，运价低迷抑制物流从业者的换胎意愿，全钢胎替换需求增量有限。
从库存端看，截至7月末，全钢胎样本企业成品库存周转天数约39.43天，半钢胎约45.56天。受控产影响，行业呈"被动去库"状态，周转天数环比改善，但绝对库存量仍处近年高位。
控产检修仍是短期常态
在这样的市场环境下，综合来看，企业控产、灵活检修的现状仍将持续。
根据隆众资讯对下周期产能利用率的预测调研显示，半钢胎样本中仅3.33%的企业存提升预期，10%的企业存下调预期，86.67%的企业表示开工平稳运行。
这一调研结果直观反映出企业的谨慎态度——在库存去化未取得实质性进展、出口订单未出现明确拐点之前，控产降负、灵活检修将是行业短期内的常态化操作。
对于轮胎企业而言，当前的核心矛盾不在供应端而在需求端。无论半钢的出口订单找回，还是全钢的替换需求修复，都需要时间。
在拐点到来之前，保持低库存、稳现金流，比盲目提产更为重要。
2026年上半年，我国汽车出口总量达531万辆，其中新能源汽车出口242万辆，同比增长70%。图为零跑B10、C10两款全球车型亮相2026印尼国际车展。
统计数据显示，2026年上半年，我国汽车出口总量达531万辆，同比增长53%；其中，新能源汽车出口242万辆，同比增长70%，进一步巩固了我国作为全球第一汽车出口大国的地位。
一方面，地缘政治风险推高全球油价，提升了中国新能源汽车的竞争力；另一方面，全球南方国家市场的持续扩容，让中国车企争相加速出海布局。对于志在挑战年销100万辆大关的零跑汽车来说，7月的成绩单更加印证了国内、国际双轮驱动的有效性。
据了解，零跑汽车国内市场7月交付101267台，同比翻倍，成为首个月销突破10万台的造车新势力。今年上半年，零跑汽车累计销售356487辆，同比增长约97%，是今年上半年唯一销量突破30万辆的新势力品牌。A10、B系列、C10、D19等车型多点开花，巩固了零跑汽车的增长根基。
近日，零跑携零跑B10及C10两款全球车型，亮相2026印尼国际车展，并正式宣布登陆印尼市场。零跑还与印尼Indomobil集团共同宣布，正式在印尼启动本地化KD组装生产，通过与Indomobil集团旗下PT National Assemblers深度合作，完成从产品输出到本地化全产业链布局的跨越。截至目前，零跑汽车已形成马来西亚、印尼双制造基地布局，成为东南亚少数拥有双KD产能的中国新能源品牌。
有分析认为，当前我国新能源汽车产业已形成“国内规模化托底，全球化增量扩容”的发展格局，二者不可偏废。例如，零跑率先突破10万台月销，标志造车新势力正式迈入主流车企量级，行业竞争从单一产品比拼，转向供应链、自研制造、渠道服务综合体系的长期较量。
近年来，中国新能源汽车出海已告别简单整车外销，转向“技术输出+本地建厂+生态共建”的全新阶段。据了解，依托与Stellantis、印尼Indomobil集团的三方协同，零跑采用品牌同店销售模式，借助当地成熟分销网络，计划年末建成50家印尼服务网点，覆盖售前、售后全链路。事实上，本地化生产不仅规避进口关税、缩短交付周期，还带动当地就业与配套产业链升级，契合东盟各国培育本土新能源产业的政策导向。截至目前，零跑海外业务共覆盖全球40余个国家和地区、2000余家门店，全球累计交付突破150万辆，东南亚本土化制造将成为其全球扩张关键支点。
“实践证明，零跑汽车正在成为中国新能源车企‘国内规模化、全球本土化’双轮驱动的典型样本。”独立汽车分析师白德认为，一方面，国内市场负责“造血、练兵、建产业链”，另一方面，国际市场负责“扩容、树标准、分风险”。只有用好国内、国际市场双轮驱动，才能让中国新能源汽车巩固全球领先优势，实现汽车产业高质量发展。
白德强调说，在取得规模化增长的基础上，中国新能源汽车必须持续加码技术创新。据透露，零跑汽车将在今年9月举办技术日，升级世界模型智驾系统，以低算力实现高阶智能驾驶普惠落地。
随着更多中国车企坚持技术立企，深耕前沿自研技术、完善产品矩阵、推进属地化产业布局，中国新能源产业的全球竞争优势将持续巩固，中国汽车产业升级与全球绿色交通转型进程也将进一步提速。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多人揀車嗰陣都會拿 Perodua Ativa 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多方面嚟做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你好省咗做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Ativa 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 62,500 - 73,400，一共 3 個版本，包括 1.0L Turbo X（RM 62,500）、1.0L Turbo H（RM 67,300）、1.0L Turbo AV（RM 73,400） 等。
Chery Tiggo Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 88,750 - 99,750，一共 2 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH（RM 99,750）、2025 1.5T Standard（RM 88,750） 等。
從價錢睇，Perodua Ativa 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo Cross 平咗 RM 26,250。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以满足日常需要。但要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，喺配備上可能會有所取舍，具體就要睇你嘅需要。
Perodua Ativa 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA。
Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Perodua Ativa 嘅 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲分別，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
Perodua Ativa 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Perodua Ativa 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo Cross 保養 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Perodua Ativa 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在乎性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總而言之，Perodua Ativa 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Ativa and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro when selecting a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time doing research.
Perodua Ativa OTR price in Malaysia is RM 62,500 - 73,400, there are 3 versions in total, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400), etc.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro OTR price in Malaysia is RM 123,750 - 123,750, there are 2 versions in total, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 125,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 140,000), etc.
From the price perspective, Perodua Ativa's starting price is indeed RM 61,250 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 7 Pro. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the few thousand cheaper amount might have trade-offs in specifications, depends on your needs.
Perodua Ativa comes with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro comes with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Chery Tiggo 7 Pro's 1.5L Turbo has 35 hp more than Perodua Ativa's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel lacking in power.
Perodua Ativa body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of the two cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. For this level of car, daily use is completely sufficient.
Perodua Ativa warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Perodua Ativa and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are both quite good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and test drive before making a final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending some time doing research will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
The OTR price of Perodua Aruz in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
The OTR price of Honda HR-V in Malaysia is RM 115,900 - 143,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.
From a price perspective, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 43,000 cheaper than Honda HR-V. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. However, note that the cheaper few thousand may involve compromises in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Perodua Aruz is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp power. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Honda HR-V is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp power. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Honda HR-V's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient and won't feel lacking.
Perodua Aruz body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Honda HR-V body length is 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, Honda HR-V's body is 100 mm longer than Perodua Aruz, offering an advantage in seating space. However, Perodua Aruz is more flexible for parking in the city, each has its trade-offs.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda HR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, both Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V are very good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will never be wrong.
© 2024 Bitauto.com. All Rights Reserved.
Bitauto (www.yiche.com and www.bitauto.com) is one of the most visited automotive websites in China. We provide detailed info on Chinese car brands available in your area. Please note that the information provided on this website is based on publicly available data and is for reference only. It may not be fully updated or accurate at all times.
Help us improve our website
