[Lead: The latest Q2 2026 financial report released by General Motors proves a fact: although multinational automakers face challenges in the new energy vehicle era, they still show tenacious vitality.]
Author: Zhang Dachuan
How is the life of multinational auto giants so far this year? Recently, General Motors presented a passable mid-term exam result.
The Q2 2026 financial report of General Motors shows that the company achieved revenue of $48 billion this quarter, up 1.9% year-on-year, higher than the market's prior expectation of $46.67 billion; Adjusted EBIT reached $3.9 billion, with the profit margin rising to 8.2%. Thanks to the positive expectations for annual operating performance and market prospects, the company raised its full-year performance guidance for the second time this year, increasing the Adjusted EBIT target range to $14 billion to $16 billion.

△ General Motors' Q2 financial report performance data was good
However, there is a drag factor in the report. Affected by about $2.3 billion in strategic restructuring expenses for the electric vehicle business, General Motors' net income attributable to shareholders for this quarter was $1.3 billion, a year-on-year decline of 31.1%. However, if this non-recurring factor is excluded, the company's core operating profitability has actually improved significantly compared to the same period last year, and overall performance remains robust.

△ Electric vehicle business strategic restructuring brought about a $2.3 billion expense impact
GM North America business profitability remains strong
The North American market remains the most important profit source for General Motors and the core foundation supporting its overall performance. In Q2 2026, GM's North American business achieved Adjusted EBIT of $3.446 billion, contributing the vast majority of the company's operating profit; the Adjusted EBIT margin further increased to 8.6%, up 2.5 percentage points year-on-year, with profitability continuing to strengthen.
This is mainly due to the continued strong sales of high-profit models under brands such as Chevrolet and GMC in the North American market. General Motors has held the title of best-selling full-size SUV in the US for 52 consecutive years and has ranked first in full-size pickup sales for 7 consecutive years, holding about a 43% market share in this high-profit segment. Even facing strong competitors such as Ford's F-Series and RAM under Stellantis, General Motors maintains its leading position through the synergy of multiple brands such as Chevrolet and GMC. The new generation Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra 1500 scheduled to launch in Q4 this year are expected to further consolidate its competitive advantage in North America's most profitable segment.

△ General Motors holds about a 43% market share in the North American full-size pickup segment
Compared to the electric vehicle business which is still in an adjustment phase, General Motors' intelligent connected business is gradually growing into a new profit growth engine, with the profitability of software subscriptions and digital services continuing to be released. The report shows that by the end of Q2, OnStar deferred revenue reached $6.3 billion, up nearly 50% year-on-year, providing a solid foundation for continued recognition of future software service revenue; Super Cruise confirmed revenue grew by about 70% year-on-year, maintaining a high-speed growth trend. Compared to traditional vehicle business, software and digital services have higher gross margins and stronger sustainable profitability. As related business scales continue to expand, General Motors will not only be able to generate more recurring income throughout the vehicle lifecycle but also optimize the revenue structure and improve overall profit quality and financial performance.

△ General Motors' intelligent connected business is gradually growing into a new profit growth engine
SAIC-GM's strategic status rises
In General Motors' Q2 2026 financial report, the China business remains under close attention. Although General Motors has continued to scale back investments in China in recent years, the equity earnings from the China business still grew by 16.9% year-on-year and have been profitable for seven consecutive quarters, showing strong operational resilience.
As the most important joint venture for General Motors in China, SAIC-GM's performance was also commendable. According to the June production and sales quick report released by SAIC Motor, in the first half of 2026, SAIC-GM's cumulative wholesale sales reached 231,200 units, a year-on-year decline of 5.68%, significantly better than the overall domestic passenger car market decline of 20.2%, and it is one of the mainstream joint venture automakers with the smallest sales decline. This is mainly due to the stable performance of main models such as Buick GL8, Envision family, and new LaCrosse. At the same time, SAIC-GM's new energy business grew rapidly, with sales close to 50,000 units in the first half of the year, up 81.1% year-on-year. Among them, Buick Zhijing E7 launched in April contributed more than 60% of the new energy sales and is becoming a new growth engine.

△ SAIC-GM outperformed the domestic overall car market in the first half of the year
It is worth noting that SAIC-GM may play a more important strategic role in the future. Relying on China's leading advantages in new energy and intelligence, SAIC-GM is gradually transforming from a market and profit contributor in the past to an important output platform for General Motors' global technological innovation. Taking the "Xiao Yao" super integrated architecture equipped with Zhijing E7 as an example, General Motors has already upgraded its battery wireless management system and thermal runaway protection standards to global safety standards for mid-level models. In early 2026, Buick and Chevrolet new energy models built on this architecture have entered the Mexican, Thai, and Brazilian markets in CKD form, with core three-electric systems and intelligent control modules supplied by Chinese factories. In the future, General Motors also plans to apply the "Xiao Yao" architecture's smart cockpit and intelligent driving underlying technology to mid-size pure electric SUVs in the North American market by 2027.

△ SAIC-GM is gradually transforming into an important output platform for General Motors' global technological innovation
Foreign automakers have not lost competitiveness
General Motors' financial report shows that in the new energy vehicle era, although multinational automakers face huge challenges, they have not truly lost competitiveness, and their operating concepts and system capabilities are still worth reference for Chinese automakers.
First, shifting from scale competition to profit competition. Compared to many domestic automakers that still view sales and market share as the primary goal, General Motors focuses more on profitability and shareholder returns. Relying on high-profit pickups, large SUVs, and Cadillac products, General Motors has built a mature product structure and brand premium system. Even though sales are no longer at the top globally, it can still maintain high per-car profits and ample cash flow. This also shows that for automotive enterprises, true competition is not just about selling more cars, but selling more valuable and more profitable cars.

△ Even though sales are no longer at the top globally, General Motors can still maintain high per-car profits and ample cash flow
Second, building long-term competitiveness, rather than pursuing short-term explosions. General Motors' century-long development history shows that an enterprise's core competitiveness comes not only from the products themselves but also from brand accumulation, global operation systems, and continuous operating capabilities. From R&D, procurement, and manufacturing to quality management and compliance governance, mature system capabilities allow enterprises to have resilience across industry cycles. As Chinese automakers accelerate their global layout, these "soft powers" will also become an important foundation for building world-class automotive groups.

△ Chinese automakers need to compete with multinational automaker giants like General Motors in the long term
Finally, multinational automakers still have certain competitive advantages. Currently, Chinese automakers have established a leading advantage with new energy and intelligence, but the global automotive industry's competitive landscape is far from settled. General Motors, Toyota, Volkswagen, and other multinational automakers still possess strong financial strength, global brand influence, mature manufacturing systems, and stable profitability; once they make breakthroughs in key technologies such as electrification and intelligent driving and form synergy with their own global operation capabilities, they still have the potential to reshape competitive advantages. In the future, competition in the global automotive industry is more likely to be a long-term game between Chinese automakers' innovation advantages and multinational automakers' system advantages, rather than a simple "who replaces who".
Commentary
In the new energy vehicle era, competition is already not just about sales, but a comprehensive test of profitability, system capability, and globalization capability. Chinese automakers are redefining technological innovation, while multinational automakers still possess deep brand accumulation, operating experience, and financial strength. In the future, competition in the global automotive industry will not be a simple "new forces replacing old giants," but more likely a long-term race between innovation advantages and operational advantages.
(This article is original to Heyan Yueche, unauthorized reprinting is prohibited)

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會揾 Proton X50 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 比較。兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近,今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細比較,幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300,一共有 4 個型號,包括 1.5T Executive(RM 89,800)、1.5T Premium(RM 101,800)、1.5T Flagship(RM 113,300) 等。
Toyota Corolla Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 133,800 - 148,800,一共有 3 個型號,包括 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport(RM 148,800)、2026 HEV 1.8L Standard(RM 140,800)、2026 1.8L Standard(RM 133,800) 等。
從價格睇落,Proton X50 嘅起價確實比 Toyota Corolla Cross 平咗 RM 44,000。如果你預算有限,Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意,平嗰幾千蚊,可能喺配備上要有取舍,具體要睇你嘅需求。

Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl,馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Toyota Corolla Cross 搭載 1.5L Turbo,馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
动力方面,Toyota Corolla Cross 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開,兩款車嘅動力都夠用,唔會覺得唔夠力。

Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Toyota Corolla Cross 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 TSS (PCS, LDA, ACC, LTA)。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣,喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差,唔使太擔心呢一點。

Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Toyota Corolla Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Toyota 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感覺,建議試車比較。

Proton X50 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇,適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價,可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款;如果你更在意性價比同配備,就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試車,親身體驗先係最重要。

總體嚟講,Proton X50 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊部,關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,先至去試車做最終決定。買車係件大事,花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Honda CR-V when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The Honda CR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 178,200 - 195,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200), etc.
From a price perspective, the Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 88,400 cheaper than the Honda CR-V. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the savings of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.

Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Honda CR-V is equipped with a 2.0L 4-cyl, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Honda CR-V's 2.0L 4-cyl has 65 more horsepower than the Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power and won't feel underpowered.

Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Honda CR-V safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New cars nowadays generally have good safety, so no need to worry too much about this.

Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Honda CR-V body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, the Honda CR-V body is 100 mm longer than the Proton X50, giving it an advantage in passenger space. However, the Proton X50 is more flexible for parking in the city, each has its trade-offs.

Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda CR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.

Overall, both Proton X50 and Honda CR-V are quite good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and going for a test drive before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not be wrong.

In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Toyota Yaris Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of the Toyota Yaris Cross in Malaysia is RM 99,900 - 109,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Standard (RM 99,900), 2026 HEV 1.5L Standard (RM 109,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of the Proton X50 is indeed RM 10,100 cheaper than the Toyota Yaris Cross. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But keep in mind, the few thousand cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.

The safety rating of the Proton X50 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of the Toyota Yaris Cross is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include TSS.
Both cars have the same safety rating. Safety features are quite comprehensive for this class. Safety of new cars nowadays is not bad, no need to worry too much about this point.

The Proton X50 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The Toyota Yaris Cross body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, and the interior space difference is not significant. Cars in this class are more than enough for daily use.

Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Toyota Yaris Cross warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.

Both the Proton X50 and Toyota Yaris Cross are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.

Overall, the Proton X50 and Toyota Yaris Cross are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several dealers, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will never be wrong.

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拎 Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-3 做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近,而家我哋就由多個方面做一次詳細對比,幫你攞返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300,一共有 3 個版本,包括 1.5L Standard 2WD(RM 106,800)、1.5L Executive 2WD(RM 115,800)、1.5L Premium 2WD(RM 122,300) 等。
Mazda CX-3 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 126,159 - 139,159,一共有 2 個版本,包括 2023 2.0L High(RM 139,159)、2023 2.0L Plus(RM 126,159) 等。
由價錢嚟睇,Proton X70 嘅起步價確實比 Mazda CX-3 平咗 RM 19,359。如果你預算有限,Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但要留意,平嗰幾千蚊,可能喺配備上有取舍,具體要睇你嘅需求。

Proton X70 搭載 1.5L Turbo,馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Mazda CX-3 搭載 1.5L Turbo,馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩款車用嘅係同一套動力系統,日常開起嚟嘅感受基本冇分別。油耗方面都差不多,唔使太糾結這一點。

Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Mazda CX-3 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣,喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差,唔使太擔心這一點。

Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm,車尾箱 400 L。
Mazda CX-3 車身長 4500 mm,車尾箱 450 L。
空間方面,Mazda CX-3 嘅車身比 Proton X70 長咗 100 mm,乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Proton X70 喺城市入面停車會靈活啲,各有取舍。
Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-3 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇,適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更加看重品牌口碑同二手價,可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款;如果你更加在意性價比同配備,就嗰款配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕,親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總嚟講,Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-3 都係馬來西亞市場好好嘅車型。揀邊一輛,關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。希望大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Toyota Corolla Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Toyota Corolla Cross OTR price in Malaysia is RM 133,800 - 148,800, with a total of 3 versions, including 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport (RM 148,800), 2026 HEV 1.8L Standard (RM 140,800), 2026 1.8L Standard (RM 133,800), etc.
From a price perspective, Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 44,000 cheaper than Toyota Corolla Cross. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the difference in a few thousand may involve trade-offs in equipment, depending on your specific requirements.

Proton X50 is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Toyota Corolla Cross is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Toyota Corolla Cross's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more hp than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily driving in the city, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel lacking.

Proton X50 Warranty 5 years/150,000km, Service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Toyota Corolla Cross Warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, Service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.

Proton X50 and Toyota Corolla Cross are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both models; personal experience is the most important.

Overall, Proton X50 and Toyota Corolla Cross are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a major event, spending time on research will definitely not be a mistake.

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 8 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾近嘅,今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較,幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300,總共有 4 個版本,包括 1.5T Executive(RM 89,800)、1.5T Premium(RM 101,800)、1.5T Flagship(RM 113,300) 等。
Chery Tiggo 8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,750 - 129,750,總共有 1 個版本,包括 2026 1.6T Standard(RM 129,750) 等。
從價錢來看,Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 8 平咗 RM 39,950。如果你預算有限,Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意,平啲嘅幾千蚊,可能喺配備上有取舍,具體要睇你嘅需求。

Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo 8 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Chery 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受,建議試駕比較。

Proton X50 保用 5 年/150,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 8 保用 3 年/100,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 8 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇,適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價,可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款;如果你更在意性價比同配備,那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕,親身體驗先係最重要。

總嘅嚟講,Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 8 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛,關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X70 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近,今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較,幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300,一共有 3 個版本,包括 1.5L Standard 2WD(RM 106,800)、1.5L Executive 2WD(RM 115,800)、1.5L Premium 2WD(RM 122,300) 等。
Toyota Yaris Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 99,900 - 109,900,一共有 2 個版本,包括 2026 1.5L Standard(RM 99,900)、2026 HEV 1.5L Standard(RM 109,900) 等。
由價錢睇,Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅起步價比 Proton X70 平咗 RM 6,900。老實講,喺呢個價位段,幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大,關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。

Proton X70 裝 1.5L Turbo,馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Toyota Yaris Cross 裝 1.5L 4-cyl,馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
動力方面,Proton X70 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力,中段加速更有信心,尤其係行高速公路超車嘅時候。不過 Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅油耗可能會抵啲,日常市區通勤差別唔會太大。

Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm,尾箱 400 L。
Toyota Yaris Cross 車身長 4400 mm,尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣,車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車,日常使用完全夠用。

Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Toyota Yaris Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣,都係 FWD,日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Proton X70 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇,適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價,可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款;如果你更介意性價比同配備,嗰就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後始終建議兩款都去試駕,親自體驗先係最重要。
總嚟講,Proton X70 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛,關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,先再試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會用 Proton X70 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾相近,今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較,幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300,一共有 3 個版本,包括 1.5L Standard 2WD(RM 106,800)、1.5L Executive 2WD(RM 115,800)、1.5L Premium 2WD(RM 122,300)等。
Toyota Yaris Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 99,900 - 109,900,一共有 2 個版本,包括 2026 1.5L Standard(RM 99,900)、2026 HEV 1.5L Standard(RM 109,900)等。
從價錢嚟睇,Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅起步價比 Proton X70 平咗 RM 6,900。老實講,喺呢個價位段,幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大,關鍵始終係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。

Proton X70 配備 1.5L Turbo,馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Toyota Yaris Cross 配備 1.5L 4-cyl,馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
動力方面,Proton X70 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力,中段加速更有信心,尤其係行高速超車嗰陣。不過 Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅油耗可能更抵,日常市區通勤分別唔會太大。

Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 TSS。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣,喺呢個級別裡面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔錯,唔使太擔心呢一點。

Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Toyota Yaris Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣,都係 FWD,日常駕駛感受唔會太大分別。
Proton X70 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇,適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價,可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款;如果你更介意性價比同配備,就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終始終建議兩款都去試駕,親自體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講,Proton X70 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛,關鍵始終都要睇你個人嘅需求同預算。建議大家做功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再去試駕做最終決定。買車係一件大事,花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

25 Julai 2026, Pavilon Sains Fiksi Chengdu. Kumpulan Chery jumlah kumulatif penjualan kereta global melebihi 20 juta unit, dan unit ke-20 juta yang dihantar ini, adalah "IP Generasi Pertama" Chery iaitu Fengyun. Dari keluaran "Fengyun" pertama pada Disember 1999 di Wuhu hingga 2026 Fengyun A9 sebagai unit ke-20 juta dihantar, Chery menyelesaikan litar tertutup yang sangat bermakna secara simbolik selama 29 tahun.

"Selepas 20 juta unit, kami tidak lagi menyertai perlumbaan dalaman." Kalimat Presiden Chery Automobile Yin Tongyue ini, baru boleh benar-benar difahami apabila dimasukkan ke dalam kerangka kerja perniagaan permulaan Chery selama 29 tahun.
· Dari "Rumah Rumput Kecil" ke 20 Juta: Lengkung Kebangkitan Penyelidikan dan Pembangunan Sendiri

Mac 1997, "Kilang Enjin Pertama" Chery dimulakan di sebidang tanah kering di utara bandar Wuhu, memukul tiang pertama. Pada masa itu, dua kenyataan tersebar dalam industri kereta China: "Tanpa kerjasama sama pemilik tiada jalan hidup, tanpa skala satu juta unit jangan bincang penyelidikan dan pembangunan sendiri."
Chery malah tidak mempercayai hal ini. Mei 1999, enjin penyelidikan dan pembangunan sendiri yang pertama berjaya menyala pada percubaan pertama, mematahkan mitos "Orang China tidak boleh buat enjin sendiri"; Disember 1999, kereta "Fengyun" nombor 000001 keluar dari loji, membuka "dari 0 ke 1" buat kereta sendiri; Oktober 2001, 10 unit Fengyun pertama dieksport ke Syria melalui Pelabuhan Tianjin, membuka jalan pertama eksport kereta China secara pukal; Ogos 2007, unit ke-1 juta keluar dari loji, menjadi jenama sendiri pertama melepasi "ambang satu juta unit"; Disember 2015, unit ke-5 juta keluar dari loji; 2025, Chery tersenarai di Bursa Saham Hong Kong; 25 Julai 2026, jumlah kumulatif penjualan global melebihi 20 juta unit.

Dari 5 juta unit pertama mengambil 16 tahun hingga 5 juta unit ketiga hanya mengambil kurang dari 3 tahun — kecuraman lengkung penjualan, di sebaliknya adalah laluan peningkatan sistem teknologi dari mengejar ke memimpin. Sekarang, persediaan teknologi Chery telah dilanjutkan ke sel bateri, cip, memandu pintar, bateri pepejal, kereta terbang, robot manusia dan bidang terulung lain, "teori takdir kerjasama sama pemilik" dan "teori ambang skala" runtuh sendiri di hadapan hasil perkembangan yang nyata.
· Kereta dan Komponen: Contoh Daya Saing Global Bandar Kereta Wuhu

2001, 10 unit Fengyun pertama Chery dieksport ke Timur Tengah. Hari ini, 25 tahun kemudian, jumlah eksport terkumpul Chery sudah menghampiri 7 juta unit, berturut-turut 23 tahun memegang teratas eksport jenama kereta penumpang China, pengguna luar negara lebih dari 6.23 juta.
Tetapi cerita "kereta siap" Chery, memang bukan perang seorang diri. Di Wuhu, Anhui, Chery telah mendorong hampir 4,000 buah perusahaan sepadan komponen beraneka jenis, membentuk kumpulan industri kereta dengan daya saing global. Dari siri enjin ACTECO hingga transmisi automatik tanpa gegelengan (CVT), dari keseluruhan arkitektur kuasa "Tenaga Kun Peng Chery Power" hingga konfigurasi hibrid penuh fungsi DHT, Chery adalah yang pertama mempunyai keupayaan produksi massal kesatuan kuasa dengan hak milik intelek sepenuhnya.
Lebih menarik, Chery juga berada di hadapan dalam eksport komponen — Mac 2006, enjin Chery pertama dieksport ke Amerika Syarikat, membuka jalan pertama komponen teras kereta China masuk ke pasaran Eropah dan Amerika secara terbalik. Laluan eksport "kereta siap + komponen" dua garis ini,正是 asas penting Chery berbeza dari jenama sendiri lain.
· Kewangan dan Modal: "Pengisian Semula Amunisi" Selepas Tersenarai di Bursa Hong Kong

2025, Chery tersenarai di Bursa Saham Hong Kong, ini adalah lompatan penting dalam sejarah pembangunan Chery. Dari perniagaan permulaan sendiri hingga kumpulan kewangan perindustrian yang memukul loceng di Bursa Saham Hong Kong, keupayaan operasi modal Chery, sendiri sudah menjadi contoh satu tahap kedewasaan industri kereta China.
Yin Tongyue menyatakan dengan jelas, dana yang dikumpul Bursa Hong Kong kebanyakannya digunakan untuk penyelidikan dan pembangunan, perniagaan luar negara dan pelaburan untuk pergerakan masa depan, fokus pada empat sektor Elektrifikasi, Kecerdasan, AI, Berat Ringan. Ini menandakan Chery dari "kemandirian" menuju ke fasa baharu "modal perindustrian + modal kewangan" pemacu dua roda.
· Teknologi Cerdas dan Robot Manusia: "Tiang Kedua" Chery

18 Mac 2025, pada sidang strategi kecerdasan Chery, Yin Tongyue mengucapkan kalimat yang diulang-ulang oleh industri: "28 tahun lalu kami memukul tiang pertama untuk membina loji, hari ini kami perlu memukul tiang kedua — tiang AI kecerdasan."
Falcon Autopilot, 2025 mencapai pemasangan pada semua model semua jenama, sistem memandu pintar tahap L4 end-to-end produksi pertama "Falcon Robocar" sudah kelihatan; Mo Jia robot manusia, Chery melabur dalam bidang robot manusia, dari buat kereta sampai buat robot; Pada masa pameran kereta Beijing 2026, mencapai kerjasama strategik mendalam dengan Nvidia (kuasa pengiraan autopilot), Bosch (arkitektur elektrik), Qualcomm (cip kabin), Vulkan Engine (model awan besar), CATL (rangkaian pengisian), beralih dari "pelanggan pembekal" ke "definisi bersama".
· Ekosistem Keluar Negara: Dari "Jual Kereta" ke "Menjadi Sebahagian Setempat"

Semester 1 2026, eksport Kumpulan Chery 943,800 unit, meningkat 71.5% setanding tahun, berturut-turut 4 bulan merobek rekod eksport bulanan syarikat kereta China, purata setiap 17 saat ada satu unit Chery dihantar ke luar negara. Tetapi di sebalik nombor, lebih patut ditulis adalah evolusi konsep eksport Chery — "Di Sini, Untuk Sini, Menjadi Sebahagian Sini".
Pertama adalah tempatanisasi R&D. Membina rangkaian inovasi berkongsi global "1+7+N", 8 pusat penyelidikan global; April 2026 Sepanyol Barcelona mengaktifkan pusat operasi wilayah luar negara pertama, serentak memulakan Institut Penyelidikan Sepanyol. Kedua adalah tempatanisasi pembuatan. Bersama Sepanyol EV MOTORS kerjasama hidup semula jenama EBRO; Projek produksi tempatan Afrika Selatan dijangka 2027 model pertama masuk pengeluaran. Ketiga adalah tempatanisasi bakat. Pekerja bakat antarabangsa melebihi 20 ribu orang, pekerja tempatan mencapai peratusan 85%. Akhir adalah peng高端an pasaran. Chery sudah masuk 18 negara pasaran Eropah, suku pertama 2026 eksport Eropah 90,579 unit, meningkat 170%; Jenama Jaecoo 2025 menjadi jenama kereta pertumbuhan paling cepat United Kingdom dalam 10 tahun.
Globalisasi sebenar, bukan semata-mata eksport produk, tetapi "R&D, Pembuatan, Jenama, Budaya" masuk penuh ekosistem. Chery sedang dari "ekspor perdagangan" menuju ke "pengakaran ekosistem" — ini adalah catatan baharu Yin Tongyue tulis untuk globalisasi.
· Tanggungjawab Sosial: Anggap ESG sebagai "Mata Pelajaran Wajib" Globalisasi

Dalam "Laporan ESG Chery Automobile 2025", Chery dengan jelas menyatakan sasaran 2037 mencapai neutraliti operasi sendiri, 2047 mencapai neutraliti karbon keseluruhan rantaian nilai. Sekarang, peratusan tenaga hijau asas kereta Chery sudah melebihi 52%, teknologi aloium karbon rendah penyelidikan dan pembangunan sendiri boleh mengurangkan besar emisi kitaran hidup penuh.
Lebih bermakna ialah "perniagaan baik" Chery. Bersama Pertubuhan UNICEF menyambung perjanjian kerjasama global, menjanjikan terus melabur 6 juta dolar AS memajukan kemajuan pendidikan global, sebelumnya kerjasama sudah membantu hampir 40 juta belia global mendapat pendidikan berkualiti; Bersama IUCN kerjasama, menjalankan projek pemulihan ekologi laut Sepanyol dan perlindungan hutan bakau Malaysia; 2024 bersama 10 pembekal utama mengeluarkan "Inisiatif Rantaian Bekalan Berterusan Chery Automobile", berturut-turut 2 tahun masuk "Senarai Kesan ESG China Fortune", dan menjadi satu-satunya perusahaan kereta dipilih dalam "Penilaian Perusahaan Industri Berusaha Baik Keberlanjutan Forbes China 2024-2025".
Seperti apa yang Yin Tongyue sebut, pengalaman globalisasi Chery ialah — "Pergi ke tempat orang tak boleh pergi, tak berani pergi dan tak mahu pergi". Dan keaslian jangka masa panjang ini, juga menukar "ke mana-mana, buat nilai untuk tempat setempat" perlumbaan dua arah.
2027, Chery akan sambut "tiga puluh tahun berdiri". Dari 1999 keluaran Fengyun pertama hingga 2026 Fengyun A9 sebagai unit ke-20 juta dihantar — "kereta sukan elektrik murni pintar cantik jarak jauh" ini memuat, adalah hasil peningkatan iterasi model globalisasi generasi pertama Chery, juga titik permulaan baharu "bergerak ke arah keindahan" Chery. Ia lengkapkan sepenuhnya siri Fengyun Energi Terbaharu hibrid sisip, pelengkap, elektrik murni tiga luan kuasa, menandakan pelaksanaan sepenuhnya Elektrifikasi 2.0 Chery.
29 tahun, Chery memencet tepat dua persimpangan sejarah industri kereta China dari "pasar tukar teknologi" ke "eksport teknologi", dari "eksport produk" ke "eksport ekosistem". 20 juta unit, bukan akhir, tetapi garis mula baharu Chery dari "kereta China" menuju ke "kereta global".

Even since first shaking hands with FIFA in 1999, Hyundai Kia locked the World Cup official cooperation until 2030, Chinese automakers still took a different path, each opening a door for themselves.
Changan went to Lisbon, signed the Portugal national team; GAC dug into Mexico City, bound to the century-old club Toluca FC; Chery directly revived the Spanish local brand EBRO from decades ago, allowing it to stand by the Spain team as "one of them"; BYD and Geely though didn't touch teams, but via CCTV broadcasts and Xiaohongshu, stuffed the brand into fans' mobile phone screens.

A few years ago at the Qatar World Cup, Chinese automakers were still erecting billboards on the sidelines. A few years later, Chinese independent brands have learned to "take a detour to enter". In the past, many believed there was a cognitive barrier between Chinese automakers going global with products and going global with brands. Now, this is no longer a problem. From government procurement to youth training, from national team IP to local clubs, Chinese automakers are using the World Cup as a lever to complete the critical leap from "product going global" to "brand going global".
The Miracle of Cape Verde, BYD's Foresight
Many feel that the Cape Verde Ambassador to China announcing all national official vehicles will switch to BYD is a friendly diplomatic gesture. In reality, the strategy behind this decision is far more complex than it appears on the surface.
Cape Verde is composed entirely of islands, no oil and gas resources, fuel entirely imported. BYD gives not just cars, but a whole "PV + Electric Vehicle" solution. This approach is helping Chinese automakers open a government vehicle market previously held by German and Japanese systems. Several countries in West and East Africa, also struggling under fuel import costs, have started follow-up research.
And the gain BYD made from this matter in Cape Verde is far more than just a few government orders. From another angle, Cape Verde's World Cup dark horse story equaled a free global brand promotion for BYD. An island nation with 540,000 population, continuously drawing Spain and Uruguay to a stalemate, dragging defending champion Argentina into extra time, this not only made the world remember Cape Verde, but also made fans remember the BYD logo on Cape Verde's official fleet. The gold content of this brand exposure is higher than any ad placement. The Cape Verde Ambassador to China voluntarily announcing the procurement decision in front of media is equivalent to globally backing Chinese new energy brands with official status. This recognition is something money cannot buy.

For BYD, betting on a correct team is not the ultimate goal, the long-term gain behind each bet is the key. BYD previously supported the private youth training organization "China Football Minors", which has successively won the Thailand Asian Youth Cup and Italy's "Little World Cup". During the World Cup, BYD also funded Football Minors to go to Brazil and Mexico to play friendly matches with local power youth training teams. They walked into the Azteca Stadium to watch the World Cup match on site, and also visited BYD's overseas largest production base in Camaçari, Brazil. For these children playing football, seeing with their own eyes that Chinese brands own factories of such scale in a foreign land is more direct than any patriotic education class. For BYD, what this investment seeks is not what these children can bring today, but many years later, when these children become the backbone of society, their memory starting point regarding football, the world, and Chinese car brands is BYD.
Looking at these moves together, BYD's route is clear. Whether there is a FIFA official sponsor logo spot doesn't matter, start cultivating deeply from the soil of youth training, start infiltration from government procurement in African island nations, use CCTV and Xiaohongshu channels to reach consumers. The same money, spent on short-term exposure is a one-time consumption, spent on brand mindset building is compound interest. When other brands are still calculating ad conversion rates, BYD is already doing compound interest investment on brand assets.

After this World Cup ends, the dark horse popularity of Cape Verde will eventually fade, but BYD's charging piles and after-sales service network there will not withdraw; whether Football Minors will go to the World Cup in the future, no one knows, but those children's recognition of the brand will not disappear. What BYD wants is always the long-term benefits brought by three lines running in parallel.
Changan's 500 Million Bet, The Ambition of a New Central Enterprise Going Global Behind It
For this World Cup, Changan made a big gamble. On May 22, 2026, Changan Motors signed in Lisbon with the Portuguese Football Association, becoming the Portuguese National Team's Global Official Partner. 2026, 2030 two World Cups, plus two Women's World Cups, total investment over 500 million yuan, this is the first time a Chinese car brand has reached global cooperation with a European top football national team.
Choosing Portugal, what did Changan see? The 2026 US-Canada-Mexico World Cup is the 41-year-old Ronaldo's 6th, and also last World Cup journey. Ronaldo's Instagram followers exceed 660 million, global coverage over 1 billion fans. The distribution of Portugal team fans, just in Europe, Southeast Asia, Central and South America, Middle East Africa, highly overlaps with Changan's core going global markets. This is not generalized brand exposure, but a placement precise to user portraits.

As a new central state-owned enterprise, Changan has goals to achieve. After restructuring, Changan proposed the "1445" strategy, aiming to break into the top 10 global automakers by 2030, with overseas sales rising from 637,300 units in 2025 to 1.5 million units in 2030. In the first half of 2026, Changan delivered 402,000 units overseas, up 35.1% year-on-year, with overseas business share rising to 33.6%. Changan needs to accelerate towards its target. If the World Cup bet is correct, combined with Changan New Energy's "Shangri-La Plan" cumulative investment exceeding 100 billion, and the confidence brought by core technologies like "Golden Bell" battery and solid-state batteries, it will have a good positive significance for achieving its goals.

Of course, this 500 million bet also has risks. Portugal group stage 1-1 draw Congo (DRC), 5-0 win Uzbekistan, 0-0 draw Colombia, qualify as group second, then eliminate Croatia. Round of 16, Portugal plays archrival Spain. Although ultimately defeated, Ronaldo's influence is enough to enable Changan to leverage larger global volume. However, for Changan, this account is not calculated for short-term ROI, how much position this money can make the brand occupy in global consumers' hearts, is the more important thing.
From "Detour" to "Rooting", Playing a Differentiated Chess Game
FIFA automotive official sponsorship is locked by Hyundai Kia until 2030, for many Chinese car manufacturers, this is not a big problem. GAC, Chery, Geely take a detour to "open doors", each playing a differentiated chess game.
GAC chose the "Localization" route, signing a two-year strategic partnership with Mexico's Toluca FC directly this May. Toluca FC was founded in 1917 and has won the CONCACAF Champions Cup three times. In 2025, China exported 625,200 vehicles to Mexico, which has surpassed Russia to become the top destination for Chinese car exports. GAC binding with Toluca FC equates to embedding the brand into Mexico's fervent football culture, completing the leap from "entering the market" to "taking root in the market".

Chery's approach is more subtle, not sponsoring the Spanish national team in the name of "Chery", but reviving the Spanish domestic brand EBRO born decades ago, also considered a "roundabout way to save the country". In April 2024, Chery signed an agreement with Spain's EV MOTORS under the witness of Prime Minister Sanchez, establishing a joint venture in Barcelona to restart EBRO. In 2025, EBRO became the official sponsor of the Spanish National Football Team. At this World Cup, Spain topped the group stage with 2 wins and 1 draw, eliminated Austria 3-0 in the Round of 16, and won 1-0 against Portugal in the Round of 8 to advance to the quarterfinals, with zero goals conceded in six games so far. EBRO's brand logo continues to appear before global fans with every victory of the Spanish team.
Some might wonder why Chery uses a hidden approach to back the team? In fact, gaining local recognition for a brand going global is a matter to be planned for the long term, selling cars before this is equally important. For Chery, whether the logo on the steering wheel is EBRO or Chery makes no difference to Chery's financial reports. For Spanish consumers, this is "a local brand supporting a local team". Chery hiding behind the curtain easily gains emotional recognition from local consumers, so why not? Chery's overseas performance has always been "capable", and after this World Cup, Chery's overseas "gains" may continue to amplify with the team's performance. The approach of "technology empowerment + local brand" can instead yield real profits.

Geely chose another path: "Focusing back" on the domestic market. Geely Galaxy became a partner for the CCTV World Cup broadcast, exclusively naming CCTV-5's "The Football Grand Banquet", simultaneously launching "Football Carnival Season" distributing car purchase vouchers daily. The Galaxy brand's main battlefield is domestic; borrowing this World Cup super IP to complete a leap in brand popularity is the most cost-effective choice. Meanwhile, Geely's Mexico subsidiary offered free airport pick-ups for car owners watching matches during the World Cup, equivalent to building the brand domestically and providing service overseas, running both lines in parallel.

Three roads, three judgments, but pointing to the same conclusion: Chinese car manufacturers' going global path is no longer as simple and straightforward as before, independent brands have begun to seek "smarter" paths.
Conclusion
BYD proves the value of long-termism through multiple lines; Changan declares the determination of a new central enterprise going global with a 500 million bet; GAC, Chery, and Geely demonstrate the diverse possibilities of Made in China through differentiated paths. And what is more comforting than these is that Chinese automakers are no longer obsessed with "selling products" or finding "ad spots". Building brands and setting up ecosystems on global stages like the World Cup means that Chinese independent brands now have the major premise for victory in their "extra time" on the world arena.

In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X50's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 159,750 - 159,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 130,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 145,000), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 69,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 8 Pro. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level model can already meet daily needs. But be aware that the few thousand difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.

Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl engine, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro is equipped with a 2.0L 4-cyl engine, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Chery Tiggo 8 Pro's 2.0L 4-cyl has 65 more horsepower than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power and won't feel underpowered.

Proton X50's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro's safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received decent ratings. However, Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro's Basic have some functional differences. If you value active safety, you can compare the feature lists of both carefully.

Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. For cars in this class, daily use is more than enough.
Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with more configurations. Ultimately, we recommend test driving both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending some time on research will never be wrong.

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都拿 Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 9 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近,今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比,幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300,一共有 4 個版本,包括 1.5T Executive(RM 89,800)、1.5T Premium(RM 101,800)、1.5T Flagship(RM 113,300) 等。
Chery Tiggo 9 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 166,800 - 179,800,一共有 1 個版本,包括 2026 2.0T Standard(RM 179,750) 等。
從價錢嚟睇,Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 9 便宜咗 RM 77,000。如果你預算有限,Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但要留意,便宜嗰幾千蚊,可能喺配備上會有取捨,具體要看你嘅需求。

Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl,馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 9 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl,馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面,Chery Tiggo 9 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 65 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開,兩款車嘅動力都夠用,唔會覺得唔夠力。

Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Chery Tiggo 9 嘅安全評級係 TBD,主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面,兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Chery Tiggo 9 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有些差異,如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話,可以仔細對比吓兩者嘅功能列表。

Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo 9 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Chery 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受,建議試駕對比。

總括嚟講,Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 9 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛,關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再嚟試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

Di dalam pasaran SUV Malaysia, ramai pembeli membandingkan Proton X70 dan Honda WR-V ketika memilih kereta. Kedua-dua model ini berada pada harga dan target pasaran yang hampir sama, hari ini kita akan buat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek, membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat riset.
Harga OTR Proton X70 di Malaysia ialah RM 106,800 - 122,300, terdapat sejumlah 3 versi, termasuk 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Honda WR-V di Malaysia ialah RM 89,900 - 107,900, terdapat sejumlah 4 versi, termasuk 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900) dan lain-lain.
Daripada segi harga, harga permulaan Honda WR-V lebih murah RM 16,900 berbanding Proton X70. Jujurnya, dalam julat harga ini, perbezaan beribu ringgit sebenarnya tidak besar, yang penting lihat pada nisbah nilai keseluruhan dan kos penggunaan jangka panjang.

Proton X70 dilengkapi enjin 1.5L Turbo, kuasa kuda 140 hp. Penggunaan minyak rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Honda WR-V dilengkapi enjin 1.5L 4-cyl, kuasa kuda 105 hp. Penggunaan minyak rasmi 6.0 L/100km.
Dari segi kuasa, enjin 1.5L Turbo Proton X70 mempunyai 35 kuasa kuda lebih berbanding enjin 1.5L 4-cyl Honda WR-V, pecutan pertengahan lebih yakin, terutamanya ketika memotong kenderaan di lebuh raya. Namun, penggunaan minyak Honda WR-V mungkin lebih efisien, perbezaan untuk perjalanan bandar harian tidak akan terlalu besar.

Proton X70 panjang badan 4400 mm, ruang bagasi 400 L.
Honda WR-V panjang badan 4400 mm, ruang bagasi 400 L.
Ukuran kedua-dua kereta hampir sama, ruang dalam kereta tidak berbeza banyak. Kereta dalam kategori ini, kegunaan harian sudah cukup.

Proton X70 waranti 5 tahun/150,000km, selang servis setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Honda WR-V waranti 5 tahun/jarak tanpa had, selang servis setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Secara keseluruhannya, Proton X70 dan Honda WR-V adalah model yang cukup bagus di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih mana satu, yang penting lihat keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Kami sarankan anda membuat kajian, bandingkan lebih banyak tawaran dari kedai kereta, kemudian uji pandu untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa membuat kajian pasti tidak akan salah.

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近,今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細比較,幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300,一共有 4 個版本,包括 1.5T Executive(RM 89,800)、1.5T Premium(RM 101,800)、1.5T Flagship(RM 113,300) 等。
Mitsubishi Xforce 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 109,930 - 119,930,一共有 2 個版本,包括 2026 1.5L Ultimate(RM 119,930)、2026 1.5L Urban(RM 109,930) 等。
從價錢睇落,Proton X50 嘅起步價的確比 Mitsubishi Xforce 平咗 RM 20,130。如果你預算有限,Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意,平嗰幾千蚊,可能喺配備上會有取舍,具體要睇你嘅需求。

Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Mitsubishi Xforce 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 MI-PILOT。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣,喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算俾得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都不差,唔使太擔心呢一點。

Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm,行李箱 400 L。
Mitsubishi Xforce 車身長 4400 mm,行李箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣,車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車,日常使用完全夠用。

Proton X50 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇,適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價,可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款;如果你更在意性價比同配備,那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最尾都係建議兩款都去試駕,親身體驗先係最重要。

總之嚟講,Proton X50 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊架車,關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Kia Sportage when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help save you time doing research.
The Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 variants, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The Kia Sportage OTR price in Malaysia is RM 129,639 - 179,320, with a total of 4 variants, including 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High (RM 179,320), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High (RM 159,320), 2025 2.0L AT 2WD High (RM 139,639), etc.
From the price perspective, the Proton X50 starting price is indeed RM 39,839 cheaper than the Kia Sportage. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, also note that the lower price of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, specifically depending on your needs.

Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Kia Sportage safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Drive Wise.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive within this class. New car safety is generally good nowadays, no need to worry too much about this point.

Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Kia Sportage warranty 5 years/300,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.

Both Proton X50 and Kia Sportage are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, consider prioritizing the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.

Overall, Proton X50 and Kia Sportage are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will never be wrong.

喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場,好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 馬自達 2 同 福斯 高爾夫嚟做比較。而家我哋從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較,幫你省返做功課嘅時間。

馬自達 2 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 108,670 - 108,670,一共有 1 個版本,包括 1.5L SkyActiv-G(RM 108,670) 等。
福斯 高爾夫 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 186,530 - 186,530,一共有 1 個版本,包括 2026 1.5T R-Line(RM 186,530) 等。
從價錢來看,馬自達 2 嘅起步價確實比 福斯 高爾夫 便宜咗 RM 77,860。如果你預算有限,馬自達嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但也要注意,便宜嘅那幾千塊,可能在配備上會有取捨,具體要看你嘅需求。

馬自達 2 搭載 1.5L Turbo,馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
福斯 高爾夫 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl,馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面,福斯 高爾夫 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 馬自達 2 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開嘅話,兩款車嘅動力都夠用,唔會覺得唔夠力。

馬自達 2 車身長 4400 mm,后备廂 400 L。
福斯 高爾夫 車身長 4400 mm,后备廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣,車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車,日常使用完全夠用。
馬自達 2 同 福斯 高爾夫 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇,適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價,可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款;如果你更在意性價比同配備,那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕,親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總嘅嚟講,馬自達 2 同 福斯 高爾夫 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一部,關鍵仲係睇你個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,先去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

比亞迪已經悄然成為各國公務車之選,此事為真。
就連本土人口只有 50 多萬嘅非洲島國佛得角,政府公務車都已經全面更換為比亞迪汽車;

巴基斯坦採購咗近百輛比亞迪警車,墨西哥、澳洲、匈牙利、奧地利等國都有採購比亞迪汽車作為警務、消防、外事接待等公務使用。
更有巴西總統、泰國總理、烏茲別克斯坦總統、約旦王后等各國高層選擇比亞迪作為自用座駕,覆蓋歐亞非拉澳多個大洲。
喺國內,比亞迪仲係連續多年蟬聯政府採購新能源公務車銷量榜首,今年上半年,市佔率超過 22%。

從沿海到內陸,甚至大西北等氣候、地形變化大嘅區域,同樣能夠見到大批量比亞迪公務車嘅身影,深度用於接待、警務、航天護航、應急處理等工作。
這背後嘅原因,一係比亞迪多年超 2500 億嘅研發費用,打造咗全鏈條全自研嘅供應鏈,有天神之眼、第二代刀片電池、閃充技術、DM-i 技術等獨家技術,而且耐用好用,先至能匹配政府採購嘅高標準。

二係比亞迪覆蓋全球嘅銷售、生產、服務體系不斷加強,上半年銷量達到 214.6 萬輛,其中海外銷量達到 78.94 萬輛,同比增長 68%。
特別喺多國建廠,解決當地嘅就業、工業升級等難題,協同發展,当地政府自然更愿意支持。
比亞迪唔单能全球熱銷,更能打動各國政府公務採購,凸顯強大嘅品牌同技術能力,助力全球綠色環保普及,自然亦能滿足各類消費者嘅需求。

喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場,好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 凌志 LS 同 宝马 M3 做比較。我哋今日從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較,俾你省返做功課嘅時間。


凌志 LS 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 1,250,000 - 1,531,000,總共有 2 個版本,包括 2021 500 Executive Kiriko(RM 1,531,000)、2021 500 Luxury(RM 1,250,000) 等。
宝马 M3 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 847,800 - 847,800,總共有 1 個版本,包括 Standard(RM 847,800) 等。
從價錢嚟睇,宝马 M3 嘅起步價比 凌志 LS 便宜咗 RM 402,200。老實講,喺呢個價位段,幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大,關鍵始終係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。

凌志 LS 配備 3.0L Turbo,馬力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
宝马 M3 配備 3.0L Turbo,馬力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
兩部車用咗同一套動力系統,所以日常行車嘅感覺基本冇分別。油耗方面都幾接近,唔使太糾結呢一點。

凌志 LS 車身長 4400 mm,後尾箱 400 L。
宝马 M3 車身長 4400 mm,後尾箱 400 L。
兩部車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣,車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車,日常使用完全夠用。

凌志 LS 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
宝马 M3 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩部車嘅驅動方式一樣,都係 FWD,日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。

總體嚟講,凌志 LS 同 宝马 M3 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛,關鍵始終係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再去試駕先至做最終決定。買車係件大事,花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

在马来西亚的汽车市场,很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Volkswagen Golf R 和 Mercedes-Benz E-Class PHEV 来做比较。今天我们从多个方面做一个详细的对比,帮你省下做功课的时间。


Volkswagen Golf R 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 338,812 - 338,812,一共有 2 个版本,包括 2026 2.0T Standard(RM 338,812)、DCT(RM 294,800) 等。
Mercedes-Benz E-Class PHEV 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 427,888 - 427,888,一共有 2 个版本,包括 E 200 Avantgarde(RM 350,000)、E 300 AMG Line(RM 400,000) 等。
从价钱来看,Volkswagen Golf R 的起步价确实比 Mercedes-Benz E-Class PHEV 便宜了 RM 89,076。如果你预算有限,Volkswagen 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意,便宜的那几千块,可能在配备上会有取舍,具体要看你的需求。

Volkswagen Golf R 车身长 4400 mm,后备箱 400 L。
Mercedes-Benz E-Class PHEV 车身长 4400 mm,后备箱 400 L。
两款车的尺寸几乎一样,车内空间差别不大。这个级别的车,日常使用完全够用。

Volkswagen Golf R 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Mercedes-Benz E-Class PHEV 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
两款车的驱动方式一样,都是 FWD,日常驾驶感受不会有太大区别。

Volkswagen Golf R 和 Mercedes-Benz E-Class PHEV 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择,适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价,可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款;如果你更在意性价比和配备,那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾,亲身体验才是最重要的。

总的来说,Volkswagen Golf R 和 Mercedes-Benz E-Class PHEV 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆,关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课,多比较几间车行的报价,再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事,花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
