Homelifestyle
Search History
Popular Searches
Dealer Login / Sign Up
Di pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli akan membandingkan Proton X70 dan Kia Sportage apabila memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kereta ini agak hampir dari segi harga dan pelantarannya, hari ini kami akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat penelitian.
Harga OTR Proton X70 di Malaysia adalah RM 106,800 - 122,300, terdapat 3 varian, termasuk 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Kia Sportage di Malaysia adalah RM 129,639 - 179,320, terdapat 4 varian, termasuk 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High (RM 179,320), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High (RM 159,320), 2025 2.0L AT 2WD High (RM 139,639) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X70 memang lebih murah RM 22,839 berbanding Kia Sportage. Jika bajet anda terhad, varian permulaan Proton sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Namun perlu diingat, ribuan ringgit yang lebih murah itu, mungkin ada kompromi dari segi peralatan, bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Proton X70 dilengkapi 1.5L Turbo, kuasa 140 hp. Penggunaan bahan api rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Kia Sportage dilengkapi 1.5L Turbo, kuasa 140 hp. Penggunaan bahan api rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Kedua-dua kereta menggunakan sistem pemacu yang sama, pengalaman memandu harian hampir tiada perbezaan. Dari segi penggunaan bahan api pun hampir sama, tidak perlu terlalu bimbang tentang ini.
Proton X70 panjang badan 4400 mm, ruang belakang 400 L.
Kia Sportage panjang badan 4400 mm, ruang belakang 400 L.
Saiz kedua-dua kereta hampir sama, ruang dalaman perbezaannya tidak banyak. Kereta darjat ini, penggunaan harian sudah cukup.
Proton X70 waranti 5 tahun/150,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Kia Sportage waranti 5 tahun/300,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Secara keseluruhannya, Proton X70 dan Kia Sportage adalah model kereta yang bagus di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana, terukinya bergantung pada keperluan peribadi dan bajet anda. Kami sarankan anda membuat penelitian yang baik, bandingkan harga di lebih banyak kedai kereta, kemudian buat ujian memandu untuk keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa membuat penelitian tidak akan salah.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿寶騰 X70 同速霸陸 Crosstrek 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都蠻接近嘅，今天我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
速霸陸 Crosstrek 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 145,000 - 160,000，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2.0L e-Boxer（RM 150,000） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，寶騰 X70 嘅起步價確實比速霸陸 Crosstrek 便宜咗 RM 38,200。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都係要注意，便宜嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
寶騰 X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
速霸陸 Crosstrek 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 EyeSight。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過寶騰 X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同速霸陸 Crosstrek 嘅 EyeSight 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比一下兩者嘅功能列表。
寶騰 X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
速霸陸 Crosstrek 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。
寶騰 X70 同速霸陸 Crosstrek 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更喺意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最緊要嘅。
總嘅嚟講，寶騰 X70 同速霸陸 Crosstrek 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。揸車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Mitsubishi Xforce when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
Proton X70 has an OTR price of RM 106,800 - 122,300 in Malaysia, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Mitsubishi Xforce has an OTR price of RM 109,930 - 119,930 in Malaysia, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Ultimate (RM 119,930), 2026 1.5L Urban (RM 109,930), etc.
From a pricing perspective, the starting price of the Proton X70 is indeed RM 3,130 cheaper than the Mitsubishi Xforce. If your budget is limited, the entry-level version of Proton is enough to meet daily needs. However, keep in mind, that few thousand savings might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X70 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mitsubishi Xforce safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include MI-PILOT.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are considered quite comprehensive in this segment. New cars nowadays generally have good safety performance, so no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X70 uses FWD drive mode.
Mitsubishi Xforce uses FWD drive mode.
The drive modes of both cars are the same, both are FWD, so there won't be a big difference in the daily driving experience.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mitsubishi Xforce warranty 3 years/100,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, the Proton X70 and Mitsubishi Xforce are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and then going for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major decision, taking some time to research will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and MG MG HS when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300) etc.
The MG MG HS's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 130,450 - 146,450, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L Standard (RM 105,000), 1.5L Executive (RM 115,000) etc.
From a pricing perspective, the Proton X70's entry price is indeed RM 23,650 cheaper than the MG MG HS. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level model can already meet daily needs. However, be aware that the few thousand saved might involve compromises in features, depending on your specific requirements.
The Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The MG MG HS's safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
In terms of safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, the ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) on Proton X70 and Basic on MG MG HS have some functional differences. If you value active safety, you can carefully compare the feature lists of both.
The Proton X70 uses FWD drive.
The MG MG HS uses FWD drive.
Both cars have the same drive method, both are FWD, so there won't be much difference in the daily driving experience.
Proton X70 comes with a 5-year/150,000km warranty, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
MG MG HS comes with a 7-year/150,000km warranty, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X70 and MG MG HS are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, we recommend test-driving both, the first-hand experience is the most important.
In general, Proton X70 and MG MG HS are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will never be wrong.
Recently, South Korean automaker KG Mobility (KGM) announced a strategic investment agreement with Chery Automobile. According to the agreement, Chery will invest 75 million US dollars into KGM and carry out or expand cooperation in areas such as accelerating new vehicle development, autonomous driving, and advanced electronic and electrical architecture.
If the transaction is completed and all bonds are converted to equity, Chery is expected to hold approximately 10% of KGM's shares and is expected to become its second-largest shareholder.
Chery's partnership with a South Korean automaker this time easily brings to mind the recent cooperation between Geely and Ford. Geely acquired 34% equity in the joint venture for 221 million euros and shares Ford's factory resources located in Valencia, Spain.
On the surface, in both collaborations, Chinese enterprises did not obtain absolute controlling equity, nor did they directly control daily operation management, but this precisely embodies the strategic wisdom of China's deep cultivation in the global market.
In the past, Chinese automakers going global relied more on product exports; however, nowadays, with changing competitive environments, Chinese automobiles are moving from pure "product output" to "global operation" covering technology, supply chain, manufacturing capabilities, brand value, and industrial ecosystems. For Chinese automakers, carrying out deep cooperation with local enterprises can faster utilize existing manufacturing, channels, and industrial resources to enter overseas markets with lower cost thresholds and achieve long-term rooting.
Currently, the globalization of Chinese automakers is entering a brand new stage. According to data from the General Administration of Customs, China's auto exports reached 5.31 million units in the first half of this year, a year-on-year increase of 53%, achieving continuous growth for 5 years. At the same time, consulting firms predict that China's auto export volume in 2026 will approach 10 million units, and China is expected to become the first country in the world to break through the 10 million unit auto export scale.
However, it needs to be seen that export volume growth does not equal the formation of globalization capabilities. For Chinese automakers, going global still faces multiple challenges such as trade barriers, policy differences, local operations, and brand awareness. How to move from "selling out" to "staying in" is the proposition that must be answered in the next stage.
True globalization still requires automakers to answer three core questions: Why are locals willing to accept the enterprise staying? Why are partners willing to walk alongside the enterprise for the long term? Can the enterprise achieve sustainable profitability locally?
These three questions correspond to industrial value, cooperation value, and commercial value respectively. Only when the three form a closed loop does going global become not just a short-term sales growth, but a long-term business capable of crossing cycles and continuously creating value.
"Behind the 'Global Expansion Fever', Chinese Automakers Still Need to Find Long-term Growth Solutions"
In recent years, "going global" has become a mandatory course that Chinese automakers cannot bypass. Besides Chery, enterprises such as Geely, Changan, Leapmotor, and Xpeng are also accelerating the promotion of global layout.
On the surface, this is a natural spillover after the improvement of Chinese automobile technology, product strength, and complete industrial chain capabilities; but from a more realistic perspective, it is also a strategic choice forced by market competition.
In the past few years, China's new energy vehicle market grew rapidly, with new brands, new models, and a large amount of capacity flooding in, and market competition gradually moved from incremental competition to stock game phase. Against the backdrop of domestic market "involution to death", many automakers face the dilemma of "increasing revenue but not profit". Therefore, the overseas market has become an important direction for enterprises to digest capacity, expand scale, and improve profit space.
However, when more and more enterprises regard going global as the answer for growth, a new question also appears: Will the overseas market become the next competitive red sea?
From the demand side, the global new energy vehicle market indeed still exists a large growth space. In the first half of 2026, the cumulative sales of new energy vehicles in the European market were about 2.378 million units, a year-on-year increase of 32.7%, penetration rate reached 29.2%, an increase of about 6 percentage points compared to the same period last year, accounting for 20.3% of global new energy vehicle sales. At the same time, new energy sales in emerging markets such as India and the Philippines also grew rapidly, among which India increased by 83.8% year-on-year, and the Philippines increased by 149.6% year-on-year.
However, it needs to be seen that different countries exist huge differences in consumption habits, regulatory standards, infrastructure, channel systems, and brand awareness, etc. The overseas market is not simply copying the Chinese market's "second battlefield", nor is it as simple as moving domestic mature models overseas for sales.
In fact, the export growth in the first half of this year not only comes from the improvement of the competitiveness of Chinese automakers themselves, but is also affected by multiple factors such as changes in international energy prices and adjustment of the electrification rhythm of overseas traditional automakers. With more Chinese brands entering the overseas market, competition is also gradually upgrading, and the dividends of going global are also gradually decreasing.
If enterprises only rely on price advantages, short-term sales, and channel deployment for expansion, then Chinese automobiles overseas may also fall into the cycle of "low-price competition" and "scale involution".
"Overseas is not a 'Safe Haven', Chinese Automakers Welcome Higher Cost Battlefields"
As is well known, the selling price of many Chinese automobile brands in the overseas market is often higher than the domestic market. Taking Chery Tiggo 8 as an example, the market price in China is around 100,000 yuan, but after entering the Russian market, the starting price is converted to about 220,000 yuan RMB, and in some markets in the Middle East, the landed price of the top configuration model is even close to 400,000 yuan.
This also makes many people in the past believe: going global means "China production, overseas sales", utilizing China's mature supply chain system and cost advantages to obtain higher premiums in the overseas market. But in fact, as Chinese automakers' globalization enters the deep water zone, this simple sales model is facing more and more challenges.
Even, a higher overseas selling price does not necessarily mean higher overseas profits. And a series of factors such as tariff barriers, local production requirements, environmental policies, distribution networks, after-sales service, etc., will directly affect the enterprise's final profitability.
Especially against the background of intensified competition in the global automobile industry, the overseas market is raising entry barriers. For example, the EU "Industrial Accelerator Act" proposes to implement "conditional market access" for countries with global key industry manufacturing capacity share exceeding 40%; the EU "New Battery Act" stipulates that starting from February 2027, power batteries must provide full life cycle carbon footprint data.
At the same time, European local automakers are also strengthening defense. Volkswagen, Stellantis, Renault and other European automotive enterprises have called for the EU to take more measures to protect the local electric vehicle industry; some European enterprises and unions also have concerns about cooperating with Chinese automakers, and even some overseas media described Chinese new energy vehicles as "Trojan horses".
It can be seen that Chinese automobile going global is experiencing a change in underlying logic, the past relied on product quality-price ratio, the future competes on system capabilities. Whoever can transform complex costs in global operations into brand, technology and industrial chain advantages, can truly realize the leap from "exporting products" to "global operations".
"Going Global is Not a Zero-Sum Game, But a Competitive Cooperation Game"
Chinese automakers' going global has never been standing on the opposite side of overseas enterprises.
Previously, Chairman Yin Tongyue of Chery Automobile Co., Ltd. pointed out: "Going to a (emerging) market is not just about pushing Chinese products out, must comply with local regulations, fit local user habits, at the same time we cannot keep all for themselves." He further emphasized that Chery going global is not to "grab" others' territory. "Do not be a plunderer, but be a fertilizer provider, increase fertility; do not go to their (place) to plunder markets, plunder talent."
Because true sustainable globalization is not about selling a car to the overseas market, but forming industrial connections locally, truly rooting in the local market.
Nowadays, the overseas layout methods of Chinese automakers have become more and more diversified, covering whole vehicle exports, CKD assembly, local production, dealer cooperation, technology licensing, platform output, capital cooperation, and joint operation and other models. And different models are essentially all for improving the enterprise's adaptability to the global market.
For example, SAIC-GM-Wuling planned production bases in Indonesia through the industrial chain synergy mode, built 120,000 units of whole vehicle capacity, while leading 16 domestic three-electric enterprises to go out together, and cultivated more than 100 local suppliers, achieving transition from product entry to industrial chain integration; Great Wall Motors through acquiring and transforming Brazil Daimler factory, officially started production in August 2025, created about 2,000 direct employment positions, and drove local supply chain system development; Chery and Spain EV MOTORS established a joint venture company, took over the Nissan closed Barcelona factory, with "Chery Technology + EBRO Brand" method to re-activate local manufacturing capability
In addition, Changan Thailand Rayong Factory welcomed the 20,000th whole vehicle off the line in June 2026, the factory total investment about 2.2 billion yuan, phase one annual capacity 100,000 units, key quality control workstation automation rate reached 90%; Geely relied on Proton brand deep plowing in Malaysia market, its Tanjung Malim electric vehicle factory has started production, phase one annual capacity reached 20,000 units.
It is worth noting that new power brands are also accelerating the output of technical systems and infrastructure capabilities. For example, Nio has deployed 93 battery swap stations overseas, and participated in research and formulation of Singapore electric vehicle charging and swapping standards "Singapore Standard SS 722"; Leapmotor, through establishing a joint venture company with Stellantis, promotes internationalization with the help of global channel resources, its main model C10 has also started local assembly production at Kulim Factory, Kedah, Malaysia; Xpeng not only has strategic cooperation with Volkswagen, but also acquired 90.1% equity of Indonesian listed company EIDO, planning its first overseas production base, and adopted CKD model to promote localized manufacturing.
From the perspective of industry insiders, different going global paths do not exist absolute superiority or inferiority, the key lies in whether it matches the enterprise's own capabilities and development stages. Whole vehicle export speed is fast, investment is relatively light, but easy to be affected by trade policy changes; local factory construction can enhance industrial integration, but needs continuous capital investment and scale support; channel cooperation can quickly open the market, but user relationships and brand assets may be constrained by partners; technology licensing and capital cooperation are lighter, but test whether the enterprise can transform technical advantages into long-term commercial value.
And judging whether an enterprise's going global is successful, cannot look only at export volume, how many countries and regions entered, or even cannot look only at overseas sales growth, but need to see whether it can answer several more core questions.
First, can it make money. Whether overseas business can form stable and sustainable profit-making ability, rather than relying on domestic market blood transfusion, financing support or short-term price advantages.
Secondly, can it take root. Whether it establishes local R&D, manufacturing, channel, service and supply chain systems, rather than staying at one-time product sales.
Thirdly, can it achieve win-win. Whether it can create employment, tax and industrial value for the locality, making government, partners, suppliers and consumers all become beneficiaries in the globalization process.
In addition, it also needs to see if the enterprise can resist risks. Facing tariff changes, policy adjustments, exchange rate fluctuations and geopolitical uncertainties, whether overseas business has sufficient resilience.
More importantly, whether the enterprise can build true brand value. What consumers buy, is it just a lower price Chinese automobile product, or recognize a global automobile brand that can exist for a long time and continuously provide value.
From the perspective of industry insiders, the highest standard of going global is not how much Chinese automakers took away from the overseas market, but how much value was left for the local while obtaining commercial returns. The overseas market does not reject Chinese automobiles, but no market will long-term welcome an "outsider" who only sells products, fights for share, but does not bear industrial responsibility and does not create local value.
Truly viable globalization is not a short-term surprise battle won relying on cost advantages, but finding the greatest common divisor of enterprise interests and local interests in different markets. Only from "entering overseas market" to "integrating into local industry", Chinese automobiles can truly complete the transformation from export powerhouse to important participant in the global automobile industry.
8月4日，德国大陆集团发布2026年二季度财报。随着旗下康迪泰克出售交易敲定，大陆集团长达数年的大规模战略重组步入尾声，正式蜕变为一家“纯轮胎制造商”。得益于果断的业务剥离与聚焦，公司轮胎主业交出了一份盈利大增的亮眼答卷。
利润大涨35.1%，轮胎板块成绝对引擎
财报显示，受2月初出售原厂配套解决方案（OESL）业务影响，大陆集团二季度整体销售额下降9.1%至44亿欧元；但剔除资产剥离扰动，内生营收仅微降0.3%。利润端表现强势，集团调整后息税前利润（EBIT）同比大涨35.1%至5.70亿欧元，利润率从上年同期的9.6%跃升至12.9%。调整后自由现金流由去年同期的-0.46亿欧元成功转正，达到2.16亿欧元。
核心业绩的飙升得益于轮胎业务的强力支撑。二季度，大陆轮胎业务销售额达33亿欧元，调整后EBIT利润率从12.1%大幅提升至15.3%，显著超出13.0%–14.5%的全年指引区间。盈利大增主要归功于18英寸及以上大尺寸轮胎销售占比提升、原材料价格利好、汇率与关税负面影响减弱及严格的成本控制。同时，集团在全球持续加码轮胎产能与绿色能源，包括在美国投资7600万美元建设自动化成品仓、在泰国注资超3亿欧元新增300万条年产能，并在德国自建首座风电场覆盖厂区用电。
剥离康迪泰克，终结“大而全”模式
与高毛利的轮胎业务形成鲜明对比的是，工业橡塑板块康迪泰克受市场复苏慢于预期拖累，二季度营收下滑29.5%至11亿欧元，利润率降至6.9%。早在7月初，大陆已官宣以40亿欧元（另设最高2.5亿欧元业绩分成）将其出售给私募机构孤星基金，预计年底前完成交割。此后，康迪泰克将作为终止经营单独列报。
此次出售是大陆集团完整业务剥离方案的最后一步。自2018年起，大陆集团先后剥离动力总成（纬湃科技）、分拆汽车子集团（Aumovio欧摩威上市）、出售OESL业务，直至如今整体出售康迪泰克。悬殊的盈利差距是持续“断舍离”的核心逻辑：2024年轮胎板块利润率达13.7%，而汽车子集团仅2.3%。通过剥离低效资产，大陆集团将获得约31亿欧元现金流入，其中约25亿欧元将用于派发特别股息或股份回购。
大陆集团CEO表示，出售康迪泰克开启了集团作为纯轮胎专业制造商的全新阶段。未来，大陆将依托全球19家轮胎工厂，深耕乘用车高端超高性能轮胎及商用车胎领域。在全球零部件巨头集体告别“大而全”模式的背景下，大陆集团的果断重组，为谋求从规模走向质量的企业提供了成功范本。
Dalam pasaran SUV di Malaysia, banyak pembeli membandingkan Proton X70 dan Hyundai Tucson apabila memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kereta ini dalam aspek harga dan penempatannya agak hampir, hari ini kita akan buat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek, membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat persiapan.
Harga OTR Proton X70 di Malaysia ialah RM 106,800 - 122,300, mempunyai 3 versi, termasuk 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Hyundai Tucson di Malaysia ialah RM 143,888 - 197,888, mempunyai 5 versi, termasuk 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige (RM 197,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige (RM 186,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime (RM 164,888) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X70 memang lebih murah RM 37,088 berbanding Hyundai Tucson. Jika bajet anda terhad, versi permulaan Proton sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Tetapi anda juga perlu ambil perhatian, beberapa ribu ringgit yang lebih murah itu, mungkin ada kompromi dari segi kelengkapan, bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Penarafan keselamatan Proton X70 ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Penarafan keselamatan Hyundai Tucson ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk SmartSense.
Kedua-dua kereta ini mempunyai penarafan keselamatan yang sama, kelengkapan keselamatan dalam kelas ini sudah cukup lengkap. Keselamatan kereta baharu sekarang tidak buruk, tidak perlu terlalu risau mengenai perkara ini.
Proton X70 menggunakan cara pemacu FWD.
Hyundai Tucson menggunakan cara pemacu FWD.
Kedua-dua kereta ini mempunyai cara pemacu yang sama, iaitu FWD, pengalaman memandu harian tidak akan berbeza banyak.
Proton X70 dan Hyundai Tucson kedua-duanya adalah pilihan utama pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga dan perjalanan harian. Jika anda lebih mementingkan reputasi jenama dan harga jualan semula, anda boleh memprioritaskan yang mempunyai reputasi lebih baik; jika anda lebih mengutamakan nilai wang dan kelengkapan, maka pilih yang mempunyai konfigurasi lebih kaya. Akhir sekali, disyaratkan kedua-dua model untuk diuji pusing, pengalaman peribadi adalah yang paling penting.
Secara keseluruhan, Proton X70 dan Hyundai Tucson kedua-duanya adalah model kereta yang cukup baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih mana satu, kuncinya adalah melihat keperluan peribadi dan bajet anda. Kami menyarankan anda membuat persiapan terlebih dahulu, membandingkan beberapa tawaran daripada pelbagai dealer kereta, kemudian pergi uji pusing untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah urusan besar, menghabiskan sedikit masa membuat persiapan pasti tidak salah.
1958 年，全中國汽車產量唔到兩萬輛。
嗰一年，上海汽車裝配廠嘅工人敲咗第一架鳳凰牌轎車。車身靠手工捶打成型，翼子板同車頂嘅弧線，係一錘一錘敲出嚟嘅。冇人知，七十一年後，呢間弄堂入面嘅工廠會將第一億輛車交到用戶手中。
一億輛。呢個數字放喺全球，亦僅有豐田、大眾、通用等少數巨頭跨過。
由兩萬到一億，中國汽車工業行咗七十一年。上汽係呢條路上行得好最遠、最穩嗰一個。但佢冇停——一億輛之後僅兩個月，佢又交出咗 1-7 月 238.4 萬輛嘅成績單，繼續領跑中國車市。
由「一億輛」嘅歷史厚度，到「238.4 萬輛」嘅現實速度——上汽用一組數字，寫咗自己下半程嘅開篇。舟渡山海，新局已開。
一億輛，一個產業嘅成年禮
1983 年，第一架桑塔納喺上海下線。國產化率 2.7%，能配套嘅只有五樣嘢：輪胎、收音機、喇叭、天線、標牌——一隻手數得過。此後嘅十年，上汽帶住國內零部件企業一個零件一個零件地啃，國產化率最終突破 80%。嗰係中國第一次擁有真正意義上嘅現代化汽車零部件體系。
此後，1997 年上海通用 23 個月建廠出車，中國速度被寫入全球汽車工業嘅坐標系；2006 年榮威品牌誕生，自主品牌第一次有咗自己嘅名；2016 年全球首款互聯網汽車榮威 RX5 問世，汽車第一次有咗「思考」嘅能力。
七十年間，上汽嘅每一次跨越都同中國汽車工業嘅躍遷同步——由「能不能造出車」到「能不能造好車」再到「能不能定義車」，行得唔算快，但每一步都算數。駛過七十年嘅浪同沙，船頭已轉向下一片海域。
238.4 萬輛，逆勢當中嘅生長
2026 年嘅中國車市，當絕大多數车企都面臨住規模縮減嘅挑戰時，上汽交出嘅答卷係，1-7 月銷售 238.4 萬輛，穩步領跑。
數字背後係結構嘅變化。自主品牌佔比 72.4%，每賣出三架車，超過兩架來自自主陣營。「市場換技術」嘅課題有咗新嘅答案——技術唔單止換來咗，仲長咗出自己嘅根系。上汽乘用車、智己、大通、五菱，五個自主板塊各自喺細分市場扎根生長，由低到高形成咗一條完整嘅防線。
新能源正在改寫呢間企業嘅動力結構。1-7 月 97.3 萬輛嘅銷量，27.4% 嘅增速，遠超行業平均。呢個數字背後係 MG4 家族單月交車超 1.7 萬輛嘅持續熱度，係尚界 Z7/Z7T 兩個多月交付破 2 萬輛嘅市場節奏，係 MG07 預售 20 小時訂單破 21000 輛嘅爆發力。合資端同樣在發力——大眾 ID. ERA 9X 躋身增程大型 SUV 第一梯隊，奧迪 E7X 上車兩個月交付超 7000 輛。
由 A0 級到中大型 SUV，由代步到豪華，上汽嘅新能源版圖正覆蓋住每一個角落。新能源唔再係趨勢，而係日常。7 月，五菱星光 L、智己 LS9 Hyper、MG07 接連落地，節奏冇斷。
海外，由產品到主場
1-7 月海外累計銷售 87.6 萬輛，同比增長 52.1%。喺歐盟加徵關稅嘅背景下，上汽嘅選擇係將根紮落去——法蘭克福歐洲工程中心專注本地化研發，泰國、印尼、印度三大基地支撐區域供應，42 艘滾裝船保障全球運力。
7 月，MG 將技術大會開到咗倫敦。Plug-in Hybrid+ 混合動力系統、SolidCore 固態/半固態電池、MG Parking 智慧座艙——三項核心技術集中亮相，系統化打造「Hybrid+ 混合動力」、「SolidCore 固態/半固態電池」、「i-SMART 智能行車」三大全球技術標籤。同月，MG 登陸古德伍德速度節，MG Go！同 Cyber Concept 兩款概念車全球首秀。
由技術大會到古德伍德，MG 釋放嘅訊號比新車發布更重要：銷量擴張之後，品牌進入下一個階段——由「產品出海」升級為「技術主場」。喺歐洲，MG 品牌 1-7 月累計銷售 21.8 萬輛，蟬聯中國品牌歐洲銷冠。截至 7 月，海外累計銷量突破 700 萬輛。呢條出海路行咗好多年，每一步都喺將「中國製造」變成「中國認知」。
自主、新能源、海外三駕馬車同時發力——上汽嘅增長引擎從合資「單核」切換為「多核」驅動。《財富》世界 500 強排名第 125 位，較去年上升 13 位。
合資，正喺被重新定義
中國汽車合資四十余年，固定劇本從未改變：外方出技術，中方出市場。上汽正喺改寫呢個劇本。
上汽大眾 ID. ERA 9X，由中方團隊主導產品定義，搭載上汽自研嘅增程系統同雲棲智能座艙——呢唔係「導入德系車」，係「定義德系車」。2026 年全年，上汽大眾計劃投放 7 款新能源產品，覆蓋增程、插混、純電三大技術路線。
奧迪走得更遠。今年 4 月，奧迪同上汽簽署戰略合作協議，計劃喺上海設立奧迪創新技術中心——奧迪喺歐洲之外嘅第一個「全價值鏈」研發實體，由車型平台開始完全獨立研發。奧迪放棄「全球車」戰略，轉向「喺當地、為當地」。
上汽通用亦喺轉型。今年 3 月公布三年戰略規劃，未來三年每年推出十幾款新車。1-7 月上汽通用新能源車銷售 6.2 萬輛，同比增長 75.2%。
由桑塔納國產化率 2.7% 起步，到如今上汽向合資品牌輸出核心技術——呢條由學習到追趕再到主導嘅路徑，行咗一代人嘅時間。「合資」二字嘅內涵，正喺被重新定義。新局，正係從舊嘅邊界被打破時開始嘅。
技術，唔懸喺高處
近十年，上汽喺電動化、智能化領域累計投入近 1900 億元，擁有超 24000 項有效專利。但呢些數字嘅真正意義，喺佢哋正喺由實驗室走向普通人嘅車庫。
6 萬級嘅榮威 i6 全系標配 8155 芯片同豆包智能座艙，9 萬級嘅 MG4X 率先將半固態電池同後驅五连杆獨立懸架帶入呢一價格帶，30 萬以內嘅 SUV 標配線控轉向同後輪轉向——一台 5 米長嘅車轉彎比 A0 級小車仲靈活。7 月，智己 LS9 Hyper 率先落地線控轉向國標，MG07 則將 800V+5C 快充帶入 12 萬級市場。
行業通用嘅玩法，係用配置劃分用戶——想要好嘅體驗，就得花多啲錢。上汽做嘅係另一件事：將前沿技術變成不同價位用戶嘅標配。
用規模化攤薄研發成本，用成本優勢拉寬用戶覆蓋，用訂單規模反哺下一代技術。正向循環一旦建立，技術就唔再係參數表上嘅數字，而係每一個普通車主每日都能感受到嘅日常。
結語：
由 1958 年嘅鳳凰牌，到 2026 年嘅一億輛；由弄堂入面嘅榔頭，到法蘭克福嘅技術中心、倫敦嘅技術大會、古德伍德嘅速度節。呢條路行咗七十一年，唔算快，但每一步都在改變中國汽車工業嘅邊界。
一億輛唔係終點。喺呢個台階上，上汽需要回答嘅問題已經唔係「能不能造出車」，而係「如何定義下一個時代嘅出行」。強山海已渡，新局已開，下一程正喺腳下。
呢條路上嘅每一步，都關係住無數人嘅出行日常。一億輛，唔係用來回望嘅，係用來出發嘅。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Ativa and Toyota Yaris Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, let's make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Perodua Ativa in Malaysia is RM 62,500 - 73,400, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400), etc.
The OTR price of Toyota Yaris Cross in Malaysia is RM 99,900 - 109,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Standard (RM 99,900), 2026 HEV 1.5L Standard (RM 109,900), etc.
From a price perspective, Perodua Ativa's starting price is indeed RM 37,400 cheaper than Toyota Yaris Cross. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, also note that the savings of a few thousand Ringgit might involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Perodua Ativa is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Toyota Yaris Cross is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, the driving experience is basically the same in daily use. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to dwell too much on this point.
Perodua Ativa body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Toyota Yaris Cross body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, the interior space is not much different. For this class of cars, daily use is completely sufficient.
Perodua Ativa uses FWD drive system.
Toyota Yaris Cross uses FWD drive system.
Both cars have the same drive system, both are FWD, the daily driving experience will not have much difference.
Perodua Ativa and Toyota Yaris Cross are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Ativa and Toyota Yaris Cross are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, comparing quotes from a few car dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing homework will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Perodua Ativa 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細對比，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Ativa 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 62,500 - 73,400，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.0L Turbo X（RM 62,500）、1.0L Turbo H（RM 67,300）、1.0L Turbo AV（RM 73,400）等。
Chery Tiggo Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 88,750 - 99,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH（RM 99,750）、2025 1.5T Standard（RM 88,750）等。
由價錢睇，Perodua Ativa 嘅入門口價確實比 Chery Tiggo Cross 平咗 RM 26,250。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都需要注意，平幾千蚊，可能在配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Perodua Ativa 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA。
Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Perodua Ativa 嘅 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
Perodua Ativa 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
Chery Tiggo Cross 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Perodua Ativa 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。
總括嚟講，Perodua Ativa 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建议大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
Pada pasaran SUV di Malaysia, banyak pembeli membandingkan Proton X70 dan Mitsubishi Xforce apabila memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kereta ini mempunyai harga dan kedudukan pasaran yang agak serupa, hari ini kita akan buat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa melakukan persediaan.
Proton X70 mempunyai harga OTR di Malaysia RM 106,800 - 122,300, terdapat 3 versi, termasuk 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300) dan lain-lain.
Mitsubishi Xforce mempunyai harga OTR di Malaysia RM 109,930 - 119,930, terdapat 2 versi, termasuk 2026 1.5L Ultimate (RM 119,930), 2026 1.5L Urban (RM 109,930) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X70 memang lebih murah RM 3,130 berbanding Mitsubishi Xforce. Jika bajet anda terhad, versi permulaan Proton sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Tetapi perlu diingat, ribuan ringgit yang lebih murah itu mungkin melibatkan pertukaran pada kelengkapan, bergantung kepada keperluan anda.
Proton X70 dilengkapi enjin 1.5L Turbo, kuasa 140 hp. Penggunaan minyak rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Mitsubishi Xforce dilengkapi enjin 1.5L Turbo, kuasa 140 hp. Penggunaan minyak rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Kedua-dua kereta menggunakan set sistem kuasa yang sama, pengalaman memandu harian pada dasarnya tiada perbezaan. Dari segi penggunaan minyak juga hampir sama, tidak perlu terlalu bimbang mengenai hal ini.
Proton X70 panjang badan 4400 mm, bagasi 400 L.
Mitsubishi Xforce panjang badan 4400 mm, bagasi 400 L.
Saiz kedua-dua kereta hampir sama, ruang dalaman tidak banyak berbeza. Kereta pada tahap ini, penggunaan harian sudah cukup memadai.
Proton X70 waranti 5 tahun/150,000 km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000 km atau 6 bulan.
Mitsubishi Xforce waranti 3 tahun/100,000 km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000 km atau 6 bulan.
Secara keseluruhan, Proton X70 dan Mitsubishi Xforce kedua-duanya adalah model yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih mana satu, kunci utama bergantung kepada keperluan peribadi dan bajet anda. Disyorkan untuk menyiapkan persediaan, bandingkan beberapa tawaran dari dealer kereta, kemudian buat tes drive untuk keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan sedikit masa untuk persediaan pasti tidak salah.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會揀 Perodua Aruz 同 Proton X50 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900）等。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等。
從價錢來看，Perodua Aruz 嘅起步價的確比 Proton X50 平咗 RM 16,900。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Perodua Aruz 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級距入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Perodua Aruz 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾近一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級距嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Perodua Aruz 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X50 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保養條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價錢，建議去車友群問下真實車主嘅經驗。
總體嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Proton X50 都係馬來西亞市場幾不錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
8月4日，广汽集团发布7月产销公告。数据显示，1-7月，广汽集团汽车销量已超88.60万辆，同比增长1.28%，新能源车销量达31.17万辆，同比增长66.20%，节能与新能源车销量占比进一步提升至63.96%。自主品牌出口量累计达14.50万辆，同比增长130%，已超2025年全年水平。
今年7月，广汽集团迎来发展重要里程碑，累计产销量突破3000万辆，迈入规模化发展新阶段。同时，广汽集团也连续14年登上《财富》世界500强榜单。
自主品牌增长强劲
合资品牌稳固基本盘
今年以来，自主品牌保持强劲增长动能，成为广汽集团核心增长引擎。1-7月自主品牌累计销量超过40万辆，同比大增33.31%，其中7月销量超5.42万辆，同比增长19.91%。
昊铂埃安BU 1-7月累计销量达21.04万辆，较去年同期激增62.08%，并在7月继续维持双位数增长势头，销量同比增长36.37%至28,807辆。其中埃安i60月销持续过万；埃安N60上市两个月累计交付已突破1.2万辆，在10-15万级激光雷达智驾纯电SUV细分市场占比达73.3%；昊铂S600同步开启上市交付。此外，埃安产品矩阵于7月再次升级，首发埃安Ray车系，为品牌发展注入全新活力。
昊铂S600
埃安Ray 7
广汽传祺今年以来累计销量已超18.71万辆，同比增长9.83%，其中7月销量达22,739辆。7月，广汽传祺产品阵营迎来双车更新，2027款传祺向往S7 PHEV正式发售，第五代传祺GS4以7.98万元亲民门槛越级登场，满足用户多元购车需求。
传祺向往S7 PHEV
启境汽车是广汽集团与华为乾崑联合打造的高端智能电动车品牌，首款车型启境GT7于6月底正式上市，7月开启用户交付。上市后首月，启境GT7销量达2658辆，收获市场与消费者的认可。提车即享华为乾崑智驾ADS 5、领先的智能化体验、极致的操控表现、卓尔不凡的美学设计，再叠加广汽扎实的品质与安全背书，共同成为打动用户下单的核心因素。渠道端，启境已在全国超90座城市落地近300家门店。伴随启境GT7稳步交付，品牌第二款车型启境GX7也全面提速，年内将正式发布，启境“一境双顶流”产品矩阵逐步成型，品牌正式迈向全新发展阶段。
启境GT7
合资品牌继续依托旗舰车型巩固基本盘。广汽丰田1-7月累计销量已突破40.25万辆，其中7月销量达46,500辆，凯美瑞、汉兰达、赛那三大旗舰车型月销22,843辆，销量占比达49%；铂智系列继续保持月销破万势头，7月销量12,002辆，占比超25%，主力车型铂智3X销量9,546辆，连续多月稳居合资新能源车型销量第一梯队。
广汽丰田铂智系列
广汽本田7月销量11,686辆。《2026上半年中国汽车保值率研究报告》显示，雅阁以55.90%的三年保值率再获合资中型车冠军；皓影以58.19%的三年保值率位居合资紧凑型SUV第二。今年7月，广汽本田累计销量突破1100万辆，同时双方股东签署续约协议，将合作期延长至2038年，共同加速电动化与智能化转型。按照规划，广汽本田未来两年将推出5款新车，包括两款本土化新能源车型和全新迭代的混动产品。
广汽本田皓影
自主品牌海外跑出“加速度”
累计出口破14万辆、同比增130%
出海正在成为广汽的“第一增长曲线”。7月，广汽自主品牌出口量达23,575辆，同比增长119%；1-7月累计出口量14.50万辆，同比增长130%，已超过2025年全年水平。
今年7月广汽在全球五大区域市场，沿着本地化生产、新品投放、政策协同三大维度全面加速拓展。其中美洲市场终端销量同比增长139%，乌拉圭、哥斯达黎加、哥伦比亚、巴西等市场销量均实现同比数倍增长，同时获批加入巴西“绿色移动与创新计划”，深度融入当地国家绿色发展战略；独联体地区终端销量同比增长112%，全球第7家KD工厂在哈萨克斯坦落地，GS8同步下线。
GAC GS8在哈萨克斯坦生产基地下线
在亚太市场，广汽7月终端销量同比增长78%，泰国工厂已累计超万辆整车下线、多款新车登陆菲律宾；在中东及非洲地区，广汽终端销量同比增长51%，7月正式登陆摩洛哥市场，首批将投放三款SUV，覆盖燃油、混动、插混多元动力。与此同时，广汽在欧洲稳步突破。在希腊纯电乘用车市场，广汽市场占有率已提升至7.7% ，位列市场第二，同时多国车型预热筹备上市。
泰国罗勇工厂完成第10000辆整车下线
投资生态见成效
补能网络再提速
广汽集团持续围绕汽车未来发展趋势深化产业链布局，夯实芯片、自动驾驶、具身智能、航空航天等关键领域自主可控根基。今年7月，广汽密集收获多项产业投资成果。
7月27日，广汽于2021年参投的国产DRAM存储芯片企业长鑫科技登陆科创板，创下A股年内、科创板募资最高纪录。同月初，早期投资的碳化硅功率器件制造商基本半导体、自动驾驶技术公司Momenta双双登陆港交所，导航定位芯片制造商禾润电子创业板IPO获受理。
截至目前，广汽已投资包括地平线、粤芯半导体、小马智行、文远知行、清陶能源等超过140家优质企业，累计培育至少48家参投企业上市。
投资布局之外，广汽同步加速补能生态落地配套。截至目前，广汽“9纵10横”补能网络已覆盖全国31省213座城市，实现核心城区“直线1公里必有站”；自营充电桩超2.7万根，其中超充桩已突破2万根；此外，我国电动汽车充电桩3C认证已于8月1日起实施，广汽多款充电桩产品已率先获3C认证，覆盖公共快充、重卡补能、目的地慢充等场景，为新能源车主提供便捷、安全的补能服务。
广汽能源“9纵10横”补能网络
今年下半年，广汽将重磅推出传祺首款硬派越野SUV越7、埃安全新超级纯电轿跑RAY 7、启境GX7等多款车型，以产品升级回应市场期待。在此背后，广汽集团正紧抓汽车产业智能化与全球化机遇，同步推进“稳合资、强自主、拓生态”三大核心任务，加速海外市场开拓与产业链纵深布局，以系统化举措持续夯实未来竞争力。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Ativa and Chery Tiggo Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Ativa's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 62,500 - 73,400, with a total of 3 variants, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400), etc.
Chery Tiggo Cross's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 88,750 - 99,750, with a total of 2 variants, including 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH (RM 99,750), 2025 1.5T Standard (RM 88,750), etc.
From a price perspective, Perodua Ativa's starting price is indeed RM 26,250 cheaper than Chery Tiggo Cross. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, please note that the savings might come with compromises in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Perodua Ativa's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA.
Chery Tiggo Cross's safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
In terms of safety features, both cars received good ratings. However, there are functional differences between Perodua Ativa's ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA and Chery Tiggo Cross's Basic. If you prioritize active safety, you can compare the feature lists of both in detail.
Perodua Ativa uses FWD drive mode.
Chery Tiggo Cross uses FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, FWD, so daily driving experience won't differ much.
Perodua Ativa warranty is 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo Cross warranty is 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Perodua Ativa and Chery Tiggo Cross are both excellent car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do thorough research, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a major decision; spending time on research will never be a mistake.
Dalam pasaran SUV Malaysia, ramai pembeli akan membandingkan Proton X70 dan MG MG HS ketika memilih kereta. Kedua-dua model kereta ini memiliki harga dan kelas yang sangat hampir. Hari ini, kita akan buat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek, untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Harga OTR Proton X70 di Malaysia ialah RM 106,800 - 122,300, terdapat 3 varian, termasuk 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR MG MG HS di Malaysia ialah RM 130,450 - 146,450, terdapat 2 varian, termasuk 1.5L Standard (RM 105,000), 1.5L Executive (RM 115,000) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X70 memang lebih murah RM 23,650 berbanding MG MG HS. Jika bajet anda terhad, varian asas Proton sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Namun, ambil perhatian, selisih harga ribuan ringgit itu mungkin menandakan kompromi pada kelengkapan, bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Penilaian keselamatan Proton X70 adalah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Penilaian keselamatan MG MG HS adalah TBD, sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk Basic.
Dari segi pelengkapan keselamatan, kedua-dua kereta telah mendapat penilaian yang baik. Walau bagaimanapun, ADAS Proton X70 (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) dan Basic MG MG HS mempunyai perbezaan fungsi. Jika anda mengutamakan keselamatan aktif, boleh bandingkan senarai fungsi kedua-duanya dengan teliti.
Proton X70 menggunakan cara pemanduan FWD.
MG MG HS menggunakan cara pemanduan FWD.
Cara pemanduan kedua-dua kereta adalah sama, iaitu FWD, tiada banyak perbezaan dalam pengalaman memandu harian.
Proton X70 dan MG MG HS adalah pilihan popular di pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga dan komuter harian. Jika anda lebih mengutamakan reputasi jenama dan harga jual semula, pilih yang mempunyai reputasi lebih baik; jika anda lebih mementingkan nisbah harga dan kelengkapan, pilih yang mempunyai kelengkapan lebih lengkap. Akhir sekali, disyorkan untuk membuat ujian memandu pada kedua-dua kereta tersebut kerana pengalaman peribadi adalah yang paling penting.
S secara keseluruhan, Proton X70 dan MG MG HS adalah model kereta yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana, ia bergantung pada keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Kami menyarankan agar membuat kajian, membandingkan beberapa tawaran harga di showroom, kemudian melakukan ujian memandu untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara penting, mengambil masa untuk kajian pasti tidak rugi.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拎 Proton X70 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，而家我哋就從多個方面做個詳細比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300）等。
Mitsubishi Xforce 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 109,930 - 119,930，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Ultimate（RM 119,930）、2026 1.5L Urban（RM 109,930）等。
從價錢睇落，Proton X70 嘅起步價確實比 Mitsubishi Xforce 平咗 RM 3,130。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體睇你嘅需求。
Proton X70 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Mitsubishi Xforce 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩款車用咗同一套動力系統，日常行開嘅感覺基本冇分別。油耗方面也差唔多，唔使太執住這一點。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，後廂 400 L。
Mitsubishi Xforce 車身長 4400 mm，後廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mitsubishi Xforce 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。
Proton X70 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更佳嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後始終建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，Proton X70 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再嚟試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysia SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Ativa and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Ativa's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 62,500 - 73,400, with a total of 3 variants, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400), etc.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 123,750 - 123,750, with a total of 2 variants, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 125,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 140,000), etc.
From a price perspective, Perodua Ativa's starting price is indeed RM 61,250 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 7 Pro. If you have a limited budget, Perodua's entry-level model can already meet daily needs. However, keep in mind that the few thousand ringgit savings might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Ativa's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro's safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
In terms of safety features, both cars received good ratings. However, there are some functional differences between Perodua Ativa's ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro's Basic. If you value active safety, you can carefully compare the feature lists of both.
Perodua Ativa uses FWD drive mode.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro uses FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, FWD, so there will not be much difference in daily driving feel.
Perodua Ativa warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Perodua Ativa and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are mainstream choices in the Malaysia market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Perodua Ativa and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are quite good models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a major matter; spending time on research will definitely not be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Ativa and Mitsubishi Xforce when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
Perodua Ativa's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 62,500 - 73,400, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400), etc.
Mitsubishi Xforce's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 109,930 - 119,930, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Ultimate (RM 119,930), 2026 1.5L Urban (RM 109,930), etc.
From a price perspective, Perodua Ativa's starting price is indeed RM 47,430 cheaper than Mitsubishi Xforce. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the few thousand difference might involve compromises in features, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Ativa is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Mitsubishi Xforce is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Mitsubishi Xforce's 1.5L Turbo has 35 hp more than Perodua Ativa's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily driving in the city, both cars have enough power and will not feel underpowered.
Perodua Ativa's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA.
Mitsubishi Xforce's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include MI-PILOT.
Both cars have the same safety rating. Safety features in this class are quite comprehensive. New cars nowadays do not have poor safety, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Perodua Ativa adopts FWD drive mode.
Mitsubishi Xforce adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not differ much.
Overall, Perodua Ativa and Mitsubishi Xforce are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and going for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will never go wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X70 同 GWM Haval H6 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，而家我哋就會從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你慳返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300）等。
GWM Haval H6 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 139,750 - 139,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Turbo Standard（RM 140,000）、1.5L Turbo Premium（RM 155,000）等。
由價錢睇，Proton X70 嘅起步價確實比 GWM Haval H6 平咗 RM 32,950。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經滿足到日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體睇你嘅需要。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
GWM Haval H6 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩部車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 GWM Haval H6 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X70 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
GWM Haval H6 保養 7 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X70 同 GWM Haval H6 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後始終建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，Proton X70 同 GWM Haval H6 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拎 Proton X70 同 Chery Tiggo 9 黎做比較。這兩架車喺價位同定位上都幾接近嘅，今日我哋就由多個方面做個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有一 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300）等等。
Chery Tiggo 9 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 166,800 - 179,800，一共有一個版本，包括 2026 2.0T Standard（RM 179,750）等等。
睇價錢來講，Proton X70 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 9 平咗 RM 60,000。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。不過都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上要有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Chery Tiggo 9 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，這兩架車都攞到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Chery Tiggo 9 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo 9 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩架車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Proton X70 保養保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 9 保養保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X70 同 Chery Tiggo 9 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你比較睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更加在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後都建議兩架車都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總括來講，Proton X70 同 Chery Tiggo 9 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊架，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比下幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
© 2024 Bitauto.com. All Rights Reserved.
Bitauto (www.yiche.com and www.bitauto.com) is one of the most visited automotive websites in China. We provide detailed info on Chinese car brands available in your area. Please note that the information provided on this website is based on publicly available data and is for reference only. It may not be fully updated or accurate at all times.
Help us improve our website
