HomeHonda Civic
Search History
Popular Searches
Dealer Login / Sign Up
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, there are 4 versions in total, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV OTR price in Malaysia is RM 129,750 - 129,750, there are 2 versions in total, including 2025 1.5T 90km CSH (RM 129,750), What charging methods does the Tiggo 7 PHEV support? Can it be charged using a home power socket? (RM 117,478), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 39,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV. If your budget is limited, the Proton entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, please note that the few thousand dollars difference may involve trade-offs in features; it ultimately depends on your needs.
Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
In terms of safety features, both cars received good ratings. However, there are some differences in function between Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV's Basic. If you value active safety more, you can compare the feature lists of both carefully.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use, daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Finally, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, taking time to do research will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers often compare Proton X50 and MG MG HS when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help save you time doing your research.
The OTR selling price of Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR selling price of MG MG HS in Malaysia is RM 130,450 - 146,450, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L Standard (RM 105,000), 1.5L Executive (RM 115,000), etc.
From the price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 40,650 cheaper than MG MG HS. If your budget is limited, the entry-level version of Proton can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand cheaper price may involve trade-offs in equipment, which depends on your specific needs.
The safety rating of Proton X50 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), and the active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of MG MG HS is TBD, and the active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars received good ratings. However, there are some differences in functionality between Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and MG MG HS's Basic. If you value active safety, you can carefully compare their feature lists.
Proton X50 body length is 4400 mm, trunk capacity is 400 L.
MG MG HS body length is 4400 mm, trunk capacity is 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. Cars of this class are more than sufficient for daily use.
Proton X50 warranty is 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval is every 10,000km or 6 months.
MG MG HS warranty is 7 years/150,000km, maintenance interval is every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, both Proton X50 and MG MG HS are very good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research thoroughly, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending time doing research will definitely not be wrong.
Dalam pasaran SUV Malaysia, ramai pembeli membandingkan Proton X50 dan Subaru Crosstrek semasa memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kereta ini mempunyai harga dan posisi yang agak hampir. Hari ini, kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat penyelidikan.
Harga OTR Proton X50 di Malaysia ialah RM 89,800 - 113,300, terdapat 4 varian, termasuk 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Subaru Crosstrek di Malaysia ialah RM 145,000 - 160,000, terdapat 1 varian, termasuk 2.0L e-Boxer (RM 150,000) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X50 memang lebih murah RM 55,200 berbanding Subaru Crosstrek. Jika bajet anda terhad, varian permulaan Proton sudah cukup untuk keperluan harian. Tetapi perlu diingat, perbezaan beberapa ribu itu mungkin ada pengorbanan dari segi kelengkapan, bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Proton X50 dilengkapi enjin 1.5L 4-silinder, kuasa 105 hp. Penggunaan minyak rasmi 6.0 L/100km.
Subaru Crosstrek dilengkapi enjin 1.5L Turbo, kuasa 140 hp. Penggunaan minyak rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Dari segi kuasa, 1.5L Turbo Subaru Crosstrek mempunyai 35 kuasa kuda lebih daripada enjin 1.5L 4-silinder Proton X50. Namun, untuk pemanduan harian di kawasan bandar, kedua-dua kereta ini mempunyai kuasa yang cukup dan tidak akan terasa lemah.
Proton X50 panjang badan 4400 mm, bak muatan 400 L.
Subaru Crosstrek panjang badan 4400 mm, bak muatan 400 L.
Saiz kedua-dua kereta ini hampir sama, ruang dalaman tidak banyak berbeza. Untuk kereta kelas ini, penggunaan harian sudah cukup.
Proton X50 menggunakan sistem penggerak 4WD.
Subaru Crosstrek menggunakan sistem penggerak FWD.
4WD Proton dan FWD Subaru akan memberikan pengalaman memandu yang berbeza, disyorkan untuk ujian pemanduan perbandingan.
Proton X50 dan Subaru Crosstrek adalah pilihan utama di pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga dan perjalanan harian. Jika anda lebih mementingkan reputasi jenama dan harga kedua, anda boleh utamakan yang mempunyai reputasi lebih baik; Jika anda lebih mementingkan nilai kos dan kelengkapan, pilih varian yang lebih kaya. Akhir sekali, disyorkan kedua-dua model untuk ujian pemanduan, pengalaman sendiri adalah yang paling penting.
Secara keseluruhannya, Proton X50 dan Subaru Crosstrek adalah model kereta yang cukup bagus di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana, utama bergantung pada keperluan peribadi dan bajet anda. Kami cadangkan anda membuat penyelidikan, membandingkan beberapa tawaran daripada pusat jualan kereta, kemudian lakukan ujian pemanduan untuk keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa untuk membuat penyelidikan pasti tidak salah.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 GWM Haval H6 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細嘅比較，幫你攞返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
GWM Haval H6 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 139,750 - 139,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Turbo Standard（RM 140,000）、1.5L Turbo Premium（RM 155,000） 等。
由價錢睇落，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 GWM Haval H6 平咗 RM 49,950。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要小心，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
GWM Haval H6 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都攞到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 GWM Haval H6 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲分別，如果你比較鍾意主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
GWM Haval H6 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 GWM 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕比較。
Proton X50 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
GWM Haval H6 保養 7 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X50 同 GWM Haval H6 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配備更豐富嗰款。始終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 GWM Haval H6 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫晒你省返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，合共 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Mitsubishi Xforce 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 109,930 - 119,930，合共 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Ultimate（RM 119,930）、2026 1.5L Urban（RM 109,930） 等。
由價錢睇嚟，Proton X50 嘅起價真係比 Mitsubishi Xforce 平咗 RM 20,130。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Mitsubishi Xforce 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mitsubishi Xforce 保用 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X50 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑好嗰一款；如果你更介意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總括嚟講，Proton X50 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
Unleashing 40 Billion for Buyback
”
Author | Wang Lei
Editor | Qin Zhangyong
Every time CATL releases its financial report, it refreshes industry perception.
In the first half of the year, revenue reached 276.917 billion yuan, nearly 100 billion more than the 178.9 billion yuan of the same period last year. Net profit was 43.284 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 41.98%.
That means daily earnings of 240 million yuan, nearly 10 million earned in an hour.... Last year's same period, King Ning was only earning 170 million a day. A year later, King Ning's money-making ability is still running wild.
In stark contrast, multiple new energy vehicle manufacturers have successively released semi-annual performance forecasts, many facing profitability pressure, which actually has clear economic logic behind it:
From January to May 2026, the automotive industry's profit margin in China was only 3.4%. The vehicle manufacturing segment's profit margin was down to just 1.5%. Power batteries account for 30% to 40% of total vehicle costs, an absolute "major cost factor".
Industry chain profits are visibly concentrating on the battery segment, which is indeed an important source of CATL's profitability. However, if you turn to the details in CATL's financial report, even a strong King Ning cannot remain unaffected in the face of rising raw material prices upstream.
01
Absolute "King Ning"
In the first half of this year, CATL posted the highest first-half revenue in its company history: 276.917 billion yuan. Correspondingly, the second quarter also contributed a quarterly record high of 147.786 billion yuan.
This growth rate is already quite outrageous for CATL's super huge scale.
Net profit attributable to the parent company reached 43.28 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 41.98%; Net profit attributable to parent after deducting non-recurring gains and losses was 39.01 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 43.44%. Daily net earnings were about 240 million yuan in the first half. In the time it takes for others to bend down and pick up money, King Ning has already earned 3,000 yuan.
How is this money earned? CATL has a clear business ledger.
Among them, power batteries remain CATL's core base. In the first half of the year, revenue reached 192.12 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 46.02%, accounting for approximately 69.38% of total revenue.
Matching revenue, CATL's total battery system capacity is 525GWh. Production reached 498GWh in the first half of the year, with capacity utilization rate climbing to 94.86%. This means the company's production lines were almost fully open in the first half of this year, with absolutely no shortage of orders. Moreover, the 498GWh capacity corresponds to revenue of 276.917 billion yuan, with an output value of about 560 million yuan per GWh, higher than the industry average.
More importantly, market share is back.
According to global power battery installation statistics by well-known institution SNE Research, CATL's global market share from January to May this year was 40.2%, a year-on-year increase of 2.2 percentage points. Sitting in the first place globally for the eighth consecutive year, market share in overseas markets outside China also increased by 3.7 percentage points to 33.7%.
Looking at the domestic market, statistics from the China Automotive Power Battery Industry Innovation Alliance show that CATL's share in passenger vehicle installation volume in the first half of this year was 46.7%, an increase of 5.6 percentage points year-on-year, a rebound for the first time in nearly three years. Especially for ternary lithium batteries, the share reached 75.2%. That is, for every 4 ternary batteries sold, 3 are from CATL.
Except for power batteries, CATL's energy storage battery revenue began to catch up in the first half of the year, reaching 53.26 billion yuan, surging 87.5% year-on-year, accounting for 19.2% of total revenue, already close to its full-year revenue last year. It has become the fastest-growing segment for CATL in the first half of the year, also becoming the second growth curve pulling CATL's revenue growth.
This also aligns with industry conditions. According to SMM data cited in CATL's semi-annual report, global energy storage cell shipment volume was about 486GWh in the first half of the year, a 93% year-on-year increase, with AI data centers becoming new demand.
In CATL's three major main businesses, the most eye-catching one in the first half of this year was actually the "recycling business" which is most easily overlooked by outsiders. Although the scale was not large at only 18.81 billion yuan, it grew by 67.2% year-on-year, and the gross margin reached the highest of the three businesses at 27.0%, an increase of 5.8 percentage points year-on-year.
With good performance on core indicators, CATL's other financial data is basically all profitable.
Net operating cash flow in the first half of the year was 60.217 billion yuan, higher than net profit attributable to parent of 43.284 billion yuan. This point is very important, indicating that company profits are not "paper profits". Company inventory was 130.819 billion yuan, with the beginning balance being 94.526 billion yuan, a half-year increase of about 38.39%. Combined with capacity utilization rate, it also explains that CATL currently has ample cash reserves.
02
King Ning Also Has A Temper
Aside from having ample reserves, the financial foundation is also thick. While releasing the semi-annual report, CATL also launched a buyback plan.
It announced the largest single share buyback plan in A-share history, planning to spend 20 billion to 40 billion yuan to buy back A-shares and cancel them all. The upper limit of the buyback price is 573 yuan/share, a premium of nearly 50% over the closing price of the day.
This amount upper limit also set the record for the largest single buyback plan in A-share history, with the previous record held by Gree Electric Appliances' 15 billion yuan in 2021. The 40 billion yuan upper limit is nearly equal to CATL's entire net profit in the first half of the year.
And unlike previous corporate stock buyback operations, a cancelled buyback means reducing registered capital. The bought-back shares will no longer circulate. Total share capital actually becomes less, directly enhancing EPS and net asset value per share for remaining shareholders. Calculating with the upper limit 40 billion and 573 yuan, the maximum buyback is about 69.808 million shares, accounting for 1.5% of total share capital. EPS enhancement is about 1.5%.
From an accounting perspective, CATL indeed can afford this money. Monetary funds on hand were 372.05 billion yuan. Even with the upper limit of 40 billion fully bought back, it only accounts for 10.8% of monetary funds. Calculated based on total assets of 1.13888 trillion yuan, 40 billion only accounts for 3.5%.
At the performance briefing, the reason for discussing buyback was very straightforward — its value was undervalued.
On the day the financial report was released, CATL A-share closing price was 383.01 yuan, while the 52-week high was 468.75 yuan. Performance hit a new high, yet stock price fell nearly 20% over half a year.
Under these premises, the 40 billion yuan buyback of real money is CATL's attitude to the market. That is I earn enough, have enough money, and have full confidence in the future. But the market's pricing for CATL is clearly too low.
03
Upstream Pressure Transmission
Despite the revenue running wild, CATL's profitability level has declined somewhat. Compared to the profit growth far exceeding revenue growth of the same period last year, this year King Ning's profit can no longer catch up to revenue growth. Revenue year-on-year increase in the first half was 54.8%, net profit attributable to parent grew 41.98%, nearly 13 percentage points slower than revenue.
The core reason is that overall gross margin dropped from 25.02% in the same period last year to 23.93%, down about 1.1 percentage points.
Broken down by business, power batteries as the core main force had the most severe gross margin decline, dropping 1.78 percentage points to 20.63%. Energy storage gross margin dropped 1.56 percentage points to 23.96%. Only the recycling business with the smallest scale saw an increase.
Management attributed the gross margin decline at the performance meeting to a "math problem". Gross margin = Gross Profit / Total Revenue. Unit gross profit remained unchanged, denominator revenue increased, gross margin got diluted.
The reason for gross profit decline is not hard to guess. Public data shows that since the beginning of this year, prices for both lithium iron phosphate and ternary materials have risen.
In January, lithium iron phosphate price was 50,000 yuan/ton, but by May, at the peak price, it exceeded 60,000 yuan, rising over 20%. And compared to the same period last year, the increase is even larger.
But raw material price hikes cannot be immediately transferred to customers because auto orders are generally long-term supply prices and cannot be adjusted in time. So this part of the cost pressure can only be borne by CATL temporarily.
Therefore, at the performance meeting, it emphasized suggesting investors pay more attention to unit net profit rather than gross margin, i.e., deduct taxes and three major expenses from gross profit. The remaining core operating profit is closer to the actual profitability of the main business.
By this standard, core operating profit in the first half of the year was 45.377 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 70.1%. Core operating profit margin rose from 14.91% to 16.39%. From this perspective, the state of the main business is better than what the balance sheet gross margin appears to be.
In addition, there is another detail easily overlooked but sufficient to affect overall profit. CATL's financial expenses in the first half of this year were -631 million yuan, while the same period last year was -5.822 billion yuan.
The main reason is foreign currency monetary items held incurred exchange losses due to exchange rate fluctuations. That is, simply due to exchange rate volatility, CATL earned 5.2 billion yuan less, and this part is a real profit increment.
In addition, car companies fleeing CATL is also starting to turn from rumors into reality. In the semi-annual report submitted by CATL, the 46.7% domestic passenger vehicle installation share, although still industry number one.
But looking at a longer time line, CATL's share in the domestic passenger vehicle market has long since dropped from a peak of over 50% in 2021, fluctuating back and forth in the range of 43% to 48% in recent years. And looking at newly launched cars recently, CATL is indeed slowly degenerating from "the only option" in car company purchase lists to "one of multiple options".
So under this trend, overseas has become the next key direction for King Ning. And the overseas performance shown in the semi-annual report corroborates that King Ning's judgment is correct.
In the first half of this year, overseas revenue reached 87.129 billion yuan, accounting for 31.46%, a year-on-year increase of 42.35%. What was eye-catching was the gross margin, as high as 29.97%, nearly 9 percentage points higher than the 21.16% in China. Factories in Hungary, the US, and Indonesia went into production successively. The customer list includes Volkswagen, BMW, Toyota, these global mainstream car companies.
From the perspective of "profit-making efficiency", overseas is clearly better. This is also why CATL is willing to spend tens of billions of euros to build factories in Europe and Southeast Asia.
However, overseas is both opportunity and variable. While business and profit space are large, tariffs, exchange rates, and geopolitical risks are more. But it is also the starting point of CATL's next round of scale expansion.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿寶騰 X50 同現代途勝來做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等。
現代途勝喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 143,888 - 197,888，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige（RM 197,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige（RM 186,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime（RM 164,888）等。
由價錢睇落，寶騰 X50 嘅起步價確實比現代途勝平咗 RM 54,088。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能會喺配備上有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
寶騰 X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
現代途勝嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 SmartSense。
呢兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別裡面安全配備都算給得幾齊全啦。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
寶騰 X50 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
現代途勝保用 5 年/300,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
寶騰 X50 同現代途勝都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總嘅嚟講，寶騰 X50 同現代途勝都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊輛，關鍵都要睇你個人嘅需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家在揀車嘅時候都會拿 寶騰 X50 同 現代 Tucson 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價碼同定位上都幾近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，總共 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
現代 Tucson 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 143,888 - 197,888，總共 5 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige（RM 197,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige（RM 186,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime（RM 164,888） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，寶騰 X50 嘅起步價確實比 現代 Tucson 平咗 RM 54,088。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但亦都要注意，平啲嘅幾千塊，喺配備上可能會有所取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
寶騰 X50 裝載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
現代 Tucson 裝載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，現代 Tucson 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 寶騰 X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區行，兩款車嘅動力都足夠，唔會覺得唔夠力。
寶騰 X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
現代 Tucson 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 SmartSense。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
寶騰 X50 保養保修 5年/150,000km，保養間隔 每10,000km或6個月。
現代 Tucson 保養保修 5年/300,000km，保養間隔 每10,000km或6個月。
寶騰 X50 同 現代 Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，寶騰 X50 同 現代 Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
Dalam pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli membandingkan Proton X50 dan Subaru Forester semasa memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kereta ini agak hampir dari segi harga dan kedudukan. Hari ini kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Proton X50 di Malaysia dijual dengan harga OTR RM 89,800 - 113,300, terdapat 4 versi, termasuk 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300) dan lain-lain.
Subaru Forester di Malaysia dijual dengan harga OTR RM 174,000 - 197,000, terdapat 3 versi, termasuk 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition (RM 189,538), 2024 2.0L S EyeSight (RM 177,538), 2024 2.0L L EyeSight (RM 167,538) dan lain-lain.
Daripada segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X50 memang lebih murah sebanyak RM 84,200 berbanding Subaru Forester. Jika bajet anda terhad, versi masuk Proton sudah dapat memenuhi keperluan harian. Namun, perbezaan harga beberapa ribu ringgit itu mungkin melibatkan kompromi dalam peralatan, bergantung sepenuhnya pada keperluan anda.
Proton X50 dilengkapi enjin 1.5L 4-cyl, kuasa 105 hp. Jimat minyak rasmi 6.0 L/100km.
Subaru Forester dilengkapi enjin 2.0L 4-cyl, kuasa 170 hp. Jimat minyak rasmi 8.0 L/100km.
Daripada segi kuasa, enjin 2.0L 4-cyl pada Subaru Forester mempunyai 65 hp lebih banyak berbanding enjin 1.5L 4-cyl pada Proton X50. Namun, untuk penggunaan harian di bandar, kuasa kedua-dua kereta sudah mencukupi dan tidak akan terasa kurang.
Panjang badan Proton X50 4400 mm, bagasi 400 L.
Panjang badan Subaru Forester 4400 mm, bagasi 400 L.
Dimensi kedua-dua kereta hampir sama, ruang dalaman tidak banyak berbeza. Kereta dalam kelas ini sudah cukup untuk penggunaan harian.
Proton X50 dan Subaru Forester adalah pilihan utama dalam pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga dan perjalanan harian. Jika anda lebih mengutamakan jenama dan harga jual semula, pilih yang mempunyai reputasi lebih baik. Jika anda lebih mementingkan nisbah harga-kepada-kualiti dan peralatan, pilih yang lebih lengkap. Pada akhirnya, disarankan untuk memandu kedua-duanya untuk pengalaman sendiri kerana itu yang paling penting.
Secara keseluruhan, Proton X50 dan Subaru Forester adalah model yang cukup baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana, kunci utama adalah melihat keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Disarankan anda membuat kajian, bandingkan pelbagai tawaran daripada banyak kedai kereta, kemudian buat keputusan akhir selepas memandu. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa untuk kajian tidak akan salah.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and the MG MG HS when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time on research.
The OTR price of the Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of the MG MG HS in Malaysia is RM 130,450 - 146,450, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L Standard (RM 105,000), 1.5L Executive (RM 115,000), etc.
From the price perspective, the starting price of the Proton X50 is indeed RM 40,650 cheaper than the MG MG HS. If your budget is limited, the entry-level version of Proton can already meet daily needs. However, keep in mind that the few thousand difference might involve trade-offs in equipment, depending on your specific needs.
The Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl engine, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
The MG MG HS is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo engine, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the MG MG HS's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than the Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power and won't feel underpowered.
The Proton X50 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The MG MG HS body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, and the interior space difference is not significant. For this class of car, it is completely sufficient for daily use.
The Proton X50 adopts a 4WD drive system.
The MG MG HS adopts an FWD drive system.
The Proton 4WD and MG FWD will feel different in handling, it is recommended to test drive and compare.
The Proton X50 warranty is 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
The MG MG HS warranty is 7 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
In general, the Proton X50 and MG MG HS are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple car dealers, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research is never wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Subaru Forester 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Subaru Forester 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 174,000 - 197,000，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition（RM 189,538）、2024 2.0L S EyeSight（RM 177,538）、2024 2.0L L EyeSight（RM 167,538） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Subaru Forester 平咗 RM 84,200。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但要留意，平嗰啲幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Subaru Forester 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Subaru Forester 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 65 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
Subaru Forester 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Subaru Forester 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Subaru 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕對比。
Proton X50 同 Subaru Forester 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更加睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更加在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後始終都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，Proton X50 同 Subaru Forester 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysia SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Kia Sportage when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing your homework.
Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, there are 4 versions in total, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Kia Sportage OTR price in Malaysia is RM 129,639 - 179,320, there are 4 versions in total, including 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High (RM 179,320), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High (RM 159,320), 2025 2.0L AT 2WD High (RM 139,639), etc.
From a price perspective, Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 39,839 cheaper than Kia Sportage. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, specifically depends on your needs.
Proton X50 is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, horsepower 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Kia Sportage is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Kia Sportage's 1.5L Turbo has 35 hp more than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power, you won't feel a lack of power.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Kia Sportage body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. For this class of cars, daily use is completely sufficient.
Proton X50 adopts 4WD drive method.
Kia Sportage adopts FWD drive method.
Proton's 4WD and Kia's FWD will have different driving feel, test drive comparison is recommended.
In summary, Proton X50 and Kia Sportage are both very good models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend everyone do their research, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time researching will absolutely not be wrong.
撰文 | 韩子涵 编辑｜青竹
一国首相，加三位内阁部长，为一家中国车企的投资站台。在欧盟对中国电动车层层加码的当下，本身就传递着一种信号。
7月23日，西班牙瓦伦西亚工厂，在首相佩德罗·桑切斯见证下，吉利汽车与福特签署合资协议，将通过产能共享，为欧洲市场打造吉利及福特品牌的新能源车。
不是买工厂，而是合资；不是打败别人，而是合作共赢。
无论是引进来，还是走出去，吉利的国际化，始终落实董事长李书福的那句话：“商业是美好的，既做生意又交朋友”。
时间拨回16年前。2010年3月28日，吉利控股集团与福特汽车集团签订沃尔沃轿车公司最终100%股权收购协议。吉利成为中国汽车行业第一家跨国公司。福特见证并支持了这一具有全球汽车产业影响力的合作案例，结下了与吉利的商业友谊。
16年后的今天，吉利与福特再度握手。对于当下井喷般的中国汽车出海，具有很强的启示性。
2026年，中国汽车出海正在经历一场从量变到质变的关键跃升。
上半年，我国汽车出口量达到509.6万辆，同比增长65.3%。6月单月出口首次突破百万辆大关。国内每下线10辆车，就有近4辆驶向海外码头。
咨询公司艾睿铂预测，中国汽车全年出口量有望达到1000万辆，将成为全球首个突破这一数字的国家。
数字背后，更深层的变化正在发生。
6月，中国主要品牌在欧洲的市场份额为13%，连续两个月超越日系品牌。当我们占据欧盟市场的更多份额，就不能只卖车那么简单，必须跟当地的产业生态、法律法规和社会福祉和谐共赢。
吉利汽车与福特成立西班牙合资公司，恰好站在这个质变的节点上。也是李书福从“走出去”到“融进去”的又一实践。
一位首相的站台，与跨越16年的两次握手
7月23日，签约仪式当天。西班牙首相佩德罗·桑切斯出现在瓦伦西亚阿尔穆萨费斯工厂，身边跟着劳工与经济部、工业与旅游部与科学部的三位部长，以及瓦伦西亚自治区主席。
阿尔穆萨费斯工厂始建于1976年，曾是福特在美国以外最大的生产基地，迄今累计生产超过1100万辆汽车。近50年来，这座工厂是西班牙瓦伦西亚地区数万家庭的生计所系。
但工业时代从不因情怀而停下脚步。2024年起，随着欧盟产业和电动化的推进，福特逐步停产蒙迪欧、S-MAX、Galaxy等多款燃油车型，偌大的工厂仅剩一条产线生产Kuga。
去年全年，这座年产能50万辆的工厂，实际只生产了不到10万辆汽车，利用率不足四分之一。曾养活数千个西班牙家庭的工厂，正面临命运的十字路口。
吉利的到来，可谓恰逢其时。通过产能共享，不但给当地带来工作岗位、产能、税收，也让福特能够以更高效的方式盘活剩余资产，继续产生价值。
根据规划，合资公司将于2027年上半年正式投入运营。
在新工厂内，吉利将投产两款新能源车型，福特也将生产三款多能源车型，包括继续生产Kuga，并于2028年投产Bronco家族全新硬派紧凑型SUV。
五款车型将共享产能、协同排产，双方在公告中表示，合资公司将“推动更多车型选择和价值的提升”，并通过“整合产量降低单车成本”。对于当地经济而言，就业岗位得以保住，一个地区的工业命脉被重新激活，可谓一举多赢。
当下，西班牙正成为中国车企登陆欧洲的战略支点。劳动力成本约为德国的三分之一，能源成本低于德国和法国，拥有世界级港口集群，巴塞罗那更是中国汽车入欧的核心门户。
2026年第一季度，中国品牌在西班牙售出约3.87万辆，同比增长67%。
吉利汽车集团CEO淦家阅说过一段话：车企出海会面对很多问题，在海外看来，中国品牌是去“占领”别人的市场，所以中国汽车品牌“走出去”，实际是要“走进去”。走进当地市场。在当地合资建厂，调动属地资源，是一种多赢路径。
对于吉利来说，虽然看似吃了一点小亏，不能独享利润。但是其实规避了很多隐形的成本和效率摩擦。
欧盟一直是高门槛市场，合规成本很高，环保要求很高，审批流程冗长，当地选民的意见和政治派系影响，会让商业行为变得复杂化。具体案例可以参考特斯拉德国工厂历劫连续剧一般的波折。
其实，现在已经有国内车企吃了同样的亏。单打独斗，一味强调野心和销量目标，反而招致很多敌意和阻碍，甚至成为当地政党政治博弈的筹码。
但吉利走的另一条路，让海外市场保住就业、让老牌车企盘活资产、让中国品牌扎根当地，让技术流动成为建设性的力量，通过“合作共赢、美美与共”让自己成为被欢迎的伙伴。
寻找战略纵深，重协同
花旗测算，若吉利获得在瓦伦西亚工厂15万辆年产能配额，成本仅相当于新建绿地工厂的10%-20%。
成本优势之外更关键的价值在于时间。从签约到投产，合资模式只需18个月，而自建工厂通常需要三到五年。在瞬息万变的欧洲电动车市场，18个月的时间差足以决定一个品牌能否卡住身位。
这套打法，吉利已在全球多个市场跑通。
在马来西亚，吉利2017年收购宝腾49.9%股份并全面主导经营。让宝腾从亏损泥潭中走出，实现品牌复兴。
2026年1月，宝腾位于丹戎马林汽车高科技谷的专属电动车工厂正式投产，首款纯电车型eMas7开启CKD本地化组装。eMas7基于吉利银河E5平台打造，连续多月蝉联马来西亚EV销量冠军。
直到今天，从马来西亚政界到民间，仍都把宝腾视为“自己的品牌”。吉利做的不是取代，是让它变得更好。
在韩国，吉利与雷诺合作推出智能混动车型。在巴西，吉利收购雷诺巴西公司26.4%股份，共享工厂产能和市场网络。
在欧洲，由沃尔沃汽车全面负责领克在欧洲区域的商业及品牌运营，助力领克品牌在欧洲的区域化拓展。
这正是吉利全球化布局的独特逻辑——并非孤军深入，而是编织一张生态协同网络。每一处合作节点，既是切入本地市场的战略支点，也是合作伙伴长期信任的实证。让全球化成为多方共赢、持续深化的价值网络。
所以，尽管「从产品出海到体系出海」已经成为行业共识，但究竟是什么体系？把自己体系硬搬过去，还是从零开始自建体系，还是融入当地体系？这些操作层面的细节，反映了一家公司的商业价值观和发展观。
吉利西班牙合资公司和背后这套逻辑，为中国汽车产业提供了一个很好的样本和思路，也反映为实实在在的增长数据。
2026年上半年，吉利汽车海外销量47.4万辆，同比增长158%，已超过2025年全年出口总量。基于上半年的表现，吉利已将全年出口上调至90万辆。
结语：从“学生”到“伙伴”，中国车企的蝶变和担当
2010年初，吉利与福特在瑞典哥德堡签署协议，以18亿美元收购全球知名的瑞典豪华品牌沃尔沃，媒体用“蛇吞象”形容这笔交易。
吉利用行动兑现了所有承诺，没有干预沃尔沃的独立运营，保护并尊重其既有发展体系，让沃尔沃在此后十余年间实现了品牌复兴。
更重要的是，吉利也从沃尔沃身上学到了体系化的研发能力、安全至上的制造标准和质量控制。这笔交易让吉利完成了一次“深造”，为日后在全球舞台上的活跃表现奠定能力基础。
传统车企手里握着现成的产能、渠道和销售团队，中国车企手里握着增长最快的新能源体系优势和成本效率，双方在这个阶段，找到了彼此都需要的东西。
正如福特欧洲区总裁吉姆·鲍姆比克所言：“ 吉利世界级的电动化能力、速度和庞大的全球规模，与福特结合，便是无与伦比的竞争优势。”
从2010年谦卑的“学生”，到2026年的平等的“伙伴”，吉利用务实换取信任，用能力赢得尊重，用最优的方式融入全球产业发展。
吉利的全球化从来不是简单的资本游戏，而是在依法合规的前提下不断探索开放共赢的全球产业合作模式，是对品牌、技术的尊重，对协同体系的布局与深构。
从沃尔沃到宝腾、莲花，再到奔驰、雷诺，以及福特，吉利打造的全球体系化协同，不仅激活了吉利全球化发展新动能，更形成了助力品牌出海的坚实保障。这也印证了李书福所说的，“商业是最平等而美好的人类文明表现形式。”
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好唔少買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿寶馬 X5 PHEV 同賓士 GLE 嚟比較。今日我哋從多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
寶馬 X5 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 486,800 - 494,800，合共有 2 個版本，包括 xDrive20i（RM 420,000）、xDrive30e（RM 480,000） 等。
賓士 GLE 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 544,888 - 544,888，合共有 1 個版本，包括 Standard（RM 544,888） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，寶馬 X5 PHEV 嘅起步價確實比賓士 GLE 平咗 RM 58,088。如果你預算有限，寶馬嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，便宜嗰幾千蚊，喺配備上可能會有取舍，具體睇你嘅需求。
寶馬 X5 PHEV 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
賓士 GLE 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
寶馬 X5 PHEV 車身長 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。
賓士 GLE 車身長 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
寶馬 X5 PHEV 同賓士 GLE 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總體嚟講，寶馬 X5 PHEV 同賓士 GLE 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對無錯。
2026年7月24日至26日，中国超级跑车锦标赛2026（China GT）珠海站在珠海国际赛车场燃擎开幕，这是本赛季继上海站和宁波站后的第三站。天丝集团红牛品牌首席代言人、85号车手王一博与队友毛骏豪再度携手，代表UNO Racing Team出征赛事最高级别GT3组别。7月25日GT3组别第一回合正赛因突发强降雨天气取消，面对充满不确定性的复杂赛道条件，王一博在7月26日第二回合正赛中率先发车，在突袭暴雨中稳定发挥，与队友合力斩获GT3 AM+组别亚军。天丝集团红牛品牌作为“首席能量官”全程深度参与，围绕赛事节点与车手突破时刻，形成一场从赛道延伸至城市消费场景的能量热潮，并以红牛“85Racing赛车系列”限定款为载体，实现红牛能量、赛道激情与泰国艺术的跨界融合，在促进中泰文化交流的同时，撬动文商旅体展融合发展的消费活力。
85号笃行突破，赛道扩容助推产业发展
继3月底在上海国际赛车场的季前测试中刷新个人最快圈速后，王一博在珠海站再度实现自我突破。2024年他曾在珠海首秀即登上领奖台，此番回到同一条赛道，面对复杂雨战环境稳健发挥，携手队友斩获 GT3 AM + 组别亚军，用赛场表现印证坚守初心、持续成长的历程。天丝集团红牛品牌为王一博训练、比赛提供全程能量支持，并以“挑战自我，突破极限”的品牌精神与车手竞技态度深度契合，也让赛场内外更多人看到：热爱与专注本身，就是一种足以突破边界的力量。
王一博的进阶之路，恰与中国赛车产业的扩容同频共振。从参赛规模扩大到关注度破圈，中国赛车运动正从小众走向大众视野，而一位跨界车手的成长，印证了这项运动正在形成吸纳多元人才、培养职业力量的良性生态。2026年6月，商务部等9部门印发《关于培育壮大汽车后市场消费若干措施的通知》，提出积极发展汽车赛事运动、深化商文旅体健融合发展、加强赛车人才队伍建设等部署，为赛车运动规范化、大众化发展打开空间，也让更多跨界爱好者拥有通往职业赛场的成长通道，助推国内汽车运动产业高质量发展。
红牛85 Racing系列限定款，跨越赛道的中泰文化交流
赛场之上，85号车手在直线与弯道之间不断突破极限；赛场之外，天丝集团红牛品牌将这份赛道激情借由系列限定款红牛产品，传递给更多爱好者。珠海站期间，红牛品牌联合泰国艺术家推出“85 Racing赛车系列”限定款包装，把赛道上的速度感与突破精神融入产品视觉设计。该系列以流动线条勾勒“85”主体轮廓，复刻赛道上的飞驰轨迹，并以鲜明热烈的色彩诠释红牛品牌的无限活力与泰式美学。本次限定系列结合经典金罐红牛®维生素风味饮料和瓶装红牛®能量饮料两款备受欢迎的红牛产品，分别诠释“能量视野”和“蓄势向前”两大理念；另有“能量勋章”主题的专属同行款同时覆盖上述两款红牛产品，致敬85号车手王一博的赛季突破，与一众同好珍藏专属赛道记忆。目前，该限定系列已限时登陆京东红牛 RedBull 自营旗舰店，同时亮相China GT珠海站赛事现场的红牛品牌快闪店。
天丝集团红牛品牌源自泰国、扎根中国，长期致力于搭建中泰文化交流、民心相通的桥梁。本次推出的红牛“85 Racing赛车系列”限定款，以红牛饮料为载体，让泰国艺术家的创意表达与中国赛车文化相融碰撞，成为推动中泰文化交融互动的生动实践。
泰国驻广州总领事沈勇俊（Mr. Kajtiti Wiwatwanont）表示：“体育和艺术是跨越语言与国界的人文纽带，也是增进泰中两国民众相互理解的重要桥梁。此次天丝集团以热门赛事为契机，将泰国艺术与中国的赛车文化相融合，让泰式美学有了更具活力的表达方式，也为两国年轻人在体育与艺术领域创造了新的交流契机。我们乐见更多这样的文化互动，也期待以国际赛事和艺术文化交流为纽带，进一步深化泰中两国友好合作与人文往来。”
赛事燃擎，激活城市消费新动能
赛事价值早已突破赛道边界，成为拉动城市文旅消费的重要引擎。珠海践行“以赛兴城”理念，持续放大“票根经济”效应，积极推动赛事经济与城市消费的深度融合，将赛事流量转化为城市文旅增量。
天丝集团红牛品牌也积极围绕赛事打造贯通赛场、商圈的消费场景与体验：赛事现场落地红牛品牌快闪店，为现场观众带来丰富互动体验和红牛能量饮品，并联合 UNO Coffee 打造联名特调咖啡，以跨界互动和饮品创新激发消费活力；商圈中限时打造主题店，依托限定周边权益打造粉丝打卡阵地，推动赛车文化走进城市日常，带动赛事热度、城市消费与文旅体验深度融合。
天丝集团中国区首席执行官曾森鸿表示：“赛车运动不仅是竞技场上的速度角逐，更是链接城市、文化与消费的多元平台。天丝集团红牛品牌以能量内核激荡赛道激情，同时长期支持体育、音乐、文化等领域跨界融合，探索多元场景融入，激活城市消费与文旅活力。红牛始终相信，能量不止于赛场，更在与优质体验、城市消费、文化交流的共振中持续释放。”
天丝集团红牛品牌在支持车手竞技突破的同时，将品牌能量延伸至赛事之外，让赛车文化与城市生活、让泰国创意与赛道活力交汇碰撞。从赛道上的极速竞逐，到赛场外的文化共振，再到城市里的消费升温——China GT珠海站所展现的，不只是赛场速度，更是城市与人文温度。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Audi Q5 同 Porsche Macan 嚟做比較。今日我哋由多個角度做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Audi Q5 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 354,174 - 423,174，一共有 2 個版本，包括 40 TDI（RM 320,000）、45 TFSI（RM 350,000）等。
Porsche Macan 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 469,000 - 469,000，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 55 quattro S line（RM 467,285）、2025 50 quattro Advanced（RM 361,135）、PMT 1874, Lorong IKS BukitTengah 14000 Bukit Mertajam（RM 296,610）等。
從價錢睇落，Audi Q5 嘅起步價確實比 Porsche Macan 平咗 RM 114,826。如果你預算有限，Audi 嘅入門版已經可以满足日常需求。但都要留意，嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Audi Q5 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Porsche Macan 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。
Audi Q5 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Porsche Macan 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Audi Q5 同 Porsche Macan 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用途、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嘅嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嘅嗰款。最終都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，Audi Q5 同 Porsche Macan 都係馬來西亞市場幾好嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。希望大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會用本田 Civic Type R 同福斯 Golf GTI 嚟做比較。今日我哋從多個層面做一次詳細嘅對比，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
本田 Civic Type R 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 399,900 - 399,900，合共有 3 個版本，包括 2023 2.0T Standard（RM 399,900）、OTR NI（RM 399,900）、富豪 ES90（RM 339,888） 等。
福斯 Golf GTI 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 256,962 - 256,962，合共有 3 個版本，包括 2025 2.0T Sepang Edition（RM 262,990）、2025 2.0T Standard（RM 256,962）、DCT（RM 219,800） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，福斯 Golf GTI 嘅起價比本田 Civic Type R 平咗 RM 142,938。講真喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差別其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期持有成本。
本田 Civic Type R 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括品牌 ADAS。
福斯 Golf GTI 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 IQ.Drive。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過本田 Civic Type R 嘅品牌 ADAS 同福斯 Golf GTI 嘅 IQ.Drive 喺功能上有些分別，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比吓兩者嘅功能列表。
本田 Civic Type R 保養保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
福斯 Golf GTI 保養保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
本田 Civic Type R 同福斯 Golf GTI 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總括嚟講，本田 Civic Type R 同福斯 Golf GTI 都係馬來西亞市場好好嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Toyota Camry 同 Mercedes-Benz A-Class 嚟做比較。今日我哋由多個方面做詳細嘅對比，幫各位省咗做功課嘅時間。
Toyota Camry 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 221,800 - 248,800，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 2.5L Standard（RM 248,800）、2025 2.5L Standard（RM 221,800） 等。
Mercedes-Benz A-Class 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 241,888 - 269,888，一共有 1 個版本，包括 Standard（RM 241,888） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Toyota Camry 嘅起步價的確比 Mercedes-Benz A-Class 平咗 RM 20,088。如果你預算有限，Toyota 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但亦都要留意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有所取舍，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Toyota Camry 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 TSS 2.5。
Mercedes-Benz A-Class 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Toyota Camry 嘅 TSS 2.5 同 Mercedes-Benz A-Class 嘅 Premium ADAS 喺功能上有少少分別，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
Toyota Camry 車身長度 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
Mercedes-Benz A-Class 車身長度 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾咁一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Toyota Camry 保用 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mercedes-Benz A-Class 保用 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總嚟講，Toyota Camry 同 Mercedes-Benz A-Class 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一個，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議各位做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Volkswagen Golf 同 Mercedes-Benz E-Class 嚟做比較。而家我哋從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
Volkswagen Golf 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 186,530 - 186,530，總共有 1 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T R-Line（RM 186,530）等。
Mercedes-Benz E-Class 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 363,888 - 363,888，總共有 2 個版本，包括 E 200 Avantgarde（RM 350,000）、E 300 AMG Line（RM 400,000）等。
從價錢嚟睇，Volkswagen Golf 嘅起步價確實比 Mercedes-Benz E-Class 平咗 RM 177,358。如果你預算有限，Volkswagen 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
Volkswagen Golf 配備 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
Mercedes-Benz E-Class 配備 2.0L Turbo，馬力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
動力方面，Mercedes-Benz E-Class 嘅 2.0L Turbo 比 Volkswagen Golf 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 多咗 50 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開嘅話，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Volkswagen Golf 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
Mercedes-Benz E-Class 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Volkswagen Golf 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mercedes-Benz E-Class 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
總體嚟講，Volkswagen Golf 同 Mercedes-Benz E-Class 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿福斯 Golf R 同保時捷 718 黎做比較。今日我哋由多個方面做個詳細對比，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
福斯 Golf R 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 338,812 - 338,812，總共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 2.0T Standard（RM 338,812）、DCT（RM 294,800）等。
保時捷 718 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 545,000 - 1,700,000，總共有 6 個版本，包括 2025 AMG G 63（RM 1,948,888）、2025 Cayman 2.0T（RM 585,000）、2025 Boxster 2.0T（RM 545,000）等。
由價錢睇，福斯 Golf R 嘅起步價確實比保時捷 718 平咗 RM 206,188。如果你預算有限，福斯嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但亦都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有所取舍，具體就要睇你嘅需求。
福斯 Golf R 配備 2.0L Turbo，馬力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
保時捷 718 配備 3.0L Turbo，馬力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
動力方面，保時捷 718 嘅 3.0L Turbo 比福斯 Golf R 嘅 2.0L Turbo 多咗 130 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開嘅話，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會有覺得唔夠力。
福斯 Golf R 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
保時捷 718 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾近一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
福斯 Golf R 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
保時捷 718 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
總體嚟講，福斯 Golf R 同保時捷 718 都係馬來西亞市場幾好嘅車型。揀邊一款，關鍵係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕先至決定。買車係一件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
© 2024 Bitauto.com. All Rights Reserved.
Bitauto (www.yiche.com and www.bitauto.com) is one of the most visited automotive websites in China. We provide detailed info on Chinese car brands available in your area. Please note that the information provided on this website is based on publicly available data and is for reference only. It may not be fully updated or accurate at all times.
Help us improve our website
