Homehomeland
Search History
Popular Searches
Dealer Login / Sign Up
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都係會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 Kia Sportage 嚟作比較。呢兩款車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，合共 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等。
Kia Sportage 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,639 - 179,320，合共 4 個版本，包括 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High（RM 179,320）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High（RM 159,320）、2025 2.0L AT 2WD High（RM 139,639） 等。
由價錢嚟睇，Perodua Aruz 嘅起步價真係比 Kia Sportage 平咗 RM 56,739。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以满足日常需求。但亦要留意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Perodua Aruz 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Kia Sportage 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Perodua Aruz 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Kia Sportage 保修 5 年/300,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Perodua Aruz 同 Kia Sportage 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，咁就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Kia Sportage 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車款。揀邊輛，關鍵始終都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係一件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 Honda WR-V 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近嘅，今日我哋就從多個角度做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Honda WR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,900 - 107,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2023 1.5L V（RM 99,900）、2023 1.5L E（RM 95,900）、2023 1.5L S（RM 89,900） 等。
從價錢睇落，Proton X50 嘅起步價的確比 Honda WR-V 平咗 RM 100。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有所取舍，具體就要睇你嘅需要啦。
Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Honda WR-V 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
兩款車用嘅係同一套動力系統，日常開落嚟嘅感受基本冇分別。油耗方面都幾差不多，唔使太糾結呢一點。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Honda WR-V 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Honda SENSING。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級數入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Proton X50 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Honda WR-V 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X50 同 Honda WR-V 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你好重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑好嗰款；如果你好重視性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後始終建議兩款都去試下車，親身體驗先係最緊要。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 Honda WR-V 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再嚟試車做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Kia Sportage when selecting a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR selling price of Perodua Aruz in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
The OTR selling price of Kia Sportage in Malaysia is RM 129,639 - 179,320, with a total of 4 versions, including 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High (RM 179,320), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High (RM 159,320), 2025 2.0L AT 2WD High (RM 139,639), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Perodua Aruz is indeed RM 56,739 cheaper than Kia Sportage. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, keep in mind, the few thousand dollars difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Perodua Aruz is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Kia Sportage is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Kia Sportage's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient and won't feel underpowered.
Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.
Kia Sportage safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Drive Wise.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are considered quite comprehensive in this class. New cars nowadays do not lack in safety, so there is no need to worry too much about this point.
Perodua Aruz adopts FWD drive mode.
Kia Sportage adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, there won't be much difference in daily driving experience.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Kia Sportage are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing thorough research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending time on research will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Perodua Aruz and Subaru Crosstrek when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing your research.
The OTR price of Perodua Aruz in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900. There are 2 versions in total, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
The OTR price of Subaru Crosstrek in Malaysia is RM 145,000 - 160,000. There is 1 version in total, including 2.0L e-Boxer (RM 150,000), etc.
In terms of price, the entry price of Perodua Aruz is indeed RM 72,100 cheaper than Subaru Crosstrek. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry version is sufficient for daily needs. However, note that the cost saving of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Perodua Aruz is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Subaru Crosstrek is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Regarding power, Subaru Crosstrek's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power and won't feel underpowered.
Perodua Aruz adopts FWD drive mode.
Subaru Crosstrek adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, which is FWD. There won't be much difference in daily driving experience.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Subaru Crosstrek warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Perodua Aruz and Subaru Crosstrek are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both models, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Perodua Aruz and Subaru Crosstrek are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealers, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, spending time on research is never wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Honda WR-V when choosing a car.
Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Honda WR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
From a price perspective, Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 100 cheaper than Honda WR-V. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the difference of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X50 adopts 4WD drive system.
Honda WR-V adopts FWD drive system.
Proton's 4WD and Honda's FWD offer different driving experiences; test drives are recommended for comparison.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda WR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Proton X50 and Honda WR-V are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
In general, both Proton X50 and Honda WR-V are excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several car dealers, and then test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter; spending time doing research will never go wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿寶騰 X70 同馬自達 CX-30 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做詳細對比，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
馬自達 CX-30 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 122,409 - 146,409，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L High+ Premium（RM 146,409）、2025 2.0L High+（RM 138,409）、2025 2.0L High（RM 130,409） 等。
睇返價錢，寶騰 X70 嘅起步價確實比馬自達 CX-30 平咗 RM 15,609。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，喺配備上可能会有取舍，具體要看你嘅需要。
寶騰 X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
馬自達 CX-30 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級數入面安全配備都算給得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都不錯，唔使太擔心呢一點。
寶騰 X70 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
馬自達 CX-30 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保養條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要看品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問下真實車主嘅經驗。
寶騰 X70 同馬自達 CX-30 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，咁就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先最重要。
總嚟講，寶騰 X70 同馬自達 CX-30 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Honda CR-V when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of Honda CR-V in Malaysia is RM 178,200 - 195,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 71,400 cheaper than Honda CR-V. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, be aware that the few thousand ringgit saved may involve compromises in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
Honda CR-V is equipped with 2.0L 4-cyl, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption is 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Honda CR-V's 2.0L 4-cyl has 30 more horsepower than Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, and you won't feel underpowered.
Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Honda CR-V's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive for this class. New car safety is generally good nowadays, so there's no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X70 uses FWD drive mode.
Honda CR-V uses FWD drive mode.
Both cars use the same drive mode, both are FWD, so there won't be a big difference in daily driving feel.
Overall, Proton X70 and Honda CR-V are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time researching will definitely not be a mistake.
By 2025, China's energy-saving and new energy vehicle talent gap reached one million. The supply-demand ratio for intelligent driving engineers is only 0.38, with fewer than one qualified candidate corresponding to one position on average.
More troubling is that even if double salaries are offered, it is difficult to poach a suitable intelligent system engineer from the market. Power batteries, intelligent driving, and three-electric systems, every emerging field is calling for more people, while graduates in traditional mechanics and processes face fierce competition in the job market. The old recruitment logic of "filling gaps where they exist" is failing.
How to solve this? At the Talent Sub-forum of the 2026 China Automotive Forum, guests gave the same answer: stop hoping to poach ready-made people from the market, but instead start training them internally.
Automotive Engineers Are Being Redefined
Why do HRs need to understand business more today? Because talent demand has changed.
In the past, what talent an automaker lacked, the answer was relatively clear. Engines, chassis, bodywork, processes, almost every position corresponded to a specific type of professional talent. HRs mostly handled matching positions and finding talent.
Today, companies discuss more about intelligent driving, large models, embodied intelligence, globalization... These changes ultimately affect the talent, and give the profession of automotive engineer a new profile.
Image Source: 2026 China Automotive Forum
Li Zhele, Secretary-General of the Automotive Talent Professional Committee of the China Talent Research Association, outlined the changes in automotive talent competency models in recent years. In the past, problem-solving ability was emphasized; now, complex problem-solving ability is emphasized more; in the past, learning ability was emphasized; now, rapid learning is required; in the past, it was more about imitative innovation; now, pioneering innovation is valued more and more. Among the six core competencies, almost every one has changed.
The changes appeared first in R&D teams. A set of survey data shared by Li Zhele shows that in 2025, software algorithm engineers at an eastern coastal automaker accounted for up to 70% of intelligent connected R&D personnel. Software developers in some top enterprises accounted for more than 50% of the R&D team.
This data does not negate the importance of mechanical engineering, but it shows the R&D team is changing. The knowledge system involved in automotive R&D is constantly expanding, extending from mechanical design to electronic electrical, software development, artificial intelligence, control engineering, and other fields. A single major is still important, but more and more positions start requiring interdisciplinary collaboration.
The growth pace has also quickened. In the past, it often took five to ten years for an automotive engineer from joining the company to independently undertake R&D work. Today, automotive R&D campus recruits can independently handle positions in an average of 19 months, in some intelligent connected components fields, it is even shortened to 15 months.
Research by Li Zhele's team on nearly 500 leading automotive talents also shows that talent with over 10 years of work experience accounts for 78%, the average age of leading talents is 37. The overall growth cycle of domestic leading talents has been shortened by 5 to 10 years compared to international peers.
The speed increased, requirements also improved. Li Zhele believes that in the future, more and more simple, certain, predictable tasks will be handed over to AI. Engineers will face more complex, uncertain, non-standard answer problems. That is to say, the automotive industry will not eliminate a certain major, but will eliminate people who stop evolving.
Image Source: 2026 China Automotive Forum
Similar judgments are also confirmed on the enterprise side. Geng Yi, General Manager of Changan Automobile's Industry-Education Integration Division, mentioned that today, the problems engineers face daily have gradually extended from component design to algorithm iteration, user experience optimization, and technology route selection. These problems are hard to complete relying on a single discipline, and standard answers rarely exist.
When the job profile of automotive engineers changes, those responsible for recruitment must perceive this change first. Li Zhele said a sentence: "HRs today need to know astronomy above and geography below, and also understand history. At least when meeting with business departments, you shouldn't be completely unable to understand what others are saying."
At first glance, this sounds like a requirement for HRs. But as the forum progressed, this statement received more specific annotations. The few automaker HR heads sharing next, almost none talked only about recruitment.
NIO Automobile HR Director Ding Wuxia concurrently introduced NIO's three brands, battery swapping system, and global R&D layout. XPeng Automobile Global Recruitment Director Dong Hanyu also first spoke about company positioning: besides cars, XPeng is also laying out ahead areas like flying cars, humanoid robots, with the goal of becoming a global embodied intelligence company. Afterwards, he elaborated on his thinking regarding recruitment talents.
This is not a coincidence in the sharing order. In the intelligent car era, what a company will do in the future, what kind of people it needs, and what capabilities these people must possess, can increasingly no longer be answered solely by job descriptions. The starting point of recruitment work has changed accordingly.
Recruitment standards are also adjusting accordingly. More and more companies are starting to seek composite talents who understand mechanics and are familiar with software, electronic electrical, algorithm fields, etc. Compared to a single professional capability, systems thinking and cross-domain collaboration capabilities are being mentioned more frequently.
Going Global, Another Talent War Battlefield
The domestic market is still adapting to this round of talent changes, globalization has pushed corporate talent demands to a new dimension. At the forum, multiple guests talked about going global, and the focus of the discussion was what kind of people enterprises need after 'going out'.
Li Kang, a member of the Committee for National Automotive Vocational Education Guidance of the Ministry of Education, divided Chinese car going global into three stages: product going global, brand and technology deep going global, and global ecosystem co-construction. Corresponding to different development stages, enterprise talent demands are also constantly changing.
Initially, enterprises relied more on expatriate teams, copying mature products, technologies, and management experience overseas. As business deepened, companies started establishing local R&D, manufacturing, and supply chain systems, with increasing demand for localized talent. Upon reaching the global operation stage, enterprises need to both establish unified talent standards and form cross-cultural collaboration and global management capabilities.
Image Source: Chery
Many enterprises have reached the second step, and some are even starting to move towards the third step.
Taking Chery as an example, it reactivated the local car brand Ebro in Spain, and participated in local industrial development through local production, brand operations, etc. Chery Chairman Yin Tongyue once proposed the concept of 'In somewhere, For somewhere, Be somewhere', hoping the enterprise can truly integrate locally, rather than simply selling products overseas.
In recent years, more and more Chinese automakers are starting to layout overseas factories, R&D centers, and supply chain systems. Products can enter the market, production lines can be replicated, what truly needs time to build is often people and organizations.
This point was reflected more concretely in Changan Automobile's sharing. Geng Yi mentioned that after the company entered the Thai market, there were labor disputes between Chinese and local employees regarding overtime culture. Compared to technology and products, these differences often have no unified answer.
From this, it can be seen that as Chinese automakers continue to enter new markets, enterprises need to face not only product certification and supply chain construction, but also a series of new topics including labor laws, talent development, organizational management, cultural integration, etc.
At the forum venue, many guests placed 'localization' in a more important position. Globalization layout has broken the talent boundaries of traditional localized operations. What enterprises need is not only R&D, manufacturing, and other professional talents, but also composite talents familiar with overseas regulations, cross-cultural communication, international operations, etc. As overseas business continues to expand, this talent gap is gradually appearing.
NIO chose to advance the globalization layout. Ding Wuxia introduced that NIO has always configured R&D resources according to globalization ideas. 'Where the talent is, NIO builds offices there.' In her opinion, when enterprises layout R&D centers, the first consideration is talent resources, rather than simply dividing by region.
Changan, however, focused its eyes on vocational education. It is promoting the 'Changan Workshop' project, building industry-education integration bases in overseas vocational colleges, hoping to combine enterprise standards, technical systems, and talent cultivation. Geng Yi stated that if Chinese brands hope to take root overseas long-term, just selling products there is not enough, it also needs to let local students familiarize with Chinese brands, Chinese technology, and Chinese standards.
Under this trend, the focus of enterprise concern has also gradually extended from 'selling cars out' to 'taking capabilities out'. This capability includes both R&D and manufacturing, as well as talent cultivation, organizational management, and cultural integration.
What enterprises lack going global is not just people who understand foreign languages. What enterprises hope to find are people who both understand the Chinese automotive industry and are familiar with local regulations, culture, and business environments. This type of talent can connect headquarters with overseas teams, and also help enterprises understand the operating rules of different markets.
Ultimately, It's a Race on Who Cultivates Faster
If in previous years automakers were still competing for talent, then another signal transmitted at this year's forum is that more and more enterprises are starting to focus their centers on cultivation systems.
The reason is not complex. Trends like intelligent driving, software development, AI large models, globalization, etc., put the industry in rapid change. This leads to talent needed by enterprises becoming newer, however mature talent in the market has not increased synchronously. Relying solely on social recruitment makes it difficult to solve long-term talent supply problems.
XPeng Automobile's Dong Hanyu shared a set of data. In 2025, XPeng's management and technical campus recruitment scale was about 500 people; in 2026, this number has already exceeded 1000 people; by 2027, the plan is close to 2000 people. Three categories of positions (management technical, production manufacturing, front-line sales) total campus recruitment scale will reach 5000 people.
Geely Group recruited more than 4000 fresh graduates in 2026. Geely Holding Group Senior Vice President Yang Xueliang said, "We internally call them wild geese. They are all one in a hundred, talented, and passionate young people. We hope they find their positioning on Geely's big stage and hone themselves."
The increase in number is just part of the change. Taking XPeng as an example, it is adjusting the entire talent strategy, shifting from the past dominated by social recruitment with campus recruitment as supplement, gradually towards a long-term model based on campus recruitment, young talent as the main body, and cultivation as key. By 2027, XPeng's campus recruitment proportion of total recruitment will increase from 50% to 70%.
Such adjustments are closely related to the development pace of enterprise business. In XPeng's view, AI has become the basic tool for R&D work. Young people contact new tools faster, learn faster, and adapt to new R&D ways more easily.
Image Source: 2026 China Automotive Forum
Around this idea, XPeng redesigned the fresh graduate cultivation mechanism. New employees implement separate performance and promotion management for the first three years after joining, not sharing evaluation channels with social recruitment employees, hoping to leave a more complete growth cycle for young talent.
Changan Automobile focuses on a more upstream link of talent cultivation. Geng Yi believes that enterprises adjust product and technical directions every year, while school talent cultivation plans usually take several years to complete an update, and there is always a time lag between the two.
In the past, the talent cultivation of many enterprises started from recruitment; now, more and more enterprises are turning their eyes to schools.
Changan established an independent legal person-operated industry-education integration company, hoping to bring enterprise demands forward into the talent cultivation link, letting curriculum settings, practical training content maintain closer connections with industrial development.
In Geng Yi's view, enterprise participation in schooling is not to lock students in advance, but to hope that the people cultivated by schools can adapt to the industrial development pace faster.
Schools also feel this change. Wuhu Vocational and Technical University School of Automotive and Aviation Dean Peng Ding shared a realistic problem. Enterprises may launch multiple new products and technologies in a year, while school talent cultivation plan updates require longer cycles. When rapid industrial change becomes the norm, schools also need to continuously adjust curriculum systems, practical teaching, and school-enterprise cooperation methods.
Facing new demands proposed by enterprises, schools no longer first consider 'can they do it', but 'how to do it as soon as possible'.
This change is not just curriculum adjustment. More and more vocational colleges are starting to introduce real enterprise projects into the classroom, letting students contact actual enterprise R&D and production scenarios during the learning phase, and also allowing enterprises to participate in talent cultivation earlier.
Compared to training after recruitment, this method brings the cultivation cycle further forward. NIO saw another type of change. New businesses such as direct sales systems, battery swapping networks, user communities, etc., are constantly developing, also giving rise to a batch of new positions that did not exist before. For many positions, there are no mature talents in the market for direct recruitment; enterprises can only explore business and cultivate teams at the same time.
According to introductions, NIO established a complete talent system around values, including goal setting, performance evaluation, incentive feedback, etc., hoping to help employees grow continuously during business development.
Image Source: BYD
Looking at them together, although companies like XPeng, Changan, NIO chose different paths, the focus points are getting closer and closer. That is to say, compared to finding ready-made talent, enterprises are starting to invest more energy in building long-term talent supply capabilities.
In the past, automotive enterprises relied more on the market to solve talent problems. Today, more and more enterprises are starting to build their own talent systems. And this change is still continuing.
It can be seen that the discussion of the entire forum has exceeded recruitment itself. Engineers need to face new technical systems, enterprises need to adapt to global competition, universities are adjusting talent cultivation models, more and more automakers are starting to shift the cultivation system forward. The change in talent work almost runs through every link of automotive industry development.
In the past, the automotive industry discussed more about how many people are missing. Nowadays, enterprises are more concerned about what kind of people are needed, and how to cultivate such people faster. Understanding business, understanding strategy, understanding industrial directions, has become an important prerequisite for judging talent demand.
And when the automotive industry enters a new development stage, talent competition also begins to enter a new stage.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Honda HR-V when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of Honda HR-V in Malaysia is RM 115,900 - 143,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.
From the price perspective, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 9,100 cheaper than Honda HR-V. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware, the few thousand cheaper may involve trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive mode.
Honda HR-V adopts FWD drive mode.
The drive mode for both cars is the same, both are FWD, there won't be much difference in daily driving experience.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda HR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Proton X70 and Honda HR-V are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with more configurations. Ultimately, it is suggested to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
In general, both Proton X70 and Honda HR-V are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from more dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Subaru Crosstrek when choosing a car. The prices and positioning of these two cars are quite close. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X50's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 variants, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The Subaru Crosstrek's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 145,000 - 160,000, with a total of 1 variant, including 2.0L e-Boxer (RM 150,000), etc.
From a price perspective, the Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 55,200 cheaper than the Subaru Crosstrek. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
The Proton X50 is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, horsepower 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
The Subaru Crosstrek is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Subaru Crosstrek's 1.5L Turbo has 35 horsepower more than the Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power, you won't feel it lacks power.
The Proton X50's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The Subaru Crosstrek's safety rating is 5★ (Euro NCAP), active safety systems include EyeSight.
In terms of safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, there are some differences in functionality between the Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and the Subaru Crosstrek's EyeSight. If you value active safety highly, you can carefully compare their feature lists.
The Proton X50 warranty is 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
The Subaru Crosstrek warranty is 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, both the Proton X50 and Subaru Crosstrek are excellent models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing thorough research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending time on research is never wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 寶騰 X50 同 三菱 Xforce 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都蠻接近嘅，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
三菱 Xforce 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 109,930 - 119,930，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Ultimate（RM 119,930）、2026 1.5L Urban（RM 109,930） 等。
從價錢來看，寶騰 X50 嘅起步價確實比 三菱 Xforce 平咗 RM 20,130。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以满足日常需要。但都要留意，便宜嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有所取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
寶騰 X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
三菱 Xforce 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，三菱 Xforce 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 寶騰 X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
寶騰 X50 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
三菱 Xforce 保用 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
寶騰 X50 同 三菱 Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總之嚟講，寶騰 X50 同 三菱 Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵都係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X70 同 Honda HR-V 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，而家我哋就從多個方面嚟做一个詳細嘅對比，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
Honda HR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 115,900 - 143,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS（RM 143,900）、2026 1.5T V（RM 137,900）、2026 1.5T E（RM 130,900） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X70 嘅起價確實比 Honda HR-V 平咗 RM 9,100。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但亦要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Honda HR-V 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
Honda HR-V 車身長 4500 mm，行李箱 450 L。
空間方面，Honda HR-V 嘅車身比 Proton X70 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Proton X70 喺城市入面泊車會靈活啲，各有取舍。
Proton X70 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Honda HR-V 保用 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總嚟講，Proton X70 同 Honda HR-V 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再嚟試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
Belakangan ini, isu di mana kenderaan elektrik baharu yang dibeli di dalam negara dipandu jauh di luar negara telah mencetuskan strategi jaminan keselamatan yang menyebabkan fungsi berkaitan rangkaian sistem kereta terhad, telah menemui penyelesaian yang memuaskan.
Sebelum ini, pemilik kereta itu kerana lokasi kenderaan ditetapkan di kawasan luar negara untuk tempoh lama, telah mencetuskan mekanisme kawalan risiko di belakang papan pengaturcara syarikat kereta, fungsi pintar seperti hiburan audio visual sistem kereta telah disekat untuk sementara waktu, setelah pemilik itu memaparkan pengalamannya ke platform sosial telah mencetuskan perbincangan meluas.
Menjawab hal ini, Zeekr secara rasmi telah memberikan penjelasan dan segera melancarkan langkah pengoptimuman pada awal pagi pada hari ke-26. Pihak Zeekr mengaku, sekatan sistem kereta ini walaupun dengan niat asal untuk melindungi harta pengguna, namun dari segi tahap pengalaman pengguna benar-benar wujud ruang untuk penambahbaikan, menggabungkan maklum balas pengguna dan warganet, segera memajukan pengoptimuman.
Langkah utama adalah untuk mengoptimumkan pengalaman jaminan keselamatan keluar negara, aplikasi Zeekr telah menambah pautan fungsi "Perlindungan Lintas Negara", pemilik hanya perlu satu tekan untuk memohon,即可 cepat selesai buka kunci sendiri, memudahkan proses; "suis fungsi Perlindungan Lintas Negara" yang sedang dibangunkan, pada masa hadapan akan dihantar melalui OTA.
Modul ini menjadi sistem jaminan keselamatan keluar negara menyeluruh pertama dalam industri, juga merupakan kes contoh tipikal yang mendorong kemajuan industri dengan usaha bersama pengguna, warganet dan pengeluar kereta.
官方快速响应，分步优化安全保障体验Menurut laporan, pemilik kereta itu memandu sendiri dari Henan, setelah memasuki Kazakhstan, sistem kereta memaparkan antaramuka amaran kuat, fungsi pintar seperti navigasi, audio visual telah terhad. Wartawan menyahkan, sistem pemacu utama seperti kuasa, brek kenderaan sentiasa normal, tidak wujud keadaan "tidak boleh dipandu". Sekarang ini, kenderaan itu telah selesai pengesahan, amaran kuat sistem kereta telah dibatalkan.
Selepas kejadian, Zeekr dengan rendah hati mendengar cadangan pengguna, respons pantas terhadap tuntutan media, laksana rancangan pengoptimuman berperingkat, melibatkan jaminan keselamatan kenderaan dan pengalaman penggunaan pemilik.
Rancangan pengoptimuman khusus termasuk: Pertama, aplikasi Zeekr secara rasmi melancarkan pautan fungsi "Perlindungan Lintas Negara". Pemilik hanya perlu satu tekan untuk memohon,即可 cepat dapatkan kod sahihan, selesai buka kunci sendiri, memudahkan proses, meningkatkan kecekapan respons. Kedua, "suis fungsi Perlindungan Lintas Negara" yang sedang dibangunkan, pada masa hadapan akan dihantar melalui OTA. Selepas suis ini dilancarkan, "Perlindungan Lintas Negara" akan secara lalai dalam keadaan ditutup, sebelum keluar negara pemilik boleh memilih membuka atau menutup secara manual di telefon mudah alih mengikut keperluan sendiri. Jika pemilik secara aktif membuka fungsi ini, masih boleh melalui pautan aplikasi Zeekr "Perlindungan Lintas Negara" untuk melakukan buka kunci sendiri. Ketiga, khusus untuk pengguna yang telah keluar negara atau akan keluar negara, Zeekr membuka talian khidmat pelanggan 24 jam (400-003-6036) akan menyediakan laluan akses prioriti. Jika berhadapan dengan kegagalan buka kunci atau keadaan kecemasan, Zeekr akan secara cepat berikan bantuan jauh.
Pihak Zeekr menyatakan, merek berpegang pada niat asal keselamatan penuh muktamad, sentiasa letak pengalaman pengguna dan keselamatan di tempat pertama, juga sentiasa重视 setiap suara sebenar. Masa hadapan akan secara berterusan kumpulkan, dengar maklum balas pemilik, iterasi optumasi strategi kawalan risiko keselamatan dan proses perkhidmatan perjalanan lintas negara, di antara memperkokoh pertahanan keselamatan harta dan data serta mengoptimumkan pengalaman perjalanan pengguna, secara berterusan mencari titik keseimbangan yang lebih sempurna.
记者调研：新能源行业普遍使用风控设计，但体验有待完善Sebenarnya, pengeluar kereta kenderaan elektrik melaksanakan sistem kawalan risiko lintas negara, bukan sarana kawalan yang berlebihan, tetapi jaminan perlu untuk menghadapi aktiviti haram lintas negara kenderaan masa kini, melindungi hak pemilik. Pada tahun-tahun kebelakangan ini, pencurian dan rampasan kenderaan elektrik lintas negara, kekacauan penguraian dan selundupan kerap berlaku. Sebelum ini, model flagship merek baharu pernah dicuri dan dirampas kemudian diangkut ke luar negara, kenderaan dengan cepat dialihkan hak milik, akaun sistem kereta dan maklumat pendaftaran telah diubah oleh jauh, menyebabkan pemilik tidak ada jalan untuk mempertahankan hak. Di beberapa tempat juga pernah diselesaikan kes kehilangan kenderaan baru secara besar-besaran lintas negara, di sebalik memang kekurangan mekanisme perlindungan keselamatan meninggalkan kelemahan keselamatan.
Data industri menyatakan, sekatan sistem kereta pada asalnya adalah strategi perlindungan keselamatan kereta global yang matang. Mercedes, BMW, Porsche, Tesla dan lain-lain pengeluar kereta teratas global juga melaksanakan mekanisme serupa, semasa Perang Rusia-Ukraine, di atas merek dalam keadaan kekurangan mekanisme komunikasi cadangan dan reka bentuk toleran pintar, kerana gangguan atau gangguan isyarat luar menyebabkan sistem anti-pencurian mencetuskan mekanisme pencegahan keselamatan, lalu terkunci kenderaan secara paksa.
Tetapi untuk tempoh yang lama, kebanyakan pengeluar kereta hanya fokus pada laksana kawalan risiko, ringan terhadap pemberitahuan pengguna dan penyesuaian pengalaman, proses tidak sempurna, mekanisme tidak telus, menyebabkan rakyat umum secara普遍产生 "syarikat melampaui kuasa, campur tangan berlebihan terhadap hak milik" kesilapan faham. Pada asalnya, logik kawalan risiko ini seasal dengan fungsi penentuan lokasi anti-pencurian peranti iPhone, mekanisme kunci pagar elektronik, terasnya adalah jaminan dasar keselamatan harta pengguna, selepas pengguna membuat laporan即可解锁.
行业、法律专家：安全策略、用户隐私保护很有必要Beberapa orang pakar industri kenderaan berpengalaman tinggi menyatakan, langkah pengoptimuman pantas Zeekr kali ini, dalam satu tahap memajukan kemajuan sistem kawalan risiko keselamatan industri kenderaan elektrik.
Di zaman kereta pintar, tanggungjawab utama pengeluar kereta jauh tidak terbatas pada keselamatan pengawalan pemacu, tetapi meluas kepada sistem jaminan keselamatan seluruh kawasan: sama ada termasuk kemahiran asas seperti pusingan, brek, kuasa keselamatan pemanduan, juga merangkumi keselamatan anti-pencurian harta kenderaan, keselamatan privasi data peribadi pemilik. Pengoptimuman peraturan kawalan risiko lintas negara Zeekr kali ini, pada asalnya di antara garis dasar pematuhan keselamatan, mekanisme perlindungan harta dan pengalaman pengguna, menemui titik keseimbangan paling optimum, benar-benar menyerahkan kawalan kenderaan kepada pengguna, mencapai "keselamatan tidak hilang, pengalaman tidak berkecil".
Bagi ada pandangan meragui, adakah pengeluar kereta berhak menyekat fungsi kenderaan secara sepihak. Ada peguam menyatakan: kawalan risiko pagar geografis pengeluar kereta hanya menyekat fungsi tambahan seperti hiburan sistem kereta, navigasi, sepanjang proses tidak campur tangan terhadap peralatan utama keselamatan pemanduan seperti pusingan, brek, kuasa. Pemilik menyediakan bahan seperti pasport, bukti pelepasan, bukti pembelian kenderaan selesai pengesahan即可解锁 sekatan, tidak membentuk pelanggaran terhadap hak harta. Sebaliknya, jika pengeluar kereta membiarkan kenderaan keluar luar negara tanpa kawalan, akan berhadapan dengan hukuman administratif kastam yang besar.
Maklum balas sebenar pemilik di hadapan, lebih menyokong keperluan pengoptimuman industri. Banyak pemilik Zeekr dalam wawancara menyatakan, memilih Zeekr, tepat kerana melihat konsep merek keselamatan muktamad. Orang dalam industri tertentu berpendapat, pagar elektronik menyeluruh, mekanisme kawalan risiko lintas negara adalah的配置 keselamatan yang wajib untuk kereta mewah tinggi, dan logik kunci anti-pencurian produk digital pelbagai sama. Nilai kereta mewah tinggi tinggi, ruang keuntungan lintas negara besar, mekanisme kawalan risiko yang sempurna boleh dengan efektif elakkan risiko kenderaan dicuri, dijual secara haram, membolehkan penggunaan kenderaan harian, perjalanan lintas negara jarak jauh lebih selamat, lebih yakin.
争议背后：中国高端新能源全球化的必经进阶Dari sudut trend jangka panjang industri, langkah pengoptimuman pengeluar kereta kali ini, adalah jalan wajib globalisasi kenderaan elektrik tinggi China. Saat ini merek kenderaan elektrik tinggi nasional mempercepat keluar luar negara, perbezaan harga jual yang besar antara dalam dan luar negara membentuk ruang keuntungan besar: Zeekr 009 harga jual dalam negara lebih 400,000 yuan, pasaran Singapura lebih 2 Juta Yuan; Zeekr 9X harga hujung luar negara普遍 naik harga 400,000 yuan, versi pengubahsuaian Mansory harga hujung luar negara mencapai 400,000 USD, setara lebih 2.7 Juta Yuan. Kelebihan harga yang besar ini, menjadikan kereta mewah tinggi nasional sebagai sasaran重点 daripada aktiviti haram lintas negara, pengedar jualan semula haram, pelbagai tindakan jualan semula lintas negara haram, selundupan kenderaan penuh, keuntungan penguraian bahagian terus berluah-luahan.
Seterusnya, laluan lokasi kenderaan, maklumat geografik pengukuran kenderaan adalah data penting undang-undang negara, berdasarkan "Undang-Undang Keselamatan Data", "Peraturan Pengurusan Keselamatan Data Kereta (Percubaan)", "Panduan Keselamatan Pengangkutan Data Kereta (Edisi 2026)", "Undang-Undang Pengukuran", data berkaitan dilarang keras penghantaran lintas negara melanggar peraturan, kawalan risiko pagar geografis adalah tanggungjawab undang-undang pengeluar kereta untuk melaksanakan keselamatan data negara, kerahsiaan pengukuran. Dan 2026 tahun dalam negara melaksanakan sistem pengurusan lesen eksport kenderaan penumpang elektrik penuh, kenderaan tanpa lesen rasmi dilarang keluar luar negara, pengawal risiko pengeluar kereta juga langkah perlu menyokong pengawasan eksport import negara, elakkan risiko kepatuhan. Selain itu, audio visual luar negara sistem kereta, perkhidmatan aliran data merangkumi hak cipta setempat dan peraturan daerah, membuka fungsi tidak teratur juga boleh menyebabkan masalah kepatuhan kepada pemilik.
Dengan keselamatan menyeluruh dikenali sebagai nama Zeekr merek, dipuji oleh pengguna sebagai "Road Zeekr", bukan sahaja dalam struktur badan kenderaan, elak halangan pintar mengejar ketajaman konfigurasi teknologi, juga dalam perlindungan privasi, anti-curi anti-pencurian berjalan di depan industri. Tetapi niat baik yang bagus, juga perlu elakkan seperti "jenis sejuk yang sejuk" perlindungan berlebihan. Kenderaan pada asalnya adalah harta pengguna, strategi keselamatan tidak seharusnya让用户 merasa diganggu.
Perdebatan kali ini dari krisis sensasi umum menjadi peluang peningkatan industri, Zeekr "naik pangkat mendengar nasihat" juga telah memberikan demonstrasi positif untuk seluruh industri: kawalan risiko keselamatan sebenarnya bukan ikatan yang berlebihan, tetapi dasar core dan infrastruktur wajib globalisasi merek kereta China. Masa hadapan,随着 kenderaan elektrik tinggi nasional secara mendalam menggali Asia Tenggara, Timur Tengah, Singapura dan pasaran luar negara lain, industri pasti merujuk pada paradigma pengoptimuman kali ini, menyatukan dan sempurna "dasar kawalan risiko + autonomia pengguna + buka kunci mudah" sistem piawaian.
Melihat ke belakang tahun lalu, Zeekr langkah demi langkah mengubah suara pengguna menjadi penggerak evolusi merek. Dari menentang masalah terlalu pantas irama model perubahan, jelas "perubahan model perlu diberitahu terlebih dahulu dan setahun tidak melebihi sekali", hingga melancarkan "Zeekr Jarak Sifar" mekanisme komunikasi, mengeluarkan "Konvensyen Perkhidmatan Cerah" — setiap langkah di sebalik, adalah keikhlasan menyerahkan kuasa suara kepada pengguna. Tepat ini tidak mengelak, tidak menuduh jujur komunikasi, menjadikan Zeekr merek nilai cadangan pengguna (NPS) meningkat besar, di pasaran membentuk kesan maklumat lisan yang kuat. Separuh tahun pertama ini, Zeekr secara kumulatif serahan 178,370 buah, kenaikan tahunan 97%, menjadi dalam merek baharu satu-satunya yang lengkap sasaran jualan tahunan separuh. Pengiktirafan pasaran, adalah balasan yang terbaik.
在马来西亚的SUV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Mercedes-Benz Maybach GLS 和 Land Rover Range Rover Sport 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Mercedes-Benz Maybach GLS 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 1,918,888 - 1,918,888，一共有 1 个版本，包括 Standard（RM 1,918,888） 等。
Land Rover Range Rover Sport 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 1,698,000 - 2,500,000，一共有 1 个版本，包括 Standard（RM 1,698,000） 等。
从价钱来看，Land Rover Range Rover Sport 的起步价比 Mercedes-Benz Maybach GLS 便宜了 RM 220,888。老实讲，在这个价位段，几千块的差距其实不算大，关键还是看整体的性价比和长期使用成本。
Mercedes-Benz Maybach GLS 搭载 3.0L Turbo，马力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
Land Rover Range Rover Sport 搭载 3.0L Turbo，马力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
两款车用的是同一套动力系统，日常开起来的感受基本没有差别。油耗方面也差不多，不用太纠结这一点。
Mercedes-Benz Maybach GLS 的安全评级是 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Premium ADAS。
Land Rover Range Rover Sport 的安全评级是 TBD，主动安全系统包括 Basic。
安全配备方面，两款车都拿到了不错的评级。不过 Mercedes-Benz Maybach GLS 的 Premium ADAS 和 Land Rover Range Rover Sport 的 Basic 在功能上有些差异，如果你比较看重主动安全的话，可以仔细对比一下两者的功能列表。
Mercedes-Benz Maybach GLS 保修 3年/100,000km，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
Land Rover Range Rover Sport 保修 3年/100,000km，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
两款车的保修条件一样，这方面不用纠结。实际保养成本还要看品牌的服务网络和零件价格，建议去车友群问问真实车主的经验。
Mercedes-Benz Maybach GLS 和 Land Rover Range Rover Sport 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择，适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价，可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款；如果你更在意性价比和配备，那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾，亲身体验才是最重要的。
总的来说，Mercedes-Benz Maybach GLS 和 Land Rover Range Rover Sport 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
在马来西亚的SUV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Mercedes-Benz GLC 和 Land Rover Discovery Sport 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Mercedes-Benz GLC 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 336,888 - 336,888，一共有 2 个版本，包括 GLC 200（RM 290,000）、GLC 300（RM 340,000） 等。
Land Rover Discovery Sport 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 499,800 - 499,800，一共有 1 个版本，包括 Standard（RM 499,800） 等。
从价钱来看，Mercedes-Benz GLC 的起步价确实比 Land Rover Discovery Sport 便宜了 RM 162,912。如果你预算有限，Mercedes-Benz 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意，便宜的那几千块，可能在配备上会有取舍，具体要看你的需求。
Mercedes-Benz GLC 搭载 2.0L Turbo，马力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
Land Rover Discovery Sport 搭载 3.0L Turbo，马力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
动力方面，Land Rover Discovery Sport 的 3.0L Turbo 比 Mercedes-Benz GLC 的 2.0L Turbo 多了 130 匹马力。不过日常在市区开，两款车的动力都够用，不会觉得不够力。
Mercedes-Benz GLC 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
Land Rover Discovery Sport 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
两款车的尺寸几乎一样，车内空间差别不大。这个级别的车，日常使用完全够用。
Mercedes-Benz GLC 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Land Rover Discovery Sport 采用 4WD 驱动方式。
Mercedes-Benz 的 FWD 和 Land Rover 的 4WD 在操控上会有不同感受，建议试驾对比。
Mercedes-Benz GLC 和 Land Rover Discovery Sport 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择，适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价，可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款；如果你更在意性价比和配备，那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾，亲身体验才是最重要的。
总的来说，Mercedes-Benz GLC 和 Land Rover Discovery Sport 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
在马来西亚的SUV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Mercedes-Benz GLA 和 Land Rover Discovery Sport 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 258,888 - 295,888，一共有 1 个版本，包括 Standard（RM 258,888） 等。
Land Rover Discovery Sport 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 499,800 - 499,800，一共有 1 个版本，包括 Standard（RM 499,800） 等。
从价钱来看，Mercedes-Benz GLA 的起步价确实比 Land Rover Discovery Sport 便宜了 RM 240,912。如果你预算有限，Mercedes-Benz 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意，便宜的那几千块，可能在配备上会有取舍，具体要看你的需求。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 搭载 2.0L Turbo，马力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
Land Rover Discovery Sport 搭载 3.0L Turbo，马力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
动力方面，Land Rover Discovery Sport 的 3.0L Turbo 比 Mercedes-Benz GLA 的 2.0L Turbo 多了 130 匹马力。不过日常在市区开，两款车的动力都够用，不会觉得不够力。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 的安全评级是 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Premium ADAS。
Land Rover Discovery Sport 的安全评级是 TBD，主动安全系统包括 Basic。
安全配备方面，两款车都拿到了不错的评级。不过 Mercedes-Benz GLA 的 Premium ADAS 和 Land Rover Discovery Sport 的 Basic 在功能上有些差异，如果你比较看重主动安全的话，可以仔细对比一下两者的功能列表。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
Land Rover Discovery Sport 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
两款车的尺寸几乎一样，车内空间差别不大。这个级别的车，日常使用完全够用。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 和 Land Rover Discovery Sport 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择，适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价，可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款；如果你更在意性价比和配备，那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾，亲身体验才是最重要的。
总的来说，Mercedes-Benz GLA 和 Land Rover Discovery Sport 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
車款概覽
奧迪 A3 抵唔抵買，關鍵唔係佢睇落有多吸引，而係佢係咪能解決你嘅實際用車需求。這篇文章會把重點放喺乘坐空間、行李安放同家人舒適度。
售價落喺 RM 340,112，買家可以先用佢判斷預算壓力同同級定位。
買車價錢指南
奧迪 A3 嘅買車預算可以先從 RM 340,112 開始衡量。呢個數字真正影響嘅係月供、保險同現金流，而不單止係展廳入面嘅標價。
如果你喺幾個版本之間猶豫，可以把 2025 2.0T S line（RM 340,112） 放喺同一張清單入面比較。日常通勤買家優先睇舒適同安全，常跑高速嘅買家則更要重視動力、輔助駕駛同車廂方便。
核心數據匯總
睇奧迪 A3 嘅核心規格，最重要係把數字轉化做生活入面嘅感受。
渦輪增壓、4 缸嘅動力底子，適合拿來判斷市區跟車同高速巡航係咪輕鬆。 190 PS、320 N·m嘅輸出，真正意義在於滿載、爬坡同超車時唔會太吃力。 6.2 L/100km 嘅油耗，對每日通勤嘅人來講會直接影響加油頻率。 車長 4495 mm、車寬 1816 mm、車高 1425 mm、軸距 2636 mm，可以幫你預判泊車難度同後排乘坐空間。
優缺點分析
奧迪 A3 嘅優點唔必誇張，真正有價值嘅係佢係咪能令日常使用更省心：預算位置清晰，方便同級車直接比較、日常能源成本有明確參考、動力輸出能支撐高速同超車需求。
需要留意嘅係，市區泊車同狹窄路段仍要看個人駕駛習慣。這些唔係扣分項，而係落訂之前應該諗清楚嘅生活細節。
買車常見問題解答
購買奧迪 A3 前，買家最常問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢係咪能融入自己嘅生活。
呢輛車啱邊個？啱把乘坐空間、行李安放同家人舒適度放喺首位嘅買家。 家庭用戶要看啲咩？優先看後排乘坐、兒童座椅、行李同日常上下車係咪順手。 每日開會唔會麻煩？6.2 L/100km 嘅油耗參考讓通勤成本更容易預估。
競爭對手比較內容
把奧迪 A3 放進同級車名單時，唔建議只看品牌或外形。真正有用嘅比較順序係：先用 RM 340,112 鎖定預算範圍、再看動力係咪足夠應付高速同滿載、接着比較能源成本同補能方便、最後看空間係咪適合家人同行李。
這樣篩選出嚟嘅結果更貼近日常生活。你會更清楚佢係適合城市通勤、家庭代步、長途巡航，定係更適合作為一輛講求個性嘅選擇。
用車全週期指南
擁有奧迪 A3 嘅日常成本，最直接會反映喺油費、保險、輪胎同定期保養上。6.2 L/100km 嘅油耗讓通勤預算更容易掌握。
如果你常跑南北大道，動力同車廂舒適度會比單純低價更重要；如果主要喺市區，泊車靈活性、視野同低速平順度會更影響心情。
車型概覽
Audi RS 4 值唔值得買，關鍵唔係佢睇落幾吸引，而係佢係咪可以解決你嘅真實用車需求。呢篇文章會將重點放喺落單前最容易忽略嘅問題。
版本方面，Audi RS 4 目前可圍繞 2025 Avant quattro 嚟比較。
買車價格指南
評估 Audi RS 4 嘅買車預算時，建議先由版本定位同後續用車成本入手。價格唔係唯一重點，真正決定係唔係抵嘅係每日有無用到嗰啲配備。
如果你喺幾個版本之間猶疑，可以把 2025 Avant quattro 放喺同一份清單入面比較。日常通勤嘅買家優先睇舒適與安全，常跑高速嘅買家則更應重視動力、輔助駕駛同座艙方便。
核心參數彙總
睇 Audi RS 4 嘅核心規格，最重要係將數字變做生活感受。
Audi RS 4 嘅核心价值應基於日常場景判斷：你要佢負責通勤、家庭出行、長途，定係作為更有個性嘅選擇。
優點缺點分析
Audi RS 4 嘅優點唔使誇張，真正有價值嘅係佢係咪令日常使用更省心：車型定位清楚，適合先作為同級比較對象。
需要留意嘅係，最終取捨會落喺版本配備、保險同長期保養成本。呢啲唔係扣分項，而係落單前應該先諗清楚嘅生活細節。
買車常見問題解答
買 Audi RS 4 前，買家最常問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢係咪能夠融入自己嘅生活。
呢架車適合邊個？適合將落單前最容易忽略嘅問題放喺首位嘅買家。家庭用戶要看咩？優先睇後排乘坐、兒童座椅、行李同日常上下車係唔順手。每日開車會唔會麻煩？如果能源成本、停車便利同版本配備都符合你嘅生活節奏，佢就會比較容易相處。
競爭對手對比內容
將 Audi RS 4 放喺同級車名單時，唔建議只睇品牌或外形。真正有用嘅比較順序係：先從版本定位、品牌售後同日常用途開始比較。
咁樣篩選出嚟嘅結果更貼近日常生活。你就會更清楚佢係適合城市通勤、家庭代步、長途巡航，定係更適合作為一輛講求個性嘅選擇。
用車全週期指南
擁有 Audi RS 4 嘅重點，係確認保險、路稅、保養同輪胎成本都在可接受範圍內。買車唔係一次付款就結束，而係每日都要相處。
如果你常跑南北大道，動力同座艙舒適度會比單純低價更重要；如果主要喺市區，停車靈活性、視野同低速順滑度會更影響心情。
車型概覽
Aston Martin DB11 抵唔抵買，關鍵唔係佢外觀幾吸引，而係佢有無解決你嘅真實用車需求。呢篇文章會將重點放喺版本之間嘅取捨。
版本方面，Aston Martin DB11 而家可以圍繞 2025 Standard 嚟比較。
購車價格指南
評估 Aston Martin DB11 嘅購車預算時，建議先從版本定位同埋後續擁車成本下手。價格唔係唯一重點，真正決定係咪划算係每日用唔用到嗰啲配置。
如果你喺幾個版本之間猶豫，可以把 2025 Standard 放喺同一張清單入面比較。日常通勤買家優先睇舒適同安全，常跑高速嘅買家則更應重視動力、輔助駕駛同座艙方便。
核心參數匯總
睇 Aston Martin DB11 嘅核心規格，最重要係把數字轉譯成生活入面嘅感受。
Aston Martin DB11 嘅核心價值應回嚟日常場景判斷：你要佢負責通勤、家庭出行、長途，定係作為更有個性嘅選擇。
優缺點分析
Aston Martin DB11 嘅優點唔使誇張，真正有價值係佢有無令日常使用更省心：車型定位清楚，適合先作為同級比較對象。
需要留意嘅係，最終取捨會落喺版本配置、保險同長期保養成本。呢啲唔係扣分項，而係落單前應該先諗清楚嘅生活細節。
購車常見問題解答
購買 Aston Martin DB11 前，買家最常問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢有無融入自己嘅生活。
呢架車適合邊個？適合把版本之間取捨放喺第一位嘅買家。 家庭用戶要睇咩？優先睇後排乘坐、兒童座椅、行李同日常上下車有無順手。 日日開有無麻煩？如果能源成本、停車方便同版本配置都符合你嘅生活節奏，佢會比較容易相處。
競爭對手對比內容
把 Aston Martin DB11 放進同級車名單時，唔建議只睇品牌或外形。真正有用嘅比較順序係：先從版本定位、品牌同日常用途開始比較。
咁樣篩選出來嘅結果更貼近日常生活。你會更清楚佢係適合城市通勤、家庭代步、長途巡航，定係更適合作為一輛講求個性嘅選擇。
用車全週期指南
擁有 Aston Martin DB11 嘅重點，係確認保險、路稅、保養同輪胎成本都喺可接受範圍內。買車唔係一次付款完結，而係日日都要相處。
如果你常跑南北大道，動力同座艙舒適度會比單純低價更重要；如果主要喺市區，停車靈活性、視野同低速順暢度會更影響心情。
車型概覽
買 Perodua Traz 值唔值得，關鍵唔係佢睇落幾吸引，而係佢夠唔夠解決你嘅真實用車需要。呢篇文章會集中放喺佢同級別車比較嘅生活適應程度。最近圍繞呢款車嘅討論包括「KLIMS 2026: Perodua Traz and the National Brand's SUV Foundation」，反映喺本地買家視野入面仍然有關注度。
價格範圍喺 RM 76,100 - 82,000，買家可以先用佢判斷預算壓力同同級定位。
購車價格指南
Perodua Traz 嘅購車預算可以先由 RM 76,100 - 82,000 開始衡量。呢個數字真正影響嘅係月供、保險同現金流，而不係只係展廳入面嘅標價。
如果你喺幾個版本之間猶豫，可以把 2026 1.5L H 2T（RM 82,000）、2026 1.5L H（RM 81,100）、2026 1.5L X（RM 76,100） 放喺同一張清單入面比較。日常通勤買家優先睇舒適同安全，常跑高速嘅買家則更應重視動力、輔助駕駛同座艙方便。
核心參數匯總
睇 Perodua Traz 嘅核心規格，最重要係將數字翻譯成生活入面嘅感受。
自然進氣、4 缸嘅動力底子，適合拿來判斷市區跟車同高速巡航是否輕鬆。106 Ps、138 N·m嘅輸出，真正意義在於滿載、爬坡同超車時唔會太吃力。4.69 L/100km嘅油耗，對於每天通勤嘅人嚟講會直接影響加油頻率。車長 4310 mm、車寬 1770 mm、車高 1655 mm、軸距 2620 mm，可以幫你預判停車難度同後排乘坐空間。
優缺點分析
Perodua Traz 嘅優點唔使誇張，真正有價值嘅係佢夠唔夠讓日常使用更加少操心：預算位置清楚，方便同級別車直接比較、日常能源成本有明確參考、動力輸出能支撐高速同超車需要。
需要留意嘅係，市區停車同狹窄路段仍然睇個人駕駛習慣。呢啲唔係扣分項，而係落訂之前應該先諗清楚嘅生活細節。
購車常見問題解答
購買 Perodua Traz 之前，買家最常問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢夠唔夠融入自己嘅生活。
呢輛車適合邊個？適合把佢同級別車相比嘅生活適應程度放喺首位嘅買家。家庭用戶要看咩？優先睇後排乘坐、兒童座椅、行李同日常上下車是否順手。每天開會唔會麻煩？4.69 L/100km嘅油耗參考讓通勤成本更加容易預估。
競爭對手比較內容
把 Perodua Traz 放進同級別車名單嘅時候，唔建議只睇品牌或外形。真正有用嘅比較順序係：先用 RM 76,100 - 82,000 鎖定預算圈、再睇動力夠唔夠應付高速同滿載、跟住比較能源成本同補能方便、最後睇空間是否適合家人同行李。
咁樣篩選出嚟嘅結果更加貼近日常生活。你會更清楚佢係適合城市通勤、家庭代步、長途巡航，定係更適合作為一輛講求個性嘅選擇。
用車全週期指南
擁有 Perodua Traz 嘅日常成本，最直接會反映喺燃油、保險、輪胎同定期保養上。4.69 L/100km嘅油耗讓通勤預算更加容易掌握。
如果你常跑南北大道，動力同座艙舒適度會比單純低價更重要；如果主要喺市區，停車靈活性、視野同低速順滑度會更加影響心情。
© 2024 Bitauto.com. All Rights Reserved.
Bitauto (www.yiche.com and www.bitauto.com) is one of the most visited automotive websites in China. We provide detailed info on Chinese car brands available in your area. Please note that the information provided on this website is based on publicly available data and is for reference only. It may not be fully updated or accurate at all times.
Help us improve our website
