HomeArchitecture
Search History
Popular Searches
Dealer Login / Sign Up
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-3 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
Mazda CX-3 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 126,159 - 139,159，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2023 2.0L High（RM 139,159）、2023 2.0L Plus（RM 126,159） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X90 嘅起步價確實比 Mazda CX-3 平咗 RM 19,359。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都係要小心，平嗰幾千蚊，喺配備上可能會有所取舍，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Proton X90 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Mazda CX-3 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩款車用咗同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感受基本無乜分別。油耗方面都差不多，唔使太糾結呢一點。
Proton X90 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
Mazda CX-3 車身長 4500 mm，後備箱 450 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-3 嘅車身比 Proton X90 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Proton X90 喺城市入面停車會靈活少少，各有取舍。
Proton X90 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mazda CX-3 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有大分別。
Proton X90 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-3 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問問真實車主嘅經驗。
總嘅嚟講，Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-3 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再上去試車做最終決定。買車係件大事情，花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X90 and Toyota Yaris Cross when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, let's do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X90's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
Toyota Yaris Cross's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 99,900 - 109,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Standard (RM 99,900), 2026 HEV 1.5L Standard (RM 109,900), etc.
From a price perspective, Toyota Yaris Cross's starting price is RM 6,900 cheaper than Proton X90. To be honest, in this price range, a difference of a few thousand isn't really that big. The key is still looking at overall value for money and long-term usage costs.
Proton X90's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Toyota Yaris Cross's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include TSS.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive within this class. New cars nowadays generally have good safety, so there's no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X90 adopts FWD drive method.
Toyota Yaris Cross adopts FWD drive method.
Both cars have the same drive method, both are FWD, and daily driving feel won't differ too much.
Both Proton X90 and Toyota Yaris Cross are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Finally, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X90 and Toyota Yaris Cross are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big thing, spending some time doing research will never go wrong.
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Subaru Crosstrek when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of Subaru Crosstrek in Malaysia is RM 145,000 - 160,000, with a total of 1 version, including 2.0L e-Boxer (RM 150,000), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 38,200 cheaper than Subaru Crosstrek. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, also note that the savings of a few thousand may involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Subaru Crosstrek is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, so the driving feel is basically the same in daily use. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this point.
The safety rating of Proton X70 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of Subaru Crosstrek is 5★ (Euro NCAP), active safety system includes EyeSight.
In terms of safety features, both cars received good ratings. However, there are some differences in functionality between Proton X70's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Subaru Crosstrek's EyeSight. If you value active safety more, you can compare the feature lists of both.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Subaru Crosstrek body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of the two cars are almost the same, and the interior space difference is not significant. For this class of cars, daily use is fully sufficient.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Subaru Crosstrek warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, both Proton X70 and Subaru Crosstrek are excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, and then take a test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, spending time doing research is never wrong.
Pada pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli membandingkan Proton X70 dan Volkswagen Tiguan semasa memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kereta ini mempunyai harga dan kedudukan yang sangat hampir, hari ini kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat penyelidikan.
Harga OTR Proton X70 di Malaysia ialah RM 106,800 - 122,300, terdapat keseluruhan 3 varian, termasuk 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Volkswagen Tiguan di Malaysia ialah RM 206,540 - 260,024, terdapat keseluruhan 2 varian, termasuk 2025 Allspace 2.0T R-Line (RM 260,024), 2025 Allspace 1.4T Elegance (RM 206,540) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X70 memang lebih murah RM 99,740 berbanding Volkswagen Tiguan. Jika bajet anda terhad, varian permulaan Proton sudah dapat memenuhi keperluan harian. Namun, berhati-hatilah, berbeza beribu-ribu ringgit itu mungkin ada perbezaan pada kelengkapan, bergantung kepada keperluan anda.
Penilaian keselamatan Proton X70 ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Penilaian keselamatan Volkswagen Tiguan ialah 5★ (Euro NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk IQ.Drive.
Dari segi peralatan keselamatan, kedua-dua kereta mendapat penilaian yang baik. Namun, ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) pada Proton X70 dan IQ.Drive pada Volkswagen Tiguan mempunyai beberapa perbezaan dari segi fungsi. Jika anda lebih mengutamakan keselamatan aktif, anda boleh membandingkan senarai fungsi kedua-duanya dengan teliti.
Panjang keseluruhan Proton X70 ialah 4400 mm, kapasiti bagasi 400 L.
Panjang keseluruhan Volkswagen Tiguan ialah 4400 mm, kapasiti bagasi 400 L.
Dimensi kedua-dua kereta hampir sama, ruang dalaman tidak terlalu berbeza. Untuk kereta pada tahap ini, cukup untuk penggunaan harian.
Proton X70 waranti 5 tahun/150,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Volkswagen Tiguan waranti 3 tahun/100,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Secara keseluruhannya, Proton X70 dan Volkswagen Tiguan adalah model kereta yang sangat bagus di pasaran Malaysia. Untuk memilih mana satu, penting untuk melihat keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Kami mengesyorkan anda membuat kajian, bandingkan beberapa harga daripada dealer kereta, kemudian buat ujian jalan raya untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara penting, meluangkan masa untuk membuat kajian tidak akan salah.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿寶騰 X70 同福斯 Tiguan 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都蠻接近嘅，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省省做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
福斯 Tiguan 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 206,540 - 260,024，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 Allspace 2.0T R-Line（RM 260,024）、2025 Allspace 1.4T Elegance（RM 206,540） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，寶騰 X70 嘅起步價確實比福斯 Tiguan 平咗 RM 99,740。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意，便宜嗰幾千塊，喺配備上可能會有取舍，具體睇返你嘅需求。
寶騰 X70 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
福斯 Tiguan 搭載 2.0L 4 缸，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，福斯 Tiguan 嘅 2.0L 4 缸比寶騰 X70 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
寶騰 X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
福斯 Tiguan 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 IQ.Drive。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到咗唔錯嘅評級。不過寶騰 X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同福斯 Tiguan 嘅 IQ.Drive 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
寶騰 X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
福斯 Tiguan 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。
總體嚟講，寶騰 X70 同福斯 Tiguan 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Ativa and Honda WR-V when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price for Perodua Ativa in Malaysia is RM 62,500 - 73,400, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400), etc.
The OTR price for Honda WR-V in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Perodua Ativa is indeed RM 27,400 cheaper than Honda WR-V. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the price difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Ativa is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl engine, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.
Honda WR-V is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl engine, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, the driving experience is basically the same daily. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this.
Perodua Ativa's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA.
Honda WR-V's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features in this class are quite comprehensive. New cars nowadays generally don't lack safety, no need to worry too much about this.
Perodua Ativa warranty is 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda WR-V warranty is 5 years/unlimited mileage, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Perodua Ativa and Honda WR-V are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about price-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Finally, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
In general, Perodua Ativa and Honda WR-V are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not go wrong.
Dalam pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli semasa memilih kereta akan membandingkan Proton X70 dan Chery Tiggo 9. Kedua-dua kereta ini agak dekat dari segi harga dan sasaran pasaran. Hari ini, kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa melakukan kajian.
Proton X70 di Malaysia mempunyai harga OTR RM 106,800 - 122,300, terdapat keseluruhan 3 varian, termasuk 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300) dan lain-lain.
Chery Tiggo 9 di Malaysia mempunyai harga OTR RM 166,800 - 179,800, terdapat keseluruhan 1 varian, termasuk 2026 2.0T Standard (RM 179,750) dan lain-lain.
Daripada segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X70 memang lebih murah RM 60,000 berbanding Chery Tiggo 9. Jika bajet anda terhad, varian asas Proton sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Tetapi anda perlu mengambil kira, perbezaan harga beberapa ribu itu mungkin melibatkan kompromi dari segi kelengkapan, bergantung kepada keperluan anda.
Proton X70 dilengkapi enjin 1.5L Turbo, kuasa 140 hp. Penggunaan minyak rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 9 dilengkapi enjin 2.0L 4-silinder, kuasa 170 hp. Penggunaan minyak rasmi 8.0 L/100km.
Daripada segi kuasa, enjin 2.0L 4-silinder Chery Tiggo 9 mempunyai 30 kuasa kuda lebih daripada 1.5L Turbo Proton X70. Tetapi untuk kegunaan harian di bandar, kuasa kedua-dua kereta sudah mencukupi dan tidak akan terasa kurang tenaga.
Proton X70 panjang badan 4400 mm, ruang muatan 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 9 panjang badan 4400 mm, ruang muatan 400 L.
Saiz kedua-dua kereta hampir sama, ruang dalam kereta tidak terlalu berbeza. Kereta dalam kategori ini sudah cukup untuk kegunaan harian.
Proton X70 menggunakan sistem pemacu FWD.
Chery Tiggo 9 menggunakan sistem pemacu FWD.
Sistem pemacu kedua-dua kereta sama, kedua-duanya FWD, pengalaman memandu harian tidak akan terlalu berbeza.
Proton X70 dan Chery Tiggo 9 adalah pilihan utama di pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga dan pengangkutan harian. Jika anda lebih mementingkan reputasi jenama dan harga kenderaan terpakai, anda boleh lebih memprioritaskan model dengan reputasi lebih baik; Jika anda lebih mementingkan nilai harga dan kelengkapan, maka pilih model yang lebih lengkap. Akhir sekali, disarankan untuk memandu kedua-dua model, pengalaman sendiri adalah yang paling penting.
Secara keseluruhan, Proton X70 dan Chery Tiggo 9 adalah model yang sangat bagus di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih mana satu, kuncinya masih bergantung kepada keperluan peribadi dan bajet anda. Kami cadangkan anda membuat kajian yang baik, bandingkan beberapa tawaran dari pusat jualan kereta yang berbeza, baru pergi uji jalan untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa untuk kajian tidak akan pernah salah.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Ativa and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Ativa's OTR selling price in Malaysia is RM 62,500 - 73,400, totaling 3 versions, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400) etc.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro's OTR selling price in Malaysia is RM 123,750 - 123,750, totaling 2 versions, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 125,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 140,000) etc.
From the price perspective, Perodua Ativa's starting price is indeed RM 61,250 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 7 Pro. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware that the few thousand dollars cheaper might have trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Perodua Ativa is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, horsepower 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Chery Tiggo 7 Pro's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Perodua Ativa's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel it lacks power.
Perodua Ativa body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not big. Cars in this level are completely sufficient for daily use.
Perodua Ativa adopts FWD drive mode.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not differ too much.
Perodua Ativa and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use, daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Ativa and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose, key still depends on your personal needs and budget. Everyone is advised to do research well, compare quotes from several car dealerships, then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will definitely not be a mistake.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Ativa and Mitsubishi Xforce when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Ativa's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 62,500 - 73,400, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400), etc.
Mitsubishi Xforce's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 109,930 - 119,930, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Ultimate (RM 119,930), 2026 1.5L Urban (RM 109,930), etc.
In terms of price, Perodua Ativa's starting price is indeed RM 47,430 cheaper than Mitsubishi Xforce. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, be aware that the cheaper few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Ativa body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mitsubishi Xforce body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, and the interior space difference is not significant. For a car at this level, it is fully sufficient for daily use.
Perodua Ativa warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mitsubishi Xforce warranty 3 years/100,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Perodua Ativa and Mitsubishi Xforce are both mainstream choices in the Malaysia market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with more configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Ativa and Mitsubishi Xforce are both very good car models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research is never wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 9 when choosing a car. Both vehicles are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300. There are 3 versions in total, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of Chery Tiggo 9 in Malaysia is RM 166,800 - 179,800. There is 1 version in total, including 2026 2.0T Standard (RM 179,750), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of the Proton X70 is indeed RM 60,000 cheaper than the Chery Tiggo 9. If your budget is limited, the entry-level version of Proton can already meet daily needs. However, you should also note that the price saving of a few thousand ringgit may involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.
The Proton X70 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The Chery Tiggo 9 safety rating is TBD, active safety system includes Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, the ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) of the Proton X70 and the Basic of the Chery Tiggo 9 have some differences in functionality. If you value active safety, you can compare their feature lists in detail.
The Proton X70 uses FWD drive configuration.
The Chery Tiggo 9 uses FWD drive configuration.
Both cars have the same drive configuration, both are FWD, so there won't be a big difference in daily driving experience.
Both the Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 9 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both models; experiencing them personally is the most important.
Overall, the Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 9 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and then going for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major matter; spending time on research is never a mistake.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好唔少買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 寶路達阿魯斯 同 寶騰 X90 來做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都蠻接近嘅，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
寶路達阿魯斯 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，總共 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等。
寶騰 X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，總共 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
從價錢睇落去，寶路達阿魯斯 嘅起步價確實比 寶騰 X90 平咗 RM 33,900。如果你預算有限，寶路達 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，喺配備上可能有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
寶路達阿魯斯 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
寶騰 X90 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，寶騰 X90 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 寶路達阿魯斯 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
寶路達阿魯斯 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
寶騰 X90 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算畀得好齊全啦。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心這一點。
寶路達阿魯斯 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
寶騰 X90 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
寶路達阿魯斯 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
寶騰 X90 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問下真實車主嘅經驗。
總體嚟講，寶路達阿魯斯 同 寶騰 X90 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Proton X70 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite similar in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price for Perodua Aruz in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900. There are 2 versions in total, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
The OTR price for Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300. There are 3 versions in total, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Looking at the price, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 33,900 cheaper than Proton X70. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. But be aware, that few thousand difference might involve trade-offs in equipment, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz comes with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.
Proton X70 comes with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, and you won't feel like there is not enough power.
Perodua Aruz body length is 4400 mm, trunk is 400 L.
Proton X70 body length is 4400 mm, trunk is 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. For cars in this class, daily use is fully sufficient.
Perodua Aruz uses FWD drive mode.
Proton X70 uses FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, and there won't be much difference in daily driving experience.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Proton X70 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will definitely not be a mistake.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Proton X90 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
Perodua Aruz has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Proton X90 has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
From a price perspective, the entry price of Perodua Aruz is indeed RM 33,900 cheaper than Proton X90. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note also, that few thousand difference, there may be trade-offs in equipment, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.
Proton X90 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New cars nowadays have decent safety, no need to worry too much about this.
Perodua Aruz adopts FWD drive mode.
Proton X90 adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, daily driving feel will not differ too much.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X90 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, no need to worry about this. Actual maintenance cost depends on the brand's service network and parts prices, suggest asking real owners in car owner groups for experience.
Perodua Aruz and Proton X90 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysia market, suitable for family use, daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately suggest test driving both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Proton X90 are both very good car models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose, the key is still your personal needs and budget. Suggest everyone do research, compare quotes from several dealerships, then test drive to make final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will definitely not be wrong.
唔誇張噉講，喺曼谷街頭，V23 嘅能見度，甚至仲比我老家淄博咁高，每日起碼睇到唔少於 10 台..
泰國市場嘅 V23，大部分係兩驅低配，普遍係 70 至 80 萬泰銖，同國內市場都唔算貴幾多。喺一台 A0 級純電車都要賣到 60 萬泰銖以上嘅泰國市場，V23 嘅性價比係唔低。今年上半年，V23 亦拿下咗泰國「方盒子」細分市場嘅第一名。
國產車企搵到更高利潤，外國消費者得到更好嘅選擇，雙贏。
奇瑞 7 月份嘅銷量數據，亦側面印證咗呢個趨勢——整個奇瑞集團，7 月賣咗 27.68 萬輛產品，其中海外銷量佔咗 20.25 萬輛，佔比超過 73%。而國內市場，只賣咗 7 萬幾輛。喺自主品牌喺國內市場價格戰此起彼伏、內捲不斷加劇嘅當下，奇瑞帶住旗下子品牌，走出咗一條全新嘅增長曲線。
國內保規模、守陣地；海外賺利潤、樹品牌。呢種結構性優勢，係面對國內市場內捲嘅最優解。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Mazda CX-3 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite similar in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time doing research.
Perodua Aruz in Malaysia has an OTR price of RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Mazda CX-3 in Malaysia has an OTR price of RM 126,159 - 139,159, with a total of 2 versions, including 2023 2.0L High (RM 139,159), 2023 2.0L Plus (RM 126,159), etc.
From the price perspective, the Perodua Aruz starting price is indeed RM 53,259 cheaper than the Mazda CX-3. If your budget is limited, the Perodua entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, be aware that the few thousand cheaper amount might have trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include .
Mazda CX-3 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include i-Activsense.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features in this class are considered quite comprehensive. New car safety nowadays is not poor, no need to worry too much about this.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-3 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, no need to worry about this aspect. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and parts prices, recommended to ask real owners in car owner groups for experience.
Perodua Aruz and Mazda CX-3 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Mazda CX-3 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. Everyone is advised to do their research, compare quotes from several dealerships, then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time on research.
Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 123,750 - 123,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 125,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 140,000), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 16,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 7 Pro. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note that the few thousand cheaper might have trade-offs on features, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, the driving experience is basically the same. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to fuss too much about this.
Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro's safety rating is TBD, active safety system includes Basic.
In terms of safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, there are some differences in function between Proton X70's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro's Basic. If you value active safety, you can compare the function lists of both.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro warranty 3 years/100,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will never go wrong.
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Mitsubishi Xforce when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Mitsubishi Xforce OTR price in Malaysia is RM 109,930 - 119,930, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Ultimate (RM 119,930), 2026 1.5L Urban (RM 109,930), etc.
In terms of price, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 37,030 cheaper than Mitsubishi Xforce. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. However, also note that the few thousand difference in price may involve trade-offs in equipment, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz features 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Mitsubishi Xforce features 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Mitsubishi Xforce's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel it lacks power.
Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.
Mitsubishi Xforce safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include MI-PILOT.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New cars nowadays do not have poor safety, no need to worry too much about this.
Perodua Aruz adopts FWD drive method.
Mitsubishi Xforce adopts FWD drive method.
Both cars have the same drive method, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not differ too much.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Mitsubishi Xforce are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a major decision, spending time doing research will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Mazda CX-30 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Mazda CX-30's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 122,409 - 146,409, with a total of 4 versions, including 2025 2.0L High+ Premium (RM 146,409), 2025 2.0L High+ (RM 138,409), 2025 2.0L High (RM 130,409), etc.
From a price perspective, Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 15,609 cheaper than Mazda CX-30. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand cheaper might have trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.
Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-30's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include i-Activsense.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive at this level. New car safety is generally good nowadays, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mazda CX-30 body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, Mazda CX-30's body is 100 mm longer than Proton X70, offering an advantage in seating space. However, Proton X70 is more flexible for parking in the city, each has trade-offs.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-30 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Warranty conditions for both cars are the same, no need to worry about this aspect. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and parts prices, suggest asking real owners in car owner groups for experience.
Overall, Proton X70 and Mazda CX-30 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, compare quotes from several car dealers, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, spending time doing research will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會將 Perodua Aruz 同 Kia Sportage 做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做個詳細比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900）等。
Kia Sportage 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,639 - 179,320，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High（RM 179,320）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High（RM 159,320）、2025 2.0L AT 2WD High（RM 139,639）等。
由價錢嚟睇，Perodua Aruz 嘅起步價真係比 Kia Sportage 平咗 RM 56,739。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以應付日常需要。但都要注意，平嘅幾千塊，可能會喺配備上有取舍，具體就要睇你嘅需要。
Perodua Aruz 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Kia Sportage 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Kia Sportage 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Perodua Aruz 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都足夠，唔會覺得無力。
Perodua Aruz 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括。
Kia Sportage 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Drive Wise。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級距入面安全配備都算給得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心這一點。
Perodua Aruz 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Kia Sportage 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。
總體嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Kia Sportage 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊部，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再試車先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
In 2026, China's intelligent automotive industry is undergoing a deep transformation from feature stacking to experience definition. The key benchmark for measuring its success lies in whether an interactive relationship beyond command input and with richer emotional temperature can be established between humans and vehicles. Whether it is human-machine interaction inside the cockpit or environmental communication outside the cockpit, the implementation of experience ultimately points to the same physical carrier: light.
When intelligent vehicles attempt to establish more natural and efficient communication between humans and machines, optoelectronic systems upgrade from traditional auxiliary components to core requirements that determine the upper limit of experience.
The direct projection of this change is reflected in two key points of two-way communication between humans and vehicles: one is the display interface where the vehicle conveys information to humans, and the other is the light-shadow projection interface where the vehicle expresses intent to the outside world. For the former, AR-HUD has moved from technical verification to mass production; for the latter, smart headlights have completed the extension from simple illumination to information projection and safety interaction.
Of course, under the current industry background, both application scenarios face the same underlying challenges: integration of optical systems, miniaturization, and automotive-grade reliability. This actually means that the logic of competition in in-vehicle optics has undergone a fundamental change—from comparing parameters of single devices to the integration capability contest of system-level optical solutions.
It is at this junction of industrial logic transition that Yipu Optoelectronics' recent strategic layout has taken the lead in providing a system-level implementation plan. This company, which started with freeform optics, not only completed the relocation of its headquarters within a few short months but also successively integrated Suzhou Longma Puxin and Jiangxi De Kai into its territory, consciously building a complete value chain covering optical design, core chips, optomechanical integration, and full-vehicle light-shadow interaction. Adopting the posture of a system integrator, it positions itself for a new round of industrial cycles.
Headquarters Relocation South: Anchoring New Industrial Coordinates for In-Vehicle Photoelectric
In December 2025, Yipu Optoelectronics completed its headquarters relocation. The new headquarters was established in the Nanxi High-tech Zone, Jinjiang, Fujian. Within the following months, Yipu Optoelectronics' R&D center and core production center were put into operation successively, and on July 28, the headquarters opening ceremony was officially held.
Image Source: Yipu Optoelectronics
For a national high-tech enterprise that was founded in 2018 (core technology accumulation can be traced back to the Tianjin University Micro-Nano Manufacturing Laboratory in 2005) and has deepened in Tianjin for many years, this headquarters relocation south was defined by Guo Yewu, Chairman of Yipu Optoelectronics (Fujian) Co., Ltd., as "a new strategic upgrade".
Currently, Yipu Optoelectronics has achieved complete technical accumulation in key fields such as freeform optical system design, ultra-precision optical component manufacturing and inspection, and optical performance measurement system integration. Moving such technical foundation from Tianjin to Jinjiang, Fujian, its strategic intent far exceeds spatial displacement at the geographical level, but is a strategic choice to re-anchor twenty years of technical accumulation at the industrial highland.
Image Source: Yipu Optoelectronics
The location value of Jinjiang lies in the superposition of multiple advantages.
Jinjiang not only has a complete electronic information and optoelectronic display industry cluster, but also pragmatic and efficient government services and the entrepreneurial spirit of "daring to fight and winning". Guo Yewu stated that Nanyi Xinchuang Port, as an important carrier of regional technological innovation, provides an ideal development platform for Yipu Optoelectronics.
After the headquarters settles in Jinjiang, it will undertake core R&D and operation management functions, forming a collaborative industrial matrix with overseas and domestic production bases and R&D, R&D sales centers located in Shenzhen, Fuyang, Tianjin, Lujiang, Wuhan, Wuxi, Pingxiang, Japan, Malaysia, etc., accelerating the group process of Yipu Optoelectronics. In addition, it is worth mentioning that as a famous hometown of overseas Chinese and a front line of opening up to the outside world, Fujian has natural policy and location advantages in going global, which also forms a high degree of strategic fit with Yipu Optoelectronics' globalization strategy being promoted.
Image Source: Gasgoo
Deeper considerations lie in the convenience of market supply.
Fujian is adjacent to the southern China automotive industry cluster and is the supply chain hinterland of many top new energy vehicle companies. Relocating the headquarters and core processing capabilities here, Yipu Optoelectronics has actually completed a "closer to the market, closer to innovation" strategic upgrade.
In the industrial context where the cycle of in-vehicle optical products is constantly compressed from R&D to mass production, this geographical embedding means faster customer response speed, tighter collaborative R&D rhythm, and lower logistics and communication costs. The overall innovation rhythm of the enterprise will also resonate more in frequency with the industry's iteration cycle.
Strategic Integration: Leap in System Capability by Connecting Points into Chains
If the headquarters relocation south solves the question of "where to compete", then the recent acquisition of Longma Puxin and De Kai better answers the core proposition of "what to compete with".
In May 2026, Yipu Optoelectronics announced the official launch of a strategic acquisition of Suzhou Longma Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Longma Puxin was initiated by the Chinese Academy of Sciences and an international optics team, focusing on the R&D of MEMS display control chips, passive combiner chips, HUD optomechanics and micro-mirrors, etc. It has mature technology and product layouts in the fields of in-vehicle projection chips, optomechanical integration, and MEMS drive control.
Image Source: Yipu Optoelectronics
Longma Puxin's independently developed LBS (Laser Beam Scanning) MEMS laser scanning core technology has completed automotive-grade reliability and functional safety verification, marking that domestic MEMS optical scanning solutions have entered a new stage of in-vehicle mass production.
The strategic intent of this acquisition is very clear: control core chips upstream. LBS MEMS technology takes MEMS micro-mirrors as the core execution unit, combined with laser light sources and high-speed modulation algorithms, to achieve laser scanning imaging with small volume, low power consumption, no focusing, and high color gamut. Compared with traditional DLP and LCoS solutions, LBS MEMS has better shock resistance, temperature adaptability, and space utilization in harsh in-vehicle environments. For Yipu Optoelectronics, the MEMS chips and micro-mirror capabilities brought by Longma Puxin have enabled it to extend capabilities from optical components to core chips in the optoelectronic display field.
If acquiring Longma Puxin is "controlling upwards", then acquiring Jiangxi De Kai is "expanding downwards".
Recently, Yipu Optoelectronics officially announced the completion of the strategic acquisition of Jiangxi De Kai Auto Lighting Co., Ltd. De Kai has been deeply cultivating in automotive smart lighting for more than ten years, possessing the ability to independently develop full sets of vehicle lamp assemblies, mold development, and automated mass production delivery. Current customers cover more than ten mainstream automotive brands in China.
Yipu Optoelectronics had previously had product layouts in in-vehicle display such as HUD, in-vehicle projection, and out-vehicle projection headlights. The addition of De Kai has helped Yipu Optoelectronics achieve complete coverage in the field of full-vehicle headlights from cockpit display to external lighting, and the systematic competitiveness has undergone a qualitative improvement. As Guo Yewu stated, after this M&A, Yipu Optoelectronics became the only technology enterprise in China currently possessing full-link capabilities from display chips to display modules to display complete machines.
The synergies after the completion of the acquisition are worth deep analysis. Xu Feizhang, CEO of Yipu Optoelectronics (Fujian) Co., Ltd., introduced the actual value of this model to clients to Gasgoo: In the past, customers needed to communicate with multiple suppliers separately, and communication costs and management burdens were quite heavy. Now, Yipu Optoelectronics alone can complete the full-chain collaboration from chips to assemblies, and an internal communication meeting can coordinate the positioning and development of the entire product. This capability is not a simple capacity superposition, but directly responds to the dual demands of partners for delivery efficiency and cost control.
The rhythm of the two acquisitions was compact and the logic was clear — Longma Puxin solves the core chips and scanning technology of "seeing clearly", De Kai solves the out-vehicle light and shadow and mass production manufacturing of "lighting well". Superimposing on Yipu Optoelectronics' original freeform optical design and precision manufacturing capabilities, a full-stack in-vehicle optical capability system covering chips, optics, optomechanics, and full vehicles has already taken shape.
Lu Rui, President of Market Strategy of Yipu Optoelectronics (Fujian) Co., Ltd., further explained the unique value of this system from the perspective of competitive differentiation when interviewed by Gasgoo. After the merger and restructuring, from upstream chips to intermediate optical systems, to manufacturing and overall solutions, Yipu Optoelectronics has formed a complete differentiated layout. Many enterprises in the industry currently neither involve the chip layer nor sink to the bottom-layer optical manufacturing. In the case of missing both ends, even if single solutions can be provided, it is difficult to truly form comprehensive competitive advantages in the three dimensions of technology, processing, and cost. And the superposition of these capabilities is precisely where Yipu Optoelectronics occupies the initiative in the future industrial pattern.
In the past supply chain system, chips, optical devices, optomechanical systems, and full-vehicle applications belonged to suppliers at different levels, with gaps in technical connections and games of commercial interests between each other. When an enterprise can connect from upstream display chips to downstream full-vehicle light-shadow interaction, it gains capabilities extremely scarce in the existing supply system — defining products, optimizing costs, and accelerating iteration from a system-level perspective. This capability is becoming a key variable determining the upper limit of enterprises in the new era defined by experience vehicles.
Image Source: Yipu Optoelectronics
Redefining the Optical "Language" of Human-Vehicle Interaction
While continuously perfecting technical capabilities, Yipu Optoelectronics' understanding of in-vehicle optics is also deepening continuously. This deepening is not only reflected in the expansion of product lines but more in the systematic research and development of common industry problems and the forward-looking layout of future interaction forms.
From the perspective of industry trends, in-vehicle optics is currently at a key node where it transitions from optional configuration to core systems.
With the accelerated arrival of L3 autonomous driving, AR-HUD will provide more intelligent interaction, safety reliability and convenient entertainment scenario applications, and future market potential is expected to continue to be released. In the field of smart headlights, intelligent vehicle light technology such as million pixels has become a main product highlight on many domestic high-end new energy models. In the future, with the market penetration of this configuration, it will inevitably lead the acceleration of in-vehicle interaction and entertainment functions towards personalization and customizability. And in-vehicle projection is gradually becoming an important option for rear screens in mid-to-high-end models with advantages such as large screen format, multi-scenarios, and playability.
These trends all point to a core proposition: light is becoming the core interaction medium between cars and humans. In-vehicle light is expected to become a potential new growth curve for the automotive industry.
But the clarity of trends does not mean the path is smooth. Common problems facing the industry are still prominent: compatibility of safety and regulations, breakthroughs in technical barriers, balance of cost and performance, etc., are all realistic obstacles restricting the large-scale popularization of in-vehicle optics. Taking AR-HUD as an example, larger screen format, smaller volume, higher image quality are future development directions, but how to achieve these goals in limited in-vehicle space while meeting automotive-grade reliability requirements tests the system capabilities of every participant.
Of course, it is precisely in the face of these industry problems that Yipu Optoelectronics' full-stack capabilities highlight the value even more. Guo Yewu clearly pointed out that for people doing precision optics, there is no shortcut, only continuous innovation. "Cars are turning from original driving tools into a mobile home", Guo Yewu stated that after becoming a mobile home, vehicles need to provide more emotional value to guests. As a photoelectric display supplier, we need to continuously provide innovative products from display, sound, haptics and other aspects.
Yipu Optoelectronics is promoting a series of innovation directions. For example, on the car, Yipu Optoelectronics innovatively proposed ultra-short throw partition projection. While meeting user experience, it can also reduce volume and facilitate installation. Xu Feizhang demonstrated the underlying logic of this technology in the product exhibition hall — introducing the ultra-short throw display technology of laser TV into the car, not only achieving higher color gamut, brightness and resolution, but more importantly, the all-in-one design thoroughly solves the pain point of personnel walking and blocking the optical path in traditional projection solutions. Yipu Optoelectronics is also exploring another forward-looking application innovation — integrating LiDAR with digital smart headlights. Traditional LiDAR is installed on the car roof, not only is the shape abrupt, but it also faces safety hazards of inability to self-clean. Since headlights themselves possess mature self-cleaning functions, after embedding LiDAR into the headlight assembly, it can not only guarantee the all-weather reliability of the sensor but also significantly optimize the smoothness of the overall vehicle appearance.
Image Source: Yipu Optoelectronics
Using the latest technology and highest performance to meet the superior experience of terminal users on in-vehicle and out-vehicle display, as Guo Yewu said: "Only continuous innovation can move consumers and inject new vitality into this highly competitive industry."
Lu Rui supplemented Yipu Optoelectronics' differentiated thinking from the perspective of technical routes. In the past, Yipu Optoelectronics focused on optical component manufacturing, lens solutions and optomechanical system delivery, etc., more playing the role of a processing solution provider. With the completion of capabilities such as LBS MEMS chips, Yipu Optoelectronics has also become capable of outputting complete solutions such as micro-projection, ultra-short throw, and high-brightness direct projection in the consumer field, completing the positioning leap from a processing solution provider to a complete solution provider.
Behind this transformation is the re-upgrading of corporate value positioning, entering the higher-value system integration link, and possessing the ability to define product forms and interaction experiences.
Image Source: Yipu Optoelectronics
Summary:
Starting from freeform optics technology, to possessing full-link capabilities covering HUD, optical chips, headlights, etc., Yipu Optoelectronics has taken an evolutionary path from single-point technical breakthroughs to system capability construction. Behind it reflects not only the enterprise's keen grasp of optical technology generational substitution, but also a deep understanding of the underlying trend of the intelligent automotive industry moving towards experience definition.
The headquarters relocation south does not solve simple spatial displacement, but embeds R&D decisions, customer response, and supply chain collaboration into the industrial hinterland, making the enterprise's innovation rhythm and the industry's iteration cycle resonate more in frequency. The strategic integration of Longma Puxin and De Kai completes a complete optical ecology "puzzle", obtaining a capability combination extremely scarce in the existing in-vehicle optical supply system: from optical chips to optical components, from optomechanical systems to full-vehicle light-shadow interaction, all integrated into one, realizing independent and controllable core technologies, and building a unique industrial ecology advantage.
The current automotive industry has a consensus that the first half of intelligent vehicle competition revolves around "three-electric systems", competing in range and acceleration; the contest in the second half anchors on experience and interaction, and all experiences — whether navigation guidance projected by HUD, safety light carpets spread by headlights, or flowing ambient light shadows inside the cockpit — must ultimately be conveyed through light.
Whoever can achieve full-stack control from source to terminal in the light chain will possess the capability foundation to define the next generation of human-vehicle interaction. The "Chip-Optics-Optomechanics-Headlights" full-chain system constructed by Yipu Optoelectronics is precisely building the underlying base for this new era of photoelectric-defined experience that is arriving.
When the light chain extends from components to scenarios, and connects from inside the cabin to outside the cabin, what an enterprise can define is not only product parameters but also a completely new industry trend.
© 2024 Bitauto.com. All Rights Reserved.
Bitauto (www.yiche.com and www.bitauto.com) is one of the most visited automotive websites in China. We provide detailed info on Chinese car brands available in your area. Please note that the information provided on this website is based on publicly available data and is for reference only. It may not be fully updated or accurate at all times.
Help us improve our website
