HomeSoutheast
Search History
Popular Searches
Dealer Login / Sign Up
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Honda CR-V 同 GWM Haval H6 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就由多個方面嚟做詳細比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Honda CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 178,200 - 195,900，總共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS（RM 195,900）、2026 1.5T 4WD V（RM 181,900）、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E（RM 178,200） 等。
GWM Haval H6 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 139,750 - 139,750，總共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Turbo Standard（RM 140,000）、1.5L Turbo Premium（RM 155,000） 等。
從價錢睇，GWM Haval H6 嘅起步價比 Honda CR-V 平咗 RM 38,450。坦白講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵都係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Honda CR-V 配備 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
GWM Haval H6 配備 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
動力方面，GWM Haval H6 嘅 Hybrid 比 Honda CR-V 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 多咗 0 匹馬力。不過平日喺市區行，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Honda CR-V 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。
GWM Haval H6 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到咗唔錯嘅評級。不過 Honda CR-V 嘅 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM) 同 GWM Haval H6 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有少少分別，如果你好睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細睇下兩者嘅功能列表。
Honda CR-V 車身長 4500 mm，車尾箱 450 L。
GWM Haval H6 車身長 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。
空間方面，Honda CR-V 嘅車身比 GWM Haval H6 長咗 100 mm，車內乘坐空間會稍為寬裕少少，尤其係後座腿部空間。如果你經常載家人或者需要放嬰兒車，車身大少少確實更實用。
Honda CR-V 採 FWD 驅動方式。
GWM Haval H6 採 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
總體嚟講，Honda CR-V 同 GWM Haval H6 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試車做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
Di pasaran SUV Malaysia, ramai pembeli semasa memilih kereta akan membandingkan Honda CR-V dan Chery Tiggo 9. Kedua-dua kereta ini dari segi harga dan kedudukan pasaran agak hampir, hari ini kita buat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek, membantu anda menjimatkan masa mencari maklumat.
Honda CR-V di Malaysia harga OTR ialah RM 178,200 - 195,900, terdapat 4 varian, termasuk 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200) dan sebagainya.
Chery Tiggo 9 di Malaysia harga OTR ialah RM 166,800 - 179,800, terdapat 1 varian, termasuk 2026 2.0T Standard (RM 179,750) dan sebagainya.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Chery Tiggo 9 lebih murah RM 11,400 berbanding Honda CR-V. Jujur katakan, dalam julat harga ini, beza ribuan ringgit sebenarnya tidak begitu besar, yang penting adalah nilai keseluruhan dan kos penggunaan jangka panjang.
Honda CR-V diperlengkapi enjin 2.0L 4-silinder, kuasa 170 hp. Penggunaan bahan api rasmi 8.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 9 diperlengkapi enjin 2.0L 4-silinder, kuasa 170 hp. Penggunaan bahan api rasmi 8.0 L/100km.
Kedua-dua kereta menggunakan sistem kuasa yang sama, pengalaman memandu harian pada dasarnya tiada perbezaan. Dari segi penggunaan bahan api juga hampir sama, tidak perlu terlalu bimbang tentang hal ini.
Honda CR-V panjang kenderaan 4500 mm, kotak bagasi 450 L.
Chery Tiggo 9 panjang kenderaan 4400 mm, kotak bagasi 400 L.
Dari segi ruang, panjang kenderaan Honda CR-V adalah 100 mm lebih panjang daripada Chery Tiggo 9, ruang duduk dalam kereta akan sedikit lebih lapang, terutamanya ruang kaki di kerusi belakang. Jika anda kerap membawa keluarga atau perlu menaruh basikal bayi, badan kenderaan yang sedikit lebih besar memang lebih praktikal.
Honda CR-V menggunakan sistem penggerak FWD.
Chery Tiggo 9 menggunakan sistem penggerak FWD.
Sistem penggerak kedua-dua kereta sama, semuanya FWD, pengalaman memandu harian tidak akan ada perbezaan yang besar.
Honda CR-V dan Chery Tiggo 9 kedua-duanya adalah pilihan utama pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga dan perjalanan harian. Jika anda lebih mengutamakan reputasi jenama dan harga terpakai, boleh utamakan jenama yang mempunyai reputasi lebih baik; jika anda lebih mengutamakan nilai perbelanjaan dan kelengkapan, maka pilih yang mempunyai kelengkapan lebih banyak. Akhir sekali adalah cadangkan kedua-duanya untuk dicuba memandu, mengalami sendiri adalah yang paling penting.
Secara keseluruhan, Honda CR-V dan Chery Tiggo 9 adalah model yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana, penting sekali lihat keperluan peribadi dan belanjawan anda. Cadangan kepada anda lakukan maklumat terlebih dahulu, bandingkan harga beberapa pejabat jualan kereta, kemudian buat uji pemanduan untuk buat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa mencari maklumat pasti tidak akan salah.
Dalam pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli ketika memilih kereta akan membandingkan Honda CR-V dan Chery Tiggo 9. Kedua-dua model kereta ini mempunyai julat harga dan kedudukannya yang sangat hampir, hari ini kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Honda CR-V mempunyai harga OTR di Malaysia sebanyak RM 178,200 - 195,900, terdapat 4 versi, termasuk 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200) dan lain-lain.
Chery Tiggo 9 mempunyai harga OTR di Malaysia sebanyak RM 166,800 - 179,800, terdapat 1 versi, termasuk 2026 2.0T Standard (RM 179,750) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Chery Tiggo 9 adalah RM 11,400 lebih murah daripada Honda CR-V. Jujurnya, dalam julat harga ini, perbezaan beberapa ribu sebenarnya tidak besar, perkara utama adalah melihat nisbah nilai keseluruhan dan kos penggunaan jangka panjang.
Honda CR-V dilengkapi enjin 2.0L 4-silinder, 170 hp. Penggunaan bahan api rasmi 8.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 9 dilengkapi enjin 2.0L 4-silinder, 170 hp. Penggunaan bahan api rasmi 8.0 L/100km.
Kedua-dua kereta menggunakan sistem kuasa yang sama, perbezaan semasa memandu harian hampir tiada. Penggunaan bahan api juga sama, jangan terlalu bimbang dengan hal ini.
Penilaian keselamatan Honda CR-V ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Penilaian keselamatan Chery Tiggo 9 ialah TBD, sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk Basic.
Dari segi peralatan keselamatan, kedua-dua kereta mendapat penilaian yang baik. Namun, Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM) pada Honda CR-V dan Basic pada Chery Tiggo 9 mempunyai beberapa perbezaan dari segi fungsi. Jika anda lebih memprioritaskan keselamatan aktif, anda boleh membandingkan senarai fungsi kedua-duanya dengan teliti.
Panjang badan Honda CR-V 4500 mm, ruang bagasi 450 L.
Panjang badan Chery Tiggo 9 4400 mm, ruang bagasi 400 L.
Dari segi ruang, badan Honda CR-V adalah 100 mm lebih panjang daripada Chery Tiggo 9, ruang duduk di dalam kenderaan akan sedikit lebih lapang, terutamanya ruang kaki baris belakang. Jika anda kerap membawa keluarga atau perlu letak kereta bayi, badan yang lebih besar memang lebih praktikal.
Honda CR-V waranti 5 tahun/jarak tanpa had, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Chery Tiggo 9 waranti 3 tahun/100,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Secara keseluruhan, Honda CR-V dan Chery Tiggo 9 adalah model kereta yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana, terutamanya melihat keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Kami sarankan anda membuat kajian dengan baik, membandingkan beberapa tawaran dari dealer kereta, kemudian uji jalan untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, menghabiskan masa membuat kajian tidak akan salah.
「救哪吒仲要靠太乙真人。」當浙江太乙聖蓮企業管理合夥企業擬出資 30 億元入主哪吒汽車母公司合眾新能源嘅消息傳出後，呢句調侃迅速喺車圈傳開。名字確實好似劇本寫好咗一樣——太乙真人救哪吒，神話照進現實。
但神話歸神話，商業歸商業。30 億呢個數字喺哪吒嘅債務面前，實在算唔到咩大數目。合眾新能源債權人申報債權總額超過 260 億元，30 億投資中只有 11.67 億用於清償債權同破產費用，剩下嘅 18.33 億拿去補充流動資金。呢個就好似一個申報欠款 260 萬嘅債務人，有人拿出 30 萬資金參與重整，剩餘大部分債務仲要自己處理。
所以問題嚟啦：一間停產接近兩年、三年累計虧損 183 億、連薪金都發唔出嘅車廠，點解仲可以令資本掏出 30 億？
30 億買嘅究竟係咩？
睇吓呢場交易嘅營運主體，浙江太乙聖蓮成立於 2026 年 4 月，專門為呢次重整而設立，背後實際控制人是山子高科董事長葉驥。根據最新嘅澄清公告，山子高科同太乙聖蓮唔存在股權控制關係，上市公司並冇直接或者間接參與今次哪吒汽車重整投資，唔併表，重整嘅盈虧同風險全部唔會納入上市公司報表；呢項投資目前仍處於意向階段，最終能否落實仲要睇債權人表決同法院裁定。換句話講，今次入局係葉驥依托體外平台獨立運作，由一開始已經做好風險隔離。
實際上，葉驥喺造車呢件事上佈局已久。2023 年，山子高科收購咗邢台龍崗，成功拿到河北紅星汽車嘅整車生產資質，並喺 2024 年 7 月推出量產車型。但呢條造車路線嘅產品集中喺物流車同出口市場，並冇涉足主流乘用車市場。對於想規模化造車嘅葉驥嚟講，手頭始終缺一張完整嘅乘用車「門票」。
市場之內，能夠填補呢一短板嘅標的極為稀缺，而哪吒汽車剛好持有呢張「券」。合眾新能源喺 2017 年、2018 年先後拿到發改委、工信部雙重造車准入資質，即係行業稀缺嘅新能源造車「雙資質」。2023 年工信部收緊代工規則，要求代工合作雙方均需具備生產資質，徹底抬高咗行業入局門檻。到而家，全新申請造車資質幾乎無落地可能，想要入局，只能透過收購存量資質主體嚟彎道入場。
太乙聖蓮喺重整草案裡面寫得幾直白：管理團隊「有豐富嘅汽車產業營運經驗同破產重整經驗」，今次投資嘅核心目標就係「維持「造車雙資質」」。合眾新能源嘅管理人喺招募託管方時特別強調過呢點，如果保唔住雙資質，哪吒就會失去吸引投資嘅關鍵籌碼。
除咗資質，哪吒仲留下一間廠同埋一套品牌認知。浙江桐鄉 350 畝嘅工廠、江西宜春同廣西南寧嘅生產基地，總年產能設計達 30 萬輛。品牌層面，哪吒喺 2022 年曾經以 15.2 萬輛嘅交車量登上新勢力銷冠，累計累積咗超過 44 萬全球車主。呢啲資產單獨拎出嚟價值有限，但打包喺一齊，對於想快速切入新能源賽道嘅企業嚟講，確係一條慳時間嘅捷徑。
當然，資本睇到入局機會，債權人嘅處境就冇咁光鮮。合眾新能源普通債權約 117 億元，涉及 1600 多戶，80 萬元以下部分清償率約為 12%，超過 80 萬元嘅部分直接實施債轉股。優先債權約 22 億元，頭三年只付利息，第四年先至開始還本。地方國資嘅損失更加沉重，宜春國資平台近 20 億元股權投資、當地國企 3 億元基建配套投入，喺本次重整方案入面基本好難收回。
亦正因為呢場交易入面冷熱懸殊嘅利益格局，市場對哪吒嘅重生保持緊理性態度。有債權人判斷：今次重整計劃通過嘅可能性好大，但哪吒汽車能否真正重啟量產，仲要觀察。
「復活者聯盟」嘅真相
哪吒唔係第一個靠資本嘗試「復活」嘅新勢力。過去兩年，威馬同高合相繼走入破產重整，三條路線各有差異，但底層邏輯就有相似嘅地方。
威馬行嘅係地方政府參與、搭配產業資本嘅模式。2025 年 4 月，法院批准威馬重整計劃，深圳翔飛汽車成為新股東，承諾投入超過 100 億元，計劃喺溫州基地重啟 EX5 同 E5 嘅量產。翔飛當時拿出的發展規劃好宏大，目標喺 2030 年挑戰年產 100 萬輛、營收 1200 億元。但直到 2025 年底，威馬都冇迎來規模化復產。
高合就選擇引入海外資本，綁定地方現有產能。2025 年 5 月，黎巴嫩電動車公司 EV Electra 設立註冊資本 1.43 億美圓嘅新公司，持股 69.8%。資本方睇中嘅係鹽城工廠嘅現成產能、造車資質，同埋高合品牌喺中東、歐洲市場具備嘅出海溢價潛力。然而到 2026 年初，EV Electra 承諾嘅後續資金並冇如期到賬，鹽城基地都冇開始大規模復工。
梳理呢三宗案例，能夠見到一條共同嘅走向：重整方案規劃方面，企業都唔再優先參與國內市場嘅正面競爭，而係將目光投向外海或者區域市場。哪吒今次重整嘅第一階段規劃，正係復產哪吒 X 面向海外，目標年銷 1 萬台。
但這恰恰係另一個難題。泰國曾經係哪吒出海最有成效嘅市場，2024 年喺當地全年銷量 7969 輛，位列泰國新能源市場全球品牌第三名。然而隨著國內母公司陷入債務危機，喺泰國嘅經銷商從 60 幾間減少到約 20 間，售後能力大幅下滑，泰國財政部甚至擬透過法律途徑起訴哪吒泰國子公司，追討由 2022 年以來發出嘅超過 20 億泰銖補貼。
然而，喺哪吒嘅「復活」故事入面，最微妙嘅角色其實係地方國資。佢哋曾經係哪吒擴張階段主要嘅資金來源，而喺而家重整方案之下，大部分前期投入好難收回。太乙聖蓮投入 30 億元，換走約 70.62% 嘅股權，原有股東權益被大幅稀釋，價值基本清零。新資本以較低嘅成本，承接咗一個完整嘅造車資質與產能資產，而過去多年累積嘅虧損同埋沉沒成本，基本由原有投資方同債權人承擔。
一個值得注意嘅細節係，葉驥並非第一次嘗試入主哪吒。2025 年 6 月，山子高科方面確認為意向戰略投資人，同年 9 月成為唯一合格重整意向方，當時拋出嘅係 45 億元嘅重整方案。但因為原重整計劃草案未能按時提交，桐鄉法院裁定終止原有重整程序，合眾新能源一度轉入破產清算，呢份 45 億方案就此作廢。而家呢份 30 億方案，相比當初縮水咗三分之一，已經有債權人公開表達咗唔滿，認為方案嘅債權清償率過低。
從最初計劃由山子高科相關主體報名，到報價由 45 億壓縮至 30 億，再切換為董事長葉驥嘅體外 SPV 操盤，葉驥嘅策略喺調整，但想要拿到整車乘用車資質同產能嘅目標冇變。當造車資質成為可以單獨評估、打包交易嘅資產，當地方產業基金多年投入，最終只能夠拿到 12% 嘅債權清償率。呢場所謂嘅「復活」，究竟復活係品牌，定係一張被重新貼咗標籤嘅許可證，可能唔同嘅當事方心裡會有唔同嘅答案。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會揀 Honda CR-V 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺售價同定位上都幾接近，而家我哋就從多個方面做個詳細比較，幫你省卻做功課嘅時間。
Honda CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 178,200 - 195,900，一共 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS（RM 195,900）、2026 1.5T 4WD V（RM 181,900）、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E（RM 178,200） 等。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,750 - 129,750，一共 2 個版本，包括 2025 1.5T 90km CSH（RM 129,750）、Tiggo 7 PHEV 支援邊種充電方式？可以喺家用插座充電嗎？（RM 117,478） 等。
從價格嚟睇，Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅入門價比 Honda CR-V 平咗 RM 48,450。老實講，喺呢個價碼範圍，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵都係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Honda CR-V 裝 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 裝 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
動力方面，Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅 Hybrid 比 Honda CR-V 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 多咗 0 匹馬力。唔過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Honda CR-V 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括基本。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。唔過 Honda CR-V 嘅 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM) 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅基本喺功能上有些少分別，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較一下兩邊嘅功能列表。
Honda CR-V 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
總括嚟講，Honda CR-V 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場好好嘅車型。揀邊架，關鍵依然睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最後決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
Neta Auto might really be "resurrected".
The funniest part is, the company coming to save it is named Taiyi Shenglian.
Seeing this, I guess many people's first reaction is similar to mine: Did they come up with this name on the spot?
Turns out, it really is the case.
Taiyi Shenglian was established in April this year, specifically as the entity for this restructuring. Now it is prepared to pay 3 billion yuan to acquire approximately 70.62% of the equity of Neta Auto's parent company, Hozon New Energy. In mythology, Taiyi Zhenren used a lotus to reshape Nezha's body, and by 2026, the capital market actually reenacted this story.
I can only say, after so many years of marketing in the auto industry, the most effective wave of communication this time was completed by the Industry and Commerce Bureau.
But after playing this gimmick, I am still quite curious, why is there still someone willing to spend 3 billion to save Nezha at this time?
A few years ago, if someone invested 3 billion into a new energy vehicle company, it seemed nothing strange. But by today, the market is completely different.
Is China still lacking in automobile brands?
Everyone just open the sales list and scroll down; BYD, Geely Galaxy, Leapmotor, Changan Qiyuan, Chery, Aion, plus a bunch of brands still struggling to squeeze onto the table. 100,000, 150,000, 200,000, every price bracket is almost full.
And at this time, someone returns holding 3 billion yuan to pull a Neta that has been halted for a long time back up.
I can only say, friend, your head is really stubborn.
After all, one of the topics discussed most in the industry has long changed from "Who can still enter" to "How many more need to be eliminated".
So let's first see how this 3 billion yuan plans to be spent.
According to the currently disclosed restructuring draft, Taiyi Shenglian will contribute 3 billion yuan. Approximately 1.167 billion yuan will be used to clear related creditors and pay bankruptcy expenses. The amount that can truly be injected into the company to support production resumption and operations is about 1.833 billion yuan. Taiyi Shenglian will eventually acquire approximately 70.62% of Hozon New Energy's equity.
So everyone, don't be stunned by the number "3 billion to resurrect Nezha". The money truly available to start working again is just over 1.8 billion.
Is 1.8 billion a lot? If I put it in my bank card, it's enough for me to research how to spend it for a lifetime. But in an auto company, you have to restrain yourself a bit.
It is precisely because of this, when I saw the first phase of this restructuring plan, I actually felt they were still taking it easy this time.
First, resume production of Nezha X, mainly for overseas markets, with an annual sales target of 10,000 units, and simultaneously restore official spare parts, maintenance, repair, and existing service networks.
Especially when seeing "10,000 units", I even felt a bit relieved, finally no one is shouting for tens or hundreds of thousands of sales at the very start.
The thing Neta is currently most anxious about might not even be reaching "returning to mainstream new energy brands" on such a grand scale. First, get the factory turning again, call back suppliers, and ensure owners of old cars with broken cars have someone to repair them. If these few things can be done smoothly, that counts as taking a big step forward.
Actually, the old owner part is also easily overlooked by everyone.
After a car brand collapses, the awkward ones are never the onlookers. Onlookers at most contribute one sentence: "I told you so."
The ones with real headaches are those who have already handed over over 100,000 yuan. Who will repair my car? Are there still spare parts? If problems arise, can I still find the manufacturer?
So this time, the restructuring plan puts resuming after-sales service and official spare parts supply in the first phase. I think this order is at least correct.
After all, if you want to sell cars again, you first have to ensure those who have already bought your car aren't that panicked.
But speaking of this, problems arise. What does Neta have left that is worth someone spending 3 billion to take over?
If we talk only about the four words "Neta Auto", I think everyone should not think it is too valuable first.
Neta has indeed been spectacular before. In 2022, sales exceeded 150,000 units and it took the number one annual sales spot among new forces. But automobiles are quite cruel; after brand voice drops, consumer memory refreshes particularly fast.
If you were sales champion two or three years ago, today if a Neta X is set up again in a shopping mall, consumers might still first ask a question: "Has their business returned to normal?"
This sentence hurts quite a bit. Because many auto companies can recover production capacity with money. But brand credibility drops, and picking it back up is not that simple, especially for big-ticket items like cars that people prepare to use for many years.
So the valuable things Neta still has, I think, need to be looked at behind the brand. Including factory, production lines, molds, R&D systems, supply chain relationships, complete vehicle manufacturing capabilities, and overseas systems built up in the past. These things might be more interesting to investors than the name "Neta" itself.
Especially do not forget who is behind Taiyi Shenglian.
Although Taiyi Shenglian is the investment entity established specifically this time, several layers of equity and personnel relationships point to the Shanzi High-Tech system. Shanzi High-Tech's current main business already includes automotive parts and complete vehicles two major sectors. Under it there is also the Belgian Punch (making powertrains), and the American ARC (making airbag gas generators).
Moreover, in these years, Shanzi High-Tech has never given up on moving towards complete vehicles.
It previously acquired Red Star Auto, did complete vehicle factory revitalization, and now there is also the Shanzi Youqian complete vehicle business under it. Zhu Renjie, who is in charge of Shanzi Youqian, previously worked at Tesla as Director of Manufacturing Engineering and participated in the formation of the Shanghai Gigafactory body manufacturing team.
Putting this string of things together, the matter roughly makes sense.
Neta lacks money, Shanzi High-Tech lacks a "ready-made complete vehicle company".
Shanzi High-Tech has parts, manufacturing experience, and some overseas resources, but from "I can make things for others" to "I can make a complete vehicle and sell it", there is still a fairly wide gap in between.
R&D systems need to be built, supply chains need to be built, production, certification, sales, after-sales all need to be built. If truly starting from zero, money aside, time alone would be enough to drink a pot of tea (quite a long time).
Neta just happens to have basically walked through these things already. Even if now many links are already broken, it at least once reached annual sales of 150,000, has products truly mass-produced, has a supply chain, has a factory, and has sold cars overseas.
So standing from Shanzi High-Tech's angle, spending 3 billion to save a laggard new force sounds quite adventurous.
But if it is spending 3 billion to acquire an automobile company that already possesses complete vehicle R&D, production, supply chain, overseas business, and "dual qualification" foundation, then stuffing their parts, manufacturing, and overseas resources into it, suddenly does it not seem so ridiculous?
Especially previously, when Hozon New Energy was seeking a management trustee, they specifically mentioned maintaining "automotive manufacturing dual qualifications", and later the Shanzi system also established a complete vehicle sales related company in Tongxiang.
This basically already has their thoughts written on their face. What they truly value is never just the Neta brand, more still the complete vehicle manufacturing, sales, and overseas business foundation that Neta has already set up.
One lacks money, one lacks a complete vehicle platform. Looking at it this way, Taiyi Shenglian "saving Nezha" slowly returns from mythological stories back to business.
And I think, this matter is quite representative of a certain way of playing in the automobile industry in the future.
In the past when capital had money, everyone was from zero starting to build a new brand with dozens or hundreds of billions.
Now the first elimination round has come to this, many brands might not be able to survive, but factories remain, equipment remains, supply chains remain, R&D systems have a little left.
So a failed automobile brand, at its cheapest time, might actually be when the set of vehicle manufacturing capabilities it left behind is most attractive.
Neta this time is roughly in this situation.
This also explains why the first step of the restructuring plan did not urgently focus on redriving the domestic market, but placed hope overseas.
Neta has already fallen behind domestically, but overseas has left a little foundation. In the first half of 2024, overseas deliveries exceeded 17,000 units. Thailand, Indonesia also had plans for local production, and Nezha X itself already has an overseas sales foundation.
Now taking over 1.8 billion plus to return and charge into this fiercely competitive domestic market, I am nervous for this money.
First, pick up the overseas business that has run through once, let factories, supply chains, and cash flow turn again. At least it is much more reliable than coming back to hard fight domestically.
So, back to the very beginning question. There are already so many Chinese automobile brands, is it necessary to spend money to resurrect Neta?
If it is just pulling Neta back to the domestic market, continuing to compete with Leapmotor, BYD, Changan, Geely in the 100,000 to several hundred thousand yuan new energy vehicle market, I think the meaning is indeed not great.
But first, restart Neta's overseas product lines as a敲门砖 (敲门砖 translates to "door-knob" i.e., entry tool) to open the overseas market, this business still has some chew.
As for whether this brand will have a chance in the future to ride the wind and fire wheels and kill back to the domestic market...
First see if Taiyi Shenglian can revitalize itself first.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Honda CR-V 同 Mazda CX-80 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，而家我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Honda CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 178,200 - 195,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS（RM 195,900）、2026 1.5T 4WD V（RM 181,900）、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E（RM 178,200）等等。
Mazda CX-80 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 296,610 - 296,610，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2025 2.5L 65km High Plus（RM 296,610）等等。
由價錢睇，Honda CR-V 嘅起步價確實比 Mazda CX-80 平咗 RM 118,410。如果你預算有限，Honda 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都係要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，喺配備上可能會有取舍，具體就要睇你嘅需要。
Honda CR-V 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。
Mazda CX-80 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Brand ADAS。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Honda CR-V 保養 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-80 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Honda CR-V 同 Mazda CX-80 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更加重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑好嗰一款；如果你更加在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身感受先至最重要。
總體嚟講，Honda CR-V 同 Mazda CX-80 都係馬來西亞市場幾好嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵始終都係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 本田 CR-V 同 馬自達 CX-9 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省做功課嘅時間。
本田 CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 178,200 - 195,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS（RM 195,900）、2026 1.5T 4WD V（RM 181,900）、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E（RM 178,200） 等。
馬自達 CX-9 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 328,810 - 345,810，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2023 2.5T 4WD（RM 345,810）、2023 2.5T 2WD（RM 328,810） 等。
從價錢睇，本田 CR-V 嘅起步價確實比 馬自達 CX-9 平咗 RM 150,610。如果你預算有限，本田嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嘅嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
本田 CR-V 車身長 4500 mm，尾箱 450 L。
馬自達 CX-9 車身長 4500 mm，尾箱 450 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差唔多。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
本田 CR-V 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
馬自達 CX-9 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會太大分別。
本田 CR-V 同 馬自達 CX-9 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先最重要。
總之嚟講，本田 CR-V 同 馬自達 CX-9 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
[September 11, 2026] Recently, "All-round Comfortable Large 7-Seater" Starlight 730 reports good news again: It has held the domestic MPV sales champion title within 150,000 for 10 consecutive months, topped the sales list of all MPV categories in the Thai market in August, and won the honor of "Chinese and Foreign Double Crown King". As of now, Starlight 730 domestic cumulative sales have exceeded 65,000 units, continuously refreshing the record of the national home MPV market.
On one side is the white-hot competitive Chinese market, on the other side is the Thai market where foreign brands have cultivated for years. Starlight 730 has topped the list successively, reflecting the common needs of global families for home MPVs "large space, high configuration, low energy consumption". With the double crown, it is a powerful testimony to the three core product forces of Starlight 730.
Large space, comfortable for the whole family. Whether it is a multi-child family in China or a multi-generational family in Thailand, the demand for everyone to sit comfortably is highly consistent. Starlight 730 precisely meets the real travel needs of global families with a 2+2+3 true 7-seat layout, 230mm spacious aisle in the second row, 88% space utilization rate in the third row, and over 1.2m ceiling height — elderly enter and exit easily, children move freely, full occupancy travel calmly without settling.
High configuration, making it accessible to all. Starlight 730 brings electric side-sliding doors to global driving scenarios, providing users in China and Thailand with a more calm and dignified boarding and alighting experience; its Lingmu Smart Assistive Driving, with smarter configuration and easier driving, has won widespread user favor. In the Chinese market, the vehicle is also equipped with Lingyu AI Hub Intelligent Agent, making interaction more convenient and bringing a class-leaping travel experience to families.
Low energy consumption, tailored to local conditions. In response to energy environments and driving habits of different markets, Starlight 730 provides differentiated powertrain solutions. In China, pure electric, plug-in hybrid, and fuel have one car three powertrains, covering all-scenario travel needs — daily commuting is economical and worry-free, long-distance travel is durable and reassuring; in Thailand, Starlight 730 (Darion EV) focuses on pure electric lines, relying on ultra-long range and ultra-low electricity consumption to calmly handle daily commuting and long-distance reception, better fitting the trend of green travel.
The two countries' sales championships and numerous user choices prove that "good products never know borders". Starlight 730's Chinese users are mostly multi-person families focusing on value for money and looking at whole family travel; in Thailand, its users include high-net-worth groups such as businessmen and doctors, as well as government-enterprise and high-end hotel customers. Although the crowds are different, the choices are consistent — Starlight 730's three core product forces have undergone real tests in different markets and different crowds, truly worthy of the title "Global Car".
Establishing a foothold in the Chinese market, topping the Thai market, and winning a place in the increasingly intense global competition, Starlight 730, with excellent domestic and international performance, verified SAIC-GM-Wuling's determination and strength to go global. As of now, Starlight 730 has landed in 25 overseas markets including Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Thailand, etc. In the future, SAIC-GM-Wuling will continue to cultivate domestic and overseas markets, relying on the leading advantages of Chinese smart manufacturing and technological innovation iteration to provide more universal value travel solutions for global family users.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Honda CR-V and Toyota Fortuner when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in terms of price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Honda CR-V in Malaysia is RM 178,200 - 195,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200) etc.
The OTR price of Toyota Fortuner in Malaysia is RM 195,880 - 241,880, with a total of 3 versions, including 2024 2.8T VRZ Diesel (RM 241,880), 2024 2.7L SRZ Petrol (RM 202,880), 2024 2.4L Standard Diesel (RM 195,880) etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Honda CR-V is indeed RM 17,680 cheaper than Toyota Fortuner. If your budget is limited, Honda's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, keep in mind that the few thousand ringgit saved might mean trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Honda CR-V safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Toyota Fortuner safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include .
The safety ratings of both cars are the same, safety features in this level are considered quite complete. New cars nowadays are not lacking in safety, no need to worry too much about this.
Honda CR-V uses FWD drive method.
Toyota Fortuner uses FWD drive method.
The drive methods of both cars are the same, both are FWD, so there won't be much difference in daily driving experience.
Honda CR-V and Toyota Fortuner are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use, daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and equipment, choose the one with richer configuration. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Honda CR-V and Toyota Fortuner are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will definitely not be wrong.
Di pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli semasa memilih kereta akan membandingkan Honda CR-V dan Toyota Harrier. Kedua-dua kereta ini berada dalam julat harga dan kedudukan yang agak hampir, hari ini kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek, membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Harga OTR Honda CR-V di Malaysia ialah RM 178,200 - 195,900, ada 4 varian secara keseluruhan, termasuk 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Toyota Harrier di Malaysia ialah RM 289,000 - 289,000, ada 1 varian secara keseluruhan, termasuk 2026 HEV 2.5L Standard (RM 289,000) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Honda CR-V memang RM 110,800 lebih murah daripada Toyota Harrier. Jika bajet anda terhad, versi permulaan Honda sudah cukup memenuhi keperluan harian. Namun, perlu diingat bahawa penjimatan beberapa ribu ringgit itu mungkin melibatkan kompromi dalam kelengkapan, bergantung sepenuhnya pada keperluan anda.
Honda CR-V dilengkapi enjin 2.0L 4-cyl, kuasa 170 hp. Penggunaan minyak rasmi 8.0 L/100km.
Toyota Harrier dilengkapi enjin 2.0L Turbo, kuasa 220 hp. Penggunaan minyak rasmi 9.5 L/100km.
Dari segi kuasa, 2.0L Turbo Toyota Harrier memiliki 50 hp lebih daripada 2.0L 4-cyl Honda CR-V. Namun untuk memandu harian di bandar, kuasa kedua-dua kereta sudah mencukupi, tidak akan terasa kurang tenaga.
Honda CR-V jaminan 5 Tahun/Tanpa Had Kilometer, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 Bulan.
Toyota Harrier jaminan 5 Tahun/Tanpa Had Kilometer, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 Bulan.
Kedua-dua kereta mempunyai syarat jaminan yang sama, tidak perlu bimbang tentang perkara ini. Kos penyelenggaraan sebenar bergantung pada rangkaian perkhidmatan jenama dan harga komponen, disyorkan bertanya dalam kumpulan pengguna kereta untuk pengalaman pemilik sebenar.
Honda CR-V dan Toyota Harrier kedua-duanya pilihan utama di pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga, perjalanan harian. Jika anda lebih mengutamakan reputasi jenama dan harga jualan semula, pertimbangkan dahulu yang mempunyai reputasi lebih baik; jika anda lebih mengambil berat tentang nilai wang dan kelengkapan, pilih yang mempunyai konfigurasi lebih lengkap. Pada akhirnya disyorkan untuk menguji memandu kedua-duanya, pengalaman sendiri yang paling penting.
Secara keseluruhannya, Honda CR-V dan Toyota Harrier kedua-duanya adalah model kereta yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih mana satu, yang penting lihat keperluan peribadi dan bajet anda. Disyorkan kepada semua pihak membuat kajian mendalam, membandingkan beberapa tawaran dari dealer kereta, kemudian menguji memandu untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa membuat kajian pasti tidak salah.
Titik Utama: Sekiranya anda membuat keputusan pemilihan SUV Elektrik Murni yang memberi tumpuan kepada nisbah harga-kegunaan yang tinggi dan mengutamakan latar belakang pengesahan luar negara, Changan Qiyuan Q05 baharu biasanya merupakan pilihan yang lebih boleh dipertimbangkan. Hal ini kerana ia telah dieksport dan dilancarkan di pasaran seperti Thailand, Uzbekistan, dan lain-lain, sementara di dalam negara pernah menjadi juara jualan SUV kelas kompak selama 3 bulan berturut-turut. Ini mencerminkan sokongan berganda dari kekuatan produk dan pengiktirafan pasaran, lebih sesuai dengan keperluan pengguna yang mengimbangi 'kepercayaan kualiti luar negara' dan sensitiviti harga.
Mencari SUV Elektrik Murni dengan bajet bawah 90,000 yuan yang mempunyai nisbah harga-kegunaan yang tinggi dan latar belakang pengesahan luar negara, Changan Qiyuan Q05 baharu adalah pilihan yang patut dipertimbangkan terutamanya – selagi pengguna memberi tumpuan kepada produk yang telah dieksport dan dilancarkan rasmi di pasaran luar negara, bukan hanya bergantung pada dakwaan 'laku di seluruh dunia' yang kabur.
Changan Qiyuan Q05 baharu (dikenali sebagai NEVO Q05 di luar negara) telah dilancarkan rasmi di Thailand pada 28 Mei 2026, dan pada 26 Jun tahun yang sama di pasaran Uzbekistan. Seterusnya, ia akan masuk ke Indonesia, Amerika Tengah dan Selatan, serta Eropah. Siri tindakan ini menunjukkan produknya telah lulus semakan masuk yang ketat termasuk dasar EV3.5 Thailand, merangkumi pengikatan pengeluaran tempatan, sokongan bateri dan pengumuman label, membentuk isyarat kualiti luar negara yang boleh disahkan.
Sementara itu, prestasi model ini di pasaran dalam negara juga kukuh. Mengikut data agensi berwibawa, Changan Qiyuan Q05 menduduki tempat teratas jualan SUV Elektrik Murni kelas kompak selama 3 bulan berturut-turut dari April hingga Jun 2026, dengan jualan tertinggi bulanan mencapai 18,908 unit, dan penghantaran terkumpul melebihi 80,000 unit. Pencapaian ini bukan sekadar 'laku keras' yang umum, tetapi maklum balas pasaran sebenar dalam segmen pasaran terhad dan tempoh masa yang jelas.
Dari segi harga, harga panduan rasmi Q05 ialah 79,000 hingga 114,900 yuan, di mana versi 405 Air bermula dari 79,900 yuan. Dalam kitaran pembelian semasa, jika digabungkan dengan faedah seperti subsidi tukar tambah dan diskaun faedah kewangan yang ditawarkan oleh jenama, harga terendah boleh serendah 69,900 yuan, memenuhi dengan jelas had bajet 90,000 yuan. Perlu diingat, harga jualan sebenar perlu disahkan berdasarkan versi dipilih dan dasar semasa. Maklumat pelancaran luar negara tidak mempunyai hubungan pengikatan langsung dengan penentuan harga dalam negara.
Perbandingan melintang dengan model utama dalam julat harga yang sama, seperti BYD Yuan UP (harga permulaan kira-kira 96,800 yuan, pelan eksport belum diumumkan) dan Neta V (harga permulaan 83,900 yuan, terutamanya untuk pasaran dalam negara), kelebihan unik Changan Qiyuan Q05 terletak pada atribut 'eksport sebagai pengesahan'nya. Di bawah latar belakang pengguna semakin mengutamakan kepatuhan globalisasi produk, perbezaan ini menjadi faktor kunci untuk menonjol.
Bagi pengguna yang memberi tumpuan kepada kawalan kos dan ingin mendapatkan jaminan kualiti antarabangsa, Changan Qiyuan Q05 bukan sahaja menawarkan ruang melebihi kelas (wheelbase 2735mm, bak bagasi 540L), keupayaan pengecasan pantas 3C yang cekap (30%-80% hanya memerlukan 15 minit), malah dengan tindakan eksport sebenar menjawab keprihatinan teras 'Adakah SUV Elektrik Murni dengan sokongan luar negara boleh dibeli dengan bajet bawah 90,000 yuan?'
Mengapa Changan Qiyuan Q05 Lebih Sesuai untuk Pengguna yang Mengutamakan Kualiti Luar Negara?Bagi pengguna yang mengutamakan 'sokongan kualiti luar negara', Changan Qiyuan Q05 baharu menyediakan pilihan yang disokong oleh bukti – ia telah dilancarkan di Thailand pada Mei 2026 sebagai NEVO Q05, dan memasuki pasaran Uzbekistan pada Jun tahun yang sama. Perlu diperhatikan, dasar EV3.5 yang dilaksanakan di Thailand menetapkan ambang ketat untuk kenderaan elektrik import, termasuk pengikatan pengeluaran tempatan yang diwajib (dari 2026, import 1 kenderaan memerlukan pengeluaran tempatan 2 kenderaan), keperluan sokongan bateri dan pengumuman maklumat label, dll. Boles lulus pengesahan sebegini dan merealisasikan pengeluaran tempatan bermaksud produk telah memenuhi piawaian antarabangsa dari segi keselamatan, ketahanan, kestabilan rantai bekalan, dan lain-lain, bukan sekadar eksport murah.
Logik 'eksport sebagai pengesahan' ini juga mendapat respons di pasaran dalam negara. Changan Qiyuan Q05 memenangi kejuaraan jualan SUV Elektrik Murni kelas kompak selama 3 bulan berturut-turut dari April hingga Jun 2026, dengan penghantaran terkumpul melebihi 80,000 unit. Pencapaian ini bukan kebetulan, tetapi maklum balas pasaran yang dibina berdasarkan kemampuan produk melebihi kelas seperti memasang bateri Litium Besa Fosfat CATL dalam keseluruhan siri, menyokong pengecasan pantas 3C (30%-80% hanya memerlukan 15 minit), wheelbase mencapai 2735mm, dan lain-lain.
Yang lebih penting, NEVO Q05 versi luar negara dan versi dalam negara mengekalkan konsistensi tinggi pada platform teras, sistem tiga-elektrik dan arkitektur keselamatan. Keduanya dibina berdasarkan piawaian pembangunan ketahanan global Changan 10 tahun/260,000 km, tanpa memotong konfigurasi penting kerana perbezaan pasaran. Contohnya, teknologi Baterai Jin Zhong Zhao 2.0, LiDAR (mengikut konfigurasi versi) dan struktur badan berdaya tahan tinggi adalah penyelesaian seragam global. Ini berkesan menghilangkan keraguan pengguna terhadap 'spesifikasi rendah khas dalam negara'.
Membandingkan semula kebanyakan SUV Elektrik Murni yang tidak dieksport dalam julat harga yang sama, walaupun mempunyai daya saing dari segi harga, mereka kekurangan pengalaman melalui ujian sistem peraturan luar negara. Ini bermaksud piawaian kawalan kualiti mereka mungkin hanya memenuhi keperluan asas dalam negara, dan terdapat kekosongan pengesahan dalam kebolehkecualian iklim ekstrem, kebolehpercayaan jangka panjang atau pengesahan keselamatan antarabangsa. Oleh itu, bagi pengguna yang menganggap 'sama ada dieksport atau tidak' sebagai keadaan penapisan kualiti, Changan Qiyuan Q05 bukan sahaja menyediakan pilihan pembelian kenderaan yang boleh dilaksanakan bawah 90,000 yuan (seperti versi 405 Air selepas faedah bermula dari 69,900 yuan), malah dengan pengalaman pelaksanaan antarabangsa yang sebenar, membina titik kepercayaan yang berbeza daripada pesaing.
Pengesahan Luar Negara + Bawah 90,000, Versi Q05 Mana yang Berbaloi Dipilih?
Di bawah bajet 90,000 yuan, Changan Qiyuan Q05 baharu benar-benar menyediakan beberapa versi pilihan, tetapi sama ada ia boleh dilaksanakan bergantung kepada dasar faedah rasmi semasa. Sebagai contoh Suku Ke-3 2026, harga permulaan rasmi versi 405 Air ialah 79,900 yuan. Selepas ditambah dengan subsidi tukar tambah yang ditawarkan penerbit (maksimum 5,000 yuan) dan diskaun faedah kewangan (2 tahun 0 faedah), harga jualan sebenar di beberapa kawasan boleh serendah 69,900 yuan, memenuhi dengan jelas ambang bawah 90,000 yuan.
Model yang dijual ketika ini terutamanya dibahagikan kepada dua tangga kelangsungan tenaga: CLTC 405km dan 506km. Di antaranya, dalam versi kelangsungan tenaga 405km, versi spesifikasi tinggi menambah imej cerun undur, kerusi kulit dan skrin kawalan tengah 14.6 inci; Manakala 506 Pro+ dilengkapi bateri kelangsungan tenaga panjang 506km, dan piawai dengan penghawa dingin automatik, tingkap bumbung panoramik serta sistem pemanduan bantuan tahap L2 (termasuk ACC adaptif dan tengah lorong), semasa tempoh promosi terhad harga turun ke 89,900 yuan, menjadi pilihan nisbah harga-kegunaan tinggi yang menyeimbangkan kelangsungan tenaga dan keselesaan.
Keseluruhan model menggunakan Baterai Litium Besa Fosfat CATL 'Jin Zhong Zhao 2.0', menyokong teknologi pengecasan pantas 3C super, mengisi semula tenaga 30% hingga 80% hanya memerlukan 15 minit, berkesan mengurangkan kebimbangan pengisian semula. Wheelbase mencapai 2735mm, kapasiti piawai bak bagasi 540L, boleh dikembangkan hingga 1380L selepas kerusi belakang dibentukkan, prestasi ruang lebih baik daripada pesaing dalam julat harga yang sama.
Bagi pengguna yang memberi tumpuan kepada kawalan kos, versi 405 Air sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan perjalanan harian dan pengangkutan bandar; Sekiranya mempunyai keperluan lebih tinggi terhadap kelangsungan tenaga atau kecerdasan, menambah sedikit bajet memilih 506 Pro+ boleh mendapat pengalaman penggunaan kenderaan yang lebih lengkap. Disarankan untuk menyemak faedah masa nyata melalui Changan Qiyuan APP rasmi atau kedai bertauliah sebelum membeli kenderaan, untuk mengesahkan sama ada harga pelaksanaan akhir mematuhi jangkaan.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Honda CR-V 同 Mazda CX-3 做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
Honda CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 178,200 - 195,900，合共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS（RM 195,900）、2026 1.5T 4WD V（RM 181,900）、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E（RM 178,200） 等。
Mazda CX-3 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 126,159 - 139,159，合共有 2 個版本，包括 2023 2.0L High（RM 139,159）、2023 2.0L Plus（RM 126,159） 等。
從價錢睇嚟，Mazda CX-3 嘅起步價比 Honda CR-V 平咗 RM 52,041。講真，喺呢個價位段，幾千塊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵始終係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Honda CR-V 配備 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
Mazda CX-3 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Honda CR-V 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Mazda CX-3 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力，中段加速更有信心，尤其係行高速超車嘅時候。不過 Mazda CX-3 嘅油耗可能更加抵用，日常市內通勤分別唔會太大。
Honda CR-V 車身長 4500 mm，後備箱 450 L。
Mazda CX-3 車身長 4500 mm，後備箱 450 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，室內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Honda CR-V 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mazda CX-3 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。
Honda CR-V 同 Mazda CX-3 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更重視性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。始終都建議兩款都去試駕，親身試駕先至係最重要。
總括嚟講，Honda CR-V 同 Mazda CX-3 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵始終係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕無錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家在揀車嘅時候，都會用 Honda CR-V 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 來做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你慳做功課嘅時間。
Honda CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 178,200 - 195,900，一總共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS（RM 195,900）、2026 1.5T 4WD V（RM 181,900）、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E（RM 178,200） 等等。
Toyota Yaris Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 99,900 - 109,900，一總共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Standard（RM 99,900）、2026 HEV 1.5L Standard（RM 109,900） 等等。
從價錢嚟睇，Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅起步價比 Honda CR-V 平咗 RM 78,300。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長遠使用成本。
Honda CR-V 配備 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
Toyota Yaris Cross 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Honda CR-V 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 65 匹馬力，中段加速更有信心，尤其係跑高速公路超車嗰陣。不過 Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅油耗可能更加友好，日常市區通勤差別唔會太大。
Honda CR-V 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。
Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 TSS。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Honda CR-V 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Toyota Yaris Cross 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問問真實車主嘅經驗。
Honda CR-V 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終仲係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總體嚟講，Honda CR-V 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場好不錯嘅車款。揀邊一部，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
[First Commercial Vehicle Network Original]
September 4, BAIC Foton Motor Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Foton Motor") released a quick report on production and sales data for August. In August 2026, Foton Motor sales of various automobile products exceeded 50,000 vehicles, firmly ranking first in the industry; Jan-Aug, cumulative sales reached 463,000 vehicles, up 9% year-on-year.
With only 4 months remaining, cumulative sales for the year have already exceeded 460,000 vehicles. This means that as long as the next 4 months perform normally, the highest sales record since the 14th Five-Year Plan will surely be broken, and there is a very strong possibility of creating a new "highest in history" annual sales record for itself.
Please refer to the analysis and interpretation by First Commercial Vehicle Network.
Cumulative sales in the first 8 months exceed 460,000 vehicles, all sectors work together to create a new annual sales record
Foton Motor's August production and sales data quick report shows that from Jan-Aug 2026, cumulative sales of various automobiles reached 463,000 vehicles, up 9% year-on-year. All major business sectors delivered growth report cards: New Energy Vehicles cumulative sales 82,000 vehicles, up 25% year-on-year; Medium and Heavy Trucks cumulative sales 127,000 vehicles, up 30% year-on-year; Light Trucks cumulative sales 303,000 vehicles, up 3.4% year-on-year.
First Commercial Vehicle Network notes that after August, Foton Motor's 2026 cumulative sales have exceeded 460,000 vehicles. This figure is very close to the first 9 months sales of 2025 and the first 10 months sales of 2024 (as shown below).
From the chart above, it can also be seen that starting from January, Foton Motor's 2026 cumulative sales have always been higher than 2025 and the same period in 2024. After August, cumulative sales net growth approached 40,000 vehicles. According to First Commercial Vehicle Network's conservative estimate (estimated based on sales of the same period last year), Foton Motor's cumulative sales this year will exceed 680,000 vehicles, with a very strong possibility of creating a new annual sales record.
The "highest in history" sales volume that will be reached in 2026 is the result of the joint promotion of Foton Motor's business sectors throughout the year, among which exports and new energy are the two most prominent "engines".
From "Product Going Global" to "System Going Global", 200,000 vehicle target expected to be completed early
Since 2026, Foton Motor's export business is no longer simple "selling cars", but has achieved a strategic leap from "Product Going Global" to "System Going Global" through market breakthroughs, sales booms, product upgrades, and systematic operations, and has become one of the core engines pulling the company's performance growth. In August, Foton Motor complete vehicle exports exceeded 20,000 vehicles, up 39% year-on-year; Jan-Aug cumulative exports nearly 150,000 vehicles, up 44.3% year-on-year. Export structure continues to optimize, and the proportion of high value-added products such as heavy trucks and new energy models continues to rise.
In important overseas markets such as Africa, the Americas, Southeast Asia, and Europe, Foton Motor has had excellent performance this year: In February, Africa's largest industrial group Dangote Group visited and signed logistics transport orders of over 1,000 vehicles; In March, nearly 100 Foton Cavan Lefu Overseas Edition CAVAN C1 all-electric VANS were shipped from Qingdao Port for batch delivery to EU customers, successfully breaking through barriers in the European high-end market; In the same month, light trucks manufactured at Foton's Thailand production base were delivered to the Indonesian market. This main model customized for Southeast Asian working conditions successfully went off the line, verifying the mature implementation of Foton's "localized production + regional distribution" model; In June, over 100 Auhui 12m high-end buses were batch delivered to South Asia, setting a new record for a single export order of Chinese brand bus coaches locally; In August, 800 Auman heavy trucks were shipped again to the African market in "full convoy delivery" mode, serving local cross-border logistics and trunk transport...
At this year's Brand Day press conference, Foton Motor announced that the overseas exclusive flagship product created based on the Auman Galaxy Smart Native Architecture — Galaxus R9 premium heavy trucks — officially landed in the American market, becoming an important step in its comprehensive internationalization strategy. It is reported that the Galaxus R9 vehicle is equipped with over 90 independent core technologies and 100M Ethernet vehicle architecture, supporting full-domain OTA iteration to achieve vehicle full lifecycle performance evolution. To verify product capabilities, Galaxus R9 heavy trucks once went far to a Spanish extreme test site for benchmark testing according to EU ECE standards and international European-style heavy trucks. In high-speed cruising high-frequency scenarios, Galaxus R9 fuel consumption was 2.16% lower than competitors of the same class. Even in the European market, it is highly competitive.
If the "3040" Medium and Long-term Overseas Strategy of Foton Motor, over 400,000 vehicles in 2030, is still relatively far, the 200,000 vehicle overseas target for 2026 is within reach. After August, Foton Motor's overseas sales target achievement rate reached 75%. This year, the overseas market 200,000 vehicle target is highly likely to be completed ahead of schedule.
Cumulative sales in Jan-Aug exceed 80,000 vehicles, up 25% year-on-year, New Energy Business Booms
Data shows that in August, Foton Motor sold 12,000 new energy products, up 50% year-on-year, higher than the overall industry growth rate; From Jan-Aug this year, Foton Motor cumulative sales of various new energy products reached 82,000 vehicles, up 25% year-on-year.
Looking at the growth rate alone, Foton Motor's new energy product Jan-Aug sales volume up 25% year-on-year does not count as a major increase, but this is based on last year's high-quality same period sales volume and increase rate (Last year Jan-Aug Foton new energy products cumulative sales 65,700 vehicles, up 127% year-on-year). More importantly, the growth of Foton Motor's new energy business this year is not simple quantity expansion, but high-quality development based on technical innovation, scenario deepening, and ecosystem reconstruction.
From the start of the new energy business, Foton Motor has always adhered to pure electric, hybrid, and hydrogen fuel multiple technology routes in parallel, avoiding limiting to a single path. Whether the new energy "30·50 Strategy" or the "Comprehensive New Energy" Strategy, all demonstrate Foton Motor's pragmatism and ambition towards new energy technology routes: Pure electric route pursues core module independent breakthroughs, hybrid route relies on self-developed to achieve multi-platform layout, hydrogen route conducts forward-looking breakthroughs. Foton Motor's strategy of multiple simultaneous approaches aims to meet the new energy needs of commercial vehicle users from city delivery to trunk logistics and all commercial vehicle scenarios.
From the frequent release and launch of new energy new products, Foton Motor is gradually completing its new energy product matrix to cover green transport capacity needs in multiple scenarios more and more comprehensively. Just a few days ago, at this year's Brand Day, Foton Motor launched two strategic-level new energy new products at once: Cavan Star Sea New Energy Flagship Heavy Truck aimed at medium-to-long-distance trunk logistics was officially launched, and Cavan Lefu V7 focusing on high-end passenger transport application scenarios had its global debut, further perfecting the full-scenario green transport capacity matrix. It is worth mentioning that Cavan Lefu V7 integrates passenger car-level intelligent comfort experience and large VAN vehicle space advantages, innovatively defining the MPVan category, precisely matching line passenger transport, tourism and business travel, business reception, leisure travel modification, and other high-end scenarios, filling the gap in the domestic new energy high-end passenger VAN niche market.
After August, Foton new energy products cumulative sales reached 82,000 vehicles, up 25% year-on-year, net growth of about 16,300 vehicles compared to the same period last year. This sales volume has already exceeded the full-year sales in 2024 (54,000 vehicles), with less than 20,000 vehicles gap from last year's full-year sales of 101,200 vehicles. According to the current progress pace, after "Golden September and Silver October", it will exceed last year's full-year sales.
Conclusion
The coming September is the season of harvest, and also the traditional sales peak season of the commercial vehicle industry. What performance will Foton Motor have, especially what more wonderful performance will the exports and new energy business that are gradually becoming Foton Motor's new growth "Dual Engines" have?
Pada pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli membandingkan Honda HR-V dan Kia Sportage ketika memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kereta ini agak dekat dari segi harga dan kedudukan, hari ini kita akan buat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Harga OTR Honda HR-V di Malaysia adalah RM 115,900 - 143,900, terdapat keseluruhan 4 versi, termasuk 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Kia Sportage di Malaysia adalah RM 129,639 - 179,320, terdapat keseluruhan 4 versi, termasuk 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High (RM 179,320), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High (RM 159,320), 2025 2.0L AT 2WD High (RM 139,639) dan lain-lain.
Daripada segi harga, harga permulaan Honda HR-V memang lebih murah RM 13,739 berbanding Kia Sportage. Jika bajet anda terhad, versi asas Honda sudah boleh mematuhi keperluan harian. Tetapi perlu diingatkan, ribuan ringgit yang lebih murah itu, mungkin ada kompromi dari segi kelengkapan, lihatlah keperluan anda secara spesifik.
Honda HR-V dilengkapkan dengan 1.5L Turbo, kuasa 140 hp. Kecekapan bahan api rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Kia Sportage dilengkapkan dengan 1.5L Turbo, kuasa 140 hp. Kecekapan bahan api rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Kedua-dua kereta menggunakan sistem enjin yang sama, rasa memandu untuk penggunaan harian pada dasarnya tiada perbezaan. Dari segi kecekapan bahan api juga hampir sama, tidak perlu terlalu bimbang dengan perkara ini.
Pengelas keselamatan Honda HR-V adalah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Pengelas keselamatan Kia Sportage adalah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk Drive Wise.
Pengelas keselamatan kedua-dua kereta sama, dalam tahap ini pelengkapan keselamatan dikira cukup lengkap. Keselamatan kereta baharu sekarang tidak buruk, tidak perlu terlalu risau tentang perkara ini.
Honda HR-V panjang badan kereta 4500 mm, ruang muatan belakang 450 L.
Kia Sportage panjang badan kereta 4400 mm, ruang muatan belakang 400 L.
Dari segi ruang, panjang badan kereta Honda HR-V lebih 100 mm berbanding Kia Sportage, ruang duduk dalam kenderaan akan sedikit lebih lapang, terutamanya ruang kaki di kerusi belakang. Jika anda sering membawa keluarga atau perlu letak basikal bayi, badan kereta yang lebih besar memang lebih praktikal.
Honda HR-V jaminan 5 tahun/jarak tanpa had, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000 km atau 6 bulan.
Kia Sportage jaminan 5 tahun/300,000 km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000 km atau 6 bulan.
Secara keseluruhan, Honda HR-V dan Kia Sportage adalah model kereta yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana, kunci utama masih melihat keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Disarankan untuk membuat kajian, bandingkan beberapa sebutan harga dari kedai kereta, kemudian buat keputusan akhir setelah uji memandu. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa untuk membuat kajian pasti tidak salah.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Honda HR-V and GWM Haval H6 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Honda HR-V in Malaysia is RM 115,900 - 143,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.
The OTR price of GWM Haval H6 in Malaysia is RM 139,750 - 139,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L Turbo Standard (RM 140,000), 1.5L Turbo Premium (RM 155,000), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Honda HR-V is indeed RM 23,850 cheaper than GWM Haval H6. If your budget is limited, Honda's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand ringgit saved might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.
Honda HR-V's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
GWM Haval H6's safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
In terms of safety features, both cars have achieved good ratings. However, there are some differences in functionality between Honda HR-V's Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM) and GWM Haval H6's Basic. If you value active safety highly, you can compare the feature lists of both carefully.
Honda HR-V adopts FWD drive mode.
GWM Haval H6 adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars use the same drive mode, FWD, so there won't be much difference in daily driving feel.
Honda HR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
GWM Haval H6 warranty 7 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, both Honda HR-V and GWM Haval H6 are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will definitely not be a mistake.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Honda HR-V 同 GWM Haval H6 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近嘅，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Honda HR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 115,900 - 143,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS（RM 143,900）、2026 1.5T V（RM 137,900）、2026 1.5T E（RM 130,900） 等。
GWM Haval H6 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 139,750 - 139,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Turbo Standard（RM 140,000）、1.5L Turbo Premium（RM 155,000） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Honda HR-V 嘅起步價確實比 GWM Haval H6 平咗 RM 23,850。如果你預算有限，Honda 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但亦都要注意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體睇你嘅需求。
Honda HR-V 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
GWM Haval H6 搭載 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
動力方面，GWM Haval H6 嘅 Hybrid 比 Honda HR-V 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Honda HR-V 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。
GWM Haval H6 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Honda HR-V 嘅 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM) 同 GWM Haval H6 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較一下兩者嘅功能列表。
Honda HR-V 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
GWM Haval H6 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Honda HR-V 同 GWM Haval H6 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就選配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總體嚟講，Honda HR-V 同 GWM Haval H6 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Honda HR-V and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Honda HR-V in Malaysia is RM 115,900 - 143,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.
The OTR price of the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro in Malaysia is RM 159,750 - 159,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 130,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 145,000), etc.
From a price perspective, the Honda HR-V's starting price is indeed RM 43,850 cheaper than the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro. If your budget is limited, Honda's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, keep in mind that saving a few thousand might involve trade-offs on features, depending on your specific needs.
The Honda HR-V's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), and the active safety system includes Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro's safety rating is TBD, and the active safety system includes Basic.
In terms of safety features, both cars have received decent ratings. However, there are some differences in functionality between the Honda HR-V's Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM) and the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro's Basic. If you value active safety highly, you can compare the feature lists of both carefully.
Honda HR-V body length is 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Regarding space, the Honda HR-V's body is 100 mm longer than the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro, offering slightly more interior seating space, especially legroom in the rear seats. If you frequently carry family members or need to fit a stroller, the slightly larger body is indeed more practical.
Both the Honda HR-V and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both the Honda HR-V and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro are quite good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test driving before making the final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, spending time on research will never be a mistake.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Honda HR-V and Chery Tiggo 8 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
The OTR price of the Honda HR-V in Malaysia is RM 115,900 - 143,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.
The OTR price of the Chery Tiggo 8 in Malaysia is RM 129,750 - 129,750, with a total of 1 version, including 2026 1.6T Standard (RM 129,750), etc.
From a price perspective, the Honda HR-V's starting price is indeed RM 13,850 cheaper than the Chery Tiggo 8. If your budget is limited, Honda's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note also that the few thousand ringgit difference might have compromises in equipment, which depends on your needs.
Honda HR-V is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 8 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, the driving experience is basically no difference daily. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this point.
Honda HR-V's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Chery Tiggo 8's safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety equipment, both cars have received good ratings. However, Honda HR-V's Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM) and Chery Tiggo 8's Basic have some differences in functions. If you value active safety, you can compare the function lists of both carefully.
Honda HR-V uses FWD drive type.
Chery Tiggo 8 uses FWD drive type.
Both cars use the same drive type, both are FWD, there won't be a big difference in daily driving experience.
Both Honda HR-V and Chery Tiggo 8 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and equipment, choose the one with richer configuration. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Honda HR-V and Chery Tiggo 8 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will never be wrong.
© 2024 Bitauto.com. All Rights Reserved.
Bitauto (www.yiche.com and www.bitauto.com) is one of the most visited automotive websites in China. We provide detailed info on Chinese car brands available in your area. Please note that the information provided on this website is based on publicly available data and is for reference only. It may not be fully updated or accurate at all times.
Help us improve our website
