汽車說刊訊 | 8 月 12 日,奇瑞風雲系列全新全球品質純電 SUV 風雲 T7 正式開啟預售,預售發布會以“慢功造好車,久等了”為核心主題,直面當下新能源行業“速成造車”亂象,拋出“全球車快不了一點“的行業思考。

新車推出 3 款版型,預售指導價 10.99 萬 -12.99 萬元,同步釋放 7 重購車權益,用全球嚴苛標準、五年打磨週期、六大剛需全能產品力,為 10-13 萬級家用純電 SUV 樹立全新品質標杆。
如今全球汽車產業正式邁入“中國時間”,中國新能源車型憑藉智造實力持續反向出海,但行業內部分品牌急於搶佔市場,壓縮研發、測試週期,催生大量“速成車”,續航虛標、車身耐久性不足、極端工況可靠性差等問題,不斷消耗消費者信任。
在此行業背景下,風雲 T7 走出一條反向出海試煉路線:依托奇瑞 23 年全球化技術積澱,2 年策劃、3 年研發,投入 81 輛專屬耐久車完成超 600 萬公里整車測試,145 萬公里專項耐久試煉,奔赴東南亞雨季、中東高溫、印尼高濕等全球多地域極限環境實車驗證,歷經海外市場嚴苛考驗后才回歸國內市場,用充足時間打磨一台真正適配全球路況、滿足家庭全場景需求的純電 SUV。

風雲 T7 跳出單純堆砌配置的造車思路,精準捕捉當代家庭購車六大核心剛需:顏值、安全、出行、智能、舒享、安心,將家用出行的全部痛點一一化解,實現通勤、長途自駕、戶外露營、多人家庭出行全場景適配。
顏值層面,新車融合全球審美與東方雅韻,依托奇瑞 10 大全球設計中心,聯合 5000 餘名海内外用戶共創,同源車型 LepasL6 登陸米蘭設計週斬獲國際認可。
馭風前脸、風塑絲綢車身搭配天際霞光尾門,極簡線條兼具國際潮流與東方溫潤氣韻;整車漆面對標海外耐候標準,提供熾焰橙、山煙紫、雲粉米等 6 款專屬配色,長期暴曬不易老化褪色。

內飾提供溫暖黑棕、極夜黑曜雙風格,雲翼環抱座艙鋪滿大面積軟包覆,鵝卵石懸浮揚聲器、菱格縫製細節盡顯精緻;全車內飾塑料、皮革、密封件經過長效耐老化測試,常年使用不易硬化褪色,從根源解決家用車內飾老舊難看的痛點。
安全是家用車不可退讓的底線,風雲 T7 直接對標 2026 版 E-NCAP 五星安全標準,功能安全達到 ASILD 最高等級。車身採用 80% 高強度鋼、18.84% 熱成型鋼打造九橫五縱籠式車身,搭配 Shotgun 結構、雙框副車架與電池防撞梁,前置 9 條、側面 6 條碰撞傳力通道,最大限度吸收撞擊能量。

全系標配 9 安全氣囊,包含 48L 雙腔遠端氣囊與後排側氣囊,360 度覆蓋車內乘員。動力電池搭載犀牛電池 6D 立體防護體系,IP68 防水等級為國標 96 倍,無懼城市內澇、涉水路段,多層防護抵禦擠壓、穿刺、高溫衝擊,徹底打消用戶電池安全焦慮。
針對純電用戶最關心的出行續航痛點,風雲 T7 實現全系續航平權,拒絕高低配續航差異化割韭菜。全系標配 65.05kWh 犀牛電池,CLTC 標準續航 600km,實車測試續航可達 667km,反向虛標解決里程焦慮。
快充性能亮眼,電量 30% 充至 80% 僅需 20 分鐘,短途補能高效便捷。整車搭載全域一體化雙源寬熱泵空調 + 高壓 PTC,-30℃至 55℃超寬溫域穩定工作,北方冬季制熱省電、南方高溫散熱穩定。
搭配 AGS 智能進氣格柵與 14 項低風阻優化,高低速能耗表現均衡,無論嚴寒酷暑都能穩定出行。
智能維度,風雲 T7 搭載同級領先艙駕一體 8775 芯片,4nm 製程、72TOPS 高算力,系統響應僅 80ms,開機速度提升 33%,座艙與智駕兩大域無縫協同,做到“一半懂你,一半護你”。

15.6 吋 2.5K 防眩光高清大螢幕支持無線 CarPlay、華為 HiCar,覆蓋市面絕大多數手機互聯;靈犀智艙 2.0 搭載六大真人感語音人設,內置小憩、露營、寵物、醒神六大专屬場景模式,讓車輛成為有溫度的移動空間。

智駕端配備獵鷹 500 駕駛輔助系統,3 顆毫米波雷達 +7 顆高清攝像頭 +12 個超音波雷達,合計 22 顆高精度傳感器,支持 300+ 全場景自動泊車,斷頭路泊車、跨樓層泊車、一鍵循跡倒車全部實現,徹底解決家用車主停車難題。

空間與舒適是家庭用戶核心訴求,風雲 T7 車身尺寸 4570×1852×1694mm,軸距 2700mm,車內空間得房率高達 84%,後排純平地台,腿部空間 911mm,後排座椅放倒後形成 1955mm 純平大床;常規後備箱 450L,拓展容積可達 1550L,露營裝備、大件行李輕鬆容納。
9 層雲感座椅軟硬適中,標配通風、加熱雙功能,低溫環境 5 分鐘即可升溫至 30℃,吸風式通風杜絕夏季后背悶汗;全車 38 處精細化儲物空間,搭配 4 個 300kg 承重鉚環、2 個承重鉤鉤,戶外出行裝載固定無憂。

底盤由瑪莎拉蒂前底盤調校專家領銜國際團隊打磨,50.8:49.2 黃金軸荷比抑制推頭、甩尾,結合奇瑞 26 年底盤研發積累,兼顧城市通勤平順與山路操控穩定。
購車與用車層面,風雲 T7 推出兩大兜底保障 + 兩項終身權益,全週期打消用戶後顧之憂。兩大兜底極具誠意:動力電池因自身故障引發熱失控損毀,直接賠付同款新車。
購車一年內,智能輔助駕駛系統故障引發事故,最高 500 萬第三者與人傷賠付。兩項終身權益含金量十足:整車含三電終身質保(易損件除外),價值萬元;僅需 666 元即可購入原價 3999 元終身基礎保養套餐,每年一次基礎保養,大幅降低長期養車成本。
從全球設計研發、多地域極限試煉,到嚴苛製造工藝、全週期用車保障,風雲 T7 完整走完“全球標準打磨 - 海外市場驗證 - 回歸國內家庭”的完整鏈路,用五年深耕詮釋奇瑞長期主義造車初心,針對當代家庭六大出行剛需全方位彌補產品短板,在 10 萬級純電 SUV 市場打出差異化競爭力。

新車點評:
縱觀當下 10-13 萬純電 SUV 市場,多數車型要么偏重續航、忽視安全舒適,要么堆砌智能配置、縮減底盤與車身用料,而風雲 T7 跳出同質化內捲,以“慢造好車”的底層邏輯實現均衡無短板。
在行業追逐快速上新、壓縮研發週期的浮躁環境下,風雲 T7 選擇沉下心用數百萬公里測試、全球多地域試煉打磨產品,是自主品牌全球化技術沉澱的一次集中釋放。
10.99 萬起的預售價格,疊加無短板的綜合產品力與誠意滿滿的用車權益,風雲 T7 精準擊中追求品質、看重長期用車價值的家庭用戶,有望成為緊湊級純電 SUV 市場的爆款黑馬,也為新能源行業樹立“以品質為先”的全新发展範本。

慢功造好车!奇瑞风云T7预售10.99万起,六大刚需拉满全球品质
8 月 12 日,奇瑞风云 T7 正式开启预售,发布会以 “慢功造好车,久等了” 为核心主题,传递奇瑞长期主义造车初心。依托 23 年全球化技术积淀,新车走反向出海试炼路线,以严苛全球标准打磨产品,推出 3 款版型,预售区间 10.99-12.99 万元,下单即享 7 重超值购车权益,兼顾亲民定价与越级产品力。

当下新能源产业进入 “中国主场”,奇瑞风云 T7 跳出速成造车思维,围绕当代家庭六大用车刚需打造全能纯电 SUV,通勤、长途自驾、户外露营、全家出行全场景适配,从颜值、安全、续航、智能、空间、售后六大维度全方位突破。
颜值刚需:融汇东西方美学,久用依旧如新
依托奇瑞十大全球设计中心,联合五千余名用户共创,同源车型登陆米兰设计周斩获国际认可。风云 T7 打造驭风前脸 + 风塑绸缎车身 + 天际霞光贯穿尾灯,简约国际范融合东方温润气韵。
车身同步海外耐候车漆标准,提供炽焰橙、山烟紫、云粉米等 6 款潮流配色;内饰提供温暖黑棕、极夜黑曜两套座舱风格,大面积软包覆搭配菱格绗缝、鹅卵石悬浮音响,精致感拉满。全车内饰塑料、皮革、密封条抗老化抗褪色,常年使用不易显旧。


安全刚需:对标五星标准,全车无死角防护
整车按照 2026 版 E-NCAP 五星安全标准开发,功能安全达 ASILD 最高等级。历经 5 年研发、81 台耐久车同步路试,总测试里程超 600 万公里,远赴东南亚、中东、印尼完成高温、高湿、雨季涉水极限试炼。
车身采用 80% 高强度钢 + 18.84% 热成型钢打造九横五纵笼式结构,9 前 6 侧多重碰撞传力通道,搭配 9 安全气囊(含 48L 双腔远端气囊);全系标配犀牛动力电池,6D 立体防护,IP68 级防水防护能力为国标 96 倍,暴雨涉水、城市内涝无惧电池短路。
出行刚需:全系 600km 续航平权,告别里程焦虑
风云 T7 实现续航配置全系平等,统一搭载 65.05kWh 犀牛电池,CLTC 标准续航 600km,实际实测续航超 667km,实打实反向虚标。快充性能亮眼,30%-80% 电量仅需 20 分钟,短途补能无需久等。
搭载双源宽热泵空调搭配高压 PTC,-30℃至 55℃超宽温域稳定工作,北方冬季制热省电、南方酷暑散热高效;配合 AGS 主动进气格栅与 14 项低风阻优化,高低速能耗表现稳定,适配全球各类气候路况。

智能刚需:4nm 高算力芯片,座舱智驾双在线
新车搭载舱驾一体 8775 芯片,4nm 制程、72TOPS 算力,系统响应仅 80ms,开机速度提升 33%,操作流畅无卡顿。
智能座舱配备 15.6 英寸 2.5K 防眩光大屏,无线支持 CarPlay、华为 HiCar 等全品类手机互联;灵犀智舱 2.0 内置多风格 AI 语音助手,自带小憩、露营、宠物六大专属场景模式。
猎鹰 500 智驾系统搭载 22 颗高精度传感器,支持 300 + 场景全自动泊车,断头路泊车、循迹倒车、跨楼层泊车轻松实现,彻底解决停车难题。

舒享刚需:大空间大师底盘,全家出行超安逸
车身尺寸 4570×1852×1694mm,轴距 2700mm,车内得房率 84%,后排纯平地台,腿部空间可达 911mm;常规后备箱 450L,后排放倒拓展至 1550L,形成 1955mm 纯平大床,露营休憩、大件装载毫无压力。
9 层云感座椅自带通风、3 档加热功能,低温 5 分钟快速升温;全车 38 处储物格,车内标配承重铆环与挂钩,露营装备轻松固定。底盘由玛莎拉蒂前调校专家带队打磨,50.8:49.2 黄金轴荷比,过弯稳定、行驶质感高级,依托奇瑞多年 K&C 底盘试验技术,驾乘舒适度远超同级。


安心刚需:四大兜底终身权益,用车全程无忧
购车即享双重兜底保障 + 两项终身权益,彻底打消养车、用车顾虑:
两大兜底保障
两大终身权益

从全球设计、全球研发、全球路试到全球制造,奇瑞风云 T7 以全链路全球化品质,打造十万级纯电 SUV 价值标杆。不做速成车,只造经得起岁月与全球路况考验的家用 SUV,用颜值、安全、续航、智能、舒适、售后六大刚需实力,满足中国品质家庭全部出行期待。目前新车已开启预售,静待用户到店体验。

如今选购家用纯电 SUV,很多消费者都会遇到一个普遍难题:市场车型大多存在“配置割裂”现象。想要长续航,往往就要牺牲部分智能配置;看重车身安全,又需要额外加价上高配,续航、安全、空间、智驾、舒适等核心优势,很难在一台家用车上完整兼得,消费者买车总要不断取舍、被动妥协。

8月12日,奇瑞风云T7正式开启预售。新车以“慢功造好车,久等了”为理念,秉持长期主义造车初心,不跟风行业速成内卷,踏踏实实打磨产品品质。依托奇瑞全球制造体系,风云T7按照全球研发标准打造,历经多轮用户需求调研与全球复杂路况实测。其同源车型已在南非、泰国等海外市场上市,收获了扎实的海外口碑。带着全球市场的严苛验证归来,风云T7精准贴合中国家庭日常用车场景,一次性补齐颜值、续航、安全、智能、舒享、操控六大核心刚需,让普通家庭购车无需妥协,一台车就能适配通勤代步、亲子出行、近郊露营、长途自驾等全部生活场景。

续航是家用电车的核心底气,也是用户最关心的痛点。风云T7不搞高低配续航差异化,实现全系600km续航平权。全车标配65.05kWh犀牛电池,官方CLTC 续航600km,实际测试可达667km,真实续航优于账面数据,彻底告别日常里程焦虑。补能效率同样十分亮眼,22分钟即可完成30%-80%快充,一杯咖啡的时间,就能补足三百公里续航,完全满足日常通勤和短途出游。

电池耐用性和环境适应性也十分出色,循环寿命超2500次,整车可实现15年稳定使用无需换电池。无论是零下四十度的极寒天气,还是六十度的高温环境,电池性能都能稳定输出。配合主动进气格栅、低风阻车身设计与高效热管理系统,有效降低整车能耗,冬季续航损耗大幅减少,北方用户冬季用车也更安心。
对于家庭用户而言,行车安全永远是重中之重。风云T7把高阶安全配置做到了全系标配,没有任何缩水。车身采用高比例高强度钢与热成型钢材质,搭配九横五纵笼式车身结构、专属加强底盘架构,整车刚性拉满。全车搭载九枚安全气囊,包含大体积双腔远端气囊与超长侧气帘,搭配六秒长效保压技术,即便遇到翻滚、连续撞击等极端情况,也能最大程度保护车内人员安全。

专属犀牛电池配备多层全方位防护,防水、抗挤压、耐高温性能远超国标要求,经过盐雾、火烧、极限碰撞等多重严苛测试,同时搭载多场景自动解锁逃生功能,从车身结构到电池防护,全方位筑牢家庭出行安全屏障。
智能化体验上,风云T7兼顾实用性与趣味性。新车搭载行业主流的4nm高端车规芯片,算力充足、响应迅速,日常操作流畅不卡顿。超大高清防眩中控屏搭配灵犀智舱与豆包大模型,语音交互自然精准,能听懂日常模糊指令,操作简单易懂,老人小孩都能轻松上手。


针对家庭驻车场景,车辆内置小憩、宝宝、露营、哨兵等六种专属模式,一键即可切换车内场景氛围。全套高精度传感器组成智能驾驶辅助系统,支持全场景自动泊车、远程泊车、百米循迹倒车、高速领航辅助等实用功能,无论是日常市区代步,还是高速长途出行,都能有效减轻驾驶压力,让新手也能从容驾驭。
空间和舒适性,直接决定家庭出行的体验感。风云T7凭借合理的车身尺寸与超长轴距,实现了超高车内得房率。后排腿部空间宽敞,地板纯平,即便身高一米八以上的成年人乘坐,也不会感到局促。

整车座椅采用多层云感舒适材质,支持通风、加热功能,四季乘坐都舒适。座椅完全放倒后可形成超大纯平空间,变身移动大床,不管是午休小憩、户外露营休憩,还是临时存放大件物品,都能轻松满足,完美适配多样化家用场景。

不玩配置套路,不做梯度溢价。奇瑞风云T7以扎实品质践行长期主义造车理念,将家用用户最需要的六大核心实力集于一身,用均衡、全面、靠谱的产品表现,打破家用电车“取舍两难”的行业现状,为普通家庭带来一步到位、无需将就的纯电出行新选择。

On August 12, Chery Fengyun T7 officially launched pre-sales, with a pre-sale price ranging from 99,800 yuan to 139,800 yuan.
This launch event, themed "Slow Craft Builds a Good Car, Sorry for the Wait", was less about a product reveal and more about a statement — in the current EV racing track, Chery, a car company jokingly called an "honest engineering nerd", chose to use one vehicle to tell the market: some things cannot be rushed, some roads cannot be bypassed.

Let's look at a set of figures first. In the first half of 2026, Chinese car exports reached 5.096 million vehicles, a year-on-year increase of 65.3%, and the world automotive landscape is entering "China Time". Amidst this wave of going global, Chery led the pack with an export volume of 943,800 vehicles, a year-on-year increase of 71.5%, with a Chery vehicle leaving for overseas markets every 17 seconds on average. More noteworthy is that Chery has ranked first in exports of Chinese brand passenger cars for 23 consecutive years, with cumulative global users surpassing 20 million, and overseas users approaching 7 million. Products are sold to over 130 countries and regions. These figures form the underlying logic of Fengyun T7 — it is not a car built domestically first and then figured out how to sell abroad, but a product that was developed according to global standards from the very beginning, verified globally, and returned to the domestic market only after receiving real feedback from the overseas market.

This path of "Going Global First, Returning Home Later" is not common in the current automotive industry. Fengyun T7 is called Lepas L6 overseas. Pre-sales have already started in South Africa, Thailand launched on July 24, followed by Indonesia in August, European Union in September, Australia/New Zealand and the UK in October. To meet the regulatory standards, climate conditions, road characteristics, and usage habits of so many countries and regions simultaneously, the R&D cycle is inevitably long. The fact is indeed the same — 2 years of planning, 3 years of R&D. In today's industry rhythm of "one new car every 12 months", this cycle almost seems out of place.

But it is precisely this 5-year slowness that allows Fengyun T7 to differentiate itself in many dimensions. In terms of safety, it was developed according to the 2026 version E-NCAP 5-star safety standard. The 2026 version E-NCAP decomposes overall vehicle safety into four pillars: safe driving, collision avoidance, collision protection, and post-collision safety. If any item has a significant weak point, a 5-star rating cannot be achieved. Fengyun T7 anchored this standard from the R&D stage, and also achieved the highest level of functional safety ASILD and global data compliance. This is not simply "piling up parts", but placing safety standards upfront into the product definition stage.

In terms of environmental adaptability, Fengyun T7's full-domain adaptation interval covers -40°C to 55°C. This range means it must function normally in the extreme cold of Northern Europe, the scorching heat of the Middle East, the humidity of Southeast Asia, and the strong UV radiation of plateaus. To this end, it is equipped with a dual-source wide-temperature heat pump plus PTC system launched in its class first; in tropical high-humidity areas, the air conditioning filter was optimized specifically to prevent mold and odors; in the Middle East region, a 4.5L large-capacity washer fluid tank was equipped; battery front and rear beam protection was added for Brazilian gravel roads. These details seem insignificant when viewed individually, but together they reflect a mindset of "building cars for global users" — not making a car first and then figuring out how to adapt to the environment, but understanding the needs of different environments before starting to build the car.

The validation process illustrates the point even more. Fengyun T7 simultaneously invested 81 dedicated durability vehicles for road tests, with cumulative vehicle testing mileage exceeding 6 million kilometers, and specific durability field testing covering 1.45 million kilometers. It covers 100+ extreme road condition environments including the EU, Australia/New Zealand, Middle East, South Africa, Russia, Mexico, Brazil, etc. The global road type coverage rate reaches 95% — high speed bumps in Brazil, cobblestone roads in Mexico, high-curvature curves on German Autobahns, unpaved muddy roads in South Africa, all have been run. Behind this scale of real vehicle verification lies huge time costs and capital investment, but it solves an essential problem: the reliability, environmental adaptability, and long-term durability that EV users worry about most can only be answered after running them through real global road conditions.

At the product capability level, Fengyun T7's configuration approach also reflects an "uncompromising" stance. In terms of range, the entire series is standard-equipped with 65.05kWh Rhinoceros battery, CLTC range 600km, real-world test up to 667km, 30% to 80% fast charging takes only 22 minutes. Battery cycle life exceeds 2500 times, the whole vehicle requires no battery replacement for 15 years. In terms of safety, 80% high-strength steel body, 18.84% hot-formed steel, nine-transverse and five-longitudinal cage body, class-leading 9 airbags. In terms of intelligence, class-first 4nm process 8775 chip, 15.6-inch 2.5K anti-glare screen, Falcon 500 intelligent driving equipped with 22 high-precision sensors. In terms of space, vehicle dimensions 4570×1852×1694mm, wheelbase 2700mm, 84% floor space rate. These configurations, looking at each item individually, are not extraordinary, but standard equipment across the series without gradient grading is indeed rare in the current home EV market.

Another dimension often overlooked is design. Fengyun T7 was completed jointly by 8 global R&D design centers, top international designer teams, and over 5000 global users. The same-source model Lepas L6 previously appeared at Milan Design Week, receiving the evaluation that it was "very attractive and good-looking". Among the 6 Eastern Elegance paint colors, Blazing Orange uses the Tri-coat three-layer paint process unique to its class, and the entire body paint underwent plateau high-intensity UV and high-low temperature alternating extreme tests, anti-fading, anti-aging. This pursuit of "looking good for a long time" follows the same logic as the whole vehicle "working well for a long time".

Back to the theme of that launch event — "Slow Craft Builds a Good Car, Sorry for the Wait". In the current situation where quick-made cars frequently encounter quality skepticism, Fengyun T7's "slowness" instead became a scarce value proposition. Slow in R&D — 3-year cycle, global 1+7+N R&D system polishing; Slow in Design — co-created by over 5000 users, coordinated by over 100 designers; Slow in Standards — designed according to 2026 version E-NCAP, about to enter high-regulation European market; Slow in Validation — 1.45 million kilometers, five major extreme environments. Behind these "slownesses" is the car-building system accumulated by Chery in 23 years of export ranking first and 20 million global users supporting the bottom line.

Fengyun T7 might not be the most aggressive pure electric SUV in terms of parameters, but it uses a complete "Global R&D — Global Standards — Global Validation — Global Quality" closed loop to answer a simple question: how should a pure electric SUV truly worth long-term trust for the whole family be built. In the second half of the industry where "piling up parts" shifts to "comparing quality", this answer might carry more weight than any showing off skills.

In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X90 and Chery Tiggo Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X90's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
Chery Tiggo Cross's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 88,750 - 99,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH (RM 99,750), 2025 1.5T Standard (RM 88,750), etc.
From a price perspective, Chery Tiggo Cross's starting price is RM 18,050 cheaper than Proton X90. To be honest, in this price range, a difference of a few thousand is actually not significant; the key is to look at overall value for money and long-term maintenance costs.

Proton X90 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo Cross is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Proton X90's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Chery Tiggo Cross's 1.5L 4-cyl, offering more confidence in mid-range acceleration, especially when overtaking on highways. However, Chery Tiggo Cross's fuel consumption might be more favorable, and the difference in daily city commuting will not be too large.

Proton X90's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Chery Tiggo Cross's safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
In terms of safety features, both cars have achieved good ratings. However, there are some differences in functionality between Proton X90's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo Cross's Basic. If you value active safety, you can carefully compare the feature lists of both.

Proton X90 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo Cross warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.

Overall, Proton X90 and Chery Tiggo Cross are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your homework, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big deal; spending time on research will never go wrong.

Di pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli membandingkan Proton X90 dan Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV apabila memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kereta ini mempunyai harga dan kedudukan pasaran yang agak sama, hari ini kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Harga OTR Proton X90 di Malaysia ialah RM 106,800 - 122,800, terdapat 4 versi, termasuk 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV di Malaysia ialah RM 159,750 - 159,750, terdapat 2 versi, termasuk 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 130,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 145,000) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X90 memang lebih murah RM 52,950 berbanding Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV. Jika bajet anda terhad, versi permulaan Proton sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Tetapi perlu diingat, beberapa ribu ringgit yang murah itu mungkin ada pertukaran dalam kelengkapan, bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Penilaian keselamatan Proton X90 ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Penilaian keselamatan Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV ialah TBD, sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk Basic.
Dari segi peralatan keselamatan, kedua-dua kereta mendapat penilaian yang baik. Walau bagaimanapun, terdapat perbezaan fungsi antara ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) pada Proton X90 dan Basic pada Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV. Jika anda mengutamakan keselamatan aktif, anda boleh membandingkan senarai fungsi kedua-duanya dengan teliti.
Proton X90 menggunakan kaedah pemanduan FWD.
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV menggunakan kaedah pemanduan FWD.
Kaedah pemanduan kedua-dua kereta adalah sama, iaitu FWD, pengalaman memandu harian tidak akan berbeza jauh.
Proton X90 menjamin 5 tahun/150,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV menjamin 3 tahun/100,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Secara keseluruhan, Proton X90 dan Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV adalah model kereta yang cukup bagus di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih mana satu, utamanya bergantung pada keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Kami sarankan anda melakukan kajian, bandingkan beberapa kutipan harga dari kedai kereta, kemudian buat ujian pemanduan untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara penting, menghabiskan masa untuk membuat kajian tidak akan salah.

August 10, 2026, BYD Japan's official website updated a set of data: the pure electric K-Car "Racco" (RACCO) developed exclusively for the Japanese market, from its launch on July 28 to August 9, cumulative orders reached 1,002 units in two weeks, completing the initial target ahead of schedule. This volume, if placed in the domestic new energy vehicle market, is merely the achievement of some hit models in a week; but in Japan—this "world's most closed automobile market" where foreign brands have failed to truly pry open for over 30 years—it means a door quietly pushed open.

More importantly, the order structure: approximately 80% of orders concentrated on the top-spec 300 Premium with the highest requirements for range and configuration, while the Racco received a national subsidy of only 150,000 Yen, far lower than Nissan Sakura's 580,000 and Toyota bZ4X's 1.3 million. In other words, these 1,002 Japanese users were not attracted by low prices, but were willing to pay extra from their own pockets for the top spec. Achieving over 1,000 orders with the least subsidy is a matter that itself deserves closer examination.
1,002 Orders, Why Does It Carry Weight in Japan?
To assess the weight of 1,002 units, one must first clarify its position in BYD's Japan coordinate system.
BYD entered the Japanese passenger car market in July 2022, moving not very fast over three years: 1,446 units in 2023, 2,223 units in 2024 (YoY +54%, pure electric sales surpassed Toyota for the first time), 3,742 units in 2025 (YoY +68%). Cumulative total approximately 7,400 units by end of 2025. And the 1,002 units Racco secured in two weeks is basically equivalent to one-seventh of BYD's cumulative sales in Japan over the past three years, also close to half of its Japan sales of 2,334 units in the first half of 2026.

Put into the K-Car niche, the significance is even different. In 2025, total retail in the Japanese K-Car market was 1.667 million units, accounting for 36.5% of total new car sales, with Suzuki, Daihatsu, and Honda combined taking up 80% share. Honda N-BOX cumulative sales exceeded 3 million units after over a decade on the market, the market's evergreen tree. For over 30 years, except for Japanese local brands, no foreign brand has ever launched a dedicated K-Car model for it; BYD is the first.
The Racco is not simply importing a small car with a right-hand drive conversion, but developed forward in strict accordance with Japanese K-Car regulations: vehicle dimensions 3395×1475×1800mm, precisely fitting within the upper limit of light vehicles with length ≤3.4 meters, width ≤1.48 meters, and height ≤2.0 meters; right-hand drive, four seats, column gear shift, boxy cube design, electric sliding doors standard across the board; equipped with e-Platform 3.0 pure electric platform and Lithium Iron Phosphate Blade Battery, providing 22.4kWh and 35.84kWh two capacities, top-spec WLTC range 320 kilometers, the first Japanese light pure electric vehicle to break 300 kilometers, and supports 50kW fast charging, V2L and V2H external discharge. What is the concept of a 320 km range? Nissan's pure electric K-Car Sakura has a range of about 180 kilometers, the Racco top-spec can run about 140 kilometers more on a single charge compared to it. In Japan, where charging piles are scarce, every 100 kilometers of range is a real competitive edge.
Japanese Automobile Market: Cracks in the Closed Market are Widening
To understand why the Racco can succeed, one must first understand how "special" the Japanese automobile market is.

2025 Japanese new car sales 4.42 million, 95% of which were local brands. Pure electric vehicle annual sales 60,677 units, electrification rate only 1.6%, bottom-ranked among major developed economies. As of March 2025, Japan's national public charging piles only built 68,000, while government plans to increase to 300,000 by 2030—compare with Shenzhen city which exceeded 410,000 charging piles in the same period.
Deeper contradictions lie within the local automakers themselves. Toyota 2025 global sales 11.3 million, consecutive sixth year global first, but its pure electric model share only 1.9%, Japan domestic pure electric delivery only 4,227 units; Honda launched its first pure electric car Honda e in 2020, but sold for only over 3 years and stopped production in January 2024 due to sluggish sales, and cut the 2030 fiscal year electrification R&D budget from 10 trillion Yen to 7 trillion Yen. Japanese automakers invested decades in hybrid routes, pure electric field is jokingly called "mistakenly chose the wrong tech tree" by the industry.
But cracks are appearing. 2025 Japan non-local brand imported car sales YoY climb 7% to 243,000 units, among which pure electric imported car sales YoY surge 26%, reaching historical peak of 30,513 units, occupying half of Japan domestic EV sales. Q4 2025, Toyota new bZ4X topped Japan EV sales chart for first time with 3,684 units, Honda N-ONE e: Qtr sales 2,732 units, YoY growth 194 times—local giants finally start fighting this pure electric battle seriously.
Subsidy policies also stepped up in 2026: Japanese government raised EV purchase subsidy cap from 900,000 Yen to 1.3 million Yen. Although Racco had the least national subsidy among three benchmark cars (only 150,000 Yen), post-subsidy terminal price starts around 1.995 million Yen, superimposed with K-Car own enjoy tax exemption, no parking space certificate needed, insurance discounts, etc. policies, purchase threshold squeezed to an interval close to fuel K-Car.
BYD's Japanese Strategy: From Selling Cars to Rooting Locally
Racco's success is not an isolated event, but an iteration of the strategy BYD developed in Japan over three years.

The first step was channel decentralization. BYD opened its first store in Tokyo in January 2023, planned to expand to 100 by end of 2025. As of September 2025, already built 70 sales service outlets, covering 38 prefectures and cities, store count is 2 times Tesla's Japan network. July 13, 2026, Japan top luxury car import dealer YANASE announced formal introduction of BYD, this is Japan mainstream import car merchants' first time bringing a Chinese brand into the sales system.
The second step is product matrix "passenger and commercial simultaneous advancement". Passenger car end from ATTO 3, Dolphin, Seal to Sealion 07 EV, December 2025 again launched first plug-in hybrid model SEALION 6 (Sealion 6), as of April 2026 orders already exceeded 900 units, accounting for 50% of BYD Japan orders that year. Commercial vehicle end, BYD in Japan global premiere pure electric truck T35 and J6 living car concept bus, plus already operated J7, K8 bus, form complete matrix.
The third step is technical adaptation rather than technical output. The most interesting detail of the Racco is BYD specially adjusted kinetic energy recovery system to simulate fuel car driving feel, and retained more physical buttons inside car—this is respect for Japanese middle-aged and elderly K-Car user habits. V2H external discharge function then accurately hit Japan many typhoons, many earthquakes disaster emergency needs. This is not copying China market tech specs directly to Japan, but using BYD's three-electric underlying capability to adapt to Japan society's real usage scenarios.
BYD Japan Company President Tofukuji Atsushi revealed, Racco before launch every two test drivers one person buys car, conversion rate as high as 50%, far exceeding industry average. This shows the "China Made = Cheap Low Quality" stereotype is being dismantled by product strength itself—blind logo tests showed 70% of consumers would choose BYD, but when logo shown this ratio dropped to 35%, brand cognition gap indeed exists, but product experience is quickly filling this gap.
Looking at BYD's International Layout Logic from the Japanese Campaign
Putting vision to global, Racco's strategy in Japan is not a lone example, but a model of BYD internationalization entering "Localization 2.0 Stage".

In Southeast Asia, BYD used Thailand as a fulcrum, utilizing old Honda factories reformed as EV assembly bases to radiate the ASEAN market. In Japan, it is another idea: no longer satisfied exporting existing models, but doing forward development based on local regulations, usage habits, and social needs. K-Car is a unique light vehicle standard in Japan; no foreign brand has ever tried to develop a dedicated model for this standard—BYD did, and did it right.
This "Localization Forward Development" capability comes from the underlying BYD vertical integration system: Blade Battery, e-Platform 3.0 pure electric platform, motor and electronic control self-research, allowing it to customize products for special needs of a single market with lower marginal costs, without being limited by global model compromises like traditional joint venture brands.
The Racco set a 2026 goal for BYD: to secure 10,000 units in orders. If this number is realized, it will be equivalent to 1.3 times its cumulative sales in Japan over the past three years. More importantly, it verified a path: using electrification + local development to cut into market segments foreign brands have never entered. If this path is proven replicable, then Europe's small car market, Southeast Asia's cheap car market, and Latin America's utility car market could all become the next "Racco battlefield".
Cold Thinking: Real Problems Behind Thousand Orders
Of course, we cannot only see high gallop. Behind the Racco's 1,002 orders, there are still several real problems that need facing.

First, absolute scale is still very small. The 10,000 unit annual goal put into Japan K-Car market's 1.667 million total pie, penetration rate is less than 0.1%. Suzuki Spacia one car monthly sales about 15,000 units, Racco's two weeks 1,002 unit orders is equivalent to one-third of Suzuki Spacia's monthly sales. The symbolic meaning of prising open the market pattern is far greater than market share meaning.
Second, subsidy disadvantage is a long-term challenge. Racco's national subsidy is only 150,000 Yen, while competitors can get up to 1.3 million. This policy tilt will not change in the short term, meaning BYD must continuously widen the gap in product strength to offset the disadvantage in subsidies.
Third, local automakers' counterattack has begun. Toyota bZ4X upgraded version orders broke 10,000 within three months of launch; Honda N-ONE e: with 295 km range became the range benchmark for electric micro cars; Nissan 3rd Gen Leaf range up to 702 km; Suzuki e Vitara starting price 3.99 million Yen, actual cost slightly higher than 2.7 million Yen after deducting subsidy. 2026 Japan EV market will be a year for local brands to exert collective strength.
Summary

Looking back, the true value of Racco breaking 1,000 in two weeks is not on the number 1,002 itself, but on it proving "Electrification + Localization Forward Development" is a feasible path to break Japan market closure. For over 30 years, European and American automakers tried, Hyundai tried (entered 2001, exited 2009), none could truly step into this K-Car moat. According to media reports: BYD used a specially developed box car to make Japanese automakers believe "BYD is a huge threat".
Orders converting to real registration volume, converting to user reputation, converting to repurchase and recommendation is the second stage of this battle. Racco opened the door, but whether it can truly walk into Japanese families' garages depends on BYD's delivery and service in the next 12 months. For the global automotive industry, the fissure prised open by this "hard bone" Japan might just be the turning point for Chinese car companies from "Product Going Out" to "Localization Car Making".

Dalam pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli membandingkan Proton X90 dan Chery Tiggo 8 semasa memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kereta ini sangat hampir dari segi harga dan kedudukan, hari ini kita akan melakukan perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Harga OTR Proton X90 di Malaysia ialah RM 106,800 - 122,800, terdapat 4 varian, termasuk 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Chery Tiggo 8 di Malaysia ialah RM 129,750 - 129,750, terdapat 1 varian, termasuk 2026 1.6T Standard (RM 129,750) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X90 memang lebih murah RM 22,950 berbanding Chery Tiggo 8. Jika bajet anda terhad, versi pengenalan Proton sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Tetapi perhatikan, beberapa ribu yang murah itu, mungkin ada kompromi dalam kelengkapan, lihat keperluan anda secara spesifik.

Proton X90 dilengkapi enjin 1.5L Turbo, kuasa 140 hp. Jimat minyak rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 8 dilengkapi enjin 1.5L Turbo, kuasa 140 hp. Jimat minyak rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Kedua-dua kereta menggunakan sistem penggerak yang sama, rasa memandu sehari-hari hampir tiada perbezaan. Jimat minyak juga hampir sama, tidak perlu terlalu bimbang tentang hal ini.

Panjang badan Proton X90 4400 mm, bak muatan 400 L.
Panjang badan Chery Tiggo 8 4400 mm, bak muatan 400 L.
Saiz kedua-dua kereta hampir sama, ruang dalaman hampir tiada beza. Kereta dalam kelas ini, penggunaan sehari-hari cukup.

Proton X90 menggunakan cara penggerak FWD.
Chery Tiggo 8 menggunakan cara penggerak FWD.
Cara penggerak kedua-dua kereta sama, iaitu FWD, rasa memandu sehari-hari tiada beza besar.

Secara keseluruhan, Proton X90 dan Chery Tiggo 8 adalah model kereta yang sangat bagus di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana, kunci tetap lihat keperluan peribadi dan bajet anda. Disarankan untuk membuat kajian, bandingkan harga beberapa dealer, kemudian uji memandu buat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa membuat kajian pasti tidak salah.

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X90 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近,今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比,幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800,一共有 4 個版本,包括 2026 1.5T Prime X(RM 122,800)、2026 1.5T Prime(RM 116,800)、2026 1.5T Lite(RM 106,800) 等。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750,一共有 2 個版本,包括 1.6L Turbo Standard(RM 130,000)、1.6L Turbo Premium(RM 145,000) 等。
從價錢睇嚟,Proton X90 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 平咗 RM 52,950。如果你預算有限,Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要小心,平嗰幾千蚊,可能喺配備上有取舍,具體要看你嘅需求。

Proton X90 車身長 4400 mm,後備箱 400 L。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 車身長 4400 mm,後備箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣,車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車,日常使用完全夠用。

Proton X90 保養保修 5 年/150,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 保養保修 3 年/100,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

Proton X90 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇,適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價,可以優先考慮口碑好嗰款;如果你更在意性價比同配備,那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都好建議兩款都去試駕,親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講,Proton X90 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛,關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行之報價,再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X90 and Mazda CX-60 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X90 is priced at RM 106,800 - 122,800 OTR in Malaysia, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
Mazda CX-60 is priced at RM 200,510 - 252,873 OTR in Malaysia, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus (RM 252,873), 2025 2.5L 2WD High (RM 200,510), etc.
From a price perspective, Proton X90's starting price is indeed RM 93,710 cheaper than Mazda CX-60. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the cheaper price might involve trade-offs in features, it specifically depends on your requirements.

Proton X90 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-60 is equipped with 2.0L 4-cyl, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Mazda CX-60's 2.0L 4-cyl has 30 more horsepower than Proton X90's 1.5L Turbo. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel underpowered.

Proton X90 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mazda CX-60 body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, Mazda CX-60's body is 100 mm longer than Proton X90, offering more advantage in passenger space. However, Proton X90 is a bit more flexible for parking in the city, each has trade-offs.

Proton X90 adopts FWD drive type.
Mazda CX-60 adopts FWD drive type.
Both cars have the same drive type, both FWD, daily driving experience will not have much difference.

In general, Proton X90 and Mazda CX-60 are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, compare quotes from several dealers, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, taking the time to do your research will definitely not be a mistake.

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會用 Proton X90 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 做比較。這兩款車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近,而家我哋就從多個角度做個詳細嘅比較,幫到你省返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800,合共有 4 個版本,包括 2026 1.5T Prime X(RM 122,800)、2026 1.5T Prime(RM 116,800)、2026 1.5T Lite(RM 106,800) 等。
Chery Tiggo Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 88,750 - 99,750,合共有 2 個版本,包括 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH(RM 99,750)、2025 1.5T Standard(RM 88,750) 等。
睇返價錢,Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅起步價比 Proton X90 平咗 RM 18,050。講真,喺呢個價位段,幾千蚊嘅分別其實唔算大,關鍵都係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。

Proton X90 配備 1.5L Turbo,馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo Cross 配備 1.5L 4-cyl,馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
動力方面,Proton X90 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力,中段加速更有把握,尤其係行高速公路超車嗰陣。不過 Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅油耗可能更抵用,日常市區通勤分別唔會太大。

Proton X90 車身長 4400 mm,尾箱 400 L。
Chery Tiggo Cross 車身長 4400 mm,尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾近一樣,車內空間分別唔大。呢個級距嘅車,日常使用完全夠用。

Proton X90 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣,都係 FWD,日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。

總括嚟講,Proton X90 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 都係馬來西亞市場唔錯嘅車型。揀邊架,關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足做功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再去試駕先做最後決定。買車係件大事,花啲時間做功課絕對無錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 寶騰 X90 同 奇瑞 瑞虎 Cross 來做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近,今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較,幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800,一共有 4 個版本,包括 2026 1.5T Prime X(RM 122,800)、2026 1.5T Prime(RM 116,800)、2026 1.5T Lite(RM 106,800) 等。
奇瑞 瑞虎 Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 88,750 - 99,750,一共有 2 個版本,包括 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH(RM 99,750)、2025 1.5T Standard(RM 88,750) 等。
從價錢來看,奇瑞 瑞虎 Cross 嘅起步價比 寶騰 X90 平咗 RM 18,050。老實講,喺呢個價位段,幾千塊嘅差距其實唔算大,關鍵始終係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。

寶騰 X90 車身長 4400 mm,後備箱 400 L。
奇瑞 瑞虎 Cross 車身長 4400 mm,後備箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣,車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車,日常使用完全夠用。

寶騰 X90 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
奇瑞 瑞虎 Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣,都係 FWD,日常駕駛感受唔會出現太大分別。

寶騰 X90 同 奇瑞 瑞虎 Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇,適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價,可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款;如果你更在意性價比同配備,嗰就揀配備更豐富嗰款。始終係建議兩款都去試駕,親身體驗先至最重要。

總體嚟講,寶騰 X90 同 奇瑞 瑞虎 Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛,關鍵始終係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-8 做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近,今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較,幫你省下做足功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800,一共有 4 個版本,包括 2026 1.5T Prime X(RM 122,800)、2026 1.5T Prime(RM 116,800)、2026 1.5T Lite(RM 106,800)等。
Mazda CX-8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 165,360 - 201,360,一共有 5 個版本,包括 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol(RM 201,360)、2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel(RM 193,123)、2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol(RM 186,360)等。
從價錢嚟睇,Proton X90 嘅起步價確實比 Mazda CX-8 平咗 RM 58,560。如果你預算有限,Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但要留意,平嗰幾千蚊,可能喺配備上會要做取舍,具體要看你嘅需要。

Proton X90 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Mazda CX-8 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 Brand ADAS。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣,喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算給好齊。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差,唔使太擔心這一點。

Proton X90 車身長 4400 mm,後行李廂 400 L。
Mazda CX-8 車身長 4500 mm,後行李廂 450 L。
空間方面,Mazda CX-8 嘅車身比 Proton X90 長咗 100 mm,乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Proton X90 喺市區泊車會靈活啲,各有取舍。

Proton X90 保修 5 年/150,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-8 保修 5 年/150,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保養條件一樣,呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要看品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格,建議去車友群問下真實車主嘅經驗。

Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-8 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇,適合家用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價,可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款;如果你更在乎性價比同配備,就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕,親身體驗先係最重要。

總嚟講,Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-8 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛,關鍵仲係要看你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做足功課,多比幾間車行嘅報價,再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好買家在揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-5 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近,今日我就從多個方面做一次詳細嘅比較,幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800,一共有 4 個版本,包括 2026 1.5T Prime X(RM 122,800)、2026 1.5T Prime(RM 116,800)、2026 1.5T Lite(RM 106,800)等等。
Mazda CX-5 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 135,469 - 166,760,一共有 3 個版本,包括 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary(RM 316,154)、2025 2.0L AT(RM 296,154)、2025 2.0L MT(RM 294,154)等等。
從價錢嚟睇,Proton X90 嘅起步價確實比 Mazda CX-5 平咗 RM 28,669。如果你預算有限,Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意,平嗰幾千蚊,可能喺配備上會有取舍,具體要睇你嘅需求。

Proton X90 搭載 1.5L Turbo,馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Mazda CX-5 搭載 1.5L Turbo,馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩款車用緊同一套動力系統,日常開起來嘅感受基本冇乜差別。油耗方面都差唔多,唔使太糾結這一點。

Proton X90 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Mazda CX-5 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣,喺呢個級別裡面安全配備都算畀得好齊全。而家嘅新车安全性都唔差,唔使太擔心這一點。

Proton X90 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mazda CX-5 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣,都係 FWD,日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。

Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-5 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇,適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌同口碑同二手價,可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款;如果你更在意性價比同配備,那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕,親身體驗先最重要。

總體嚟講,Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-5 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛,關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X90 and Mazda CX-30 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
The OTR price of the Proton X90 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
The OTR price of the Mazda CX-30 in Malaysia is RM 122,409 - 146,409, with a total of 4 versions, including 2025 2.0L High+ Premium (RM 146,409), 2025 2.0L High+ (RM 138,409), 2025 2.0L High (RM 130,409), etc.
From the price perspective, the starting price of the Proton X90 is indeed RM 15,609 cheaper than the Mazda CX-30. If your budget is limited, the Proton entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the lower price may involve trade-offs in equipment, it depends on your specific needs.

The Proton X90 adopts FWD drive mode.
The Mazda CX-30 adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, which is FWD, so there won't be a big difference in daily driving experience.

Proton X90 Warranty 5 years / 150,000km, Maintenance Interval Every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-30 Warranty 5 years / 150,000km, Maintenance Interval Every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, no need to worry about this aspect. Actual maintenance costs also depend on the brand's service network and parts prices, it is recommended to ask real owners in car owner groups for experience.

The Proton X90 and Mazda CX-30 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and equipment, choose the one with richer configuration. Finally, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.

Overall, the Proton X90 and Mazda CX-30 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do research, compare quotes from multiple car dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will never be wrong.

In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X90 and Mazda CX-3 when selecting a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X90's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
The Mazda CX-3's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 126,159 - 139,159, with a total of 2 versions, including 2023 2.0L High (RM 139,159), 2023 2.0L Plus (RM 126,159), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of the Proton X90 is indeed RM 19,359 cheaper than the Mazda CX-3. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the cheaper few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your needs.

The Proton X90 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, with 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
The Mazda CX-3 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, with 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same power system, the driving feel is basically the same in daily use. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this point.

The Proton X90's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The Mazda CX-3's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include i-Activsense.
The safety ratings of both cars are the same. For this level, the safety features are considered quite complete. New cars nowadays do not have poor safety, no need to worry too much about this point.

The Proton X90 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The Mazda CX-3 body length is 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, the Mazda CX-3's body is 100 mm longer than the Proton X90, offering an advantage in passenger space. However, the Proton X90 is a bit more flexible for parking in the city, each has its trade-offs.

The Proton X90 and Mazda CX-3 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configurations. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both models, personal experience is the most important.

Overall, the Proton X90 and Mazda CX-3 are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose, the key depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest you do your homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, then go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not be wrong.

Di pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli membandingkan Proton X90 dan Mazda CX-30 apabila memilih kereta.
Harga OTR Proton X90 di Malaysia ialah RM 106,800 - 122,800, terdapat 4 varian, termasuk 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Mazda CX-30 di Malaysia ialah RM 122,409 - 146,409, terdapat 4 varian, termasuk 2025 2.0L High+ Premium (RM 146,409), 2025 2.0L High+ (RM 138,409), 2025 2.0L High (RM 130,409) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X90 memang RM 15,609 lebih murah daripada Mazda CX-30. Jika bajet anda terhad, varian asas Proton sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Tetapi perlu diingat, perbezaan harga beribu-ribu ringgit itu mungkin ada pertukaran dari segi peralatan, ia bergantung pada keperluan anda.

Pengkelasan keselamatan Proton X90 ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Pengkelasan keselamatan Mazda CX-30 ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk i-Activsense.
Pengkelasan keselamatan kedua-dua kereta adalah sama, pengelengkapan keselamatan dalam kategori ini sudah cukup lengkap. Keselamatan kereta baharu sekarang tidak buruk, anda tidak perlu terlalu bimbang tentang hal ini.

Panjang badan Proton X90 4400 mm, tempat bagasi 400 L.
Panjang badan Mazda CX-30 4500 mm, tempat bagasi 450 L.
Dari segi ruang, badan Mazda CX-30 100 mm lebih panjang daripada Proton X90, ruang penumpang lebih unggul. Namun, Proton X90 lebih fleksibel untuk diparkir di bandar, masing-masing ada pertukaran sendiri.

Proton X90 dan Mazda CX-30 adalah pilihan utama di pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga dan perjalanan harian. Jika anda lebih mengutamakan reputasi jenama dan harga jual semula, pertimbangkan model yang lebih baik reputasinya; jika anda lebih mengutamakan nilai dan peralatan, pilih model dengan konfigurasi lebih lengkap. Akhir sekali, disyorkan untuk uji memandu kedua-dua model, pengalaman langsung adalah yang paling penting.

Secara keseluruhannya, Proton X90 dan Mazda CX-30 adalah model yang sangat bagus di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih salah satu daripada mereka, kuncinya adalah melihat keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Kami cadangkan anda membuat penyelidikan, bandingkan sebutan harga dari beberapa dealer, kemudian uji memandu untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa untuk membuat penyelidikan tidak akan salah.

Dalam pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli membandingkan Proton X90 dan Mazda CX-3 semasa memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kereta ini sangat rapat dari segi harga dan segmentasi. Hari ini kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Harga OTR Proton X90 di Malaysia adalah RM 106,800 - 122,800, terdapat 4 versi keseluruhan, termasuk 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Mazda CX-3 di Malaysia adalah RM 126,159 - 139,159, terdapat 2 versi keseluruhan, termasuk 2023 2.0L High (RM 139,159), 2023 2.0L Plus (RM 126,159) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X90 memang RM 19,359 lebih murah berbanding Mazda CX-3. Jika bajet anda terhad, versi permulaan Proton sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Namun perlu diingat, jumlah berbeza beberapa ribu ringgit itu, mungkin ada kompromi dari segi kelengkapan, ia bergantung pada keperluan anda.

Proton X90 dilengkapi enjin 1.5L Turbo, kuasa 140 hp. Penggunaan bahan api rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-3 dilengkapi enjin 1.5L Turbo, kuasa 140 hp. Penggunaan bahan api rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Kedua-dua kereta menggunakan sistem kuasa yang sama, rasa pemanduan harian pada dasarnya tiada perbezaan. Dari segi penggunaan bahan api juga hampir sama, tidak perlu terlalu memikirkan hal ini.

Peringkat keselamatan Proton X90 ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Peringkat keselamatan Mazda CX-3 ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk i-Activsense.
Peringkat keselamatan kedua-dua kereta adalah sama, dalam kelas ini kelengkapan keselamatan dianggap lengkap. Keselamatan kereta baru sekarang tidak buruk, tidak perlu terlalu bimbang mengenai hal ini.

Proton X90 menggunakan sistem pemacu FWD.
Mazda CX-3 menggunakan sistem pemacu FWD.
Sistem pemacu kedua-dua kereta adalah sama, kedua-duanya FWD, rasa pemanduan harian tidak akan berbeza banyak.

Secara keseluruhan, Proton X90 dan Mazda CX-3 kedua-duanya adalah model yang sangat bagus di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana, kunci utamanya adalah melihat keperluan peribadi dan bajet anda. Kami sarankan anda membuat kajian, membandingkan beberapa tawaran dari pengedar kereta, kemudian pergi ujian memandu untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa membuat kajian tidak akan salah.

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-3 來做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近,而家我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較,幫你省做足功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800,一共有 4 個版本,包括 2026 1.5T Prime X(RM 122,800)、2026 1.5T Prime(RM 116,800)、2026 1.5T Lite(RM 106,800) 等。
Mazda CX-3 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 126,159 - 139,159,一共有 2 個版本,包括 2023 2.0L High(RM 139,159)、2023 2.0L Plus(RM 126,159) 等。
從價錢來看,Proton X90 嘅起價確實比 Mazda CX-3 平咗 RM 19,359。如果你預算有限,Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意,平嗰幾千蚊,可能喺配備上會有取舍,具體要看你嘅需求。

Proton X90 採 FWD 驅動方式。
Mazda CX-3 採 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣,都係 FWD,日常駕駛感受唔會有大分別。

Proton X90 保養保修 5 年/150,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-3 保養保修 5 年/150,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣,呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要看品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價錢,建議去車友群問下真實車主嘅經驗。

Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-3 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇,適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價,可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款;如果你更在意性價比同配備,就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終仲係建議兩款都去試駕,親身體驗先係最重要嘅。

總括嚟講,Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-3 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛,關鍵仲係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿寶騰 X90 同豐田卡羅拉 Cross 嚟做比較。这两款车喺價位同定位上都幾接近,今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較,幫妳省下做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800,一共有 4 個版本,包括 2026 1.5T Prime X(RM 122,800)、2026 1.5T Prime(RM 116,800)、2026 1.5T Lite(RM 106,800) 等。
豐田卡羅拉 Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 133,800 - 148,800,一共有 3 個版本,包括 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport(RM 148,800)、2026 HEV 1.8L Standard(RM 140,800)、2026 1.8L Standard(RM 133,800) 等。
從價錢嚟睇,寶騰 X90 嘅起步價確實比豐田卡羅拉 Cross 平咗 RM 27,000。如果你預算有限,寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意,平嗰幾千蚊,可能喺配備上會有取捨,具體要看你嘅需要。

寶騰 X90 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
豐田卡羅拉 Cross 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 TSS (PCS, LDA, ACC, LTA)。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣,喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算畀得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都不錯,唔使太擔心這一點。

寶騰 X90 車身長 4400 mm,尾箱 400 L。
豐田卡羅拉 Cross 車身長 4400 mm,尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣,車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車,日常使用完全夠用。

寶騰 X90 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
豐田卡羅拉 Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣,都係 FWD,日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。

總括嚟講,寶騰 X90 同豐田卡羅拉 Cross 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛,關鍵都係要看你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較間車行嘅報價,先去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事,花少少時間做功課絕對唔錯。
