Homestories
Search History
Popular Searches
Dealer Login / Sign Up
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會用 Honda CR-V 同 MG MG HS 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Honda CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 178,200 - 195,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS（RM 195,900）、2026 1.5T 4WD V（RM 181,900）、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E（RM 178,200） 等。
MG MG HS 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 130,450 - 146,450，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 105,000）、1.5L Executive（RM 115,000） 等。
從價錢睇落嚟，MG MG HS 嘅起步價比 Honda CR-V 平咗 RM 47,750。講真嘅，喺呢個價位段，幾千塊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Honda CR-V 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
MG MG HS 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Honda CR-V 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 MG MG HS 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力，中段加速更有信心，尤其係喺跑高速公路超車嘅時候。不過 MG MG HS 嘅油耗可能更友善，日常市區通勤差別唔會太大。
Honda CR-V 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。
MG MG HS 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Honda CR-V 嘅 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM) 同 MG MG HS 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比一下兩者嘅功能列表。
Honda CR-V 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
MG MG HS 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。
總體嚟講，Honda CR-V 同 MG MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Honda CR-V 同 MG MG HS 來做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Honda CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 178,200 - 195,900，一總共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS（RM 195,900）、2026 1.5T 4WD V（RM 181,900）、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E（RM 178,200） 等。
MG MG HS 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 130,450 - 146,450，一總共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 105,000）、1.5L Executive（RM 115,000） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，MG MG HS 嘅起步價比 Honda CR-V 平咗 RM 47,750。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千塊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Honda CR-V 配備 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
MG MG HS 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Honda CR-V 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 MG MG HS 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力，中段加速更有信心，尤其係跑高速公路超車嘅時候。不過 MG MG HS 嘅油耗可能更抵用，日常市區通勤差別唔會太大。
Honda CR-V 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。
MG MG HS 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Honda CR-V 嘅 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM) 同 MG MG HS 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有少少差異，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
Honda CR-V 保養 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
MG MG HS 保養 7 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Honda CR-V 同 MG MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事情，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare the Honda CR-V and MG MG HS when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Honda CR-V's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 178,200 - 195,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200), etc.
The MG MG HS's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 130,450 - 146,450, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L Standard (RM 105,000), 1.5L Executive (RM 115,000), etc.
From the price perspective, the starting price of the MG MG HS is RM 47,750 cheaper than the Honda CR-V. Honestly, at this price segment, a gap of a few thousand is not actually that big. The key is to look at the overall cost-performance ratio and long-term usage costs.
The Honda CR-V adopts the FWD drive mode.
The MG MG HS adopts the FWD drive mode.
The drive mode of both cars is the same, both are FWD, so there won't be much difference in daily driving feel.
The Honda CR-V has a warranty of 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
The MG MG HS has a warranty of 7 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
The Honda CR-V and MG MG HS are both mainstream choices in the Malaysia market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation. If you care more about cost-performance ratio and equipment, then choose the model with more configurations. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
In general, the Honda CR-V and MG MG HS are both very good car models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several car dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Honda CR-V and MG MG HS when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Honda CR-V in Malaysia is RM 178,200 - 195,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200) etc.
The OTR price of MG MG HS in Malaysia is RM 130,450 - 146,450, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L Standard (RM 105,000), 1.5L Executive (RM 115,000) etc.
Looking at the price, MG MG HS is RM 47,750 cheaper at the starting price than Honda CR-V. Honestly, in this price range, a difference of a few thousand is not that big. The key is to look at the overall value for money and long-term usage cost.
Honda CR-V body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
MG MG HS body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
In terms of space, the Honda CR-V body is 100 mm longer than MG MG HS, and the interior passenger space will be slightly more spacious, especially the rear legroom. If you often carry family members or need to put a stroller, a slightly larger body is indeed more practical.
Honda CR-V warranty 5 years / unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.
MG MG HS warranty 7 years / 150,000 km, maintenance interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.
Honda CR-V and MG MG HS are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation. If you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer specifications. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Honda CR-V and MG MG HS are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from multiple car dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big thing, spending some time on research will definitely not be wrong.
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare Honda CR-V and MG MG HS when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on homework.
Honda CR-V has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 178,200 - 195,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200), etc.
MG MG HS has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 130,450 - 146,450, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L Standard (RM 105,000), 1.5L Executive (RM 115,000), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of MG MG HS is RM 47,750 cheaper than Honda CR-V. Honestly, in this price range, a difference of a few thousand is not really significant; the key is to look at overall cost-performance ratio and long-term usage costs.
Honda CR-V is equipped with a 2.0L 4-cyl, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
MG MG HS is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Honda CR-V's 2.0L 4-cyl has 30 more horsepower than MG MG HS's 1.5L Turbo, providing more confidence in mid-range acceleration, especially when overtaking on highways. However, MG MG HS's fuel consumption might be more friendly; the difference for daily city commuting will not be too large.
Honda CR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
MG MG HS warranty 7 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda CR-V and MG MG HS are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Honda CR-V and MG MG HS are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test drive before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers often compare the Honda CR-V and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV when choosing a car.
The Honda CR-V's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 178,200 - 195,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200), etc.
The Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 129,750 - 129,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 2025 1.5T 90km CSH (RM 129,750), What charging methods does the Tiggo 7 PHEV support? Can it be charged using a home power socket? (RM 117,478), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of the Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV is RM 48,450 cheaper than the Honda CR-V. Honestly, in this price range, a difference of a few thousand is not significant; the key lies in the overall cost-performance ratio and long-term usage costs.
The safety rating of the Honda CR-V is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), and the active safety system includes Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
The safety rating of the Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV is TBD, and the active safety system includes Basic.
In terms of safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, there are some differences in functionality between the Honda CR-V's Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM) and the Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV's Basic. If you value active safety, you can compare the feature lists of both carefully.
The Honda CR-V body length is 4500 mm, and the trunk is 450 L.
The Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV body length is 4400 mm, and the trunk is 400 L.
In terms of space, the Honda CR-V's body is 100 mm longer than the Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV, providing slightly more passenger space inside, especially legroom in the back seat. If you often carry family members or need to fit a stroller, a slightly larger body is indeed more practical.
Both the Honda CR-V and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is suggested to test drive both models; experiencing it personally is the most important.
Overall, both the Honda CR-V and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter; spending some time doing homework will definitely not be a mistake.
Dalam pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli membandingkan Honda CR-V dan Chery Tiggo 9 apabila memilih kereta.
Harga OTR Honda CR-V di Malaysia ialah RM 178,200 - 195,900, terdapat 4 varian, termasuk 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Chery Tiggo 9 di Malaysia ialah RM 166,800 - 179,800, terdapat 1 varian, termasuk 2026 2.0T Standard (RM 179,750) dan lain-lain.
Daripada segi harga, harga permulaan Chery Tiggo 9 lebih murah RM 11,400 berbanding Honda CR-V. Jujurnya, dalam julat harga ini, perbezaan beberapa ribu ringgit sebenarnya tidak terlalu besar, perkara penting adalah melihat nisbah harga dan prestasi serta kos penggunaan jangka panjang secara keseluruhan.
Penarafan keselamatan Honda CR-V ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Penarafan keselamatan Chery Tiggo 9 ialah TBD, sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk Basic.
Dari segi peralatan keselamatan, kedua-dua model telah menerima penarafan yang baik. Walau bagaimanapun, Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM) pada Honda CR-V dan Basic pada Chery Tiggo 9 mempunyai perbezaan dari segi fungsi. Jika anda lebih menumpukan kepada keselamatan aktif, anda boleh membandingkan senarai fungsi kedua-duanya dengan teliti.
Honda CR-V panjang kenderaan 4500 mm, ruang bagasi 450 L.
Chery Tiggo 9 panjang kenderaan 4400 mm, ruang bagasi 400 L.
Dari segi ruang, badan Honda CR-V adalah 100 mm lebih panjang daripada Chery Tiggo 9, ruang duduk dalam kenderaan akan sedikit lebih luas, terutamanya ruang kaki di kerusi belakang. Jika anda sering mengangkut keluarga atau memerlukan untuk meletakkan kerusi bayi, badan kereta yang lebih besar memang lebih praktikal.
Honda CR-V jaminan 5 tahun/tanpa had jarak, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Chery Tiggo 9 jaminan 3 tahun/100,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Secara keseluruhannya, Honda CR-V dan Chery Tiggo 9 kedua-duanya adalah model yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana satu, kuncinya adalah melihat keperluan peribadi dan bajet anda. Kami menyarankan anda membuat penyelidikan terlebih dahulu, membandingkan beberapa tawaran dari kedai kereta yang berbeza, kemudian buat ujian memandu untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa untuk membuat penyelidikan pasti tidak akan salah.
The US is getting serious again. This time, it is not just targeting China. An import investigation covering the globe and spanning all tire categories is being pushed to the negotiation table. For domestic tire companies regarding "overseas factory construction" as a tax evasion scheme, this might be the most dangerous hurdle in the past decade.
US Gunpoint Targets Chinese Overseas Tire Factories
September 14, Roxanne Brown, International President of the United Steelworkers (USW), wrote to US Trade Representative Jamison Greer, formally proposing a major application: launching a global safeguard investigation on all categories of imported tires pursuant to Section 201 of the "Trade Act of 1974".
Unlike the familiar anti-dumping and special safeguards of the past, the biggest change in this application is breaking away from the traditional thinking of "targeting a specific country", incorporating passenger car&light truck tires, truck/bus tires, off-road engineering tires, and aircraft tires entirely into the investigation scope.
The union stated bluntly that past scattered and fragmented trade remedy measures could no longer keep up with the reality of industrial relocation.
Simply put: Previously, when the US imposed tariffs on tires from Country A, companies would transfer capacity to Country B, not subject to tariffs, changing the origin to continue exporting to the US. Tariff barriers were easily circumvented by relocating capacity.
Letter data shows, the highest increase in tire exports to the US from countries like Serbia, Cambodia, Peru reached 429%. This is the "loop of loopholes" that USW fears most.
Especially many Chinese tire companies chose to build factories overseas, to avoid existing trade barriers. And this Section 201 application aims precisely at this circuitous route to go global.
The Industry Crisis Mentioned by the US Union
USW repeatedly emphasized in the open letter that the US domestic tire industry has fallen into crisis, even elevating tire manufacturing to the national security level. Tires are the basic guarantee for transportation, agriculture, mining, and industrial operations. Continuous decline in domestic capacity will directly impact supply chain security.
A set of core data warrants attention:
China is the core of the union's argument. According to USW letters, Chinese capacity continues to expand—2025 automotive tire production is about 865 million units, total capacity exceeds 1 billion units.
Looking back at history, USW pushed for the "421 Special Safeguard" case targeting Chinese tires as early as 2009, also the only successful case of this clause, but measures expired in 2012. Subsequent multiple anti-dumping cases all encountered the same problem: restricting exports of one country, capacity transfers rapidly, trade restriction effects are greatly diminished.
Also for this reason, the union is no longer satisfied with single-point strikes, demands upgraded to global tiered import restrictions, while supporting local industry plans, including domestic production capital subsidies, government priority procurement of domestic tires, etc.
Imported Tires Slightly Decline, But Risks Are Not Short-term
Latest customs statistics, in the first 7 months of 2026, US imported tires totaled 162.34 million units, down 3.9% year-on-year.
Passenger Car Tires: 98.02 million units, year-on-year -2%
Truck/Bus Tires: 34.52 million units, year-on-year -8%
Aircraft Tires: 183,000 units, year-on-year +18%
Motorcycle Tires: 2.07 million units, year-on-year -9%
Bicycle Tires: 4.67 million units, year-on-year +20%
American Tire Manufacturers Association (USTMA) July forecast, 2026 US total tire shipments 330.3 million units, down 1.8% year-on-year, market demand itself is weak.
USW also knows, short-term import data has declined, but they are concerned about the long-term supply shock brought by capacity transfer, rather than fluctuations in a single year. As long as global excess capacity can continue to transfer to barrier-free countries, the trend of US domestic factory shutdowns is hard to reverse.
The Impact on Domestic Tire Enterprises, Must Understand
Currently, this investigation is only a union application, not officially filed yet. Subsequently, it needs USTR evaluation, ITC injury investigation, final measures implementation ruled by the US President, overall carrying significant uncertainty.
But once filed and measures implemented, impact will far exceed past trade frictions. Unlike country-specific anti-dumping, special safeguards, Section 201 is a global safeguard measure, regardless of origin, Chinese domestic tires, tires produced by Chinese-funded overseas bases in Thailand/Cambodia/Serbia, exports to US will be uniformly constrained, completely impacting the industry's core model of overseas factory construction, transshipment tax avoidance followed for over ten years.
Domestic tire factories were already restricted by high tariffs on China, this time direct impact is limited; Chinese-funded overseas capacity will become the main bearing subject.
More critically, this Section 201 investigation is after Section 232 (25% tariff), Section 301 tariff, the third core tool of US tire trade barriers. If USTR accepts filing, it will form 232+301+201 triple tariff barrier structure, letting domestic and overseas tire exports to US fall into systematic risk.
Meanwhile Mexico, Canada rely on USMCA agreement enjoying trade exemption advantages, North American tire supply pattern may welcome reshaping. The USTR filing result in the next 30 days is the core key variable determining the direction of global tire trade.
Conclusion
From 2009 single country special safeguard, to now seeking global scope all categories tire safeguard investigation, to possible landing "Triple Tariff Structure", the net of US tire trade protection is getting tighter and tighter.
This is no longer simple trade friction targeting a certain country, but trying to build a global coverage protection net, plugging loopholes in capacity transfer. For domestic tire industry, this is a major warning. Going overseas layout, can no longer only take "changing origin" as a panacea for risk avoidance.
Market negotiations continue, every step of filing, investigation, and ruling is worth tire industry professionals closely monitoring.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿本田 CR-V 同奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 嚟比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
本田 CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 178,200 令吉 - 195,900 令吉，合共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS（195,900 令吉）、2026 1.5T 4WD V（181,900 令吉）、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E（178,200 令吉） 等。
奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 129,750 令吉 - 129,750 令吉，合共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 1.5T 90km CSH（129,750 令吉）、Tiggo 7 PHEV 支援哪些充電方式？能否使用家用電源插座充電？（117,478 令吉） 等。
由價錢嚟睇，奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅起標價比本田 CR-V 平咗 48,450 令吉。坦白講，喺呢個價位段，幾千塊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲要睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
本田 CR-V 嘅安全評級係 5 星 (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括本田 SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。
奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅安全評級係 待定，主動安全系統包括 基本。
安全配備方面，兩部車都揾到唔錯嘅評級。不過本田 CR-V 嘅本田 SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM) 同奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅 基本 喺功能上有少少分別，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
本田 CR-V 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩部車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 前輪驅動，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
本田 CR-V 保養保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000 公里或 6 個月。
奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 保養保修 3 年/100,000 公里，保養間隔 每 10,000 公里或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，本田 CR-V 同奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，然後去試駕先至做出最終決定。買車係件大事，費啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
中国新能源汽车的出海之路，并不是想象中的一马平川。中国新能源汽车在海外市场的竞争，也并非想象中的易如反掌。
对于海外市场消费者来说，本土产品以及日系产品依旧有着不可替代的吸引力。
除了星光730。
国内达成10个月15万级MPV销冠的成绩的同时，星光730泰国市场也力压日系MPV，拿下泰国8月全品类MPV销冠的成绩。
一台起源于国内的MPV，为什么能打破当地日系MPV的垄断地位，赢得泰国高净值用户青睐？
在日系MPV的主场逆袭，原因是？
东南亚市场一向是中国汽车出海的主要目的地，其中又数泰国最为关键。然而在这片规模庞大、新能源汽车接受度高的市场中，日系品牌一直统治着MPV品类。
完整的生产供应链，长期形成的购车消费观念，种种因素叠加，让泰国当地的家庭和政企在采购MPV时，倾向于优先选择日系MPV。
可也恰恰是在这样的市场背景之下，来自上汽通用五菱的星光730“后来者居上”，一举拿下泰国8月全品类MPV的销量第一。
星光730能够登顶，不仅仅是把产品造好了，更是从生产供应到消费习惯的全面突破。这份成绩的含金量，不言而喻。
更加值得注意的是，星光730并不仅仅是凭借出色的产品力，实现了在家庭用户群体中的热销。政企采购、高端酒店合作订单，在星光730的销量构成中也占有非常关键的比重。
和更加看重产品配置、价格的家庭用户不同的是，政企以及高端酒店在采购时往往会将产品口碑和认可度排在第一位。这是因为商用场合，产品的标签属性是第一位属性。
而星光730能同时收到私人市场和商用市场的双重认可，能同时被泰国不同圈层的用户接纳，意味着星光730不仅仅是凭借高质价比，而是在品牌力和社交属性层面也实现了对以丰田埃尔法为代表的日系MPV的反超。
这不是一家之言和一隅之间，直白的数据能够予以佐证。
根据针对泰国当地市场的车主调研，星光730的购车群体以社会中坚力量为主。具体表现为，30-50岁的用户占比达到了76%，这部分年龄段的用户已经渡过了看重车辆新鲜感的阶段，更加在意一款车的社交价值和长期体验。
另外，星光730用户的职业分布中，经商人员、公司雇员、公务员合计占 87%，其中经商人员占比达到 38%。63%车主折合月收入在一万元人民币以上，25%车主月收入超过两万元人民币，属于泰国当地的高净值圈层。
更加值得注意的是，星光730的泰国用户中，又47%的车主都直接选择了全款购车。这背后的原因并不是泰国用户预算充足、不差钱，而是他们对星光730和上汽通用五菱这个品牌给予了十足的信心。
为什么星光730能获得泰国高净值群体的认可？为什么星光730能同时收到商用和家用两类消费群体的一致欣赏？
我们依旧用直白客观的数字解答。
就以家用为例，星光730的家庭用户群体中，91%的车主家庭人口在3人及以上，5人以上的大家庭用户群体占比更是将近40%。
多口之家最为关注的是用车的舒适性和整车的安全性。而星光730用电滑门、7座布局以及长续航和大空间，对家庭用户的出行需求进行了严丝合缝的对接。
能够获得泰国当地消费者的认可，能够在日系MPV市占率80%的市场中实现超越，最本质的原因是星光730精准满足了消费者的需求，并且在此基础上实现了比日系MPV更高的满足。
当商人、医生、公务员这些不同职业的高净值群体选择星光730的时候，他们已经因为星光730过硬的产品实力和稳定的产品口碑带来的实力，跳出了“唯日系品牌论”的固有观念。
他们为之买单的不是某个品牌的logo和国别，也不是品牌的溢价，而是品牌背后产品本身的价值。
星光730，有这样的高价值。
对的产品，对的模式，才能有成功的出海
在出海过程中，很容易被误解的一点是，不同市场对产品的需求是大相径庭的。很容易被忽略的另一点是，全球家庭对车辆的底层诉求其实是高度一致的。
就比如MPV，无论是中国还是泰国的消费者，最底层的诉求都是空间宽敞、体验舒适、用车无焦虑。即便是商用群体，也是在此基础上增加了对社交属性的高度需求。
因此在打造一款MPV的时候，星光730并没有专门以国别隔离用户群体，而是去观察、理解并呈现全球消费者对一款优秀MPV的普适性需求。
就比如全系标配的双侧滑门，提供9种控制方式的基础上，还搭配了智能防夹功能，在B柱处还设置了拉手。对于家庭用户来说，这一系列细节人性化设计可以方便老年人和孩童的上下车。对于商用的用户来说，这一系列则可以让乘客更加从容体面的上下车，在细节处让用户感受到被尊重。
再以动力形式为例，星光730基于同级领先“天·灵·神”五菱原生新能源技术底座，原生适配插电混动PHEV、纯电EV、燃油三种动力形式，带来同级唯一的“一车三动力”，把选择权交给用户。
包括2+2+3的真七座布局、纯电版本500km的续航（CLTC工况下），这些配置表现展现出了不同职业、不同用途、不同国别的MPV用户都需要并且想要的宽敞、无忧体验。
以往，再星光730出现以前，对于泰国MPV用户来说不是得不到满足。而是只有日系MPV能够予以还算说的过去的满足，并且是在价格高企、需要加价、加钱选装的前提下。消费者不是完全自愿的倒向了日系MPV，而是无奈之下只能以更高的成本选择日系MPV。
直到星光730的出现，他们的底层诉求被品牌前期充分的市场调研看到了。
值得其他想要成功出海的品牌借鉴的是，星光730自开发之初，就依托上汽通用五菱智能岛制造体系，以国际标准完成整车制造。这样做带来的成果是，不论是国内还是海外市场，用户得到的都是不被妥协和区别对待的好产品。
这也是为什么，星光730能斩获“双冠王”的头衔。
当一个品牌在打造一款全球产品的时候，以全球最高的标准自我要求，那么这样的产品无论放在任何地域市场中，都不会蒙尘。
不去做区别，而是做到最高标准，“万车如一”。如此一来，星光730的口碑也才会放之四海而皆准。
这也提醒了其他品牌，在国产汽车出海的新阶段，单纯依靠低价已经很难打入成熟市场。普适且硬核的产品力，深度的本土化运营，稳定可靠的品质，才是打开全球市场的正确钥匙。
写在最后
国内市场连续10个月拿下15万以内MPV销量第一，泰国8月全品类MPV销量第一。耀眼的“双冠王”头衔，背后是新能源最大市场、最前沿阵地的实力认可，以及海外成熟市场对这款全球车产品力的检验和欣赏。
当全球消费者都越来越理性、不再盲目迷信品牌溢价的光环，当全球消费者都越来越高要求、不再止步于“不得不”和“差不多”，当全球新能源汽车行业都走向成熟，大浪淘沙之后，留下来的是既有面子也有里子的产品。
星光730就是这样的产品，却不是上汽通用五菱最后一款这样的产品。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-80 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Honda CR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 178,200 - 195,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200), etc.
The Mazda CX-80 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 296,610 - 296,610, with a total of 1 version, including 2025 2.5L 65km High Plus (RM 296,610), etc.
From a price perspective, the Honda CR-V's starting price is indeed RM 118,410 cheaper than the Mazda CX-80. If your budget is limited, Honda's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, be aware that the few thousand cheaper price might involve compromises on features, depending on your specific needs.
The Honda CR-V safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
The Mazda CX-80 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including Brand ADAS.
Both cars have the same safety rating. In this class, safety features are quite comprehensive. New cars nowadays have good safety standards, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Honda CR-V body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
Mazda CX-80 body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. Cars in this class are more than enough for daily use.
Honda CR-V adopts FWD drive method.
Mazda CX-80 adopts FWD drive method.
Both cars have the same drive method, both are FWD, and there won't be much difference in daily driving experience.
Overall, both the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-80 are excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test-driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter; spending some time doing research will definitely not be wrong.
買車嘅時候，你會介意「呢部車拿到歐洲能夠賣嗎」？絕大多數人唔會。但恰恰係呢個問題，決定咗一台車嘅安全底線、耐久品質同真實續航。一台能夠賣到歐洲嘅車，同你身邊嗰啲「只喺國內跑」嘅車，從根上就唔一樣。
二零二六年八月二十六日，風雲 T7 正式上市。呢款車嘅特別之處在於——佢先完成咗海外市場嘅嚴苛考驗，再回到國內。而支撐佢走向全球嘅，係一套遠超同級嘅安全標準體系。
Euro NCAP（歐洲新車安全評鑑協會）係全球最嚴苛嘅安全測試體系之一。2026 版標準高於當前歐洲市場法規要求。
風雲 T7 提前 2 年開始預研呢套標準。功能安全達到 ASIL D 最高等級。即將進入歐洲高法規市場。
這唔係「夠用就得」嘅安全，而係安全有餘量。
風雲 T7 嘅安全配備，全系都一樣磐石車身：九橫五縱籠式結構高強度鋼佔比 80%，熱成型鋼佔比 18.84%。
九橫五縱籠式車身結構。Shotgun 結構（同級獨有） ——增加傳力通道，分散碰撞能量。雙框副車架+Pack 防撞梁（同級首發） ——兼顧整車抗衝擊與電池底部防托底。
1088mm 貫穿式軋壓門檻加強梁。前碰 6 條傳力路徑、側碰 9 條傳力路徑。
9 個安全氣囊：同級最多前排氣囊×2、前側氣囊×2、後排側氣囊×2、側氣簾×2、遠端氣囊×1。
48L 雙腔遠端氣囊、1778mm 一體式側氣簾。突發意外時，最大程度守護每一位家庭成員嘅生存空間。
6D 鎖子甲電池防護：31 層防護31 層防護結構，三橫一縱設計。全方位抵禦擠壓、穿刺、衝擊。
IP68 防水，國標 96 倍——無懼雨季內澇、路面積水、戶外涉水。
側邊抗擠壓 200kN，國標 2 倍——遭遇側面撞擊時電池包唔易變形破損。
1008 小時鹽霧測試、105 秒火燒測試（國標 1.5 倍） 。
風雲 T7 安全配備一覽安全配備
風雲 T7
安全標準
2026 版 E-NCAP 五星
功能安全等級
ASIL D
高強度鋼佔比
80%
熱成型鋼佔比
18.84%
車身結構
九橫五縱籠式
安全氣囊
9 個（同級最多）
電池防護
6D 鎖子甲 31 層
防水等級
IP68（國標 96 倍）
側邊抗擠壓
200kN（國標 2 倍）
「六大餘量」：安全唔係及格，係留足餘量風雲 T7 嘅「六大餘量」產品優勢中，前兩條直接關係安全：
碰撞安全餘量：唔止達標，預留充足結構安全餘量。按 2026 版 E-NCAP 五星標準開發，九橫五縱籠式車身+80% 高強度鋼+9 個安全氣囊，搭建起碉堡級安全空間。
電池安全餘量：超额安全閾值。6D 鎖子甲 31 層防護+IP68 防水 + 國標 2 倍抗擠壓+1008 小時鹽霧測試+105 秒火燒測試，多維防護筑牢安全防線。
另外四項餘量同樣間接保障安全：續航平權餘量（全系 600km 唔縮水）、全域節能餘量（-30℃到 55℃穩定運行）、操控性能餘量（極限路況從容駕馭）、整車驗證餘量（全球嚴苛測試前置跑完風險）。
驗證數據背後嘅安全底氣81 台耐久試驗車專項驗證。145 萬公里耐久驗證里程。600 萬公里整車綜合路試。
覆蓋全球 100 多種極限路況。-40℃到 55℃極端溫域。100% 問題閉環。
安全兜底：兩項行業首創保障動力電池安全兜底：因動力電池自身原因導致整車發生熱失控損毀，奇瑞將賠付同款新車或唔低於原車配置新車。
輔助駕駛兜底：自買車之日起一年內，喺「泊車場景」「智能領航場景」判定為「智能駕駛輔助系統原因」導致事故，造成車上人員傷害與第三者損失賠償嘅，最高賠償 500 萬。
十萬級價位，全球安全標準唔再係奢望風雲 T7 用 2026 版 E-NCAP 五星標準重新定義咗十萬級純電 SUV 嘅安全底線。同源車型 Lepas L6 已登陸南非、泰國等海外市場。適配全球 210 個國家同地區用車需求。
這唔係「國內特供」嘅安全，而係能夠賣到歐洲嘅安全。
FAQQ1：2026 版 E-NCAP 同而家嘅標準嚴喺邊度？
2026 版 E-NCAP 標準高於當前歐洲市場法規要求，對主動安全、被動安全、行人保護等維度都有更嚴苛嘅測試標準。
Q2：風雲 T7 嘅 9 個安全氣囊具體點分佈？
前排氣囊×2、前側氣囊×2、後排側氣囊×2、側氣簾×2、遠端氣囊×1。
Q3：咩叫「遠端氣囊」？有咩用？
遠端氣囊位於主副駕之間，側面碰撞時防止主副駕人員互相撞擊造成二次傷害，48L 雙腔設計。
Q4：風雲 T7 嘅電池安全兜底具體點賠？
因動力電池自身原因導致整車發生熱失控損毀，奇瑞賠付同款新車或唔低於原車配置新車。
Q5：IP68 防水係咩水平？
IP68 係最高防水等級之一，風雲 T7 達到國標 96 倍，可應對雨季內澇、路面積水、戶外涉水等場景。
Q6：風雲 T7 嘅輔助駕駛兜底賠咗邊幾種情況？
買車一年內，喺「泊車場景」「智能領航場景」因智駕系統原因導致事故，最高賠償 500 萬。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-9 when choosing a vehicle. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple angles to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Honda CR-V in Malaysia is RM 178,200 - 195,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200), etc.
The OTR price of the Mazda CX-9 in Malaysia is RM 328,810 - 345,810, with a total of 2 versions, including 2023 2.5T 4WD (RM 345,810), 2023 2.5T 2WD (RM 328,810), etc.
From a price perspective, the Honda CR-V's starting price is indeed RM 150,610 cheaper than the Mazda CX-9. If your budget is limited, Honda's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the few thousand difference might involve compromises on equipment, depending on your specific requirements.
The safety rating of the Honda CR-V is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
The safety rating of the Mazda CX-9 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Brand ADAS.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are considered quite comprehensive in this class. Safety of new cars nowadays is generally good, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Honda CR-V adopts FWD drive method.
Mazda CX-9 adopts FWD drive method.
Both cars use the same drive method, both are FWD, and there will not be too much difference in daily driving experience.
Honda CR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-9 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-9 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test drive before making a final decision. Buying a car is a major matter; spending time on research will definitely not be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-5 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Honda CR-V in Malaysia is RM 178,200 - 195,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200) etc.
The OTR price of the Mazda CX-5 in Malaysia is RM 135,469 - 166,760, with a total of 3 versions, including 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary (RM 316,154), 2025 2.0L AT (RM 296,154), 2025 2.0L MT (RM 294,154) etc.
Looking at the price, the starting price of the Mazda CX-5 is RM 42,731 cheaper than the Honda CR-V. Honestly, in this price range, the difference of a few thousand is not that big; the key is to look at overall cost-performance and long-term maintenance costs.
The Honda CR-V is equipped with a 2.0L 4-cyl engine, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
The Mazda CX-5 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Honda CR-V's 2.0L 4-cyl has 30 more horsepower than the Mazda CX-5's 1.5L Turbo, providing more confidence in mid-range acceleration, especially when overtaking on highways. However, the Mazda CX-5 might have better fuel economy, and the difference in daily city commuting would not be too big.
Honda CR-V body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
Mazda CX-5 body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. For cars in this class, they are more than enough for daily use.
Honda CR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-5 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-5 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, comparing quotes from several car dealers, and then test-driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big deal; spending some time doing research will never be wrong.
Dalam pasaran SUV Malaysia, ramai pembeli semasa memilih kereta membandingkan Honda CR-V dengan Mazda CX-60. Kedua-dua kereta ini mempunyai harga dan posisi pasaran yang hampir sama. Hari ini kita akan buat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa mencari maklumat.
Harga OTR Honda CR-V di Malaysia ialah RM 178,200 - 195,900, ada 4 versi termasuk 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Mazda CX-60 di Malaysia ialah RM 200,510 - 252,873, ada 2 versi termasuk 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus (RM 252,873), 2025 2.5L 2WD High (RM 200,510) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Honda CR-V memang lebih murah RM 22,310 berbanding Mazda CX-60. Jika bajet anda terhad, versi masuk Honda sudah cukup untuk keperluan harian. Namun perlu diingat, penjimatan beberapa ribu ringgit itu mungkin melibatkan kompromi dari segi kelengkapan, bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Honda CR-V dilengkapi enjin 2.0L 4-cyl, kuasa 170 hp. Konsumsi minyak rasmi 8.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-60 dilengkapi enjin 2.0L 4-cyl, kuasa 170 hp. Konsumsi minyak rasmi 8.0 L/100km.
Kedua-dua kereta menggunakan sistem kuasa yang sama, pengalaman memandu harian hampir tiada perbezaan. Dari segi konsumsi minyak juga hampir sama, tidak perlu terlalu bimbang dengan hal ini.
Panjang badan Honda CR-V ialah 4500 mm, bak muatan belakang 450 L.
Panjang badan Mazda CX-60 ialah 4500 mm, bak muatan belakang 450 L.
Saiz kedua-dua kereta hampir sama, ruang dalaman juga tidak berbeza banyak. Untuk kelas kereta ini, untuk penggunaan harian sudah memadai sepenuhnya.
Honda CR-V dan Mazda CX-60 adalah pilihan utama dalam pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga dan perjalanan harian. Jika anda lebih mengutamakan reputasi jenama dan harga jual semula, pertimbangkan model yang lebih mempunyai reputasi; jika anda lebih fokus kepada nilai berbaloi dan kelengkapan, pilih model dengan kelengkapan yang lebih kaya. Akhir sekali, disyorkan untuk uji memandu kedua-dua model, pengalaman sendiri adalah yang paling penting.
Secara keseluruhan, Honda CR-V dan Mazda CX-60 adalah model kereta yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih mana satu, ia bergantung kepada keperluan peribadi dan bajet anda. Disyorkan untuk mencari maklumat dengan teliti, bandingkan harga dari beberapa kedai kereta, kemudian buat ujian memandu untuk keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa mencari maklumat tidak akan salah.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Honda CR-V 同 Mazda CX-8 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，而家我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你慳返做功課嘅時間。
Honda CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 178,200 - 195,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS（RM 195,900）、2026 1.5T 4WD V（RM 181,900）、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E（RM 178,200） 等。
Mazda CX-8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 165,360 - 201,360，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol（RM 201,360）、2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel（RM 193,123）、2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol（RM 186,360） 等。
睇返價錢，Mazda CX-8 嘅起步價比 Honda CR-V 平咗 RM 12,840。坦白講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Honda CR-V 采用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mazda CX-8 采用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Honda CR-V 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-8 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Honda CR-V 同 Mazda CX-8 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最尾始終建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總括嚟講，Honda CR-V 同 Mazda CX-8 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
Dalam pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli akan membandingkan Honda CR-V dan Mazda CX-30 ketika memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kereta ini hampir sama dari segi harga dan positioning, hari ini kita akan buat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek, membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Honda CR-V di Malaysia mempunyai harga OTR RM 178,200 - 195,900, terdapat 4 versi, termasuk 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200) dan lain-lain.
Mazda CX-30 di Malaysia mempunyai harga OTR RM 122,409 - 146,409, terdapat 4 versi, termasuk 2025 2.0L High+ Premium (RM 146,409), 2025 2.0L High+ (RM 138,409), 2025 2.0L High (RM 130,409) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Mazda CX-30 adalah RM 55,791 lebih murah berbanding Honda CR-V. Jujurnya, dalam julat harga ini, perbezaan beberapa ribu sebenarnya tidak besar, yang penting adalah melihat nilai keseluruhan dan kos penggunaan jangka panjang.
Honda CR-V panjang kenderaan 4500 mm, ruang bagasi 450 L.
Mazda CX-30 panjang kenderaan 4500 mm, ruang bagasi 450 L.
Saiz kedua-dua kereta hampir sama, ruang dalaman tidak banyak berbeza. Kereta dalam kategori ini, cukup untuk kegunaan harian.
Honda CR-V waranti 5 tahun/kilometer tanpa had, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Mazda CX-30 waranti 5 tahun/150,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Honda CR-V dan Mazda CX-30 adalah pilihan utama di pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga dan perjalanan harian. Jika anda lebih mengutamakan reputasi jenama dan harga bekas, boleh pertimbangkan yang mempunyai reputasi lebih baik; jika anda lebih mengutamakan nilai dan kelengkapan, pilih yang mempunyai konfigurasi lebih lengkap. Akhir sekali disarankan untuk memandu uji kedua-dua model, pengalaman langsung adalah yang paling penting.
Secara keseluruhannya, Honda CR-V dan Mazda CX-30 adalah model yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana, yang penting adalah melihat keperluan peribadi dan bajet anda. Disyorkan untuk membuat kajian, bandingkan tawaran daripada beberapa kedai kereta, kemudian buat keputusan akhir selepas memandu uji. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa untuk kajian tidak akan salah.
Smart vehicles participated for the first time. (Photo by Xia Tiantian)
■ Reporter from China Industry Daily Qi Xiaoling
On August 30, the closing ceremony and award presentation of the 2026 China Society of Automotive Engineers Baja Race Tongxiang Station was successfully held in Tongxiang, Zhejiang. Heads of industry societies, science associations, automotive enterprises, and university competition personnel attended the event, reviewing the race process and commending the winning teams together with event partners, referees, and participating teachers and students. This competition welcomed Smart Baja for its formal debut for the first time, while attracting overseas teams to compete on the same stage. It demonstrated the practical innovation capabilities of domestic young automotive talents from all aspects through education via racing and promotion of innovation via racing.
Hou Fushen, Vice Chairman and Secretary-General of the China Society of Automotive Engineers, stated in his address that the research and manufacturing of Baja racing vehicles is a systematic engineering project where young students balance performance, reliability, cost, and safety throughout the entire process of design, manufacturing, debugging, and verification, requiring practical acceptance tests on real tracks. The competition brings students not only practical accumulation of vehicle manufacturing technology but also cultivates their comprehensive qualities in dealing with unknown problems, collaborative breakthroughs, and taking responsibility. This is also the core value of the Baja Race: "Practical Education and Challenging Limits".
Hou Fushen pointed out that currently new technologies such as new energy and artificial intelligence are deeply integrated with the automotive industry, and the industry's interdisciplinary development characteristics are becoming more prominent. The industrial transformation urgently requires young talents with solid professional foundations, systematic thinking, practical abilities, and innovative spirit. In the future, the China Society of Automotive Engineers will continue to practice the concept of "promoting teaching, learning, innovation, and industry through racing", deepen industry-education collaboration, integrate industry frontier topics, advanced R&D tools, and high-quality technical resources into the competition scenarios, help young students move from the classroom to the competition arena, from theory to practice, grow and become talents through practical training, and reserve high-quality talents for the high-quality development of the automotive industry.
It is understood that this Baja Race officially started on August 26. During the five-day competition, multiple racing teams from across the country sequentially completed vehicle technical inspections, static evaluations, and multiple dynamic race competitions, comprehensively testing the students' design and manufacturing, assembly and debugging, fault analysis, on-site repair, and team collaboration abilities. On the race course, there were intense competitions in speed racing, as well as the youth spirit of technical exchange and collaborative breakthroughs.
This competition welcomed a major innovative upgrade, with the Smart Baja project making its formal debut. Participating smart vehicles sequentially completed subject tests such as off-road straight obstacle racing, off-road single-lap timed racing, and off-road trace durability racing. Under complex off-road scenarios, core performance such as vehicle traction and directional stability, autonomous path planning, and system operation robustness were comprehensively verified, building a professional practical test platform for young students to explore the implementation and application of intelligent driving off-road scenarios.
The international atmosphere of the competition continued to heat up. Four university racing teams from Thailand were invited to participate. Chinese and foreign young students exchanged in-depth communications, competed on the same field, and learned from each other around racing design, manufacturing debugging, competition organization, etc., breaking geographical and language barriers, making the Baja race course a high-quality platform for domestic and international automotive youth to communicate, interact, and grow together.
The Automotive Technology New Media Talent Challenge ATMIC held concurrently focused on competition communication and industry popularization. Participating young people recorded the race scene style from a unique perspective, dug into team stories, and interpreted racing technology, popularizing automotive professional knowledge and disseminating race culture with vivid lenses and text, further enriching the educational connotation and communication dimensions of the competition.
During the holding of the event, Chongfu Town of Tongxiang City provided all-round, refined competition guarantees. Focusing precisely from event organization to life services, a safe, orderly, high-quality, and comfortable competition environment was created for all participating teachers, students, staff, and referees, fully guaranteeing the successful implementation of the event.
After five days of high-intensity, all-round fierce competition, the awards for all major groups of this competition were announced. The champion of the Smart Group was won by Beijing Institute of Technology; Hunan Automotive Engineering Vocational University and Wuhan University of Technology took the 2nd and 3rd places respectively; The champion of the Hydrogen Group was awarded to Sichuan Engineering Vocational University, with Western Yunnan University of Applied Technology and Guangzhou Industry and Trade Technician College ranking after them; The champion of the Off-road Upgrade Group was Geely University, with Ubon University and Hebei Institute of Science and Technology taking the 2nd and 3rd places respectively.
In addition, the results of the Electric Vehicle Group, Vocational School Group, and Undergraduate Group competitions were released simultaneously. Henan Institute of Technology took the championship of the Electric Vehicle Group; Sichuan Engineering Vocational University and Beijing Institute of Technology took the 2nd and 3rd places respectively; Guangxi Ecology and Engineering Vocational College topped the Vocational School Group; Guangxi Mechanical and Electrical Technician College and Chongqing Traffic Vocational College obtained the 2nd and 3rd places respectively; The Undergraduate Group champion was won by Liuzhou Institute of Technology; Beijing Institute of Technology and Sichuan Engineering Vocational University took the 2nd and 3rd places respectively.
According to introduction, the Baja Race has been cultivated for twelve years. Starting from 29 teams initially, it has grown into a youth practice competition platform with great influence in the domestic automotive field. This competition attracted 122 teams from 86 institutions. Participating students autonomously completed the entire process of racing car design, manufacturing, assembly, debugging, verification, and competition, transforming classroom theory into practical solutions, honing skills and increasing capabilities through repeated testing, tackling difficulties, and team collaboration.
The organizers of the competition stated that the end of the competition is a new starting point for young students to deepen their work in the automotive field and chase dreams of industrial futures. In the future, the Society will continue to gather resources from universities, enterprises, and all sectors of society, continue to improve the competition system and enrich competition content, introduce more industry frontier resources, continuously build a broad stage for young talents to practice innovation, compete, and exchange, and continuously deliver high-quality innovative and practical young talents for the industrial transformation and upgrade and innovative development of the Chinese automotive industry.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Honda CR-V 同 Mazda CX-3 嚟比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Honda CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 178,200 至 195,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS（RM 195,900）、2026 1.5T 4WD V（RM 181,900）、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E（RM 178,200） 等。
Mazda CX-3 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 126,159 至 139,159，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2023 2.0L High（RM 139,159）、2023 2.0L Plus（RM 126,159） 等。
由價錢睇，Mazda CX-3 嘅起售價比 Honda CR-V 平咗 RM 52,041。講真，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Honda CR-V 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mazda CX-3 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Honda CR-V 保修 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-3 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Honda CR-V 同 Mazda CX-3 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用車、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更重視性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總體嚟講，Honda CR-V 同 Mazda CX-3 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拎本田 CR-V 同豐田 Fortuner 做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好相近，今日我就從多個方面做一次詳細嘅對比，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
本田 CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 178,200 - 195,900，合共 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS（RM 195,900）、2026 1.5T 4WD V（RM 181,900）、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E（RM 178,200） 等等。
豐田 Fortuner 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 195,880 - 241,880，合共 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.8T VRZ Diesel（RM 241,880）、2024 2.7L SRZ Petrol（RM 202,880）、2024 2.4L Standard Diesel（RM 195,880） 等等。
從價錢睇，本田 CR-V 嘅起步價真係比豐田 Fortuner 平咗 RM 17,680。如果你預算有限，本田嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要記住，平少少嘅幾千蚊，可能會喺配備上面有取舍，具體就要睇你嘅需求。
本田 CR-V 配備 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
豐田 Fortuner 配備 2.5L Diesel，馬力 187 hp。官方油耗 8.5 L/100km。
動力方面，豐田 Fortuner 嘅 2.5L Diesel 比本田 CR-V 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 多咗 17 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔使擔心唔夠力。
本田 CR-V 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括本田 SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。
豐田 Fortuner 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別裡面安全配備都算好齊全。
而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
本田 CR-V 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
豐田 Fortuner 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
總體嚟講，本田 CR-V 同豐田 Fortuner 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
© 2024 Bitauto.com. All Rights Reserved.
Bitauto (www.yiche.com and www.bitauto.com) is one of the most visited automotive websites in China. We provide detailed info on Chinese car brands available in your area. Please note that the information provided on this website is based on publicly available data and is for reference only. It may not be fully updated or accurate at all times.
Help us improve our website
