Homewellness
Search History
Popular Searches
Dealer Login / Sign Up
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Honda Civic 同 Toyota Vios 嚟做比較。今日我哋由多個方面做一次詳細比較，幫你省做功課嘅時間。
Honda Civic 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 133,900 - 167,900，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 e:HEV 2.0L RS（RM 167,900）、2025 1.5T RS（RM 149,900）、2025 1.5T V（RM 144,900） 等。
Toyota Vios 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 90,600 - 109,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L G（RM 96,600）、2026 1.5L E（RM 90,600）、2026 HEV 1.5L GR Sport（RM 109,900） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Toyota Vios 嘅起步價比 Honda Civic 平咗 RM 43,300。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千塊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Honda Civic 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Toyota Vios 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。
Honda Civic 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Toyota Vios 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問問真實車主嘅經驗。
Honda Civic 同 Toyota Vios 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總體嚟講，Honda Civic 同 Toyota Vios 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
Di pasaran SUV Malaysia, ramai pembeli membandingkan Proton X50 dan Kia Sportage ketika memilih kereta.
Harga OTR Proton X50 di Malaysia ialah RM 89,800 - 113,300, terdapat 4 varian termasuk 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Kia Sportage di Malaysia ialah RM 129,639 - 179,320, terdapat 4 varian termasuk 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High (RM 179,320), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High (RM 159,320), 2025 2.0L AT 2WD High (RM 139,639) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X50 memang lebih murah RM 39,839 berbanding Kia Sportage. Jika bajet anda terhad, varian asas Proton sudah cukup untuk keperluan harian. Namun, perlu diperhatikan, perbezaan harga beberapa ribu itu mungkin melibatkan pertukaran ciri-ciri, bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Proton X50 dilengkapi enjin 1.5L 4-silinder, kuasa 105 hp. Penggunaan minyak rasmi 6.0 L/100km.
Kia Sportage dilengkapi enjin 1.5L Turbo, kuasa 140 hp. Penggunaan minyak rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Dari segi kuasa, Turbo 1.5L Kia Sportage mempunyai 35 hp lebih berbanding 1.5L 4-silinder Proton X50. Namun untuk pemanduan harian di bandar, kuasa kedua-dua kereta sudah mencukupi, tidak akan terasa kurang tenaga.
Panjang badan Proton X50 4400 mm, ruang bagasi 400 L.
Panjang badan Kia Sportage 4400 mm, ruang bagasi 400 L.
Saiz kedua-dua kereta hampir sama, ruang dalaman tidak banyak berbeza. Kereta dalam kelas ini, penggunaan harian sudah cukup.
Proton X50 menggunakan kaedah penggerak 4WD.
Kia Sportage menggunakan kaedah penggerak FWD.
Penggerak 4WD Proton dan FWD Kia akan memberi rasa mengendalikan yang berbeza, dicadangkan untuk uji membandingkan.
Secara keseluruhan, Proton X50 dan Kia Sportage adalah model kereta yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana, penting lihat keperluan peribadi dan bajet anda. Kami cadangkan untuk membuat kajian, bandingkan beberapa tawaran kedai kereta, kemudian uji untuk keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa untuk kajian tidak akan salah.
Di pasaran SUV Malaysia, ramai pembeli membandingkan Proton X50 dan GWM Haval H6 semasa memilih kenderaan. Kedua-dua kereta ini hampir sama dari segi harga dan penentuan pasaran, hari ini kita akan buat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek, membantu anda menjimatkan masa melakukan kajian.
Harga OTR Proton X50 di Malaysia ialah RM 89,800 - 113,300, terdapat 4 varian, termasuk 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR GWM Haval H6 di Malaysia ialah RM 139,750 - 139,750, terdapat 2 varian, termasuk 1.5L Turbo Standard (RM 140,000), 1.5L Turbo Premium (RM 155,000) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X50 memang lebih murah RM 49,950 berbanding GWM Haval H6. Jika anda mempunyai bajet terhad, versi permulaan Proton sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Tetapi perlu diingatkan, beberapa ribu yang murah itu, mungkin ada kompromi dari segi kelengkapan, ia bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Penilaian keselamatan Proton X50 ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Penilaian keselamatan GWM Haval H6 ialah TBD, sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk Basic.
Dari segi kelengkapan keselamatan, kedua-dua kereta telah mendapat penilaian yang bagus. Walau bagaimanapun, ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) pada Proton X50 dan Basic pada GWM Haval H6 mempunyai perbezaan dari segi fungsi, jika anda lebih memprioritaskan keselamatan aktif, anda boleh membandingkan senarai fungsi kedua-duanya dengan teliti.
Jaminan Proton X50 5 tahun/150,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Jaminan GWM Haval H6 7 tahun/150,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Proton X50 dan GWM Haval H6 adalah pilihan utama pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga, perjalanan harian. Jika anda lebih memprioritaskan reputasi jenama dan harga jualan semula, anda boleh memprioritaskan jenama yang lebih mempunyai reputasi; jika anda lebih mementingkan nisbah harga dan prestasi serta kelengkapan, maka pilih versi yang lebih kaya dengan konfigurasi. Pada akhirnya, disarankan untuk memandu uji kedua-duanya, pengalaman langsung adalah yang paling penting.
Secara keseluruhan, Proton X50 dan GWM Haval H6 adalah model kereta yang sangat bagus di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih mana satu, kuncinya bergantung pada keperluan peribadi dan bajet anda. Kami cadangkan anda melakukan kajian terlebih dahulu, bandingkan sebut harga daripada beberapa pengedar kereta, kemudian buat ujian memandu untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa membuat kajian tidak akan salah.
在马来西亚的轿车市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Volkswagen Golf R 和 Mercedes-Benz E-Class PHEV 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Volkswagen Golf R 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 338,812 - 338,812，一共有 2 个版本，包括 2026 2.0T Standard（RM 338,812）、DCT（RM 294,800） 等。
Mercedes-Benz E-Class PHEV 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 427,888 - 427,888，一共有 2 个版本，包括 E 200 Avantgarde（RM 350,000）、E 300 AMG Line（RM 400,000） 等。
从价钱来看，Volkswagen Golf R 的起步价确实比 Mercedes-Benz E-Class PHEV 便宜了 RM 89,076。如果你预算有限，Volkswagen 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意，便宜的那几千块，可能在配备上会有取舍，具体要看你的需求。
Volkswagen Golf R 的安全评级是 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 IQ.Drive。
Mercedes-Benz E-Class PHEV 的安全评级是 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Premium ADAS。
两款车的安全评级一样，在这个级别里面安全配备都算给得很齐全了。现在的新车安全性都不差，不用太担心这一点。
Volkswagen Golf R 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
Mercedes-Benz E-Class PHEV 采用 FWD 驱动方式。
两款车的驱动方式一样，都是 FWD，日常驾驶感受不会有太大区别。
Volkswagen Golf R 保修 3年/100,000km，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
Mercedes-Benz E-Class PHEV 保修 3年/100,000km，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
两款车的保修条件一样，这方面不用纠结。实际保养成本还要看品牌的服务网络和零件价格，建议去车友群问问真实车主的经验。
Volkswagen Golf R 和 Mercedes-Benz E-Class PHEV 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择，适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价，可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款；如果你更在意性价比和配备，那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾，亲身体验才是最重要的。
总的来说，Volkswagen Golf R 和 Mercedes-Benz E-Class PHEV 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
在马来西亚的轿车市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Volkswagen Golf GTI 和 Mercedes-Benz E-Class PHEV 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Volkswagen Golf GTI 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 256,962 - 256,962，一共有 3 个版本，包括 2025 2.0T Sepang Edition（RM 262,990）、2025 2.0T Standard（RM 256,962）、DCT（RM 219,800） 等。
Mercedes-Benz E-Class PHEV 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 427,888 - 427,888，一共有 2 个版本，包括 E 200 Avantgarde（RM 350,000）、E 300 AMG Line（RM 400,000） 等。
从价钱来看，Volkswagen Golf GTI 的起步价确实比 Mercedes-Benz E-Class PHEV 便宜了 RM 170,926。如果你预算有限，Volkswagen 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意，便宜的那几千块，可能在配备上会有取舍，具体要看你的需求。
Volkswagen Golf GTI 的安全评级是 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 IQ.Drive。
Mercedes-Benz E-Class PHEV 的安全评级是 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Premium ADAS。
两款车的安全评级一样，在这个级别里面安全配备都算给得很齐全了。现在的新车安全性都不差，不用太担心这一点。
Volkswagen Golf GTI 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
Mercedes-Benz E-Class PHEV 车身长 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
两款车的尺寸几乎一样，车内空间差别不大。这个级别的车，日常使用完全够用。
Volkswagen Golf GTI 和 Mercedes-Benz E-Class PHEV 都是马来西亚市场的主流选择，适合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑和二手价，可以优先考虑口碑更好的那一款；如果你更在意性价比和配备，那就选配置更丰富的那款。最终还是建议两款都去试驾，亲身体验才是最重要的。
总的来说，Volkswagen Golf GTI 和 Mercedes-Benz E-Class PHEV 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
在马来西亚的SUV市场，很多买家在选车的时候都会拿 Mercedes-Benz GLA 和 Land Rover Discovery Sport 来做比较。这两款车在价位和定位上都蛮接近的，今天我们就从多个方面做一个详细的对比，帮你省下做功课的时间。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 258,888 - 295,888，一共有 1 个版本，包括 Standard（RM 258,888） 等。
Land Rover Discovery Sport 在马来西亚的 OTR 售价是 RM 499,800 - 499,800，一共有 1 个版本，包括 Standard（RM 499,800） 等。
从价钱来看，Mercedes-Benz GLA 的起步价确实比 Land Rover Discovery Sport 便宜了 RM 240,912。如果你预算有限，Mercedes-Benz 的入门版已经可以满足日常需求。但也要注意，便宜的那几千块，可能在配备上会有取舍，具体要看你的需求。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 搭载 2.0L Turbo，马力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
Land Rover Discovery Sport 搭载 3.0L Turbo，马力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
动力方面，Land Rover Discovery Sport 的 3.0L Turbo 比 Mercedes-Benz GLA 的 2.0L Turbo 多了 130 匹马力。不过日常在市区开，两款车的动力都够用，不会觉得不够力。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 的安全评级是 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主动安全系统包括 Premium ADAS。
Land Rover Discovery Sport 的安全评级是 TBD，主动安全系统包括 Basic。
安全配备方面，两款车都拿到了不错的评级。不过 Mercedes-Benz GLA 的 Premium ADAS 和 Land Rover Discovery Sport 的 Basic 在功能上有些差异，如果你比较看重主动安全的话，可以仔细对比一下两者的功能列表。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 保修 3年/100,000km，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
Land Rover Discovery Sport 保修 3年/100,000km，保养间隔 每10,000km或6个月。
两款车的保修条件一样，这方面不用纠结。实际保养成本还要看品牌的服务网络和零件价格，建议去车友群问问真实车主的经验。
总的来说，Mercedes-Benz GLA 和 Land Rover Discovery Sport 都是马来西亚市场很不错的车型。选择哪一辆，关键还是要看你的个人需求和预算。建议大家做好功课，多比较几间车行的报价，再去试驾做最终决定。买车是件大事，花点时间做功课绝对不会错。
車款概覽
奧迪 RS 3 值唔值買，關鍵唔係佢睇落有幾吸引，而係佢係咪能夠解決你嘅真實用車需求。呢篇文會重點放在長途穩定感同乘客舒適度。
價格落喺 RM 673,600，買家可以先用佢判斷預算壓力同同級定位。
購車價格指南
奧迪 RS 3 嘅購車預算可以從 RM 673,600 開始衡量。呢個數字真正影響嘅係月供、保險同現金流，而不係只係展廳入面嘅標價。
如果你喺幾個版本之間猶豫，可以把 2025 Sedan 2.5 TFSI quattro（RM 673,600） 放喺同一張清單入面比較。日常通勤買家優先睇舒適同安全，經常跑高速嘅買家則更加應重視動力、輔助駕駛同車廂便利。
核心參數匯總
睇奧迪 RS 3 嘅核心規格，最重要係將數字轉化為生活嘅感受。
渦輪增壓、5 缸嘅動力底子，適合拿來判斷市區同車同高速巡航係咪輕鬆。 400 Ps、500 N·m 嘅輸出，真正意義在於滿載、上坡同超車嗰陣唔會太吃力。 DCT 雙離合變速箱、四輪驅動佈局 嘅設定，會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航感。
優缺點分析
奧迪 RS 3 嘅優點無須誇張，真正有价值係佢係咪能夠令日常使用更省心：預算位置清楚，方便同級車直接比較、動力輸出能夠支撐高速同超車需求、同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
需要留意嘅係，最終取捨會落喺版本配置、保險同長期保養成本。呢啲唔係扣分項，而係落訂前應該先諗清楚嘅生活細節。
購車常見問題解答
購買奧迪 RS 3 前，買家最常問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢係咪能夠融入自己嘅生活。
呢部車適合邊個？適合把長途穩定感同乘客舒適度放喺第一位嘅買家。家庭用戶要看啲咩？優先睇後排乘坐、兒童座椅、行李同日常上下車係咪順手。每日開會唔會麻煩？如果能源成本、停車便利同版本配置都符合你嘅生活節奏，佢會比較容易相處。
競爭對手對比內容
把奧迪 RS 3 放進同級車名單時，唔建議只看品牌同外形。真正有用嘅比較順序係：先用 RM 673,600 鎖定預算圈、再看動力係咪足夠應付高速同滿載、最後看空間係咪適合家人同行李。
呢樣篩選出嚟嘅結果更加貼近日常生活。你會更加清楚佢係適合城市通勤、家庭代步、長途巡航，定係更加適合作爲一輛講求個性嘅選擇。
用車全週期指南
擁有奧迪 RS 3 嘅重點，係確認保險、路稅、保養同輪胎成本都在可接受範圍內。買車唔係一次過付款結束，而係每日都要相處。
如果你經常跑南北大道，動力同車廂舒適度會比單純低價更重要；如果主要喺市區，停車靈活性、視野同低速順滑度會更加影響心情。
Dalam pasaran SUV Malaysia, ramai pembeli membandingkan Proton X50 dan Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV semasa memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kereta ini mempunyai harga dan penjenamaan yang sangat hampir, hari ini kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek, membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Proton X50 di Malaysia harga OTR adalah RM 89,800 - 113,300, terdapat 4 varian, termasuk 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300) dan lain-lain.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV di Malaysia harga OTR adalah RM 129,750 - 129,750, terdapat 2 varian, termasuk 2025 1.5T 90km CSH (RM 129,750), Apakah kaedah pengecasan yang disokong oleh Tiggo 7 PHEV? Bolehkah ia dicas menggunakan socket kuasa rumah? (RM 117,478) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X50 memang lebih murah RM 39,950 berbanding Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV. Jika bajet anda terhad, versi permulaan Proton sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Tetapi perlu diingat, perbezaan harga beberapa ribu itu mungkin ada kompromi pada kelengkapan, bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Proton X50 dilengkapi enjin 1.5L 4-silinder, kuasa 105 hp. Penggunaan minyak rasmi 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV dilengkapi Hibrid, kuasa 170 hp. Penggunaan minyak rasmi 4.5 L/100km.
Dari segi kuasa, Hibrid Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV mempunyai 65 hp lebih daripada 1.5L 4-silinder Proton X50. Namun dalam penggunaan harian di bandar, kuasa kedua-dua kereta sudah mencukupi, tidak berasa kurang kuasa.
Paraf keselamatan Proton X50 ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Paraf keselamatan Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV ialah TBD, sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk Basic.
Dari segi pelengkap keselamatan, kedua-dua kereta mendapat paras yang baik. Namun ADAS Proton X50 (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) dan Basic Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV mempunyai perbezaan fungsi, jika anda mengutamakan keselamatan aktif, boleh bandingkan senarai fungsi kedua-duanya.
Proton X50 panjang kereta 4400 mm, ruang bagasi 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV panjang kereta 4400 mm, ruang bagasi 400 L.
Saiz kedua-dua kereta hampir sama, ruang dalaman tidak banyak berbeza. Kereta kelas ini sudah cukup untuk penggunaan harian.
Proton X50 menggunakan sistem pemanduan 4WD.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV menggunakan sistem pemanduan FWD.
4WD Proton dan FWD Chery memberikan rasa pengendalian yang berbeza, disarankan untuk test drive dan bandingkan.
Secara keseluruhan, Proton X50 dan Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV adalah model kereta yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Pemilihan mana satu, utama adalah lihat keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Disarankan untuk membuat kajian, bandingkan tawaran dari beberapa showroom, kemudian buat test drive untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa membuat kajian tidak akan salah.
Di pasaran SUV Malaysia, banyak pembeli yang membandingkan Proton X50 dan Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV semasa memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kereta ini sangat hampir dari segi harga dan kedudukan, hari ini kita akan buat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek, membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat tugasan.
Proton X50 di Malaysia harga OTR ialah RM 89,800 - 113,300, sebanyak 4 versi, termasuk 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300) dan sebagainya.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV di Malaysia harga OTR ialah RM 129,750 - 129,750, sebanyak 2 versi, termasuk 2025 1.5T 90km CSH (RM 129,750), Apakah kaedah pengecasan yang disokong oleh Tiggo 7 PHEV? Bolehkah ia dicas menggunakan soket kuasa rumah? (RM 117,478) dan sebagainya.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X50 memang lebih murah RM 39,950 berbanding Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV. Jika bajet anda terhad, versi permulaan Proton sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Tetapi perlu diingat, beribu ringgit lebih murah itu, mungkin ada pertimbangan pada kelengkapan, lihat keperluan anda.
Proton X50 dilengkapi enjin 1.5L 4-cyl, kuasa 105 hp. Penggunaan bahan api rasmi 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV dilengkapi Hibrid, kuasa 170 hp. Penggunaan bahan api rasmi 4.5 L/100km.
Dari segi kuasa, Hibrid Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV ada 65 hp lebih berbanding 1.5L 4-cyl Proton X50. Namun secara umumnya dalam bandar, kuasa kedua-dua kereta sudah cukup, tidak akan terasa kekurangan tenaga.
Proton X50 Jaminan 5 tahun/150,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV Jaminan 3 tahun/100,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Proton X50 dan Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV adalah pilihan utama di pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga, perjalanan harian. Jika anda lebih mementingkan reputasi jenama dan harga pasaran kedua, boleh utamakan jenama yang lebih dikenali; jika anda lebih mementingkan nilai kos dan kelengkapan, pilih model dengan spesifikasi lebih lengkap. Akhir sekali kami cadangkan kedua-dua model dicuba, pengalaman sendiri adalah yang paling penting.
Secara keseluruhannya, Proton X50 dan Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV adalah model kereta yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana satu, yang penting adalah keperluan dan bajet anda. Kami cadangkan anda sediakan maklumat, bandingkan harga di beberapa showroom, kemudian uji pemandian buat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa menyediakan maklumat tidak akan salah.
7 月 22 日，2026 泰中合作博覽會喺曼谷 IMPACT 會展中心舉行，本屆博覽會以「投資未來，共同成長」為主題，旨在貫徹泰中兩國領導人達成嘅重要共識，把握雙邊經貿合作持續深化嘅新機遇。中國輪胎商務網（Tirechina.net）獲悉，浦林成山借此寶貴機會積極融入泰中雙邊貿易體系，深度探索產業對接、市場拓展等合作機會，助力泰中產業高質量協同發展。
政企深度交流
本土化運營成果獲多方認可
博覽會期間，中國駐泰國大使館經濟商務處公使銜參贊江偉先生、泰國中華總商會主席林楚欽先生、泰國中國企業總商會主席劉全雷先生、泰國工業園區管理局（IEAT）局長素梅·當巴瑟先生等政商代表一併與浦林成山輪胎（泰國）有限公司總經理胥建剛先生就公司本土化深耕、智能化生產、全球化佈局、可持續發展等進行討論交流。
參會政商代表們高度肯定咗浦林成山自 2019 年扎根泰國以來嘅發展成果，對浦林成山泰國智能工廠（以下簡稱「泰國工廠」）嘅智能化生產水平、綠色化發展理念同促進泰中文化交流同當地經濟發展等方面嘅貢獻給予高度認可同讚譽，為後續合作奠定咗良好基礎。
智造 + 綠色雙賦能
泰國工廠築牢海外戰略支點
泰國工廠作為浦林成山嘅首個海外生產基地，係公司全球化戰略佈局嘅關鍵支點，有力助推咗泰中製造業經貿往來、產業協作與友好交流。喺生產端，工廠配備國際領先嘅壓延機及五複合新工藝，實現半成品、物流、分揀等工序嘅自動化、智能化營運。
喺綠色低碳發展方面，工廠深入踐行節能環保理念，堅持走可持續發展道路，建成東南亞最大嘅單體屋頂太陽能項目。喺社會責任方面，工廠積極投身泰國本地教育扶持、災害救援等公益事業，拉動地方就業、賦能青年發展，並主動搭建文化溝通橋樑，推動泰中民間文化互動交融，以務實行動深化兩國民心相通。
旗艦產品亮相
東南亞配套版圖持續擴容
浦林 AQUILA PRO 等節能、舒適、靜音等核心性能突出嘅泰國工廠旗艦產品一併亮相博覽會。目前，該輪胎已成功配套上汽名爵 MG5 PRO 泰國版、MG S5 EV 泰國版、長安啟源 NEVO Q05 等多款海外中高端車型。浦林成山喺東南亞配套市場持續深耕、穩步突破，與名爵、啟源等多家主流主機廠建立穩固深厚嘅戰略合作關係，攜手打造適配當地市場嘅優質出行解決方案，配套業務版圖持續擴容，合作生態邁向更高质量發展。
深化產業鏈協同
共繪出海發展新藍圖
此外，公司還與上游合作夥伴簽署咗合作備忘錄（Memorandum of Understanding，MOU），有助於進一步深化公司同泰國本地橡膠等上下游產業嘅深度融合與資源互補，推動區域輪胎產業鏈上下游協同發展。
未來，浦林成山將持續升級產品矩陣，強化本土化經營同產業鏈上下游協同佈局，依托泰中經貿合作平台，積極把握區域產業升級等寶貴嘅時代新機遇，以「中國智造」為泰中經貿共贏共榮添磚加瓦，書寫中國輪胎企業出海成長、互利共生嘅嶄新新篇章。
車型概覽
Audi S8 值唔值得買，關鍵唔係佢幾吸引，而係佢能唔能夠解決你嘅真實用車需求。呢篇文會集中喺落單前最易忽略嘅問題。
版本方面，Audi S8 目前可圍繞 2025 Standard 嚟比較。
購車價格指南
評估 Audi S8 嘅購車預算時，建議先由版本定位同後續養車成本入手。價格唔係唯一重點，真正決定係咪划算嘅係每日有無會用到嗰啲配置。
如果你喺幾個版本之間猶豫，可以把 2025 Standard 放喺同一份清單入面比較。日常通勤買家優先睇舒適同安全，經常行高速嘅買家則更應重視動力、輔助駕駛同車廂方便。
核心參數匯總
看 Audi S8 嘅核心規格，最重要係將數字轉化為生活嘅感受。
Audi S8 嘅核心價值應回到日常場景判斷：你要佢負責通勤、家庭出行、長途，定係作為更有個性嘅選擇。
優缺點分析
Audi S8 嘅優點唔使誇張，真正有價值嘅係佢能唔能夠讓日常使用更省心：車型定位清晰，適合先作為同級比較對象。
要留意係，最終取捨會落喺版本配置、保險同長期保養成本。呢啲唔係扣分項，而係落單前應該先想清楚嘅生活細節。
購車常見問題解答
購買 Audi S8 前，買家最常問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢能唔能融入自己嘅生活。
呢架車適合邊個？適合把落單前最容易忽略嘅問題放喺首位嘅買家。 家庭用戶要睇乜嘢？優先睇後排乘座、兒童座椅、行李同日常上下車係咪順手。 每日開車有無麻煩？如果能源成本、泊車方便同版本配置都符合你嘅生活節奏，佢會比較容易相處。
競爭對手比較內容
把 Audi S8 放進同級車名單時，唔建議只看品牌或外形。真正有用嘅比較順序係：先由版本定位、品牌售後同日常用途開始比較。
咁樣篩選出嚟嘅結果更貼近日常生活。你會更清楚佢係適合城市通勤、家庭代步、長途巡航，定係更適合作為講求個性嘅選擇。
用車全週期指南
擁有 Audi S8 嘅重點，係確認保險、路稅、保養同輪胎成本都喺可接受範圍內。買車唔係一次付款結束，而係每日都要相處。
如果你經常行南北大道，動力同車廂舒適度會比單純低價更重要；如果主要喺市區，泊車靈活性、視野同低速順滑度會更影響心情。
車款概覽
Mercedes-Benz EQA 值唔值買，關鍵唔係佢睇落有多吸引，而係佢係咪能夠解決你嘅真實用車需求。這篇文章會把重點放喺充電節奏、通勤半徑同使用便利。
價格落喺 RM 296,888，買家可以先用佢判斷預算壓力同同級定位。
購車價格指南
Mercedes-Benz EQA 嘅購車預算可以先從 RM 296,888 開始衡量。呢個數字真正影響嘅係月供、保險同現金流，而唔只係展銷廳入面嘅標價。
如果你喺幾個版本之間猶豫，可以把 2025 EQA 250 AMG Line（RM 296,888）放喺同一張清單入面比較。日常通勤買家優先睇舒適同安全，常跑高速嘅買家則更應重視動力、輔助駕駛同座艙便利。
核心參數匯總
睇 Mercedes-Benz EQA 嘅核心規格，最重要係把數字翻譯成生活入面嘅感覺。
140 kW 嘅輸出，令高速變線同短距離超車更有底氣。 車長 4463 mm、車寬 2020 mm、車高 1834 mm、軸距 2729 mm，可以幫你預判停車難度同後排乘坐空間。 固定齒比 變速箱、前輪驅動佈局 嘅設定，會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航感。
優缺點分析
Mercedes-Benz EQA 嘅優點唔必誇張，真正有價值嘅係佢係咪能夠令日常使用更省心：預算位置清晰，方便同同級車直接比較、動力輸出能夠支撐高速同超車需求、空間同車身尺寸便於家庭買家預判實用性。
需要留意嘅係，需要先確認屋企、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、市區停車同狹窄路段仍要看個人駕駛習慣。呢啲唔係扣分項，而係落訂前應該先諗清楚嘅生活細節。
購車常見問題解答
購買 Mercedes-Benz EQA 前，買家最常問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢係咪能夠融入自己嘅生活。
呢輛車適合邊個？適合把充電節奏、通勤半徑同使用便利放在首位嘅買家。 家庭用戶要睇啲咩？優先睇後排乘坐、兒童座椅、行李同日常上落車係咪順手。 每日開唔會麻煩？只要充電條件穩定，電動車嘅通勤體驗通常更安靜，都更容易控制日常能源成本。
競爭對手對比內容
把 Mercedes-Benz EQA 放喺同級車名單時，唔建議只睇品牌或外形。真正有用嘅比較順序係：先用 RM 296,888 鎖定預算圈、再睇動力是否足夠應付高速同滿載、最後睇空間係咪適合家人同行李。
咁樣篩選出來嘅結果更貼近日常生活。你會更清楚佢係適合城市通勤、家庭代步、長途巡航，定係更適合作為一輛講求個性嘅選擇。
用車全週期指南
擁有 Mercedes-Benz EQA 嘅關鍵，係先把充電安排諗清楚。家充、公司充電同商場快充只要其中一項穩定，日常體驗就會輕鬆好多。
如果你常跑南北大道，動力同座艙舒適度會比普通低價更重要；如果主要喺市區，停車靈活性、視野同低速順滑度會更影響心情。
車型概覽
買 Perodua Traz 值唔值得，關鍵唔係佢睇落幾吸引，而係佢夠唔夠解決你嘅真實用車需要。呢篇文章會集中放喺佢同級別車比較嘅生活適應程度。最近圍繞呢款車嘅討論包括「KLIMS 2026: Perodua Traz and the National Brand's SUV Foundation」，反映喺本地買家視野入面仍然有關注度。
價格範圍喺 RM 76,100 - 82,000，買家可以先用佢判斷預算壓力同同級定位。
購車價格指南
Perodua Traz 嘅購車預算可以先由 RM 76,100 - 82,000 開始衡量。呢個數字真正影響嘅係月供、保險同現金流，而不係只係展廳入面嘅標價。
如果你喺幾個版本之間猶豫，可以把 2026 1.5L H 2T（RM 82,000）、2026 1.5L H（RM 81,100）、2026 1.5L X（RM 76,100） 放喺同一張清單入面比較。日常通勤買家優先睇舒適同安全，常跑高速嘅買家則更應重視動力、輔助駕駛同座艙方便。
核心參數匯總
睇 Perodua Traz 嘅核心規格，最重要係將數字翻譯成生活入面嘅感受。
自然進氣、4 缸嘅動力底子，適合拿來判斷市區跟車同高速巡航是否輕鬆。106 Ps、138 N·m嘅輸出，真正意義在於滿載、爬坡同超車時唔會太吃力。4.69 L/100km嘅油耗，對於每天通勤嘅人嚟講會直接影響加油頻率。車長 4310 mm、車寬 1770 mm、車高 1655 mm、軸距 2620 mm，可以幫你預判停車難度同後排乘坐空間。
優缺點分析
Perodua Traz 嘅優點唔使誇張，真正有價值嘅係佢夠唔夠讓日常使用更加少操心：預算位置清楚，方便同級別車直接比較、日常能源成本有明確參考、動力輸出能支撐高速同超車需要。
需要留意嘅係，市區停車同狹窄路段仍然睇個人駕駛習慣。呢啲唔係扣分項，而係落訂之前應該先諗清楚嘅生活細節。
購車常見問題解答
購買 Perodua Traz 之前，買家最常問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢夠唔夠融入自己嘅生活。
呢輛車適合邊個？適合把佢同級別車相比嘅生活適應程度放喺首位嘅買家。家庭用戶要看咩？優先睇後排乘坐、兒童座椅、行李同日常上下車是否順手。每天開會唔會麻煩？4.69 L/100km嘅油耗參考讓通勤成本更加容易預估。
競爭對手比較內容
把 Perodua Traz 放進同級別車名單嘅時候，唔建議只睇品牌或外形。真正有用嘅比較順序係：先用 RM 76,100 - 82,000 鎖定預算圈、再睇動力夠唔夠應付高速同滿載、跟住比較能源成本同補能方便、最後睇空間是否適合家人同行李。
咁樣篩選出嚟嘅結果更加貼近日常生活。你會更清楚佢係適合城市通勤、家庭代步、長途巡航，定係更適合作為一輛講求個性嘅選擇。
用車全週期指南
擁有 Perodua Traz 嘅日常成本，最直接會反映喺燃油、保險、輪胎同定期保養上。4.69 L/100km嘅油耗讓通勤預算更加容易掌握。
如果你常跑南北大道，動力同座艙舒適度會比單純低價更重要；如果主要喺市區，停車靈活性、視野同低速順滑度會更加影響心情。
Nota Editor: Melihat kembali pasaran kenderaan komersial pada setengah tahun pertama 2026, “dalaman sejuk, luar panas” hanyalah permukaan, manakala “penyusunan semula perang harga kepada perang nilai” adalah intipatinya.
Pasar kenderaan komersial China pada tahun 2026, berdiri pada persimpangan yang agak canggung.
Data daripada Persatuan Industri Automotif China menunjukkan, pengeluaran dan jualan kumulatif kenderaan komersial pada setengah tahun pertama masing-masing ialah 2.272 juta unit dan 2.297 juta unit, meningkat 8.2% dan 8.3% berbanding tahun lalu — pasaran sedang menghangat, tetapi menghangat dengan sangat perlahan. Berserta itu, kabut perang harga semakin tebal: keuntungan per unit terus ditekan, transformasi tenaga baharu memerlukan pelaburan berterusan untuk penyelidikan, pembangunan serta talian pengeluaran, syarikat automotif perlu mengurangkan kos untuk terus hidup, serta melabur wang untuk transformasi, “terus hidup, kekalkan bahagian pasaran” menjadi keadaan hidup yang lazim dalam kumpulan teratas.
Di tengah bunyi “merosot” yang meriah, Kenderaan Komersial SAIC menjalankan lengkung mandiri yang membuat orang terkejut: jualan Jan-Jun meningkat 28.37% berbanding tahun lalu, kira-kira 3.4 kali ganda purata industri, ia adalah satu-satunya syarikat dalam kumpulan teratas yang serentak mencapai “skala membesar + keunggulan pertumbuhan jauh” dalam dua kelebihan. Di antaranya, SAIC Maxus sebagai tenaga teras blok, setengah tahun pertama jualan kumulatif 138,000 unit, kadar pertumbuhan kenderaan komersial mencapai 35.36%, ia adalah syarikat tunggal dalam kumpulan 10 teratas industri yang pertumbuhannya melebihi 35%.
Van ringan pertahankan asas, tenaga baharu dan eksport buka lengkung pertumbuhan kedua
Permainan stok sedia ada industri kenderaan komersial, pada asalnya adalah satu “perang pertahanan asas”. Siapa yang asasnya stabil, siapa yang transformasi ada keyakinan.
Keyakinan Kenderaan Komersial SAIC, pertama sekali datang dari van ringan.
Setengah tahun pertama, jualan kumulatif van ringan Maxus 61,000 unit, meraih juara berganda jualan bulanan dan kumulatif, pangsa pasaran jenama tunggal melepasi 27%, unggul 7,200 unit daripada nombor dua industri, lebih 10,000 unit daripada nombor tiga. Bulan Jun, jualan bulanan van ringan Maxus 13,902 unit, meningkat 62% berbanding tahun lalu; di antaranya Siri Daxin bulan Jun jualan panas 7,207 unit, melonjak 218% berbanding tahun lalu, menjadi kemasukan fenomena dalam laluan van ringan tenaga baharu.
Tetapi yang benar-benar membezakan Kenderaan Komersial SAIC dengan rakan sejawat, ialah pemanduan enjin berganda tenaga baharu dan eksport.
Sisi tenaga baharu, jualan kenderaan komersial SAIC tenaga baharu setengah tahun pertama meningkat 69% berbanding tahun lalu, kadar penembusan tenaga baharu domestik mencapai 47%, jauh melebihi paras keseluruhan industri 30.4%. Yuejin lorry ringan tenaga baharu setengah tahun pertama penjualan 12,971 unit, meningkat 65% berbanding tahun lalu; Van ringan Super Extended Range Daxin CLTC jarak perjalanan gabungan mencapai 1260 km, penggunaan tenaga seratus kilometer rendah hingga 2.65L — set data ini secara langsung menembusi “kecemasan jarak” dan “kos operasi” dua saraf yang paling sensitif pengguna komersial.
Sisi eksport, setengah tahun pertama Kenderaan Komersial SAIC eksport kumulatif 65,000 unit, meningkat 33% berbanding tahun lalu. Di Yunani, bahagian Maxus berlipat empat kali berbanding tahun lalu; di Singapura, berturut-turut tiga bulan memegang puncak pangsa pasaran; di Asia Tenggara, memperoleh secara berturut-turut pesanan besar van ringan tenaga baharu; dan menjadi jenama kenderaan komersial China pertama yang menetap dalam pasukan penghantaran DHL Jerman Pasaran Pos.
Pengerusi Jawatankuasa Pengurusan Kenderaan Komersial SAIC, Pengurus Besar SAIC Maxus Yang Huaijing dalam satu ucapan di Persidangan Pegawai SAIC Maxus 2026, tepat menjelaskan logik asas strategi ini: “Produk adalah asas teras pembangunan syarikat, malah pemegang utama realisasi lompatan nilai usahawan kali kedua. Persaingan harga industri pada akhirnya akan kembali ke nilai barang itu sendiri, produk dengan TCO kos kitaran hayat penuh lebih baik dan TVO nilai kitaran hayat penuh lebih tinggi akan lebih digemari pasaran.”
Dari “jual kereta” ke “urus pengguna”, keupayaan berstruktur bina parit perlindungan
Jika van ringan, tenaga baharu, eksport adalah “tiga laporan” Kenderaan Komersial SAIC setengah tahun pertama, maka menopang ketiga-tiga laporan ini, adalah satu set keupayaan berstruktur daripada penyelidikan teknologi sendiri hingga lokalisasi global.
Dari segi teknologi, Kenderaan Komersial SAIC tidak mengambil jalan pintas yang lazim industri “belian luar tiga tenaga”, malah bersandar pada Arkitektur Elektrik Super Komersial Hongtu 2.0, Platform Pickup Xingzhan dan platform teras penyelidikan sendiri lain, membina jalur teknologi tenaga penuh termasuk elektrik sepenuhnya, hibrid dicas, bahan api hidrogen, super extended range. Teknologi Super Extended Range Mini Xingpai yang dilancarkan pada 2026, dan Teknologi Bateri Tianxing yang dikaji bersama CATL, masing-masing menyelesaikan tiga masalah utama industri iaitu jarak, penggunaan tenaga, keselamatan. Strategi “menahan teknologi teras di tangan sendiri” ini, membolehkan Kenderaan Komersial SAIC tidak dijepit oleh pembekal dalam transformasi tenaga baharu.
Dari segi globalisasi, Kenderaan Komersial SAIC telah melengkapkan penyempurnaan daripada “keluaran produk” ke “keluaran berstruktur”. Pada masa ini, produknya meliputi lebih 100 negara dan wilayah, membina sistem rantai penuh lokalisasi jualan, perkhidmatan, pengubahsuaian di pasar utama. Yang Huaijing di Pameran Automotif Beijing apabila berdepan dengan lebih 100 negara 200 lebih pengedar luar negara menegaskan dengan jelas: “Kami bukan sahaja mengikuti langkah pasaran, malah perlu bersatu dengan semua pihak, bersama-sama mendefinisikan masa depan pergerakan global.” Dalam satu pertemuan strategik yang lain, dia lebih terang-terangan menerangkan strategi global “tidak menyerang perang harga”: “Dalam barisan Kenderaan Komersial SAIC, ramai adalah prajurit baru dalam bidang kenderaan komersial, ada juga prajurit lama, prajurit baru dan lama, baru boleh bersinkronisasi secara efisien memecah sempadan. Kami tidak akan melepaskan mana-mana bahagian, mengepalkan jari menjadi tin, lima jari lengkap mengepul ke luar baru paling berkuasa.”
Dari segi ekosistem, Kenderaan Komersial SAIC membina Aliansi Ekosistem Pengubahsuaian Global, Pusat Pengalaman Pengguna Situasi Penuh 8S, model "7 hari percubaan percuma" pickup pertama dalam industri, mengangkat hubungan "jual kereta tradisional" kepada hubungan "perkongsian kekayaan".
Melihat kembali pasaran kenderaan komersial setengah tahun pertama 2026, “dalaman sejuk, luar panas” hanyalah permukaan, manakala “penyusunan semula perang harga kepada perang nilai” adalah intipatinya. Persatuan Industri Automotif China meramalkan jualan kenderaan komersial sepanjang tahun 2026 akan mencapai 4.5 juta unit, hanya meningkat 4.7% berbanding tahun lalu — ini bermakna permainan stok sedia ada akan menjadi keadaan normal baharu, hari bergantung pada gelombang umum naik akan hilang tidak kembali.
Di bawah keadaan normal baharu ini, Kenderaan Komersial SAIC dengan kadar pertumbuhan 28.37%, lengkung pertumbuhan kira-kira 3.4 kali industri membuktikan satu perkara: pasaran stok sedia ada bukan tidak ada peluang, malah peluang hanya ditinggalkan kepada syarikat yang selesai menukar tenaga gerakan terlebih dahulu.
Once the China Passenger Car Association released the pure electric retail ranking for the first half of 2026, the industry finally saw the true temperature of the market. The top ten seats underwent a complete shake-up, with long-standing top models collectively diving. Seagull, Qin PLUS, and other former top hits fell out of the head lineup, replaced by all-new products concentrated on the market in the past year. Many people say the pure electric market is not doing well, but looking closely at the data reveals that what is not doing well are old products, low price points, and stock models without technology. Truly new products that hit users' core needs are still surging against the trend.
No.1 Geely Star Wish
Geely Star Wish, which took the pure electric sales crown for the first half of the year, has mixed feelings. The result of 194,000 units looks impressive, but actually decreased slightly by 5.3% year-on-year. Against the background of the overall contraction of the entry-level pure electric market, holding onto this volume is already considered a win. This 60,000-level A0-class small car has ranked at the top for 16 consecutive months, the core being that it solves the pain points of commuter cars to the extreme. Rear-drive architecture, independent suspension, CATL cells, and fast-charge configurations are fully loaded on all models. Using superior specifications, it beats competitors at the same price point. Cumulative sales exceeded 800,000 units in less than two years.
Conversely, the 50,000 to 100,000 market is continuing to shrink. Leapmotor and other competitors have entered with lower prices and higher configurations. Plus, car profits are thin as razor blades. Star Wish's domestic market share has basically hit the ceiling. The next incremental growth can only be supported by overseas markets.
No.2 Tesla Model Y
Tesla Model Y, ranked second, sold 172,500 units in the first half of the year, with a slight increase of 0.6% year-on-year. It barely held onto its basic market position amid the blockade of domestic models. As the industry benchmark for the 250,000 to 300,000 pure electric SUV market, Model Y's core competitiveness has never been interior configurations, but mature powertrain systems, a supercharging network spread across the country, and Tesla's brand premium. Many family users choose it for peace of mind and value retention.
However, with new products from Li Auto, Xiaomi, and AITO taking turns siphoning users, Model Y's growth has long entered stagnation. The latest news is that the high-performance version of this car has completed MIIT declaration. It will likely maintain sales with facelifts and price adjustments in the second half of the year, but it is highly probable that its overall market share will continue to be eroded.
No.3 Li Auto i6
Li Auto i6 reached third place with 120,400 units, the brightest dark horse in the first half of the year, and marked that Li Auto's pure electric transformation is fully completed.
This 250,000-level family pure electric SUV completely continues Li Auto's product logic oriented towards family users. It does not compete on paper data like 0-100 km/h acceleration, but makes 800V high-voltage platforms, dual-chamber air suspension, and advanced intelligent driving standard configurations. It maximizes space, comfort, and energy replenishment efficiency, precisely hitting the pain points of urban family users.
Since its launch, this car has had monthly sales exceeding 20,000 for four consecutive months, directly accounting for 62% of Li Auto's total sales, siphoning its own extended-range L series. However, the 200,000 to 300,000 pure electric SUV market is the most competitive track this year. New products are flocking to the market in the second half of the year. It is not easy for the i6 to maintain current sales levels. Later, it will depend on new products like the i8 to take over.
No.4 Xiaomi YU7
Xiaomi YU7, as a popular model, sold 104,600 units in the first half of the year, ranked fourth. As a brand-new car launched only half a year ago, this result has exceeded industry expectations. This mid-size SUV focusing on sports and family, relying on Xiaomi's ecosystem traffic, reached a peak of nearly 38,000 units in the first month after launch, directly breaking the market pattern at the same price level.
However, the subsequent trend can be described as opening high and closing low. After the heat subsided, sales declined month by month until June, relying on the launch of the standard version and employee internal purchase discounts to return to the ten-thousand club. Ultimately, the 200,000-level pure electric SUV track is too competitive. Tesla Model Y is above, and cost-effective brands like Leapmotor are below. YU7's product strength has not pulled an absolute gap. Next, Xiaomi's focus will shift to its extended-range series. YU7 will likely maintain steady sales, making it difficult to replicate the explosion in the early stages after launch.
No.5 BYD Yuan UP
BYD Yuan UP sold 82,700 units in pure retail sales in the first half of the year, increasing by 14.7% year-on-year, making it BYD's new backbone in the entry-level pure electric market. It gained volume because it took over from Yuan PLUS. The old Yuan PLUS saw a cliff-like drop in sales. Yuan UP used lower pricing, newer designs, and BYD's mature powertrain system to quickly fill the market gap for pure electric SUVs under 100,000.
Plus, BYD's service network spread across the country and the reputation of Blade Batteries have extremely strong attraction for mass market users. However, there is bad news: Leapmotor A10 has overtaken Yuan UP in retail volume for two consecutive months. It is advancing step by step with a cost-effective strategy of larger space and higher configurations. In the second half of the year, it will be quite difficult for Yuan UP to continue climbing. It will likely hold its current market share and maintain stable output through capacity ramp-up.
No.6 Xiaomi SU7
Xiaomi SU7 sold 80,500 units in the first half of the year, dropping 48.3% year-on-year, with the ranking falling to sixth. The main reason is that the replacement gap dragged it down. At the beginning of the year, the old SU7 was discontinued to pave the way for the new model. Two months of delivery vacuum directly lowered the total for the first half of the year. After the new generation model was launched in March, it quickly returned to a monthly sales level of 20,000+, remaining the benchmark for 200,000-level pure electric sedans.
As Xiaomi's founding work, SU7 thoroughly opened up the capacity of the niche sports car market, even siphoning users from BMW 3 Series and Tesla Model 3. However, the sports car market itself has a low ceiling. Plus, with more and more competitors, SU7's sales have basically hit the upper limit. Next, it will be more about stabilizing output as the brand's basic market. The stage of explosive growth has passed.
No.7 NIO ES8
NIO ES8 accumulated 78,600 units in retail sales for the first half of the year, ranking seventh, being the absolute sales king in the high-end market above 400,000. The fully new ES8 can fight, the core is hitting the pure electric replacement demand of high-end family users. The swapping system solves energy replenishment anxiety. Luxury and service experience crush same-price BBA fuel cars. Users accounting for more than 97% are exchange/purchase users, of which 60% come from BBA owners.
Less than a year after launch, the new ES8 cumulative delivery broke 120,000 units, ranking the large SUV sales champion for six consecutive months, hard撑着 (proping up) the market capacity of the high-end pure electric market. Next, its own lower-positioned ES9 has already siphoned many users after launch. The 6-seater version has just started reservations. Plus, the high-end market itself has limited capacity. ES8's main goal for the second half of the year is to hold onto the basic market of the high-end market.
No.8 Wuling Hongguang MINI
Once the national god car Hongguang MINI EV sold only 72,800 units in the first half of the year, dropping 57.4% year-on-year, falling directly from the top spot to eighth. It is known as the most tragic fall among old models.
The loss of speed of Hongguang MINI is not caused by a single reason. On one hand, the A00-class microcar market is contracting overall. Adjustment of purchase tax policy has significantly shrunk the cost-performance advantage of low-price cars. On the other hand, user consumption upgrades are obvious. Adding 20,000 can buy a small car with larger space, higher configuration, and longer range. Many users who watched MINI EV finally bought Bingo, Star Wish. Wuling itself is clear about the problem. The fifth-generation model changed to a four-door structure, added fast charging and safety configurations, but it still could not stop the downward trend.
No.9 Changan Qiyuan Q05
Changan Qiyuan Q05 sold 71,600 units in the first half of the year, breaking into ninth, a true comeback dark horse.
This car had little presence last year. After price reduction and configuration increase in April this year, it took off directly. It pulled the entry-level range to 506km, even downgraded laser radar to the 80,000 level. Using a "technology equity" strategy, it precisely hit the pain points of home users. It sat firmly as the pure electric compact SUV sales champion for three consecutive months. Changan's capacity also kept up with the rhythm. After the Nanchang factory was put into production, bottlenecks were gradually relieved. The overseas market also bloomed synchronously. Thailand launched in half a month, and orders broke 3,000. After capacity is fully released in the second half of the year, Qiyuan Q05 sales still have rising space. It is expected to冲击 (attack/strive for) the first echelon of entry-level pure electric.
No.10 MG4
Ranked tenth, MG4 sold 70,800 units in pure retail sales in the first half of the year, purely relying on overseas market endorsement. This 100,000-level pure electric hatchback has been selling well in Europe for several years. It has ranked as the China-brand European sales champion for 11 consecutive years. Overseas sales share far exceeds domestic.
In the domestic market, MG4 began to gain volume gradually after its refresh last year. Rear-drive architecture and five-link independent suspension chassis quality are unique at the same price level. The MG4X version launched this year even downgraded semi-solid-state batteries. The technology普惠 (universal benefit) strategy was very effective. Domestic monthly sales have exceeded 10,000 for 9 consecutive months. However, hatchbacks themselves are a niche market in China. MG's brand voice is far less than mainstream autonomous brands. There will be no big breakthroughs domestically. Next, its incremental growth will still come from overseas. Maintaining steady state domestically is sufficient. It is a model that relies on the global market to amortize costs.
Summary
After reading the top ten ranking, you can see that the pure electric market has long passed the barbaric growth period where any car can be sold by just building it. The logic now is very clear. The low-end market is continuously shrinking. Consumption upgrading is the big trend. Old products that do not iterate quickly will be eliminated quickly. New products that truly hit user needs, have proper configurations, and reasonable prices can still break through against the trend even in an environment where the overall market is declining. Competition in the second half of the year will only be more intense. More new products will be concentrated on the market. The price war will continue. Looking at the ranking by the end of the year, the rankings may have to change one more time.
新能源市場嘅牌桌上，一個曾被普遍質疑嘅品牌，而家就打出一手意外嘅好牌。
2026 年 7 月，深藍汽車交出咗一份亮眼嘅半年成績單：1-6 月全球累計銷量 16.4 萬輛，同比上升 14.6%。其中，6 月單月銷量 3.36 萬輛，連續四個月突破 3 萬輛。海外市場上半年累計出口 3.58 萬輛，同比上升 141%。
然而，就喺幾個月前，深藍仲唔係呢番光景。
2026 年一季度，深藍銷量同比下降超過 17%，1 月交付環比下降，2 月甚至未直接公佈全係銷量。2025 年全年銷量定格喺 33.31 萬輛，雖完成咗調降後嘅目標，但係建立喺年度目標從最初嘅 50 萬輛主動調降喺 36 萬輛嘅基礎之上——呢係深藍連續第三年未能完成最初設定嘅年度目標。
比銷量更棘手嘅係盈利困境：截至 2025 年 10 月末，深藍累計虧損高達 135.3 億元，資產負債率達 114.3%，連續多年資不抵債。嗰時，深藍被外界視為新能源「內捲」中最有可能倒落嚟嘅品牌之一。
只不過，從被唱衰到連續月銷破 3 萬，深藍靠乜完成今次「逆襲」？
最直接嘅答案藏喺產品結構入面。深藍 S05、L06、S07 三款主力車型構建咗一個穩固嘅「銷量三角」，而唔係依賴單一爆款。深藍 S05 係絕對嘅「銷量擔當」——6 月全球銷量 1.84 萬輛，同比上升 78.86%，累計銷量已超 24 萬輛。深藍 L06 則上演咗「V 型反轉」，從 1 月僅 1,656 輛嘅低谷，到 6 月攀升至 7,977 輛，連續 4 個月超 5,000 輛，拿下 13—20 萬元新能源中型車季度銷量冠軍。深藍 S07 穩紮穩打，6 月銷量 6,994 輛。
但產品結構嘅成型只係表象，真正支撐呢套矩陣跑開嚟嘅，係深藍喺技術普惠上嘅一條清晰邏輯，佢嘅官方總結為，「唔卷價，卷技術，將高科技普及到更合適嘅價位區間。」如 L06 嘅磁流變懸架同激光雷達、S05 嘅 3C 超充同全係標配 L2+ 智駕、S07 嘅華為乾崑智駕方案。呢啲技術單獨拎出嚟都唔算新鮮，但集中出現喺 15 萬級嘅車型上，喺同樣價位幾乎搵唔到第二個。
值得一提嘅係，呢背後唔係靠「蝕本」硬撐，而係一套被驗證過嘅供應鏈邏輯：深藍用規模換成本、用成本換配置、用配置換銷量——然後銷量再反哺規模，形成一個正向循環。
此外，海外市場嘅爆發，則提供咗另一種增長邏輯。國內新能源市場增速已降喺個位數，存量化特徵越來越明顯，呢個意思係每一輛增量都必然來自競爭對手嘅份額。基於此，深藍將戰場外延，佢上半年海外銷量 3.58 萬輛、同比上升 141%，業務覆蓋全球 100 多個國家同地區，泰國工廠同五個 KD 車間已投入營運。海外唔單止係銷量補充，更係一種風險對沖：當國內價格戰打到極致，海外市場嘅毛利空間同品牌溢價能力，為深藍提供咗更大嘅回旋餘地。
但銷量數字嘅光環之下，一些更深層嘅追問同樣無法回避。
首先，係盈利。截至 2025 年 10 月末，深藍累計虧損 135.3 億元，資產負債率 114.3%——賣一輛虧一輛嘅局面雖然正在收窄，但距離真正嘅自我造血仲有距離。連續四個月站上 3 萬輛只係觸及咗盈虧平衡嘅「門檻」，跨過呢道門檻需要嘅係持續穩定嘅規模輸出，而唔係幾個月嘅衝量。
其次，係護城河。深藍而家嘅競爭優勢，係用供應鏈整合把高端配置下放喺 15 萬級，其本質係一種「效率優勢」，而唔係「技術代差」。效率優勢可以被模仿，被追趕，甚至被超越。當競爭對手同樣把激光雷達、磁流變懸架做到呢個價位時，深藍嘅下一個差異化武器係咩？
此外，仲有海外市場嘅不確定性。3.58 萬輛嘅半年出口只係一個開始。海外增長依賴本地化產能、渠道網絡同品牌認知嘅持續投入，任何一個環節嘅延誤都可能改變增長曲線嘅斜率。同時，海外市場嘅政策風險、本地對手嘅反擊、品牌認知嘅漫長積累，都係深藍必須面對嘅變數。
半年前，深藍仲被質疑點樣先活落嚟；半年後，佢用 16.4 萬輛嘅成績畀出咗答案。但呢個答案只係階段性嘅。盈利嘅兌現、技術壁壘嘅厚度、海外擴張嘅變數——呢三道考題，深藍都仲未最終交卷。
而這，也恰恰係新能源行業下半場嘅核心考題：上半場，拼嘅係點樣先可以將車造出嚟，賣出嚟；下半場，拼嘅則係點樣可以持續盈利，點樣可以建立品牌，點樣可以喺全球市場上站穩腳跟。而家，深藍嘅上半場答卷唔錯，而下半場嘅序幕，才剛剛拉開。
On July 16, Geely Galaxy released the world's first "Thunder 16-in-1 Intelligent Electric Drive" (hereinafter referred to as Thunder 16-in-1) at Xingqu Technology's Wuxi base, and will equip it first on Geely Galaxy TT. At the launch event, this electric drive system won two Guinness World Records. Galaxy TT completed the lowest energy consumption challenge for a mass-produced pure electric sedan around Qinghai Lake, with a measured power consumption of 8.20kWh/100km; simultaneously completed the longest continuous dual-car drifting challenge on a slippery road surface, with a continuous drifting distance exceeding 46 km, breaking the record held by Porsche in 2020.
But if you zoom the camera back a bit, you will find that the true protagonist of this launch event was not actually the Thunder 16-in-1, but the partner behind this system, Xingqu Technology. It is the "ace card" of electric drive technology, according to Li Chuanhai, Vice President of Geely Automobile Group and Dean of Geely Automobile Research Institute.
This is the first time Xingqu Technology has stepped into the spotlight as an independent identity. In the previous few years, it existed more as a behind-the-scenes supplier, assisting customers in achieving multiple industry premieres. In addition to Geely, Xingqu Technology is also a partner behind a long list of globally recognized automakers such as Renault, Jaguar Land Rover, Vinfast, HORSE, and Tier 1.
01.
Who is Xingqu Technology
Xingqu Technology, English name InfiMotion, Infi comes from Infinite, Motion means power, implying "providing infinite power for the future". It is an independently operated global electric drive system supplier, whose products and technology services cover brands such as Geely, Zeekr, Lynk & Co, Volvo, smart, Polestar, Proton, as well as international automakers such as Jaguar Land Rover and Renault, and has established deep cooperation with international top-tier Tier 1 suppliers such as ZF and Magna Powertrain.
Geely Galaxy is a representative of its many customers.
Its technical resume is not short.
In 2021, Xingqu Technology pioneered the first 400V SiC electric drive solution in China on the Zeekr 001, which remains a classic benchmark for electric drive efficiency and performance to date;
In 2024, Xingqu Technology mass-produced the world's first 11-in-1 domain control electric drive, equipped on Geely Galaxy E5, it is the pioneer of the super-integrated electric drive route, and the first-equipped vehicle has also become the sales champion for exports of China's A-segment pure electric SUV;
In 2025, Xingqu Technology first applied magnesium alloy housing technology to the distributed electric drive system, and then immediately mass-produced the world's first 900V high-performance magnesium alloy coaxial dual electric drive.
Today, Xingqu Technology's revenue has grown from 40 million yuan in its first year to over 20 billion yuan this year. There are nearly 1,000 R&D engineers, with the Sweden team exceeding 100 people. The R&D and manufacturing network spans Wuxi, Shanghai, Hangzhou, Ningbo, Jiaxing, Quzhou in China, as well as Sweden and Malaysia, covering Eurasia and serving the global market.
Therefore, the Thunder 16-in-1 was able to win two Guinness World Records as soon as it was launched. Relying on it behind the scenes is not luck in a single instance, but the result of years of technical accumulation by Geely and Xingqu Technology.
02.
The advantages of Thunder 16-in-1 are not limited to ultra-high integration
The voltage platform of Thunder 16-in-1 is 800V, peak power is 245kW, and peak torque is 320Nm.
Its "16" refers to 16 functions and components deeply integrated into one system: motor, motor controller, reducer, DCDC, OBC, PDU, HBMS, LBMS, VCU, TMS, active pre-charge control, powertrain gateway, as well as intelligent energy management, intelligent energy replenishment management, intelligent motion control, and intelligent health management.
After integration, high-voltage harnesses are reduced by 30%, low-voltage harnesses are reduced by 15%. Combined with magnesium alloy housing, the whole unit is reduced by 20kg, weighing only 75kg; Z-dimension size is less than 325mm, 8% lower than industry mainstream multi-in-one products.
There is a natural contradiction in multi-in-one systems: the more components integrated, the easier efficiency losses are to accumulate. Thunder 16-in-1's CLTC comprehensive efficiency reached 93.8%, number one in its class, already close to the level of a three-in-one electric drive. Behind it are two methodologies called "Joule Engineering" and "Mirror Engineering", deeply integrating technical points such as 800V high-voltage platform, SiC power modules, Umini-Pin flat wire windings, ultra-thin silicon steel sheets, gear honing, low-viscosity lubricating oil, and active lubrication technology into a system-level solution.
Beyond performance, what is more worth noting is the reconstruction of the control chain. In traditional electric drives, control algorithms are distributed in different chips, and signals have to be "transferred across departments", with an average response latency of 40 milliseconds. Thunder 16-in-1 adopts a single-chip integrated architecture, compressing this chain to the fastest 2 milliseconds. Ren Xiangfei, Chief Engineering Technology Scientist of Geely Automobile Group, gave an analogy at the launch event: the difference of these two milliseconds is like Messi, who is 39 years old, still leading the team to turn the tables in adversity, relying on a reaction that is naturally one beat faster than others, and the gap between top-tier and ordinary often lies between this beat. Combined with AI deviation predictive control, real-time torque deviation was reduced from 3% to 1%, and this control capability was finally verified in the extreme scenario of 46 km continuous dual-car drifting.
Continuous output capability relies on thermal management as a safety net. Thunder 16-in-1 adopted 54-way directional cooling technology for the first time. 54 nozzles precisely cover the winding ends and rotor cores, reducing the maximum motor temperature by 15°C and increasing insulation life by 10%.
In terms of reliability, 16-in-1 reduced over 180 components at the design stage, lowering failure points structurally. This system ultimately passed over 9,000 test items, and vehicle-level road durability verification cumulative exceeded 5 million km, and much of these tests and verification work were completed by Xingqu Technology's test system.
03.
Assisting customers in multiple premieres, where does Xingqu Technology really excel
In fact, to turn an advanced electric drive system into a product that can be mass-produced stably and withstand 9,000 tests, there is still a long way to go in between.
This road is hard to walk, but it is exactly where Xingqu Technology's core competitiveness lies.
Xingqu Technology CEO Lin Xiaozhe summarized the company's capabilities into three core strengths: technology, quality, and globalization. The first two determine whether Xingqu Technology can precisely manufacture the system; the third determines whether Xingqu Technology can gain global customer recognition.
Technical strength can be intuitively shown from the rigor of "1 mm".
The efficiency of multi-in-one electric drives can be affected by various factors, one of which is the flat wire windings in the motor stator. The parts sticking out at both ends of the winding are called "end turns". This part of the copper wire does not participate in work, but it is always consuming electricity and occupying space. Starting from first principles, Xingqu Technology's logic is simple: since it doesn't do work, it must be compressed to the extreme.
Saying this is light, but doing it is hard.
From a coil of copper wire to a set of flat wire windings, it goes through multiple processes such as straightening, enamel removal, 2D and 3D forming, wire insertion, twisting, expanding, and welding. During this process, if the enamel breaks it will short circuit, if the twisting angle is off the copper wires will interfere with each other, if the weld strength is not enough or there is missed welding, the entire stator will be scrapped. Xingqu Technology's R&D and process teams, in order to reduce the end height by 1 mm, need to repeatedly optimize every process parameter. Every set of matching new tooling fixtures needs to spend several months adjusting.
In 2022, the end height of Xingqu Technology's first-generation U-Pin motor was 8~10 mm; this year, the 4 mm height Umini-P product has gone into production; the next generation 3 mm U-MiniP evo is also on the way (2027). And the current industry average level is still around 5 mm.
The Thunder 16-in-1 used in this event is using this Umini-Pin process. The end height is reduced by 4 mm, and the total length of copper wire per motor is shortened by about 1,296 mm, and copper loss is reduced by over 2%. This is not a technology temporarily overcome by this product, but experience accumulated by Xingqu Technology with a monthly shipment volume exceeding 100,000 units.
This rigor is also reflected in materials and NVH. Xingqu Technology is the first enterprise in the industry to mass-produce 900V magnesium alloy dual electric drives. The magnesium alloy housing reduces weight by over 30% compared to traditional aluminum alloys, and Thunder 16-in-1 is already the fourth product to mass-produce and apply this technology. At the same time, Xingqu Technology is also exploring the application space of amorphous materials to further improve motor efficiency.
In terms of NVH, Xingqu Technology treats it as a "sensory engineering" to overcome — electromagnetic harmonic optimization, gear micro-modification, housing modal analysis and structural frequency avoidance, compressing vehicle cabin noise to below 25 decibels, and also introducing AI large models to analyze massive data to improve noise performance from the source.
Quality strength is reflected in generous investment in test benches.
In 2024, Xingqu Technology commissioned the world's first 30,000 rpm motor direct drive test bench. Before this, the highest speed of global motor test benches was 25,000 rpm. Exceeding this number, the bench would be pushed into the blank area after the limit. Xingqu Technology and the bench supplier team fought for several months to solve this problem, and now this equipment has been running stably for over 10,000 hours.
At the same time, Xingqu Technology is also the fourth electric drive enterprise in China to have assembly-level (motor + controller) EMC testing capabilities, with the entire EMC lab investment exceeding 10 million.
Beyond single-item capabilities, what best reflects Xingqu Technology's emphasis on quality is its set of complete validation systems.
Xingqu Technology test center obtained CNAS national certification, able to cover 100% of electric drive test requirements. Every electric drive development process must go through temperature field tests from -60°C to 140°C, 660,000 peak torque cycles, and over 2,500 hours of comprehensive durability tests. Durability tests start at 300,000 km, reaching up to 800,000 km. To meet the global market, they also have to go through over 1,500 hours of salt spray durability tests.
Not only that, Xingqu Technology has also built an AI test data platform, precipitating 300,000 hours of historical data, using failure prediction models to identify potential risks in advance.
Xingqu Technology has finally implemented this system to the manufacturing end.
Xingqu Technology has deployed five major intelligent manufacturing bases in China, with electric drive total annual capacity of 3 million units. The production line's highest automation rate exceeds 95%, placement machine accuracy is ±25 microns, measurement equipment accuracy is 0.1 microns, which is equivalent to 1% of a cell size. The production line also sets up 106 error-proofing processes, using a 20 million pixel AI visual inspection system to identify subtle defects, with a minimum recognition accuracy of 20 microns. Every part has a digital identity upon entering the site, and process parameters, operators, and quality data are traceable throughout.
The electric drive industry, when it comes to the later stage, is not about single-point technology, but about system capability. Single-point technology can make prototypes, only system capability can ensure stable mass production. Xingqu Technology has repeatedly won industry premieres, relying precisely on this complete closed loop from technology to manufacturing.
04.
Xingqu Technology's global path: an "unconventional" choice
Where Xingqu Technology is more worth expanding is its globalization path.
Many parts companies' logic of going global is to first run scale domestically, and then push mature products to overseas markets. Xingqu Technology chose another approach: putting global R&D, global validation, global processes, and global customer coordination in advance.
Lin Xiaozhe said very directly: the electric drive industry has no option of "domestic first, then global". Different regions have huge differences in environmental conditions, and these diverse global demands will push the product to different boundaries. Whether a system can enter the global automaker supply chain depends not only on performance parameters, but also on software processes, functional safety, validation standards, manufacturing consistency, and response speed.
Lin Xiaozhe cited a European customer case. Xingqu Technology received an order from a European luxury brand customer this year. The other party put forward over 9,000 test indicators, one of which required a large SUV to reach 107% climbing ability, converted to a gradient of about 47 degrees. This has almost never appeared in China.
This indicator is harsh because ordinary family sedans usually have a climbing ability of 15 to 20 degrees, professional off-road vehicles are at 30 to 40 degrees, and vehicles that can reach 45 degrees are already rare. More difficultly, customers require the vehicle to not only climb up, but also be able to stop on a 45-degree slope and start again.
This tests not a single motor power. When the vehicle starts under near-limit slopes, the lubrication system needs to cover all conditions, high-performance motors continuously output high torque, and the motor control system must also adjust wheel-end torque distribution at microsecond level speed, making the vehicle stable, climbable, and non-slip.
This case can explain a characteristic of Xingqu Technology going global. Overseas customers do not just look at electric drive parameter tables, but use real-world scenarios and extreme conditions to test suppliers. Whether entering a European luxury brand project depends on whether motors, motor controllers, lubrication, thermal management, software control, and verification systems can pass together.
In terms of overseas layout, Xingqu Technology has established an R&D and after-sales service center in Gothenburg, Sweden, with full industry chain design, development, and manufacturing capabilities from key components to assembly system levels. Another difficulty of globalization is collaborative development. For this, Xingqu Technology has built a cloud-based collaborative development platform called "World Tree", allowing China and Europe teams to complete software, hardware, and algorithm collaborative development in the same system. This name is taken from the tree in Nordic mythology that connects nine worlds. Xingqu Technology develops according to ASPICE Level 3 processes, following ASIL D highest functional safety level.
For overseas customers, these process capabilities are often more critical than individual performance indicators. It determines whether a supplier can enter project early development, participate in vehicle definition, and bear long-term iteration responsibility.
Changes can also be seen on the customer side. Xingqu Technology has signed nearly 30 billion yuan orders with top European automakers such as UK, France, Germany, and Tier 1. 2026 export growth is expected to exceed 100%.
This shows that Xingqu Technology's global expansion output is not a single electric drive product, but a complete engineering capability from R&D, testing, manufacturing to customer coordination.
This path has barriers and also value. The domestic new energy market has pushed the electric drive to a stage of high efficiency, high integration, and high cost-performance. Overseas markets will continue to filter suppliers using regulations, roads, climate, customer processes, and reliability standards. Xingqu Technology entering the global system in advance is equivalent to putting itself in a stricter evaluation environment. In the short term, this will increase development difficulty; in the long term, it will raise the enterprise's capability ceiling.
Summary.
This launch of Thunder 16-in-1, on the surface, is a Geely electric drive new product launch, but if placed on a longer timeline, it seems more like a centralized display of Xingqu Technology's phased capabilities.
From 400V SiC, to 11-in-1 domain control electric drive, to 900V magnesium alloy coaxial dual electric drive and Thunder 16-in-1, Xingqu Technology has formed a continuous technical promotion rhythm. This behind-the-scenes cannot be separated from the support of R&D teams, test benches, intelligent manufacturing bases, global customers, and complete process systems.
In addition, those detail capabilities usually ignored are also equally important. Tooling adjusted for months for 1 mm, test benches running stably for over 10,000 hours of 30,000 rpm, verification systems behind over 9,000 tests, and also the persistence of "leaving problems in the laboratory" which sounds simple but is hard to do.
Thunder 16-in-1 is certainly the protagonist product of this launch, but what it truly points to is the capability upgrade of Xingqu Technology as an independent electric drive supplier. Electric drives are moving from behind the scenes to the spotlight, and Xingqu Technology is gradually becoming an independent brand remembered by the industry, changing from an invisible supplier supplying multiple car companies. And this launch is just the first one fully told among its many global customer cooperation cases.
When new energy vehicle competition enters the system capability stage, whether a car company can continuously launch high-efficiency, high-performance, and high-reliability products can no longer be seen just from vehicle definition, but also whether it has powerful partners behind it, handling electric drive technology platforms, manufacturing systems, and global delivery capabilities.
Xingqu Technology is exactly such a partner being chosen by more car companies simultaneously.
Di pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli membuat perbandingan antara Proton X50 dan Honda HR-V semasa memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kenderaan ini mempunyai harga dan kedudukan yang hampir sama. Hari ini, kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat penyelidikan.
Harga OTR Proton X50 di Malaysia ialah RM 89,800 - 113,300, terdapat 4 varian, termasuk 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Honda HR-V di Malaysia ialah RM 115,900 - 143,900, terdapat 4 varian, termasuk 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X50 memang lebih murah RM 26,100 berbanding Honda HR-V. Jika bajet anda terhad, versi permulaan Proton sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Tetapi perlu diingatkan, beberapa ribu ringgit yang lebih murah itu mungkin ada pertimbangan dalam kelengkapan, bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Penilaian keselamatan Proton X50 ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Penilaian keselamatan Honda HR-V ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Penilaian keselamatan kedua-dua kereta ini adalah sama, kelengkapan keselamatan dalam kelas ini adalah sangat lengkap. Keselamatan kereta baharu sekarang adalah tidak buruk, tidak perlu bimbang mengenai perkara ini.
Panjang badan Proton X50 4400 mm, bagasi 400 L.
Panjang badan Honda HR-V 4500 mm, bagasi 450 L.
Dari segi ruang, badan Honda HR-V lebih panjang 100 mm daripada Proton X50, ruang duduk lebih menguntungkan. Namun, Proton X50 lebih fleksibel untuk parkir di bandar, setiap satu ada pertimbangan.
Proton X50 dan Honda HR-V kedua-duanya adalah pilihan utama pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga, perjalanan harian. Jika anda lebih menghargai reputasi jenama dan harga jual semula, anda boleh memberi keutamaan pada model dengan reputasi yang lebih baik; jika anda lebih memberi tumpuan kepada nisbah harga-kuasa dan kelengkapan, pilih yang mempunyai konfigurasi lebih kaya. Akhir sekali, disarankan untuk memandu kedua-dua model untuk uji bawa, pengalaman langsung adalah yang paling penting.
Secara keseluruhan, Proton X50 dan Honda HR-V adalah model kereta yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih mana satu, penentu utamanya adalah keperluan peribadi dan bajet anda. Disarankan membuat penyelidikan, membandingkan beberapa harga dari showroom kereta, kemudian pergi ujian untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, mengambil sedikit masa untuk membuat penyelidikan pasti tidak akan salah.
© 2024 Bitauto.com. All Rights Reserved.
Bitauto (www.yiche.com and www.bitauto.com) is one of the most visited automotive websites in China. We provide detailed info on Chinese car brands available in your area. Please note that the information provided on this website is based on publicly available data and is for reference only. It may not be fully updated or accurate at all times.
Help us improve our website
