HomeToyota Innova
Search History
Popular Searches
Dealer Login / Sign Up
Pasaran kereta China 2026, ada satu perkataan yang sedang berulang kali disebut — "kereta terburu-buru".
"Ayam terburu-buru 180 hari boleh dimakan, kereta terburu-buru tak berani dikemudi." Istilah internet viral di platform sosial ini, menunjuk kepada realiti yang sedang ditinjau semula oleh industri: apabila kitaran pembuatan kereta berubah dari "tahun" menjadi "bulan", pengguna tanpa sedar menjadi "penguji kereta" syarikat automotif.
Di Forum Kereta China 2026, Pengurus Besar Beijing Hyundai, Li Fenggang, secara terbuka mengkritik beberapa jenama yang memotong langkah ujian perlu untuk mempercepatkan kadar pelancaran; Jawatankuasa Teknikal Standardisasi Automotif Negara segera mengeluarkan draf pandangan umum, berniat untuk meningkatkan secara seragam jumlah kilometer ujian kebolehpercayaan model kenderaan baharu tidak kurang daripada 30,000 kilometer; Kementerian Perindustrian dan Teknologi Maklumat menjalankan pemeriksaan dan pengawasan keupayaan jaminan keselamatan produk terhadap 5 syarikat automotif dalam masa seminggu. Keseluruhan industri sedang membayar harga untuk "kelajuan". Pada 2025, terdapat 105 kali seruan semula kenderaan baharu elektrik di dalam negara, melibatkan 2.652 juta unit; seruan semula akibat kecacatan bateri kuasa melebihi 2 juta unit; bilangan aduan pertikaian pengulangan model lama dan baharu melebihi 39,000 kes, meningkat hampir 82 kali ganda berbanding 2024. Di sebalik nombor-nombor ini, terdapat kisah sebenar pelbagai keluarga yang membayar untuk "terburu-buru".
Dan tepat pada masa yang sensitif ini, Chery melancarkan sebuah kereta — Angin dan Awan T7. Dalam era kereta terburu-buru yang bertebaran di mana-mana, Angin dan Awan T7 amat perlahan: dua tahun perancangan, tiga tahun penyelidikan dan pembangunan, sepanjang proses telah dikilatkan selama hampir lima tahun. Apabila industri umum memampatkan kitaran penyelidikan dan pembangunan dari 36 bulan kepada 18 bulan, malah 12 bulan, Li Xueyong, Naib Presiden Eksekutif Chery Automobile menyatakan dengan terang-terangan: "Chery membuat kereta perlahan — perkataan ini kami telah mendengar banyak, dan kami akui. Terutamanya dalam keadaan hari ini, Angin dan Awan T7 memang 'tidak sesuai dengan kumpulan'."
Namun, di sebalik "ketidaksesuaian dengan kumpulan" ini, terdapat satu laluan yang bertentangan sepenuhnya dengan kereta terburu-buru — perlahan dalam penyelidikan dan pembangunan, perlahan dalam reka bentuk, perlahan dalam pengesahan, perlahan dalam menerima ujian piawaian global.
Berapa lamakah masa yang diperlukan untuk membuat sebuah kereta? Jawapan masa lalu ialah 3 hingga 5 tahun, kini banyak jenama telah memampatkan kepada sekitar 18 bulan, malah sebahagian projek diproduksikan dalam masa setengah tahun. Angin dan Awan T7 pula mengambil masa penuh 5 tahun. Ia bukan model khas untuk pasaran dalam negara, model asal antarabangsa yang sama telah terlebih dahulu membuka pra-penjualan di Afrika Selatan, dilancarkan di Thailand, dan seterusnya akan mendarat di Kesatuan Eropah, Australia dan New Zealand, United Kingdom, Israel, Malaysia dan 130 buah negara serta wilayah lain. Menerima ujian pasaran global dahulu, kemudian dilancarkan di pasaran dalam negeri — "ritual input songsang" dalam produk ini tidak lazim dalam syarikat automotif tempatan. Sokongan bagi ritma ini adalah rangkaian inovasi bersinergi global "1+7+N" yang telah dipupuk oleh Chery selama lebih 20 tahun — 8 pusat penyelidikan dan pembangunan global, 100+ universiti utama dunia menyertai, meliputi China, Frankfurt Jerman, Barcelona Sepanyol, São Paulo Brazil dan lain-lain hab inovasi. Penyelidikan dan pembangunan Angin dan Awan T7 bukan mengunci pintu dan melukis PPT, 8 pusat reka bentuk dan pembangunan global bekerjasama, ratusan pereka antarabangsa bersatu, pada mulanya selaras dengan regulasi, keadaan jalan dan keperluan pengguna di pelbagai wilayah global.
Satu ciri tipikal kereta terburu-buru ialah membuat kereta dengan tertutup — jurutera melukis pelan, bekalan rantai mengumpul bahagian, selepas dilancarkan biarkan pengguna "mencuba" dan maklumkan masalah. Angin dan Awan T7 memilih laluan yang bertentangan sepenuhnya. Selama 2 tahun tempoh perancangan, Chery menyelesaikan penyelidikan pengguna global 5,000+, lawatan mendalam di 15 negara tipikal, 1,000+ pengguna global berkongsi secara langsung, memasukkan keperluan pelbagai pasaran, budaya, dan kebiasaan penggunaan kereta yang berbeza ke dalam reka bentuk pada fasa definisi produk. Butiran menjelaskan masalah paling jelas: Angin dan Awan T7 menyediakan tetingkap panorama yang boleh dibuka, bukannya bumbung kaca tetap yang digunakan oleh banyak kereta elektrik untuk mengejar bentuk; ruang bagasi menyediakan 4 titik anchor, setiap titik anchor boleh menahan tarikan yang tinggi. Bahagian dalam menggunakan reka bentuk kabin peluk sayap awan, bahan dalaman mesra alam tahap Kesatuan Eropah mencipta kabin tahap ibu dan bayi, semua kulit dalaman, getah penyekat, komponen plastik tidak mudah keras atau pudar, cat kereta dibangunkan mengikut piawaian tahan cuaca luar negara, tidak pudar walaupun terdedah matahari sepanjang tahun. Suara 5,000 pengguna, sentuhan 100+ pereka, 5 tahun digilap berulang kali — ini bukan membuat kereta, ini ukiran.
Tempat paling berbahaya kereta terburu-buru ialah membuat pengurangan pada piawaian — memotong ujian ketahanan haba tinggi dan sejuk beku, melompati sebahagian ujian pelanggaran, menggantikan ujian jalan kereta sebenar dengan data simulasi. Langkah yang dijimatkan ini tidak akan hilang, hanya akan "mendatangi" dalam bentuk kerosakan, aduan atau panggilan semula selepas penghantaran pukal. Yang dilakukan oleh Angin dan Awan T7 ialah penambahan: seluruh kenderaan dibangunkan mengikut piawaian keselamatan 5 bintang versi 2026 E-NCAP, ini adalah antara sistem penilaian keselamatan paling ketat di dunia saat ini, keselamatan fungsi mencapai tahap tertinggi ASIL-D. Kereta menggunakan 80% keluli kekuatan tinggi + 18.84% keluli bentuk haba, struktur badan kanta sembilan melintang lima membujur, seluruh kereta dilengkapi maksimum 9 beg udara dalam kelasnya. Bateri Rhinoceros 6D Perisai Kunci 31 lapisan perlindungan, IP68 kalis air mencapai 96 kali piawaian negara. Awal meluluskan pengesahan standard negara baharu versi 2026, 10 daripada 24 ujian wajib melebihi keperluan standard, 52 projek pengesahan semua skenario, 28 projek lebih daripada standard negara. Orang lain membuat pengurangan pada piawaian, Angin dan Awan T7 membuat pendaraban pada piawaian.
Pengesahan, ialah langkah yang paling mudah dijimatkan dalam kereta terburu-buru. Era kereta minyak, sebuah kereta baharu dari penyelidikan hingga pelancaran perlu melalui ujian ekstrem semua skenario seperti sejuk beku, haba tinggi, dataran tinggi, pelanggaran, ketahanan, kini sesetengah jenama menggunakan teknologi simulasi "melonjak" langkah ini. Pengesahan Angin dan Awan T7 mungkin paling "mewah" dalam kelas yang sama: 81 buah kereta khusus ketahanan ujian jalan secara serentak, jumlah jarak ujian seluruh kenderaan melebihi 6 juta kilometer, ujian ketahanan khusus mencapai 1.45 juta kilometer, 963 buah kereta ujian ke seluruh dunia, meliputi lebih 100 persekitaran keadaan jalan ekstrem. Gurun Timur Tengah 55℃ panas melampau, Utara Eropah sejuk beku -40℃, kawasan tropika banyak hujan kalis air darat 500mm, ujian防腐 (corrosion) garam tinggi di kawasan pesisir, serta lubang pengecas tinggi Brazil, jalan batu kerikil Mexico, lekuan kelajuan tinggi Jerman, jalan lumpur tidak berturap Afrika Selatan — meliputi 95% jenis jalan global. Chassis diselia secara mendalam oleh pasukan Eropah yang diketuai oleh jurutera chassis senior Maserati, suspensi berasingan McPherson depan dan multi-link belakang dengan nisbah berat gandar emas 50.8:49.2, ini bukan "kaedah ambil saja" mudah, tetapi hasil pembangunan serentak oleh pasukan Eropah dan Pusat Penyelidikan Global Chery.
Kereta terburu-buru sedang dihentikan. Apabila industri secara kolektif "berbelok ke kiri" mengejar kelajuan, Chery memilih "menghela ke kanan" — bergantung pada akumulasi selama 23 tahun berturut-turut menjadi eksport pertama kereta penumpang jenama China, pengesahan 20 juta pengguna global, rangkaian pasaran meliputi lebih 130 negara dan wilayah, serta sokongan pembekal kelas dunia seperti Bosch, Valeo, United Automotive Electronics, Sony, Autoliv, dll, Angin dan Awan T7 menjadikan sebuah SUV elektrik sepenuhnya rumah tangga kelas 100,000 mencapai piawaian global. Satu rangkaian 600 kilometer julat tidak memulakan premium mengikut tahap, bateri Rhinoceros 15 tahun tidak perlu ditukar, maksimum 9 beg udara dalam kelas sama menjadi piawai rangkaian, cip 8775 + Falcon 500 kabin pengendalian pintar satu kes, harga pra-pembelian bermula 109,900 Yuan.
Orang lain membuat kereta dalam 12 bulan, ia mengambil masa 5 tahun. 5 tahun ini bukan kecekapan rendah, ada masa yang benar-benar tidak berani dijimatkan. Seperti yang dinyatakan Li Xueyong: "Kereta bukan barang pengguna pantas, ia melibatkan keselamatan berjuta-juta keluarga, menanggung ujian keadaan jalan, iklim, kebiasaan yang berbeza di seluruh dunia." "Keperlahan" Angin dan Awan T7, bukan ketinggalan, adalah renungan terhadap "kelajuan", adalah keteguhan terhadap "baik". Keteguhan ini sendiri, layak dilihat.
Industri automotif semasa ini berlumba-lumba dalam kelajuan pelancaran, banyak model boleh mengalami pengemaskinian beberapa kali dalam masa singkat setahun, pembuatan kereta pantas mula menjadi lazim, tetapi Fengyun T7 yang memulakan prabayaran pada 12 Ogos memilih untuk bertentangan, secara terus terang menyatakan kereta global tidak boleh dibuat dengan tergesa-gesa, menonjolkan kerja teliti untuk kualiti. Penetapan harga prabayaran bermula 109,900, dengan kecekapan pembuatan global yang sebenar, dalam pasaran SUV elektrik rumah tangga kelas 100,000, benar-benar menarik perhatian.
Kereta ini perlahan dengan sebab yang munasabah, perancangan keseluruhan dua tahun sebelum dan selepas, penyelidikan dan pembangunan lengkap selama tiga tahun, tiada apa yang dikompromi untuk merebut pasaran. Ia juga bukan hanya untuk pasaran domestik, model asal dari luar negara Lepas L6 sudah dijual di Thailand, Afrika Selatan, seterusnya akan dilancarkan di Indonesia, Kesatuan Eropah, Australia dan New Zealand, model yang terlebih dahulu diuji pasaran global, kemudian dihantar kepada pengguna domestik.
Untuk menyesuaikan dengan pelbagai wilayah global, jenama bekerjasama dengan sepuluh pusat reka bentuk global, seratus pereka bekerja sama untuk mengasah, serta mengumpul keperluan sebenar lebih daripada 5,000 pengguna global untuk kerjasama, penyelidikan awal dan pengasahan pelan sahaja sudah mengambil banyak masa.
Untuk menyesuaikan dengan peraturan luar negara yang ketat, keseluruhan kenderaan dibina secara langsung untuk menepati piawaian keselamatan E-NCAP versi 2026, asas keselamatan disempurnakan sepenuhnya. Dalam fasa penyelidikan dan pembangunan, digunakan lebih 900 kereta ujian, jumlah lengkapkan 1.45 juta kilometer ujian ketahanan, dari suhu -40 darjah sejuk beku Nordic ke 55 darjah panas tropika, kelembapan tinggi, garam tinggi, jalan berbatu dan buruk semuanya dicuba satu persatu.
Kedalaman kemasukan air 500mm yang jarang dalam kelas yang sama, sistem pemanasan pam haba dua sumber, semuanya adalah pengoptimuman khusus untuk pelbagai iklim global, struktur perlindungan untuk jalan berlobang di Brazil, keadaan berlumpur di Afrika Selatan juga lengkap, pelbagai skenario melampau semuanya disahkan terlebih dahulu.
Pada tahap produk, sepenuhnya memenuhi semua keperluan pengguna rumah tangga. Semua versi dilengkapi secara seragam dengan bateri Rhino 65.05kWh, jarak tempuh CLTC 600km, jarak tempuh ujian sebenar malah boleh mencapai lebih 600km, tiada tipu helah pengurangan jarak pada varian rendah.
Jarak paksi dalam kenderaan 2700mm, kegunaan ruang sangat tinggi, ruang kaki penumpang belakang cukup, kerusi dilipat boleh membentuk ruang rata besar, perjalanan harian, kembara sendiri sesuai. Hiasan dalan menggunakan bahan mesra alam tahap EU, padan cip pintar 8775 proses 4nm, padan kenderaan pintar model besar Doubao, interaksi suara lancar, fungsi pemanduan pintar seperti parkir ingatan merentas tingkat juga lengkap.
Konfigurasi keselamatan adalah sangat ikhlas, 80% keluli kekuatan tinggi badan kenderaan padan sembilan beg udara, bateri dilengkapi 31 lapisan pelindungan perisai 6D, tahap kalis air mencapai IP68. Jaminan pembelian juga cukup menenangkan, pemilik pertama bukan komersial menikmati jaminan seumur hidup keseluruhan kenderaan termasuk tiga sistem elektrik, 666 yuan boleh dapatkan pakej penyelenggaraan asas seumur hidup, kerosakan haba bateri, kecelakaan pemanduan pintar juga ada ganti rugi perlindungan ganda tinggi, menghilangkan kebimbangan penggunaan kenderaan sama sekali.
Kini terlalu banyak kereta baharu hanya mahu pelancaran cepat, tetapi abaikan kebolehpercayaan jangka panjang, Fengyun T7 rela bersabar gunakan lima tahun masa mengasah satu SUV elektrik global, bermula 10.99 wan boleh dapatkan kualiti piawaian global penuh, falsafah jangka panjang ini, untuk pengguna keluarga biasa sangat bernilai.
今晚，奇瑞風雲全新全球品質純電 SUV 風雲 T7 正式開啟預訂。本次預訂發布會以「慢功造好車，久等咗」為主題，傳遞奇瑞風雲長期主義造車理念：摒棄行業速成造車思路，以全球統一嚴苛標準打磨整車品質，打造面向全球市場嘅家用純電車型，同時向長久期待新車嘅用戶致以誠摯謝意。新車共推出 3 款版型，預訂指導價 10.99 萬 - 12.99 萬元，下訂用戶可享受官方 7 重購車權益。
當下全球汽車產業迎來「中國時間」，國產新能源憑藉成熟技術同智造實力持續領跑海外市場。依托奇瑞 23 年全球化技術積澱，風雲 T7 採用「反向出海試煉」研發路線，海外同源車型 Lepas L6 登陸米蘭設計週收穫國際認可，先通過全球多元路況、氣候測試，再面向國內家庭上市。品牌深挖當代家庭出行痛點，提煉顏值、安全、出行、智能、舒享、安心六大核心剛需，打造全能均衡純電 SUV，全面適配城市通勤、長途自駕、戶外露營、全家多人出行等各類場景。
顏值剛需：融合全球審美同東方雅韻，長效質感持久在線
風雲 T7 由奇瑞全球 10 大設計中心聯合打造，研發階段邀請 5000 餘名海內外用戶全程共創，平衡國際簡約風格同東方雅緻氣韻。標誌性馭風前臉、流暢風塑綢緞車身搭配貫穿式天際霞光尾門，線條靈動兼具力量感。整車漆面對標海外耐候標準，抗暴曬、抗腐蝕，長期使用唔易失光褪色，提供熾焰橙、山煙紫、雲粉米、流光銀、青竹灰、墨石黑 6 款配色，滿足多元審美。
內飾提供溫暖黑棕、極夜黑曜兩種風格，雲翼環抱座艙大面積採用軟質包覆，搭配鵝卵石懸浮揚聲器、菱格綾縫座椅，細節精緻高級。車內皮革、密封條、塑料件均經過長效老化測試，唔易硬化褪色，多年使用依然嶄新，兼顧好睇同耐用兩大核心需求。
安全剛需：全域五星防護體系，全球路況全維度兜底
安全係家用车核心底線，風雲 T7 對標 2026 版 E-NCAP 五星安全標準打造，功能安全達到 ASILD 最高等級。新車經歷 2 年策劃、3 年研發，投入 81 台專屬耐久車開展全球同步路試，整車累計測試里程超 600 萬公里，耐久專項測試 145 萬公里；研發團隊奔赴東南亞雨季、中東高溫、印尼高濕沿海等多地完成極限試煉，適配全球複雜用車環境。
車身採用 80% 高強度鋼、18.84% 熱成型鋼打造九橫五縱籠式車身，搭配 Shotgun 防撞結構、雙框副車架與電池防撞桿，規劃前方 9 條、側面 6 條碰撞傳力通道，撞擊時高效分散衝擊力，守住乘員生存空間。全系標準配備 9 個氣囊，含 48L 雙腔遠端氣囊同後排側氣囊，實現全車 360°被動防護。
全系搭載犀牛安全電池，6D 立體防護結構抵禦擠壓、穿刺、衝擊；電池達到 IP68 防水等級，防護能力係國標 96 倍，無懼城市內澇、積水涉水，從根源規避電池進水短路、熱失控風險。
出行剛需：全系 600km 續航平權，適配全球多元氣候工況
風雲 T7 實現續航全系平權，三款車型統一搭載 65.05kWh 犀牛電池，CLTC 標準續航 600km，實車路況實測續航可達 667km 以上，做到「反向虛標」，徹底消除里程焦慮。快充表現亮眼，電量 30% 充至 80% 僅需 20 分鐘，短途休整即可補足長途續航。
車輛搭載全域一體化熱管理雙源寬熱泵空調 + 高壓 PTC，-30℃至 55℃超寬溫域穩定工作。北方冬季熱泵制熱更省電，大幅降低低溫續航折損；南方酷暑散熱高效，車內快速降溫。同時配備 AGS 智能進氣格柵同 14 項低風阻優化，高低速行駛能耗穩定，進一步釋放長續航優勢。
智能剛需：艙駕一體 8775 高算力芯片，一半懂你一半護你
風雲 T7 搭載 4nm 製程艙駕一體 8775 芯片，72TOPS 高算力，交互響應僅 80ms，整機開機速度提升 33%，車機操作流暢無卡頓，打通智能座艙同駕駛輔助兩大域，兼顧人性化交互同行車安全。
智能座艙配備 15.6 吋 2.5K 防眩光高清大螢幕，支援無線 CarPlay、HUAWEI HiCar、CarLink，兼容市面 99% 以上手機互聯。靈犀智艙 2.0 內建 6 種真人化語音人設，搭配小憩、露營、寵物、醒神等六大全場景模式；小奇同學交互自然，可一鍵切換座艙燈光、空調、多媒體設置，打造專屬移動生活空間。
獵鷹 500 駕駛輔助系統搭載 3 顆毫米波雷達、7 個高清攝影鏡頭、12 個超聲波雷達，合計 22 顆高精度傳感器，支援 300+ 全場景自動泊車，斷頭路泊車、一鍵循跡倒車、跨樓層立體車庫泊車均可自動完成，徹底解決停車難題，實現泊車自由。
舒享剛需：超大寬適座艙，國際大師底盤調校穩靜出行
整車尺寸 4570×1852×1694mm，軸距 2700mm，車內空間得房率 84%。後排純平地台，腿部空間達 911mm，長途乘坐無局促感；後排座椅放倒後形成 1955mm 純平大床，常規後廂 450L，拓展最大容積 1550L，露營裝備、大件行李輕鬆容納。
座椅採用 9 層雲感填充材質，軟彈支撐唔塌陷，全系前排配備通風、加熱功能。加熱支援 3 檔溫控，-20℃低溫下 5 分鐘升溫至 30℃；吸風式通風設計，夏季乘坐唔悶汗。全車設置 38 處分層儲物空間，搭配 4 個 300kg 承重鉚環、2 個 3kg 承重掛鉤，戶外物資、大件貨物均可牢固固定。
底盤由瑪莎拉蒂前底盤調校專家領銜國際團隊打磨，50.8:49.2 黃金軸荷比，有效抑制過彎推頭、高速甩尾，提升行駛穩定性。依托奇瑞 26 年底盤正向研發功底同國內首台雙軸 K&C 試驗台技術積澱，濾震柔和、行駛穩沉，駕乘質感媲美高端車型。
安心剛需：兩大兜底 + 兩大終身權益，全週期用車無憂
奇瑞針對用戶長期用車顧慮，為風雲 T7 定製兩大兜底保障、兩項終身權益，覆蓋購車到長期使用全週期：
兩大兜底權益1. 動力電池安全兜底：因電池自身質量問題引發整車熱失控損毀，賠償同款或同配置全新車輛；
2. 輔助駕駛兜底：購車 1 年內，泊車、智能領航場景下判定為輔助系統故障引發事故，人員與第三者損失最高賠償 500 萬元。
兩大終身權益1. 整車終身質保：價值 10000 元整車（含三電）終身質保，易損、特殊消耗件除外；
2. 終身保養套裝：666 元即可購入原價 3999 元終身基礎保養套裝，每年享 1 次免費基礎保養。
從全球標準研發、國際化設計、高標準製造到跨地域極限路況驗證，風雲 T7 依托全鏈路全球品質管控，樹立十萬級純電 SUV 價值新標竿。該車經歷全球多樣環境嚴苛試煉回歸國內，以顏值、安全、續航、智能、空間、用車保障六大維度均衡實力，精準匹配中國品質家庭全部出行需求。風雲 T7 唔止係奇瑞 23 年全球化技術沉澱嘅結晶，更係全球造車標準同國內家庭真實用車需求深度契合嘅產品。目前新車預訂全面開啟，全國門店均可到店體驗試駕，呢台兼顧全球品質同家用實用性嘅純電 SUV，現已就位，靜候每一位熱愛生活嘅用戶。
Di pasaran SUV Malaysia, banyak pembeli yang membandingkan Proton X90 dan Chery Tiggo Cross ketika memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kereta ini memiliki harga dan kedudukan pasaran yang agak hampir, hari ini kita akan melakukan perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Proton X90 dijual dengan harga OTR di Malaysia antara RM 106,800 hingga 122,800, terdapat 4 varian, termasuk 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800) dan lain-lain.
Chery Tiggo Cross dijual dengan harga OTR di Malaysia antara RM 88,750 hingga 99,750, terdapat 2 varian, termasuk 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH (RM 99,750), 2025 1.5T Standard (RM 88,750) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Chery Tiggo Cross lebih murah RM 18,050 berbanding Proton X90. Sejujurnya, pada julat harga ini, beza beberapa ribu sebenarnya tidak begitu besar, yang penting adalah melihat nisbah nilai keseluruhan dan kos penggunaan jangka panjang.
Proton X90 dilengkapi enjin 1.5L Turbo, kuasa 140 hp. Penggunaan minyak rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo Cross dilengkapi enjin 1.5L 4-silinder, kuasa 105 hp. Penggunaan minyak rasmi 6.0 L/100km.
Dari segi kuasa, enjin 1.5L Turbo Proton X90 mempunyai 35 kuasa kuda lebih daripada 1.5L 4-silinder Chery Tiggo Cross, pecutan tengah lebih meyakinkan, terutamanya ketika memotong di lebuh raya. Namun, penggunaan minyak Chery Tiggo Cross mungkin lebih jimat, perbezaan untuk perjalanan harian di bandar tidak akan terlalu besar.
Rating keselamatan Proton X90 ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Rating keselamatan Chery Tiggo Cross ialah TBD, sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk Basic.
Dari segi kelengkapan keselamatan, kedua-dua kereta telah mendapat rating yang baik. Namun, ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) pada Proton X90 dan Basic pada Chery Tiggo Cross mempunyai beberapa perbezaan dari segi fungsi, jika anda memberi penekanan kepada keselamatan aktif, anda boleh membandingkan senarai fungsi kedua-dua dengan teliti.
Panjang badan Proton X90 4400 mm, ruang bagasi 400 L.
Panjang badan Chery Tiggo Cross 4400 mm, ruang bagasi 400 L.
Saiz kedua-dua kereta hampir sama, ruang dalam kenderaan tidak terlalu berbeza. Kereta di tahap ini, penggunaan harian adalah cukup.
Proton X90 mempunyai garansi 5 tahun/150,000km, selang servis setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Chery Tiggo Cross mempunyai garansi 3 tahun/100,000km, selang servis setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Secara keseluruhan, Proton X90 dan Chery Tiggo Cross adalah model kereta yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih mana satu, yang penting adalah melihat keperluan dan bajet anda sendiri. Kami menyarankan agar anda membuat kajian dengan baik, bandingkan banyak tawaran kedai kereta, kemudian test drive untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa membuat kajian pasti tidak salah.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候，都會拎 Proton X90 同 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000） 等。
由價錢嚟睇，Proton X90 嘅起價確實比 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 平咗 RM 52,950。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經滿足日常需求。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上面會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Proton X90 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 配備 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Proton X90 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X90 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 嘅安全评分係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都攞到唔錯嘅評分。不過 Proton X90 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較吓兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X90 車身長度 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 車身長度 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X90 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。
總體嚟講，Proton X90 同 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試車做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X90 同 Chery Tiggo 8 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
Chery Tiggo 8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,750 - 129,750，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2026 1.6T Standard（RM 129,750） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X90 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 8 平咗 RM 22,950。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都唔要忘記，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會要取舍，具體要看你嘅需要。
Proton X90 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 8 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩款車用緊同一套動力系統，日常開落嚟嘅感受基本冇分別。油耗方面都幾似，唔使太糾結呢一點。
Proton X90 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 8 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X90 同 Chery Tiggo 8 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總體嚟講，Proton X90 同 Chery Tiggo 8 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers often compare Proton X90 and Chery Tiggo Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X90 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
The OTR price of Chery Tiggo Cross in Malaysia is RM 88,750 - 99,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH (RM 99,750), 2025 1.5T Standard (RM 88,750), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Chery Tiggo Cross is RM 18,050 cheaper than Proton X90. Honestly, in this price range, the difference of a few thousand is actually not significant; the key is to look at overall value for money and long-term usage costs.
Proton X90 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo Cross body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, and the interior space is not much different. For cars in this class, they are fully sufficient for daily use.
Proton X90 uses FWD drive mode.
Chery Tiggo Cross uses FWD drive mode.
Both cars use the same drive mode, both are FWD, and there shouldn't be much difference in daily driving experience.
Proton X90 and Chery Tiggo Cross are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and second-hand price more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, we recommend test driving both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X90 and Chery Tiggo Cross are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, comparing quotes from a few car dealers, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will definitely not be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X90 and Mazda CX-8 when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save the time of doing research.
The OTR price of Proton X90 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 variants, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
The OTR price of Mazda CX-8 in Malaysia is RM 165,360 - 201,360, with a total of 5 variants, including 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol (RM 201,360), 2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel (RM 193,123), 2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol (RM 186,360), etc.
Looking at the price, Proton X90's starting price is indeed RM 58,560 cheaper than Mazda CX-8. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note that the few thousand ringgit difference may have trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X90 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo engine, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-8 is equipped with a 2.0L 4-cyl engine, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption is 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Mazda CX-8's 2.0L 4-cyl has 30 horsepower more than Proton X90's 1.5L Turbo. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power and won't feel lacking.
Proton X90's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-8's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Brand ADAS.
Both cars have the same safety rating. In this class, safety features are quite comprehensive. New cars nowadays are safe enough, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X90 warranty is 5 years/150,000 km, maintenance interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-8 warranty is 5 years/150,000 km, maintenance interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.
The warranty conditions for both cars are the same, no need to agonize over this aspect. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and parts prices. It is recommended to ask real owners in car owner groups for their experiences.
In general, Proton X90 and Mazda CX-8 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest you do your research, compare quotes from a few dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending time on research will definitely not be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X90 and Mazda CX-60 when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you research time.
Proton X90 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800) etc.
Mazda CX-60 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 200,510 - 252,873, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus (RM 252,873), 2025 2.5L 2WD High (RM 200,510) etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Proton X90 is indeed RM 93,710 cheaper than Mazda CX-60. If your budget is limited, the entry-level Proton can already meet daily needs. But you should also note, the few thousand cheaper may involve trade-offs in equipment, it depends on your needs.
Proton X90 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-60 safety rating is 5★ (Euro NCAP), active safety systems include i-Activsense Pro.
Regarding safety features, both cars received good ratings. However, Proton X90's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Mazda CX-60's i-Activsense Pro have some functional differences. If you value active safety highly, you can compare their feature lists in detail.
Proton X90 body length is 4400 mm, trunk capacity 400 L.
Mazda CX-60 body length is 4500 mm, trunk capacity 450 L.
In terms of space, Mazda CX-60 body is 100 mm longer than Proton X90, passenger space has more advantage. However Proton X90 is slightly more flexible for parking in the city, each has trade-offs.
Proton X90 and Mazda CX-60 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately it is recommended to test drive both, hands-on experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X90 and Mazda CX-60 are both quite good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X90 and Mazda CX-5 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X90's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
Mazda CX-5's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 135,469 - 166,760, with a total of 3 versions, including 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary (RM 316,154), 2025 2.0L AT (RM 296,154), 2025 2.0L MT (RM 294,154), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X90 is indeed RM 28,669 cheaper than Mazda CX-5. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand savings might involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X90 features a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-5 features a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, the driving feel is basically no difference. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X90's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-5's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features in this class are quite comprehensive. New cars nowadays have good safety, no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X90 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mazda CX-5 body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
Regarding space, Mazda CX-5's body is 100 mm longer than Proton X90, offering better passenger space. However, Proton X90 is slightly more flexible for parking in the city, both have trade-offs.
Proton X90 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-5 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, no need to worry about this aspect. Actual maintenance cost also depends on the brand's service network and parts price, it is suggested to ask real owners in car owner groups for their experience.
In summary, Proton X90 and Mazda CX-5 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealers, and go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X90 and Mazda CX-5 when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X90 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800. There are a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
The OTR price of Mazda CX-5 in Malaysia is RM 135,469 - 166,760. There are a total of 3 versions, including 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary (RM 316,154), 2025 2.0L AT (RM 296,154), 2025 2.0L MT (RM 294,154), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X90 is indeed RM 28,669 cheaper than Mazda CX-5. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the few thousand cheaper might involve compromises in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X90's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-5's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include .
Both cars have the same safety rating. Safety features in this class are quite comprehensive. New cars today have good safety, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X90 adopts FWD drive method.
Mazda CX-5 adopts FWD drive method.
Both cars have the same drive method, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not have too big a difference.
Proton X90 and Mazda CX-5 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with more configurations. Finally, it is recommended to test drive both models; experiencing it personally is the most important.
Overall, Proton X90 and Mazda CX-5 are both quite good car models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, spending some time on research will definitely not be wrong.
Dalam pasaran SUV Malaysia, ramai pembeli membandingkan Proton X90 dan Mazda CX-8 semasa memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kereta ini mempunyai harga dan kedudukan pasaran yang agak serupa. Hari ini, kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa menyiapkan kajian.
Harga OTR Proton X90 di Malaysia ialah RM 106,800 - 122,800, dengan keseluruhan 4 versi, termasuk 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Mazda CX-8 di Malaysia ialah RM 165,360 - 201,360, dengan keseluruhan 5 versi, termasuk 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol (RM 201,360), 2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel (RM 193,123), 2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol (RM 186,360), dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X90 memang lebih murah RM 58,560 berbanding Mazda CX-8. Jika bajet anda terhad, versi asas Proton sudah cukup untuk memenuhi keperluan harian. Namun, perlu diingat, beberapa ribu ringgit yang lebih murah itu mungkin melibatkan kompromi pada kelengkapan, bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Proton X90 dilengkapkan enjin 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Penggunaan minyak rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-8 dilengkapkan enjin 2.0L 4-silinder, 170 hp. Penggunaan minyak rasmi 8.0 L/100km.
Dari segi kuasa, enjin 2.0L 4-silinder Mazda CX-8 mempunyai 30 hp lebih daripada enjin 1.5L Turbo Proton X90. Namun, untuk pemanduan harian dalam bandar, kuasa kedua-dua kereta ini sudah mencukupi dan tidak akan terasa kurang tenaga.
Penilaian keselamatan Proton X90 ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Penilaian keselamatan Mazda CX-8 ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk Brand ADAS.
Kedua-dua kereta mempunyai penilaian keselamatan yang sama, kelengkapan keselamatan dalam tahap ini dianggap sangat lengkap. Keselamatan kereta baru semasa ini tidak buruk, tiada perlu terlalu bimbang mengenai perkara ini.
Proton X90 menggunakan sistem pemacu FWD.
Mazda CX-8 menggunakan sistem pemacu FWD.
Sistem pemacu kedua-dua kereta adalah sama, iaitu FWD, tidak akan ada perbezaan ketara dalam pengalaman memandu harian.
Secara keseluruhannya, Proton X90 dan Mazda CX-8 adalah model yang sangat bagus di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih mana satu bergantung pada keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Disyorkan agar anda membuat kajian, membandingkan beberapa sebut harga daripada dealer kereta, kemudian buat ujian memandu untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa membuat kajian tidak akan salah.
Pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli membandingkan Proton X90 dan Mazda CX-5 semasa memilih kereta. Kedua-dua kereta ini mempunyai harga dan perancangan yang hampir sama, hari ini kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek, membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kaji selidik.
Harga OTR Proton X90 di Malaysia ialah RM 106,800 - 122,800, terdapat 4 varian, termasuk 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Mazda CX-5 di Malaysia ialah RM 135,469 - 166,760, terdapat 3 varian, termasuk 2025 2.0L AT Peringatan ke-35 Tahun (RM 316,154), 2025 2.0L AT (RM 296,154), 2025 2.0L MT (RM 294,154) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X90 memang RM 28,669 lebih murah daripada Mazda CX-5. Jika bajet anda terhad, varian asas Proton sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Tetapi perhatikan juga, beribu ringgit yang lebih murah itu, mungkin ada kompromi pada kelengkapan, bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Pengkelasan keselamatan Proton X90 ialah 5 Bintang (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Pengkelasan keselamatan Mazda CX-5 ialah 5 Bintang (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk.
Pengkelasan keselamatan kedua-dua kereta adalah sama, pada tahap ini kelengkapan keselamatan adalah cukup lengkap. Keselamatan kereta baru semasa ini tidak rendah, tiada perlu terlalu risau mengenai hal ini.
Panjang badan Proton X90 4400 mm, kapasiti bagasi 400 L.
Panjang badan Mazda CX-5 4500 mm, kapasiti bagasi 450 L.
Dari segi ruang, badan Mazda CX-5 lebih panjang 100 mm daripada Proton X90, ruang penumpang lebih menguntungkan. Namun Proton X90 lebih fleksibel untuk memarkir di bandar, masing-masing ada kompromi.
Waranti Proton X90 5 tahun/150,000 km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000 km atau 6 bulan.
Waranti Mazda CX-5 5 tahun/150,000 km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000 km atau 6 bulan.
Kondisi waranti kedua-dua kereta adalah sama, tidak perlu bimbang mengenai hal ini. Kos penyelenggaraan sebenar bergantung pada rangkaian perkhidmatan jenama dan harga komponen, disyorkan tanya pemilik kereta sebenar di kumpulan pengguna kereta.
Secara keseluruhannya, Proton X90 dan Mazda CX-5 adalah model kereta yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih mana satu, kunci utamanya masih bergantung pada keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Kami cadangkan anda membuat kaji selidik terlebih dahulu, bandingkan tawaran daripada beberapa pengedar kereta, kemudian buat ujian pemanduan untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara penting, meluangkan masa membuat kaji selidik tidak akan salah.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X90 and Mazda CX-3 when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
Proton X90's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 variants, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
Mazda CX-3's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 126,159 - 139,159, with a total of 2 variants, including 2023 2.0L High (RM 139,159), 2023 2.0L Plus (RM 126,159), etc.
From the price perspective, Proton X90's starting price is indeed RM 19,359 cheaper than Mazda CX-3. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, be aware that the difference of a few thousand ringgit might involve trade-offs in features, which depends on your specific requirements.
Proton X90's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-3's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including i-Activsense.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive for this segment. New car safety in general is not bad these days, no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X90 adopts FWD drive system.
Mazda CX-3 adopts FWD drive system.
Both cars use the same drive system, both are FWD, and there won't be a significant difference in daily driving feel.
Proton X90 warranty is 5 years / 150,000 km, maintenance interval is every 10,000 km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-3 warranty is 5 years / 150,000 km, maintenance interval is every 10,000 km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty terms, no need to worry about this aspect. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and parts prices, it is recommended to ask real owners in car owner groups for experience.
Overall, Proton X90 and Mazda CX-3 are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended that you do your homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then go for a test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will never go wrong.
Dalam pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli semasa memilih kereta biasanya membandingkan Proton X90 dan Toyota Fortuner. Kedua-dua kereta ini mempunyai harga dan kedudukan yang hampir sama, hari ini kita akan buat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek, membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat kajian.
Harga OTR Proton X90 di Malaysia ialah RM 106,800 - 122,800, terdapat 4 varian, termasuk 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Toyota Fortuner di Malaysia ialah RM 195,880 - 241,880, terdapat 3 varian, termasuk 2024 2.8T VRZ Diesel (RM 241,880), 2024 2.7L SRZ Petrol (RM 202,880), 2024 2.4L Standard Diesel (RM 195,880) dan lain-lain.
Dilihat dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X90 memang lebih murah RM 89,080 berbanding Toyota Fortuner. Jika bajet anda terhad, varian asas Proton sudah boleh memenuhi keperluan harian. Tetapi berhati-hati, beberapa ribu ringgit yang lebih murah itu mungkin ada pertukaran pada peralatan, ia bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Proton X90 dilengkapi 1.5L Turbo, kuasa 140 hp. Jimat minyak rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Toyota Fortuner dilengkapi 2.5L Diesel, kuasa 187 hp. Jimat minyak rasmi 8.5 L/100km.
Dari segi kuasa, 2.5L Diesel Toyota Fortuner mempunyai 47 hp lebih daripada 1.5L Turbo Proton X90. Namun, untuk memandu harian di bandar, kedua-dua kereta ini mempunyai kuasa yang mencukupi, anda tidak akan terasa kurang kuasa.
Panjang badan Proton X90 4400 mm, bak 400 L.
Panjang badan Toyota Fortuner 4400 mm, bak 400 L.
Dimensi kedua-dua kereta hampir sama, ruang dalaman tidak banyak berbeza. Kereta dalam tahap ini, untuk penggunaan harian sudah cukup.
Proton X90 menggunakan cara pemanduan FWD.
Toyota Fortuner menggunakan cara pemanduan FWD.
Cara pemanduan kedua-dua kereta sama, kedua-duanya FWD, pengalaman memandu harian tidak akan berbeza terlalu banyak.
Secara keseluruhannya, Proton X90 dan Toyota Fortuner kedua-duanya merupakan model kereta yang bagus di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana satu, kunci utamanya adalah melihat keperluan dan bajet anda sendiri. Kami cadangkan anda membuat kajian, bandingkan banyak tawaran daripada beberapa pengedar kereta, kemudian uji untuk membuat keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa untuk membuat kajian tidak akan pernah salah.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家在揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X90 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價錢同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做個詳細比較，幫到你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一齊共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等等。
Toyota Corolla Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 133,800 - 148,800，一齊共有 3 個版本，包括 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport（RM 148,800）、2026 HEV 1.8L Standard（RM 140,800）、2026 1.8L Standard（RM 133,800） 等等。
由價錢睇落，Proton X90 嘅起價的確比 Toyota Corolla Cross 平咗 RM 27,000。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取捨，具體睇返你嘅需要。
Proton X90 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Toyota Corolla Cross 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩款車用咗同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感受基本冇分別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太糾結呢一點。
Proton X90 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
Toyota Corolla Cross 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸差唔多一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全足夠。
Proton X90 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更介意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總嚟講，Proton X90 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵始終都要睇返你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
Di pasaran SUV Malaysia, banyak pembeli semasa memilih kereta akan membandingkan Proton X90 dan Honda CR-V. Kedua-dua kereta ini agak hampir dari segi harga dan kedudukan. Hari ini, kita akan membuat perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek, membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat penyelidikan.
Harga OTR Proton X90 di Malaysia ialah RM 106,800 - 122,800, terdapat sebanyak 4 versi, termasuk 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Honda CR-V di Malaysia ialah RM 178,200 - 195,900, terdapat sebanyak 4 versi, termasuk 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Proton X90 memang lebih murah RM 71,400 berbanding Honda CR-V. Jika bajet anda terhad, versi pemula Proton sudah cukup memenuhi keperluan harian. Tetapi perlu diingat, perbezaan harga beberapa ribu itu mungkin ada kompromi dari segi kelengkapan, bergantung pada keperluan anda.
Proton X90 dilengkapi enjin 1.5L Turbo, kuasa 140 hp. Penggunaan bahan api rasmi 7.0 L/100km.
Honda CR-V dilengkapi enjin 2.0L 4-silinder, kuasa 170 hp. Penggunaan bahan api rasmi 8.0 L/100km.
Dari segi kuasa, enjin 2.0L 4-silinder Honda CR-V mempunyai 30 hp lebih daripada enjin 1.5L Turbo Proton X90. Namun untuk pemanduan harian di bandar, kuasa kedua-dua kereta sudah mencukupi, anda tidak akan rasa kurang tenaga.
Tahap keselamatan Proton X90 ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Tahap keselamatan Honda CR-V ialah 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), sistem keselamatan aktif termasuk Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Tahap keselamatan kedua-dua kereta adalah sama, kelengkapan keselamatan dalam kelas ini dianggap lengkap. Kereta baru semasa mempunyai keselamatan yang baik, tidak perlu terlalu bimbang tentang perkara ini.
Panjang badan Proton X90 4400 mm, ruang bagasi 400 L.
Panjang badan Honda CR-V 4500 mm, ruang bagasi 450 L.
Dari segi ruang, badan Honda CR-V lebih panjang 100 mm berbanding Proton X90, ruang penumpang lebih menguntungkan. Namun Proton X90 lebih fleksibel untuk diparkir di bandar, masing-masing ada kelebihan dan kekurangan.
Proton X90 menggunakan cara pemanduan FWD.
Honda CR-V menggunakan cara pemanduan FWD.
Cara pemanduan kedua-dua kereta adalah sama, iaitu FWD, tiada perbezaan besar dalam pengalaman memandu harian.
Secara keseluruhannya, Proton X90 dan Honda CR-V adalah model yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih mana satu, kunci utama adalah melihat keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Disarankan membuat penyelidikan terlebih dahulu, membandingkan banyak tawaran daripada beberapa kedai kereta, kemudian buat ujian memandu untuk keputusan akhir. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa untuk penyelidikan tidak akan salah.
Dalam pasaran SUV di Malaysia, ramai pembeli yang membandingkan Proton X90 dan Honda WR-V apabila memilih kereta. Kedua-dua model kereta ini mempunyai harga dan kelas yang agak hampir. Hari ini, kita akan melakukan perbandingan terperinci dari pelbagai aspek untuk membantu anda menjimatkan masa membuat penyelidikan.
Harga OTR Proton X90 di Malaysia adalah RM 106,800 - 122,800, terdapat 4 varian, termasuk 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800) dan lain-lain.
Harga OTR Honda WR-V di Malaysia adalah RM 89,900 - 107,900, terdapat 4 varian, termasuk 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900) dan lain-lain.
Dari segi harga, harga permulaan Honda WR-V lebih murah RM 16,900 berbanding Proton X90. Jujur berkata, pada julat harga ini, perbezaan beberapa ribu sebenarnya tidak besar, yang penting adalah melihat nilai wang keseluruhan dan kos penggunaan jangka panjang.
Proton X90 menggunakan kaedah pemacu FWD.
Honda WR-V menggunakan kaedah pemacu FWD.
Kaedah pemacu kedua-dua kereta adalah sama, iaitu FWD, tiada perbezaan besar dalam pengalaman memandu sehari-hari.
Jaminan Proton X90 5 tahun/150,000km, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Jaminan Honda WR-V 5 tahun/jarak tanpa had, selang penyelenggaraan setiap 10,000km atau 6 bulan.
Proton X90 dan Honda WR-V kedua-duanya pilihan utama di pasaran Malaysia, sesuai untuk kegunaan keluarga dan perjalanan harian. Jika anda lebih mengutamakan reputasi jenama dan nilai jualan semula, anda boleh memprioritaskan yang mempunyai reputasi lebih baik; jika anda lebih mementingkan nilai wang dan kelengkapan, pilihlah model yang mempunyai kelengkapan lebih banyak. Pada akhirnya, disarankan untuk memandu kedua-dua model, pengalaman langsung adalah yang paling penting.
Secara keseluruhannya, Proton X90 dan Honda WR-V adalah model kereta yang sangat baik di pasaran Malaysia. Memilih yang mana, ia bergantung pada keperluan dan bajet peribadi anda. Kami menyarankan anda membuat penyelidikan terlebih dahulu, bandingkan sebut harga dari beberapa dealer kereta, kemudian buat keputusan akhir selepas ujian memandu. Membeli kereta adalah perkara besar, meluangkan masa membuat penyelidikan pasti tidak akan salah.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X90 同 Honda WR-V 做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好相近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
Honda WR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,900 - 107,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2023 1.5L V（RM 99,900）、2023 1.5L E（RM 95,900）、2023 1.5L S（RM 89,900） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Honda WR-V 嘅起步價比 Proton X90 平咗 RM 16,900。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千塊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長遠使用成本。
Proton X90 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Honda WR-V 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Proton X90 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Honda WR-V 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力，中段加速更有信心，尤其係跑高速公路超車嘅時候。不過 Honda WR-V 嘅油耗可能更友好，日常市區通勤差別唔會太大。
Proton X90 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Honda WR-V 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全足夠。
Proton X90 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Honda WR-V 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。
Proton X90 同 Honda WR-V 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終仲係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總嘅嚟講，Proton X90 同 Honda WR-V 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
Written by | Liu Ying
Edited by| Huang Dalu
Designed by | Zhen Youmei
On the evening of July 28, 2026, the ground in Kyushu began to shake without warning.
On the assembly line at the Miyata Plant in Fukuoka Prefecture, robotic arms hung in mid-air and suddenly stopped. Workers put down their tools and quickly evacuated the workshop along the safety aisle. Minutes later, the production lines at the Kanda and Kokura plants also came to a standstill.
This was a magnitude 7.1 earthquake.
Toyota initially thought it could resume operations quickly, but several hours later, it had to shut down three plants again. Production was scheduled to resume on July 31, but the deadline was subsequently pushed back to August 5.
The shadow of the halt quickly spread from Kyushu to Honshu. Nissan HQ initially announced "production as usual" externally, but only two days later, due to parts not arriving at the factory in time, some production lines had to stop as well. A Toyota plant in Aichi Prefecture, over 600 kilometers away, was also affected.
As of August 4, 2026, four Toyota plants in Kyushu were still scheduled to shut down until August 5, and another plant in central Japan was scheduled to halt until August 7. Two of these four plants are vehicle assembly bases.
Such scenes are not unfamiliar to the Japanese automotive industry.
In 1995, factories in Kobe were filled with cracks after the earthquake; in 2004, the shutdown of a small factory in Niigata forced all four Honda production bases to stall simultaneously; in 2007, an inconspicuous piston ring held back half of the Japanese automotive companies; in 2011, a tsunami swept away factories along the coastline, and Toyota buyers traced layer by layer along supply relationship maps, finally marking 659 damaged supply points in the ruins.
For thirty years, Japanese car companies have continuously reinforced their supply chains, but this earthquake proved again that a factory withstanding impact does not mean the production line can be restarted immediately.
The Factory Withstood the Earthquake
The aftershocks had not yet subsided, but engineers were already wearing hard hats and walking back into the workshop with inspection checklists. The light beam from flashlights swept across weld seams, and precision equipment had to be checked one by one.
Toyota did not find large-scale structural damage in the three plants, yet they did not resume work.
Just because the factory looks undamaged does not mean production conditions have been restored. After violent shaking, the processing accuracy inside precision equipment may have quietly shifted. Engineers must remeasure and calibrate parameters, then confirm quality using prototype products. Only when equipment, pipelines, energy supply, and product accuracy all meet requirements can the production line restart.
The company's statement reflected a kind of caution: "Including aftershocks and recovery work, the situation changes every day."
During this period, Mitsubishi reduced production at its Mizushima Plant in Okayama Prefecture, and Honda extended the shutdown time at its Kumamoto Plant to repair damaged facilities.
The situation encountered by semiconductor factories was even more tricky.
In Renesas Electronics' two plants in Kumamoto, ceiling blocks fell off, walls cracked with fine patterns, and accumulated water seeped from damaged pipes. Sony and TSMC also suspended operations. Engineers crawled into clean rooms to check gas lines and precision equipment for shifts one by one.
TSMC began restoring partial operations several hours after the earthquake; Renesas planned to restart the Kumamoto Plant in phases from August 5; Sony, however, would not be able to restore production lines to pre-quake levels until mid-August.
Nobuhiko Kiuchi, Chief Economist at Nomura Research Institute, gave a relatively optimistic judgment: "The negative impact on production activities and supply chains may be relatively short-term."
The damage from this earthquake to housing and infrastructure was relatively limited, and the shutdown of many factories included a component of preventive inspection. However, for the automotive industry which calculates beats by the minute, "short-term shutdown" still means the loss of output from multiple shifts.
As long as one key supplier has not recovered, assembly lines hundreds of kilometers away may continue to wait.
For thirty years, the change in the Japanese automotive industry has not been to eliminate this waiting entirely, but to strive to make it happen less frequently and end faster.
Small Parts Stop Big Factories
Early morning on January 17, 1995, the Great Hanshin Earthquake tore through Kobe and surrounding industrial areas. Port crane arms twisted and deformed, roads split with deep gullies, and factories and warehouses revealed collapsed corners in the morning light.
Daihatsu's two assembly plants stopped production. Mazda, due to parts shortages, was forced to suspend Hiroshima and Hofu plants, with estimated losses of about 3,000 vehicle units.
Toyota's vehicle plants themselves were not heavily damaged, but the supply of brake calipers and audio components was cut off. The company could only close all assembly facilities in Japan, with an estimated reduction of about 20,000 vehicles.
Post-event statistics showed this earthquake damaged 13 supplier production points, a number not particularly large. But some of these parts had no inventory buffer, and no alternative factories could be found to immediately step in.
Nine years later, the story repeated itself.
In October 2004, the Chuetsu earthquake in Niigata Prefecture collapsed part of the Nippon Precision Machine Nagano Factory's facilities, stopping the instrument cluster production line abruptly. Honda's Saitama and Suzuka vehicle plants, Yachiyo Industrial's Yokkaichi micro-car plant, and the Kumamoto engine plant fell into silence in succession.
Honda later disclosed that the manufacturing precision required for analog instrument pointers was extremely high, and at that time most similar products globally were produced in Niigata. The company's risk management at the time mainly targeted parts "mass-produced in only one place," relying on increased inventory to leave some buffer for supply interruptions.
In July 2007, the Chuetsu-Oki earthquake in Niigata Prefecture struck again. The walls of Riken Kashiwazaki Factory cracked, and the supply of piston rings and other parts was interrupted.
Major Japanese car companies such as Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Mazda, Mitsubishi, and Suzuki successively halted or reduced production. Honda's work stoppage area expanded from Suzuka all the way to Saitama, Yokkaichi, Hamamatsu, and Kumamoto. Whether subsequent work could resume depended entirely on when Riken could restart its machines.
Multiple car companies sent engineers, equipment maintenance personnel, and even R&D personnel to Kashiwazaki to clean the factory area, repair water and electricity with Riken employees, and check machines one by one. Honda wrote in its official history that at that time almost the entire company was mobilized, including the R&D department.
Brake calipers, instrument pointers, and piston rings are not the most expensive components on a car, but they have similar supply characteristics: concentrated production locations, limited inventory, and specialized processes that are difficult to replicate quickly.
Even if another company has the capability to produce similar parts, it must go through matching, testing, and quality confirmation. Qualified parts cannot be directly installed on another car company's production line the day after the original factory halts production.
At that time, the recovery capability of the Japanese automotive industry relied more on the tacit understanding between companies to assist each other. When the original supplier restarted determined when assembly lines hundreds of kilometers away would resume rotation.
The bigger problem was that car companies did not even fully know where their parts actually came from.
First Time Seeing the Complete Supply Network
On March 11, 2011, the ground churned violently in Japan's Tohoku region, tsunamis followed closely, and the shadow of the Fukushima nuclear accident subsequently overshadowed the whole situation.
Ports were paralyzed, roads were broken, and power and communications were interrupted on a large scale. Toyota's own production facilities were relatively limited in damage, but parts and material shortages still caused the company to suspend all vehicle production in Japan starting from March 14.
On March 15, Toyota's procurement and production teams sent out investigation teams, braving aftershocks to visit the sites of about 200 suppliers, and then tracing layer by layer along procurement relationships to continue pursuing second-tier and third-tier suppliers.
Ultimately, the company confirmed 659 supply points were damaged, procurement interruptions involved 1,260 types of parts and materials, and in the worst case might affect about 80% of global models. About 500 types of materials needed immediate repair, production transfer, or alternative development from scratch.
Honda later found during a review that many Tier 1 suppliers used products from the same damaged material factory. The company previously knew nothing about this relationship and could only temporarily unite procurement and R&D departments to use alternative materials to re-develop parts.
Renesas Electronics' Naka Plant was one of the most serious breakpoints.
The main factory building withstood the earthquake, but internal equipment, ceilings, cables, and ventilation systems suffered severe damage, and the supply of automotive microcontrollers stopped abruptly. Engineers initially estimated it would take a full six months for the factory to recover.
Dan Mahoney, then President and CEO of Renesas Electronics Americas, later recalled: "These buildings withstood the earthquake, performing quite excellently."
While the walls were saved, the facilities inside the factory, which were intertwined and precise like watch gears, still needed to be repaired and adjusted bit by bit.
At its peak, about 2,500 employees and external contractors crowded into the Naka Plant to repair day and night. Multiple car companies and suppliers sent manpower and equipment, and competitors also voluntarily postponed their orders to make space for automotive chip production.
Renesas transferred about 60% of the affected output to other factories. The Naka Plant eventually recovered partial production in three months, three months earlier than initially expected.
Toyota originally expected that all global models and production lines would not fully recover until November or December 2011. As the materials needing key processing shrunk from about 500 types at the end of March to about 30 types in May, domestic Japanese plants returned to normal first in early July, while overseas production dragged on until September to approach full recovery.
Relevant studies later found that the disruptions caused by the Great East Japan Earthquake affected not only the disaster-hit enterprises but also transmitted to their direct and indirect suppliers and customers along the trading network. This earthquake and its supply chain chain reaction caused the growth rate of Japan's actual GDP in the following year to decline by about 0.47 percentage points.
After 2011, Japanese car companies finally realized that supply chain risks do not only come from visible Tier 1 suppliers. A material or chip factory hidden deep in the network can also bring global production to a halt.
To make the supply chain more resilient, the first step is not to prepare more rescue personnel, but to first see clearly where the breakpoints are.
From Calling One by One to Finding Breakpoints According to Maps
After the Great East Japan Earthquake, Toyota established the supply chain database RESCUE, entering the production locations and upstream and downstream relationships of about 6,800 types of materials into the system, and conducting disaster drills regularly with suppliers.
From then on, procurement personnel could filter suppliers by disaster-affected areas and quickly determine which parts, models, and plants might be affected.
Honda also entered parts and actual production locations into the SCRKeeper system. In 2011, Honda still needed to call one by one to confirm supply status; later, suppliers needed to pre-register manufacturing locations and distribution routes, allowing the procurement department to see where risks were concentrated earlier.
Nissan, on the other hand, focused its efforts on the first few minutes after the earthquake occurred.
On March 11, 2011, the company established the Global Disaster Control HQ at its Yokohama HQ in just 15 minutes, immediately starting to confirm the status of employees, plants, dealers, and suppliers. Three weeks before the earthquake occurred, Nissan had just completed a related drill.
These improvements were put to the test in the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake.
On April 14 and 16, two consecutive strong earthquakes struck. Aisin Kyushu and Aisin Kyushu Casting were forced to stop production, and continuous aftershocks made inspectors hesitate to enter the building interior. Wiring, pipes, and transformer facilities inside the factory were damaged, and power was cut.
As soon as the supply of doors and engine parts produced by Aisin was cut, Toyota suspended most vehicle assembly lines in Japan starting from April 18.
This time, damaged suppliers and relevant parts could be identified relatively quickly. But knowing where the breakpoint is does not mean molds, equipment, and manufacturing processes there can be immediately replicated.
Starting from April 19, huge cranes lifted equipment and molds out of damaged factories piece by piece and slowly loaded them onto trucks.
Aisin sent 339 employees to the disaster area to shift production to affiliated enterprises in the Kyushu region and Aichi plants, with some products even urgently imported from overseas. After molds and equipment arrived at alternative bases, they still had to go through installation, debugging, trial production, and quality confirmation; every step could not be omitted.
Supply chain databases solve the "where to find" problem, but they cannot omit the physical processes required to restore manufacturing capabilities.
Progress in supply chain management is not about making these processes disappear, but about discovering problems earlier, initiating transfers earlier, and shortening shutdown times as much as possible.
Toyota Leaves Months of Inventory for Semiconductors
After the Great East Japan Earthquake, Toyota also re-examined the relationship between Just-in-Time production and inventory.
The cycle from ordering to delivery for automotive chips is long, and production is highly concentrated. According to Reuters, Toyota subsequently required suppliers in its business continuity plan to reserve two to six months of semiconductor inventory for them according to their respective delivery cycles.
This arrangement did not extend to all automotive parts. Just-in-Time and low inventory are still the basic rules for most procurement links, only microcontrollers with long production cycles, highly concentrated supply, and difficult to find temporary alternative sources, were separately included in inventory buffers.
Toyota's spokesperson spoke frankly: "For us, this is a classic lean solution."
Toyota also requires companies to master core technologies of chips used in automobiles internally and cannot hand over semiconductor capabilities completely to suppliers. Long before the launch of the Prius, Toyota began accumulating design and manufacturing capabilities for microcontrollers.
Long-accumulated technical capabilities, combined with targeted inventory reserves, meant that Toyota's impact during the initial phase of the global chip shortage in 2021 was relatively small. However, when the duration of the shortage exceeded the scope that inventory could cover, Toyota still had to adjust production.
Inventory can buy time, but cannot indefinitely offset supply interruptions.
On January 1, 2024, the Noto Peninsula earthquake struck, affecting multiple Toyota suppliers and affiliated enterprises. Before the holiday had ended, Toyota's inventory checks and damaged plant investigations had already been launched.
On January 8, the company decided to maintain the operation of Japanese vehicle plants and stated externally: "We will use parts stored outside the disaster area."
Toyota first determined the production arrangement after January 8, then step by step decided how to produce in the next stage based on aftershocks and supplier recovery progress. By January 10, the company announced that production would continue according to plan after January 15, based precisely on inventory reserves outside the disaster area and the gradual recovery of some damaged suppliers.
Off-site inventory did not replace damaged factories, but bought them a few days of breathing time.
For automotive assembly lines that calculate part inventory by the hour, these few days often determine whether the factory needs to stop immediately.
From Factory to Power, Molten Aluminum, and Data
In September 2018, the Iburi East Earthquake in Hokkaido caused widespread power outages, with darkness covering the entire industrial area.
Powertrain parts such as gearboxes produced by Toyota Motor Hokkaido Co. were subsequently cut off. Multiple Toyota vehicle plants in Japan were affected by both power restrictions and parts shortages. Motomachi, Takada, Tsutsumi, Tahara, and group company production lines could only recover in stages from September 11 to 13.
Aisin later disclosed a thrilling detail.
The Hokkaido power outage lasted for more than two days, and the company urgently gathered temporary power generation equipment from all over Japan, just to prevent the molten aluminum in the holding furnace from solidifying during the power failure.
Once high-temperature metal hardens inside the furnace, the loss is no longer just a few production shifts, but will expand to the cleaning and long-term repair of the entire set of equipment.
After this, Aisin increased its own power generation equipment and regularly conducted simulated power outage tests, determining the power supply priority order for furnace bodies, information systems, and key production facilities during power outages one by one.
The scope of disaster prevention thus expanded from walls, equipment, and pipelines to energy, work-in-progress, and even production data itself.
The way of shutdown is also becoming more refined.
On February 13, 2021, a sudden strong earthquake hit off the coast of Fukushima Prefecture. Toyota suspended 14 production lines at 9 plants in Japan. RAV4, Harrier, Land Cruiser, and multiple Lexus models were affected.
In March 2022, a strong earthquake hit off the coast of Fukushima Prefecture again. Toyota's 18 production lines at 11 plants in Japan were suspended. Crown, Mirai, RAV4, Harrier, Land Cruiser, and multiple Lexus models were affected again.
Unlike shutting down all Japanese assembly facilities together in the past, companies at this time were already able to subdivide the shutdown arrangement to specific plants, production lines, models, dates, and even shifts based on parts supply conditions.
Production lines where parts arrived normally continued to operate, and lines short of materials quietly waited for suppliers to recover. Each factory no longer had to be forced to stop and restart together at the same rhythm.
Japanese car companies will still shut down, but the probability of one supply cutoff dragging down the entire production system is decreasing.
Saving Equipment Ten Years Ago, Verifying Quality Ten Years Later
In July 2026, Aisin Kumamoto Plant once again neared the epicenter. The shaking on site was even more violent than in 2016, some water pipes burst on sound, but the factory building and major equipment did not suffer serious damage.
Aisin CFO Daisuke Kondo stated that seismic measures implemented after 2016 reduced the losses caused by this earthquake. Nearly 200 Aisin employees, customers, and partner enterprise personnel then entered the site and invested in recovery work.
Ten years ago, the starting point of recovery work was completely different.
In 2016, Aisin had to rescue molds and large equipment from damaged factories first; in 2026, major equipment was preserved, and the focus of recovery work had shifted to quality verification, logistics recovery, and supplier coordination.
The factory was still shut down, but the work content had changed. Ten years ago, the company first had to re-establish manufacturing capabilities; ten years later, major manufacturing capabilities were preserved, and on-site personnel could enter earlier for inspection, debugging, and trial production.
The reinforcement measures after 2016 did not eliminate shutdowns, but reduced direct damage and shortened the distance from the earthquake occurrence to starting production recovery.
Over the past thirty years, the first layer of change in the Japanese automotive supply chain was formed here: supply networks became more transparent, factories and equipment became more robust, key materials had more targeted inventory, and companies could also control shutdown scopes by production line rather than the entire company.
The second layer of change occurred outside Japan.
Overseas Plants Provide a Second Layer of Buffer
Domestic disaster prevention infrastructure eventually has physical limits. Faced with Japan's frequent geological disasters, in terms of macro strategy, the globalization of production capacity (such as the rise of India and Thailand bases) passively or actively became the highest level of "risk hedging".
Data from the Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association shows that Japan's domestic motor vehicle production was 8.23 million units in 2024, down 8.5% year-on-year; in the same year, Japanese car companies' overseas vehicle production reached 16.48 million units, about twice the domestic production.
Overseas plants have long undertaken most of the car production for Japanese brands. In the past, these plants mainly served local markets; now, production bases in India and Thailand began to supply more models to the Japanese market, and the number of automotive reverse imports increased accordingly.
Suzuki Motor President Toshihiro Suzuki stated in January 2025 that India will become the global production base for Suzuki EVs, and the first EV, e Vitara, will be exported to Japan, Europe, and other markets.
Toshihiro Suzuki described this game as follows: "India's scale advantage is Suzuki's strength. We will fully utilize this advantage to provide high-quality and attractive products to markets such as Europe, Japan, the Middle East, Africa, and South and Central America."
Honda plans to use India as the production and export base for a new EV starting from 2027. Toyota, Honda, and Suzuki are also continuing to expand local investment. Lower labor costs, increasingly mature parts systems, and a huge local market jointly support this round of expansion.
The importance of Indian plants is not just about lower costs. When overseas bases can produce models for Japan and multiple countries, Japanese car companies gain greater space for production allocation.
But overseas plants are not mirror backups of Japanese factories that can be activated at any time.
Models produced in different factories, parts systems, dedicated equipment, and market specifications are not exactly the same. Shifting a car from Japan to be produced in India or Thailand still requires going through equipment preparation, supplier adjustment, quality confirmation, market certification, and logistics organization.
Therefore, global layout is difficult to solve the shutdown within days after an earthquake. It provides risk dispersion over a longer cycle: reducing enterprise dependence on a single production area, and allowing for the possibility of supplementing supply from other regions when some models are restricted from production in Japan.
Japanese domestic plants will not disappear for this reason.
Toyota announced in August 2025 that it will build a new vehicle plant in Toyota City, Aichi Prefecture, planned to start production in the early 2030s. This is the first time the company has built a new vehicle assembly plant in Japan proper since 2012.
At the same time, Toyota still maintains a long-term policy of annual production of about 3 million units in Japan, with about half used for export.
Nissan moves in the opposite direction. The company plans to stop vehicle production at the Tsu Plant before March 2028, transfer related output to Nissan Automotive Kyushu, and compress global annual capacity from 3.5 million units to 2.5 million units, reducing manufacturing bases from 17 to 10.
Tsu Plant started production in 1961 and has long been known as Nissan's "Mother Plant," cumulatively producing over 17.8 million cars. Before closing, it had about 3,900 employees. Nissan Japan plants have an average capacity utilization of only about 60%. After Tsu output is transferred to Kyushu, the company expects Kyushu plant's capacity utilization will rise to 100%.
A factory carrying memories of more than half a century is about to end vehicle production, while capacity concentrates on more efficient bases.
Toyota building new plants and Nissan closing plants look in opposite directions, but the logic behind them is interconnected: Japanese automotive manufacturing will not simply move entirely overseas, but will reallocate resources between local technical capabilities, production efficiency, and global capacity.
Overseas plants will undertake more mass-market models facing the Japanese and global markets; Japan proper will retain a large amount of vehicle production capacity, continuing to undertake export, high-end models, complex powertrains, and new process introduction.
Domestic and overseas are no longer just a choice of cost high or low, but gradually constitute two layers of supply chain resilience.
Thirty Years Have Passed
Over the past thirty years, the Japanese automotive supply chain has not become a network that will not break, but Japanese car companies have successively filled in several obvious gaps.
Dedicated equipment and molds still cannot be instantly replicated, precision production lines still need recalibration, and power, logistics, parts, and personnel still must be restored simultaneously. As long as automotive production continues to rely on highly specialized equipment and suppliers, earthquakes may still bring factories to a halt.
What truly changed is the way enterprises withstand interruptions.
The actual production location of suppliers has been entered into the database, so after an earthquake, it is not necessary to inquire layer by layer starting from Tier 1 suppliers; key chips have longer inventory, which can buy recovery time for damaged factories; factory buildings, equipment, and power systems have been reinforced so as not to start with rescuing molds and machines every time; shutdown arrangements can also be subdivided into specific plants, production lines, and shifts.
By 2026, Japanese car companies are already able to quickly locate affected suppliers, keep shutdowns within specific plants and production lines, and shift the focus of recovery to quality, logistics, and coordination under the condition that equipment is basically preserved.
Domestic plants rely on seismic reinforcement, supply chain databases, key inventory, and refined production management to shorten short-term shocks; overseas plants provide more long-term capacity dispersion for enterprises by undertaking more models.
The former allows car companies to stand up faster after earthquakes, while the latter reduces the production system's long-term dependence on a single region.
After thirty years, earthquakes will still force Toyota to stop and will also make Nissan assembly lines hundreds of kilometers away fall silent for not waiting for a part. But the Japanese automotive industry is clearer than before about where to start recovery and how to recover.
"Automotive Business Review" believes that in the era of intelligent electrification, when the dependence of cars on chips and precision electronics rises exponentially, the value of this "transparent supply chain" defense system exchanged by Japanese car companies for thirty years of earthquakes will be far greater than before.
© 2024 Bitauto.com. All Rights Reserved.
Bitauto (www.yiche.com and www.bitauto.com) is one of the most visited automotive websites in China. We provide detailed info on Chinese car brands available in your area. Please note that the information provided on this website is based on publicly available data and is for reference only. It may not be fully updated or accurate at all times.
Help us improve our website
